Why does the real projective plane / Boy surface look like this?
$begingroup$
In geometry, Boy's surface is an immersion of the real projective plane in 3-dimensional space found by Werner Boy in 1901
My question is, you can see that the Boy surface is made up of three identical parts. But how does the number $3$ come up? I cannot see it in the definition of $mathbb{R}P^2$.
general-topology soft-question projective-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In geometry, Boy's surface is an immersion of the real projective plane in 3-dimensional space found by Werner Boy in 1901
My question is, you can see that the Boy surface is made up of three identical parts. But how does the number $3$ come up? I cannot see it in the definition of $mathbb{R}P^2$.
general-topology soft-question projective-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In geometry, Boy's surface is an immersion of the real projective plane in 3-dimensional space found by Werner Boy in 1901
My question is, you can see that the Boy surface is made up of three identical parts. But how does the number $3$ come up? I cannot see it in the definition of $mathbb{R}P^2$.
general-topology soft-question projective-geometry
$endgroup$
In geometry, Boy's surface is an immersion of the real projective plane in 3-dimensional space found by Werner Boy in 1901
My question is, you can see that the Boy surface is made up of three identical parts. But how does the number $3$ come up? I cannot see it in the definition of $mathbb{R}P^2$.
general-topology soft-question projective-geometry
general-topology soft-question projective-geometry
asked Jan 12 at 9:54
JiuJiu
496113
496113
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There are probably many ways to answer this question, and I'm totally unqualified to do so but here is one thing: it is possible to construct versions of Boy's surface with 5-fold (and larger odd numbered) symmetry, (there are some lovely illustrations in Models of the Real Projective Plane: Computer Graphics of Steiner and Boy Surfaces
- Francois Apery, you may have access to this at https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-3-322-89569-1%2F1.pdf)
So the question could instead be why does the rotational symmetry of a Boy's type immersion have to be odd, it's probably something to do with the non-orientability of the surface.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! Many interesting pictures in the link. I have a hard time imagining what a mobius strip with circular boundary looks like.
$endgroup$
– Jiu
Jan 12 at 12:23
$begingroup$
first link is partly missing, looking forward to seeing it! (see my profile image)
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jan 12 at 14:30
$begingroup$
@uhuh thanks, fixed!
$endgroup$
– Alex J Best
Jan 12 at 16:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
3 occurs in the usual definition of $RP^2$ as the set of lines in $R^3$. That is, the quotient space of $R^3-0$ that identifies $xsim cx$ for all nonzero $xin R^3$ and nonzero real $c$. The homeomorphism $(x_1,x_2,x_3)to(x_2,x_3,x_1)$
for example induces a threefold symmetry of $RP^2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070745%2fwhy-does-the-real-projective-plane-boy-surface-look-like-this%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There are probably many ways to answer this question, and I'm totally unqualified to do so but here is one thing: it is possible to construct versions of Boy's surface with 5-fold (and larger odd numbered) symmetry, (there are some lovely illustrations in Models of the Real Projective Plane: Computer Graphics of Steiner and Boy Surfaces
- Francois Apery, you may have access to this at https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-3-322-89569-1%2F1.pdf)
So the question could instead be why does the rotational symmetry of a Boy's type immersion have to be odd, it's probably something to do with the non-orientability of the surface.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! Many interesting pictures in the link. I have a hard time imagining what a mobius strip with circular boundary looks like.
$endgroup$
– Jiu
Jan 12 at 12:23
$begingroup$
first link is partly missing, looking forward to seeing it! (see my profile image)
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jan 12 at 14:30
$begingroup$
@uhuh thanks, fixed!
$endgroup$
– Alex J Best
Jan 12 at 16:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are probably many ways to answer this question, and I'm totally unqualified to do so but here is one thing: it is possible to construct versions of Boy's surface with 5-fold (and larger odd numbered) symmetry, (there are some lovely illustrations in Models of the Real Projective Plane: Computer Graphics of Steiner and Boy Surfaces
- Francois Apery, you may have access to this at https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-3-322-89569-1%2F1.pdf)
So the question could instead be why does the rotational symmetry of a Boy's type immersion have to be odd, it's probably something to do with the non-orientability of the surface.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! Many interesting pictures in the link. I have a hard time imagining what a mobius strip with circular boundary looks like.
$endgroup$
– Jiu
Jan 12 at 12:23
$begingroup$
first link is partly missing, looking forward to seeing it! (see my profile image)
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jan 12 at 14:30
$begingroup$
@uhuh thanks, fixed!
$endgroup$
– Alex J Best
Jan 12 at 16:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are probably many ways to answer this question, and I'm totally unqualified to do so but here is one thing: it is possible to construct versions of Boy's surface with 5-fold (and larger odd numbered) symmetry, (there are some lovely illustrations in Models of the Real Projective Plane: Computer Graphics of Steiner and Boy Surfaces
- Francois Apery, you may have access to this at https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-3-322-89569-1%2F1.pdf)
So the question could instead be why does the rotational symmetry of a Boy's type immersion have to be odd, it's probably something to do with the non-orientability of the surface.
$endgroup$
There are probably many ways to answer this question, and I'm totally unqualified to do so but here is one thing: it is possible to construct versions of Boy's surface with 5-fold (and larger odd numbered) symmetry, (there are some lovely illustrations in Models of the Real Projective Plane: Computer Graphics of Steiner and Boy Surfaces
- Francois Apery, you may have access to this at https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/bbm%3A978-3-322-89569-1%2F1.pdf)
So the question could instead be why does the rotational symmetry of a Boy's type immersion have to be odd, it's probably something to do with the non-orientability of the surface.
edited Jan 12 at 16:33
answered Jan 12 at 11:53
Alex J BestAlex J Best
2,12211225
2,12211225
$begingroup$
Thanks! Many interesting pictures in the link. I have a hard time imagining what a mobius strip with circular boundary looks like.
$endgroup$
– Jiu
Jan 12 at 12:23
$begingroup$
first link is partly missing, looking forward to seeing it! (see my profile image)
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jan 12 at 14:30
$begingroup$
@uhuh thanks, fixed!
$endgroup$
– Alex J Best
Jan 12 at 16:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks! Many interesting pictures in the link. I have a hard time imagining what a mobius strip with circular boundary looks like.
$endgroup$
– Jiu
Jan 12 at 12:23
$begingroup$
first link is partly missing, looking forward to seeing it! (see my profile image)
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jan 12 at 14:30
$begingroup$
@uhuh thanks, fixed!
$endgroup$
– Alex J Best
Jan 12 at 16:34
$begingroup$
Thanks! Many interesting pictures in the link. I have a hard time imagining what a mobius strip with circular boundary looks like.
$endgroup$
– Jiu
Jan 12 at 12:23
$begingroup$
Thanks! Many interesting pictures in the link. I have a hard time imagining what a mobius strip with circular boundary looks like.
$endgroup$
– Jiu
Jan 12 at 12:23
$begingroup$
first link is partly missing, looking forward to seeing it! (see my profile image)
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jan 12 at 14:30
$begingroup$
first link is partly missing, looking forward to seeing it! (see my profile image)
$endgroup$
– uhoh
Jan 12 at 14:30
$begingroup$
@uhuh thanks, fixed!
$endgroup$
– Alex J Best
Jan 12 at 16:34
$begingroup$
@uhuh thanks, fixed!
$endgroup$
– Alex J Best
Jan 12 at 16:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
3 occurs in the usual definition of $RP^2$ as the set of lines in $R^3$. That is, the quotient space of $R^3-0$ that identifies $xsim cx$ for all nonzero $xin R^3$ and nonzero real $c$. The homeomorphism $(x_1,x_2,x_3)to(x_2,x_3,x_1)$
for example induces a threefold symmetry of $RP^2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
3 occurs in the usual definition of $RP^2$ as the set of lines in $R^3$. That is, the quotient space of $R^3-0$ that identifies $xsim cx$ for all nonzero $xin R^3$ and nonzero real $c$. The homeomorphism $(x_1,x_2,x_3)to(x_2,x_3,x_1)$
for example induces a threefold symmetry of $RP^2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
3 occurs in the usual definition of $RP^2$ as the set of lines in $R^3$. That is, the quotient space of $R^3-0$ that identifies $xsim cx$ for all nonzero $xin R^3$ and nonzero real $c$. The homeomorphism $(x_1,x_2,x_3)to(x_2,x_3,x_1)$
for example induces a threefold symmetry of $RP^2$.
$endgroup$
3 occurs in the usual definition of $RP^2$ as the set of lines in $R^3$. That is, the quotient space of $R^3-0$ that identifies $xsim cx$ for all nonzero $xin R^3$ and nonzero real $c$. The homeomorphism $(x_1,x_2,x_3)to(x_2,x_3,x_1)$
for example induces a threefold symmetry of $RP^2$.
answered Jan 12 at 12:27
Bob TerrellBob Terrell
1,705710
1,705710
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070745%2fwhy-does-the-real-projective-plane-boy-surface-look-like-this%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown