Difficult Derivative?












4












$begingroup$


I'm in a single-variable calculus course, in which we recently covered logarithmic differentiation. The professor proved it that works when $f(x)>0$, and when $f(x)<0$. I've been trying to find a way to derive that kind of function when $f(x)=0$, but I'm not sure if it's possible, or what. I've thought of this example, that resists all my efforts to differentiate, but seems to be differentiable, (and even appears to have a value of zero).



Find




$$f'left(frac{3pi}{2}right)quad rm where quad f(x)=(sin{x} + 1)^x .$$




Is there any way I can find this derivative (if it exists), beyond numerically computing the limit from the definition of the derivative? Or, vice versa, how can I prove that this derivative doesn't exist?



Thanks,
Reggie










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What definition of exponentiation are you using?
    $endgroup$
    – user7530
    Oct 28 '13 at 19:01
















4












$begingroup$


I'm in a single-variable calculus course, in which we recently covered logarithmic differentiation. The professor proved it that works when $f(x)>0$, and when $f(x)<0$. I've been trying to find a way to derive that kind of function when $f(x)=0$, but I'm not sure if it's possible, or what. I've thought of this example, that resists all my efforts to differentiate, but seems to be differentiable, (and even appears to have a value of zero).



Find




$$f'left(frac{3pi}{2}right)quad rm where quad f(x)=(sin{x} + 1)^x .$$




Is there any way I can find this derivative (if it exists), beyond numerically computing the limit from the definition of the derivative? Or, vice versa, how can I prove that this derivative doesn't exist?



Thanks,
Reggie










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What definition of exponentiation are you using?
    $endgroup$
    – user7530
    Oct 28 '13 at 19:01














4












4








4





$begingroup$


I'm in a single-variable calculus course, in which we recently covered logarithmic differentiation. The professor proved it that works when $f(x)>0$, and when $f(x)<0$. I've been trying to find a way to derive that kind of function when $f(x)=0$, but I'm not sure if it's possible, or what. I've thought of this example, that resists all my efforts to differentiate, but seems to be differentiable, (and even appears to have a value of zero).



Find




$$f'left(frac{3pi}{2}right)quad rm where quad f(x)=(sin{x} + 1)^x .$$




Is there any way I can find this derivative (if it exists), beyond numerically computing the limit from the definition of the derivative? Or, vice versa, how can I prove that this derivative doesn't exist?



Thanks,
Reggie










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm in a single-variable calculus course, in which we recently covered logarithmic differentiation. The professor proved it that works when $f(x)>0$, and when $f(x)<0$. I've been trying to find a way to derive that kind of function when $f(x)=0$, but I'm not sure if it's possible, or what. I've thought of this example, that resists all my efforts to differentiate, but seems to be differentiable, (and even appears to have a value of zero).



Find




$$f'left(frac{3pi}{2}right)quad rm where quad f(x)=(sin{x} + 1)^x .$$




Is there any way I can find this derivative (if it exists), beyond numerically computing the limit from the definition of the derivative? Or, vice versa, how can I prove that this derivative doesn't exist?



Thanks,
Reggie







calculus derivatives






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Oct 28 '13 at 19:06









Mhenni Benghorbal

43.1k63574




43.1k63574










asked Oct 28 '13 at 18:58









ReggieReggie

2112




2112












  • $begingroup$
    What definition of exponentiation are you using?
    $endgroup$
    – user7530
    Oct 28 '13 at 19:01


















  • $begingroup$
    What definition of exponentiation are you using?
    $endgroup$
    – user7530
    Oct 28 '13 at 19:01
















$begingroup$
What definition of exponentiation are you using?
$endgroup$
– user7530
Oct 28 '13 at 19:01




$begingroup$
What definition of exponentiation are you using?
$endgroup$
– user7530
Oct 28 '13 at 19:01










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

Oddly enough, this is a case where you actually do well to revert to the definition of the derivative:



$$f'left({3piover2}right)=lim_{hrightarrow0}{fleft({3piover2}+hright)-fleft({3piover2}right)over h}$$



You don't have to do any numerical computation. Note that $sin({3piover2}+h)=-cos h$, so for $f(x)=(1+sin x)^x$ the definition becomes



$$f'left({3piover2}right)=lim_{hrightarrow0}{(1-cos h)^{{3piover2}+h}over h}$$



since $f({3piover2})$ is clearly $0$. But for (small) nonzero $h$, we have $$0lt|1-cos h|^{{3piover2}+h}lt|1-cos h|$$since $|1-cos h|lt1$ and $3pi/2gt1$, from which, using the definition of the derivative for the cosine function and the fact that $(cos x)'=-sin x$, it follows that



$$0le lim_{hrightarrow0}left|{(1-cos h)^{{3piover2}+h}over h}right|leleft|lim_{hrightarrow0}{1-cos hover h}right|=|sin0|=0$$



hence



$$ f'left({3piover2}right)=0$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    $$log{f(x)} = x log{(sin{x}+1)}$$



    $$frac{d}{dx} log{f(x)} = log{(sin{x}+1)} + frac{x cos{x}}{sin{x}+1} = frac{(sin{x}+1)log{(sin{x}+1)}+x cos{x}}{sin{x}+1} $$



    Now,



    $$frac{d}{dx} log{f(x)} = frac{f'(x)}{f(x)}$$



    so that



    $$f'(x) = (sin{x}+1)^{x} log{(sin{x}+1)}+ (sin{x}+1)^{x-1} x cos{x} $$



    Note that this has been mere manipulation without any regard to where $f'$ may exist, etc. However, as you are interested in the value at $x=3 pi/2$, $x gt 0$, so that the factor $(sin{x}+1)^{x}$ goes to zero faster than $log{(sin{x}+1)}$ blows up. Therefore, $f'(3 pi/2)=0$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Yes, that is what I suspect to be true. The only problem I have with this answer, is that I don't know how I can be sure that the limit of the derivative comes out with the correct value, or I want to know how we know that the derivative is continuous. Basically, this leads me to the question, Given a function f(x), can we know anything about the continuity of f'(x) without actually differentiating f(x)?
      $endgroup$
      – Reggie
      Oct 28 '13 at 21:01












    • $begingroup$
      @Reggie: not entirely sure of what you mean. Just know that $$lim_{yto 0} y^{alpha} log{y} = 0$$ when $alpha gt 0$. As $x to 3 pi/2$, $1+sin{x} sim frac12 (x-3 pi/2)^2$. (Hint: Expand $sin{[(x-3 pi/2) + 3 pi/2]}$ for $epsilon=x-3 pi/2$ being a small quantity.) As far as your question goes, I know an answer involving Fourier transforms, but I doubt that's what you want.
      $endgroup$
      – Ron Gordon
      Oct 28 '13 at 21:20










    • $begingroup$
      I would like anything that answers the question regarding the continuity of the derivative of a function. I have been thinking about this for a while, (and I do understand more math then would be expected of a student in a first-year calculus class). Also, I don't mind if I have to look up, or learn a couple new concepts to understand the answer. So feel free to post the answer involving Fourier transforms... I do know what a Fourier transform is, and have resources to learn more, so it might help.
      $endgroup$
      – Reggie
      Oct 28 '13 at 21:29










    • $begingroup$
      A heuristic statement - by no means rigorous, although it can be made so - is that a function $f(x)$ of class $C^n$ has a Fourier transform $hat{f}(k)$ that has a leading asymptotic behavior proportional to $1/k^{n+1}$. That is, if $f$ has a discontinuity in the derivative, then its Fourier transform $hat{f}$ has a leading asymptotic behavior of $1/k^2$ as $ktoinfty$. (Think of $f(x)=pi e^{-|x|}$, whose transform is $hat{f}(k) = 1/(1+k^2)$.)
      $endgroup$
      – Ron Gordon
      Oct 28 '13 at 21:38



















    0












    $begingroup$

    $f(x) = (sin(x)+1)^x = (e^{ln(sin(x)+1)})^x = e^{x ln(sin(x)+1)}$.



    Then $f'(x) = e^{x ln(sin(x)+1)} * frac{d}{dx} [x ln(sin(x)+1)]$



    by the rules for differentiating exponentials, and the chain rule.



    Now $frac{d}{dx} [x ln(sin(x)+1)] = ln(sin(x)+1) + x * frac{1}{sin(x)+1} * cos(x)$



    by a combination of the product rule and chain rule.



    Now simply insert the value of $frac{3pi}{2}$ and see what happens (I don't have time to do this at the moment).






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      0












      $begingroup$

      Graph of $f(x)$:





      Graph of $f'(x)$:





      See both the above graphs.
      $f(x)$ is actually not differentiable at $x= 1.5π$. The graph of $f'(x)$ at $x = 1.5π$ is a vertical asymptote. The function's second differential may say that it is increasing/decreasing at $x= 1.5π$ but the first derivative doesn't exist.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Link for f '(x) : drive.google.com/file/d/1PYH7H1fAc41qC6g6G4PQOQeXYRY72hK9/…
        $endgroup$
        – Madhav
        Jan 10 '18 at 2:55












      • $begingroup$
        It would be much more useful if you were to upload the images somewhere such that they can be embedded into your post. As it is right now, your answer is quite hard to follow.
        $endgroup$
        – Xander Henderson
        Jan 10 '18 at 4:22



















      0












      $begingroup$

      Not completely sure what you're looking for here, but a simple way of solving this is the chain rule.



      $f(x)=(sin{x} +1)^x$



      First you have to realize that you're dealing with a chain in the form of $a^x$. Since the derivative of $a^x$ is $ln(a)cdot a^x$.



      Set $sin(x)+1$ equal to $u$
      Then your function looks like this



      $f(x)=u^x$



      In the chain rule, you take the derivative and write ignore the $u$ and then multiply it by the derivative of the $u$.



      We will take the derivative of $u^x$ then multiply it by the derivative of $u$
      Shown here



      $f'(x)=ln(u)cdot(u^x)cdot frac{du}{dx}$



      Plug in the blop for u



      $f'(x)= ln(sin{x} +1)cdot(sin{x} +1)^x cdotfrac{d}{dx} (sin{x} +1)$



      Then take the derivative of the $sin{x} + 1$ which is $cos{x}$ because the derivative of a constant is 0



      $f(x)= ln(sin{x} +1)cdot(sin{x} +1)^x cdot cos{x}$



      Then plug in $frac{3pi}{2}$



      $f'(3π/2)= ln(sinfrac{3pi}{2} +1)cdot(sin{frac{3pi}{2}})^{(frac{3pi}{2})} cdot cosfrac{3pi}{2}$



      Since $cosfrac{3pi}{2} = 0$ then $f'(frac{3pi}{2}) = 0$ because anything multiplied by 0 becomes 0.
      You didn't have to use the rules of logarithms to accomplish this, unless your teacher specifically asks you to...






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$









      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Note that you can format your post using $LaTeX$ syntax. E.g. $LaTeX$.
        $endgroup$
        – jgon
        Nov 7 '15 at 19:48



















      -3












      $begingroup$

      You can find the first derivative algebraically using the product and chain rules.



      I rewrote the function as $y=e$ to the power of $ln sin x +1$. Then I rewrote this as e to the power of u. I used the chain rule to find $frac{dy}{du}$, which was the original function (as the derivative of e to the x is just e to the x). The derivite of the inner function $ln sin x+1$ required use of the product and chain rules. We can find the derivitive of the overall function to be $ln sin x+1$ times $cos x csc x +2 cos x$. Then we can substitute in for $x$. Notice how $e$ to the power of $ln 0$ is just $0$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        First off, it is perhaps worth mentioning that you are also using implicit differentiation here (not just the product and chain rules). Second, your answer is quite difficult to follow---it would be vastly improved with a little MathJax formatting. Finally, this question already has several answers---what does your answer add that hasn't been said already?
        $endgroup$
        – Xander Henderson
        Jun 20 '18 at 0:19











      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f543174%2fdifficult-derivative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      6 Answers
      6






      active

      oldest

      votes








      6 Answers
      6






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      7












      $begingroup$

      Oddly enough, this is a case where you actually do well to revert to the definition of the derivative:



      $$f'left({3piover2}right)=lim_{hrightarrow0}{fleft({3piover2}+hright)-fleft({3piover2}right)over h}$$



      You don't have to do any numerical computation. Note that $sin({3piover2}+h)=-cos h$, so for $f(x)=(1+sin x)^x$ the definition becomes



      $$f'left({3piover2}right)=lim_{hrightarrow0}{(1-cos h)^{{3piover2}+h}over h}$$



      since $f({3piover2})$ is clearly $0$. But for (small) nonzero $h$, we have $$0lt|1-cos h|^{{3piover2}+h}lt|1-cos h|$$since $|1-cos h|lt1$ and $3pi/2gt1$, from which, using the definition of the derivative for the cosine function and the fact that $(cos x)'=-sin x$, it follows that



      $$0le lim_{hrightarrow0}left|{(1-cos h)^{{3piover2}+h}over h}right|leleft|lim_{hrightarrow0}{1-cos hover h}right|=|sin0|=0$$



      hence



      $$ f'left({3piover2}right)=0$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        7












        $begingroup$

        Oddly enough, this is a case where you actually do well to revert to the definition of the derivative:



        $$f'left({3piover2}right)=lim_{hrightarrow0}{fleft({3piover2}+hright)-fleft({3piover2}right)over h}$$



        You don't have to do any numerical computation. Note that $sin({3piover2}+h)=-cos h$, so for $f(x)=(1+sin x)^x$ the definition becomes



        $$f'left({3piover2}right)=lim_{hrightarrow0}{(1-cos h)^{{3piover2}+h}over h}$$



        since $f({3piover2})$ is clearly $0$. But for (small) nonzero $h$, we have $$0lt|1-cos h|^{{3piover2}+h}lt|1-cos h|$$since $|1-cos h|lt1$ and $3pi/2gt1$, from which, using the definition of the derivative for the cosine function and the fact that $(cos x)'=-sin x$, it follows that



        $$0le lim_{hrightarrow0}left|{(1-cos h)^{{3piover2}+h}over h}right|leleft|lim_{hrightarrow0}{1-cos hover h}right|=|sin0|=0$$



        hence



        $$ f'left({3piover2}right)=0$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          7












          7








          7





          $begingroup$

          Oddly enough, this is a case where you actually do well to revert to the definition of the derivative:



          $$f'left({3piover2}right)=lim_{hrightarrow0}{fleft({3piover2}+hright)-fleft({3piover2}right)over h}$$



          You don't have to do any numerical computation. Note that $sin({3piover2}+h)=-cos h$, so for $f(x)=(1+sin x)^x$ the definition becomes



          $$f'left({3piover2}right)=lim_{hrightarrow0}{(1-cos h)^{{3piover2}+h}over h}$$



          since $f({3piover2})$ is clearly $0$. But for (small) nonzero $h$, we have $$0lt|1-cos h|^{{3piover2}+h}lt|1-cos h|$$since $|1-cos h|lt1$ and $3pi/2gt1$, from which, using the definition of the derivative for the cosine function and the fact that $(cos x)'=-sin x$, it follows that



          $$0le lim_{hrightarrow0}left|{(1-cos h)^{{3piover2}+h}over h}right|leleft|lim_{hrightarrow0}{1-cos hover h}right|=|sin0|=0$$



          hence



          $$ f'left({3piover2}right)=0$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Oddly enough, this is a case where you actually do well to revert to the definition of the derivative:



          $$f'left({3piover2}right)=lim_{hrightarrow0}{fleft({3piover2}+hright)-fleft({3piover2}right)over h}$$



          You don't have to do any numerical computation. Note that $sin({3piover2}+h)=-cos h$, so for $f(x)=(1+sin x)^x$ the definition becomes



          $$f'left({3piover2}right)=lim_{hrightarrow0}{(1-cos h)^{{3piover2}+h}over h}$$



          since $f({3piover2})$ is clearly $0$. But for (small) nonzero $h$, we have $$0lt|1-cos h|^{{3piover2}+h}lt|1-cos h|$$since $|1-cos h|lt1$ and $3pi/2gt1$, from which, using the definition of the derivative for the cosine function and the fact that $(cos x)'=-sin x$, it follows that



          $$0le lim_{hrightarrow0}left|{(1-cos h)^{{3piover2}+h}over h}right|leleft|lim_{hrightarrow0}{1-cos hover h}right|=|sin0|=0$$



          hence



          $$ f'left({3piover2}right)=0$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Oct 28 '13 at 22:23









          Barry CipraBarry Cipra

          59.5k653126




          59.5k653126























              2












              $begingroup$

              $$log{f(x)} = x log{(sin{x}+1)}$$



              $$frac{d}{dx} log{f(x)} = log{(sin{x}+1)} + frac{x cos{x}}{sin{x}+1} = frac{(sin{x}+1)log{(sin{x}+1)}+x cos{x}}{sin{x}+1} $$



              Now,



              $$frac{d}{dx} log{f(x)} = frac{f'(x)}{f(x)}$$



              so that



              $$f'(x) = (sin{x}+1)^{x} log{(sin{x}+1)}+ (sin{x}+1)^{x-1} x cos{x} $$



              Note that this has been mere manipulation without any regard to where $f'$ may exist, etc. However, as you are interested in the value at $x=3 pi/2$, $x gt 0$, so that the factor $(sin{x}+1)^{x}$ goes to zero faster than $log{(sin{x}+1)}$ blows up. Therefore, $f'(3 pi/2)=0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                Yes, that is what I suspect to be true. The only problem I have with this answer, is that I don't know how I can be sure that the limit of the derivative comes out with the correct value, or I want to know how we know that the derivative is continuous. Basically, this leads me to the question, Given a function f(x), can we know anything about the continuity of f'(x) without actually differentiating f(x)?
                $endgroup$
                – Reggie
                Oct 28 '13 at 21:01












              • $begingroup$
                @Reggie: not entirely sure of what you mean. Just know that $$lim_{yto 0} y^{alpha} log{y} = 0$$ when $alpha gt 0$. As $x to 3 pi/2$, $1+sin{x} sim frac12 (x-3 pi/2)^2$. (Hint: Expand $sin{[(x-3 pi/2) + 3 pi/2]}$ for $epsilon=x-3 pi/2$ being a small quantity.) As far as your question goes, I know an answer involving Fourier transforms, but I doubt that's what you want.
                $endgroup$
                – Ron Gordon
                Oct 28 '13 at 21:20










              • $begingroup$
                I would like anything that answers the question regarding the continuity of the derivative of a function. I have been thinking about this for a while, (and I do understand more math then would be expected of a student in a first-year calculus class). Also, I don't mind if I have to look up, or learn a couple new concepts to understand the answer. So feel free to post the answer involving Fourier transforms... I do know what a Fourier transform is, and have resources to learn more, so it might help.
                $endgroup$
                – Reggie
                Oct 28 '13 at 21:29










              • $begingroup$
                A heuristic statement - by no means rigorous, although it can be made so - is that a function $f(x)$ of class $C^n$ has a Fourier transform $hat{f}(k)$ that has a leading asymptotic behavior proportional to $1/k^{n+1}$. That is, if $f$ has a discontinuity in the derivative, then its Fourier transform $hat{f}$ has a leading asymptotic behavior of $1/k^2$ as $ktoinfty$. (Think of $f(x)=pi e^{-|x|}$, whose transform is $hat{f}(k) = 1/(1+k^2)$.)
                $endgroup$
                – Ron Gordon
                Oct 28 '13 at 21:38
















              2












              $begingroup$

              $$log{f(x)} = x log{(sin{x}+1)}$$



              $$frac{d}{dx} log{f(x)} = log{(sin{x}+1)} + frac{x cos{x}}{sin{x}+1} = frac{(sin{x}+1)log{(sin{x}+1)}+x cos{x}}{sin{x}+1} $$



              Now,



              $$frac{d}{dx} log{f(x)} = frac{f'(x)}{f(x)}$$



              so that



              $$f'(x) = (sin{x}+1)^{x} log{(sin{x}+1)}+ (sin{x}+1)^{x-1} x cos{x} $$



              Note that this has been mere manipulation without any regard to where $f'$ may exist, etc. However, as you are interested in the value at $x=3 pi/2$, $x gt 0$, so that the factor $(sin{x}+1)^{x}$ goes to zero faster than $log{(sin{x}+1)}$ blows up. Therefore, $f'(3 pi/2)=0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                Yes, that is what I suspect to be true. The only problem I have with this answer, is that I don't know how I can be sure that the limit of the derivative comes out with the correct value, or I want to know how we know that the derivative is continuous. Basically, this leads me to the question, Given a function f(x), can we know anything about the continuity of f'(x) without actually differentiating f(x)?
                $endgroup$
                – Reggie
                Oct 28 '13 at 21:01












              • $begingroup$
                @Reggie: not entirely sure of what you mean. Just know that $$lim_{yto 0} y^{alpha} log{y} = 0$$ when $alpha gt 0$. As $x to 3 pi/2$, $1+sin{x} sim frac12 (x-3 pi/2)^2$. (Hint: Expand $sin{[(x-3 pi/2) + 3 pi/2]}$ for $epsilon=x-3 pi/2$ being a small quantity.) As far as your question goes, I know an answer involving Fourier transforms, but I doubt that's what you want.
                $endgroup$
                – Ron Gordon
                Oct 28 '13 at 21:20










              • $begingroup$
                I would like anything that answers the question regarding the continuity of the derivative of a function. I have been thinking about this for a while, (and I do understand more math then would be expected of a student in a first-year calculus class). Also, I don't mind if I have to look up, or learn a couple new concepts to understand the answer. So feel free to post the answer involving Fourier transforms... I do know what a Fourier transform is, and have resources to learn more, so it might help.
                $endgroup$
                – Reggie
                Oct 28 '13 at 21:29










              • $begingroup$
                A heuristic statement - by no means rigorous, although it can be made so - is that a function $f(x)$ of class $C^n$ has a Fourier transform $hat{f}(k)$ that has a leading asymptotic behavior proportional to $1/k^{n+1}$. That is, if $f$ has a discontinuity in the derivative, then its Fourier transform $hat{f}$ has a leading asymptotic behavior of $1/k^2$ as $ktoinfty$. (Think of $f(x)=pi e^{-|x|}$, whose transform is $hat{f}(k) = 1/(1+k^2)$.)
                $endgroup$
                – Ron Gordon
                Oct 28 '13 at 21:38














              2












              2








              2





              $begingroup$

              $$log{f(x)} = x log{(sin{x}+1)}$$



              $$frac{d}{dx} log{f(x)} = log{(sin{x}+1)} + frac{x cos{x}}{sin{x}+1} = frac{(sin{x}+1)log{(sin{x}+1)}+x cos{x}}{sin{x}+1} $$



              Now,



              $$frac{d}{dx} log{f(x)} = frac{f'(x)}{f(x)}$$



              so that



              $$f'(x) = (sin{x}+1)^{x} log{(sin{x}+1)}+ (sin{x}+1)^{x-1} x cos{x} $$



              Note that this has been mere manipulation without any regard to where $f'$ may exist, etc. However, as you are interested in the value at $x=3 pi/2$, $x gt 0$, so that the factor $(sin{x}+1)^{x}$ goes to zero faster than $log{(sin{x}+1)}$ blows up. Therefore, $f'(3 pi/2)=0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              $$log{f(x)} = x log{(sin{x}+1)}$$



              $$frac{d}{dx} log{f(x)} = log{(sin{x}+1)} + frac{x cos{x}}{sin{x}+1} = frac{(sin{x}+1)log{(sin{x}+1)}+x cos{x}}{sin{x}+1} $$



              Now,



              $$frac{d}{dx} log{f(x)} = frac{f'(x)}{f(x)}$$



              so that



              $$f'(x) = (sin{x}+1)^{x} log{(sin{x}+1)}+ (sin{x}+1)^{x-1} x cos{x} $$



              Note that this has been mere manipulation without any regard to where $f'$ may exist, etc. However, as you are interested in the value at $x=3 pi/2$, $x gt 0$, so that the factor $(sin{x}+1)^{x}$ goes to zero faster than $log{(sin{x}+1)}$ blows up. Therefore, $f'(3 pi/2)=0$.







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Oct 28 '13 at 19:13









              Ron GordonRon Gordon

              122k14154264




              122k14154264












              • $begingroup$
                Yes, that is what I suspect to be true. The only problem I have with this answer, is that I don't know how I can be sure that the limit of the derivative comes out with the correct value, or I want to know how we know that the derivative is continuous. Basically, this leads me to the question, Given a function f(x), can we know anything about the continuity of f'(x) without actually differentiating f(x)?
                $endgroup$
                – Reggie
                Oct 28 '13 at 21:01












              • $begingroup$
                @Reggie: not entirely sure of what you mean. Just know that $$lim_{yto 0} y^{alpha} log{y} = 0$$ when $alpha gt 0$. As $x to 3 pi/2$, $1+sin{x} sim frac12 (x-3 pi/2)^2$. (Hint: Expand $sin{[(x-3 pi/2) + 3 pi/2]}$ for $epsilon=x-3 pi/2$ being a small quantity.) As far as your question goes, I know an answer involving Fourier transforms, but I doubt that's what you want.
                $endgroup$
                – Ron Gordon
                Oct 28 '13 at 21:20










              • $begingroup$
                I would like anything that answers the question regarding the continuity of the derivative of a function. I have been thinking about this for a while, (and I do understand more math then would be expected of a student in a first-year calculus class). Also, I don't mind if I have to look up, or learn a couple new concepts to understand the answer. So feel free to post the answer involving Fourier transforms... I do know what a Fourier transform is, and have resources to learn more, so it might help.
                $endgroup$
                – Reggie
                Oct 28 '13 at 21:29










              • $begingroup$
                A heuristic statement - by no means rigorous, although it can be made so - is that a function $f(x)$ of class $C^n$ has a Fourier transform $hat{f}(k)$ that has a leading asymptotic behavior proportional to $1/k^{n+1}$. That is, if $f$ has a discontinuity in the derivative, then its Fourier transform $hat{f}$ has a leading asymptotic behavior of $1/k^2$ as $ktoinfty$. (Think of $f(x)=pi e^{-|x|}$, whose transform is $hat{f}(k) = 1/(1+k^2)$.)
                $endgroup$
                – Ron Gordon
                Oct 28 '13 at 21:38


















              • $begingroup$
                Yes, that is what I suspect to be true. The only problem I have with this answer, is that I don't know how I can be sure that the limit of the derivative comes out with the correct value, or I want to know how we know that the derivative is continuous. Basically, this leads me to the question, Given a function f(x), can we know anything about the continuity of f'(x) without actually differentiating f(x)?
                $endgroup$
                – Reggie
                Oct 28 '13 at 21:01












              • $begingroup$
                @Reggie: not entirely sure of what you mean. Just know that $$lim_{yto 0} y^{alpha} log{y} = 0$$ when $alpha gt 0$. As $x to 3 pi/2$, $1+sin{x} sim frac12 (x-3 pi/2)^2$. (Hint: Expand $sin{[(x-3 pi/2) + 3 pi/2]}$ for $epsilon=x-3 pi/2$ being a small quantity.) As far as your question goes, I know an answer involving Fourier transforms, but I doubt that's what you want.
                $endgroup$
                – Ron Gordon
                Oct 28 '13 at 21:20










              • $begingroup$
                I would like anything that answers the question regarding the continuity of the derivative of a function. I have been thinking about this for a while, (and I do understand more math then would be expected of a student in a first-year calculus class). Also, I don't mind if I have to look up, or learn a couple new concepts to understand the answer. So feel free to post the answer involving Fourier transforms... I do know what a Fourier transform is, and have resources to learn more, so it might help.
                $endgroup$
                – Reggie
                Oct 28 '13 at 21:29










              • $begingroup$
                A heuristic statement - by no means rigorous, although it can be made so - is that a function $f(x)$ of class $C^n$ has a Fourier transform $hat{f}(k)$ that has a leading asymptotic behavior proportional to $1/k^{n+1}$. That is, if $f$ has a discontinuity in the derivative, then its Fourier transform $hat{f}$ has a leading asymptotic behavior of $1/k^2$ as $ktoinfty$. (Think of $f(x)=pi e^{-|x|}$, whose transform is $hat{f}(k) = 1/(1+k^2)$.)
                $endgroup$
                – Ron Gordon
                Oct 28 '13 at 21:38
















              $begingroup$
              Yes, that is what I suspect to be true. The only problem I have with this answer, is that I don't know how I can be sure that the limit of the derivative comes out with the correct value, or I want to know how we know that the derivative is continuous. Basically, this leads me to the question, Given a function f(x), can we know anything about the continuity of f'(x) without actually differentiating f(x)?
              $endgroup$
              – Reggie
              Oct 28 '13 at 21:01






              $begingroup$
              Yes, that is what I suspect to be true. The only problem I have with this answer, is that I don't know how I can be sure that the limit of the derivative comes out with the correct value, or I want to know how we know that the derivative is continuous. Basically, this leads me to the question, Given a function f(x), can we know anything about the continuity of f'(x) without actually differentiating f(x)?
              $endgroup$
              – Reggie
              Oct 28 '13 at 21:01














              $begingroup$
              @Reggie: not entirely sure of what you mean. Just know that $$lim_{yto 0} y^{alpha} log{y} = 0$$ when $alpha gt 0$. As $x to 3 pi/2$, $1+sin{x} sim frac12 (x-3 pi/2)^2$. (Hint: Expand $sin{[(x-3 pi/2) + 3 pi/2]}$ for $epsilon=x-3 pi/2$ being a small quantity.) As far as your question goes, I know an answer involving Fourier transforms, but I doubt that's what you want.
              $endgroup$
              – Ron Gordon
              Oct 28 '13 at 21:20




              $begingroup$
              @Reggie: not entirely sure of what you mean. Just know that $$lim_{yto 0} y^{alpha} log{y} = 0$$ when $alpha gt 0$. As $x to 3 pi/2$, $1+sin{x} sim frac12 (x-3 pi/2)^2$. (Hint: Expand $sin{[(x-3 pi/2) + 3 pi/2]}$ for $epsilon=x-3 pi/2$ being a small quantity.) As far as your question goes, I know an answer involving Fourier transforms, but I doubt that's what you want.
              $endgroup$
              – Ron Gordon
              Oct 28 '13 at 21:20












              $begingroup$
              I would like anything that answers the question regarding the continuity of the derivative of a function. I have been thinking about this for a while, (and I do understand more math then would be expected of a student in a first-year calculus class). Also, I don't mind if I have to look up, or learn a couple new concepts to understand the answer. So feel free to post the answer involving Fourier transforms... I do know what a Fourier transform is, and have resources to learn more, so it might help.
              $endgroup$
              – Reggie
              Oct 28 '13 at 21:29




              $begingroup$
              I would like anything that answers the question regarding the continuity of the derivative of a function. I have been thinking about this for a while, (and I do understand more math then would be expected of a student in a first-year calculus class). Also, I don't mind if I have to look up, or learn a couple new concepts to understand the answer. So feel free to post the answer involving Fourier transforms... I do know what a Fourier transform is, and have resources to learn more, so it might help.
              $endgroup$
              – Reggie
              Oct 28 '13 at 21:29












              $begingroup$
              A heuristic statement - by no means rigorous, although it can be made so - is that a function $f(x)$ of class $C^n$ has a Fourier transform $hat{f}(k)$ that has a leading asymptotic behavior proportional to $1/k^{n+1}$. That is, if $f$ has a discontinuity in the derivative, then its Fourier transform $hat{f}$ has a leading asymptotic behavior of $1/k^2$ as $ktoinfty$. (Think of $f(x)=pi e^{-|x|}$, whose transform is $hat{f}(k) = 1/(1+k^2)$.)
              $endgroup$
              – Ron Gordon
              Oct 28 '13 at 21:38




              $begingroup$
              A heuristic statement - by no means rigorous, although it can be made so - is that a function $f(x)$ of class $C^n$ has a Fourier transform $hat{f}(k)$ that has a leading asymptotic behavior proportional to $1/k^{n+1}$. That is, if $f$ has a discontinuity in the derivative, then its Fourier transform $hat{f}$ has a leading asymptotic behavior of $1/k^2$ as $ktoinfty$. (Think of $f(x)=pi e^{-|x|}$, whose transform is $hat{f}(k) = 1/(1+k^2)$.)
              $endgroup$
              – Ron Gordon
              Oct 28 '13 at 21:38











              0












              $begingroup$

              $f(x) = (sin(x)+1)^x = (e^{ln(sin(x)+1)})^x = e^{x ln(sin(x)+1)}$.



              Then $f'(x) = e^{x ln(sin(x)+1)} * frac{d}{dx} [x ln(sin(x)+1)]$



              by the rules for differentiating exponentials, and the chain rule.



              Now $frac{d}{dx} [x ln(sin(x)+1)] = ln(sin(x)+1) + x * frac{1}{sin(x)+1} * cos(x)$



              by a combination of the product rule and chain rule.



              Now simply insert the value of $frac{3pi}{2}$ and see what happens (I don't have time to do this at the moment).






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                $f(x) = (sin(x)+1)^x = (e^{ln(sin(x)+1)})^x = e^{x ln(sin(x)+1)}$.



                Then $f'(x) = e^{x ln(sin(x)+1)} * frac{d}{dx} [x ln(sin(x)+1)]$



                by the rules for differentiating exponentials, and the chain rule.



                Now $frac{d}{dx} [x ln(sin(x)+1)] = ln(sin(x)+1) + x * frac{1}{sin(x)+1} * cos(x)$



                by a combination of the product rule and chain rule.



                Now simply insert the value of $frac{3pi}{2}$ and see what happens (I don't have time to do this at the moment).






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  $f(x) = (sin(x)+1)^x = (e^{ln(sin(x)+1)})^x = e^{x ln(sin(x)+1)}$.



                  Then $f'(x) = e^{x ln(sin(x)+1)} * frac{d}{dx} [x ln(sin(x)+1)]$



                  by the rules for differentiating exponentials, and the chain rule.



                  Now $frac{d}{dx} [x ln(sin(x)+1)] = ln(sin(x)+1) + x * frac{1}{sin(x)+1} * cos(x)$



                  by a combination of the product rule and chain rule.



                  Now simply insert the value of $frac{3pi}{2}$ and see what happens (I don't have time to do this at the moment).






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  $f(x) = (sin(x)+1)^x = (e^{ln(sin(x)+1)})^x = e^{x ln(sin(x)+1)}$.



                  Then $f'(x) = e^{x ln(sin(x)+1)} * frac{d}{dx} [x ln(sin(x)+1)]$



                  by the rules for differentiating exponentials, and the chain rule.



                  Now $frac{d}{dx} [x ln(sin(x)+1)] = ln(sin(x)+1) + x * frac{1}{sin(x)+1} * cos(x)$



                  by a combination of the product rule and chain rule.



                  Now simply insert the value of $frac{3pi}{2}$ and see what happens (I don't have time to do this at the moment).







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Oct 28 '13 at 19:13









                  MartinMartin

                  165217




                  165217























                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      Graph of $f(x)$:





                      Graph of $f'(x)$:





                      See both the above graphs.
                      $f(x)$ is actually not differentiable at $x= 1.5π$. The graph of $f'(x)$ at $x = 1.5π$ is a vertical asymptote. The function's second differential may say that it is increasing/decreasing at $x= 1.5π$ but the first derivative doesn't exist.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        Link for f '(x) : drive.google.com/file/d/1PYH7H1fAc41qC6g6G4PQOQeXYRY72hK9/…
                        $endgroup$
                        – Madhav
                        Jan 10 '18 at 2:55












                      • $begingroup$
                        It would be much more useful if you were to upload the images somewhere such that they can be embedded into your post. As it is right now, your answer is quite hard to follow.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Xander Henderson
                        Jan 10 '18 at 4:22
















                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      Graph of $f(x)$:





                      Graph of $f'(x)$:





                      See both the above graphs.
                      $f(x)$ is actually not differentiable at $x= 1.5π$. The graph of $f'(x)$ at $x = 1.5π$ is a vertical asymptote. The function's second differential may say that it is increasing/decreasing at $x= 1.5π$ but the first derivative doesn't exist.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        Link for f '(x) : drive.google.com/file/d/1PYH7H1fAc41qC6g6G4PQOQeXYRY72hK9/…
                        $endgroup$
                        – Madhav
                        Jan 10 '18 at 2:55












                      • $begingroup$
                        It would be much more useful if you were to upload the images somewhere such that they can be embedded into your post. As it is right now, your answer is quite hard to follow.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Xander Henderson
                        Jan 10 '18 at 4:22














                      0












                      0








                      0





                      $begingroup$

                      Graph of $f(x)$:





                      Graph of $f'(x)$:





                      See both the above graphs.
                      $f(x)$ is actually not differentiable at $x= 1.5π$. The graph of $f'(x)$ at $x = 1.5π$ is a vertical asymptote. The function's second differential may say that it is increasing/decreasing at $x= 1.5π$ but the first derivative doesn't exist.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      Graph of $f(x)$:





                      Graph of $f'(x)$:





                      See both the above graphs.
                      $f(x)$ is actually not differentiable at $x= 1.5π$. The graph of $f'(x)$ at $x = 1.5π$ is a vertical asymptote. The function's second differential may say that it is increasing/decreasing at $x= 1.5π$ but the first derivative doesn't exist.







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      edited Jan 10 '18 at 5:36









                      Saad

                      19.7k92352




                      19.7k92352










                      answered Jan 10 '18 at 2:54









                      MadhavMadhav

                      11




                      11












                      • $begingroup$
                        Link for f '(x) : drive.google.com/file/d/1PYH7H1fAc41qC6g6G4PQOQeXYRY72hK9/…
                        $endgroup$
                        – Madhav
                        Jan 10 '18 at 2:55












                      • $begingroup$
                        It would be much more useful if you were to upload the images somewhere such that they can be embedded into your post. As it is right now, your answer is quite hard to follow.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Xander Henderson
                        Jan 10 '18 at 4:22


















                      • $begingroup$
                        Link for f '(x) : drive.google.com/file/d/1PYH7H1fAc41qC6g6G4PQOQeXYRY72hK9/…
                        $endgroup$
                        – Madhav
                        Jan 10 '18 at 2:55












                      • $begingroup$
                        It would be much more useful if you were to upload the images somewhere such that they can be embedded into your post. As it is right now, your answer is quite hard to follow.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Xander Henderson
                        Jan 10 '18 at 4:22
















                      $begingroup$
                      Link for f '(x) : drive.google.com/file/d/1PYH7H1fAc41qC6g6G4PQOQeXYRY72hK9/…
                      $endgroup$
                      – Madhav
                      Jan 10 '18 at 2:55






                      $begingroup$
                      Link for f '(x) : drive.google.com/file/d/1PYH7H1fAc41qC6g6G4PQOQeXYRY72hK9/…
                      $endgroup$
                      – Madhav
                      Jan 10 '18 at 2:55














                      $begingroup$
                      It would be much more useful if you were to upload the images somewhere such that they can be embedded into your post. As it is right now, your answer is quite hard to follow.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Xander Henderson
                      Jan 10 '18 at 4:22




                      $begingroup$
                      It would be much more useful if you were to upload the images somewhere such that they can be embedded into your post. As it is right now, your answer is quite hard to follow.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Xander Henderson
                      Jan 10 '18 at 4:22











                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      Not completely sure what you're looking for here, but a simple way of solving this is the chain rule.



                      $f(x)=(sin{x} +1)^x$



                      First you have to realize that you're dealing with a chain in the form of $a^x$. Since the derivative of $a^x$ is $ln(a)cdot a^x$.



                      Set $sin(x)+1$ equal to $u$
                      Then your function looks like this



                      $f(x)=u^x$



                      In the chain rule, you take the derivative and write ignore the $u$ and then multiply it by the derivative of the $u$.



                      We will take the derivative of $u^x$ then multiply it by the derivative of $u$
                      Shown here



                      $f'(x)=ln(u)cdot(u^x)cdot frac{du}{dx}$



                      Plug in the blop for u



                      $f'(x)= ln(sin{x} +1)cdot(sin{x} +1)^x cdotfrac{d}{dx} (sin{x} +1)$



                      Then take the derivative of the $sin{x} + 1$ which is $cos{x}$ because the derivative of a constant is 0



                      $f(x)= ln(sin{x} +1)cdot(sin{x} +1)^x cdot cos{x}$



                      Then plug in $frac{3pi}{2}$



                      $f'(3π/2)= ln(sinfrac{3pi}{2} +1)cdot(sin{frac{3pi}{2}})^{(frac{3pi}{2})} cdot cosfrac{3pi}{2}$



                      Since $cosfrac{3pi}{2} = 0$ then $f'(frac{3pi}{2}) = 0$ because anything multiplied by 0 becomes 0.
                      You didn't have to use the rules of logarithms to accomplish this, unless your teacher specifically asks you to...






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$









                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Note that you can format your post using $LaTeX$ syntax. E.g. $LaTeX$.
                        $endgroup$
                        – jgon
                        Nov 7 '15 at 19:48
















                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      Not completely sure what you're looking for here, but a simple way of solving this is the chain rule.



                      $f(x)=(sin{x} +1)^x$



                      First you have to realize that you're dealing with a chain in the form of $a^x$. Since the derivative of $a^x$ is $ln(a)cdot a^x$.



                      Set $sin(x)+1$ equal to $u$
                      Then your function looks like this



                      $f(x)=u^x$



                      In the chain rule, you take the derivative and write ignore the $u$ and then multiply it by the derivative of the $u$.



                      We will take the derivative of $u^x$ then multiply it by the derivative of $u$
                      Shown here



                      $f'(x)=ln(u)cdot(u^x)cdot frac{du}{dx}$



                      Plug in the blop for u



                      $f'(x)= ln(sin{x} +1)cdot(sin{x} +1)^x cdotfrac{d}{dx} (sin{x} +1)$



                      Then take the derivative of the $sin{x} + 1$ which is $cos{x}$ because the derivative of a constant is 0



                      $f(x)= ln(sin{x} +1)cdot(sin{x} +1)^x cdot cos{x}$



                      Then plug in $frac{3pi}{2}$



                      $f'(3π/2)= ln(sinfrac{3pi}{2} +1)cdot(sin{frac{3pi}{2}})^{(frac{3pi}{2})} cdot cosfrac{3pi}{2}$



                      Since $cosfrac{3pi}{2} = 0$ then $f'(frac{3pi}{2}) = 0$ because anything multiplied by 0 becomes 0.
                      You didn't have to use the rules of logarithms to accomplish this, unless your teacher specifically asks you to...






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$









                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Note that you can format your post using $LaTeX$ syntax. E.g. $LaTeX$.
                        $endgroup$
                        – jgon
                        Nov 7 '15 at 19:48














                      0












                      0








                      0





                      $begingroup$

                      Not completely sure what you're looking for here, but a simple way of solving this is the chain rule.



                      $f(x)=(sin{x} +1)^x$



                      First you have to realize that you're dealing with a chain in the form of $a^x$. Since the derivative of $a^x$ is $ln(a)cdot a^x$.



                      Set $sin(x)+1$ equal to $u$
                      Then your function looks like this



                      $f(x)=u^x$



                      In the chain rule, you take the derivative and write ignore the $u$ and then multiply it by the derivative of the $u$.



                      We will take the derivative of $u^x$ then multiply it by the derivative of $u$
                      Shown here



                      $f'(x)=ln(u)cdot(u^x)cdot frac{du}{dx}$



                      Plug in the blop for u



                      $f'(x)= ln(sin{x} +1)cdot(sin{x} +1)^x cdotfrac{d}{dx} (sin{x} +1)$



                      Then take the derivative of the $sin{x} + 1$ which is $cos{x}$ because the derivative of a constant is 0



                      $f(x)= ln(sin{x} +1)cdot(sin{x} +1)^x cdot cos{x}$



                      Then plug in $frac{3pi}{2}$



                      $f'(3π/2)= ln(sinfrac{3pi}{2} +1)cdot(sin{frac{3pi}{2}})^{(frac{3pi}{2})} cdot cosfrac{3pi}{2}$



                      Since $cosfrac{3pi}{2} = 0$ then $f'(frac{3pi}{2}) = 0$ because anything multiplied by 0 becomes 0.
                      You didn't have to use the rules of logarithms to accomplish this, unless your teacher specifically asks you to...






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      Not completely sure what you're looking for here, but a simple way of solving this is the chain rule.



                      $f(x)=(sin{x} +1)^x$



                      First you have to realize that you're dealing with a chain in the form of $a^x$. Since the derivative of $a^x$ is $ln(a)cdot a^x$.



                      Set $sin(x)+1$ equal to $u$
                      Then your function looks like this



                      $f(x)=u^x$



                      In the chain rule, you take the derivative and write ignore the $u$ and then multiply it by the derivative of the $u$.



                      We will take the derivative of $u^x$ then multiply it by the derivative of $u$
                      Shown here



                      $f'(x)=ln(u)cdot(u^x)cdot frac{du}{dx}$



                      Plug in the blop for u



                      $f'(x)= ln(sin{x} +1)cdot(sin{x} +1)^x cdotfrac{d}{dx} (sin{x} +1)$



                      Then take the derivative of the $sin{x} + 1$ which is $cos{x}$ because the derivative of a constant is 0



                      $f(x)= ln(sin{x} +1)cdot(sin{x} +1)^x cdot cos{x}$



                      Then plug in $frac{3pi}{2}$



                      $f'(3π/2)= ln(sinfrac{3pi}{2} +1)cdot(sin{frac{3pi}{2}})^{(frac{3pi}{2})} cdot cosfrac{3pi}{2}$



                      Since $cosfrac{3pi}{2} = 0$ then $f'(frac{3pi}{2}) = 0$ because anything multiplied by 0 becomes 0.
                      You didn't have to use the rules of logarithms to accomplish this, unless your teacher specifically asks you to...







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      edited Jan 15 at 2:03









                      Arvin Singh

                      14117




                      14117










                      answered Nov 7 '15 at 19:21









                      MichelleMaths4youMichelleMaths4you

                      1




                      1








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Note that you can format your post using $LaTeX$ syntax. E.g. $LaTeX$.
                        $endgroup$
                        – jgon
                        Nov 7 '15 at 19:48














                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Note that you can format your post using $LaTeX$ syntax. E.g. $LaTeX$.
                        $endgroup$
                        – jgon
                        Nov 7 '15 at 19:48








                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      Note that you can format your post using $LaTeX$ syntax. E.g. $LaTeX$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – jgon
                      Nov 7 '15 at 19:48




                      $begingroup$
                      Note that you can format your post using $LaTeX$ syntax. E.g. $LaTeX$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – jgon
                      Nov 7 '15 at 19:48











                      -3












                      $begingroup$

                      You can find the first derivative algebraically using the product and chain rules.



                      I rewrote the function as $y=e$ to the power of $ln sin x +1$. Then I rewrote this as e to the power of u. I used the chain rule to find $frac{dy}{du}$, which was the original function (as the derivative of e to the x is just e to the x). The derivite of the inner function $ln sin x+1$ required use of the product and chain rules. We can find the derivitive of the overall function to be $ln sin x+1$ times $cos x csc x +2 cos x$. Then we can substitute in for $x$. Notice how $e$ to the power of $ln 0$ is just $0$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        First off, it is perhaps worth mentioning that you are also using implicit differentiation here (not just the product and chain rules). Second, your answer is quite difficult to follow---it would be vastly improved with a little MathJax formatting. Finally, this question already has several answers---what does your answer add that hasn't been said already?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Xander Henderson
                        Jun 20 '18 at 0:19
















                      -3












                      $begingroup$

                      You can find the first derivative algebraically using the product and chain rules.



                      I rewrote the function as $y=e$ to the power of $ln sin x +1$. Then I rewrote this as e to the power of u. I used the chain rule to find $frac{dy}{du}$, which was the original function (as the derivative of e to the x is just e to the x). The derivite of the inner function $ln sin x+1$ required use of the product and chain rules. We can find the derivitive of the overall function to be $ln sin x+1$ times $cos x csc x +2 cos x$. Then we can substitute in for $x$. Notice how $e$ to the power of $ln 0$ is just $0$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        First off, it is perhaps worth mentioning that you are also using implicit differentiation here (not just the product and chain rules). Second, your answer is quite difficult to follow---it would be vastly improved with a little MathJax formatting. Finally, this question already has several answers---what does your answer add that hasn't been said already?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Xander Henderson
                        Jun 20 '18 at 0:19














                      -3












                      -3








                      -3





                      $begingroup$

                      You can find the first derivative algebraically using the product and chain rules.



                      I rewrote the function as $y=e$ to the power of $ln sin x +1$. Then I rewrote this as e to the power of u. I used the chain rule to find $frac{dy}{du}$, which was the original function (as the derivative of e to the x is just e to the x). The derivite of the inner function $ln sin x+1$ required use of the product and chain rules. We can find the derivitive of the overall function to be $ln sin x+1$ times $cos x csc x +2 cos x$. Then we can substitute in for $x$. Notice how $e$ to the power of $ln 0$ is just $0$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      You can find the first derivative algebraically using the product and chain rules.



                      I rewrote the function as $y=e$ to the power of $ln sin x +1$. Then I rewrote this as e to the power of u. I used the chain rule to find $frac{dy}{du}$, which was the original function (as the derivative of e to the x is just e to the x). The derivite of the inner function $ln sin x+1$ required use of the product and chain rules. We can find the derivitive of the overall function to be $ln sin x+1$ times $cos x csc x +2 cos x$. Then we can substitute in for $x$. Notice how $e$ to the power of $ln 0$ is just $0$.







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      edited Jun 20 '18 at 1:08









                      peterh

                      2,16351731




                      2,16351731










                      answered Jun 20 '18 at 0:07









                      user570979user570979

                      1




                      1












                      • $begingroup$
                        First off, it is perhaps worth mentioning that you are also using implicit differentiation here (not just the product and chain rules). Second, your answer is quite difficult to follow---it would be vastly improved with a little MathJax formatting. Finally, this question already has several answers---what does your answer add that hasn't been said already?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Xander Henderson
                        Jun 20 '18 at 0:19


















                      • $begingroup$
                        First off, it is perhaps worth mentioning that you are also using implicit differentiation here (not just the product and chain rules). Second, your answer is quite difficult to follow---it would be vastly improved with a little MathJax formatting. Finally, this question already has several answers---what does your answer add that hasn't been said already?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Xander Henderson
                        Jun 20 '18 at 0:19
















                      $begingroup$
                      First off, it is perhaps worth mentioning that you are also using implicit differentiation here (not just the product and chain rules). Second, your answer is quite difficult to follow---it would be vastly improved with a little MathJax formatting. Finally, this question already has several answers---what does your answer add that hasn't been said already?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Xander Henderson
                      Jun 20 '18 at 0:19




                      $begingroup$
                      First off, it is perhaps worth mentioning that you are also using implicit differentiation here (not just the product and chain rules). Second, your answer is quite difficult to follow---it would be vastly improved with a little MathJax formatting. Finally, this question already has several answers---what does your answer add that hasn't been said already?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Xander Henderson
                      Jun 20 '18 at 0:19


















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f543174%2fdifficult-derivative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Mario Kart Wii

                      What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

                      Antonio Litta Visconti Arese