Arc length of gamma function curve equals its value - coincidence?
$begingroup$
While perusing Wolfram Alpha, I stumbled upon a strange curiosity involving the Gamma function:
The arc length of $Gamma(x + 1)$ from 1 to $x$ very closely equals the numeric value of $Gamma(x)$.
Examples for $x = $...
- (Not evaluated)
- $Gamma(2+1) = 2;~~~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 2 = 1.442...
- $Gamma(3+1) = 6;~~~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 3 = 5.5846...
- $Gamma(4+1) = 24;~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 4 = 23.6185...
- $Gamma(5+1) = 120;~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 5 = 119.625...
- $Gamma(6+1) = 720;~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 6 = 719.626...
Question
Is this an unusual or seldom-discussed-but-fascinating mathematical coincidence?
Or, am I missing some obvious numerical relationship staring me right in my eyes? ;-)
P.S. I am aware of how the gamma function extends factorial to $mathbb{R}$, but with the $+1$ offset.
gamma-function arc-length coincidences
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
While perusing Wolfram Alpha, I stumbled upon a strange curiosity involving the Gamma function:
The arc length of $Gamma(x + 1)$ from 1 to $x$ very closely equals the numeric value of $Gamma(x)$.
Examples for $x = $...
- (Not evaluated)
- $Gamma(2+1) = 2;~~~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 2 = 1.442...
- $Gamma(3+1) = 6;~~~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 3 = 5.5846...
- $Gamma(4+1) = 24;~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 4 = 23.6185...
- $Gamma(5+1) = 120;~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 5 = 119.625...
- $Gamma(6+1) = 720;~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 6 = 719.626...
Question
Is this an unusual or seldom-discussed-but-fascinating mathematical coincidence?
Or, am I missing some obvious numerical relationship staring me right in my eyes? ;-)
P.S. I am aware of how the gamma function extends factorial to $mathbb{R}$, but with the $+1$ offset.
gamma-function arc-length coincidences
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
While perusing Wolfram Alpha, I stumbled upon a strange curiosity involving the Gamma function:
The arc length of $Gamma(x + 1)$ from 1 to $x$ very closely equals the numeric value of $Gamma(x)$.
Examples for $x = $...
- (Not evaluated)
- $Gamma(2+1) = 2;~~~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 2 = 1.442...
- $Gamma(3+1) = 6;~~~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 3 = 5.5846...
- $Gamma(4+1) = 24;~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 4 = 23.6185...
- $Gamma(5+1) = 120;~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 5 = 119.625...
- $Gamma(6+1) = 720;~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 6 = 719.626...
Question
Is this an unusual or seldom-discussed-but-fascinating mathematical coincidence?
Or, am I missing some obvious numerical relationship staring me right in my eyes? ;-)
P.S. I am aware of how the gamma function extends factorial to $mathbb{R}$, but with the $+1$ offset.
gamma-function arc-length coincidences
$endgroup$
While perusing Wolfram Alpha, I stumbled upon a strange curiosity involving the Gamma function:
The arc length of $Gamma(x + 1)$ from 1 to $x$ very closely equals the numeric value of $Gamma(x)$.
Examples for $x = $...
- (Not evaluated)
- $Gamma(2+1) = 2;~~~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 2 = 1.442...
- $Gamma(3+1) = 6;~~~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 3 = 5.5846...
- $Gamma(4+1) = 24;~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 4 = 23.6185...
- $Gamma(5+1) = 120;~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 5 = 119.625...
- $Gamma(6+1) = 720;~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 6 = 719.626...
Question
Is this an unusual or seldom-discussed-but-fascinating mathematical coincidence?
Or, am I missing some obvious numerical relationship staring me right in my eyes? ;-)
P.S. I am aware of how the gamma function extends factorial to $mathbb{R}$, but with the $+1$ offset.
gamma-function arc-length coincidences
gamma-function arc-length coincidences
asked Mar 12 '17 at 20:11
pr1268pr1268
16815
16815
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your arc length can be written as $$L=int_1^x sqrt{Gamma'^2(t)+1},dt$$ where $Gamma'^2(t)$ is the derivative of $Gamma(t)$. When $x$ is large enough, $Gamma'^2(t)gg 1$, the integral is dominated by the large values of $t$, then $$Lsim int_1^xGamma'(t),dtsim Gamma(x)-1sim Gamma(x)$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a trivial property.
For any function with a large derivative,
$$intsqrt{1+f'^2(x)},dxapproxint f'(x),dx=f(x)+C.$$
For example with the exponential $e^x$,
$$intsqrt{1+e^{2x}},dx=sqrt{1+e^{2x}}+text{arcoth}sqrt{1+e^{2x}}+C$$
which is asymptotic to $e^x$.
Intuitively, this is because the horizontal displacement brings a neglectable contribution when the curve gets close to vertical.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2183775%2farc-length-of-gamma-function-curve-equals-its-value-coincidence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your arc length can be written as $$L=int_1^x sqrt{Gamma'^2(t)+1},dt$$ where $Gamma'^2(t)$ is the derivative of $Gamma(t)$. When $x$ is large enough, $Gamma'^2(t)gg 1$, the integral is dominated by the large values of $t$, then $$Lsim int_1^xGamma'(t),dtsim Gamma(x)-1sim Gamma(x)$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your arc length can be written as $$L=int_1^x sqrt{Gamma'^2(t)+1},dt$$ where $Gamma'^2(t)$ is the derivative of $Gamma(t)$. When $x$ is large enough, $Gamma'^2(t)gg 1$, the integral is dominated by the large values of $t$, then $$Lsim int_1^xGamma'(t),dtsim Gamma(x)-1sim Gamma(x)$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your arc length can be written as $$L=int_1^x sqrt{Gamma'^2(t)+1},dt$$ where $Gamma'^2(t)$ is the derivative of $Gamma(t)$. When $x$ is large enough, $Gamma'^2(t)gg 1$, the integral is dominated by the large values of $t$, then $$Lsim int_1^xGamma'(t),dtsim Gamma(x)-1sim Gamma(x)$$
$endgroup$
Your arc length can be written as $$L=int_1^x sqrt{Gamma'^2(t)+1},dt$$ where $Gamma'^2(t)$ is the derivative of $Gamma(t)$. When $x$ is large enough, $Gamma'^2(t)gg 1$, the integral is dominated by the large values of $t$, then $$Lsim int_1^xGamma'(t),dtsim Gamma(x)-1sim Gamma(x)$$
edited Mar 12 '17 at 21:01
answered Mar 12 '17 at 20:44
Paul EntaPaul Enta
4,70611333
4,70611333
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a trivial property.
For any function with a large derivative,
$$intsqrt{1+f'^2(x)},dxapproxint f'(x),dx=f(x)+C.$$
For example with the exponential $e^x$,
$$intsqrt{1+e^{2x}},dx=sqrt{1+e^{2x}}+text{arcoth}sqrt{1+e^{2x}}+C$$
which is asymptotic to $e^x$.
Intuitively, this is because the horizontal displacement brings a neglectable contribution when the curve gets close to vertical.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a trivial property.
For any function with a large derivative,
$$intsqrt{1+f'^2(x)},dxapproxint f'(x),dx=f(x)+C.$$
For example with the exponential $e^x$,
$$intsqrt{1+e^{2x}},dx=sqrt{1+e^{2x}}+text{arcoth}sqrt{1+e^{2x}}+C$$
which is asymptotic to $e^x$.
Intuitively, this is because the horizontal displacement brings a neglectable contribution when the curve gets close to vertical.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a trivial property.
For any function with a large derivative,
$$intsqrt{1+f'^2(x)},dxapproxint f'(x),dx=f(x)+C.$$
For example with the exponential $e^x$,
$$intsqrt{1+e^{2x}},dx=sqrt{1+e^{2x}}+text{arcoth}sqrt{1+e^{2x}}+C$$
which is asymptotic to $e^x$.
Intuitively, this is because the horizontal displacement brings a neglectable contribution when the curve gets close to vertical.
$endgroup$
This is a trivial property.
For any function with a large derivative,
$$intsqrt{1+f'^2(x)},dxapproxint f'(x),dx=f(x)+C.$$
For example with the exponential $e^x$,
$$intsqrt{1+e^{2x}},dx=sqrt{1+e^{2x}}+text{arcoth}sqrt{1+e^{2x}}+C$$
which is asymptotic to $e^x$.
Intuitively, this is because the horizontal displacement brings a neglectable contribution when the curve gets close to vertical.
edited Jan 12 at 10:00
answered Mar 12 '17 at 20:57
Yves DaoustYves Daoust
125k671223
125k671223
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2183775%2farc-length-of-gamma-function-curve-equals-its-value-coincidence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown