What's the probability to select socks of the same color?
$begingroup$
I'm sorry if this has been answered before already.
There's a drawer with 20 black socks and 20 white socks. We take one sock. What's the probability that the randomly chosen second sock has the same color as the second one?
I have two ways of thinking about it:
The color of the first sock doesn't really matter, in any case, there're 19 socks of the same color left in the drawer and 39 in total. So that answer is $frac{19}{39}$.
We have two cases: the first sock was black or it was white. The probability of taking white sock after white sock is equal to the probability of taking black sock after black sock and is equal to $frac{19}{39}$. The probability that the first sock is black is the same that it's white and is 0.5.
In general case we can apply The Law of Total Probability:
begin{equation}
frac{19}{39} * 0.5 + frac{19}{39} * 0.5 = frac{19}{39}
end{equation}
Does this reasoning make sense?
probability
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm sorry if this has been answered before already.
There's a drawer with 20 black socks and 20 white socks. We take one sock. What's the probability that the randomly chosen second sock has the same color as the second one?
I have two ways of thinking about it:
The color of the first sock doesn't really matter, in any case, there're 19 socks of the same color left in the drawer and 39 in total. So that answer is $frac{19}{39}$.
We have two cases: the first sock was black or it was white. The probability of taking white sock after white sock is equal to the probability of taking black sock after black sock and is equal to $frac{19}{39}$. The probability that the first sock is black is the same that it's white and is 0.5.
In general case we can apply The Law of Total Probability:
begin{equation}
frac{19}{39} * 0.5 + frac{19}{39} * 0.5 = frac{19}{39}
end{equation}
Does this reasoning make sense?
probability
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is essentially the same answer twice, right both times.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Jan 12 at 18:11
$begingroup$
@EthanBolker yes, the second would be more useful if the were 20 black and 10 white socks for example
$endgroup$
– mighter
Jan 12 at 18:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm sorry if this has been answered before already.
There's a drawer with 20 black socks and 20 white socks. We take one sock. What's the probability that the randomly chosen second sock has the same color as the second one?
I have two ways of thinking about it:
The color of the first sock doesn't really matter, in any case, there're 19 socks of the same color left in the drawer and 39 in total. So that answer is $frac{19}{39}$.
We have two cases: the first sock was black or it was white. The probability of taking white sock after white sock is equal to the probability of taking black sock after black sock and is equal to $frac{19}{39}$. The probability that the first sock is black is the same that it's white and is 0.5.
In general case we can apply The Law of Total Probability:
begin{equation}
frac{19}{39} * 0.5 + frac{19}{39} * 0.5 = frac{19}{39}
end{equation}
Does this reasoning make sense?
probability
$endgroup$
I'm sorry if this has been answered before already.
There's a drawer with 20 black socks and 20 white socks. We take one sock. What's the probability that the randomly chosen second sock has the same color as the second one?
I have two ways of thinking about it:
The color of the first sock doesn't really matter, in any case, there're 19 socks of the same color left in the drawer and 39 in total. So that answer is $frac{19}{39}$.
We have two cases: the first sock was black or it was white. The probability of taking white sock after white sock is equal to the probability of taking black sock after black sock and is equal to $frac{19}{39}$. The probability that the first sock is black is the same that it's white and is 0.5.
In general case we can apply The Law of Total Probability:
begin{equation}
frac{19}{39} * 0.5 + frac{19}{39} * 0.5 = frac{19}{39}
end{equation}
Does this reasoning make sense?
probability
probability
asked Jan 12 at 18:07
mightermighter
132
132
$begingroup$
This is essentially the same answer twice, right both times.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Jan 12 at 18:11
$begingroup$
@EthanBolker yes, the second would be more useful if the were 20 black and 10 white socks for example
$endgroup$
– mighter
Jan 12 at 18:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is essentially the same answer twice, right both times.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Jan 12 at 18:11
$begingroup$
@EthanBolker yes, the second would be more useful if the were 20 black and 10 white socks for example
$endgroup$
– mighter
Jan 12 at 18:17
$begingroup$
This is essentially the same answer twice, right both times.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Jan 12 at 18:11
$begingroup$
This is essentially the same answer twice, right both times.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Jan 12 at 18:11
$begingroup$
@EthanBolker yes, the second would be more useful if the were 20 black and 10 white socks for example
$endgroup$
– mighter
Jan 12 at 18:17
$begingroup$
@EthanBolker yes, the second would be more useful if the were 20 black and 10 white socks for example
$endgroup$
– mighter
Jan 12 at 18:17
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let us denote by $B_{k}$ the event "a black sock has been chosen in the $k$-th selection". The same applies to $W_{k}$. Thus we are interested in the event $(B_{1}cap B_{2})cup(W_{1}cap W_{2})$, where $B_{1}cap B_{2}$ and $W_{1}cap W_{2}$ are disjoint. Therefore we have
begin{align*}
textbf{P}((B_{1}cap B_{2})cup(W_{1}cap W_{2})) & = textbf{P}(B_{1}cap B_{2}) + textbf{P}(W_{1}cap W_{2})\
& = textbf{P}(B_{2}|B_{1})textbf{P}(B_{1}) + textbf{P}(W_{2}|W_{1})textbf{P}(W_{1})\
& = frac{C(19,1)}{C(39,1)}timesfrac{C(20,1)}{C(40,1)} + frac{C(19,1)}{C(39,1)}timesfrac{C(20,1)}{C(40,1)}\
& = frac{19}{39}timesfrac{1}{2} + frac{19}{39}timesfrac{1}{2} = frac{19}{39}
end{align*}
This is a more "systematic" way to describe the problem. Hope this helps.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Both the reasonings are correct. Consider the case when all balls socks $s_1,dots, s_{40}$ are of different colors. First, the probability of selecting a sock of a particular color is $frac{1}{40}$. Second, the probability of selecting a sock of a particular color from the rest of the 39 socks is $frac{1}{39}$.
Now apply counting principle. Since in $s_1,dots, s_{40}$ there are 20 of the same color (black), the probability of the first event is $20 times frac{1}{40}=frac{1}{2}$. Thus the probability of getting a black sock in the first event is $frac{1}{2}$, similarly, the probability of getting a white sock in the first event is $frac{1}{2}$.
For the second event, you have two cases, either the sock in the first event is black or white. Thus the probability is $2timesfrac{1}{2}times frac{19}{40}=frac{19}{40}$. The only difference is that your first answer is not using the counting principal whereas the second answer does.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could you explain more?
$endgroup$
– Larry
Jan 12 at 18:52
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071206%2fwhats-the-probability-to-select-socks-of-the-same-color%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let us denote by $B_{k}$ the event "a black sock has been chosen in the $k$-th selection". The same applies to $W_{k}$. Thus we are interested in the event $(B_{1}cap B_{2})cup(W_{1}cap W_{2})$, where $B_{1}cap B_{2}$ and $W_{1}cap W_{2}$ are disjoint. Therefore we have
begin{align*}
textbf{P}((B_{1}cap B_{2})cup(W_{1}cap W_{2})) & = textbf{P}(B_{1}cap B_{2}) + textbf{P}(W_{1}cap W_{2})\
& = textbf{P}(B_{2}|B_{1})textbf{P}(B_{1}) + textbf{P}(W_{2}|W_{1})textbf{P}(W_{1})\
& = frac{C(19,1)}{C(39,1)}timesfrac{C(20,1)}{C(40,1)} + frac{C(19,1)}{C(39,1)}timesfrac{C(20,1)}{C(40,1)}\
& = frac{19}{39}timesfrac{1}{2} + frac{19}{39}timesfrac{1}{2} = frac{19}{39}
end{align*}
This is a more "systematic" way to describe the problem. Hope this helps.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let us denote by $B_{k}$ the event "a black sock has been chosen in the $k$-th selection". The same applies to $W_{k}$. Thus we are interested in the event $(B_{1}cap B_{2})cup(W_{1}cap W_{2})$, where $B_{1}cap B_{2}$ and $W_{1}cap W_{2}$ are disjoint. Therefore we have
begin{align*}
textbf{P}((B_{1}cap B_{2})cup(W_{1}cap W_{2})) & = textbf{P}(B_{1}cap B_{2}) + textbf{P}(W_{1}cap W_{2})\
& = textbf{P}(B_{2}|B_{1})textbf{P}(B_{1}) + textbf{P}(W_{2}|W_{1})textbf{P}(W_{1})\
& = frac{C(19,1)}{C(39,1)}timesfrac{C(20,1)}{C(40,1)} + frac{C(19,1)}{C(39,1)}timesfrac{C(20,1)}{C(40,1)}\
& = frac{19}{39}timesfrac{1}{2} + frac{19}{39}timesfrac{1}{2} = frac{19}{39}
end{align*}
This is a more "systematic" way to describe the problem. Hope this helps.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let us denote by $B_{k}$ the event "a black sock has been chosen in the $k$-th selection". The same applies to $W_{k}$. Thus we are interested in the event $(B_{1}cap B_{2})cup(W_{1}cap W_{2})$, where $B_{1}cap B_{2}$ and $W_{1}cap W_{2}$ are disjoint. Therefore we have
begin{align*}
textbf{P}((B_{1}cap B_{2})cup(W_{1}cap W_{2})) & = textbf{P}(B_{1}cap B_{2}) + textbf{P}(W_{1}cap W_{2})\
& = textbf{P}(B_{2}|B_{1})textbf{P}(B_{1}) + textbf{P}(W_{2}|W_{1})textbf{P}(W_{1})\
& = frac{C(19,1)}{C(39,1)}timesfrac{C(20,1)}{C(40,1)} + frac{C(19,1)}{C(39,1)}timesfrac{C(20,1)}{C(40,1)}\
& = frac{19}{39}timesfrac{1}{2} + frac{19}{39}timesfrac{1}{2} = frac{19}{39}
end{align*}
This is a more "systematic" way to describe the problem. Hope this helps.
$endgroup$
Let us denote by $B_{k}$ the event "a black sock has been chosen in the $k$-th selection". The same applies to $W_{k}$. Thus we are interested in the event $(B_{1}cap B_{2})cup(W_{1}cap W_{2})$, where $B_{1}cap B_{2}$ and $W_{1}cap W_{2}$ are disjoint. Therefore we have
begin{align*}
textbf{P}((B_{1}cap B_{2})cup(W_{1}cap W_{2})) & = textbf{P}(B_{1}cap B_{2}) + textbf{P}(W_{1}cap W_{2})\
& = textbf{P}(B_{2}|B_{1})textbf{P}(B_{1}) + textbf{P}(W_{2}|W_{1})textbf{P}(W_{1})\
& = frac{C(19,1)}{C(39,1)}timesfrac{C(20,1)}{C(40,1)} + frac{C(19,1)}{C(39,1)}timesfrac{C(20,1)}{C(40,1)}\
& = frac{19}{39}timesfrac{1}{2} + frac{19}{39}timesfrac{1}{2} = frac{19}{39}
end{align*}
This is a more "systematic" way to describe the problem. Hope this helps.
edited Jan 12 at 18:25
answered Jan 12 at 18:18
user1337user1337
43010
43010
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Both the reasonings are correct. Consider the case when all balls socks $s_1,dots, s_{40}$ are of different colors. First, the probability of selecting a sock of a particular color is $frac{1}{40}$. Second, the probability of selecting a sock of a particular color from the rest of the 39 socks is $frac{1}{39}$.
Now apply counting principle. Since in $s_1,dots, s_{40}$ there are 20 of the same color (black), the probability of the first event is $20 times frac{1}{40}=frac{1}{2}$. Thus the probability of getting a black sock in the first event is $frac{1}{2}$, similarly, the probability of getting a white sock in the first event is $frac{1}{2}$.
For the second event, you have two cases, either the sock in the first event is black or white. Thus the probability is $2timesfrac{1}{2}times frac{19}{40}=frac{19}{40}$. The only difference is that your first answer is not using the counting principal whereas the second answer does.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could you explain more?
$endgroup$
– Larry
Jan 12 at 18:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Both the reasonings are correct. Consider the case when all balls socks $s_1,dots, s_{40}$ are of different colors. First, the probability of selecting a sock of a particular color is $frac{1}{40}$. Second, the probability of selecting a sock of a particular color from the rest of the 39 socks is $frac{1}{39}$.
Now apply counting principle. Since in $s_1,dots, s_{40}$ there are 20 of the same color (black), the probability of the first event is $20 times frac{1}{40}=frac{1}{2}$. Thus the probability of getting a black sock in the first event is $frac{1}{2}$, similarly, the probability of getting a white sock in the first event is $frac{1}{2}$.
For the second event, you have two cases, either the sock in the first event is black or white. Thus the probability is $2timesfrac{1}{2}times frac{19}{40}=frac{19}{40}$. The only difference is that your first answer is not using the counting principal whereas the second answer does.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could you explain more?
$endgroup$
– Larry
Jan 12 at 18:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Both the reasonings are correct. Consider the case when all balls socks $s_1,dots, s_{40}$ are of different colors. First, the probability of selecting a sock of a particular color is $frac{1}{40}$. Second, the probability of selecting a sock of a particular color from the rest of the 39 socks is $frac{1}{39}$.
Now apply counting principle. Since in $s_1,dots, s_{40}$ there are 20 of the same color (black), the probability of the first event is $20 times frac{1}{40}=frac{1}{2}$. Thus the probability of getting a black sock in the first event is $frac{1}{2}$, similarly, the probability of getting a white sock in the first event is $frac{1}{2}$.
For the second event, you have two cases, either the sock in the first event is black or white. Thus the probability is $2timesfrac{1}{2}times frac{19}{40}=frac{19}{40}$. The only difference is that your first answer is not using the counting principal whereas the second answer does.
$endgroup$
Both the reasonings are correct. Consider the case when all balls socks $s_1,dots, s_{40}$ are of different colors. First, the probability of selecting a sock of a particular color is $frac{1}{40}$. Second, the probability of selecting a sock of a particular color from the rest of the 39 socks is $frac{1}{39}$.
Now apply counting principle. Since in $s_1,dots, s_{40}$ there are 20 of the same color (black), the probability of the first event is $20 times frac{1}{40}=frac{1}{2}$. Thus the probability of getting a black sock in the first event is $frac{1}{2}$, similarly, the probability of getting a white sock in the first event is $frac{1}{2}$.
For the second event, you have two cases, either the sock in the first event is black or white. Thus the probability is $2timesfrac{1}{2}times frac{19}{40}=frac{19}{40}$. The only difference is that your first answer is not using the counting principal whereas the second answer does.
edited Jan 13 at 5:44
answered Jan 12 at 18:12
Ranveer SinghRanveer Singh
209210
209210
$begingroup$
Could you explain more?
$endgroup$
– Larry
Jan 12 at 18:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Could you explain more?
$endgroup$
– Larry
Jan 12 at 18:52
$begingroup$
Could you explain more?
$endgroup$
– Larry
Jan 12 at 18:52
$begingroup$
Could you explain more?
$endgroup$
– Larry
Jan 12 at 18:52
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071206%2fwhats-the-probability-to-select-socks-of-the-same-color%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
This is essentially the same answer twice, right both times.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Jan 12 at 18:11
$begingroup$
@EthanBolker yes, the second would be more useful if the were 20 black and 10 white socks for example
$endgroup$
– mighter
Jan 12 at 18:17