Suppose X,Y are sets, A,B ⊆ X and C,D ⊆ Y. Compare (A × B) − (C × D) with ((A − C) × B) ∪ (A ×...












0












$begingroup$


I'm a bit puzzled by this question. If A and B are subsets of X and C and D are subsets of Y, is it safe to assume that the elements of A and B are completely different from those of C and D? I feel like that's too simple and not a good assumption to make. If that were the case, then (B − D) would simply be B. This would certainly make the comparison much easier, but I don't have any reason as to why this assumption might be made.



Does anyone have any insight on how to compare these two arbitrary sets?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I'm a bit puzzled by this question. If A and B are subsets of X and C and D are subsets of Y, is it safe to assume that the elements of A and B are completely different from those of C and D? I feel like that's too simple and not a good assumption to make. If that were the case, then (B − D) would simply be B. This would certainly make the comparison much easier, but I don't have any reason as to why this assumption might be made.



    Does anyone have any insight on how to compare these two arbitrary sets?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I'm a bit puzzled by this question. If A and B are subsets of X and C and D are subsets of Y, is it safe to assume that the elements of A and B are completely different from those of C and D? I feel like that's too simple and not a good assumption to make. If that were the case, then (B − D) would simply be B. This would certainly make the comparison much easier, but I don't have any reason as to why this assumption might be made.



      Does anyone have any insight on how to compare these two arbitrary sets?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I'm a bit puzzled by this question. If A and B are subsets of X and C and D are subsets of Y, is it safe to assume that the elements of A and B are completely different from those of C and D? I feel like that's too simple and not a good assumption to make. If that were the case, then (B − D) would simply be B. This would certainly make the comparison much easier, but I don't have any reason as to why this assumption might be made.



      Does anyone have any insight on how to compare these two arbitrary sets?







      elementary-set-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 15 at 16:20









      NickNick

      1




      1






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          If $(x,y)$ is in $((A-C) times B) cup (A times (B-D))$, if in the LHS, then $x in A, x notin C, y in B$ and then $(x,y) in A times B$ and $(x,y) notin C times D$... The same can be said when it is in the RHS (check this..).



          This shows at least one inclusion. The other also holds:



          Now if $(x,y) in (A times B) - (C times D)$, we know $x in A, y in B$ and $xnotin C$ or $y notin D$. What can you say about these two last cases?






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I'm still very confused here. I'm having trouble following your train of thought. Does LHS refer to that which is to the left of the word 'with' or the left side of the union symbol? And I understand the statements you are making about the sets in which x and y reside, but I do not understand how you got to them.
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Jan 16 at 3:17










          • $begingroup$
            @Nick of the union. What exactly cannot you follow?
            $endgroup$
            – Henno Brandsma
            Jan 16 at 16:29










          • $begingroup$
            I just don’t know what the conclusion will be. I am especially confused that you never mentioned the sets X and Y. Do they not matter in the comparison?
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Jan 16 at 18:47










          • $begingroup$
            The only conclusion I can think is maybe RHS of the ‘with’ ends up being (A×B) ∪ (A×B) which is a subset of of the LHS??
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Jan 16 at 18:50










          • $begingroup$
            Because for both sides, x is in A, y is in B, x is NOT in C, and y is NOT in D
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Jan 16 at 18:53











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3074604%2fsuppose-x-y-are-sets-a-b-%25e2%258a%2586-x-and-c-d-%25e2%258a%2586-y-compare-a-%25c3%2597-b-%25e2%2588%2592-c-%25c3%2597-d-with-a-%25e2%2588%2592%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          If $(x,y)$ is in $((A-C) times B) cup (A times (B-D))$, if in the LHS, then $x in A, x notin C, y in B$ and then $(x,y) in A times B$ and $(x,y) notin C times D$... The same can be said when it is in the RHS (check this..).



          This shows at least one inclusion. The other also holds:



          Now if $(x,y) in (A times B) - (C times D)$, we know $x in A, y in B$ and $xnotin C$ or $y notin D$. What can you say about these two last cases?






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I'm still very confused here. I'm having trouble following your train of thought. Does LHS refer to that which is to the left of the word 'with' or the left side of the union symbol? And I understand the statements you are making about the sets in which x and y reside, but I do not understand how you got to them.
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Jan 16 at 3:17










          • $begingroup$
            @Nick of the union. What exactly cannot you follow?
            $endgroup$
            – Henno Brandsma
            Jan 16 at 16:29










          • $begingroup$
            I just don’t know what the conclusion will be. I am especially confused that you never mentioned the sets X and Y. Do they not matter in the comparison?
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Jan 16 at 18:47










          • $begingroup$
            The only conclusion I can think is maybe RHS of the ‘with’ ends up being (A×B) ∪ (A×B) which is a subset of of the LHS??
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Jan 16 at 18:50










          • $begingroup$
            Because for both sides, x is in A, y is in B, x is NOT in C, and y is NOT in D
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Jan 16 at 18:53
















          0












          $begingroup$

          If $(x,y)$ is in $((A-C) times B) cup (A times (B-D))$, if in the LHS, then $x in A, x notin C, y in B$ and then $(x,y) in A times B$ and $(x,y) notin C times D$... The same can be said when it is in the RHS (check this..).



          This shows at least one inclusion. The other also holds:



          Now if $(x,y) in (A times B) - (C times D)$, we know $x in A, y in B$ and $xnotin C$ or $y notin D$. What can you say about these two last cases?






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I'm still very confused here. I'm having trouble following your train of thought. Does LHS refer to that which is to the left of the word 'with' or the left side of the union symbol? And I understand the statements you are making about the sets in which x and y reside, but I do not understand how you got to them.
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Jan 16 at 3:17










          • $begingroup$
            @Nick of the union. What exactly cannot you follow?
            $endgroup$
            – Henno Brandsma
            Jan 16 at 16:29










          • $begingroup$
            I just don’t know what the conclusion will be. I am especially confused that you never mentioned the sets X and Y. Do they not matter in the comparison?
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Jan 16 at 18:47










          • $begingroup$
            The only conclusion I can think is maybe RHS of the ‘with’ ends up being (A×B) ∪ (A×B) which is a subset of of the LHS??
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Jan 16 at 18:50










          • $begingroup$
            Because for both sides, x is in A, y is in B, x is NOT in C, and y is NOT in D
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Jan 16 at 18:53














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          If $(x,y)$ is in $((A-C) times B) cup (A times (B-D))$, if in the LHS, then $x in A, x notin C, y in B$ and then $(x,y) in A times B$ and $(x,y) notin C times D$... The same can be said when it is in the RHS (check this..).



          This shows at least one inclusion. The other also holds:



          Now if $(x,y) in (A times B) - (C times D)$, we know $x in A, y in B$ and $xnotin C$ or $y notin D$. What can you say about these two last cases?






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          If $(x,y)$ is in $((A-C) times B) cup (A times (B-D))$, if in the LHS, then $x in A, x notin C, y in B$ and then $(x,y) in A times B$ and $(x,y) notin C times D$... The same can be said when it is in the RHS (check this..).



          This shows at least one inclusion. The other also holds:



          Now if $(x,y) in (A times B) - (C times D)$, we know $x in A, y in B$ and $xnotin C$ or $y notin D$. What can you say about these two last cases?







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 16 at 16:55

























          answered Jan 15 at 23:39









          Henno BrandsmaHenno Brandsma

          108k347114




          108k347114












          • $begingroup$
            I'm still very confused here. I'm having trouble following your train of thought. Does LHS refer to that which is to the left of the word 'with' or the left side of the union symbol? And I understand the statements you are making about the sets in which x and y reside, but I do not understand how you got to them.
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Jan 16 at 3:17










          • $begingroup$
            @Nick of the union. What exactly cannot you follow?
            $endgroup$
            – Henno Brandsma
            Jan 16 at 16:29










          • $begingroup$
            I just don’t know what the conclusion will be. I am especially confused that you never mentioned the sets X and Y. Do they not matter in the comparison?
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Jan 16 at 18:47










          • $begingroup$
            The only conclusion I can think is maybe RHS of the ‘with’ ends up being (A×B) ∪ (A×B) which is a subset of of the LHS??
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Jan 16 at 18:50










          • $begingroup$
            Because for both sides, x is in A, y is in B, x is NOT in C, and y is NOT in D
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Jan 16 at 18:53


















          • $begingroup$
            I'm still very confused here. I'm having trouble following your train of thought. Does LHS refer to that which is to the left of the word 'with' or the left side of the union symbol? And I understand the statements you are making about the sets in which x and y reside, but I do not understand how you got to them.
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Jan 16 at 3:17










          • $begingroup$
            @Nick of the union. What exactly cannot you follow?
            $endgroup$
            – Henno Brandsma
            Jan 16 at 16:29










          • $begingroup$
            I just don’t know what the conclusion will be. I am especially confused that you never mentioned the sets X and Y. Do they not matter in the comparison?
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Jan 16 at 18:47










          • $begingroup$
            The only conclusion I can think is maybe RHS of the ‘with’ ends up being (A×B) ∪ (A×B) which is a subset of of the LHS??
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Jan 16 at 18:50










          • $begingroup$
            Because for both sides, x is in A, y is in B, x is NOT in C, and y is NOT in D
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Jan 16 at 18:53
















          $begingroup$
          I'm still very confused here. I'm having trouble following your train of thought. Does LHS refer to that which is to the left of the word 'with' or the left side of the union symbol? And I understand the statements you are making about the sets in which x and y reside, but I do not understand how you got to them.
          $endgroup$
          – Nick
          Jan 16 at 3:17




          $begingroup$
          I'm still very confused here. I'm having trouble following your train of thought. Does LHS refer to that which is to the left of the word 'with' or the left side of the union symbol? And I understand the statements you are making about the sets in which x and y reside, but I do not understand how you got to them.
          $endgroup$
          – Nick
          Jan 16 at 3:17












          $begingroup$
          @Nick of the union. What exactly cannot you follow?
          $endgroup$
          – Henno Brandsma
          Jan 16 at 16:29




          $begingroup$
          @Nick of the union. What exactly cannot you follow?
          $endgroup$
          – Henno Brandsma
          Jan 16 at 16:29












          $begingroup$
          I just don’t know what the conclusion will be. I am especially confused that you never mentioned the sets X and Y. Do they not matter in the comparison?
          $endgroup$
          – Nick
          Jan 16 at 18:47




          $begingroup$
          I just don’t know what the conclusion will be. I am especially confused that you never mentioned the sets X and Y. Do they not matter in the comparison?
          $endgroup$
          – Nick
          Jan 16 at 18:47












          $begingroup$
          The only conclusion I can think is maybe RHS of the ‘with’ ends up being (A×B) ∪ (A×B) which is a subset of of the LHS??
          $endgroup$
          – Nick
          Jan 16 at 18:50




          $begingroup$
          The only conclusion I can think is maybe RHS of the ‘with’ ends up being (A×B) ∪ (A×B) which is a subset of of the LHS??
          $endgroup$
          – Nick
          Jan 16 at 18:50












          $begingroup$
          Because for both sides, x is in A, y is in B, x is NOT in C, and y is NOT in D
          $endgroup$
          – Nick
          Jan 16 at 18:53




          $begingroup$
          Because for both sides, x is in A, y is in B, x is NOT in C, and y is NOT in D
          $endgroup$
          – Nick
          Jan 16 at 18:53


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3074604%2fsuppose-x-y-are-sets-a-b-%25e2%258a%2586-x-and-c-d-%25e2%258a%2586-y-compare-a-%25c3%2597-b-%25e2%2588%2592-c-%25c3%2597-d-with-a-%25e2%2588%2592%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Mario Kart Wii

          What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

          Antonio Litta Visconti Arese