Arc length of gamma function curve equals its value - coincidence?












3












$begingroup$


While perusing Wolfram Alpha, I stumbled upon a strange curiosity involving the Gamma function:




The arc length of $Gamma(x + 1)$ from 1 to $x$ very closely equals the numeric value of $Gamma(x)$.




Examples for $x = $...




  1. (Not evaluated)

  2. $Gamma(2+1) = 2;~~~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 2 = 1.442...

  3. $Gamma(3+1) = 6;~~~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 3 = 5.5846...

  4. $Gamma(4+1) = 24;~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 4 = 23.6185...

  5. $Gamma(5+1) = 120;~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 5 = 119.625...

  6. $Gamma(6+1) = 720;~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 6 = 719.626...


Question




Is this an unusual or seldom-discussed-but-fascinating mathematical coincidence?




Or, am I missing some obvious numerical relationship staring me right in my eyes? ;-)



P.S. I am aware of how the gamma function extends factorial to $mathbb{R}$, but with the $+1$ offset.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    While perusing Wolfram Alpha, I stumbled upon a strange curiosity involving the Gamma function:




    The arc length of $Gamma(x + 1)$ from 1 to $x$ very closely equals the numeric value of $Gamma(x)$.




    Examples for $x = $...




    1. (Not evaluated)

    2. $Gamma(2+1) = 2;~~~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 2 = 1.442...

    3. $Gamma(3+1) = 6;~~~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 3 = 5.5846...

    4. $Gamma(4+1) = 24;~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 4 = 23.6185...

    5. $Gamma(5+1) = 120;~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 5 = 119.625...

    6. $Gamma(6+1) = 720;~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 6 = 719.626...


    Question




    Is this an unusual or seldom-discussed-but-fascinating mathematical coincidence?




    Or, am I missing some obvious numerical relationship staring me right in my eyes? ;-)



    P.S. I am aware of how the gamma function extends factorial to $mathbb{R}$, but with the $+1$ offset.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      While perusing Wolfram Alpha, I stumbled upon a strange curiosity involving the Gamma function:




      The arc length of $Gamma(x + 1)$ from 1 to $x$ very closely equals the numeric value of $Gamma(x)$.




      Examples for $x = $...




      1. (Not evaluated)

      2. $Gamma(2+1) = 2;~~~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 2 = 1.442...

      3. $Gamma(3+1) = 6;~~~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 3 = 5.5846...

      4. $Gamma(4+1) = 24;~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 4 = 23.6185...

      5. $Gamma(5+1) = 120;~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 5 = 119.625...

      6. $Gamma(6+1) = 720;~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 6 = 719.626...


      Question




      Is this an unusual or seldom-discussed-but-fascinating mathematical coincidence?




      Or, am I missing some obvious numerical relationship staring me right in my eyes? ;-)



      P.S. I am aware of how the gamma function extends factorial to $mathbb{R}$, but with the $+1$ offset.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      While perusing Wolfram Alpha, I stumbled upon a strange curiosity involving the Gamma function:




      The arc length of $Gamma(x + 1)$ from 1 to $x$ very closely equals the numeric value of $Gamma(x)$.




      Examples for $x = $...




      1. (Not evaluated)

      2. $Gamma(2+1) = 2;~~~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 2 = 1.442...

      3. $Gamma(3+1) = 6;~~~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 3 = 5.5846...

      4. $Gamma(4+1) = 24;~~~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 4 = 23.6185...

      5. $Gamma(5+1) = 120;~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 5 = 119.625...

      6. $Gamma(6+1) = 720;~~$ Arc length of $Gamma(x+1)$ from 1 to 6 = 719.626...


      Question




      Is this an unusual or seldom-discussed-but-fascinating mathematical coincidence?




      Or, am I missing some obvious numerical relationship staring me right in my eyes? ;-)



      P.S. I am aware of how the gamma function extends factorial to $mathbb{R}$, but with the $+1$ offset.







      gamma-function arc-length coincidences






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 12 '17 at 20:11









      pr1268pr1268

      16815




      16815






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Your arc length can be written as $$L=int_1^x sqrt{Gamma'^2(t)+1},dt$$ where $Gamma'^2(t)$ is the derivative of $Gamma(t)$. When $x$ is large enough, $Gamma'^2(t)gg 1$, the integral is dominated by the large values of $t$, then $$Lsim int_1^xGamma'(t),dtsim Gamma(x)-1sim Gamma(x)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            2












            $begingroup$

            This is a trivial property.



            For any function with a large derivative,



            $$intsqrt{1+f'^2(x)},dxapproxint f'(x),dx=f(x)+C.$$



            For example with the exponential $e^x$,



            $$intsqrt{1+e^{2x}},dx=sqrt{1+e^{2x}}+text{arcoth}sqrt{1+e^{2x}}+C$$



            which is asymptotic to $e^x$.



            enter image description here



            Intuitively, this is because the horizontal displacement brings a neglectable contribution when the curve gets close to vertical.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2183775%2farc-length-of-gamma-function-curve-equals-its-value-coincidence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2












              $begingroup$

              Your arc length can be written as $$L=int_1^x sqrt{Gamma'^2(t)+1},dt$$ where $Gamma'^2(t)$ is the derivative of $Gamma(t)$. When $x$ is large enough, $Gamma'^2(t)gg 1$, the integral is dominated by the large values of $t$, then $$Lsim int_1^xGamma'(t),dtsim Gamma(x)-1sim Gamma(x)$$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                Your arc length can be written as $$L=int_1^x sqrt{Gamma'^2(t)+1},dt$$ where $Gamma'^2(t)$ is the derivative of $Gamma(t)$. When $x$ is large enough, $Gamma'^2(t)gg 1$, the integral is dominated by the large values of $t$, then $$Lsim int_1^xGamma'(t),dtsim Gamma(x)-1sim Gamma(x)$$






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  Your arc length can be written as $$L=int_1^x sqrt{Gamma'^2(t)+1},dt$$ where $Gamma'^2(t)$ is the derivative of $Gamma(t)$. When $x$ is large enough, $Gamma'^2(t)gg 1$, the integral is dominated by the large values of $t$, then $$Lsim int_1^xGamma'(t),dtsim Gamma(x)-1sim Gamma(x)$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Your arc length can be written as $$L=int_1^x sqrt{Gamma'^2(t)+1},dt$$ where $Gamma'^2(t)$ is the derivative of $Gamma(t)$. When $x$ is large enough, $Gamma'^2(t)gg 1$, the integral is dominated by the large values of $t$, then $$Lsim int_1^xGamma'(t),dtsim Gamma(x)-1sim Gamma(x)$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Mar 12 '17 at 21:01

























                  answered Mar 12 '17 at 20:44









                  Paul EntaPaul Enta

                  4,70611333




                  4,70611333























                      2












                      $begingroup$

                      This is a trivial property.



                      For any function with a large derivative,



                      $$intsqrt{1+f'^2(x)},dxapproxint f'(x),dx=f(x)+C.$$



                      For example with the exponential $e^x$,



                      $$intsqrt{1+e^{2x}},dx=sqrt{1+e^{2x}}+text{arcoth}sqrt{1+e^{2x}}+C$$



                      which is asymptotic to $e^x$.



                      enter image description here



                      Intuitively, this is because the horizontal displacement brings a neglectable contribution when the curve gets close to vertical.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$


















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        This is a trivial property.



                        For any function with a large derivative,



                        $$intsqrt{1+f'^2(x)},dxapproxint f'(x),dx=f(x)+C.$$



                        For example with the exponential $e^x$,



                        $$intsqrt{1+e^{2x}},dx=sqrt{1+e^{2x}}+text{arcoth}sqrt{1+e^{2x}}+C$$



                        which is asymptotic to $e^x$.



                        enter image description here



                        Intuitively, this is because the horizontal displacement brings a neglectable contribution when the curve gets close to vertical.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$
















                          2












                          2








                          2





                          $begingroup$

                          This is a trivial property.



                          For any function with a large derivative,



                          $$intsqrt{1+f'^2(x)},dxapproxint f'(x),dx=f(x)+C.$$



                          For example with the exponential $e^x$,



                          $$intsqrt{1+e^{2x}},dx=sqrt{1+e^{2x}}+text{arcoth}sqrt{1+e^{2x}}+C$$



                          which is asymptotic to $e^x$.



                          enter image description here



                          Intuitively, this is because the horizontal displacement brings a neglectable contribution when the curve gets close to vertical.






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$



                          This is a trivial property.



                          For any function with a large derivative,



                          $$intsqrt{1+f'^2(x)},dxapproxint f'(x),dx=f(x)+C.$$



                          For example with the exponential $e^x$,



                          $$intsqrt{1+e^{2x}},dx=sqrt{1+e^{2x}}+text{arcoth}sqrt{1+e^{2x}}+C$$



                          which is asymptotic to $e^x$.



                          enter image description here



                          Intuitively, this is because the horizontal displacement brings a neglectable contribution when the curve gets close to vertical.







                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          edited Jan 12 at 10:00

























                          answered Mar 12 '17 at 20:57









                          Yves DaoustYves Daoust

                          125k671223




                          125k671223






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2183775%2farc-length-of-gamma-function-curve-equals-its-value-coincidence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Mario Kart Wii

                              What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

                              Antonio Litta Visconti Arese