Prove $Phi$ is a diffeomorphism












0














Let $d in mathbb N$.



Define $Phi:]0, infty[ times { x in mathbb R^{d-1}: |x|<1}to {y in mathbb R^d:y_{1}>0}, (r,x) mapsto r(sqrt{1-|x|^2},x)$



Show that $Phi$ is a diffeomorphism.



Ideas:



$1.$ Bijectivity:



$1.1$ Injectivity:
Let $x,y in mathbb R^d$ and $r,s in ]0, infty[$ whereby $x neq y$ or $r neq s$



if $x neq y$ is clear that $Phi(r,x)neq Phi(r,y)Rightarrow$ injectivity



So let $s neq r$ and $Phi(s,x)=s(sqrt{1-|x|^2},x) neqPhi(r,x)=r(sqrt{1-|x|^2},x) Rightarrow$ injectivity



$1.2$ Surjectivity: Let $z in {y in mathbb R^d:y_{1}>0}$ it is clear that there is an $r in ]0, infty[$ so that $r sqrt{1-|x|^2}=z_{1}Rightarrow$ surjectivity



$Rightarrow$ Bijectivity



On the issue of Differentiability of $Phi$ as well as Differentiability $Phi^{-1}$ I am lost, as this is the first time doing this...



Any ideas, corrections, tips?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Your injectivity proof does not work. You also have to consider $rneq s$ and $xneq y$ while $Phi(r,x)= Phi(s,y)$. For the differentability you can use the fact that a function is differentiable iff each coordinate is differentiable. An easy way to check differentiabilty of the inverse function is to use the inverse function theorem. Otherwise you have to find the inverse and check by hand that it is differentiable.
    – Severin Schraven
    10 hours ago










  • So $Phi$ is not injective?
    – SABOY
    9 hours ago










  • It is, but your proof is not complete.
    – Severin Schraven
    4 hours ago










  • Also your proof of surjectivity is not clear at all. If you change $r$, you also change the second coordinate.
    – Severin Schraven
    4 hours ago










  • On the issue of injectivity where $ r neq s$ and $x neq y$ do you mean we generate a contradiction after assuming $Phi(r,x) = Phi(s,y)$? Because assuming $r(sqrt{1-|x|^2},x)=s(sqrt{1-|y|^2},y)$ that would mean $r(sqrt{1-|x|^2})=s(sqrt{1-|y|^2})$ and that $rx_{i}=sy_{i}, forall i in {1,...,n}$. I have no idea how to generate a contradiction from this
    – SABOY
    3 hours ago
















0














Let $d in mathbb N$.



Define $Phi:]0, infty[ times { x in mathbb R^{d-1}: |x|<1}to {y in mathbb R^d:y_{1}>0}, (r,x) mapsto r(sqrt{1-|x|^2},x)$



Show that $Phi$ is a diffeomorphism.



Ideas:



$1.$ Bijectivity:



$1.1$ Injectivity:
Let $x,y in mathbb R^d$ and $r,s in ]0, infty[$ whereby $x neq y$ or $r neq s$



if $x neq y$ is clear that $Phi(r,x)neq Phi(r,y)Rightarrow$ injectivity



So let $s neq r$ and $Phi(s,x)=s(sqrt{1-|x|^2},x) neqPhi(r,x)=r(sqrt{1-|x|^2},x) Rightarrow$ injectivity



$1.2$ Surjectivity: Let $z in {y in mathbb R^d:y_{1}>0}$ it is clear that there is an $r in ]0, infty[$ so that $r sqrt{1-|x|^2}=z_{1}Rightarrow$ surjectivity



$Rightarrow$ Bijectivity



On the issue of Differentiability of $Phi$ as well as Differentiability $Phi^{-1}$ I am lost, as this is the first time doing this...



Any ideas, corrections, tips?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Your injectivity proof does not work. You also have to consider $rneq s$ and $xneq y$ while $Phi(r,x)= Phi(s,y)$. For the differentability you can use the fact that a function is differentiable iff each coordinate is differentiable. An easy way to check differentiabilty of the inverse function is to use the inverse function theorem. Otherwise you have to find the inverse and check by hand that it is differentiable.
    – Severin Schraven
    10 hours ago










  • So $Phi$ is not injective?
    – SABOY
    9 hours ago










  • It is, but your proof is not complete.
    – Severin Schraven
    4 hours ago










  • Also your proof of surjectivity is not clear at all. If you change $r$, you also change the second coordinate.
    – Severin Schraven
    4 hours ago










  • On the issue of injectivity where $ r neq s$ and $x neq y$ do you mean we generate a contradiction after assuming $Phi(r,x) = Phi(s,y)$? Because assuming $r(sqrt{1-|x|^2},x)=s(sqrt{1-|y|^2},y)$ that would mean $r(sqrt{1-|x|^2})=s(sqrt{1-|y|^2})$ and that $rx_{i}=sy_{i}, forall i in {1,...,n}$. I have no idea how to generate a contradiction from this
    – SABOY
    3 hours ago














0












0








0







Let $d in mathbb N$.



Define $Phi:]0, infty[ times { x in mathbb R^{d-1}: |x|<1}to {y in mathbb R^d:y_{1}>0}, (r,x) mapsto r(sqrt{1-|x|^2},x)$



Show that $Phi$ is a diffeomorphism.



Ideas:



$1.$ Bijectivity:



$1.1$ Injectivity:
Let $x,y in mathbb R^d$ and $r,s in ]0, infty[$ whereby $x neq y$ or $r neq s$



if $x neq y$ is clear that $Phi(r,x)neq Phi(r,y)Rightarrow$ injectivity



So let $s neq r$ and $Phi(s,x)=s(sqrt{1-|x|^2},x) neqPhi(r,x)=r(sqrt{1-|x|^2},x) Rightarrow$ injectivity



$1.2$ Surjectivity: Let $z in {y in mathbb R^d:y_{1}>0}$ it is clear that there is an $r in ]0, infty[$ so that $r sqrt{1-|x|^2}=z_{1}Rightarrow$ surjectivity



$Rightarrow$ Bijectivity



On the issue of Differentiability of $Phi$ as well as Differentiability $Phi^{-1}$ I am lost, as this is the first time doing this...



Any ideas, corrections, tips?










share|cite|improve this question













Let $d in mathbb N$.



Define $Phi:]0, infty[ times { x in mathbb R^{d-1}: |x|<1}to {y in mathbb R^d:y_{1}>0}, (r,x) mapsto r(sqrt{1-|x|^2},x)$



Show that $Phi$ is a diffeomorphism.



Ideas:



$1.$ Bijectivity:



$1.1$ Injectivity:
Let $x,y in mathbb R^d$ and $r,s in ]0, infty[$ whereby $x neq y$ or $r neq s$



if $x neq y$ is clear that $Phi(r,x)neq Phi(r,y)Rightarrow$ injectivity



So let $s neq r$ and $Phi(s,x)=s(sqrt{1-|x|^2},x) neqPhi(r,x)=r(sqrt{1-|x|^2},x) Rightarrow$ injectivity



$1.2$ Surjectivity: Let $z in {y in mathbb R^d:y_{1}>0}$ it is clear that there is an $r in ]0, infty[$ so that $r sqrt{1-|x|^2}=z_{1}Rightarrow$ surjectivity



$Rightarrow$ Bijectivity



On the issue of Differentiability of $Phi$ as well as Differentiability $Phi^{-1}$ I am lost, as this is the first time doing this...



Any ideas, corrections, tips?







real-analysis derivatives diffeomorphism






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 16 hours ago









SABOY

568311




568311












  • Your injectivity proof does not work. You also have to consider $rneq s$ and $xneq y$ while $Phi(r,x)= Phi(s,y)$. For the differentability you can use the fact that a function is differentiable iff each coordinate is differentiable. An easy way to check differentiabilty of the inverse function is to use the inverse function theorem. Otherwise you have to find the inverse and check by hand that it is differentiable.
    – Severin Schraven
    10 hours ago










  • So $Phi$ is not injective?
    – SABOY
    9 hours ago










  • It is, but your proof is not complete.
    – Severin Schraven
    4 hours ago










  • Also your proof of surjectivity is not clear at all. If you change $r$, you also change the second coordinate.
    – Severin Schraven
    4 hours ago










  • On the issue of injectivity where $ r neq s$ and $x neq y$ do you mean we generate a contradiction after assuming $Phi(r,x) = Phi(s,y)$? Because assuming $r(sqrt{1-|x|^2},x)=s(sqrt{1-|y|^2},y)$ that would mean $r(sqrt{1-|x|^2})=s(sqrt{1-|y|^2})$ and that $rx_{i}=sy_{i}, forall i in {1,...,n}$. I have no idea how to generate a contradiction from this
    – SABOY
    3 hours ago


















  • Your injectivity proof does not work. You also have to consider $rneq s$ and $xneq y$ while $Phi(r,x)= Phi(s,y)$. For the differentability you can use the fact that a function is differentiable iff each coordinate is differentiable. An easy way to check differentiabilty of the inverse function is to use the inverse function theorem. Otherwise you have to find the inverse and check by hand that it is differentiable.
    – Severin Schraven
    10 hours ago










  • So $Phi$ is not injective?
    – SABOY
    9 hours ago










  • It is, but your proof is not complete.
    – Severin Schraven
    4 hours ago










  • Also your proof of surjectivity is not clear at all. If you change $r$, you also change the second coordinate.
    – Severin Schraven
    4 hours ago










  • On the issue of injectivity where $ r neq s$ and $x neq y$ do you mean we generate a contradiction after assuming $Phi(r,x) = Phi(s,y)$? Because assuming $r(sqrt{1-|x|^2},x)=s(sqrt{1-|y|^2},y)$ that would mean $r(sqrt{1-|x|^2})=s(sqrt{1-|y|^2})$ and that $rx_{i}=sy_{i}, forall i in {1,...,n}$. I have no idea how to generate a contradiction from this
    – SABOY
    3 hours ago
















Your injectivity proof does not work. You also have to consider $rneq s$ and $xneq y$ while $Phi(r,x)= Phi(s,y)$. For the differentability you can use the fact that a function is differentiable iff each coordinate is differentiable. An easy way to check differentiabilty of the inverse function is to use the inverse function theorem. Otherwise you have to find the inverse and check by hand that it is differentiable.
– Severin Schraven
10 hours ago




Your injectivity proof does not work. You also have to consider $rneq s$ and $xneq y$ while $Phi(r,x)= Phi(s,y)$. For the differentability you can use the fact that a function is differentiable iff each coordinate is differentiable. An easy way to check differentiabilty of the inverse function is to use the inverse function theorem. Otherwise you have to find the inverse and check by hand that it is differentiable.
– Severin Schraven
10 hours ago












So $Phi$ is not injective?
– SABOY
9 hours ago




So $Phi$ is not injective?
– SABOY
9 hours ago












It is, but your proof is not complete.
– Severin Schraven
4 hours ago




It is, but your proof is not complete.
– Severin Schraven
4 hours ago












Also your proof of surjectivity is not clear at all. If you change $r$, you also change the second coordinate.
– Severin Schraven
4 hours ago




Also your proof of surjectivity is not clear at all. If you change $r$, you also change the second coordinate.
– Severin Schraven
4 hours ago












On the issue of injectivity where $ r neq s$ and $x neq y$ do you mean we generate a contradiction after assuming $Phi(r,x) = Phi(s,y)$? Because assuming $r(sqrt{1-|x|^2},x)=s(sqrt{1-|y|^2},y)$ that would mean $r(sqrt{1-|x|^2})=s(sqrt{1-|y|^2})$ and that $rx_{i}=sy_{i}, forall i in {1,...,n}$. I have no idea how to generate a contradiction from this
– SABOY
3 hours ago




On the issue of injectivity where $ r neq s$ and $x neq y$ do you mean we generate a contradiction after assuming $Phi(r,x) = Phi(s,y)$? Because assuming $r(sqrt{1-|x|^2},x)=s(sqrt{1-|y|^2},y)$ that would mean $r(sqrt{1-|x|^2})=s(sqrt{1-|y|^2})$ and that $rx_{i}=sy_{i}, forall i in {1,...,n}$. I have no idea how to generate a contradiction from this
– SABOY
3 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














Hint: The easiest way is to find the inverse function. For this we compute
$$ vert Phi(r,x) vert = r $$
as
$$ vert Phi(r,x) vert = vert r vert sqrt{(1-vert x vert^2)+ x_1^2 + dots + x_{d_1}^2} = vert r vert sqrt{1- vert x vert^2 + vert x vert^2} = vert r vert = r. $$
Hence, the inverse function is (for $y=(y_1, dots, y_d)$)
$$ Psi (y_1, dots, y_d) = left(vert y vert, frac{1}{vert y vert} y_2, dots, frac{1}{vert y vert} y_d right).$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061571%2fprove-phi-is-a-diffeomorphism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    Hint: The easiest way is to find the inverse function. For this we compute
    $$ vert Phi(r,x) vert = r $$
    as
    $$ vert Phi(r,x) vert = vert r vert sqrt{(1-vert x vert^2)+ x_1^2 + dots + x_{d_1}^2} = vert r vert sqrt{1- vert x vert^2 + vert x vert^2} = vert r vert = r. $$
    Hence, the inverse function is (for $y=(y_1, dots, y_d)$)
    $$ Psi (y_1, dots, y_d) = left(vert y vert, frac{1}{vert y vert} y_2, dots, frac{1}{vert y vert} y_d right).$$






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      0














      Hint: The easiest way is to find the inverse function. For this we compute
      $$ vert Phi(r,x) vert = r $$
      as
      $$ vert Phi(r,x) vert = vert r vert sqrt{(1-vert x vert^2)+ x_1^2 + dots + x_{d_1}^2} = vert r vert sqrt{1- vert x vert^2 + vert x vert^2} = vert r vert = r. $$
      Hence, the inverse function is (for $y=(y_1, dots, y_d)$)
      $$ Psi (y_1, dots, y_d) = left(vert y vert, frac{1}{vert y vert} y_2, dots, frac{1}{vert y vert} y_d right).$$






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        0












        0








        0






        Hint: The easiest way is to find the inverse function. For this we compute
        $$ vert Phi(r,x) vert = r $$
        as
        $$ vert Phi(r,x) vert = vert r vert sqrt{(1-vert x vert^2)+ x_1^2 + dots + x_{d_1}^2} = vert r vert sqrt{1- vert x vert^2 + vert x vert^2} = vert r vert = r. $$
        Hence, the inverse function is (for $y=(y_1, dots, y_d)$)
        $$ Psi (y_1, dots, y_d) = left(vert y vert, frac{1}{vert y vert} y_2, dots, frac{1}{vert y vert} y_d right).$$






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Hint: The easiest way is to find the inverse function. For this we compute
        $$ vert Phi(r,x) vert = r $$
        as
        $$ vert Phi(r,x) vert = vert r vert sqrt{(1-vert x vert^2)+ x_1^2 + dots + x_{d_1}^2} = vert r vert sqrt{1- vert x vert^2 + vert x vert^2} = vert r vert = r. $$
        Hence, the inverse function is (for $y=(y_1, dots, y_d)$)
        $$ Psi (y_1, dots, y_d) = left(vert y vert, frac{1}{vert y vert} y_2, dots, frac{1}{vert y vert} y_d right).$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 2 hours ago









        Severin Schraven

        5,8281934




        5,8281934






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061571%2fprove-phi-is-a-diffeomorphism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Mario Kart Wii

            The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

            What does “Dominus providebit” mean?