What does the reparameterization mean in Fréchet distances?












0












$begingroup$


I am trying to understand the definition of frechet distance but I am struggling to understand the reparameterization part in the definition. I got the following definition from wikipedia




Let A and B be two given curves in S. Then, the Fréchet distance between $mathbf A$ and $mathbf B$ is defined as the infimum over all reparameterizations $alpha$ and $beta$ of $[0,1]$ of the maximum over all $t in [0,1]$ of the distance in $mathbf S$ between $mathbf{A(alpha(t))}$ and $mathbf{B(beta(t))}$.




What does it mean by reparameterizations $alpha$ and $beta$ of $[0,1]$ of the maximum over all $t in [0,1]$? Can anyone explain it with an example.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I am trying to understand the definition of frechet distance but I am struggling to understand the reparameterization part in the definition. I got the following definition from wikipedia




    Let A and B be two given curves in S. Then, the Fréchet distance between $mathbf A$ and $mathbf B$ is defined as the infimum over all reparameterizations $alpha$ and $beta$ of $[0,1]$ of the maximum over all $t in [0,1]$ of the distance in $mathbf S$ between $mathbf{A(alpha(t))}$ and $mathbf{B(beta(t))}$.




    What does it mean by reparameterizations $alpha$ and $beta$ of $[0,1]$ of the maximum over all $t in [0,1]$? Can anyone explain it with an example.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0


      0



      $begingroup$


      I am trying to understand the definition of frechet distance but I am struggling to understand the reparameterization part in the definition. I got the following definition from wikipedia




      Let A and B be two given curves in S. Then, the Fréchet distance between $mathbf A$ and $mathbf B$ is defined as the infimum over all reparameterizations $alpha$ and $beta$ of $[0,1]$ of the maximum over all $t in [0,1]$ of the distance in $mathbf S$ between $mathbf{A(alpha(t))}$ and $mathbf{B(beta(t))}$.




      What does it mean by reparameterizations $alpha$ and $beta$ of $[0,1]$ of the maximum over all $t in [0,1]$? Can anyone explain it with an example.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I am trying to understand the definition of frechet distance but I am struggling to understand the reparameterization part in the definition. I got the following definition from wikipedia




      Let A and B be two given curves in S. Then, the Fréchet distance between $mathbf A$ and $mathbf B$ is defined as the infimum over all reparameterizations $alpha$ and $beta$ of $[0,1]$ of the maximum over all $t in [0,1]$ of the distance in $mathbf S$ between $mathbf{A(alpha(t))}$ and $mathbf{B(beta(t))}$.




      What does it mean by reparameterizations $alpha$ and $beta$ of $[0,1]$ of the maximum over all $t in [0,1]$? Can anyone explain it with an example.







      geometry frechet-derivative hausdorff-distance






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 13 at 12:35









      postmortes

      1,89321117




      1,89321117










      asked Jan 12 at 8:30









      RafiRafi

      1




      1






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          The wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fréchet_distance ) refers to a reparametrization as a continuous, non-decreasing surjection, so the Fréchet distance considers all possible curves $alpha$ and $beta$ that are non-decreasing surjections, finds the value of $t$ at which their difference is a maximum, and then takes the greatest of all those maxima.



          A surjection from $[0,1]$ to $[0,1]$ is a map $alpha$ such that there exists some $x$ in $[0,1]$ such that $alpha(x)=y$ has a solution for all $yin[0,1]$. It's possible for any $x$ to map to more than one $y$, the important thing is that no $y$ is missed out.



          The simplest example of a reparametrization is the trivial one $alpha_1(x)=x$. This is clearly surjective since $alpha_1(x)=y$ has the solution $x=y$ for all $yin[0,1]$. It is also non-decreasing since if $x_1<x_2$ then $alpha_1(x_1)<alpha_1(x_2)$ for all $x_1,x_2in[0,1]$.



          A more interesting reparametrization is
          $$alpha_2(x) = frac{sin x}{sin 1}$$ The function $sin$ is monotonically increasing on $[0,1]$, as is its inverse $sin^{-1}$ -- see the graphs.



          Graphs of sin and arcsin



          Dividing through by $sin 1$ ensures that $alpha(0)=0$ and $alpha(1)=1$ so we achieve surjectivity on $[0,1]$ as required.



          Suppose now you have two parabolic curves: $A(t):= t^2$ and $B(t) = t^2+t/2+1/4$. Reparametrizing with $alpha_1$ doesn't change the curves at all, but when we reparametrize with $alpha_2$ we get
          $$A(alpha(t)) = left( frac{sin t}{sin 1} right)^2 quad mbox{and}quad B(alpha(t)) = left( frac{sin t}{sin 1} right)^2 + frac{sin t}{2 sin 1} +1/4 $$
          Since the parabolae are strictly increasing, and the reparamatrization (being non-decreasing) doesn't change that, they have their maxima at $t=1$, and you can quickly calculate that $|A(1)-B(1)| = frac{3}{4} = |A(alpha(1)) - B(alpha(1))|$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070703%2fwhat-does-the-reparameterization-mean-in-fr%25c3%25a9chet-distances%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            The wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fréchet_distance ) refers to a reparametrization as a continuous, non-decreasing surjection, so the Fréchet distance considers all possible curves $alpha$ and $beta$ that are non-decreasing surjections, finds the value of $t$ at which their difference is a maximum, and then takes the greatest of all those maxima.



            A surjection from $[0,1]$ to $[0,1]$ is a map $alpha$ such that there exists some $x$ in $[0,1]$ such that $alpha(x)=y$ has a solution for all $yin[0,1]$. It's possible for any $x$ to map to more than one $y$, the important thing is that no $y$ is missed out.



            The simplest example of a reparametrization is the trivial one $alpha_1(x)=x$. This is clearly surjective since $alpha_1(x)=y$ has the solution $x=y$ for all $yin[0,1]$. It is also non-decreasing since if $x_1<x_2$ then $alpha_1(x_1)<alpha_1(x_2)$ for all $x_1,x_2in[0,1]$.



            A more interesting reparametrization is
            $$alpha_2(x) = frac{sin x}{sin 1}$$ The function $sin$ is monotonically increasing on $[0,1]$, as is its inverse $sin^{-1}$ -- see the graphs.



            Graphs of sin and arcsin



            Dividing through by $sin 1$ ensures that $alpha(0)=0$ and $alpha(1)=1$ so we achieve surjectivity on $[0,1]$ as required.



            Suppose now you have two parabolic curves: $A(t):= t^2$ and $B(t) = t^2+t/2+1/4$. Reparametrizing with $alpha_1$ doesn't change the curves at all, but when we reparametrize with $alpha_2$ we get
            $$A(alpha(t)) = left( frac{sin t}{sin 1} right)^2 quad mbox{and}quad B(alpha(t)) = left( frac{sin t}{sin 1} right)^2 + frac{sin t}{2 sin 1} +1/4 $$
            Since the parabolae are strictly increasing, and the reparamatrization (being non-decreasing) doesn't change that, they have their maxima at $t=1$, and you can quickly calculate that $|A(1)-B(1)| = frac{3}{4} = |A(alpha(1)) - B(alpha(1))|$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              The wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fréchet_distance ) refers to a reparametrization as a continuous, non-decreasing surjection, so the Fréchet distance considers all possible curves $alpha$ and $beta$ that are non-decreasing surjections, finds the value of $t$ at which their difference is a maximum, and then takes the greatest of all those maxima.



              A surjection from $[0,1]$ to $[0,1]$ is a map $alpha$ such that there exists some $x$ in $[0,1]$ such that $alpha(x)=y$ has a solution for all $yin[0,1]$. It's possible for any $x$ to map to more than one $y$, the important thing is that no $y$ is missed out.



              The simplest example of a reparametrization is the trivial one $alpha_1(x)=x$. This is clearly surjective since $alpha_1(x)=y$ has the solution $x=y$ for all $yin[0,1]$. It is also non-decreasing since if $x_1<x_2$ then $alpha_1(x_1)<alpha_1(x_2)$ for all $x_1,x_2in[0,1]$.



              A more interesting reparametrization is
              $$alpha_2(x) = frac{sin x}{sin 1}$$ The function $sin$ is monotonically increasing on $[0,1]$, as is its inverse $sin^{-1}$ -- see the graphs.



              Graphs of sin and arcsin



              Dividing through by $sin 1$ ensures that $alpha(0)=0$ and $alpha(1)=1$ so we achieve surjectivity on $[0,1]$ as required.



              Suppose now you have two parabolic curves: $A(t):= t^2$ and $B(t) = t^2+t/2+1/4$. Reparametrizing with $alpha_1$ doesn't change the curves at all, but when we reparametrize with $alpha_2$ we get
              $$A(alpha(t)) = left( frac{sin t}{sin 1} right)^2 quad mbox{and}quad B(alpha(t)) = left( frac{sin t}{sin 1} right)^2 + frac{sin t}{2 sin 1} +1/4 $$
              Since the parabolae are strictly increasing, and the reparamatrization (being non-decreasing) doesn't change that, they have their maxima at $t=1$, and you can quickly calculate that $|A(1)-B(1)| = frac{3}{4} = |A(alpha(1)) - B(alpha(1))|$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                The wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fréchet_distance ) refers to a reparametrization as a continuous, non-decreasing surjection, so the Fréchet distance considers all possible curves $alpha$ and $beta$ that are non-decreasing surjections, finds the value of $t$ at which their difference is a maximum, and then takes the greatest of all those maxima.



                A surjection from $[0,1]$ to $[0,1]$ is a map $alpha$ such that there exists some $x$ in $[0,1]$ such that $alpha(x)=y$ has a solution for all $yin[0,1]$. It's possible for any $x$ to map to more than one $y$, the important thing is that no $y$ is missed out.



                The simplest example of a reparametrization is the trivial one $alpha_1(x)=x$. This is clearly surjective since $alpha_1(x)=y$ has the solution $x=y$ for all $yin[0,1]$. It is also non-decreasing since if $x_1<x_2$ then $alpha_1(x_1)<alpha_1(x_2)$ for all $x_1,x_2in[0,1]$.



                A more interesting reparametrization is
                $$alpha_2(x) = frac{sin x}{sin 1}$$ The function $sin$ is monotonically increasing on $[0,1]$, as is its inverse $sin^{-1}$ -- see the graphs.



                Graphs of sin and arcsin



                Dividing through by $sin 1$ ensures that $alpha(0)=0$ and $alpha(1)=1$ so we achieve surjectivity on $[0,1]$ as required.



                Suppose now you have two parabolic curves: $A(t):= t^2$ and $B(t) = t^2+t/2+1/4$. Reparametrizing with $alpha_1$ doesn't change the curves at all, but when we reparametrize with $alpha_2$ we get
                $$A(alpha(t)) = left( frac{sin t}{sin 1} right)^2 quad mbox{and}quad B(alpha(t)) = left( frac{sin t}{sin 1} right)^2 + frac{sin t}{2 sin 1} +1/4 $$
                Since the parabolae are strictly increasing, and the reparamatrization (being non-decreasing) doesn't change that, they have their maxima at $t=1$, and you can quickly calculate that $|A(1)-B(1)| = frac{3}{4} = |A(alpha(1)) - B(alpha(1))|$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                The wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fréchet_distance ) refers to a reparametrization as a continuous, non-decreasing surjection, so the Fréchet distance considers all possible curves $alpha$ and $beta$ that are non-decreasing surjections, finds the value of $t$ at which their difference is a maximum, and then takes the greatest of all those maxima.



                A surjection from $[0,1]$ to $[0,1]$ is a map $alpha$ such that there exists some $x$ in $[0,1]$ such that $alpha(x)=y$ has a solution for all $yin[0,1]$. It's possible for any $x$ to map to more than one $y$, the important thing is that no $y$ is missed out.



                The simplest example of a reparametrization is the trivial one $alpha_1(x)=x$. This is clearly surjective since $alpha_1(x)=y$ has the solution $x=y$ for all $yin[0,1]$. It is also non-decreasing since if $x_1<x_2$ then $alpha_1(x_1)<alpha_1(x_2)$ for all $x_1,x_2in[0,1]$.



                A more interesting reparametrization is
                $$alpha_2(x) = frac{sin x}{sin 1}$$ The function $sin$ is monotonically increasing on $[0,1]$, as is its inverse $sin^{-1}$ -- see the graphs.



                Graphs of sin and arcsin



                Dividing through by $sin 1$ ensures that $alpha(0)=0$ and $alpha(1)=1$ so we achieve surjectivity on $[0,1]$ as required.



                Suppose now you have two parabolic curves: $A(t):= t^2$ and $B(t) = t^2+t/2+1/4$. Reparametrizing with $alpha_1$ doesn't change the curves at all, but when we reparametrize with $alpha_2$ we get
                $$A(alpha(t)) = left( frac{sin t}{sin 1} right)^2 quad mbox{and}quad B(alpha(t)) = left( frac{sin t}{sin 1} right)^2 + frac{sin t}{2 sin 1} +1/4 $$
                Since the parabolae are strictly increasing, and the reparamatrization (being non-decreasing) doesn't change that, they have their maxima at $t=1$, and you can quickly calculate that $|A(1)-B(1)| = frac{3}{4} = |A(alpha(1)) - B(alpha(1))|$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 13 at 12:40









                postmortespostmortes

                1,89321117




                1,89321117






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070703%2fwhat-does-the-reparameterization-mean-in-fr%25c3%25a9chet-distances%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Mario Kart Wii

                    Understanding the size os this class of aleatory events

                    Partial Derivative Guidance.