How total derivative of a function works and what is the derivation of the formula?












-1














If f is a function of $(x,y,z)$ then the total derivative is



$$d f = frac { partial f } { partial x } d x + frac { partial f } { partial y } d y + frac { partial f } { partial z } d z$$



but what is the derivation of the formula?
an user also explains the derivation in a similar question on this platform here



deriving the formula of total derivative of a multi-variable function



But the answer is too complex.Can someone explain this in a simpler way please?thanks .










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Please see this to get a clearer understanding.
    – Apoorv Khurasia
    Dec 30 '18 at 7:16


















-1














If f is a function of $(x,y,z)$ then the total derivative is



$$d f = frac { partial f } { partial x } d x + frac { partial f } { partial y } d y + frac { partial f } { partial z } d z$$



but what is the derivation of the formula?
an user also explains the derivation in a similar question on this platform here



deriving the formula of total derivative of a multi-variable function



But the answer is too complex.Can someone explain this in a simpler way please?thanks .










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Please see this to get a clearer understanding.
    – Apoorv Khurasia
    Dec 30 '18 at 7:16
















-1












-1








-1


2





If f is a function of $(x,y,z)$ then the total derivative is



$$d f = frac { partial f } { partial x } d x + frac { partial f } { partial y } d y + frac { partial f } { partial z } d z$$



but what is the derivation of the formula?
an user also explains the derivation in a similar question on this platform here



deriving the formula of total derivative of a multi-variable function



But the answer is too complex.Can someone explain this in a simpler way please?thanks .










share|cite|improve this question















If f is a function of $(x,y,z)$ then the total derivative is



$$d f = frac { partial f } { partial x } d x + frac { partial f } { partial y } d y + frac { partial f } { partial z } d z$$



but what is the derivation of the formula?
an user also explains the derivation in a similar question on this platform here



deriving the formula of total derivative of a multi-variable function



But the answer is too complex.Can someone explain this in a simpler way please?thanks .







calculus multivariable-calculus functions derivatives






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 2 at 12:02







Hawkingo

















asked Dec 30 '18 at 5:03









HawkingoHawkingo

12




12












  • Please see this to get a clearer understanding.
    – Apoorv Khurasia
    Dec 30 '18 at 7:16




















  • Please see this to get a clearer understanding.
    – Apoorv Khurasia
    Dec 30 '18 at 7:16


















Please see this to get a clearer understanding.
– Apoorv Khurasia
Dec 30 '18 at 7:16






Please see this to get a clearer understanding.
– Apoorv Khurasia
Dec 30 '18 at 7:16












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














I'm not sure whether you know what $df$ and the $dx_i$ are. Unless you arrive at the "official vue of things 2019" you cannot understand the formula in your question, let alone its proof. Hence, in the first place you have to have a good understanding of $df$ and the $dx_i$ as mathematical objects!



A differentiable function $$f:quad {bf R}^3to{mathbb R},qquad(x_1,x_2,x_3)mapsto f(x_1,x_2,x_3)$$ has at each point ${bf p}$ a derivative $df({bf p})$. This derivative is a linear function $$df({bf p}):quad T_{bf p}to{mathbb R},qquad{bf X}to df({bf p}).{bf X} ,$$ whereby ${bf X}=(X_1,X_2,X_3)$ is a variable ("small") increment (or tangent) vector attached at ${bf p}$. This function has the property that it linearly approximates function value increments $f({bf p}+{bf X})-f({bf p})$ as follows:
$$f({bf p}+{bf X})-f({bf p})=df({bf p}).{bf X}+o(|{bf X}|) qquad({bf X}to{bf 0}) .$$
Doing all computations etc. one arrives at the simple formula
$$df({bf p}).{bf X}={partial fover partial x_1}({bf p})>X_1+{partial fover partial x_2}({bf p})>X_2+{partial fover partial x_3}({bf p})>X_3 .tag{1}$$
This formula shows how the linear map $df({bf p})$ is related to the partial derivatives (or to the Jacobian) of $f$. Now for the coordinate functions $x_i$ $(1leq ileq3)$ one has
$$x_i({bf p}+{bf X})-x_i({bf p})=X_i$$ without error term. It follows that $$dx_i.{bf X}=X_iqquad (1leq ileq 3)>,$$ so that we can rewrite $(1)$ as
$$df({bf p}).{bf X}={partial fover partial x_1}({bf p}) dx_1.{bf X}+{partial fover partial x_2}({bf p}) dx_2.{bf X}+{partial fover partial x_3}({bf p}) dx_3.{bf X} .$$ Since this is true for all tangent vectors ${bf X}in T_{bf p}$ this shows that
$$df({bf p})={partial fover partial x_1}({bf p}),dx_1+{partial fover partial x_2}({bf p}),dx_2+{partial fover partial x_3}({bf p}),dx_3tag{2}$$
at every point ${bf p}$ in the domain of $f$. Omitting the ${bf p}$ the formula $(2)$ then can be abbreviated to
$$df={partial fover partial x_1} dx_1+{partial fover partial x_2} dx_2+{partial fover partial x_3} dx_3 .tag{3}$$
The formulas $(2)$, resp. $(3)$, say that at each point ${bf p}$ in the domain of $f$ the derivative $df({bf p})$ is a certain linear combination of the coordinate differentials $dx_i$, whereby the appearing coefficients are just the partial derivatives of $f$ at ${bf p}$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • sorry,I didn't understand your steps.Can you explain me a bit clearly.sorry my math is a little weak.
    – Hawkingo
    Jan 6 at 13:16











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056517%2fhow-total-derivative-of-a-function-works-and-what-is-the-derivation-of-the-formu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














I'm not sure whether you know what $df$ and the $dx_i$ are. Unless you arrive at the "official vue of things 2019" you cannot understand the formula in your question, let alone its proof. Hence, in the first place you have to have a good understanding of $df$ and the $dx_i$ as mathematical objects!



A differentiable function $$f:quad {bf R}^3to{mathbb R},qquad(x_1,x_2,x_3)mapsto f(x_1,x_2,x_3)$$ has at each point ${bf p}$ a derivative $df({bf p})$. This derivative is a linear function $$df({bf p}):quad T_{bf p}to{mathbb R},qquad{bf X}to df({bf p}).{bf X} ,$$ whereby ${bf X}=(X_1,X_2,X_3)$ is a variable ("small") increment (or tangent) vector attached at ${bf p}$. This function has the property that it linearly approximates function value increments $f({bf p}+{bf X})-f({bf p})$ as follows:
$$f({bf p}+{bf X})-f({bf p})=df({bf p}).{bf X}+o(|{bf X}|) qquad({bf X}to{bf 0}) .$$
Doing all computations etc. one arrives at the simple formula
$$df({bf p}).{bf X}={partial fover partial x_1}({bf p})>X_1+{partial fover partial x_2}({bf p})>X_2+{partial fover partial x_3}({bf p})>X_3 .tag{1}$$
This formula shows how the linear map $df({bf p})$ is related to the partial derivatives (or to the Jacobian) of $f$. Now for the coordinate functions $x_i$ $(1leq ileq3)$ one has
$$x_i({bf p}+{bf X})-x_i({bf p})=X_i$$ without error term. It follows that $$dx_i.{bf X}=X_iqquad (1leq ileq 3)>,$$ so that we can rewrite $(1)$ as
$$df({bf p}).{bf X}={partial fover partial x_1}({bf p}) dx_1.{bf X}+{partial fover partial x_2}({bf p}) dx_2.{bf X}+{partial fover partial x_3}({bf p}) dx_3.{bf X} .$$ Since this is true for all tangent vectors ${bf X}in T_{bf p}$ this shows that
$$df({bf p})={partial fover partial x_1}({bf p}),dx_1+{partial fover partial x_2}({bf p}),dx_2+{partial fover partial x_3}({bf p}),dx_3tag{2}$$
at every point ${bf p}$ in the domain of $f$. Omitting the ${bf p}$ the formula $(2)$ then can be abbreviated to
$$df={partial fover partial x_1} dx_1+{partial fover partial x_2} dx_2+{partial fover partial x_3} dx_3 .tag{3}$$
The formulas $(2)$, resp. $(3)$, say that at each point ${bf p}$ in the domain of $f$ the derivative $df({bf p})$ is a certain linear combination of the coordinate differentials $dx_i$, whereby the appearing coefficients are just the partial derivatives of $f$ at ${bf p}$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • sorry,I didn't understand your steps.Can you explain me a bit clearly.sorry my math is a little weak.
    – Hawkingo
    Jan 6 at 13:16
















1














I'm not sure whether you know what $df$ and the $dx_i$ are. Unless you arrive at the "official vue of things 2019" you cannot understand the formula in your question, let alone its proof. Hence, in the first place you have to have a good understanding of $df$ and the $dx_i$ as mathematical objects!



A differentiable function $$f:quad {bf R}^3to{mathbb R},qquad(x_1,x_2,x_3)mapsto f(x_1,x_2,x_3)$$ has at each point ${bf p}$ a derivative $df({bf p})$. This derivative is a linear function $$df({bf p}):quad T_{bf p}to{mathbb R},qquad{bf X}to df({bf p}).{bf X} ,$$ whereby ${bf X}=(X_1,X_2,X_3)$ is a variable ("small") increment (or tangent) vector attached at ${bf p}$. This function has the property that it linearly approximates function value increments $f({bf p}+{bf X})-f({bf p})$ as follows:
$$f({bf p}+{bf X})-f({bf p})=df({bf p}).{bf X}+o(|{bf X}|) qquad({bf X}to{bf 0}) .$$
Doing all computations etc. one arrives at the simple formula
$$df({bf p}).{bf X}={partial fover partial x_1}({bf p})>X_1+{partial fover partial x_2}({bf p})>X_2+{partial fover partial x_3}({bf p})>X_3 .tag{1}$$
This formula shows how the linear map $df({bf p})$ is related to the partial derivatives (or to the Jacobian) of $f$. Now for the coordinate functions $x_i$ $(1leq ileq3)$ one has
$$x_i({bf p}+{bf X})-x_i({bf p})=X_i$$ without error term. It follows that $$dx_i.{bf X}=X_iqquad (1leq ileq 3)>,$$ so that we can rewrite $(1)$ as
$$df({bf p}).{bf X}={partial fover partial x_1}({bf p}) dx_1.{bf X}+{partial fover partial x_2}({bf p}) dx_2.{bf X}+{partial fover partial x_3}({bf p}) dx_3.{bf X} .$$ Since this is true for all tangent vectors ${bf X}in T_{bf p}$ this shows that
$$df({bf p})={partial fover partial x_1}({bf p}),dx_1+{partial fover partial x_2}({bf p}),dx_2+{partial fover partial x_3}({bf p}),dx_3tag{2}$$
at every point ${bf p}$ in the domain of $f$. Omitting the ${bf p}$ the formula $(2)$ then can be abbreviated to
$$df={partial fover partial x_1} dx_1+{partial fover partial x_2} dx_2+{partial fover partial x_3} dx_3 .tag{3}$$
The formulas $(2)$, resp. $(3)$, say that at each point ${bf p}$ in the domain of $f$ the derivative $df({bf p})$ is a certain linear combination of the coordinate differentials $dx_i$, whereby the appearing coefficients are just the partial derivatives of $f$ at ${bf p}$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • sorry,I didn't understand your steps.Can you explain me a bit clearly.sorry my math is a little weak.
    – Hawkingo
    Jan 6 at 13:16














1












1








1






I'm not sure whether you know what $df$ and the $dx_i$ are. Unless you arrive at the "official vue of things 2019" you cannot understand the formula in your question, let alone its proof. Hence, in the first place you have to have a good understanding of $df$ and the $dx_i$ as mathematical objects!



A differentiable function $$f:quad {bf R}^3to{mathbb R},qquad(x_1,x_2,x_3)mapsto f(x_1,x_2,x_3)$$ has at each point ${bf p}$ a derivative $df({bf p})$. This derivative is a linear function $$df({bf p}):quad T_{bf p}to{mathbb R},qquad{bf X}to df({bf p}).{bf X} ,$$ whereby ${bf X}=(X_1,X_2,X_3)$ is a variable ("small") increment (or tangent) vector attached at ${bf p}$. This function has the property that it linearly approximates function value increments $f({bf p}+{bf X})-f({bf p})$ as follows:
$$f({bf p}+{bf X})-f({bf p})=df({bf p}).{bf X}+o(|{bf X}|) qquad({bf X}to{bf 0}) .$$
Doing all computations etc. one arrives at the simple formula
$$df({bf p}).{bf X}={partial fover partial x_1}({bf p})>X_1+{partial fover partial x_2}({bf p})>X_2+{partial fover partial x_3}({bf p})>X_3 .tag{1}$$
This formula shows how the linear map $df({bf p})$ is related to the partial derivatives (or to the Jacobian) of $f$. Now for the coordinate functions $x_i$ $(1leq ileq3)$ one has
$$x_i({bf p}+{bf X})-x_i({bf p})=X_i$$ without error term. It follows that $$dx_i.{bf X}=X_iqquad (1leq ileq 3)>,$$ so that we can rewrite $(1)$ as
$$df({bf p}).{bf X}={partial fover partial x_1}({bf p}) dx_1.{bf X}+{partial fover partial x_2}({bf p}) dx_2.{bf X}+{partial fover partial x_3}({bf p}) dx_3.{bf X} .$$ Since this is true for all tangent vectors ${bf X}in T_{bf p}$ this shows that
$$df({bf p})={partial fover partial x_1}({bf p}),dx_1+{partial fover partial x_2}({bf p}),dx_2+{partial fover partial x_3}({bf p}),dx_3tag{2}$$
at every point ${bf p}$ in the domain of $f$. Omitting the ${bf p}$ the formula $(2)$ then can be abbreviated to
$$df={partial fover partial x_1} dx_1+{partial fover partial x_2} dx_2+{partial fover partial x_3} dx_3 .tag{3}$$
The formulas $(2)$, resp. $(3)$, say that at each point ${bf p}$ in the domain of $f$ the derivative $df({bf p})$ is a certain linear combination of the coordinate differentials $dx_i$, whereby the appearing coefficients are just the partial derivatives of $f$ at ${bf p}$.






share|cite|improve this answer














I'm not sure whether you know what $df$ and the $dx_i$ are. Unless you arrive at the "official vue of things 2019" you cannot understand the formula in your question, let alone its proof. Hence, in the first place you have to have a good understanding of $df$ and the $dx_i$ as mathematical objects!



A differentiable function $$f:quad {bf R}^3to{mathbb R},qquad(x_1,x_2,x_3)mapsto f(x_1,x_2,x_3)$$ has at each point ${bf p}$ a derivative $df({bf p})$. This derivative is a linear function $$df({bf p}):quad T_{bf p}to{mathbb R},qquad{bf X}to df({bf p}).{bf X} ,$$ whereby ${bf X}=(X_1,X_2,X_3)$ is a variable ("small") increment (or tangent) vector attached at ${bf p}$. This function has the property that it linearly approximates function value increments $f({bf p}+{bf X})-f({bf p})$ as follows:
$$f({bf p}+{bf X})-f({bf p})=df({bf p}).{bf X}+o(|{bf X}|) qquad({bf X}to{bf 0}) .$$
Doing all computations etc. one arrives at the simple formula
$$df({bf p}).{bf X}={partial fover partial x_1}({bf p})>X_1+{partial fover partial x_2}({bf p})>X_2+{partial fover partial x_3}({bf p})>X_3 .tag{1}$$
This formula shows how the linear map $df({bf p})$ is related to the partial derivatives (or to the Jacobian) of $f$. Now for the coordinate functions $x_i$ $(1leq ileq3)$ one has
$$x_i({bf p}+{bf X})-x_i({bf p})=X_i$$ without error term. It follows that $$dx_i.{bf X}=X_iqquad (1leq ileq 3)>,$$ so that we can rewrite $(1)$ as
$$df({bf p}).{bf X}={partial fover partial x_1}({bf p}) dx_1.{bf X}+{partial fover partial x_2}({bf p}) dx_2.{bf X}+{partial fover partial x_3}({bf p}) dx_3.{bf X} .$$ Since this is true for all tangent vectors ${bf X}in T_{bf p}$ this shows that
$$df({bf p})={partial fover partial x_1}({bf p}),dx_1+{partial fover partial x_2}({bf p}),dx_2+{partial fover partial x_3}({bf p}),dx_3tag{2}$$
at every point ${bf p}$ in the domain of $f$. Omitting the ${bf p}$ the formula $(2)$ then can be abbreviated to
$$df={partial fover partial x_1} dx_1+{partial fover partial x_2} dx_2+{partial fover partial x_3} dx_3 .tag{3}$$
The formulas $(2)$, resp. $(3)$, say that at each point ${bf p}$ in the domain of $f$ the derivative $df({bf p})$ is a certain linear combination of the coordinate differentials $dx_i$, whereby the appearing coefficients are just the partial derivatives of $f$ at ${bf p}$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 11 hours ago

























answered Jan 2 at 19:24









Christian BlatterChristian Blatter

172k7113326




172k7113326












  • sorry,I didn't understand your steps.Can you explain me a bit clearly.sorry my math is a little weak.
    – Hawkingo
    Jan 6 at 13:16


















  • sorry,I didn't understand your steps.Can you explain me a bit clearly.sorry my math is a little weak.
    – Hawkingo
    Jan 6 at 13:16
















sorry,I didn't understand your steps.Can you explain me a bit clearly.sorry my math is a little weak.
– Hawkingo
Jan 6 at 13:16




sorry,I didn't understand your steps.Can you explain me a bit clearly.sorry my math is a little weak.
– Hawkingo
Jan 6 at 13:16


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056517%2fhow-total-derivative-of-a-function-works-and-what-is-the-derivation-of-the-formu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?