prove $ H(x)geq ln(x)(ln (1 - x))$ for $ 0lt xlt 1$












-1












$begingroup$


The equation below is true i have proved it using values between 0 and 1 but how can I prove it mathematically? I have already reduced it to its simplest form (according to me) and I am kind of stuck at this point:



$$ H(x)geq ln(x)(ln (1 - x)) qquadtext{for}qquad 0lt xlt 1$$



where $$ H(x) = -x ln(x) - (1-x)ln(1-x)$$
Any help will be quite useful to me. Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    -1












    $begingroup$


    The equation below is true i have proved it using values between 0 and 1 but how can I prove it mathematically? I have already reduced it to its simplest form (according to me) and I am kind of stuck at this point:



    $$ H(x)geq ln(x)(ln (1 - x)) qquadtext{for}qquad 0lt xlt 1$$



    where $$ H(x) = -x ln(x) - (1-x)ln(1-x)$$
    Any help will be quite useful to me. Thanks.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      -1












      -1








      -1





      $begingroup$


      The equation below is true i have proved it using values between 0 and 1 but how can I prove it mathematically? I have already reduced it to its simplest form (according to me) and I am kind of stuck at this point:



      $$ H(x)geq ln(x)(ln (1 - x)) qquadtext{for}qquad 0lt xlt 1$$



      where $$ H(x) = -x ln(x) - (1-x)ln(1-x)$$
      Any help will be quite useful to me. Thanks.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      The equation below is true i have proved it using values between 0 and 1 but how can I prove it mathematically? I have already reduced it to its simplest form (according to me) and I am kind of stuck at this point:



      $$ H(x)geq ln(x)(ln (1 - x)) qquadtext{for}qquad 0lt xlt 1$$



      where $$ H(x) = -x ln(x) - (1-x)ln(1-x)$$
      Any help will be quite useful to me. Thanks.







      inequality logarithms






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 13 at 14:09









      Martin R

      27.9k33255




      27.9k33255










      asked Jan 12 at 11:00









      Weez KhanWeez Khan

      135




      135






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          We have to show that
          $$
          f(x) = x ln(x) + (1-x) ln(1-x) + ln(x) ln(1-x) \
          = bigl( ln(x) + 1 - x bigr) bigl( ln(1-x) + x bigr) - x(1-x)
          $$

          is $le 0$ for $0 < x < 1$. Using the “well-known” estimates
          $$
          frac{x-1}{x} le ln(x) le x-1 quad (text{for } x > 0)
          $$

          (see for example How can I prove that $ frac {x-1}{x}leq log xleq x-1$), the first factor can be estimated as
          $$
          0 ge ln(x) + 1 - x ge frac{x-1}{x} + 1-x = -frac{(1-x)^2}{x}
          $$

          and the second factor as
          $$
          0 ge ln(1-x) + x ge frac{-x}{1-x} + x = -frac{x^2}{1-x} , .
          $$

          It follows that
          $$
          f(x) le frac{(1-x)^2}{x} cdot frac{x^2}{1-x} - x(1-x) = 0 , .
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            1












            $begingroup$

            Note that for $0lt xlt1$,
            $$
            x=int_0^x1,mathrm{d}tleoverbrace{int_0^xfrac1{1-t},mathrm{d}t}^{-log(1-x)}leint_0^xfrac1{1-x},mathrm{d}t=frac{x}{1-x}tag1
            $$

            Negating gives,
            $$
            -frac{x}{1-x}lelog(1-x)le-xtag2
            $$

            Therefore,
            $$
            -frac{x^2}{1-x}le x+log(1-x)le0tag3
            $$

            and substituting $xmapsto1-x$,
            $$
            -frac{(1-x)^2}{x}le(1-x)+log(x)le0tag4
            $$

            Multiplying inequalities $(3)$ and $(4)$ gives
            $$
            [x+log(1-x)][(1-x)+log(x)]le x(1-x)tag5
            $$

            which upon rearrangement yields
            $$
            log(1-x)log(x)le-xlog(x)-(1-x)log(x)tag6
            $$

            which is the inequality sought.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$





















              0












              $begingroup$

              One approach is to show that the function $$G(x) = ln(x) ln(1-x) - H(x)$$ is convex, i.e. $G''(x) geq 0$ for $0 < x < 1$. Since $G$ is continuous on $[0,1]$ and $G(0) = G(1) = 0$, it follows that $G(x) leq 0$ on $[0,1]$ yielding the desired inequality.



              A direct calculation gives
              $$
              G''(x) = frac{-ln(x)}{(1-x)^2} + frac{-ln(1-x)}{x^2} - frac{1}{x(1-x)}.
              $$



              The first two terms have a "good" sign, but the third term has a "bad" sign for $0 < x < 1$. Using the elementary inequalities $-ln(1-x) geq x, -ln(x) geq 1-x$ for $0 leq x leq 1$, we get
              $
              G''(x) geq 0.
              $






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













                Your Answer





                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                });
                });
                }, "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070784%2fprove-hx-geq-lnx-ln-1-x-for-0-lt-x-lt-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes








                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                2












                $begingroup$

                We have to show that
                $$
                f(x) = x ln(x) + (1-x) ln(1-x) + ln(x) ln(1-x) \
                = bigl( ln(x) + 1 - x bigr) bigl( ln(1-x) + x bigr) - x(1-x)
                $$

                is $le 0$ for $0 < x < 1$. Using the “well-known” estimates
                $$
                frac{x-1}{x} le ln(x) le x-1 quad (text{for } x > 0)
                $$

                (see for example How can I prove that $ frac {x-1}{x}leq log xleq x-1$), the first factor can be estimated as
                $$
                0 ge ln(x) + 1 - x ge frac{x-1}{x} + 1-x = -frac{(1-x)^2}{x}
                $$

                and the second factor as
                $$
                0 ge ln(1-x) + x ge frac{-x}{1-x} + x = -frac{x^2}{1-x} , .
                $$

                It follows that
                $$
                f(x) le frac{(1-x)^2}{x} cdot frac{x^2}{1-x} - x(1-x) = 0 , .
                $$






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$


















                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  We have to show that
                  $$
                  f(x) = x ln(x) + (1-x) ln(1-x) + ln(x) ln(1-x) \
                  = bigl( ln(x) + 1 - x bigr) bigl( ln(1-x) + x bigr) - x(1-x)
                  $$

                  is $le 0$ for $0 < x < 1$. Using the “well-known” estimates
                  $$
                  frac{x-1}{x} le ln(x) le x-1 quad (text{for } x > 0)
                  $$

                  (see for example How can I prove that $ frac {x-1}{x}leq log xleq x-1$), the first factor can be estimated as
                  $$
                  0 ge ln(x) + 1 - x ge frac{x-1}{x} + 1-x = -frac{(1-x)^2}{x}
                  $$

                  and the second factor as
                  $$
                  0 ge ln(1-x) + x ge frac{-x}{1-x} + x = -frac{x^2}{1-x} , .
                  $$

                  It follows that
                  $$
                  f(x) le frac{(1-x)^2}{x} cdot frac{x^2}{1-x} - x(1-x) = 0 , .
                  $$






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$
















                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    We have to show that
                    $$
                    f(x) = x ln(x) + (1-x) ln(1-x) + ln(x) ln(1-x) \
                    = bigl( ln(x) + 1 - x bigr) bigl( ln(1-x) + x bigr) - x(1-x)
                    $$

                    is $le 0$ for $0 < x < 1$. Using the “well-known” estimates
                    $$
                    frac{x-1}{x} le ln(x) le x-1 quad (text{for } x > 0)
                    $$

                    (see for example How can I prove that $ frac {x-1}{x}leq log xleq x-1$), the first factor can be estimated as
                    $$
                    0 ge ln(x) + 1 - x ge frac{x-1}{x} + 1-x = -frac{(1-x)^2}{x}
                    $$

                    and the second factor as
                    $$
                    0 ge ln(1-x) + x ge frac{-x}{1-x} + x = -frac{x^2}{1-x} , .
                    $$

                    It follows that
                    $$
                    f(x) le frac{(1-x)^2}{x} cdot frac{x^2}{1-x} - x(1-x) = 0 , .
                    $$






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    We have to show that
                    $$
                    f(x) = x ln(x) + (1-x) ln(1-x) + ln(x) ln(1-x) \
                    = bigl( ln(x) + 1 - x bigr) bigl( ln(1-x) + x bigr) - x(1-x)
                    $$

                    is $le 0$ for $0 < x < 1$. Using the “well-known” estimates
                    $$
                    frac{x-1}{x} le ln(x) le x-1 quad (text{for } x > 0)
                    $$

                    (see for example How can I prove that $ frac {x-1}{x}leq log xleq x-1$), the first factor can be estimated as
                    $$
                    0 ge ln(x) + 1 - x ge frac{x-1}{x} + 1-x = -frac{(1-x)^2}{x}
                    $$

                    and the second factor as
                    $$
                    0 ge ln(1-x) + x ge frac{-x}{1-x} + x = -frac{x^2}{1-x} , .
                    $$

                    It follows that
                    $$
                    f(x) le frac{(1-x)^2}{x} cdot frac{x^2}{1-x} - x(1-x) = 0 , .
                    $$







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Jan 13 at 17:35

























                    answered Jan 12 at 18:37









                    Martin RMartin R

                    27.9k33255




                    27.9k33255























                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        Note that for $0lt xlt1$,
                        $$
                        x=int_0^x1,mathrm{d}tleoverbrace{int_0^xfrac1{1-t},mathrm{d}t}^{-log(1-x)}leint_0^xfrac1{1-x},mathrm{d}t=frac{x}{1-x}tag1
                        $$

                        Negating gives,
                        $$
                        -frac{x}{1-x}lelog(1-x)le-xtag2
                        $$

                        Therefore,
                        $$
                        -frac{x^2}{1-x}le x+log(1-x)le0tag3
                        $$

                        and substituting $xmapsto1-x$,
                        $$
                        -frac{(1-x)^2}{x}le(1-x)+log(x)le0tag4
                        $$

                        Multiplying inequalities $(3)$ and $(4)$ gives
                        $$
                        [x+log(1-x)][(1-x)+log(x)]le x(1-x)tag5
                        $$

                        which upon rearrangement yields
                        $$
                        log(1-x)log(x)le-xlog(x)-(1-x)log(x)tag6
                        $$

                        which is the inequality sought.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          Note that for $0lt xlt1$,
                          $$
                          x=int_0^x1,mathrm{d}tleoverbrace{int_0^xfrac1{1-t},mathrm{d}t}^{-log(1-x)}leint_0^xfrac1{1-x},mathrm{d}t=frac{x}{1-x}tag1
                          $$

                          Negating gives,
                          $$
                          -frac{x}{1-x}lelog(1-x)le-xtag2
                          $$

                          Therefore,
                          $$
                          -frac{x^2}{1-x}le x+log(1-x)le0tag3
                          $$

                          and substituting $xmapsto1-x$,
                          $$
                          -frac{(1-x)^2}{x}le(1-x)+log(x)le0tag4
                          $$

                          Multiplying inequalities $(3)$ and $(4)$ gives
                          $$
                          [x+log(1-x)][(1-x)+log(x)]le x(1-x)tag5
                          $$

                          which upon rearrangement yields
                          $$
                          log(1-x)log(x)le-xlog(x)-(1-x)log(x)tag6
                          $$

                          which is the inequality sought.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            Note that for $0lt xlt1$,
                            $$
                            x=int_0^x1,mathrm{d}tleoverbrace{int_0^xfrac1{1-t},mathrm{d}t}^{-log(1-x)}leint_0^xfrac1{1-x},mathrm{d}t=frac{x}{1-x}tag1
                            $$

                            Negating gives,
                            $$
                            -frac{x}{1-x}lelog(1-x)le-xtag2
                            $$

                            Therefore,
                            $$
                            -frac{x^2}{1-x}le x+log(1-x)le0tag3
                            $$

                            and substituting $xmapsto1-x$,
                            $$
                            -frac{(1-x)^2}{x}le(1-x)+log(x)le0tag4
                            $$

                            Multiplying inequalities $(3)$ and $(4)$ gives
                            $$
                            [x+log(1-x)][(1-x)+log(x)]le x(1-x)tag5
                            $$

                            which upon rearrangement yields
                            $$
                            log(1-x)log(x)le-xlog(x)-(1-x)log(x)tag6
                            $$

                            which is the inequality sought.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            Note that for $0lt xlt1$,
                            $$
                            x=int_0^x1,mathrm{d}tleoverbrace{int_0^xfrac1{1-t},mathrm{d}t}^{-log(1-x)}leint_0^xfrac1{1-x},mathrm{d}t=frac{x}{1-x}tag1
                            $$

                            Negating gives,
                            $$
                            -frac{x}{1-x}lelog(1-x)le-xtag2
                            $$

                            Therefore,
                            $$
                            -frac{x^2}{1-x}le x+log(1-x)le0tag3
                            $$

                            and substituting $xmapsto1-x$,
                            $$
                            -frac{(1-x)^2}{x}le(1-x)+log(x)le0tag4
                            $$

                            Multiplying inequalities $(3)$ and $(4)$ gives
                            $$
                            [x+log(1-x)][(1-x)+log(x)]le x(1-x)tag5
                            $$

                            which upon rearrangement yields
                            $$
                            log(1-x)log(x)le-xlog(x)-(1-x)log(x)tag6
                            $$

                            which is the inequality sought.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Jan 13 at 13:35









                            robjohnrobjohn

                            266k27306630




                            266k27306630























                                0












                                $begingroup$

                                One approach is to show that the function $$G(x) = ln(x) ln(1-x) - H(x)$$ is convex, i.e. $G''(x) geq 0$ for $0 < x < 1$. Since $G$ is continuous on $[0,1]$ and $G(0) = G(1) = 0$, it follows that $G(x) leq 0$ on $[0,1]$ yielding the desired inequality.



                                A direct calculation gives
                                $$
                                G''(x) = frac{-ln(x)}{(1-x)^2} + frac{-ln(1-x)}{x^2} - frac{1}{x(1-x)}.
                                $$



                                The first two terms have a "good" sign, but the third term has a "bad" sign for $0 < x < 1$. Using the elementary inequalities $-ln(1-x) geq x, -ln(x) geq 1-x$ for $0 leq x leq 1$, we get
                                $
                                G''(x) geq 0.
                                $






                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$


















                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  One approach is to show that the function $$G(x) = ln(x) ln(1-x) - H(x)$$ is convex, i.e. $G''(x) geq 0$ for $0 < x < 1$. Since $G$ is continuous on $[0,1]$ and $G(0) = G(1) = 0$, it follows that $G(x) leq 0$ on $[0,1]$ yielding the desired inequality.



                                  A direct calculation gives
                                  $$
                                  G''(x) = frac{-ln(x)}{(1-x)^2} + frac{-ln(1-x)}{x^2} - frac{1}{x(1-x)}.
                                  $$



                                  The first two terms have a "good" sign, but the third term has a "bad" sign for $0 < x < 1$. Using the elementary inequalities $-ln(1-x) geq x, -ln(x) geq 1-x$ for $0 leq x leq 1$, we get
                                  $
                                  G''(x) geq 0.
                                  $






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$
















                                    0












                                    0








                                    0





                                    $begingroup$

                                    One approach is to show that the function $$G(x) = ln(x) ln(1-x) - H(x)$$ is convex, i.e. $G''(x) geq 0$ for $0 < x < 1$. Since $G$ is continuous on $[0,1]$ and $G(0) = G(1) = 0$, it follows that $G(x) leq 0$ on $[0,1]$ yielding the desired inequality.



                                    A direct calculation gives
                                    $$
                                    G''(x) = frac{-ln(x)}{(1-x)^2} + frac{-ln(1-x)}{x^2} - frac{1}{x(1-x)}.
                                    $$



                                    The first two terms have a "good" sign, but the third term has a "bad" sign for $0 < x < 1$. Using the elementary inequalities $-ln(1-x) geq x, -ln(x) geq 1-x$ for $0 leq x leq 1$, we get
                                    $
                                    G''(x) geq 0.
                                    $






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$



                                    One approach is to show that the function $$G(x) = ln(x) ln(1-x) - H(x)$$ is convex, i.e. $G''(x) geq 0$ for $0 < x < 1$. Since $G$ is continuous on $[0,1]$ and $G(0) = G(1) = 0$, it follows that $G(x) leq 0$ on $[0,1]$ yielding the desired inequality.



                                    A direct calculation gives
                                    $$
                                    G''(x) = frac{-ln(x)}{(1-x)^2} + frac{-ln(1-x)}{x^2} - frac{1}{x(1-x)}.
                                    $$



                                    The first two terms have a "good" sign, but the third term has a "bad" sign for $0 < x < 1$. Using the elementary inequalities $-ln(1-x) geq x, -ln(x) geq 1-x$ for $0 leq x leq 1$, we get
                                    $
                                    G''(x) geq 0.
                                    $







                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer










                                    answered Jan 12 at 13:05









                                    Shankar VenkataramaniShankar Venkataramani

                                    11




                                    11






























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded




















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070784%2fprove-hx-geq-lnx-ln-1-x-for-0-lt-x-lt-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Mario Kart Wii

                                        What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

                                        Antonio Litta Visconti Arese