If $Ttimes T$ is ergodic, then so is $Ttimes Ttimes T$
$begingroup$
Given a measure preserving system $(X, mathcal{F}, mu, T)$, show that $T times T$ is ergodic with
respect to $mutimes mu$ if and only if $T times T times T$ is ergodic with respect to $mutimes mutimes mu$.
I have already shown that the reverse implication holds. For "$Rightarrow$", maybe it suffices to show that for all $Atimes Btimes Cin mathcal{F}times mathcal{F}times mathcal{F}$ there is a set of full measure, $M$ say, such that all $(a,b,c)in M$ have an $ninmathbb{N}: (T^{3})^n(a,b,c)in Atimes Btimes C$. It surely suffices to show that a.e. all $(a,b,c)$ will enter arbitary sets in $sigma(mathcal{F}^3)$, but I am not sure whether we can do it for only a generating $pi$-system.
Since $Ttimes T$ is ergodic, then there is $n: (T^2)^nin Atimes B$ and there is $m: (T^2)^m in Btimes C$. But then we can't conclude that $T^3(a,b,c)$ eventually enters $Atimes Btimes C$?
Is there anyone who has a further idea? Thanks in advance.
ergodic-theory
$endgroup$
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Given a measure preserving system $(X, mathcal{F}, mu, T)$, show that $T times T$ is ergodic with
respect to $mutimes mu$ if and only if $T times T times T$ is ergodic with respect to $mutimes mutimes mu$.
I have already shown that the reverse implication holds. For "$Rightarrow$", maybe it suffices to show that for all $Atimes Btimes Cin mathcal{F}times mathcal{F}times mathcal{F}$ there is a set of full measure, $M$ say, such that all $(a,b,c)in M$ have an $ninmathbb{N}: (T^{3})^n(a,b,c)in Atimes Btimes C$. It surely suffices to show that a.e. all $(a,b,c)$ will enter arbitary sets in $sigma(mathcal{F}^3)$, but I am not sure whether we can do it for only a generating $pi$-system.
Since $Ttimes T$ is ergodic, then there is $n: (T^2)^nin Atimes B$ and there is $m: (T^2)^m in Btimes C$. But then we can't conclude that $T^3(a,b,c)$ eventually enters $Atimes Btimes C$?
Is there anyone who has a further idea? Thanks in advance.
ergodic-theory
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The argument I know goes like this: $Ttimes T$ ergodic implies that $T$ is weakly mixing (because the operator on $L^2(X)$ has no eigenvalues) which implies that $Ttimes Ttimes T$ is ergodic. (Have you heard about any of these implications?)
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 15 at 15:45
$begingroup$
@Yanko No, but that is because we have never had any exercise about mixing. I'm gonna look at the topic mixing to check if there is such an argument in one of the books we use.
$endgroup$
– Rocco van Vreumingen
Jan 15 at 15:48
$begingroup$
@Yanko The first implication is an exercise in one of the books, which was never homework. I don't know about the second.
$endgroup$
– Rocco van Vreumingen
Jan 15 at 15:58
$begingroup$
There's a theorem that the following are equivalent for a system $(X,T)$. 1. $X$ is weakly mixing. 2. $(Xtimes X,Ttimes T)$ is ergodic 3. For every ergodic system $(Y,S)$ the system $(Ytimes X,Stimes T$ is ergodic.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 15 at 15:59
$begingroup$
From 2 you have 1, and then apply 3 with $Y=Xtimes X$. I don't know any other way to do this.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 15 at 16:00
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Given a measure preserving system $(X, mathcal{F}, mu, T)$, show that $T times T$ is ergodic with
respect to $mutimes mu$ if and only if $T times T times T$ is ergodic with respect to $mutimes mutimes mu$.
I have already shown that the reverse implication holds. For "$Rightarrow$", maybe it suffices to show that for all $Atimes Btimes Cin mathcal{F}times mathcal{F}times mathcal{F}$ there is a set of full measure, $M$ say, such that all $(a,b,c)in M$ have an $ninmathbb{N}: (T^{3})^n(a,b,c)in Atimes Btimes C$. It surely suffices to show that a.e. all $(a,b,c)$ will enter arbitary sets in $sigma(mathcal{F}^3)$, but I am not sure whether we can do it for only a generating $pi$-system.
Since $Ttimes T$ is ergodic, then there is $n: (T^2)^nin Atimes B$ and there is $m: (T^2)^m in Btimes C$. But then we can't conclude that $T^3(a,b,c)$ eventually enters $Atimes Btimes C$?
Is there anyone who has a further idea? Thanks in advance.
ergodic-theory
$endgroup$
Given a measure preserving system $(X, mathcal{F}, mu, T)$, show that $T times T$ is ergodic with
respect to $mutimes mu$ if and only if $T times T times T$ is ergodic with respect to $mutimes mutimes mu$.
I have already shown that the reverse implication holds. For "$Rightarrow$", maybe it suffices to show that for all $Atimes Btimes Cin mathcal{F}times mathcal{F}times mathcal{F}$ there is a set of full measure, $M$ say, such that all $(a,b,c)in M$ have an $ninmathbb{N}: (T^{3})^n(a,b,c)in Atimes Btimes C$. It surely suffices to show that a.e. all $(a,b,c)$ will enter arbitary sets in $sigma(mathcal{F}^3)$, but I am not sure whether we can do it for only a generating $pi$-system.
Since $Ttimes T$ is ergodic, then there is $n: (T^2)^nin Atimes B$ and there is $m: (T^2)^m in Btimes C$. But then we can't conclude that $T^3(a,b,c)$ eventually enters $Atimes Btimes C$?
Is there anyone who has a further idea? Thanks in advance.
ergodic-theory
ergodic-theory
asked Jan 15 at 15:43
Rocco van VreumingenRocco van Vreumingen
928
928
1
$begingroup$
The argument I know goes like this: $Ttimes T$ ergodic implies that $T$ is weakly mixing (because the operator on $L^2(X)$ has no eigenvalues) which implies that $Ttimes Ttimes T$ is ergodic. (Have you heard about any of these implications?)
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 15 at 15:45
$begingroup$
@Yanko No, but that is because we have never had any exercise about mixing. I'm gonna look at the topic mixing to check if there is such an argument in one of the books we use.
$endgroup$
– Rocco van Vreumingen
Jan 15 at 15:48
$begingroup$
@Yanko The first implication is an exercise in one of the books, which was never homework. I don't know about the second.
$endgroup$
– Rocco van Vreumingen
Jan 15 at 15:58
$begingroup$
There's a theorem that the following are equivalent for a system $(X,T)$. 1. $X$ is weakly mixing. 2. $(Xtimes X,Ttimes T)$ is ergodic 3. For every ergodic system $(Y,S)$ the system $(Ytimes X,Stimes T$ is ergodic.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 15 at 15:59
$begingroup$
From 2 you have 1, and then apply 3 with $Y=Xtimes X$. I don't know any other way to do this.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 15 at 16:00
|
show 3 more comments
1
$begingroup$
The argument I know goes like this: $Ttimes T$ ergodic implies that $T$ is weakly mixing (because the operator on $L^2(X)$ has no eigenvalues) which implies that $Ttimes Ttimes T$ is ergodic. (Have you heard about any of these implications?)
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 15 at 15:45
$begingroup$
@Yanko No, but that is because we have never had any exercise about mixing. I'm gonna look at the topic mixing to check if there is such an argument in one of the books we use.
$endgroup$
– Rocco van Vreumingen
Jan 15 at 15:48
$begingroup$
@Yanko The first implication is an exercise in one of the books, which was never homework. I don't know about the second.
$endgroup$
– Rocco van Vreumingen
Jan 15 at 15:58
$begingroup$
There's a theorem that the following are equivalent for a system $(X,T)$. 1. $X$ is weakly mixing. 2. $(Xtimes X,Ttimes T)$ is ergodic 3. For every ergodic system $(Y,S)$ the system $(Ytimes X,Stimes T$ is ergodic.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 15 at 15:59
$begingroup$
From 2 you have 1, and then apply 3 with $Y=Xtimes X$. I don't know any other way to do this.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 15 at 16:00
1
1
$begingroup$
The argument I know goes like this: $Ttimes T$ ergodic implies that $T$ is weakly mixing (because the operator on $L^2(X)$ has no eigenvalues) which implies that $Ttimes Ttimes T$ is ergodic. (Have you heard about any of these implications?)
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 15 at 15:45
$begingroup$
The argument I know goes like this: $Ttimes T$ ergodic implies that $T$ is weakly mixing (because the operator on $L^2(X)$ has no eigenvalues) which implies that $Ttimes Ttimes T$ is ergodic. (Have you heard about any of these implications?)
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 15 at 15:45
$begingroup$
@Yanko No, but that is because we have never had any exercise about mixing. I'm gonna look at the topic mixing to check if there is such an argument in one of the books we use.
$endgroup$
– Rocco van Vreumingen
Jan 15 at 15:48
$begingroup$
@Yanko No, but that is because we have never had any exercise about mixing. I'm gonna look at the topic mixing to check if there is such an argument in one of the books we use.
$endgroup$
– Rocco van Vreumingen
Jan 15 at 15:48
$begingroup$
@Yanko The first implication is an exercise in one of the books, which was never homework. I don't know about the second.
$endgroup$
– Rocco van Vreumingen
Jan 15 at 15:58
$begingroup$
@Yanko The first implication is an exercise in one of the books, which was never homework. I don't know about the second.
$endgroup$
– Rocco van Vreumingen
Jan 15 at 15:58
$begingroup$
There's a theorem that the following are equivalent for a system $(X,T)$. 1. $X$ is weakly mixing. 2. $(Xtimes X,Ttimes T)$ is ergodic 3. For every ergodic system $(Y,S)$ the system $(Ytimes X,Stimes T$ is ergodic.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 15 at 15:59
$begingroup$
There's a theorem that the following are equivalent for a system $(X,T)$. 1. $X$ is weakly mixing. 2. $(Xtimes X,Ttimes T)$ is ergodic 3. For every ergodic system $(Y,S)$ the system $(Ytimes X,Stimes T$ is ergodic.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 15 at 15:59
$begingroup$
From 2 you have 1, and then apply 3 with $Y=Xtimes X$. I don't know any other way to do this.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 15 at 16:00
$begingroup$
From 2 you have 1, and then apply 3 with $Y=Xtimes X$. I don't know any other way to do this.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 15 at 16:00
|
show 3 more comments
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3074565%2fif-t-times-t-is-ergodic-then-so-is-t-times-t-times-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3074565%2fif-t-times-t-is-ergodic-then-so-is-t-times-t-times-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
The argument I know goes like this: $Ttimes T$ ergodic implies that $T$ is weakly mixing (because the operator on $L^2(X)$ has no eigenvalues) which implies that $Ttimes Ttimes T$ is ergodic. (Have you heard about any of these implications?)
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 15 at 15:45
$begingroup$
@Yanko No, but that is because we have never had any exercise about mixing. I'm gonna look at the topic mixing to check if there is such an argument in one of the books we use.
$endgroup$
– Rocco van Vreumingen
Jan 15 at 15:48
$begingroup$
@Yanko The first implication is an exercise in one of the books, which was never homework. I don't know about the second.
$endgroup$
– Rocco van Vreumingen
Jan 15 at 15:58
$begingroup$
There's a theorem that the following are equivalent for a system $(X,T)$. 1. $X$ is weakly mixing. 2. $(Xtimes X,Ttimes T)$ is ergodic 3. For every ergodic system $(Y,S)$ the system $(Ytimes X,Stimes T$ is ergodic.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 15 at 15:59
$begingroup$
From 2 you have 1, and then apply 3 with $Y=Xtimes X$. I don't know any other way to do this.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 15 at 16:00