Why does the real projective plane / Boy surface look like this?












5












$begingroup$



In geometry, Boy's surface is an immersion of the real projective plane in 3-dimensional space found by Werner Boy in 1901




My question is, you can see that the Boy surface is made up of three identical parts. But how does the number $3$ come up? I cannot see it in the definition of $mathbb{R}P^2$.



Boy surface










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    5












    $begingroup$



    In geometry, Boy's surface is an immersion of the real projective plane in 3-dimensional space found by Werner Boy in 1901




    My question is, you can see that the Boy surface is made up of three identical parts. But how does the number $3$ come up? I cannot see it in the definition of $mathbb{R}P^2$.



    Boy surface










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      5












      5








      5


      2



      $begingroup$



      In geometry, Boy's surface is an immersion of the real projective plane in 3-dimensional space found by Werner Boy in 1901




      My question is, you can see that the Boy surface is made up of three identical parts. But how does the number $3$ come up? I cannot see it in the definition of $mathbb{R}P^2$.



      Boy surface










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$





      In geometry, Boy's surface is an immersion of the real projective plane in 3-dimensional space found by Werner Boy in 1901




      My question is, you can see that the Boy surface is made up of three identical parts. But how does the number $3$ come up? I cannot see it in the definition of $mathbb{R}P^2$.



      Boy surface







      general-topology soft-question projective-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 12 at 9:54









      JiuJiu

      496113




      496113






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          There are probably many ways to answer this question, and I'm totally unqualified to do so but here is one thing: it is possible to construct versions of Boy's surface with 5-fold (and larger odd numbered) symmetry, (there are some lovely illustrations in Models of the Real Projective Plane: Computer Graphics of Steiner and Boy Surfaces
          - Francois Apery, you may have access to this at https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-3-322-89569-1%2F1.pdf)



          So the question could instead be why does the rotational symmetry of a Boy's type immersion have to be odd, it's probably something to do with the non-orientability of the surface.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! Many interesting pictures in the link. I have a hard time imagining what a mobius strip with circular boundary looks like.
            $endgroup$
            – Jiu
            Jan 12 at 12:23










          • $begingroup$
            first link is partly missing, looking forward to seeing it! (see my profile image)
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            Jan 12 at 14:30










          • $begingroup$
            @uhuh thanks, fixed!
            $endgroup$
            – Alex J Best
            Jan 12 at 16:34



















          2












          $begingroup$

          3 occurs in the usual definition of $RP^2$ as the set of lines in $R^3$. That is, the quotient space of $R^3-0$ that identifies $xsim cx$ for all nonzero $xin R^3$ and nonzero real $c$. The homeomorphism $(x_1,x_2,x_3)to(x_2,x_3,x_1)$
          for example induces a threefold symmetry of $RP^2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070745%2fwhy-does-the-real-projective-plane-boy-surface-look-like-this%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            There are probably many ways to answer this question, and I'm totally unqualified to do so but here is one thing: it is possible to construct versions of Boy's surface with 5-fold (and larger odd numbered) symmetry, (there are some lovely illustrations in Models of the Real Projective Plane: Computer Graphics of Steiner and Boy Surfaces
            - Francois Apery, you may have access to this at https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-3-322-89569-1%2F1.pdf)



            So the question could instead be why does the rotational symmetry of a Boy's type immersion have to be odd, it's probably something to do with the non-orientability of the surface.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thanks! Many interesting pictures in the link. I have a hard time imagining what a mobius strip with circular boundary looks like.
              $endgroup$
              – Jiu
              Jan 12 at 12:23










            • $begingroup$
              first link is partly missing, looking forward to seeing it! (see my profile image)
              $endgroup$
              – uhoh
              Jan 12 at 14:30










            • $begingroup$
              @uhuh thanks, fixed!
              $endgroup$
              – Alex J Best
              Jan 12 at 16:34
















            3












            $begingroup$

            There are probably many ways to answer this question, and I'm totally unqualified to do so but here is one thing: it is possible to construct versions of Boy's surface with 5-fold (and larger odd numbered) symmetry, (there are some lovely illustrations in Models of the Real Projective Plane: Computer Graphics of Steiner and Boy Surfaces
            - Francois Apery, you may have access to this at https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-3-322-89569-1%2F1.pdf)



            So the question could instead be why does the rotational symmetry of a Boy's type immersion have to be odd, it's probably something to do with the non-orientability of the surface.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thanks! Many interesting pictures in the link. I have a hard time imagining what a mobius strip with circular boundary looks like.
              $endgroup$
              – Jiu
              Jan 12 at 12:23










            • $begingroup$
              first link is partly missing, looking forward to seeing it! (see my profile image)
              $endgroup$
              – uhoh
              Jan 12 at 14:30










            • $begingroup$
              @uhuh thanks, fixed!
              $endgroup$
              – Alex J Best
              Jan 12 at 16:34














            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            There are probably many ways to answer this question, and I'm totally unqualified to do so but here is one thing: it is possible to construct versions of Boy's surface with 5-fold (and larger odd numbered) symmetry, (there are some lovely illustrations in Models of the Real Projective Plane: Computer Graphics of Steiner and Boy Surfaces
            - Francois Apery, you may have access to this at https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-3-322-89569-1%2F1.pdf)



            So the question could instead be why does the rotational symmetry of a Boy's type immersion have to be odd, it's probably something to do with the non-orientability of the surface.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            There are probably many ways to answer this question, and I'm totally unqualified to do so but here is one thing: it is possible to construct versions of Boy's surface with 5-fold (and larger odd numbered) symmetry, (there are some lovely illustrations in Models of the Real Projective Plane: Computer Graphics of Steiner and Boy Surfaces
            - Francois Apery, you may have access to this at https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-3-322-89569-1%2F1.pdf)



            So the question could instead be why does the rotational symmetry of a Boy's type immersion have to be odd, it's probably something to do with the non-orientability of the surface.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Jan 12 at 16:33

























            answered Jan 12 at 11:53









            Alex J BestAlex J Best

            2,12211225




            2,12211225












            • $begingroup$
              Thanks! Many interesting pictures in the link. I have a hard time imagining what a mobius strip with circular boundary looks like.
              $endgroup$
              – Jiu
              Jan 12 at 12:23










            • $begingroup$
              first link is partly missing, looking forward to seeing it! (see my profile image)
              $endgroup$
              – uhoh
              Jan 12 at 14:30










            • $begingroup$
              @uhuh thanks, fixed!
              $endgroup$
              – Alex J Best
              Jan 12 at 16:34


















            • $begingroup$
              Thanks! Many interesting pictures in the link. I have a hard time imagining what a mobius strip with circular boundary looks like.
              $endgroup$
              – Jiu
              Jan 12 at 12:23










            • $begingroup$
              first link is partly missing, looking forward to seeing it! (see my profile image)
              $endgroup$
              – uhoh
              Jan 12 at 14:30










            • $begingroup$
              @uhuh thanks, fixed!
              $endgroup$
              – Alex J Best
              Jan 12 at 16:34
















            $begingroup$
            Thanks! Many interesting pictures in the link. I have a hard time imagining what a mobius strip with circular boundary looks like.
            $endgroup$
            – Jiu
            Jan 12 at 12:23




            $begingroup$
            Thanks! Many interesting pictures in the link. I have a hard time imagining what a mobius strip with circular boundary looks like.
            $endgroup$
            – Jiu
            Jan 12 at 12:23












            $begingroup$
            first link is partly missing, looking forward to seeing it! (see my profile image)
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            Jan 12 at 14:30




            $begingroup$
            first link is partly missing, looking forward to seeing it! (see my profile image)
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            Jan 12 at 14:30












            $begingroup$
            @uhuh thanks, fixed!
            $endgroup$
            – Alex J Best
            Jan 12 at 16:34




            $begingroup$
            @uhuh thanks, fixed!
            $endgroup$
            – Alex J Best
            Jan 12 at 16:34











            2












            $begingroup$

            3 occurs in the usual definition of $RP^2$ as the set of lines in $R^3$. That is, the quotient space of $R^3-0$ that identifies $xsim cx$ for all nonzero $xin R^3$ and nonzero real $c$. The homeomorphism $(x_1,x_2,x_3)to(x_2,x_3,x_1)$
            for example induces a threefold symmetry of $RP^2$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              2












              $begingroup$

              3 occurs in the usual definition of $RP^2$ as the set of lines in $R^3$. That is, the quotient space of $R^3-0$ that identifies $xsim cx$ for all nonzero $xin R^3$ and nonzero real $c$. The homeomorphism $(x_1,x_2,x_3)to(x_2,x_3,x_1)$
              for example induces a threefold symmetry of $RP^2$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                3 occurs in the usual definition of $RP^2$ as the set of lines in $R^3$. That is, the quotient space of $R^3-0$ that identifies $xsim cx$ for all nonzero $xin R^3$ and nonzero real $c$. The homeomorphism $(x_1,x_2,x_3)to(x_2,x_3,x_1)$
                for example induces a threefold symmetry of $RP^2$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                3 occurs in the usual definition of $RP^2$ as the set of lines in $R^3$. That is, the quotient space of $R^3-0$ that identifies $xsim cx$ for all nonzero $xin R^3$ and nonzero real $c$. The homeomorphism $(x_1,x_2,x_3)to(x_2,x_3,x_1)$
                for example induces a threefold symmetry of $RP^2$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 12 at 12:27









                Bob TerrellBob Terrell

                1,705710




                1,705710






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070745%2fwhy-does-the-real-projective-plane-boy-surface-look-like-this%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Mario Kart Wii

                    The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

                    What does “Dominus providebit” mean?