Froebenius norm is unitarily invariant.
I'm considering the norm defined on matrices by
$$|A|_F = sqrt{sum_{i,j}|a_{ij}|^2}$$
I want to show that it is unitarily invariant, so that for unitary $U$ we have that
$$|UA|_F = |A|_F = |AU|_F$$
however I have trouble doing it directly. Writing $|UA|_F$ directly I find by Cauchy-Schwarz that
$$|UA|_F = sqrt{sum_{i,j}left|sum_{k=1}^{n}u_{ik}a_{kj}right|^2}= sqrt{sum_{i,j}|langle U_i,overline{A_j}rangle|^2}leq sqrt{sum_{i,j}|A_j|^2}$$
where $U_i$ denotes the $i$th row of $U$ and $A_j$ the $j$th column of $A$. However this estimate is to crude and will not equal $|A|_F$. I would like to prove this without refering to trace or singular values and would appreciate a hint, rather than a full solution, on how to tackle this problem.
EDIT: Completion of the proof based on the answer from $A.Gamma$:
Since the rows of $U$ constitute an orthonormal basis for $mathbb{C}^n$ we find by Parsevals theorem that
$$|UA_j|_2^2 = sum_{i=1}^{n}left|sum_{k=1}^{n}u_{ik}a_{kj}right|^2 = sum_{i=1}^{n}|langle U_i,overline{A_j}rangle|^2 = |overline{A_j}|_2^2 = |A_j|_2^2$$
linear-algebra matrices norm
add a comment |
I'm considering the norm defined on matrices by
$$|A|_F = sqrt{sum_{i,j}|a_{ij}|^2}$$
I want to show that it is unitarily invariant, so that for unitary $U$ we have that
$$|UA|_F = |A|_F = |AU|_F$$
however I have trouble doing it directly. Writing $|UA|_F$ directly I find by Cauchy-Schwarz that
$$|UA|_F = sqrt{sum_{i,j}left|sum_{k=1}^{n}u_{ik}a_{kj}right|^2}= sqrt{sum_{i,j}|langle U_i,overline{A_j}rangle|^2}leq sqrt{sum_{i,j}|A_j|^2}$$
where $U_i$ denotes the $i$th row of $U$ and $A_j$ the $j$th column of $A$. However this estimate is to crude and will not equal $|A|_F$. I would like to prove this without refering to trace or singular values and would appreciate a hint, rather than a full solution, on how to tackle this problem.
EDIT: Completion of the proof based on the answer from $A.Gamma$:
Since the rows of $U$ constitute an orthonormal basis for $mathbb{C}^n$ we find by Parsevals theorem that
$$|UA_j|_2^2 = sum_{i=1}^{n}left|sum_{k=1}^{n}u_{ik}a_{kj}right|^2 = sum_{i=1}^{n}|langle U_i,overline{A_j}rangle|^2 = |overline{A_j}|_2^2 = |A_j|_2^2$$
linear-algebra matrices norm
add a comment |
I'm considering the norm defined on matrices by
$$|A|_F = sqrt{sum_{i,j}|a_{ij}|^2}$$
I want to show that it is unitarily invariant, so that for unitary $U$ we have that
$$|UA|_F = |A|_F = |AU|_F$$
however I have trouble doing it directly. Writing $|UA|_F$ directly I find by Cauchy-Schwarz that
$$|UA|_F = sqrt{sum_{i,j}left|sum_{k=1}^{n}u_{ik}a_{kj}right|^2}= sqrt{sum_{i,j}|langle U_i,overline{A_j}rangle|^2}leq sqrt{sum_{i,j}|A_j|^2}$$
where $U_i$ denotes the $i$th row of $U$ and $A_j$ the $j$th column of $A$. However this estimate is to crude and will not equal $|A|_F$. I would like to prove this without refering to trace or singular values and would appreciate a hint, rather than a full solution, on how to tackle this problem.
EDIT: Completion of the proof based on the answer from $A.Gamma$:
Since the rows of $U$ constitute an orthonormal basis for $mathbb{C}^n$ we find by Parsevals theorem that
$$|UA_j|_2^2 = sum_{i=1}^{n}left|sum_{k=1}^{n}u_{ik}a_{kj}right|^2 = sum_{i=1}^{n}|langle U_i,overline{A_j}rangle|^2 = |overline{A_j}|_2^2 = |A_j|_2^2$$
linear-algebra matrices norm
I'm considering the norm defined on matrices by
$$|A|_F = sqrt{sum_{i,j}|a_{ij}|^2}$$
I want to show that it is unitarily invariant, so that for unitary $U$ we have that
$$|UA|_F = |A|_F = |AU|_F$$
however I have trouble doing it directly. Writing $|UA|_F$ directly I find by Cauchy-Schwarz that
$$|UA|_F = sqrt{sum_{i,j}left|sum_{k=1}^{n}u_{ik}a_{kj}right|^2}= sqrt{sum_{i,j}|langle U_i,overline{A_j}rangle|^2}leq sqrt{sum_{i,j}|A_j|^2}$$
where $U_i$ denotes the $i$th row of $U$ and $A_j$ the $j$th column of $A$. However this estimate is to crude and will not equal $|A|_F$. I would like to prove this without refering to trace or singular values and would appreciate a hint, rather than a full solution, on how to tackle this problem.
EDIT: Completion of the proof based on the answer from $A.Gamma$:
Since the rows of $U$ constitute an orthonormal basis for $mathbb{C}^n$ we find by Parsevals theorem that
$$|UA_j|_2^2 = sum_{i=1}^{n}left|sum_{k=1}^{n}u_{ik}a_{kj}right|^2 = sum_{i=1}^{n}|langle U_i,overline{A_j}rangle|^2 = |overline{A_j}|_2^2 = |A_j|_2^2$$
linear-algebra matrices norm
linear-algebra matrices norm
edited 15 hours ago
asked 16 hours ago
Olof Rubin
1,080315
1,080315
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Since
$$
UA=[UA_1 UA_2 ldots UA_n]
$$
you need to prove that
$$
|UA|_F^2=sum_{j=1}^n|UA_j|_2^2stackrel{?}{=}sum_{j=1}^n|A_j|_2^2=|A|_F^2.
$$
It suffice to prove that $|UA_j|_2^2=|A_j|_2^2$.
P.S. For $AU$ use conjugation.
I see we can use that the rows of $U$ constitute an ONB for $mathbb{C}^n$, I completed my proof above using your recommendation. Thank you. I realise now that part of my confusion came from the fact that unitary matrices don't need to have norm $1$.
– Olof Rubin
15 hours ago
1
@OlofRubin Alternatively, one can use that a unitary matrix is isometric, i.e. $|Ux|_2=|x|_2$. Proof: $$|Ux|_2^2=(Ux)^*Ux=x^*underbrace{U^*U}_{=I}x=x^*x=|x|_2^2.$$
– A.Γ.
15 hours ago
Ah yes that is more direct.
– Olof Rubin
14 hours ago
add a comment |
Quick and dirty:
$$|UA|_F^2 = operatorname{Tr}((UA)^*(UA)) = operatorname{Tr}(A^*U^*UA) = operatorname{Tr}(A^*A) = |A|_F^2$$
and then since $U^*$ is also unitary
$$|AU|_F^2 = |(U^*A^*)^*|_F^2 = |U^*A^*|_F^2 = |A^*|_F^2 = |A|_F^2$$
Alternative argument:
Note that $A^*A ge 0$ so there exists an orthonormal basis ${u_1, ldots, u_n}$ for $mathbb{C}^n$ such that $A^*A u_i = lambda_i u_i$ for some $lambda ge 0$.
We have
$$sum_{i=1}^n |Au_i|_2^2 = sum_{i=1}^n langle Au_i, Au_irangle = sum_{i=1}^n langle A^*Au_i, u_irangle = sum_{i=1}^n lambda_i =operatorname{Tr}(A^*A) = |A|_F^2$$
because the trace is the sum of eigenvalues.
The interesting part is that the sum $sum_{i=1}^n |Au_i|_2^2$ is actually independent of the choice of the orthonormal basis ${u_1, ldots, u_n}$. Indeed, if ${v_1, ldots, v_n}$ is some other orthonormal basis for $mathbb{C}^n$, we have
begin{align}
sum_{i=1}^n |Au_i|_2^2 &= sum_{i=1}^n langle A^*Au_i, u_irangle\
&= sum_{i=1}^n leftlangle sum_{j=1}^nlangle u_i,v_jrangle A^*A v_j , sum_{k=1}^nlangle u_i,v_krangle v_krightrangle\
&= sum_{j=1}^n sum_{k=1}^n left(sum_{i=1}^nlangle u_i,v_jrangle langle v_k,u_irangleright)langle A^*A v_j,v_krangle\
&= sum_{j=1}^n sum_{k=1}^n langle v_j,v_kranglelangle A^*A v_j,v_krangle\
&= sum_{j=1}^n langle A^*A v_j,v_jrangle\
&= sum_{j=1}^n |Av_j|_2^2
end{align}
Now, if $U$ is unitary, for any orthonormal basis ${u_1, ldots, u_n}$ we have that ${Uu_1, ldots, Uu_n}$ is also an orthonormal basis so:
$$|AU|_F^2 = sum_{i=1}^n |A(Ue_i)|^2 = |A|_F^2$$
That's true, but the OP doesn't want to refer to trace.
– A.Γ.
15 hours ago
@A.Γ. True, I missed that. Your argument is great. I have added an alternative argument which may be helpful, but it still uses the trace.
– mechanodroid
15 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061577%2ffroebenius-norm-is-unitarily-invariant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Since
$$
UA=[UA_1 UA_2 ldots UA_n]
$$
you need to prove that
$$
|UA|_F^2=sum_{j=1}^n|UA_j|_2^2stackrel{?}{=}sum_{j=1}^n|A_j|_2^2=|A|_F^2.
$$
It suffice to prove that $|UA_j|_2^2=|A_j|_2^2$.
P.S. For $AU$ use conjugation.
I see we can use that the rows of $U$ constitute an ONB for $mathbb{C}^n$, I completed my proof above using your recommendation. Thank you. I realise now that part of my confusion came from the fact that unitary matrices don't need to have norm $1$.
– Olof Rubin
15 hours ago
1
@OlofRubin Alternatively, one can use that a unitary matrix is isometric, i.e. $|Ux|_2=|x|_2$. Proof: $$|Ux|_2^2=(Ux)^*Ux=x^*underbrace{U^*U}_{=I}x=x^*x=|x|_2^2.$$
– A.Γ.
15 hours ago
Ah yes that is more direct.
– Olof Rubin
14 hours ago
add a comment |
Since
$$
UA=[UA_1 UA_2 ldots UA_n]
$$
you need to prove that
$$
|UA|_F^2=sum_{j=1}^n|UA_j|_2^2stackrel{?}{=}sum_{j=1}^n|A_j|_2^2=|A|_F^2.
$$
It suffice to prove that $|UA_j|_2^2=|A_j|_2^2$.
P.S. For $AU$ use conjugation.
I see we can use that the rows of $U$ constitute an ONB for $mathbb{C}^n$, I completed my proof above using your recommendation. Thank you. I realise now that part of my confusion came from the fact that unitary matrices don't need to have norm $1$.
– Olof Rubin
15 hours ago
1
@OlofRubin Alternatively, one can use that a unitary matrix is isometric, i.e. $|Ux|_2=|x|_2$. Proof: $$|Ux|_2^2=(Ux)^*Ux=x^*underbrace{U^*U}_{=I}x=x^*x=|x|_2^2.$$
– A.Γ.
15 hours ago
Ah yes that is more direct.
– Olof Rubin
14 hours ago
add a comment |
Since
$$
UA=[UA_1 UA_2 ldots UA_n]
$$
you need to prove that
$$
|UA|_F^2=sum_{j=1}^n|UA_j|_2^2stackrel{?}{=}sum_{j=1}^n|A_j|_2^2=|A|_F^2.
$$
It suffice to prove that $|UA_j|_2^2=|A_j|_2^2$.
P.S. For $AU$ use conjugation.
Since
$$
UA=[UA_1 UA_2 ldots UA_n]
$$
you need to prove that
$$
|UA|_F^2=sum_{j=1}^n|UA_j|_2^2stackrel{?}{=}sum_{j=1}^n|A_j|_2^2=|A|_F^2.
$$
It suffice to prove that $|UA_j|_2^2=|A_j|_2^2$.
P.S. For $AU$ use conjugation.
answered 16 hours ago
A.Γ.
22.5k32656
22.5k32656
I see we can use that the rows of $U$ constitute an ONB for $mathbb{C}^n$, I completed my proof above using your recommendation. Thank you. I realise now that part of my confusion came from the fact that unitary matrices don't need to have norm $1$.
– Olof Rubin
15 hours ago
1
@OlofRubin Alternatively, one can use that a unitary matrix is isometric, i.e. $|Ux|_2=|x|_2$. Proof: $$|Ux|_2^2=(Ux)^*Ux=x^*underbrace{U^*U}_{=I}x=x^*x=|x|_2^2.$$
– A.Γ.
15 hours ago
Ah yes that is more direct.
– Olof Rubin
14 hours ago
add a comment |
I see we can use that the rows of $U$ constitute an ONB for $mathbb{C}^n$, I completed my proof above using your recommendation. Thank you. I realise now that part of my confusion came from the fact that unitary matrices don't need to have norm $1$.
– Olof Rubin
15 hours ago
1
@OlofRubin Alternatively, one can use that a unitary matrix is isometric, i.e. $|Ux|_2=|x|_2$. Proof: $$|Ux|_2^2=(Ux)^*Ux=x^*underbrace{U^*U}_{=I}x=x^*x=|x|_2^2.$$
– A.Γ.
15 hours ago
Ah yes that is more direct.
– Olof Rubin
14 hours ago
I see we can use that the rows of $U$ constitute an ONB for $mathbb{C}^n$, I completed my proof above using your recommendation. Thank you. I realise now that part of my confusion came from the fact that unitary matrices don't need to have norm $1$.
– Olof Rubin
15 hours ago
I see we can use that the rows of $U$ constitute an ONB for $mathbb{C}^n$, I completed my proof above using your recommendation. Thank you. I realise now that part of my confusion came from the fact that unitary matrices don't need to have norm $1$.
– Olof Rubin
15 hours ago
1
1
@OlofRubin Alternatively, one can use that a unitary matrix is isometric, i.e. $|Ux|_2=|x|_2$. Proof: $$|Ux|_2^2=(Ux)^*Ux=x^*underbrace{U^*U}_{=I}x=x^*x=|x|_2^2.$$
– A.Γ.
15 hours ago
@OlofRubin Alternatively, one can use that a unitary matrix is isometric, i.e. $|Ux|_2=|x|_2$. Proof: $$|Ux|_2^2=(Ux)^*Ux=x^*underbrace{U^*U}_{=I}x=x^*x=|x|_2^2.$$
– A.Γ.
15 hours ago
Ah yes that is more direct.
– Olof Rubin
14 hours ago
Ah yes that is more direct.
– Olof Rubin
14 hours ago
add a comment |
Quick and dirty:
$$|UA|_F^2 = operatorname{Tr}((UA)^*(UA)) = operatorname{Tr}(A^*U^*UA) = operatorname{Tr}(A^*A) = |A|_F^2$$
and then since $U^*$ is also unitary
$$|AU|_F^2 = |(U^*A^*)^*|_F^2 = |U^*A^*|_F^2 = |A^*|_F^2 = |A|_F^2$$
Alternative argument:
Note that $A^*A ge 0$ so there exists an orthonormal basis ${u_1, ldots, u_n}$ for $mathbb{C}^n$ such that $A^*A u_i = lambda_i u_i$ for some $lambda ge 0$.
We have
$$sum_{i=1}^n |Au_i|_2^2 = sum_{i=1}^n langle Au_i, Au_irangle = sum_{i=1}^n langle A^*Au_i, u_irangle = sum_{i=1}^n lambda_i =operatorname{Tr}(A^*A) = |A|_F^2$$
because the trace is the sum of eigenvalues.
The interesting part is that the sum $sum_{i=1}^n |Au_i|_2^2$ is actually independent of the choice of the orthonormal basis ${u_1, ldots, u_n}$. Indeed, if ${v_1, ldots, v_n}$ is some other orthonormal basis for $mathbb{C}^n$, we have
begin{align}
sum_{i=1}^n |Au_i|_2^2 &= sum_{i=1}^n langle A^*Au_i, u_irangle\
&= sum_{i=1}^n leftlangle sum_{j=1}^nlangle u_i,v_jrangle A^*A v_j , sum_{k=1}^nlangle u_i,v_krangle v_krightrangle\
&= sum_{j=1}^n sum_{k=1}^n left(sum_{i=1}^nlangle u_i,v_jrangle langle v_k,u_irangleright)langle A^*A v_j,v_krangle\
&= sum_{j=1}^n sum_{k=1}^n langle v_j,v_kranglelangle A^*A v_j,v_krangle\
&= sum_{j=1}^n langle A^*A v_j,v_jrangle\
&= sum_{j=1}^n |Av_j|_2^2
end{align}
Now, if $U$ is unitary, for any orthonormal basis ${u_1, ldots, u_n}$ we have that ${Uu_1, ldots, Uu_n}$ is also an orthonormal basis so:
$$|AU|_F^2 = sum_{i=1}^n |A(Ue_i)|^2 = |A|_F^2$$
That's true, but the OP doesn't want to refer to trace.
– A.Γ.
15 hours ago
@A.Γ. True, I missed that. Your argument is great. I have added an alternative argument which may be helpful, but it still uses the trace.
– mechanodroid
15 hours ago
add a comment |
Quick and dirty:
$$|UA|_F^2 = operatorname{Tr}((UA)^*(UA)) = operatorname{Tr}(A^*U^*UA) = operatorname{Tr}(A^*A) = |A|_F^2$$
and then since $U^*$ is also unitary
$$|AU|_F^2 = |(U^*A^*)^*|_F^2 = |U^*A^*|_F^2 = |A^*|_F^2 = |A|_F^2$$
Alternative argument:
Note that $A^*A ge 0$ so there exists an orthonormal basis ${u_1, ldots, u_n}$ for $mathbb{C}^n$ such that $A^*A u_i = lambda_i u_i$ for some $lambda ge 0$.
We have
$$sum_{i=1}^n |Au_i|_2^2 = sum_{i=1}^n langle Au_i, Au_irangle = sum_{i=1}^n langle A^*Au_i, u_irangle = sum_{i=1}^n lambda_i =operatorname{Tr}(A^*A) = |A|_F^2$$
because the trace is the sum of eigenvalues.
The interesting part is that the sum $sum_{i=1}^n |Au_i|_2^2$ is actually independent of the choice of the orthonormal basis ${u_1, ldots, u_n}$. Indeed, if ${v_1, ldots, v_n}$ is some other orthonormal basis for $mathbb{C}^n$, we have
begin{align}
sum_{i=1}^n |Au_i|_2^2 &= sum_{i=1}^n langle A^*Au_i, u_irangle\
&= sum_{i=1}^n leftlangle sum_{j=1}^nlangle u_i,v_jrangle A^*A v_j , sum_{k=1}^nlangle u_i,v_krangle v_krightrangle\
&= sum_{j=1}^n sum_{k=1}^n left(sum_{i=1}^nlangle u_i,v_jrangle langle v_k,u_irangleright)langle A^*A v_j,v_krangle\
&= sum_{j=1}^n sum_{k=1}^n langle v_j,v_kranglelangle A^*A v_j,v_krangle\
&= sum_{j=1}^n langle A^*A v_j,v_jrangle\
&= sum_{j=1}^n |Av_j|_2^2
end{align}
Now, if $U$ is unitary, for any orthonormal basis ${u_1, ldots, u_n}$ we have that ${Uu_1, ldots, Uu_n}$ is also an orthonormal basis so:
$$|AU|_F^2 = sum_{i=1}^n |A(Ue_i)|^2 = |A|_F^2$$
That's true, but the OP doesn't want to refer to trace.
– A.Γ.
15 hours ago
@A.Γ. True, I missed that. Your argument is great. I have added an alternative argument which may be helpful, but it still uses the trace.
– mechanodroid
15 hours ago
add a comment |
Quick and dirty:
$$|UA|_F^2 = operatorname{Tr}((UA)^*(UA)) = operatorname{Tr}(A^*U^*UA) = operatorname{Tr}(A^*A) = |A|_F^2$$
and then since $U^*$ is also unitary
$$|AU|_F^2 = |(U^*A^*)^*|_F^2 = |U^*A^*|_F^2 = |A^*|_F^2 = |A|_F^2$$
Alternative argument:
Note that $A^*A ge 0$ so there exists an orthonormal basis ${u_1, ldots, u_n}$ for $mathbb{C}^n$ such that $A^*A u_i = lambda_i u_i$ for some $lambda ge 0$.
We have
$$sum_{i=1}^n |Au_i|_2^2 = sum_{i=1}^n langle Au_i, Au_irangle = sum_{i=1}^n langle A^*Au_i, u_irangle = sum_{i=1}^n lambda_i =operatorname{Tr}(A^*A) = |A|_F^2$$
because the trace is the sum of eigenvalues.
The interesting part is that the sum $sum_{i=1}^n |Au_i|_2^2$ is actually independent of the choice of the orthonormal basis ${u_1, ldots, u_n}$. Indeed, if ${v_1, ldots, v_n}$ is some other orthonormal basis for $mathbb{C}^n$, we have
begin{align}
sum_{i=1}^n |Au_i|_2^2 &= sum_{i=1}^n langle A^*Au_i, u_irangle\
&= sum_{i=1}^n leftlangle sum_{j=1}^nlangle u_i,v_jrangle A^*A v_j , sum_{k=1}^nlangle u_i,v_krangle v_krightrangle\
&= sum_{j=1}^n sum_{k=1}^n left(sum_{i=1}^nlangle u_i,v_jrangle langle v_k,u_irangleright)langle A^*A v_j,v_krangle\
&= sum_{j=1}^n sum_{k=1}^n langle v_j,v_kranglelangle A^*A v_j,v_krangle\
&= sum_{j=1}^n langle A^*A v_j,v_jrangle\
&= sum_{j=1}^n |Av_j|_2^2
end{align}
Now, if $U$ is unitary, for any orthonormal basis ${u_1, ldots, u_n}$ we have that ${Uu_1, ldots, Uu_n}$ is also an orthonormal basis so:
$$|AU|_F^2 = sum_{i=1}^n |A(Ue_i)|^2 = |A|_F^2$$
Quick and dirty:
$$|UA|_F^2 = operatorname{Tr}((UA)^*(UA)) = operatorname{Tr}(A^*U^*UA) = operatorname{Tr}(A^*A) = |A|_F^2$$
and then since $U^*$ is also unitary
$$|AU|_F^2 = |(U^*A^*)^*|_F^2 = |U^*A^*|_F^2 = |A^*|_F^2 = |A|_F^2$$
Alternative argument:
Note that $A^*A ge 0$ so there exists an orthonormal basis ${u_1, ldots, u_n}$ for $mathbb{C}^n$ such that $A^*A u_i = lambda_i u_i$ for some $lambda ge 0$.
We have
$$sum_{i=1}^n |Au_i|_2^2 = sum_{i=1}^n langle Au_i, Au_irangle = sum_{i=1}^n langle A^*Au_i, u_irangle = sum_{i=1}^n lambda_i =operatorname{Tr}(A^*A) = |A|_F^2$$
because the trace is the sum of eigenvalues.
The interesting part is that the sum $sum_{i=1}^n |Au_i|_2^2$ is actually independent of the choice of the orthonormal basis ${u_1, ldots, u_n}$. Indeed, if ${v_1, ldots, v_n}$ is some other orthonormal basis for $mathbb{C}^n$, we have
begin{align}
sum_{i=1}^n |Au_i|_2^2 &= sum_{i=1}^n langle A^*Au_i, u_irangle\
&= sum_{i=1}^n leftlangle sum_{j=1}^nlangle u_i,v_jrangle A^*A v_j , sum_{k=1}^nlangle u_i,v_krangle v_krightrangle\
&= sum_{j=1}^n sum_{k=1}^n left(sum_{i=1}^nlangle u_i,v_jrangle langle v_k,u_irangleright)langle A^*A v_j,v_krangle\
&= sum_{j=1}^n sum_{k=1}^n langle v_j,v_kranglelangle A^*A v_j,v_krangle\
&= sum_{j=1}^n langle A^*A v_j,v_jrangle\
&= sum_{j=1}^n |Av_j|_2^2
end{align}
Now, if $U$ is unitary, for any orthonormal basis ${u_1, ldots, u_n}$ we have that ${Uu_1, ldots, Uu_n}$ is also an orthonormal basis so:
$$|AU|_F^2 = sum_{i=1}^n |A(Ue_i)|^2 = |A|_F^2$$
edited 15 hours ago
answered 15 hours ago
mechanodroid
26.8k62347
26.8k62347
That's true, but the OP doesn't want to refer to trace.
– A.Γ.
15 hours ago
@A.Γ. True, I missed that. Your argument is great. I have added an alternative argument which may be helpful, but it still uses the trace.
– mechanodroid
15 hours ago
add a comment |
That's true, but the OP doesn't want to refer to trace.
– A.Γ.
15 hours ago
@A.Γ. True, I missed that. Your argument is great. I have added an alternative argument which may be helpful, but it still uses the trace.
– mechanodroid
15 hours ago
That's true, but the OP doesn't want to refer to trace.
– A.Γ.
15 hours ago
That's true, but the OP doesn't want to refer to trace.
– A.Γ.
15 hours ago
@A.Γ. True, I missed that. Your argument is great. I have added an alternative argument which may be helpful, but it still uses the trace.
– mechanodroid
15 hours ago
@A.Γ. True, I missed that. Your argument is great. I have added an alternative argument which may be helpful, but it still uses the trace.
– mechanodroid
15 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061577%2ffroebenius-norm-is-unitarily-invariant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown