Bacteria population growth confusion
In one of my course, it is said that a bacteria population growth can be modelled by the differential equation $P(t)'=rP(t)$ where $r$ is the growth rate. The solution of the above equation is $P_{0} e^{rt}$ which bugs me quite a lot. I looked up the Internet and found this article which explains that bacteria growth is characterised by the function $P_{0} 2^t$. Can someone help me to clear this up?
differential-equations
|
show 3 more comments
In one of my course, it is said that a bacteria population growth can be modelled by the differential equation $P(t)'=rP(t)$ where $r$ is the growth rate. The solution of the above equation is $P_{0} e^{rt}$ which bugs me quite a lot. I looked up the Internet and found this article which explains that bacteria growth is characterised by the function $P_{0} 2^t$. Can someone help me to clear this up?
differential-equations
My problem with this reasoning is that r is supposed is suppose to represent a growth rate of 100% as in the article. How do you know in advance that r in the differential equation will be different? This DE is derived in the course from the fact that $P(t+Delta t) - P(t) = rP(t)Delta t$ which is a priori found by simple book-keeping. Intuitively for me, this r of 100% should lead to a function such as $2^t$ and not $e^t$. That is what bugs me.
– Dory
Sep 20 '16 at 13:29
That web page is wrong about the bacteria. You do not start at time $0$ with a bunch of "Mr. Blue" bacteria of which every one is about to start spawning a new "Mr. Green." An actual colony of bacteria has bacteria in every stage of reproduction at any given time, so you are (almost) continuously getting new bacteria. It actually works more like the compound-interest-on-money example that is shown after the bacteria.
– David K
Sep 20 '16 at 13:38
@DavidK But isn't it true that a not completely born/formed bacteria cannot start to divide into two bacterial?
– Dory
Sep 20 '16 at 13:43
It's also important to realise that these equations are only simple models of what is happening and won't necessarily be exact in the real world. Also note that having $r$ as an unknown still includes the possibility that $r$ relates to 100%, but it also includes the possibility that it has another value.
– EHH
Sep 20 '16 at 14:19
@Dory it is not the incompletely formed bacteria that divide. My point is that if the bacteria divide once every 60 seconds, then at any instant that you look at the colony there will be some bacteria that last divided 59 seconds ago and have just 1 second left before they finish dividing again, some that divided 58 seconds, ago, and so forth. By the way, there will be almost twice as many that divided 1 second ago as the number that divided 59 seconds ago.
– David K
Sep 20 '16 at 15:15
|
show 3 more comments
In one of my course, it is said that a bacteria population growth can be modelled by the differential equation $P(t)'=rP(t)$ where $r$ is the growth rate. The solution of the above equation is $P_{0} e^{rt}$ which bugs me quite a lot. I looked up the Internet and found this article which explains that bacteria growth is characterised by the function $P_{0} 2^t$. Can someone help me to clear this up?
differential-equations
In one of my course, it is said that a bacteria population growth can be modelled by the differential equation $P(t)'=rP(t)$ where $r$ is the growth rate. The solution of the above equation is $P_{0} e^{rt}$ which bugs me quite a lot. I looked up the Internet and found this article which explains that bacteria growth is characterised by the function $P_{0} 2^t$. Can someone help me to clear this up?
differential-equations
differential-equations
edited Sep 20 '16 at 13:33
asked Sep 20 '16 at 13:08
Dory
627
627
My problem with this reasoning is that r is supposed is suppose to represent a growth rate of 100% as in the article. How do you know in advance that r in the differential equation will be different? This DE is derived in the course from the fact that $P(t+Delta t) - P(t) = rP(t)Delta t$ which is a priori found by simple book-keeping. Intuitively for me, this r of 100% should lead to a function such as $2^t$ and not $e^t$. That is what bugs me.
– Dory
Sep 20 '16 at 13:29
That web page is wrong about the bacteria. You do not start at time $0$ with a bunch of "Mr. Blue" bacteria of which every one is about to start spawning a new "Mr. Green." An actual colony of bacteria has bacteria in every stage of reproduction at any given time, so you are (almost) continuously getting new bacteria. It actually works more like the compound-interest-on-money example that is shown after the bacteria.
– David K
Sep 20 '16 at 13:38
@DavidK But isn't it true that a not completely born/formed bacteria cannot start to divide into two bacterial?
– Dory
Sep 20 '16 at 13:43
It's also important to realise that these equations are only simple models of what is happening and won't necessarily be exact in the real world. Also note that having $r$ as an unknown still includes the possibility that $r$ relates to 100%, but it also includes the possibility that it has another value.
– EHH
Sep 20 '16 at 14:19
@Dory it is not the incompletely formed bacteria that divide. My point is that if the bacteria divide once every 60 seconds, then at any instant that you look at the colony there will be some bacteria that last divided 59 seconds ago and have just 1 second left before they finish dividing again, some that divided 58 seconds, ago, and so forth. By the way, there will be almost twice as many that divided 1 second ago as the number that divided 59 seconds ago.
– David K
Sep 20 '16 at 15:15
|
show 3 more comments
My problem with this reasoning is that r is supposed is suppose to represent a growth rate of 100% as in the article. How do you know in advance that r in the differential equation will be different? This DE is derived in the course from the fact that $P(t+Delta t) - P(t) = rP(t)Delta t$ which is a priori found by simple book-keeping. Intuitively for me, this r of 100% should lead to a function such as $2^t$ and not $e^t$. That is what bugs me.
– Dory
Sep 20 '16 at 13:29
That web page is wrong about the bacteria. You do not start at time $0$ with a bunch of "Mr. Blue" bacteria of which every one is about to start spawning a new "Mr. Green." An actual colony of bacteria has bacteria in every stage of reproduction at any given time, so you are (almost) continuously getting new bacteria. It actually works more like the compound-interest-on-money example that is shown after the bacteria.
– David K
Sep 20 '16 at 13:38
@DavidK But isn't it true that a not completely born/formed bacteria cannot start to divide into two bacterial?
– Dory
Sep 20 '16 at 13:43
It's also important to realise that these equations are only simple models of what is happening and won't necessarily be exact in the real world. Also note that having $r$ as an unknown still includes the possibility that $r$ relates to 100%, but it also includes the possibility that it has another value.
– EHH
Sep 20 '16 at 14:19
@Dory it is not the incompletely formed bacteria that divide. My point is that if the bacteria divide once every 60 seconds, then at any instant that you look at the colony there will be some bacteria that last divided 59 seconds ago and have just 1 second left before they finish dividing again, some that divided 58 seconds, ago, and so forth. By the way, there will be almost twice as many that divided 1 second ago as the number that divided 59 seconds ago.
– David K
Sep 20 '16 at 15:15
My problem with this reasoning is that r is supposed is suppose to represent a growth rate of 100% as in the article. How do you know in advance that r in the differential equation will be different? This DE is derived in the course from the fact that $P(t+Delta t) - P(t) = rP(t)Delta t$ which is a priori found by simple book-keeping. Intuitively for me, this r of 100% should lead to a function such as $2^t$ and not $e^t$. That is what bugs me.
– Dory
Sep 20 '16 at 13:29
My problem with this reasoning is that r is supposed is suppose to represent a growth rate of 100% as in the article. How do you know in advance that r in the differential equation will be different? This DE is derived in the course from the fact that $P(t+Delta t) - P(t) = rP(t)Delta t$ which is a priori found by simple book-keeping. Intuitively for me, this r of 100% should lead to a function such as $2^t$ and not $e^t$. That is what bugs me.
– Dory
Sep 20 '16 at 13:29
That web page is wrong about the bacteria. You do not start at time $0$ with a bunch of "Mr. Blue" bacteria of which every one is about to start spawning a new "Mr. Green." An actual colony of bacteria has bacteria in every stage of reproduction at any given time, so you are (almost) continuously getting new bacteria. It actually works more like the compound-interest-on-money example that is shown after the bacteria.
– David K
Sep 20 '16 at 13:38
That web page is wrong about the bacteria. You do not start at time $0$ with a bunch of "Mr. Blue" bacteria of which every one is about to start spawning a new "Mr. Green." An actual colony of bacteria has bacteria in every stage of reproduction at any given time, so you are (almost) continuously getting new bacteria. It actually works more like the compound-interest-on-money example that is shown after the bacteria.
– David K
Sep 20 '16 at 13:38
@DavidK But isn't it true that a not completely born/formed bacteria cannot start to divide into two bacterial?
– Dory
Sep 20 '16 at 13:43
@DavidK But isn't it true that a not completely born/formed bacteria cannot start to divide into two bacterial?
– Dory
Sep 20 '16 at 13:43
It's also important to realise that these equations are only simple models of what is happening and won't necessarily be exact in the real world. Also note that having $r$ as an unknown still includes the possibility that $r$ relates to 100%, but it also includes the possibility that it has another value.
– EHH
Sep 20 '16 at 14:19
It's also important to realise that these equations are only simple models of what is happening and won't necessarily be exact in the real world. Also note that having $r$ as an unknown still includes the possibility that $r$ relates to 100%, but it also includes the possibility that it has another value.
– EHH
Sep 20 '16 at 14:19
@Dory it is not the incompletely formed bacteria that divide. My point is that if the bacteria divide once every 60 seconds, then at any instant that you look at the colony there will be some bacteria that last divided 59 seconds ago and have just 1 second left before they finish dividing again, some that divided 58 seconds, ago, and so forth. By the way, there will be almost twice as many that divided 1 second ago as the number that divided 59 seconds ago.
– David K
Sep 20 '16 at 15:15
@Dory it is not the incompletely formed bacteria that divide. My point is that if the bacteria divide once every 60 seconds, then at any instant that you look at the colony there will be some bacteria that last divided 59 seconds ago and have just 1 second left before they finish dividing again, some that divided 58 seconds, ago, and so forth. By the way, there will be almost twice as many that divided 1 second ago as the number that divided 59 seconds ago.
– David K
Sep 20 '16 at 15:15
|
show 3 more comments
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1934188%2fbacteria-population-growth-confusion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1934188%2fbacteria-population-growth-confusion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
My problem with this reasoning is that r is supposed is suppose to represent a growth rate of 100% as in the article. How do you know in advance that r in the differential equation will be different? This DE is derived in the course from the fact that $P(t+Delta t) - P(t) = rP(t)Delta t$ which is a priori found by simple book-keeping. Intuitively for me, this r of 100% should lead to a function such as $2^t$ and not $e^t$. That is what bugs me.
– Dory
Sep 20 '16 at 13:29
That web page is wrong about the bacteria. You do not start at time $0$ with a bunch of "Mr. Blue" bacteria of which every one is about to start spawning a new "Mr. Green." An actual colony of bacteria has bacteria in every stage of reproduction at any given time, so you are (almost) continuously getting new bacteria. It actually works more like the compound-interest-on-money example that is shown after the bacteria.
– David K
Sep 20 '16 at 13:38
@DavidK But isn't it true that a not completely born/formed bacteria cannot start to divide into two bacterial?
– Dory
Sep 20 '16 at 13:43
It's also important to realise that these equations are only simple models of what is happening and won't necessarily be exact in the real world. Also note that having $r$ as an unknown still includes the possibility that $r$ relates to 100%, but it also includes the possibility that it has another value.
– EHH
Sep 20 '16 at 14:19
@Dory it is not the incompletely formed bacteria that divide. My point is that if the bacteria divide once every 60 seconds, then at any instant that you look at the colony there will be some bacteria that last divided 59 seconds ago and have just 1 second left before they finish dividing again, some that divided 58 seconds, ago, and so forth. By the way, there will be almost twice as many that divided 1 second ago as the number that divided 59 seconds ago.
– David K
Sep 20 '16 at 15:15