∀x(I(x) → ∃y(I(y) ∧ (x < y))), I(x): x is an integer
$begingroup$
∀x(I(x) → ∃y(I(y) ∧ (x < y))), I(x): x is an integer
Is the following a correct translation?
For all x, if x is an integer, then there exists an y such that y is an integer and x < y.
Is this a true or false statement? For numbers in R
discrete-mathematics predicate-logic quantifiers logic-translation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
∀x(I(x) → ∃y(I(y) ∧ (x < y))), I(x): x is an integer
Is the following a correct translation?
For all x, if x is an integer, then there exists an y such that y is an integer and x < y.
Is this a true or false statement? For numbers in R
discrete-mathematics predicate-logic quantifiers logic-translation
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
"Is this a true or false statement?" Really no idea ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 24 at 11:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
∀x(I(x) → ∃y(I(y) ∧ (x < y))), I(x): x is an integer
Is the following a correct translation?
For all x, if x is an integer, then there exists an y such that y is an integer and x < y.
Is this a true or false statement? For numbers in R
discrete-mathematics predicate-logic quantifiers logic-translation
$endgroup$
∀x(I(x) → ∃y(I(y) ∧ (x < y))), I(x): x is an integer
Is the following a correct translation?
For all x, if x is an integer, then there exists an y such that y is an integer and x < y.
Is this a true or false statement? For numbers in R
discrete-mathematics predicate-logic quantifiers logic-translation
discrete-mathematics predicate-logic quantifiers logic-translation
edited Jan 24 at 10:35
user635758
asked Jan 24 at 10:25
user635758user635758
163
163
$begingroup$
"Is this a true or false statement?" Really no idea ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 24 at 11:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"Is this a true or false statement?" Really no idea ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 24 at 11:00
$begingroup$
"Is this a true or false statement?" Really no idea ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 24 at 11:00
$begingroup$
"Is this a true or false statement?" Really no idea ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 24 at 11:00
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your translation is correct. Let $F_2(x,y)=x<y$,
$$forall x(I_1(x)toexists y(I_1(y)wedge F_2(x,y)))=forall x(overline{I_1(x)}veeexists y(I_1(y)wedge F_2(x,y)))=forall x(exists y(overline{I_1(x)}vee I_1(y))wedge exists y(overline{I_1(x)} vee F_2(x,y)))=forall xexists y(overline{I_1(x)}vee I_1(y))wedge forall xexists y(overline{I_1(x)} vee F_2(x,y))=[textrm{paste } I_1(x) textrm{ and } F_2(x,y);x,yin R]=(Tvee T) wedge(Tvee T)=T$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your translation is a direct symbol-by-symbol translation ... but no one actually speaks like that in English ... which is also why you have trouble understanding the sentence.
Here is a more fluent translation: "For every integer there is a greater integer"
Do you now see whether that is a true or false statement?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085702%2f%25e2%2588%2580xix-%25e2%2586%2592-%25e2%2588%2583yiy-%25e2%2588%25a7-x-y-ix-x-is-an-integer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your translation is correct. Let $F_2(x,y)=x<y$,
$$forall x(I_1(x)toexists y(I_1(y)wedge F_2(x,y)))=forall x(overline{I_1(x)}veeexists y(I_1(y)wedge F_2(x,y)))=forall x(exists y(overline{I_1(x)}vee I_1(y))wedge exists y(overline{I_1(x)} vee F_2(x,y)))=forall xexists y(overline{I_1(x)}vee I_1(y))wedge forall xexists y(overline{I_1(x)} vee F_2(x,y))=[textrm{paste } I_1(x) textrm{ and } F_2(x,y);x,yin R]=(Tvee T) wedge(Tvee T)=T$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your translation is correct. Let $F_2(x,y)=x<y$,
$$forall x(I_1(x)toexists y(I_1(y)wedge F_2(x,y)))=forall x(overline{I_1(x)}veeexists y(I_1(y)wedge F_2(x,y)))=forall x(exists y(overline{I_1(x)}vee I_1(y))wedge exists y(overline{I_1(x)} vee F_2(x,y)))=forall xexists y(overline{I_1(x)}vee I_1(y))wedge forall xexists y(overline{I_1(x)} vee F_2(x,y))=[textrm{paste } I_1(x) textrm{ and } F_2(x,y);x,yin R]=(Tvee T) wedge(Tvee T)=T$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your translation is correct. Let $F_2(x,y)=x<y$,
$$forall x(I_1(x)toexists y(I_1(y)wedge F_2(x,y)))=forall x(overline{I_1(x)}veeexists y(I_1(y)wedge F_2(x,y)))=forall x(exists y(overline{I_1(x)}vee I_1(y))wedge exists y(overline{I_1(x)} vee F_2(x,y)))=forall xexists y(overline{I_1(x)}vee I_1(y))wedge forall xexists y(overline{I_1(x)} vee F_2(x,y))=[textrm{paste } I_1(x) textrm{ and } F_2(x,y);x,yin R]=(Tvee T) wedge(Tvee T)=T$$
$endgroup$
Your translation is correct. Let $F_2(x,y)=x<y$,
$$forall x(I_1(x)toexists y(I_1(y)wedge F_2(x,y)))=forall x(overline{I_1(x)}veeexists y(I_1(y)wedge F_2(x,y)))=forall x(exists y(overline{I_1(x)}vee I_1(y))wedge exists y(overline{I_1(x)} vee F_2(x,y)))=forall xexists y(overline{I_1(x)}vee I_1(y))wedge forall xexists y(overline{I_1(x)} vee F_2(x,y))=[textrm{paste } I_1(x) textrm{ and } F_2(x,y);x,yin R]=(Tvee T) wedge(Tvee T)=T$$
answered Jan 24 at 11:17
Yauhen MardanYauhen Mardan
936
936
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your translation is a direct symbol-by-symbol translation ... but no one actually speaks like that in English ... which is also why you have trouble understanding the sentence.
Here is a more fluent translation: "For every integer there is a greater integer"
Do you now see whether that is a true or false statement?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your translation is a direct symbol-by-symbol translation ... but no one actually speaks like that in English ... which is also why you have trouble understanding the sentence.
Here is a more fluent translation: "For every integer there is a greater integer"
Do you now see whether that is a true or false statement?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your translation is a direct symbol-by-symbol translation ... but no one actually speaks like that in English ... which is also why you have trouble understanding the sentence.
Here is a more fluent translation: "For every integer there is a greater integer"
Do you now see whether that is a true or false statement?
$endgroup$
Your translation is a direct symbol-by-symbol translation ... but no one actually speaks like that in English ... which is also why you have trouble understanding the sentence.
Here is a more fluent translation: "For every integer there is a greater integer"
Do you now see whether that is a true or false statement?
answered Jan 24 at 16:02
Bram28Bram28
63.2k44793
63.2k44793
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085702%2f%25e2%2588%2580xix-%25e2%2586%2592-%25e2%2588%2583yiy-%25e2%2588%25a7-x-y-ix-x-is-an-integer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
"Is this a true or false statement?" Really no idea ?
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Jan 24 at 11:00