Understanding why variance of the standard normal distribution equals one intuitively
$begingroup$
Can anyone explain to me why the variance of the standard normal distribution is 1? I am trying to understand the mechanism behind standardising random variable. While I know minus the variable by the mean is like shifting the graph to make it centre at the origin, I don't know why dividing it by SD makes the variable having SD = 1 as well
calculus linear-algebra statistics linear-transformations normal-distribution
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can anyone explain to me why the variance of the standard normal distribution is 1? I am trying to understand the mechanism behind standardising random variable. While I know minus the variable by the mean is like shifting the graph to make it centre at the origin, I don't know why dividing it by SD makes the variable having SD = 1 as well
calculus linear-algebra statistics linear-transformations normal-distribution
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
It's the definition...if you have a normal distribution with any non-zero standard deviation you can rescale to get $sigma =1 $ so it's really just a matter of units.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 12 at 11:05
$begingroup$
If you view the SD as a thing that tells you how dispersed your distribution is around the mean, then you can understand why dividing your variable by a constant will divide your SD by this constant. So now just divide by the SD itself. Your SD has now become 1.
$endgroup$
– Bermudes
Jan 12 at 11:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can anyone explain to me why the variance of the standard normal distribution is 1? I am trying to understand the mechanism behind standardising random variable. While I know minus the variable by the mean is like shifting the graph to make it centre at the origin, I don't know why dividing it by SD makes the variable having SD = 1 as well
calculus linear-algebra statistics linear-transformations normal-distribution
$endgroup$
Can anyone explain to me why the variance of the standard normal distribution is 1? I am trying to understand the mechanism behind standardising random variable. While I know minus the variable by the mean is like shifting the graph to make it centre at the origin, I don't know why dividing it by SD makes the variable having SD = 1 as well
calculus linear-algebra statistics linear-transformations normal-distribution
calculus linear-algebra statistics linear-transformations normal-distribution
asked Jan 12 at 11:04
Stephen FongStephen Fong
114
114
4
$begingroup$
It's the definition...if you have a normal distribution with any non-zero standard deviation you can rescale to get $sigma =1 $ so it's really just a matter of units.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 12 at 11:05
$begingroup$
If you view the SD as a thing that tells you how dispersed your distribution is around the mean, then you can understand why dividing your variable by a constant will divide your SD by this constant. So now just divide by the SD itself. Your SD has now become 1.
$endgroup$
– Bermudes
Jan 12 at 11:17
add a comment |
4
$begingroup$
It's the definition...if you have a normal distribution with any non-zero standard deviation you can rescale to get $sigma =1 $ so it's really just a matter of units.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 12 at 11:05
$begingroup$
If you view the SD as a thing that tells you how dispersed your distribution is around the mean, then you can understand why dividing your variable by a constant will divide your SD by this constant. So now just divide by the SD itself. Your SD has now become 1.
$endgroup$
– Bermudes
Jan 12 at 11:17
4
4
$begingroup$
It's the definition...if you have a normal distribution with any non-zero standard deviation you can rescale to get $sigma =1 $ so it's really just a matter of units.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 12 at 11:05
$begingroup$
It's the definition...if you have a normal distribution with any non-zero standard deviation you can rescale to get $sigma =1 $ so it's really just a matter of units.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 12 at 11:05
$begingroup$
If you view the SD as a thing that tells you how dispersed your distribution is around the mean, then you can understand why dividing your variable by a constant will divide your SD by this constant. So now just divide by the SD itself. Your SD has now become 1.
$endgroup$
– Bermudes
Jan 12 at 11:17
$begingroup$
If you view the SD as a thing that tells you how dispersed your distribution is around the mean, then you can understand why dividing your variable by a constant will divide your SD by this constant. So now just divide by the SD itself. Your SD has now become 1.
$endgroup$
– Bermudes
Jan 12 at 11:17
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The variance of standard normal distribution is $1$ by definition.
Concerning standardizing: if $X$ has a distribution with standard deviation $sigma_Xneq0$ or equivalently with variance $sigma_X^2$ then for every constant $c$ (also $c=mathbb EX$) we have $mathsf{Var}left(frac{X-c}{sigma_X}right)=1$ according to the rule:$$mathsf{Var}(aY+b)=a^2mathsf{Var}Y$$
Can you deduce this rule yourself?
Applying it on $Y=frac{X-c}{sigma_X}$ we get: $$mathsf{Var}(sigma_X^{-1}X+(-sigma_X^{-1}c))=sigma_X^{-2}mathsf{Var}X=sigma_X^{-2}sigma_X^{2}=1$$
This means that we can write $X=sigma_XU+mu_X$ where $U:=frac{X-mu_X}{sigma_X}$ has mean $0$ and variance $1$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $Xsim N(mu,sigma^2)$ and $Z=frac{X-mu}{sigma}$, then $Zsim N(0,1)$, because:
$$mathbb Eleft(frac{X-mu}{sigma}right)=frac{1}{sigma}cdot mathbb E(X-mu)=frac1{sigma}cdot mathbb E(X)-frac{mu}{sigma}=0;\
sigma^2left(frac{X-mu}{sigma}right)=frac{1}{sigma^2}cdot sigma^2(X-mu)=frac1{sigma^2}cdot sigma^2(X)=1.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070788%2funderstanding-why-variance-of-the-standard-normal-distribution-equals-one-intuit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The variance of standard normal distribution is $1$ by definition.
Concerning standardizing: if $X$ has a distribution with standard deviation $sigma_Xneq0$ or equivalently with variance $sigma_X^2$ then for every constant $c$ (also $c=mathbb EX$) we have $mathsf{Var}left(frac{X-c}{sigma_X}right)=1$ according to the rule:$$mathsf{Var}(aY+b)=a^2mathsf{Var}Y$$
Can you deduce this rule yourself?
Applying it on $Y=frac{X-c}{sigma_X}$ we get: $$mathsf{Var}(sigma_X^{-1}X+(-sigma_X^{-1}c))=sigma_X^{-2}mathsf{Var}X=sigma_X^{-2}sigma_X^{2}=1$$
This means that we can write $X=sigma_XU+mu_X$ where $U:=frac{X-mu_X}{sigma_X}$ has mean $0$ and variance $1$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The variance of standard normal distribution is $1$ by definition.
Concerning standardizing: if $X$ has a distribution with standard deviation $sigma_Xneq0$ or equivalently with variance $sigma_X^2$ then for every constant $c$ (also $c=mathbb EX$) we have $mathsf{Var}left(frac{X-c}{sigma_X}right)=1$ according to the rule:$$mathsf{Var}(aY+b)=a^2mathsf{Var}Y$$
Can you deduce this rule yourself?
Applying it on $Y=frac{X-c}{sigma_X}$ we get: $$mathsf{Var}(sigma_X^{-1}X+(-sigma_X^{-1}c))=sigma_X^{-2}mathsf{Var}X=sigma_X^{-2}sigma_X^{2}=1$$
This means that we can write $X=sigma_XU+mu_X$ where $U:=frac{X-mu_X}{sigma_X}$ has mean $0$ and variance $1$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The variance of standard normal distribution is $1$ by definition.
Concerning standardizing: if $X$ has a distribution with standard deviation $sigma_Xneq0$ or equivalently with variance $sigma_X^2$ then for every constant $c$ (also $c=mathbb EX$) we have $mathsf{Var}left(frac{X-c}{sigma_X}right)=1$ according to the rule:$$mathsf{Var}(aY+b)=a^2mathsf{Var}Y$$
Can you deduce this rule yourself?
Applying it on $Y=frac{X-c}{sigma_X}$ we get: $$mathsf{Var}(sigma_X^{-1}X+(-sigma_X^{-1}c))=sigma_X^{-2}mathsf{Var}X=sigma_X^{-2}sigma_X^{2}=1$$
This means that we can write $X=sigma_XU+mu_X$ where $U:=frac{X-mu_X}{sigma_X}$ has mean $0$ and variance $1$.
$endgroup$
The variance of standard normal distribution is $1$ by definition.
Concerning standardizing: if $X$ has a distribution with standard deviation $sigma_Xneq0$ or equivalently with variance $sigma_X^2$ then for every constant $c$ (also $c=mathbb EX$) we have $mathsf{Var}left(frac{X-c}{sigma_X}right)=1$ according to the rule:$$mathsf{Var}(aY+b)=a^2mathsf{Var}Y$$
Can you deduce this rule yourself?
Applying it on $Y=frac{X-c}{sigma_X}$ we get: $$mathsf{Var}(sigma_X^{-1}X+(-sigma_X^{-1}c))=sigma_X^{-2}mathsf{Var}X=sigma_X^{-2}sigma_X^{2}=1$$
This means that we can write $X=sigma_XU+mu_X$ where $U:=frac{X-mu_X}{sigma_X}$ has mean $0$ and variance $1$.
answered Jan 12 at 11:21
drhabdrhab
99.9k544130
99.9k544130
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $Xsim N(mu,sigma^2)$ and $Z=frac{X-mu}{sigma}$, then $Zsim N(0,1)$, because:
$$mathbb Eleft(frac{X-mu}{sigma}right)=frac{1}{sigma}cdot mathbb E(X-mu)=frac1{sigma}cdot mathbb E(X)-frac{mu}{sigma}=0;\
sigma^2left(frac{X-mu}{sigma}right)=frac{1}{sigma^2}cdot sigma^2(X-mu)=frac1{sigma^2}cdot sigma^2(X)=1.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $Xsim N(mu,sigma^2)$ and $Z=frac{X-mu}{sigma}$, then $Zsim N(0,1)$, because:
$$mathbb Eleft(frac{X-mu}{sigma}right)=frac{1}{sigma}cdot mathbb E(X-mu)=frac1{sigma}cdot mathbb E(X)-frac{mu}{sigma}=0;\
sigma^2left(frac{X-mu}{sigma}right)=frac{1}{sigma^2}cdot sigma^2(X-mu)=frac1{sigma^2}cdot sigma^2(X)=1.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $Xsim N(mu,sigma^2)$ and $Z=frac{X-mu}{sigma}$, then $Zsim N(0,1)$, because:
$$mathbb Eleft(frac{X-mu}{sigma}right)=frac{1}{sigma}cdot mathbb E(X-mu)=frac1{sigma}cdot mathbb E(X)-frac{mu}{sigma}=0;\
sigma^2left(frac{X-mu}{sigma}right)=frac{1}{sigma^2}cdot sigma^2(X-mu)=frac1{sigma^2}cdot sigma^2(X)=1.$$
$endgroup$
Let $Xsim N(mu,sigma^2)$ and $Z=frac{X-mu}{sigma}$, then $Zsim N(0,1)$, because:
$$mathbb Eleft(frac{X-mu}{sigma}right)=frac{1}{sigma}cdot mathbb E(X-mu)=frac1{sigma}cdot mathbb E(X)-frac{mu}{sigma}=0;\
sigma^2left(frac{X-mu}{sigma}right)=frac{1}{sigma^2}cdot sigma^2(X-mu)=frac1{sigma^2}cdot sigma^2(X)=1.$$
answered Jan 12 at 12:11
farruhotafarruhota
19.9k2738
19.9k2738
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070788%2funderstanding-why-variance-of-the-standard-normal-distribution-equals-one-intuit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
$begingroup$
It's the definition...if you have a normal distribution with any non-zero standard deviation you can rescale to get $sigma =1 $ so it's really just a matter of units.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 12 at 11:05
$begingroup$
If you view the SD as a thing that tells you how dispersed your distribution is around the mean, then you can understand why dividing your variable by a constant will divide your SD by this constant. So now just divide by the SD itself. Your SD has now become 1.
$endgroup$
– Bermudes
Jan 12 at 11:17