Do Diagonal Matrices Always Commute?












22












$begingroup$


Let $A$ be an $n times n$ matrix and let $Lambda$ be an $n times n$ diagonal matrix. Is it always the case that $ALambda = Lambda A$? If not, when is it the case that $A Lambda = Lambda A$?



If we restrict the diagonal entries of $Lambda$ to being the equal (i.e. $Lambda = text{drag}(a, a, dots, a)$), then it is clear that $ALambda = AaI = aIA = Lambda A$. However, I can't seem to come up with an argument for the general case.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Have you tried simple examples?
    $endgroup$
    – Friedrich Philipp
    Mar 15 '16 at 1:18






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    When the diagonal matrix is on the right, it scales the columns of the matrix it is multiplying. when the diagonal matrix is on the left, it scales the rows. Since column-scaling and row scaling are different operations, there are only very limited circumstances that the matrices will commute.
    $endgroup$
    – Nick Alger
    Mar 15 '16 at 1:30
















22












$begingroup$


Let $A$ be an $n times n$ matrix and let $Lambda$ be an $n times n$ diagonal matrix. Is it always the case that $ALambda = Lambda A$? If not, when is it the case that $A Lambda = Lambda A$?



If we restrict the diagonal entries of $Lambda$ to being the equal (i.e. $Lambda = text{drag}(a, a, dots, a)$), then it is clear that $ALambda = AaI = aIA = Lambda A$. However, I can't seem to come up with an argument for the general case.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Have you tried simple examples?
    $endgroup$
    – Friedrich Philipp
    Mar 15 '16 at 1:18






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    When the diagonal matrix is on the right, it scales the columns of the matrix it is multiplying. when the diagonal matrix is on the left, it scales the rows. Since column-scaling and row scaling are different operations, there are only very limited circumstances that the matrices will commute.
    $endgroup$
    – Nick Alger
    Mar 15 '16 at 1:30














22












22








22


9



$begingroup$


Let $A$ be an $n times n$ matrix and let $Lambda$ be an $n times n$ diagonal matrix. Is it always the case that $ALambda = Lambda A$? If not, when is it the case that $A Lambda = Lambda A$?



If we restrict the diagonal entries of $Lambda$ to being the equal (i.e. $Lambda = text{drag}(a, a, dots, a)$), then it is clear that $ALambda = AaI = aIA = Lambda A$. However, I can't seem to come up with an argument for the general case.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $A$ be an $n times n$ matrix and let $Lambda$ be an $n times n$ diagonal matrix. Is it always the case that $ALambda = Lambda A$? If not, when is it the case that $A Lambda = Lambda A$?



If we restrict the diagonal entries of $Lambda$ to being the equal (i.e. $Lambda = text{drag}(a, a, dots, a)$), then it is clear that $ALambda = AaI = aIA = Lambda A$. However, I can't seem to come up with an argument for the general case.







linear-algebra matrices






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 15 '16 at 1:13









Jeff ScottJeff Scott

114113




114113








  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Have you tried simple examples?
    $endgroup$
    – Friedrich Philipp
    Mar 15 '16 at 1:18






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    When the diagonal matrix is on the right, it scales the columns of the matrix it is multiplying. when the diagonal matrix is on the left, it scales the rows. Since column-scaling and row scaling are different operations, there are only very limited circumstances that the matrices will commute.
    $endgroup$
    – Nick Alger
    Mar 15 '16 at 1:30














  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Have you tried simple examples?
    $endgroup$
    – Friedrich Philipp
    Mar 15 '16 at 1:18






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    When the diagonal matrix is on the right, it scales the columns of the matrix it is multiplying. when the diagonal matrix is on the left, it scales the rows. Since column-scaling and row scaling are different operations, there are only very limited circumstances that the matrices will commute.
    $endgroup$
    – Nick Alger
    Mar 15 '16 at 1:30








7




7




$begingroup$
Have you tried simple examples?
$endgroup$
– Friedrich Philipp
Mar 15 '16 at 1:18




$begingroup$
Have you tried simple examples?
$endgroup$
– Friedrich Philipp
Mar 15 '16 at 1:18




6




6




$begingroup$
When the diagonal matrix is on the right, it scales the columns of the matrix it is multiplying. when the diagonal matrix is on the left, it scales the rows. Since column-scaling and row scaling are different operations, there are only very limited circumstances that the matrices will commute.
$endgroup$
– Nick Alger
Mar 15 '16 at 1:30




$begingroup$
When the diagonal matrix is on the right, it scales the columns of the matrix it is multiplying. when the diagonal matrix is on the left, it scales the rows. Since column-scaling and row scaling are different operations, there are only very limited circumstances that the matrices will commute.
$endgroup$
– Nick Alger
Mar 15 '16 at 1:30










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















17












$begingroup$

If all the diagonal entries of$Lambda$ are distinct, it commutes only with diagonal matrices.



In contrast, for each $k$ consecutive equal diagonal entries in $Lambda,$ we may allow $A$ to have anything at all in the corresponding $k$ by $k$ square block with both corners on the main diagonal.



This means that the set of matrices that commute with $Lambda$ has a minimum dimension $n$ and a maximum dimension $n^2.$ Suppose we have $r$ different diagonal entries, and there are $k_i$ copies of diagonal entry $lambda_i.$ Each $k_i geq 1,$ and we have
$$ k_1 + k_2 + cdots + k_r = n. $$
Then by the block construction I mentioned above, the dimension of the space of matrices that commute with $Lambda$ is
$$ k_1^2 + k_2^2 + cdots + k_r^2. $$
The minimum is when $r=n,$ so all $k_i = 1,$ and the dimension is $n$



The maximum is when $r=1,$ and $k_1=n,$ the matrix is a scalar multiple of the identity matrix, and the dimension is $n^2.$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Do the copies have to be right next to each other? e.g. diag(1,1,1,2,2,7,8,8)?
    $endgroup$
    – Hrit Roy
    Feb 8 '18 at 5:25










  • $begingroup$
    @HritRoy, no. You can change your basis to express the copies next to each other if you want to. But it is not necessary
    $endgroup$
    – Vladimir Vargas
    Apr 27 '18 at 22:22



















10












$begingroup$

It is possible that a diagonal matrix $Lambda$ commutes with a matrix $A$ when $A$ is symmetric and $A Lambda$ is also symmetric. We have



$$
Lambda A = (A^{top}Lambda^top)^{top} = (ALambda)^top = ALambda
$$



The above trivially holds when $A$ and $Lambda$ are both diagonal.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You are right - thanks. I modified my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – user322903
    Mar 15 '16 at 1:50



















7












$begingroup$

A diagonal matrix will not commute with every matrix.



$$
begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 2 end{pmatrix}*begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix}=begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix}$$



But:



$$begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix} * begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 2 end{pmatrix} = begin{pmatrix} 0 & 2 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix}.$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    The claim is false in general. Take $A = begin{bmatrix}1 & 2\3 & 4end{bmatrix}$
    $Lambda = begin{bmatrix}2 & 0\0 & 3end{bmatrix}$. Then



    $A Lambda = begin{bmatrix}2 & 6\6 & 12end{bmatrix}$



    $Lambda A = begin{bmatrix}2 & 4\9 & 12end{bmatrix}$



    On a more useful note, you can look up commuting matrices on Wikipedia.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      0












      $begingroup$

      We want to find $Lambda$ such that $ALambda=Lambda A$. Then we have $$left( begin{array}{cc}
      sum a_{1n}lambda_{n1} & sum a_{1n}lambda_{n2} & sum a_{1n}lambda_{n3} & ... \
      sum a_{2n}lambda_{n1} & sum a_{2n}lambda_{n2} & sum a_{2n}lambda_{n3} & ...\
      sum a_{3n}lambda_{n1} & sum a_{3n}lambda_{n2} & sum a_{3n}lambda_{n3} & ...\
      ... & ... & ... & ...end{array} right)=left( begin{array}{cc}
      sum a_{n1}lambda_{1n} & sum a_{n1}lambda_{2n} & sum a_{n1}lambda_{3n} & ... \
      sum a_{n2}lambda_{1n} & sum a_{n2}lambda_{2n} & sum a_{n2}lambda_{3n} & ...\
      sum a_{n3}lambda_{1n} & sum a_{n3}lambda_{2n} & sum a_{n3}lambda_{3n} & ...\
      ... & ... & ... & ...end{array} right)$$ Hence for the equality to hold, both $A$ and $Lambda$ must be symmetric since $a_{in}=a_{ni}$ and $lambda_{in}=lambda_{ni}$ for $i=1,2,3,...$ A diagonal matrix is a special case of this.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Hello, what is the name of this theorem? Or where is it in a book? I want to reference it. Thanks a lot.
        $endgroup$
        – Vladimir Vargas
        Apr 27 '18 at 22:09










      • $begingroup$
        I am not aware of a theorem whose result is this since it is just derived from the definition.
        $endgroup$
        – TheSimpliFire
        Apr 28 '18 at 8:20










      • $begingroup$
        "both $A$ and $Lambda$ must be symmetric" <-- not true as stated (it's not a necessary condition); also, $Lambda$ is symmetric already (being diagonal).
        $endgroup$
        – darij grinberg
        Jan 12 at 22:45





















      0












      $begingroup$

      The answer from @AOK is not generally true. Obviously for diagonal identical matrix $Lambda$ is valid only when $A$ is symmetric matrix.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1697991%2fdo-diagonal-matrices-always-commute%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes








        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        17












        $begingroup$

        If all the diagonal entries of$Lambda$ are distinct, it commutes only with diagonal matrices.



        In contrast, for each $k$ consecutive equal diagonal entries in $Lambda,$ we may allow $A$ to have anything at all in the corresponding $k$ by $k$ square block with both corners on the main diagonal.



        This means that the set of matrices that commute with $Lambda$ has a minimum dimension $n$ and a maximum dimension $n^2.$ Suppose we have $r$ different diagonal entries, and there are $k_i$ copies of diagonal entry $lambda_i.$ Each $k_i geq 1,$ and we have
        $$ k_1 + k_2 + cdots + k_r = n. $$
        Then by the block construction I mentioned above, the dimension of the space of matrices that commute with $Lambda$ is
        $$ k_1^2 + k_2^2 + cdots + k_r^2. $$
        The minimum is when $r=n,$ so all $k_i = 1,$ and the dimension is $n$



        The maximum is when $r=1,$ and $k_1=n,$ the matrix is a scalar multiple of the identity matrix, and the dimension is $n^2.$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$













        • $begingroup$
          Do the copies have to be right next to each other? e.g. diag(1,1,1,2,2,7,8,8)?
          $endgroup$
          – Hrit Roy
          Feb 8 '18 at 5:25










        • $begingroup$
          @HritRoy, no. You can change your basis to express the copies next to each other if you want to. But it is not necessary
          $endgroup$
          – Vladimir Vargas
          Apr 27 '18 at 22:22
















        17












        $begingroup$

        If all the diagonal entries of$Lambda$ are distinct, it commutes only with diagonal matrices.



        In contrast, for each $k$ consecutive equal diagonal entries in $Lambda,$ we may allow $A$ to have anything at all in the corresponding $k$ by $k$ square block with both corners on the main diagonal.



        This means that the set of matrices that commute with $Lambda$ has a minimum dimension $n$ and a maximum dimension $n^2.$ Suppose we have $r$ different diagonal entries, and there are $k_i$ copies of diagonal entry $lambda_i.$ Each $k_i geq 1,$ and we have
        $$ k_1 + k_2 + cdots + k_r = n. $$
        Then by the block construction I mentioned above, the dimension of the space of matrices that commute with $Lambda$ is
        $$ k_1^2 + k_2^2 + cdots + k_r^2. $$
        The minimum is when $r=n,$ so all $k_i = 1,$ and the dimension is $n$



        The maximum is when $r=1,$ and $k_1=n,$ the matrix is a scalar multiple of the identity matrix, and the dimension is $n^2.$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$













        • $begingroup$
          Do the copies have to be right next to each other? e.g. diag(1,1,1,2,2,7,8,8)?
          $endgroup$
          – Hrit Roy
          Feb 8 '18 at 5:25










        • $begingroup$
          @HritRoy, no. You can change your basis to express the copies next to each other if you want to. But it is not necessary
          $endgroup$
          – Vladimir Vargas
          Apr 27 '18 at 22:22














        17












        17








        17





        $begingroup$

        If all the diagonal entries of$Lambda$ are distinct, it commutes only with diagonal matrices.



        In contrast, for each $k$ consecutive equal diagonal entries in $Lambda,$ we may allow $A$ to have anything at all in the corresponding $k$ by $k$ square block with both corners on the main diagonal.



        This means that the set of matrices that commute with $Lambda$ has a minimum dimension $n$ and a maximum dimension $n^2.$ Suppose we have $r$ different diagonal entries, and there are $k_i$ copies of diagonal entry $lambda_i.$ Each $k_i geq 1,$ and we have
        $$ k_1 + k_2 + cdots + k_r = n. $$
        Then by the block construction I mentioned above, the dimension of the space of matrices that commute with $Lambda$ is
        $$ k_1^2 + k_2^2 + cdots + k_r^2. $$
        The minimum is when $r=n,$ so all $k_i = 1,$ and the dimension is $n$



        The maximum is when $r=1,$ and $k_1=n,$ the matrix is a scalar multiple of the identity matrix, and the dimension is $n^2.$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        If all the diagonal entries of$Lambda$ are distinct, it commutes only with diagonal matrices.



        In contrast, for each $k$ consecutive equal diagonal entries in $Lambda,$ we may allow $A$ to have anything at all in the corresponding $k$ by $k$ square block with both corners on the main diagonal.



        This means that the set of matrices that commute with $Lambda$ has a minimum dimension $n$ and a maximum dimension $n^2.$ Suppose we have $r$ different diagonal entries, and there are $k_i$ copies of diagonal entry $lambda_i.$ Each $k_i geq 1,$ and we have
        $$ k_1 + k_2 + cdots + k_r = n. $$
        Then by the block construction I mentioned above, the dimension of the space of matrices that commute with $Lambda$ is
        $$ k_1^2 + k_2^2 + cdots + k_r^2. $$
        The minimum is when $r=n,$ so all $k_i = 1,$ and the dimension is $n$



        The maximum is when $r=1,$ and $k_1=n,$ the matrix is a scalar multiple of the identity matrix, and the dimension is $n^2.$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Mar 15 '16 at 2:44

























        answered Mar 15 '16 at 2:19









        Will JagyWill Jagy

        103k5101200




        103k5101200












        • $begingroup$
          Do the copies have to be right next to each other? e.g. diag(1,1,1,2,2,7,8,8)?
          $endgroup$
          – Hrit Roy
          Feb 8 '18 at 5:25










        • $begingroup$
          @HritRoy, no. You can change your basis to express the copies next to each other if you want to. But it is not necessary
          $endgroup$
          – Vladimir Vargas
          Apr 27 '18 at 22:22


















        • $begingroup$
          Do the copies have to be right next to each other? e.g. diag(1,1,1,2,2,7,8,8)?
          $endgroup$
          – Hrit Roy
          Feb 8 '18 at 5:25










        • $begingroup$
          @HritRoy, no. You can change your basis to express the copies next to each other if you want to. But it is not necessary
          $endgroup$
          – Vladimir Vargas
          Apr 27 '18 at 22:22
















        $begingroup$
        Do the copies have to be right next to each other? e.g. diag(1,1,1,2,2,7,8,8)?
        $endgroup$
        – Hrit Roy
        Feb 8 '18 at 5:25




        $begingroup$
        Do the copies have to be right next to each other? e.g. diag(1,1,1,2,2,7,8,8)?
        $endgroup$
        – Hrit Roy
        Feb 8 '18 at 5:25












        $begingroup$
        @HritRoy, no. You can change your basis to express the copies next to each other if you want to. But it is not necessary
        $endgroup$
        – Vladimir Vargas
        Apr 27 '18 at 22:22




        $begingroup$
        @HritRoy, no. You can change your basis to express the copies next to each other if you want to. But it is not necessary
        $endgroup$
        – Vladimir Vargas
        Apr 27 '18 at 22:22











        10












        $begingroup$

        It is possible that a diagonal matrix $Lambda$ commutes with a matrix $A$ when $A$ is symmetric and $A Lambda$ is also symmetric. We have



        $$
        Lambda A = (A^{top}Lambda^top)^{top} = (ALambda)^top = ALambda
        $$



        The above trivially holds when $A$ and $Lambda$ are both diagonal.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$









        • 1




          $begingroup$
          You are right - thanks. I modified my answer.
          $endgroup$
          – user322903
          Mar 15 '16 at 1:50
















        10












        $begingroup$

        It is possible that a diagonal matrix $Lambda$ commutes with a matrix $A$ when $A$ is symmetric and $A Lambda$ is also symmetric. We have



        $$
        Lambda A = (A^{top}Lambda^top)^{top} = (ALambda)^top = ALambda
        $$



        The above trivially holds when $A$ and $Lambda$ are both diagonal.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$









        • 1




          $begingroup$
          You are right - thanks. I modified my answer.
          $endgroup$
          – user322903
          Mar 15 '16 at 1:50














        10












        10








        10





        $begingroup$

        It is possible that a diagonal matrix $Lambda$ commutes with a matrix $A$ when $A$ is symmetric and $A Lambda$ is also symmetric. We have



        $$
        Lambda A = (A^{top}Lambda^top)^{top} = (ALambda)^top = ALambda
        $$



        The above trivially holds when $A$ and $Lambda$ are both diagonal.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        It is possible that a diagonal matrix $Lambda$ commutes with a matrix $A$ when $A$ is symmetric and $A Lambda$ is also symmetric. We have



        $$
        Lambda A = (A^{top}Lambda^top)^{top} = (ALambda)^top = ALambda
        $$



        The above trivially holds when $A$ and $Lambda$ are both diagonal.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Mar 15 '16 at 1:50

























        answered Mar 15 '16 at 1:45









        user322903user322903

        1264




        1264








        • 1




          $begingroup$
          You are right - thanks. I modified my answer.
          $endgroup$
          – user322903
          Mar 15 '16 at 1:50














        • 1




          $begingroup$
          You are right - thanks. I modified my answer.
          $endgroup$
          – user322903
          Mar 15 '16 at 1:50








        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        You are right - thanks. I modified my answer.
        $endgroup$
        – user322903
        Mar 15 '16 at 1:50




        $begingroup$
        You are right - thanks. I modified my answer.
        $endgroup$
        – user322903
        Mar 15 '16 at 1:50











        7












        $begingroup$

        A diagonal matrix will not commute with every matrix.



        $$
        begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 2 end{pmatrix}*begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix}=begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix}$$



        But:



        $$begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix} * begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 2 end{pmatrix} = begin{pmatrix} 0 & 2 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix}.$$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$


















          7












          $begingroup$

          A diagonal matrix will not commute with every matrix.



          $$
          begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 2 end{pmatrix}*begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix}=begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix}$$



          But:



          $$begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix} * begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 2 end{pmatrix} = begin{pmatrix} 0 & 2 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix}.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$
















            7












            7








            7





            $begingroup$

            A diagonal matrix will not commute with every matrix.



            $$
            begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 2 end{pmatrix}*begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix}=begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix}$$



            But:



            $$begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix} * begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 2 end{pmatrix} = begin{pmatrix} 0 & 2 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix}.$$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            A diagonal matrix will not commute with every matrix.



            $$
            begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 2 end{pmatrix}*begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix}=begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix}$$



            But:



            $$begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix} * begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \ 0 & 2 end{pmatrix} = begin{pmatrix} 0 & 2 \ 0 & 0 end{pmatrix}.$$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Mar 15 '16 at 2:49









            pjs36

            15.8k32962




            15.8k32962










            answered Mar 15 '16 at 1:25









            Gregory SimonGregory Simon

            49124




            49124























                1












                $begingroup$

                The claim is false in general. Take $A = begin{bmatrix}1 & 2\3 & 4end{bmatrix}$
                $Lambda = begin{bmatrix}2 & 0\0 & 3end{bmatrix}$. Then



                $A Lambda = begin{bmatrix}2 & 6\6 & 12end{bmatrix}$



                $Lambda A = begin{bmatrix}2 & 4\9 & 12end{bmatrix}$



                On a more useful note, you can look up commuting matrices on Wikipedia.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  The claim is false in general. Take $A = begin{bmatrix}1 & 2\3 & 4end{bmatrix}$
                  $Lambda = begin{bmatrix}2 & 0\0 & 3end{bmatrix}$. Then



                  $A Lambda = begin{bmatrix}2 & 6\6 & 12end{bmatrix}$



                  $Lambda A = begin{bmatrix}2 & 4\9 & 12end{bmatrix}$



                  On a more useful note, you can look up commuting matrices on Wikipedia.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    1












                    1








                    1





                    $begingroup$

                    The claim is false in general. Take $A = begin{bmatrix}1 & 2\3 & 4end{bmatrix}$
                    $Lambda = begin{bmatrix}2 & 0\0 & 3end{bmatrix}$. Then



                    $A Lambda = begin{bmatrix}2 & 6\6 & 12end{bmatrix}$



                    $Lambda A = begin{bmatrix}2 & 4\9 & 12end{bmatrix}$



                    On a more useful note, you can look up commuting matrices on Wikipedia.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    The claim is false in general. Take $A = begin{bmatrix}1 & 2\3 & 4end{bmatrix}$
                    $Lambda = begin{bmatrix}2 & 0\0 & 3end{bmatrix}$. Then



                    $A Lambda = begin{bmatrix}2 & 6\6 & 12end{bmatrix}$



                    $Lambda A = begin{bmatrix}2 & 4\9 & 12end{bmatrix}$



                    On a more useful note, you can look up commuting matrices on Wikipedia.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Mar 15 '16 at 1:31









                    cpiegorecpiegore

                    4882526




                    4882526























                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        We want to find $Lambda$ such that $ALambda=Lambda A$. Then we have $$left( begin{array}{cc}
                        sum a_{1n}lambda_{n1} & sum a_{1n}lambda_{n2} & sum a_{1n}lambda_{n3} & ... \
                        sum a_{2n}lambda_{n1} & sum a_{2n}lambda_{n2} & sum a_{2n}lambda_{n3} & ...\
                        sum a_{3n}lambda_{n1} & sum a_{3n}lambda_{n2} & sum a_{3n}lambda_{n3} & ...\
                        ... & ... & ... & ...end{array} right)=left( begin{array}{cc}
                        sum a_{n1}lambda_{1n} & sum a_{n1}lambda_{2n} & sum a_{n1}lambda_{3n} & ... \
                        sum a_{n2}lambda_{1n} & sum a_{n2}lambda_{2n} & sum a_{n2}lambda_{3n} & ...\
                        sum a_{n3}lambda_{1n} & sum a_{n3}lambda_{2n} & sum a_{n3}lambda_{3n} & ...\
                        ... & ... & ... & ...end{array} right)$$ Hence for the equality to hold, both $A$ and $Lambda$ must be symmetric since $a_{in}=a_{ni}$ and $lambda_{in}=lambda_{ni}$ for $i=1,2,3,...$ A diagonal matrix is a special case of this.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$













                        • $begingroup$
                          Hello, what is the name of this theorem? Or where is it in a book? I want to reference it. Thanks a lot.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Vladimir Vargas
                          Apr 27 '18 at 22:09










                        • $begingroup$
                          I am not aware of a theorem whose result is this since it is just derived from the definition.
                          $endgroup$
                          – TheSimpliFire
                          Apr 28 '18 at 8:20










                        • $begingroup$
                          "both $A$ and $Lambda$ must be symmetric" <-- not true as stated (it's not a necessary condition); also, $Lambda$ is symmetric already (being diagonal).
                          $endgroup$
                          – darij grinberg
                          Jan 12 at 22:45


















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        We want to find $Lambda$ such that $ALambda=Lambda A$. Then we have $$left( begin{array}{cc}
                        sum a_{1n}lambda_{n1} & sum a_{1n}lambda_{n2} & sum a_{1n}lambda_{n3} & ... \
                        sum a_{2n}lambda_{n1} & sum a_{2n}lambda_{n2} & sum a_{2n}lambda_{n3} & ...\
                        sum a_{3n}lambda_{n1} & sum a_{3n}lambda_{n2} & sum a_{3n}lambda_{n3} & ...\
                        ... & ... & ... & ...end{array} right)=left( begin{array}{cc}
                        sum a_{n1}lambda_{1n} & sum a_{n1}lambda_{2n} & sum a_{n1}lambda_{3n} & ... \
                        sum a_{n2}lambda_{1n} & sum a_{n2}lambda_{2n} & sum a_{n2}lambda_{3n} & ...\
                        sum a_{n3}lambda_{1n} & sum a_{n3}lambda_{2n} & sum a_{n3}lambda_{3n} & ...\
                        ... & ... & ... & ...end{array} right)$$ Hence for the equality to hold, both $A$ and $Lambda$ must be symmetric since $a_{in}=a_{ni}$ and $lambda_{in}=lambda_{ni}$ for $i=1,2,3,...$ A diagonal matrix is a special case of this.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$













                        • $begingroup$
                          Hello, what is the name of this theorem? Or where is it in a book? I want to reference it. Thanks a lot.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Vladimir Vargas
                          Apr 27 '18 at 22:09










                        • $begingroup$
                          I am not aware of a theorem whose result is this since it is just derived from the definition.
                          $endgroup$
                          – TheSimpliFire
                          Apr 28 '18 at 8:20










                        • $begingroup$
                          "both $A$ and $Lambda$ must be symmetric" <-- not true as stated (it's not a necessary condition); also, $Lambda$ is symmetric already (being diagonal).
                          $endgroup$
                          – darij grinberg
                          Jan 12 at 22:45
















                        0












                        0








                        0





                        $begingroup$

                        We want to find $Lambda$ such that $ALambda=Lambda A$. Then we have $$left( begin{array}{cc}
                        sum a_{1n}lambda_{n1} & sum a_{1n}lambda_{n2} & sum a_{1n}lambda_{n3} & ... \
                        sum a_{2n}lambda_{n1} & sum a_{2n}lambda_{n2} & sum a_{2n}lambda_{n3} & ...\
                        sum a_{3n}lambda_{n1} & sum a_{3n}lambda_{n2} & sum a_{3n}lambda_{n3} & ...\
                        ... & ... & ... & ...end{array} right)=left( begin{array}{cc}
                        sum a_{n1}lambda_{1n} & sum a_{n1}lambda_{2n} & sum a_{n1}lambda_{3n} & ... \
                        sum a_{n2}lambda_{1n} & sum a_{n2}lambda_{2n} & sum a_{n2}lambda_{3n} & ...\
                        sum a_{n3}lambda_{1n} & sum a_{n3}lambda_{2n} & sum a_{n3}lambda_{3n} & ...\
                        ... & ... & ... & ...end{array} right)$$ Hence for the equality to hold, both $A$ and $Lambda$ must be symmetric since $a_{in}=a_{ni}$ and $lambda_{in}=lambda_{ni}$ for $i=1,2,3,...$ A diagonal matrix is a special case of this.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$



                        We want to find $Lambda$ such that $ALambda=Lambda A$. Then we have $$left( begin{array}{cc}
                        sum a_{1n}lambda_{n1} & sum a_{1n}lambda_{n2} & sum a_{1n}lambda_{n3} & ... \
                        sum a_{2n}lambda_{n1} & sum a_{2n}lambda_{n2} & sum a_{2n}lambda_{n3} & ...\
                        sum a_{3n}lambda_{n1} & sum a_{3n}lambda_{n2} & sum a_{3n}lambda_{n3} & ...\
                        ... & ... & ... & ...end{array} right)=left( begin{array}{cc}
                        sum a_{n1}lambda_{1n} & sum a_{n1}lambda_{2n} & sum a_{n1}lambda_{3n} & ... \
                        sum a_{n2}lambda_{1n} & sum a_{n2}lambda_{2n} & sum a_{n2}lambda_{3n} & ...\
                        sum a_{n3}lambda_{1n} & sum a_{n3}lambda_{2n} & sum a_{n3}lambda_{3n} & ...\
                        ... & ... & ... & ...end{array} right)$$ Hence for the equality to hold, both $A$ and $Lambda$ must be symmetric since $a_{in}=a_{ni}$ and $lambda_{in}=lambda_{ni}$ for $i=1,2,3,...$ A diagonal matrix is a special case of this.







                        share|cite|improve this answer












                        share|cite|improve this answer



                        share|cite|improve this answer










                        answered Dec 16 '17 at 16:06









                        TheSimpliFireTheSimpliFire

                        12.4k62460




                        12.4k62460












                        • $begingroup$
                          Hello, what is the name of this theorem? Or where is it in a book? I want to reference it. Thanks a lot.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Vladimir Vargas
                          Apr 27 '18 at 22:09










                        • $begingroup$
                          I am not aware of a theorem whose result is this since it is just derived from the definition.
                          $endgroup$
                          – TheSimpliFire
                          Apr 28 '18 at 8:20










                        • $begingroup$
                          "both $A$ and $Lambda$ must be symmetric" <-- not true as stated (it's not a necessary condition); also, $Lambda$ is symmetric already (being diagonal).
                          $endgroup$
                          – darij grinberg
                          Jan 12 at 22:45




















                        • $begingroup$
                          Hello, what is the name of this theorem? Or where is it in a book? I want to reference it. Thanks a lot.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Vladimir Vargas
                          Apr 27 '18 at 22:09










                        • $begingroup$
                          I am not aware of a theorem whose result is this since it is just derived from the definition.
                          $endgroup$
                          – TheSimpliFire
                          Apr 28 '18 at 8:20










                        • $begingroup$
                          "both $A$ and $Lambda$ must be symmetric" <-- not true as stated (it's not a necessary condition); also, $Lambda$ is symmetric already (being diagonal).
                          $endgroup$
                          – darij grinberg
                          Jan 12 at 22:45


















                        $begingroup$
                        Hello, what is the name of this theorem? Or where is it in a book? I want to reference it. Thanks a lot.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Vladimir Vargas
                        Apr 27 '18 at 22:09




                        $begingroup$
                        Hello, what is the name of this theorem? Or where is it in a book? I want to reference it. Thanks a lot.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Vladimir Vargas
                        Apr 27 '18 at 22:09












                        $begingroup$
                        I am not aware of a theorem whose result is this since it is just derived from the definition.
                        $endgroup$
                        – TheSimpliFire
                        Apr 28 '18 at 8:20




                        $begingroup$
                        I am not aware of a theorem whose result is this since it is just derived from the definition.
                        $endgroup$
                        – TheSimpliFire
                        Apr 28 '18 at 8:20












                        $begingroup$
                        "both $A$ and $Lambda$ must be symmetric" <-- not true as stated (it's not a necessary condition); also, $Lambda$ is symmetric already (being diagonal).
                        $endgroup$
                        – darij grinberg
                        Jan 12 at 22:45






                        $begingroup$
                        "both $A$ and $Lambda$ must be symmetric" <-- not true as stated (it's not a necessary condition); also, $Lambda$ is symmetric already (being diagonal).
                        $endgroup$
                        – darij grinberg
                        Jan 12 at 22:45













                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        The answer from @AOK is not generally true. Obviously for diagonal identical matrix $Lambda$ is valid only when $A$ is symmetric matrix.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          The answer from @AOK is not generally true. Obviously for diagonal identical matrix $Lambda$ is valid only when $A$ is symmetric matrix.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            The answer from @AOK is not generally true. Obviously for diagonal identical matrix $Lambda$ is valid only when $A$ is symmetric matrix.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            The answer from @AOK is not generally true. Obviously for diagonal identical matrix $Lambda$ is valid only when $A$ is symmetric matrix.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Jan 12 at 22:22









                            BigFOX IBigFOX I

                            11




                            11






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1697991%2fdo-diagonal-matrices-always-commute%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Mario Kart Wii

                                Partial Derivative Guidance.

                                Understanding the size os this class of aleatory events