Evaluate definite integral with variable limits [on hold]

Multi tool use
Consider the function $f: (0, infty) to R $
$$ f(x)= begin{cases}
int_{x}^{x^2} frac{dt}{log(t)} & xneq 1 \
l & x=1 \
end{cases}
$$
Determine $l$ such that the function $f$ should be continuous at 1. For the determined value of $l$, is the function differentiable?
I started out by trying to calculate the following limit, however, I had trouble continuing.
$$lim_{xto1}int_{x}^{x^2}frac{mathrm dt}{log(t)}$$
Thank you!
real-analysis calculus integration definite-integrals
New contributor
Deniz Atalar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
put on hold as off-topic by amWhy, RRL, Abcd, jgon, rtybase 9 hours ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – amWhy, RRL, Abcd, jgon, rtybase
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
Consider the function $f: (0, infty) to R $
$$ f(x)= begin{cases}
int_{x}^{x^2} frac{dt}{log(t)} & xneq 1 \
l & x=1 \
end{cases}
$$
Determine $l$ such that the function $f$ should be continuous at 1. For the determined value of $l$, is the function differentiable?
I started out by trying to calculate the following limit, however, I had trouble continuing.
$$lim_{xto1}int_{x}^{x^2}frac{mathrm dt}{log(t)}$$
Thank you!
real-analysis calculus integration definite-integrals
New contributor
Deniz Atalar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
put on hold as off-topic by amWhy, RRL, Abcd, jgon, rtybase 9 hours ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – amWhy, RRL, Abcd, jgon, rtybase
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
Your integral itself is a very special integral called the Logarithmic Integral. If you were to evaluate the given integral, you would get $ lim_{x to 1 } (Gamma{(0, -ln x)} - Gamma{(0, -2 ln x)} )$
– Tusky
16 hours ago
The3 result should be $$ln(2)$$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
16 hours ago
add a comment |
Consider the function $f: (0, infty) to R $
$$ f(x)= begin{cases}
int_{x}^{x^2} frac{dt}{log(t)} & xneq 1 \
l & x=1 \
end{cases}
$$
Determine $l$ such that the function $f$ should be continuous at 1. For the determined value of $l$, is the function differentiable?
I started out by trying to calculate the following limit, however, I had trouble continuing.
$$lim_{xto1}int_{x}^{x^2}frac{mathrm dt}{log(t)}$$
Thank you!
real-analysis calculus integration definite-integrals
New contributor
Deniz Atalar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Consider the function $f: (0, infty) to R $
$$ f(x)= begin{cases}
int_{x}^{x^2} frac{dt}{log(t)} & xneq 1 \
l & x=1 \
end{cases}
$$
Determine $l$ such that the function $f$ should be continuous at 1. For the determined value of $l$, is the function differentiable?
I started out by trying to calculate the following limit, however, I had trouble continuing.
$$lim_{xto1}int_{x}^{x^2}frac{mathrm dt}{log(t)}$$
Thank you!
real-analysis calculus integration definite-integrals
real-analysis calculus integration definite-integrals
New contributor
Deniz Atalar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Deniz Atalar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 16 hours ago
New contributor
Deniz Atalar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 17 hours ago


Deniz Atalar
92
92
New contributor
Deniz Atalar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Deniz Atalar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Deniz Atalar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
put on hold as off-topic by amWhy, RRL, Abcd, jgon, rtybase 9 hours ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – amWhy, RRL, Abcd, jgon, rtybase
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by amWhy, RRL, Abcd, jgon, rtybase 9 hours ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – amWhy, RRL, Abcd, jgon, rtybase
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
Your integral itself is a very special integral called the Logarithmic Integral. If you were to evaluate the given integral, you would get $ lim_{x to 1 } (Gamma{(0, -ln x)} - Gamma{(0, -2 ln x)} )$
– Tusky
16 hours ago
The3 result should be $$ln(2)$$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
16 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Your integral itself is a very special integral called the Logarithmic Integral. If you were to evaluate the given integral, you would get $ lim_{x to 1 } (Gamma{(0, -ln x)} - Gamma{(0, -2 ln x)} )$
– Tusky
16 hours ago
The3 result should be $$ln(2)$$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
16 hours ago
1
1
Your integral itself is a very special integral called the Logarithmic Integral. If you were to evaluate the given integral, you would get $ lim_{x to 1 } (Gamma{(0, -ln x)} - Gamma{(0, -2 ln x)} )$
– Tusky
16 hours ago
Your integral itself is a very special integral called the Logarithmic Integral. If you were to evaluate the given integral, you would get $ lim_{x to 1 } (Gamma{(0, -ln x)} - Gamma{(0, -2 ln x)} )$
– Tusky
16 hours ago
The3 result should be $$ln(2)$$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
16 hours ago
The3 result should be $$ln(2)$$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
16 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
To calculate the limit itself (and not address the differentiability question)...
Below, consider $x>1$ as fixed, and make (as Tommaso does) the substitution $t = e^s$. Then
$$f(x) = int_x^{x^2} {dt over ln t} = int_{ln x}^{2ln x} {e^sover s}, ds.$$
Make the substitution $s = u ln x$:
$$ f(x) = int^2_1 e^{uln x} {duover u}.$$
As $xdownarrow 1$, we see that
$$ f(x) to int^2_1{duover u}= ln 2.$$
(Bringing the limit inside the integral is valid - by dominated convergence, for instance.)
Addendum/Edit:
1) The same argument works starting with $0<x<1$, and taking $xuparrow 1$.
2) If one sets $f(1) = ln 2$, one has that
$$ f(x) = int^2_1 e^{u ln x} {duover u}$$
identically, for $xin (0,infty)$. So, on condition that you can show that to calculate limits, one can perform the same corresponding calculations on the integrand, you can show that $f$ is differentiable.
add a comment |
First change variables $t = e^s$ and get
$$ int_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} e^s s^{-1}ds. $$
Now expand the exponential around zero $e^s = sum_{ngeq 0} s^n/n!$ and pass the series outside the integral as $s^{-1} s^n/n! |_{(ln(x),ln(x^2)}$ converges uniformly to $0$. Pay attention to the first term, as $s^0/0!equiv 1$
begin{align*} int_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} (1 + sum_{ngeq 1}s^n/n!) s^{-1}ds &= left. ln(s) + sum_{ngeq 1} s^n/(n!n) right|_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} \
& = ln(ln(x^2)/ln(x)) + sum_{ngeq 1} (2^n-1)ln(x)^n/(n!n).
end{align*}
The term on the right goes to zero as $xto 0$ because the series converges absolutely in a right neighborhood of $1$. Therefore
$$ lim_{xto 1^+} f(x) = lim_{xto 1^+} ln(ln(x^2)/ln(x)) = ln(lim_{xto 1^+} ln(x^2)/ln(x)) = ln(lim_{xto 1^+} x^{-2}2x/(x^{-1}) = ln(2). $$
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
To calculate the limit itself (and not address the differentiability question)...
Below, consider $x>1$ as fixed, and make (as Tommaso does) the substitution $t = e^s$. Then
$$f(x) = int_x^{x^2} {dt over ln t} = int_{ln x}^{2ln x} {e^sover s}, ds.$$
Make the substitution $s = u ln x$:
$$ f(x) = int^2_1 e^{uln x} {duover u}.$$
As $xdownarrow 1$, we see that
$$ f(x) to int^2_1{duover u}= ln 2.$$
(Bringing the limit inside the integral is valid - by dominated convergence, for instance.)
Addendum/Edit:
1) The same argument works starting with $0<x<1$, and taking $xuparrow 1$.
2) If one sets $f(1) = ln 2$, one has that
$$ f(x) = int^2_1 e^{u ln x} {duover u}$$
identically, for $xin (0,infty)$. So, on condition that you can show that to calculate limits, one can perform the same corresponding calculations on the integrand, you can show that $f$ is differentiable.
add a comment |
To calculate the limit itself (and not address the differentiability question)...
Below, consider $x>1$ as fixed, and make (as Tommaso does) the substitution $t = e^s$. Then
$$f(x) = int_x^{x^2} {dt over ln t} = int_{ln x}^{2ln x} {e^sover s}, ds.$$
Make the substitution $s = u ln x$:
$$ f(x) = int^2_1 e^{uln x} {duover u}.$$
As $xdownarrow 1$, we see that
$$ f(x) to int^2_1{duover u}= ln 2.$$
(Bringing the limit inside the integral is valid - by dominated convergence, for instance.)
Addendum/Edit:
1) The same argument works starting with $0<x<1$, and taking $xuparrow 1$.
2) If one sets $f(1) = ln 2$, one has that
$$ f(x) = int^2_1 e^{u ln x} {duover u}$$
identically, for $xin (0,infty)$. So, on condition that you can show that to calculate limits, one can perform the same corresponding calculations on the integrand, you can show that $f$ is differentiable.
add a comment |
To calculate the limit itself (and not address the differentiability question)...
Below, consider $x>1$ as fixed, and make (as Tommaso does) the substitution $t = e^s$. Then
$$f(x) = int_x^{x^2} {dt over ln t} = int_{ln x}^{2ln x} {e^sover s}, ds.$$
Make the substitution $s = u ln x$:
$$ f(x) = int^2_1 e^{uln x} {duover u}.$$
As $xdownarrow 1$, we see that
$$ f(x) to int^2_1{duover u}= ln 2.$$
(Bringing the limit inside the integral is valid - by dominated convergence, for instance.)
Addendum/Edit:
1) The same argument works starting with $0<x<1$, and taking $xuparrow 1$.
2) If one sets $f(1) = ln 2$, one has that
$$ f(x) = int^2_1 e^{u ln x} {duover u}$$
identically, for $xin (0,infty)$. So, on condition that you can show that to calculate limits, one can perform the same corresponding calculations on the integrand, you can show that $f$ is differentiable.
To calculate the limit itself (and not address the differentiability question)...
Below, consider $x>1$ as fixed, and make (as Tommaso does) the substitution $t = e^s$. Then
$$f(x) = int_x^{x^2} {dt over ln t} = int_{ln x}^{2ln x} {e^sover s}, ds.$$
Make the substitution $s = u ln x$:
$$ f(x) = int^2_1 e^{uln x} {duover u}.$$
As $xdownarrow 1$, we see that
$$ f(x) to int^2_1{duover u}= ln 2.$$
(Bringing the limit inside the integral is valid - by dominated convergence, for instance.)
Addendum/Edit:
1) The same argument works starting with $0<x<1$, and taking $xuparrow 1$.
2) If one sets $f(1) = ln 2$, one has that
$$ f(x) = int^2_1 e^{u ln x} {duover u}$$
identically, for $xin (0,infty)$. So, on condition that you can show that to calculate limits, one can perform the same corresponding calculations on the integrand, you can show that $f$ is differentiable.
edited 11 hours ago
answered 14 hours ago
peter a g
3,1001614
3,1001614
add a comment |
add a comment |
First change variables $t = e^s$ and get
$$ int_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} e^s s^{-1}ds. $$
Now expand the exponential around zero $e^s = sum_{ngeq 0} s^n/n!$ and pass the series outside the integral as $s^{-1} s^n/n! |_{(ln(x),ln(x^2)}$ converges uniformly to $0$. Pay attention to the first term, as $s^0/0!equiv 1$
begin{align*} int_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} (1 + sum_{ngeq 1}s^n/n!) s^{-1}ds &= left. ln(s) + sum_{ngeq 1} s^n/(n!n) right|_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} \
& = ln(ln(x^2)/ln(x)) + sum_{ngeq 1} (2^n-1)ln(x)^n/(n!n).
end{align*}
The term on the right goes to zero as $xto 0$ because the series converges absolutely in a right neighborhood of $1$. Therefore
$$ lim_{xto 1^+} f(x) = lim_{xto 1^+} ln(ln(x^2)/ln(x)) = ln(lim_{xto 1^+} ln(x^2)/ln(x)) = ln(lim_{xto 1^+} x^{-2}2x/(x^{-1}) = ln(2). $$
add a comment |
First change variables $t = e^s$ and get
$$ int_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} e^s s^{-1}ds. $$
Now expand the exponential around zero $e^s = sum_{ngeq 0} s^n/n!$ and pass the series outside the integral as $s^{-1} s^n/n! |_{(ln(x),ln(x^2)}$ converges uniformly to $0$. Pay attention to the first term, as $s^0/0!equiv 1$
begin{align*} int_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} (1 + sum_{ngeq 1}s^n/n!) s^{-1}ds &= left. ln(s) + sum_{ngeq 1} s^n/(n!n) right|_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} \
& = ln(ln(x^2)/ln(x)) + sum_{ngeq 1} (2^n-1)ln(x)^n/(n!n).
end{align*}
The term on the right goes to zero as $xto 0$ because the series converges absolutely in a right neighborhood of $1$. Therefore
$$ lim_{xto 1^+} f(x) = lim_{xto 1^+} ln(ln(x^2)/ln(x)) = ln(lim_{xto 1^+} ln(x^2)/ln(x)) = ln(lim_{xto 1^+} x^{-2}2x/(x^{-1}) = ln(2). $$
add a comment |
First change variables $t = e^s$ and get
$$ int_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} e^s s^{-1}ds. $$
Now expand the exponential around zero $e^s = sum_{ngeq 0} s^n/n!$ and pass the series outside the integral as $s^{-1} s^n/n! |_{(ln(x),ln(x^2)}$ converges uniformly to $0$. Pay attention to the first term, as $s^0/0!equiv 1$
begin{align*} int_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} (1 + sum_{ngeq 1}s^n/n!) s^{-1}ds &= left. ln(s) + sum_{ngeq 1} s^n/(n!n) right|_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} \
& = ln(ln(x^2)/ln(x)) + sum_{ngeq 1} (2^n-1)ln(x)^n/(n!n).
end{align*}
The term on the right goes to zero as $xto 0$ because the series converges absolutely in a right neighborhood of $1$. Therefore
$$ lim_{xto 1^+} f(x) = lim_{xto 1^+} ln(ln(x^2)/ln(x)) = ln(lim_{xto 1^+} ln(x^2)/ln(x)) = ln(lim_{xto 1^+} x^{-2}2x/(x^{-1}) = ln(2). $$
First change variables $t = e^s$ and get
$$ int_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} e^s s^{-1}ds. $$
Now expand the exponential around zero $e^s = sum_{ngeq 0} s^n/n!$ and pass the series outside the integral as $s^{-1} s^n/n! |_{(ln(x),ln(x^2)}$ converges uniformly to $0$. Pay attention to the first term, as $s^0/0!equiv 1$
begin{align*} int_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} (1 + sum_{ngeq 1}s^n/n!) s^{-1}ds &= left. ln(s) + sum_{ngeq 1} s^n/(n!n) right|_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} \
& = ln(ln(x^2)/ln(x)) + sum_{ngeq 1} (2^n-1)ln(x)^n/(n!n).
end{align*}
The term on the right goes to zero as $xto 0$ because the series converges absolutely in a right neighborhood of $1$. Therefore
$$ lim_{xto 1^+} f(x) = lim_{xto 1^+} ln(ln(x^2)/ln(x)) = ln(lim_{xto 1^+} ln(x^2)/ln(x)) = ln(lim_{xto 1^+} x^{-2}2x/(x^{-1}) = ln(2). $$
answered 15 hours ago


Tommaso Seneci
99428
99428
add a comment |
add a comment |
j9mGMB,jM,ICst86nq1HFyh1nV1nt,9HH,dm igl 7toi,onSxWRPsdIkhhvaDb QBtl
1
Your integral itself is a very special integral called the Logarithmic Integral. If you were to evaluate the given integral, you would get $ lim_{x to 1 } (Gamma{(0, -ln x)} - Gamma{(0, -2 ln x)} )$
– Tusky
16 hours ago
The3 result should be $$ln(2)$$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
16 hours ago