Find $lambda$ such that $f$ it is differentiable in zero and has a continuous derivative in zero












2












$begingroup$


I am trying to solve this task




Find $lambda>0$ such that $f=begin{cases}0& x=0\ |x|^{lambda}cdot sinfrac{1}{x} & xneq 0 end{cases}$



a) is differentiable in zero



b) has a continuous derivative in zero.




My try



a)
$$lim_{h rightarrow 0^+}frac{f(h)-f(0)}{h} = lim_{h rightarrow 0^+}frac{|h|^{lambda}}{h} cdot sinfrac{1}{h} = 0$$



$$lim_{h rightarrow 0^-}frac{f(h)-f(0)}{h} = lim_{h rightarrow 0^+}frac{|h|^{lambda}}{h} cdot sinfrac{1}{h} = 0$$
But there I have some doubts. It seems like $lambda$ does not matter there....


Moreover, can somebody give me hints to b)?
I think that I have do the same thing but this is unbelievable






real-analysis calculus limits derivatives continuity







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do you think the first limit exists if $lambda = 1/2?$
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Jan 23 at 0:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, it cannot exists - Does mean that $lambda - 1 > 0 $ ?
    $endgroup$
    – VirtualUser
    Jan 23 at 0:29










  • $begingroup$
    and in the second case we have the same situation?
    $endgroup$
    – VirtualUser
    Jan 23 at 0:29
















2












$begingroup$


I am trying to solve this task




Find $lambda>0$ such that $f=begin{cases}0& x=0\ |x|^{lambda}cdot sinfrac{1}{x} & xneq 0 end{cases}$



a) is differentiable in zero



b) has a continuous derivative in zero.




My try



a)
$$lim_{h rightarrow 0^+}frac{f(h)-f(0)}{h} = lim_{h rightarrow 0^+}frac{|h|^{lambda}}{h} cdot sinfrac{1}{h} = 0$$



$$lim_{h rightarrow 0^-}frac{f(h)-f(0)}{h} = lim_{h rightarrow 0^+}frac{|h|^{lambda}}{h} cdot sinfrac{1}{h} = 0$$
But there I have some doubts. It seems like $lambda$ does not matter there....


Moreover, can somebody give me hints to b)?
I think that I have do the same thing but this is unbelievable






real-analysis calculus limits derivatives continuity







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do you think the first limit exists if $lambda = 1/2?$
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Jan 23 at 0:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, it cannot exists - Does mean that $lambda - 1 > 0 $ ?
    $endgroup$
    – VirtualUser
    Jan 23 at 0:29










  • $begingroup$
    and in the second case we have the same situation?
    $endgroup$
    – VirtualUser
    Jan 23 at 0:29














2












2








2





$begingroup$


I am trying to solve this task




Find $lambda>0$ such that $f=begin{cases}0& x=0\ |x|^{lambda}cdot sinfrac{1}{x} & xneq 0 end{cases}$



a) is differentiable in zero



b) has a continuous derivative in zero.




My try



a)
$$lim_{h rightarrow 0^+}frac{f(h)-f(0)}{h} = lim_{h rightarrow 0^+}frac{|h|^{lambda}}{h} cdot sinfrac{1}{h} = 0$$



$$lim_{h rightarrow 0^-}frac{f(h)-f(0)}{h} = lim_{h rightarrow 0^+}frac{|h|^{lambda}}{h} cdot sinfrac{1}{h} = 0$$
But there I have some doubts. It seems like $lambda$ does not matter there....


Moreover, can somebody give me hints to b)?
I think that I have do the same thing but this is unbelievable






real-analysis calculus limits derivatives continuity







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am trying to solve this task




Find $lambda>0$ such that $f=begin{cases}0& x=0\ |x|^{lambda}cdot sinfrac{1}{x} & xneq 0 end{cases}$



a) is differentiable in zero



b) has a continuous derivative in zero.




My try



a)
$$lim_{h rightarrow 0^+}frac{f(h)-f(0)}{h} = lim_{h rightarrow 0^+}frac{|h|^{lambda}}{h} cdot sinfrac{1}{h} = 0$$



$$lim_{h rightarrow 0^-}frac{f(h)-f(0)}{h} = lim_{h rightarrow 0^+}frac{|h|^{lambda}}{h} cdot sinfrac{1}{h} = 0$$
But there I have some doubts. It seems like $lambda$ does not matter there....


Moreover, can somebody give me hints to b)?
I think that I have do the same thing but this is unbelievable






real-analysis calculus limits derivatives continuity




real-analysis calculus limits derivatives continuity






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 23 at 1:45









Thomas Shelby

3,7192525




3,7192525










asked Jan 23 at 0:02









VirtualUserVirtualUser

899114




899114












  • $begingroup$
    Do you think the first limit exists if $lambda = 1/2?$
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Jan 23 at 0:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, it cannot exists - Does mean that $lambda - 1 > 0 $ ?
    $endgroup$
    – VirtualUser
    Jan 23 at 0:29










  • $begingroup$
    and in the second case we have the same situation?
    $endgroup$
    – VirtualUser
    Jan 23 at 0:29


















  • $begingroup$
    Do you think the first limit exists if $lambda = 1/2?$
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Jan 23 at 0:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    No, it cannot exists - Does mean that $lambda - 1 > 0 $ ?
    $endgroup$
    – VirtualUser
    Jan 23 at 0:29










  • $begingroup$
    and in the second case we have the same situation?
    $endgroup$
    – VirtualUser
    Jan 23 at 0:29
















$begingroup$
Do you think the first limit exists if $lambda = 1/2?$
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Jan 23 at 0:09




$begingroup$
Do you think the first limit exists if $lambda = 1/2?$
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Jan 23 at 0:09




1




1




$begingroup$
No, it cannot exists - Does mean that $lambda - 1 > 0 $ ?
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Jan 23 at 0:29




$begingroup$
No, it cannot exists - Does mean that $lambda - 1 > 0 $ ?
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Jan 23 at 0:29












$begingroup$
and in the second case we have the same situation?
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Jan 23 at 0:29




$begingroup$
and in the second case we have the same situation?
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Jan 23 at 0:29










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

For the existence part, to make sure the limit $$ f'(0)=lim_{hto 0} frac{|h|^{lambda}}{h}sinfrac{1}{h} $$ exists, we have $ lambda>1 $. And the limit is $ 0 $.



For the continuous derivative part, we have to let the following limit equal to $ 0 $, i.e. :
$$ lim_{hto 0} f'(h)-f'(0)=lim_{hto 0} f'(h)-0=lim_{hto 0} f'(h)=0 .$$
Thus, $$ begin{align} lim_{hto 0+}f'(h)&= lim_{hto 0+}left[(lambda-1)h^{lambda-2}sinfrac{1}{h}-h^{lambda-3}cosfrac{1}{h}right]=0 end{align} $$
and
$$ begin{align} lim_{hto 0-}f'(h)&= -lim_{hto 0-}left[(-lambda+1)(-h)^{lambda-2}sinfrac{1}{h}-(-h)^{lambda-3}cosfrac{1}{h}right]=0 end{align} .$$
Therefore, $ lambda> 3 $.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    $ lambda> 3 $ - are you sure about that part? I think that there should be $ lambda> 2 $
    $endgroup$
    – VirtualUser
    Jan 27 at 22:40










  • $begingroup$
    @VirtualUser Yes, since $ cosfrac{1}{h} $ does not exist.
    $endgroup$
    – user549397
    Jan 28 at 0:35











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3083899%2ffind-lambda-such-that-f-it-is-differentiable-in-zero-and-has-a-continuous-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

For the existence part, to make sure the limit $$ f'(0)=lim_{hto 0} frac{|h|^{lambda}}{h}sinfrac{1}{h} $$ exists, we have $ lambda>1 $. And the limit is $ 0 $.



For the continuous derivative part, we have to let the following limit equal to $ 0 $, i.e. :
$$ lim_{hto 0} f'(h)-f'(0)=lim_{hto 0} f'(h)-0=lim_{hto 0} f'(h)=0 .$$
Thus, $$ begin{align} lim_{hto 0+}f'(h)&= lim_{hto 0+}left[(lambda-1)h^{lambda-2}sinfrac{1}{h}-h^{lambda-3}cosfrac{1}{h}right]=0 end{align} $$
and
$$ begin{align} lim_{hto 0-}f'(h)&= -lim_{hto 0-}left[(-lambda+1)(-h)^{lambda-2}sinfrac{1}{h}-(-h)^{lambda-3}cosfrac{1}{h}right]=0 end{align} .$$
Therefore, $ lambda> 3 $.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    $ lambda> 3 $ - are you sure about that part? I think that there should be $ lambda> 2 $
    $endgroup$
    – VirtualUser
    Jan 27 at 22:40










  • $begingroup$
    @VirtualUser Yes, since $ cosfrac{1}{h} $ does not exist.
    $endgroup$
    – user549397
    Jan 28 at 0:35
















1












$begingroup$

For the existence part, to make sure the limit $$ f'(0)=lim_{hto 0} frac{|h|^{lambda}}{h}sinfrac{1}{h} $$ exists, we have $ lambda>1 $. And the limit is $ 0 $.



For the continuous derivative part, we have to let the following limit equal to $ 0 $, i.e. :
$$ lim_{hto 0} f'(h)-f'(0)=lim_{hto 0} f'(h)-0=lim_{hto 0} f'(h)=0 .$$
Thus, $$ begin{align} lim_{hto 0+}f'(h)&= lim_{hto 0+}left[(lambda-1)h^{lambda-2}sinfrac{1}{h}-h^{lambda-3}cosfrac{1}{h}right]=0 end{align} $$
and
$$ begin{align} lim_{hto 0-}f'(h)&= -lim_{hto 0-}left[(-lambda+1)(-h)^{lambda-2}sinfrac{1}{h}-(-h)^{lambda-3}cosfrac{1}{h}right]=0 end{align} .$$
Therefore, $ lambda> 3 $.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    $ lambda> 3 $ - are you sure about that part? I think that there should be $ lambda> 2 $
    $endgroup$
    – VirtualUser
    Jan 27 at 22:40










  • $begingroup$
    @VirtualUser Yes, since $ cosfrac{1}{h} $ does not exist.
    $endgroup$
    – user549397
    Jan 28 at 0:35














1












1








1





$begingroup$

For the existence part, to make sure the limit $$ f'(0)=lim_{hto 0} frac{|h|^{lambda}}{h}sinfrac{1}{h} $$ exists, we have $ lambda>1 $. And the limit is $ 0 $.



For the continuous derivative part, we have to let the following limit equal to $ 0 $, i.e. :
$$ lim_{hto 0} f'(h)-f'(0)=lim_{hto 0} f'(h)-0=lim_{hto 0} f'(h)=0 .$$
Thus, $$ begin{align} lim_{hto 0+}f'(h)&= lim_{hto 0+}left[(lambda-1)h^{lambda-2}sinfrac{1}{h}-h^{lambda-3}cosfrac{1}{h}right]=0 end{align} $$
and
$$ begin{align} lim_{hto 0-}f'(h)&= -lim_{hto 0-}left[(-lambda+1)(-h)^{lambda-2}sinfrac{1}{h}-(-h)^{lambda-3}cosfrac{1}{h}right]=0 end{align} .$$
Therefore, $ lambda> 3 $.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



For the existence part, to make sure the limit $$ f'(0)=lim_{hto 0} frac{|h|^{lambda}}{h}sinfrac{1}{h} $$ exists, we have $ lambda>1 $. And the limit is $ 0 $.



For the continuous derivative part, we have to let the following limit equal to $ 0 $, i.e. :
$$ lim_{hto 0} f'(h)-f'(0)=lim_{hto 0} f'(h)-0=lim_{hto 0} f'(h)=0 .$$
Thus, $$ begin{align} lim_{hto 0+}f'(h)&= lim_{hto 0+}left[(lambda-1)h^{lambda-2}sinfrac{1}{h}-h^{lambda-3}cosfrac{1}{h}right]=0 end{align} $$
and
$$ begin{align} lim_{hto 0-}f'(h)&= -lim_{hto 0-}left[(-lambda+1)(-h)^{lambda-2}sinfrac{1}{h}-(-h)^{lambda-3}cosfrac{1}{h}right]=0 end{align} .$$
Therefore, $ lambda> 3 $.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 23 at 1:36









user549397user549397

1,5081418




1,5081418












  • $begingroup$
    $ lambda> 3 $ - are you sure about that part? I think that there should be $ lambda> 2 $
    $endgroup$
    – VirtualUser
    Jan 27 at 22:40










  • $begingroup$
    @VirtualUser Yes, since $ cosfrac{1}{h} $ does not exist.
    $endgroup$
    – user549397
    Jan 28 at 0:35


















  • $begingroup$
    $ lambda> 3 $ - are you sure about that part? I think that there should be $ lambda> 2 $
    $endgroup$
    – VirtualUser
    Jan 27 at 22:40










  • $begingroup$
    @VirtualUser Yes, since $ cosfrac{1}{h} $ does not exist.
    $endgroup$
    – user549397
    Jan 28 at 0:35
















$begingroup$
$ lambda> 3 $ - are you sure about that part? I think that there should be $ lambda> 2 $
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Jan 27 at 22:40




$begingroup$
$ lambda> 3 $ - are you sure about that part? I think that there should be $ lambda> 2 $
$endgroup$
– VirtualUser
Jan 27 at 22:40












$begingroup$
@VirtualUser Yes, since $ cosfrac{1}{h} $ does not exist.
$endgroup$
– user549397
Jan 28 at 0:35




$begingroup$
@VirtualUser Yes, since $ cosfrac{1}{h} $ does not exist.
$endgroup$
– user549397
Jan 28 at 0:35


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3083899%2ffind-lambda-such-that-f-it-is-differentiable-in-zero-and-has-a-continuous-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

Image
Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! Mario Kart Wii From The Cutting Room Floor Jump to: navigation, search Mario Kart Wii Developer : Nintendo Publisher : Nintendo Platform : Wii Released in JP : April 10, 2008 Released in US : April 27, 2008 Released in EU : April 11, 2008 Released in AU : April 24, 2008 Released in KR : April 30, 2009 This game has unused animations. This game has unused areas. This game has unused code. This game has unused objects. This game has unused modes / minigames. This game has unused graphics. This game has unused models. This game has unused items. This game has unused music. This game has regional differences. This game has a notes page This game has a prerelease article Mario Kart Wii is the sixth game in the series (not counting Arcade editions), which intro
Read more

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

Image
5 Does "Dominus providebit" mean "The Lord will provide" or "The Lord provides"? I once had a bit of an argument with a guy who studied Latin over that. It's an inscription that appears on the rim of some old Swiss coins that I have. meaning latin-to-english-translation grammar-identification share | improve this question edited Jan 18 at 15:27 V2Blast 105 4 asked Jan 17 at 22:49 Donald K. Donald K. 26 1
Read more

Antonio Litta Visconti Arese

Image
Antonio Litta Visconti Arese I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò In carica 1797 – 1820 Predecessore Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Successore Alfonso Litta Visconti Arese Trattamento Sua grazia Altri titoli Duca Litta Conte del Regno napoleonico d'Italia Patrizio milanese Don Nascita Milano, 2 maggio 1748 Morte Milano, 14 agosto 1820 Dinastia Litta Visconti Arese Padre Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Madre Maria Elisabetta Visconti Borromeo Consorte Barbara Barbiano di Belgioioso Religione cattolicesimo Antonio Litta Visconti Arese , I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò (Milano, 2 maggio 1748 – Milano, 14 agosto 1820), è stato un nobile e politico italiano. Composizione "Il pastore svizzero" di Pietro Morlacchi, con dedica Indice 1 Biografia 2 Onorificenze 3 Araldica 4 Albero genealogico 5 Note 6 Altri progetti Biografia | Antonio Litta Visco
Read more