Evaluate definite integral with variable limits [on hold]












1














Consider the function $f: (0, infty) to R $



$$ f(x)= begin{cases}
int_{x}^{x^2} frac{dt}{log(t)} & xneq 1 \
l & x=1 \
end{cases}
$$



Determine $l$ such that the function $f$ should be continuous at 1. For the determined value of $l$, is the function differentiable?



I started out by trying to calculate the following limit, however, I had trouble continuing.



$$lim_{xto1}int_{x}^{x^2}frac{mathrm dt}{log(t)}$$



Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Deniz Atalar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as off-topic by amWhy, RRL, Abcd, jgon, rtybase 9 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – amWhy, RRL, Abcd, jgon, rtybase

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 1




    Your integral itself is a very special integral called the Logarithmic Integral. If you were to evaluate the given integral, you would get $ lim_{x to 1 } (Gamma{(0, -ln x)} - Gamma{(0, -2 ln x)} )$
    – Tusky
    16 hours ago












  • The3 result should be $$ln(2)$$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    16 hours ago
















1














Consider the function $f: (0, infty) to R $



$$ f(x)= begin{cases}
int_{x}^{x^2} frac{dt}{log(t)} & xneq 1 \
l & x=1 \
end{cases}
$$



Determine $l$ such that the function $f$ should be continuous at 1. For the determined value of $l$, is the function differentiable?



I started out by trying to calculate the following limit, however, I had trouble continuing.



$$lim_{xto1}int_{x}^{x^2}frac{mathrm dt}{log(t)}$$



Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Deniz Atalar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as off-topic by amWhy, RRL, Abcd, jgon, rtybase 9 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – amWhy, RRL, Abcd, jgon, rtybase

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 1




    Your integral itself is a very special integral called the Logarithmic Integral. If you were to evaluate the given integral, you would get $ lim_{x to 1 } (Gamma{(0, -ln x)} - Gamma{(0, -2 ln x)} )$
    – Tusky
    16 hours ago












  • The3 result should be $$ln(2)$$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    16 hours ago














1












1








1


0





Consider the function $f: (0, infty) to R $



$$ f(x)= begin{cases}
int_{x}^{x^2} frac{dt}{log(t)} & xneq 1 \
l & x=1 \
end{cases}
$$



Determine $l$ such that the function $f$ should be continuous at 1. For the determined value of $l$, is the function differentiable?



I started out by trying to calculate the following limit, however, I had trouble continuing.



$$lim_{xto1}int_{x}^{x^2}frac{mathrm dt}{log(t)}$$



Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Deniz Atalar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Consider the function $f: (0, infty) to R $



$$ f(x)= begin{cases}
int_{x}^{x^2} frac{dt}{log(t)} & xneq 1 \
l & x=1 \
end{cases}
$$



Determine $l$ such that the function $f$ should be continuous at 1. For the determined value of $l$, is the function differentiable?



I started out by trying to calculate the following limit, however, I had trouble continuing.



$$lim_{xto1}int_{x}^{x^2}frac{mathrm dt}{log(t)}$$



Thank you!







real-analysis calculus integration definite-integrals






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Deniz Atalar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Deniz Atalar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 16 hours ago





















New contributor




Deniz Atalar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 17 hours ago









Deniz Atalar

92




92




New contributor




Deniz Atalar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Deniz Atalar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Deniz Atalar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as off-topic by amWhy, RRL, Abcd, jgon, rtybase 9 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – amWhy, RRL, Abcd, jgon, rtybase

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




put on hold as off-topic by amWhy, RRL, Abcd, jgon, rtybase 9 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – amWhy, RRL, Abcd, jgon, rtybase

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 1




    Your integral itself is a very special integral called the Logarithmic Integral. If you were to evaluate the given integral, you would get $ lim_{x to 1 } (Gamma{(0, -ln x)} - Gamma{(0, -2 ln x)} )$
    – Tusky
    16 hours ago












  • The3 result should be $$ln(2)$$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    16 hours ago














  • 1




    Your integral itself is a very special integral called the Logarithmic Integral. If you were to evaluate the given integral, you would get $ lim_{x to 1 } (Gamma{(0, -ln x)} - Gamma{(0, -2 ln x)} )$
    – Tusky
    16 hours ago












  • The3 result should be $$ln(2)$$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    16 hours ago








1




1




Your integral itself is a very special integral called the Logarithmic Integral. If you were to evaluate the given integral, you would get $ lim_{x to 1 } (Gamma{(0, -ln x)} - Gamma{(0, -2 ln x)} )$
– Tusky
16 hours ago






Your integral itself is a very special integral called the Logarithmic Integral. If you were to evaluate the given integral, you would get $ lim_{x to 1 } (Gamma{(0, -ln x)} - Gamma{(0, -2 ln x)} )$
– Tusky
16 hours ago














The3 result should be $$ln(2)$$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
16 hours ago




The3 result should be $$ln(2)$$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
16 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














To calculate the limit itself (and not address the differentiability question)...



Below, consider $x>1$ as fixed, and make (as Tommaso does) the substitution $t = e^s$. Then



$$f(x) = int_x^{x^2} {dt over ln t} = int_{ln x}^{2ln x} {e^sover s}, ds.$$
Make the substitution $s = u ln x$:
$$ f(x) = int^2_1 e^{uln x} {duover u}.$$



As $xdownarrow 1$, we see that
$$ f(x) to int^2_1{duover u}= ln 2.$$
(Bringing the limit inside the integral is valid - by dominated convergence, for instance.)



Addendum/Edit:



1) The same argument works starting with $0<x<1$, and taking $xuparrow 1$.



2) If one sets $f(1) = ln 2$, one has that



$$ f(x) = int^2_1 e^{u ln x} {duover u}$$



identically, for $xin (0,infty)$. So, on condition that you can show that to calculate limits, one can perform the same corresponding calculations on the integrand, you can show that $f$ is differentiable.






share|cite|improve this answer































    1














    First change variables $t = e^s$ and get
    $$ int_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} e^s s^{-1}ds. $$
    Now expand the exponential around zero $e^s = sum_{ngeq 0} s^n/n!$ and pass the series outside the integral as $s^{-1} s^n/n! |_{(ln(x),ln(x^2)}$ converges uniformly to $0$. Pay attention to the first term, as $s^0/0!equiv 1$
    begin{align*} int_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} (1 + sum_{ngeq 1}s^n/n!) s^{-1}ds &= left. ln(s) + sum_{ngeq 1} s^n/(n!n) right|_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} \
    & = ln(ln(x^2)/ln(x)) + sum_{ngeq 1} (2^n-1)ln(x)^n/(n!n).
    end{align*}

    The term on the right goes to zero as $xto 0$ because the series converges absolutely in a right neighborhood of $1$. Therefore
    $$ lim_{xto 1^+} f(x) = lim_{xto 1^+} ln(ln(x^2)/ln(x)) = ln(lim_{xto 1^+} ln(x^2)/ln(x)) = ln(lim_{xto 1^+} x^{-2}2x/(x^{-1}) = ln(2). $$






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3














      To calculate the limit itself (and not address the differentiability question)...



      Below, consider $x>1$ as fixed, and make (as Tommaso does) the substitution $t = e^s$. Then



      $$f(x) = int_x^{x^2} {dt over ln t} = int_{ln x}^{2ln x} {e^sover s}, ds.$$
      Make the substitution $s = u ln x$:
      $$ f(x) = int^2_1 e^{uln x} {duover u}.$$



      As $xdownarrow 1$, we see that
      $$ f(x) to int^2_1{duover u}= ln 2.$$
      (Bringing the limit inside the integral is valid - by dominated convergence, for instance.)



      Addendum/Edit:



      1) The same argument works starting with $0<x<1$, and taking $xuparrow 1$.



      2) If one sets $f(1) = ln 2$, one has that



      $$ f(x) = int^2_1 e^{u ln x} {duover u}$$



      identically, for $xin (0,infty)$. So, on condition that you can show that to calculate limits, one can perform the same corresponding calculations on the integrand, you can show that $f$ is differentiable.






      share|cite|improve this answer




























        3














        To calculate the limit itself (and not address the differentiability question)...



        Below, consider $x>1$ as fixed, and make (as Tommaso does) the substitution $t = e^s$. Then



        $$f(x) = int_x^{x^2} {dt over ln t} = int_{ln x}^{2ln x} {e^sover s}, ds.$$
        Make the substitution $s = u ln x$:
        $$ f(x) = int^2_1 e^{uln x} {duover u}.$$



        As $xdownarrow 1$, we see that
        $$ f(x) to int^2_1{duover u}= ln 2.$$
        (Bringing the limit inside the integral is valid - by dominated convergence, for instance.)



        Addendum/Edit:



        1) The same argument works starting with $0<x<1$, and taking $xuparrow 1$.



        2) If one sets $f(1) = ln 2$, one has that



        $$ f(x) = int^2_1 e^{u ln x} {duover u}$$



        identically, for $xin (0,infty)$. So, on condition that you can show that to calculate limits, one can perform the same corresponding calculations on the integrand, you can show that $f$ is differentiable.






        share|cite|improve this answer


























          3












          3








          3






          To calculate the limit itself (and not address the differentiability question)...



          Below, consider $x>1$ as fixed, and make (as Tommaso does) the substitution $t = e^s$. Then



          $$f(x) = int_x^{x^2} {dt over ln t} = int_{ln x}^{2ln x} {e^sover s}, ds.$$
          Make the substitution $s = u ln x$:
          $$ f(x) = int^2_1 e^{uln x} {duover u}.$$



          As $xdownarrow 1$, we see that
          $$ f(x) to int^2_1{duover u}= ln 2.$$
          (Bringing the limit inside the integral is valid - by dominated convergence, for instance.)



          Addendum/Edit:



          1) The same argument works starting with $0<x<1$, and taking $xuparrow 1$.



          2) If one sets $f(1) = ln 2$, one has that



          $$ f(x) = int^2_1 e^{u ln x} {duover u}$$



          identically, for $xin (0,infty)$. So, on condition that you can show that to calculate limits, one can perform the same corresponding calculations on the integrand, you can show that $f$ is differentiable.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          To calculate the limit itself (and not address the differentiability question)...



          Below, consider $x>1$ as fixed, and make (as Tommaso does) the substitution $t = e^s$. Then



          $$f(x) = int_x^{x^2} {dt over ln t} = int_{ln x}^{2ln x} {e^sover s}, ds.$$
          Make the substitution $s = u ln x$:
          $$ f(x) = int^2_1 e^{uln x} {duover u}.$$



          As $xdownarrow 1$, we see that
          $$ f(x) to int^2_1{duover u}= ln 2.$$
          (Bringing the limit inside the integral is valid - by dominated convergence, for instance.)



          Addendum/Edit:



          1) The same argument works starting with $0<x<1$, and taking $xuparrow 1$.



          2) If one sets $f(1) = ln 2$, one has that



          $$ f(x) = int^2_1 e^{u ln x} {duover u}$$



          identically, for $xin (0,infty)$. So, on condition that you can show that to calculate limits, one can perform the same corresponding calculations on the integrand, you can show that $f$ is differentiable.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 11 hours ago

























          answered 14 hours ago









          peter a g

          3,1001614




          3,1001614























              1














              First change variables $t = e^s$ and get
              $$ int_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} e^s s^{-1}ds. $$
              Now expand the exponential around zero $e^s = sum_{ngeq 0} s^n/n!$ and pass the series outside the integral as $s^{-1} s^n/n! |_{(ln(x),ln(x^2)}$ converges uniformly to $0$. Pay attention to the first term, as $s^0/0!equiv 1$
              begin{align*} int_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} (1 + sum_{ngeq 1}s^n/n!) s^{-1}ds &= left. ln(s) + sum_{ngeq 1} s^n/(n!n) right|_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} \
              & = ln(ln(x^2)/ln(x)) + sum_{ngeq 1} (2^n-1)ln(x)^n/(n!n).
              end{align*}

              The term on the right goes to zero as $xto 0$ because the series converges absolutely in a right neighborhood of $1$. Therefore
              $$ lim_{xto 1^+} f(x) = lim_{xto 1^+} ln(ln(x^2)/ln(x)) = ln(lim_{xto 1^+} ln(x^2)/ln(x)) = ln(lim_{xto 1^+} x^{-2}2x/(x^{-1}) = ln(2). $$






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                1














                First change variables $t = e^s$ and get
                $$ int_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} e^s s^{-1}ds. $$
                Now expand the exponential around zero $e^s = sum_{ngeq 0} s^n/n!$ and pass the series outside the integral as $s^{-1} s^n/n! |_{(ln(x),ln(x^2)}$ converges uniformly to $0$. Pay attention to the first term, as $s^0/0!equiv 1$
                begin{align*} int_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} (1 + sum_{ngeq 1}s^n/n!) s^{-1}ds &= left. ln(s) + sum_{ngeq 1} s^n/(n!n) right|_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} \
                & = ln(ln(x^2)/ln(x)) + sum_{ngeq 1} (2^n-1)ln(x)^n/(n!n).
                end{align*}

                The term on the right goes to zero as $xto 0$ because the series converges absolutely in a right neighborhood of $1$. Therefore
                $$ lim_{xto 1^+} f(x) = lim_{xto 1^+} ln(ln(x^2)/ln(x)) = ln(lim_{xto 1^+} ln(x^2)/ln(x)) = ln(lim_{xto 1^+} x^{-2}2x/(x^{-1}) = ln(2). $$






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  1












                  1








                  1






                  First change variables $t = e^s$ and get
                  $$ int_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} e^s s^{-1}ds. $$
                  Now expand the exponential around zero $e^s = sum_{ngeq 0} s^n/n!$ and pass the series outside the integral as $s^{-1} s^n/n! |_{(ln(x),ln(x^2)}$ converges uniformly to $0$. Pay attention to the first term, as $s^0/0!equiv 1$
                  begin{align*} int_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} (1 + sum_{ngeq 1}s^n/n!) s^{-1}ds &= left. ln(s) + sum_{ngeq 1} s^n/(n!n) right|_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} \
                  & = ln(ln(x^2)/ln(x)) + sum_{ngeq 1} (2^n-1)ln(x)^n/(n!n).
                  end{align*}

                  The term on the right goes to zero as $xto 0$ because the series converges absolutely in a right neighborhood of $1$. Therefore
                  $$ lim_{xto 1^+} f(x) = lim_{xto 1^+} ln(ln(x^2)/ln(x)) = ln(lim_{xto 1^+} ln(x^2)/ln(x)) = ln(lim_{xto 1^+} x^{-2}2x/(x^{-1}) = ln(2). $$






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  First change variables $t = e^s$ and get
                  $$ int_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} e^s s^{-1}ds. $$
                  Now expand the exponential around zero $e^s = sum_{ngeq 0} s^n/n!$ and pass the series outside the integral as $s^{-1} s^n/n! |_{(ln(x),ln(x^2)}$ converges uniformly to $0$. Pay attention to the first term, as $s^0/0!equiv 1$
                  begin{align*} int_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} (1 + sum_{ngeq 1}s^n/n!) s^{-1}ds &= left. ln(s) + sum_{ngeq 1} s^n/(n!n) right|_{ln(x)}^{ln(x^2)} \
                  & = ln(ln(x^2)/ln(x)) + sum_{ngeq 1} (2^n-1)ln(x)^n/(n!n).
                  end{align*}

                  The term on the right goes to zero as $xto 0$ because the series converges absolutely in a right neighborhood of $1$. Therefore
                  $$ lim_{xto 1^+} f(x) = lim_{xto 1^+} ln(ln(x^2)/ln(x)) = ln(lim_{xto 1^+} ln(x^2)/ln(x)) = ln(lim_{xto 1^+} x^{-2}2x/(x^{-1}) = ln(2). $$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 15 hours ago









                  Tommaso Seneci

                  99428




                  99428















                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Mario Kart Wii

                      What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

                      Antonio Litta Visconti Arese