Notation about the curvature












0












$begingroup$


I'm reading an paper about geometry, I did not understand the notation (inequality):
$$Rmgeq K$$
where k is a real constant and $Rm$ is the curvature tensor. I don't understand what that notation means because $Rm$ is a 4-tensor.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Maybe it would help if you added a link/reference to the paper
    $endgroup$
    – 0x539
    Jan 22 at 19:31










  • $begingroup$
    arxiv.org/abs/1005.3255 page 8 Theorem 2.5
    $endgroup$
    – Miguel Angel Micky Huarachi Sa
    Jan 22 at 21:29










  • $begingroup$
    They are saying all the sectional curvatures are bounded below by $K$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ted Shifrin
    Jan 22 at 21:48










  • $begingroup$
    Are you sure that is was $R_m$ and not $R_{nn}$? The latter would be the $(n,n)$ element of the Ricci curvature. Another possibility is that it is the scalar curvature, and the $m$ is some sort of label rather than an element index.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Jan 23 at 3:08


















0












$begingroup$


I'm reading an paper about geometry, I did not understand the notation (inequality):
$$Rmgeq K$$
where k is a real constant and $Rm$ is the curvature tensor. I don't understand what that notation means because $Rm$ is a 4-tensor.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Maybe it would help if you added a link/reference to the paper
    $endgroup$
    – 0x539
    Jan 22 at 19:31










  • $begingroup$
    arxiv.org/abs/1005.3255 page 8 Theorem 2.5
    $endgroup$
    – Miguel Angel Micky Huarachi Sa
    Jan 22 at 21:29










  • $begingroup$
    They are saying all the sectional curvatures are bounded below by $K$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ted Shifrin
    Jan 22 at 21:48










  • $begingroup$
    Are you sure that is was $R_m$ and not $R_{nn}$? The latter would be the $(n,n)$ element of the Ricci curvature. Another possibility is that it is the scalar curvature, and the $m$ is some sort of label rather than an element index.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Jan 23 at 3:08
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


I'm reading an paper about geometry, I did not understand the notation (inequality):
$$Rmgeq K$$
where k is a real constant and $Rm$ is the curvature tensor. I don't understand what that notation means because $Rm$ is a 4-tensor.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I'm reading an paper about geometry, I did not understand the notation (inequality):
$$Rmgeq K$$
where k is a real constant and $Rm$ is the curvature tensor. I don't understand what that notation means because $Rm$ is a 4-tensor.







differential-geometry






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 22 at 19:07









Miguel Angel Micky Huarachi SaMiguel Angel Micky Huarachi Sa

1




1












  • $begingroup$
    Maybe it would help if you added a link/reference to the paper
    $endgroup$
    – 0x539
    Jan 22 at 19:31










  • $begingroup$
    arxiv.org/abs/1005.3255 page 8 Theorem 2.5
    $endgroup$
    – Miguel Angel Micky Huarachi Sa
    Jan 22 at 21:29










  • $begingroup$
    They are saying all the sectional curvatures are bounded below by $K$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ted Shifrin
    Jan 22 at 21:48










  • $begingroup$
    Are you sure that is was $R_m$ and not $R_{nn}$? The latter would be the $(n,n)$ element of the Ricci curvature. Another possibility is that it is the scalar curvature, and the $m$ is some sort of label rather than an element index.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Jan 23 at 3:08




















  • $begingroup$
    Maybe it would help if you added a link/reference to the paper
    $endgroup$
    – 0x539
    Jan 22 at 19:31










  • $begingroup$
    arxiv.org/abs/1005.3255 page 8 Theorem 2.5
    $endgroup$
    – Miguel Angel Micky Huarachi Sa
    Jan 22 at 21:29










  • $begingroup$
    They are saying all the sectional curvatures are bounded below by $K$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ted Shifrin
    Jan 22 at 21:48










  • $begingroup$
    Are you sure that is was $R_m$ and not $R_{nn}$? The latter would be the $(n,n)$ element of the Ricci curvature. Another possibility is that it is the scalar curvature, and the $m$ is some sort of label rather than an element index.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Jan 23 at 3:08


















$begingroup$
Maybe it would help if you added a link/reference to the paper
$endgroup$
– 0x539
Jan 22 at 19:31




$begingroup$
Maybe it would help if you added a link/reference to the paper
$endgroup$
– 0x539
Jan 22 at 19:31












$begingroup$
arxiv.org/abs/1005.3255 page 8 Theorem 2.5
$endgroup$
– Miguel Angel Micky Huarachi Sa
Jan 22 at 21:29




$begingroup$
arxiv.org/abs/1005.3255 page 8 Theorem 2.5
$endgroup$
– Miguel Angel Micky Huarachi Sa
Jan 22 at 21:29












$begingroup$
They are saying all the sectional curvatures are bounded below by $K$.
$endgroup$
– Ted Shifrin
Jan 22 at 21:48




$begingroup$
They are saying all the sectional curvatures are bounded below by $K$.
$endgroup$
– Ted Shifrin
Jan 22 at 21:48












$begingroup$
Are you sure that is was $R_m$ and not $R_{nn}$? The latter would be the $(n,n)$ element of the Ricci curvature. Another possibility is that it is the scalar curvature, and the $m$ is some sort of label rather than an element index.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Jan 23 at 3:08






$begingroup$
Are you sure that is was $R_m$ and not $R_{nn}$? The latter would be the $(n,n)$ element of the Ricci curvature. Another possibility is that it is the scalar curvature, and the $m$ is some sort of label rather than an element index.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Jan 23 at 3:08












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3083568%2fnotation-about-the-curvature%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3083568%2fnotation-about-the-curvature%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?