Different dimensions with shift and xshift












9















I discovered that there is a different default dimension in shift and xshift.



Consider the following mwe



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
node (a) at (0,3) {a};
node (b) at (0,2) {b};
node (c) at (0,1) {c};
node (d) at (0,0) {d};
node[xshift=5cm] at (a) {aa};
node[shift={(5cm,0)}] at (b) {bb};
node[xshift=5] at (c) {cc};
node[shift={(5,0)}] at (d) {dd};
draw[help lines] (0,0) grid (5,3) ;
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


It gives the following result:
enter image description here



For the two first lines given with 'cm' (a and b), the behavior of shift and xshift is the same.



But without dimensions (c and d) , it seems that shift uses default tikz dimensions, while xshift seems to use point?



I noticed that in the manual xshift is always given with cm, but this behavior is not explained.



Am I doing something incorrect? Is it a bug or a feature?










share|improve this question


















  • 2





    You're not doing anything incorrect, and this has been noticed before. Another situation in which the default unit is cm is a cricle, so draw (0,0) circle(1); gives you a circle of radius 1cm, similarly for arcs. As you have noticed, this is also true for coordinates, so at (1,0) and at (1cm,0) are equivalent. That's why the shift={(5,0)} and shift={(5cm,0)} can be used interchangedly. But for "most" other situations the default unit is pt.

    – marmot
    Jan 13 at 1:05













  • I can understand that commands doing completely different actions have different default dimensions. But shift and xshift seem very close, at least in terms of functionality. And this difference in behavior is really confusing...

    – Alain Merigot
    Jan 13 at 1:14













  • I agree it is confusing. But in my list of confusing things this is below the confusion which library one has to load to make an example from the pgfmanual run through. (And I would like to draw your attention to this source of confusion, which confuses me, too. ;-)

    – marmot
    Jan 13 at 1:17
















9















I discovered that there is a different default dimension in shift and xshift.



Consider the following mwe



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
node (a) at (0,3) {a};
node (b) at (0,2) {b};
node (c) at (0,1) {c};
node (d) at (0,0) {d};
node[xshift=5cm] at (a) {aa};
node[shift={(5cm,0)}] at (b) {bb};
node[xshift=5] at (c) {cc};
node[shift={(5,0)}] at (d) {dd};
draw[help lines] (0,0) grid (5,3) ;
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


It gives the following result:
enter image description here



For the two first lines given with 'cm' (a and b), the behavior of shift and xshift is the same.



But without dimensions (c and d) , it seems that shift uses default tikz dimensions, while xshift seems to use point?



I noticed that in the manual xshift is always given with cm, but this behavior is not explained.



Am I doing something incorrect? Is it a bug or a feature?










share|improve this question


















  • 2





    You're not doing anything incorrect, and this has been noticed before. Another situation in which the default unit is cm is a cricle, so draw (0,0) circle(1); gives you a circle of radius 1cm, similarly for arcs. As you have noticed, this is also true for coordinates, so at (1,0) and at (1cm,0) are equivalent. That's why the shift={(5,0)} and shift={(5cm,0)} can be used interchangedly. But for "most" other situations the default unit is pt.

    – marmot
    Jan 13 at 1:05













  • I can understand that commands doing completely different actions have different default dimensions. But shift and xshift seem very close, at least in terms of functionality. And this difference in behavior is really confusing...

    – Alain Merigot
    Jan 13 at 1:14













  • I agree it is confusing. But in my list of confusing things this is below the confusion which library one has to load to make an example from the pgfmanual run through. (And I would like to draw your attention to this source of confusion, which confuses me, too. ;-)

    – marmot
    Jan 13 at 1:17














9












9








9








I discovered that there is a different default dimension in shift and xshift.



Consider the following mwe



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
node (a) at (0,3) {a};
node (b) at (0,2) {b};
node (c) at (0,1) {c};
node (d) at (0,0) {d};
node[xshift=5cm] at (a) {aa};
node[shift={(5cm,0)}] at (b) {bb};
node[xshift=5] at (c) {cc};
node[shift={(5,0)}] at (d) {dd};
draw[help lines] (0,0) grid (5,3) ;
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


It gives the following result:
enter image description here



For the two first lines given with 'cm' (a and b), the behavior of shift and xshift is the same.



But without dimensions (c and d) , it seems that shift uses default tikz dimensions, while xshift seems to use point?



I noticed that in the manual xshift is always given with cm, but this behavior is not explained.



Am I doing something incorrect? Is it a bug or a feature?










share|improve this question














I discovered that there is a different default dimension in shift and xshift.



Consider the following mwe



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
node (a) at (0,3) {a};
node (b) at (0,2) {b};
node (c) at (0,1) {c};
node (d) at (0,0) {d};
node[xshift=5cm] at (a) {aa};
node[shift={(5cm,0)}] at (b) {bb};
node[xshift=5] at (c) {cc};
node[shift={(5,0)}] at (d) {dd};
draw[help lines] (0,0) grid (5,3) ;
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


It gives the following result:
enter image description here



For the two first lines given with 'cm' (a and b), the behavior of shift and xshift is the same.



But without dimensions (c and d) , it seems that shift uses default tikz dimensions, while xshift seems to use point?



I noticed that in the manual xshift is always given with cm, but this behavior is not explained.



Am I doing something incorrect? Is it a bug or a feature?







tikz-pgf






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jan 13 at 1:00









Alain MerigotAlain Merigot

1834




1834








  • 2





    You're not doing anything incorrect, and this has been noticed before. Another situation in which the default unit is cm is a cricle, so draw (0,0) circle(1); gives you a circle of radius 1cm, similarly for arcs. As you have noticed, this is also true for coordinates, so at (1,0) and at (1cm,0) are equivalent. That's why the shift={(5,0)} and shift={(5cm,0)} can be used interchangedly. But for "most" other situations the default unit is pt.

    – marmot
    Jan 13 at 1:05













  • I can understand that commands doing completely different actions have different default dimensions. But shift and xshift seem very close, at least in terms of functionality. And this difference in behavior is really confusing...

    – Alain Merigot
    Jan 13 at 1:14













  • I agree it is confusing. But in my list of confusing things this is below the confusion which library one has to load to make an example from the pgfmanual run through. (And I would like to draw your attention to this source of confusion, which confuses me, too. ;-)

    – marmot
    Jan 13 at 1:17














  • 2





    You're not doing anything incorrect, and this has been noticed before. Another situation in which the default unit is cm is a cricle, so draw (0,0) circle(1); gives you a circle of radius 1cm, similarly for arcs. As you have noticed, this is also true for coordinates, so at (1,0) and at (1cm,0) are equivalent. That's why the shift={(5,0)} and shift={(5cm,0)} can be used interchangedly. But for "most" other situations the default unit is pt.

    – marmot
    Jan 13 at 1:05













  • I can understand that commands doing completely different actions have different default dimensions. But shift and xshift seem very close, at least in terms of functionality. And this difference in behavior is really confusing...

    – Alain Merigot
    Jan 13 at 1:14













  • I agree it is confusing. But in my list of confusing things this is below the confusion which library one has to load to make an example from the pgfmanual run through. (And I would like to draw your attention to this source of confusion, which confuses me, too. ;-)

    – marmot
    Jan 13 at 1:17








2




2





You're not doing anything incorrect, and this has been noticed before. Another situation in which the default unit is cm is a cricle, so draw (0,0) circle(1); gives you a circle of radius 1cm, similarly for arcs. As you have noticed, this is also true for coordinates, so at (1,0) and at (1cm,0) are equivalent. That's why the shift={(5,0)} and shift={(5cm,0)} can be used interchangedly. But for "most" other situations the default unit is pt.

– marmot
Jan 13 at 1:05







You're not doing anything incorrect, and this has been noticed before. Another situation in which the default unit is cm is a cricle, so draw (0,0) circle(1); gives you a circle of radius 1cm, similarly for arcs. As you have noticed, this is also true for coordinates, so at (1,0) and at (1cm,0) are equivalent. That's why the shift={(5,0)} and shift={(5cm,0)} can be used interchangedly. But for "most" other situations the default unit is pt.

– marmot
Jan 13 at 1:05















I can understand that commands doing completely different actions have different default dimensions. But shift and xshift seem very close, at least in terms of functionality. And this difference in behavior is really confusing...

– Alain Merigot
Jan 13 at 1:14







I can understand that commands doing completely different actions have different default dimensions. But shift and xshift seem very close, at least in terms of functionality. And this difference in behavior is really confusing...

– Alain Merigot
Jan 13 at 1:14















I agree it is confusing. But in my list of confusing things this is below the confusion which library one has to load to make an example from the pgfmanual run through. (And I would like to draw your attention to this source of confusion, which confuses me, too. ;-)

– marmot
Jan 13 at 1:17





I agree it is confusing. But in my list of confusing things this is below the confusion which library one has to load to make an example from the pgfmanual run through. (And I would like to draw your attention to this source of confusion, which confuses me, too. ;-)

– marmot
Jan 13 at 1:17










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















8














In TikZ always the default unit for length values is pt. And we have




/tikz/xshift=<dimension>




So the default unit for xshift is pt.



In (1,0) you can think of cm as default unit but there is no default unit. Simply (1,0) is 1.x+0.y so it depends on the value of the x vector, which is initially set to (1cm,0).






share|improve this answer


























  • If "In TikZ always the default unit for length values is pt. " is really always true, why doesn't it apply to radii and the like? Or is in your opinion a radius not a length unit?

    – marmot
    Jan 13 at 4:45











  • The manual is slightly more subtle. For the coordinates, it defines unit vectors (x-vector, y-vector and z-vector) which have by default a length of 1 cm. See page 366 of manual 3.1

    – AndréC
    Jan 13 at 8:02











  • @marmot circle(1) is the same as circle[radius=1] which is the same as circle[x radius=1,y radius=1] which is the ellipse that goes throw the points +x-vector and +y-vector. You can check this with circle[x={(1,1)},radius=1]. In the manual radius is not a dimension but a value because it can be dimension or factor.

    – Kpym
    Jan 13 at 10:04











  • Well, I disagree. This is all under the question "Different dimensions with shift and xshift". My take is that the OP is wondering that, if they use dimensionless numbers, dimensions will be appended and they are different in different contexts. I agree with this observation and give another example in which cm get appended. If it was always a factor, why would draw (0,0) circle (1cm); work.

    – marmot
    Jan 13 at 15:06





















5














Some thoughts:




  • You're not doing anything incorrect.

  • Is it a bug? It is not a bug in the sense that the program crashes or that the result deviates from what one may expect from the manual. So my take it is not a bug.

  • The default unit for coordinates is cm, so at (1,0) and at (1cm,0) are equivalent. That's why the shift={(5,0)} and shift={(5cm,0)} can be used interchangedly.

  • Is this not the only situation where cm is the unit. Another situation in which the default unit is cm is a cricle, so draw (0,0) circle(1); gives you a circle of radius 1cm, similarly for arcs.

  • But for "most" other situations the default unit is pt.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    marmot, see Kpym's answer, pt is the default unit for length.

    – CarLaTeX
    Jan 13 at 4:38











  • @CarLaTeX Well, depends on how you define default unit. From the OP's post I thought their definition is what is inserted when you do not specify the unit. If you adopt this definition, it is not the case for, say, circles and arcs. I would even make the stronger statement that, in view of the behavior of circles etc., the statement "In TikZ always the default unit for length values is pt." is not entirely correct. What is a radius if not a length (scale)?

    – marmot
    Jan 13 at 4:40













  • I don't know, maybe it is considered a sort of polar coordinate.

    – CarLaTeX
    Jan 13 at 5:28











  • @CarLaTeX Yes, sure. I really thin it boils down how you interpret "I discovered that there is a different default dimension in shift and xshift.". My interpretation is that the question concerns the observation that, if you do not specify the dimensions, TikZ will insert some for you, and the dimension TikZ inserts depends on the context. All I am saying is that this is true, and that the dimension automatically inserted in the case of a circle is also cm, whereas it is pt for most other situations.

    – marmot
    Jan 13 at 5:33











  • The syntax draw (0,0) circle (1) is an old syntax that still works but is deprecated. tex.stackexchange.com/q/303130/138900

    – AndréC
    Jan 13 at 7:57





















2














An example that ilustrate @Kpym's nice answer.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}

begin{tikzpicture}
draw[help lines] (0,0) grid (5,3) ;
node (a) at (0,3) {a};
node (b) at (0,2) {b};
node (c) at (0,1) {c};
node (d) at (0,0) {d};
begin{scope}[x={(2,1)}] % change the vector x
node[xshift=2cm] at (a) {aa}; % 2cm to the right
node[shift={(2cm,0)}] at (b) {bb}; % 2cm to the right and 0pt to the top
node[xshift=2] at (c) {cc}; % 2pt to the right
node[shift={(2,0)}] at (d) {dd}; % 2x+0y
draw[blue] circle[radius=0.5]; % 0.5 is interpreted as xradius =0.5x and yradius =0.5 y
draw[red] circle[radius=0.5cm]; % .0.5cm is interpreted as xradius=yradius=0.5cm

end{scope}
end{tikzpicture}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469893%2fdifferent-dimensions-with-shift-and-xshift%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8














    In TikZ always the default unit for length values is pt. And we have




    /tikz/xshift=<dimension>




    So the default unit for xshift is pt.



    In (1,0) you can think of cm as default unit but there is no default unit. Simply (1,0) is 1.x+0.y so it depends on the value of the x vector, which is initially set to (1cm,0).






    share|improve this answer


























    • If "In TikZ always the default unit for length values is pt. " is really always true, why doesn't it apply to radii and the like? Or is in your opinion a radius not a length unit?

      – marmot
      Jan 13 at 4:45











    • The manual is slightly more subtle. For the coordinates, it defines unit vectors (x-vector, y-vector and z-vector) which have by default a length of 1 cm. See page 366 of manual 3.1

      – AndréC
      Jan 13 at 8:02











    • @marmot circle(1) is the same as circle[radius=1] which is the same as circle[x radius=1,y radius=1] which is the ellipse that goes throw the points +x-vector and +y-vector. You can check this with circle[x={(1,1)},radius=1]. In the manual radius is not a dimension but a value because it can be dimension or factor.

      – Kpym
      Jan 13 at 10:04











    • Well, I disagree. This is all under the question "Different dimensions with shift and xshift". My take is that the OP is wondering that, if they use dimensionless numbers, dimensions will be appended and they are different in different contexts. I agree with this observation and give another example in which cm get appended. If it was always a factor, why would draw (0,0) circle (1cm); work.

      – marmot
      Jan 13 at 15:06


















    8














    In TikZ always the default unit for length values is pt. And we have




    /tikz/xshift=<dimension>




    So the default unit for xshift is pt.



    In (1,0) you can think of cm as default unit but there is no default unit. Simply (1,0) is 1.x+0.y so it depends on the value of the x vector, which is initially set to (1cm,0).






    share|improve this answer


























    • If "In TikZ always the default unit for length values is pt. " is really always true, why doesn't it apply to radii and the like? Or is in your opinion a radius not a length unit?

      – marmot
      Jan 13 at 4:45











    • The manual is slightly more subtle. For the coordinates, it defines unit vectors (x-vector, y-vector and z-vector) which have by default a length of 1 cm. See page 366 of manual 3.1

      – AndréC
      Jan 13 at 8:02











    • @marmot circle(1) is the same as circle[radius=1] which is the same as circle[x radius=1,y radius=1] which is the ellipse that goes throw the points +x-vector and +y-vector. You can check this with circle[x={(1,1)},radius=1]. In the manual radius is not a dimension but a value because it can be dimension or factor.

      – Kpym
      Jan 13 at 10:04











    • Well, I disagree. This is all under the question "Different dimensions with shift and xshift". My take is that the OP is wondering that, if they use dimensionless numbers, dimensions will be appended and they are different in different contexts. I agree with this observation and give another example in which cm get appended. If it was always a factor, why would draw (0,0) circle (1cm); work.

      – marmot
      Jan 13 at 15:06
















    8












    8








    8







    In TikZ always the default unit for length values is pt. And we have




    /tikz/xshift=<dimension>




    So the default unit for xshift is pt.



    In (1,0) you can think of cm as default unit but there is no default unit. Simply (1,0) is 1.x+0.y so it depends on the value of the x vector, which is initially set to (1cm,0).






    share|improve this answer















    In TikZ always the default unit for length values is pt. And we have




    /tikz/xshift=<dimension>




    So the default unit for xshift is pt.



    In (1,0) you can think of cm as default unit but there is no default unit. Simply (1,0) is 1.x+0.y so it depends on the value of the x vector, which is initially set to (1cm,0).







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jan 13 at 2:52

























    answered Jan 13 at 2:41









    KpymKpym

    16k23987




    16k23987













    • If "In TikZ always the default unit for length values is pt. " is really always true, why doesn't it apply to radii and the like? Or is in your opinion a radius not a length unit?

      – marmot
      Jan 13 at 4:45











    • The manual is slightly more subtle. For the coordinates, it defines unit vectors (x-vector, y-vector and z-vector) which have by default a length of 1 cm. See page 366 of manual 3.1

      – AndréC
      Jan 13 at 8:02











    • @marmot circle(1) is the same as circle[radius=1] which is the same as circle[x radius=1,y radius=1] which is the ellipse that goes throw the points +x-vector and +y-vector. You can check this with circle[x={(1,1)},radius=1]. In the manual radius is not a dimension but a value because it can be dimension or factor.

      – Kpym
      Jan 13 at 10:04











    • Well, I disagree. This is all under the question "Different dimensions with shift and xshift". My take is that the OP is wondering that, if they use dimensionless numbers, dimensions will be appended and they are different in different contexts. I agree with this observation and give another example in which cm get appended. If it was always a factor, why would draw (0,0) circle (1cm); work.

      – marmot
      Jan 13 at 15:06





















    • If "In TikZ always the default unit for length values is pt. " is really always true, why doesn't it apply to radii and the like? Or is in your opinion a radius not a length unit?

      – marmot
      Jan 13 at 4:45











    • The manual is slightly more subtle. For the coordinates, it defines unit vectors (x-vector, y-vector and z-vector) which have by default a length of 1 cm. See page 366 of manual 3.1

      – AndréC
      Jan 13 at 8:02











    • @marmot circle(1) is the same as circle[radius=1] which is the same as circle[x radius=1,y radius=1] which is the ellipse that goes throw the points +x-vector and +y-vector. You can check this with circle[x={(1,1)},radius=1]. In the manual radius is not a dimension but a value because it can be dimension or factor.

      – Kpym
      Jan 13 at 10:04











    • Well, I disagree. This is all under the question "Different dimensions with shift and xshift". My take is that the OP is wondering that, if they use dimensionless numbers, dimensions will be appended and they are different in different contexts. I agree with this observation and give another example in which cm get appended. If it was always a factor, why would draw (0,0) circle (1cm); work.

      – marmot
      Jan 13 at 15:06



















    If "In TikZ always the default unit for length values is pt. " is really always true, why doesn't it apply to radii and the like? Or is in your opinion a radius not a length unit?

    – marmot
    Jan 13 at 4:45





    If "In TikZ always the default unit for length values is pt. " is really always true, why doesn't it apply to radii and the like? Or is in your opinion a radius not a length unit?

    – marmot
    Jan 13 at 4:45













    The manual is slightly more subtle. For the coordinates, it defines unit vectors (x-vector, y-vector and z-vector) which have by default a length of 1 cm. See page 366 of manual 3.1

    – AndréC
    Jan 13 at 8:02





    The manual is slightly more subtle. For the coordinates, it defines unit vectors (x-vector, y-vector and z-vector) which have by default a length of 1 cm. See page 366 of manual 3.1

    – AndréC
    Jan 13 at 8:02













    @marmot circle(1) is the same as circle[radius=1] which is the same as circle[x radius=1,y radius=1] which is the ellipse that goes throw the points +x-vector and +y-vector. You can check this with circle[x={(1,1)},radius=1]. In the manual radius is not a dimension but a value because it can be dimension or factor.

    – Kpym
    Jan 13 at 10:04





    @marmot circle(1) is the same as circle[radius=1] which is the same as circle[x radius=1,y radius=1] which is the ellipse that goes throw the points +x-vector and +y-vector. You can check this with circle[x={(1,1)},radius=1]. In the manual radius is not a dimension but a value because it can be dimension or factor.

    – Kpym
    Jan 13 at 10:04













    Well, I disagree. This is all under the question "Different dimensions with shift and xshift". My take is that the OP is wondering that, if they use dimensionless numbers, dimensions will be appended and they are different in different contexts. I agree with this observation and give another example in which cm get appended. If it was always a factor, why would draw (0,0) circle (1cm); work.

    – marmot
    Jan 13 at 15:06







    Well, I disagree. This is all under the question "Different dimensions with shift and xshift". My take is that the OP is wondering that, if they use dimensionless numbers, dimensions will be appended and they are different in different contexts. I agree with this observation and give another example in which cm get appended. If it was always a factor, why would draw (0,0) circle (1cm); work.

    – marmot
    Jan 13 at 15:06













    5














    Some thoughts:




    • You're not doing anything incorrect.

    • Is it a bug? It is not a bug in the sense that the program crashes or that the result deviates from what one may expect from the manual. So my take it is not a bug.

    • The default unit for coordinates is cm, so at (1,0) and at (1cm,0) are equivalent. That's why the shift={(5,0)} and shift={(5cm,0)} can be used interchangedly.

    • Is this not the only situation where cm is the unit. Another situation in which the default unit is cm is a cricle, so draw (0,0) circle(1); gives you a circle of radius 1cm, similarly for arcs.

    • But for "most" other situations the default unit is pt.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      marmot, see Kpym's answer, pt is the default unit for length.

      – CarLaTeX
      Jan 13 at 4:38











    • @CarLaTeX Well, depends on how you define default unit. From the OP's post I thought their definition is what is inserted when you do not specify the unit. If you adopt this definition, it is not the case for, say, circles and arcs. I would even make the stronger statement that, in view of the behavior of circles etc., the statement "In TikZ always the default unit for length values is pt." is not entirely correct. What is a radius if not a length (scale)?

      – marmot
      Jan 13 at 4:40













    • I don't know, maybe it is considered a sort of polar coordinate.

      – CarLaTeX
      Jan 13 at 5:28











    • @CarLaTeX Yes, sure. I really thin it boils down how you interpret "I discovered that there is a different default dimension in shift and xshift.". My interpretation is that the question concerns the observation that, if you do not specify the dimensions, TikZ will insert some for you, and the dimension TikZ inserts depends on the context. All I am saying is that this is true, and that the dimension automatically inserted in the case of a circle is also cm, whereas it is pt for most other situations.

      – marmot
      Jan 13 at 5:33











    • The syntax draw (0,0) circle (1) is an old syntax that still works but is deprecated. tex.stackexchange.com/q/303130/138900

      – AndréC
      Jan 13 at 7:57


















    5














    Some thoughts:




    • You're not doing anything incorrect.

    • Is it a bug? It is not a bug in the sense that the program crashes or that the result deviates from what one may expect from the manual. So my take it is not a bug.

    • The default unit for coordinates is cm, so at (1,0) and at (1cm,0) are equivalent. That's why the shift={(5,0)} and shift={(5cm,0)} can be used interchangedly.

    • Is this not the only situation where cm is the unit. Another situation in which the default unit is cm is a cricle, so draw (0,0) circle(1); gives you a circle of radius 1cm, similarly for arcs.

    • But for "most" other situations the default unit is pt.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      marmot, see Kpym's answer, pt is the default unit for length.

      – CarLaTeX
      Jan 13 at 4:38











    • @CarLaTeX Well, depends on how you define default unit. From the OP's post I thought their definition is what is inserted when you do not specify the unit. If you adopt this definition, it is not the case for, say, circles and arcs. I would even make the stronger statement that, in view of the behavior of circles etc., the statement "In TikZ always the default unit for length values is pt." is not entirely correct. What is a radius if not a length (scale)?

      – marmot
      Jan 13 at 4:40













    • I don't know, maybe it is considered a sort of polar coordinate.

      – CarLaTeX
      Jan 13 at 5:28











    • @CarLaTeX Yes, sure. I really thin it boils down how you interpret "I discovered that there is a different default dimension in shift and xshift.". My interpretation is that the question concerns the observation that, if you do not specify the dimensions, TikZ will insert some for you, and the dimension TikZ inserts depends on the context. All I am saying is that this is true, and that the dimension automatically inserted in the case of a circle is also cm, whereas it is pt for most other situations.

      – marmot
      Jan 13 at 5:33











    • The syntax draw (0,0) circle (1) is an old syntax that still works but is deprecated. tex.stackexchange.com/q/303130/138900

      – AndréC
      Jan 13 at 7:57
















    5












    5








    5







    Some thoughts:




    • You're not doing anything incorrect.

    • Is it a bug? It is not a bug in the sense that the program crashes or that the result deviates from what one may expect from the manual. So my take it is not a bug.

    • The default unit for coordinates is cm, so at (1,0) and at (1cm,0) are equivalent. That's why the shift={(5,0)} and shift={(5cm,0)} can be used interchangedly.

    • Is this not the only situation where cm is the unit. Another situation in which the default unit is cm is a cricle, so draw (0,0) circle(1); gives you a circle of radius 1cm, similarly for arcs.

    • But for "most" other situations the default unit is pt.






    share|improve this answer













    Some thoughts:




    • You're not doing anything incorrect.

    • Is it a bug? It is not a bug in the sense that the program crashes or that the result deviates from what one may expect from the manual. So my take it is not a bug.

    • The default unit for coordinates is cm, so at (1,0) and at (1cm,0) are equivalent. That's why the shift={(5,0)} and shift={(5cm,0)} can be used interchangedly.

    • Is this not the only situation where cm is the unit. Another situation in which the default unit is cm is a cricle, so draw (0,0) circle(1); gives you a circle of radius 1cm, similarly for arcs.

    • But for "most" other situations the default unit is pt.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Jan 13 at 1:33









    marmotmarmot

    95.1k4110210




    95.1k4110210








    • 1





      marmot, see Kpym's answer, pt is the default unit for length.

      – CarLaTeX
      Jan 13 at 4:38











    • @CarLaTeX Well, depends on how you define default unit. From the OP's post I thought their definition is what is inserted when you do not specify the unit. If you adopt this definition, it is not the case for, say, circles and arcs. I would even make the stronger statement that, in view of the behavior of circles etc., the statement "In TikZ always the default unit for length values is pt." is not entirely correct. What is a radius if not a length (scale)?

      – marmot
      Jan 13 at 4:40













    • I don't know, maybe it is considered a sort of polar coordinate.

      – CarLaTeX
      Jan 13 at 5:28











    • @CarLaTeX Yes, sure. I really thin it boils down how you interpret "I discovered that there is a different default dimension in shift and xshift.". My interpretation is that the question concerns the observation that, if you do not specify the dimensions, TikZ will insert some for you, and the dimension TikZ inserts depends on the context. All I am saying is that this is true, and that the dimension automatically inserted in the case of a circle is also cm, whereas it is pt for most other situations.

      – marmot
      Jan 13 at 5:33











    • The syntax draw (0,0) circle (1) is an old syntax that still works but is deprecated. tex.stackexchange.com/q/303130/138900

      – AndréC
      Jan 13 at 7:57
















    • 1





      marmot, see Kpym's answer, pt is the default unit for length.

      – CarLaTeX
      Jan 13 at 4:38











    • @CarLaTeX Well, depends on how you define default unit. From the OP's post I thought their definition is what is inserted when you do not specify the unit. If you adopt this definition, it is not the case for, say, circles and arcs. I would even make the stronger statement that, in view of the behavior of circles etc., the statement "In TikZ always the default unit for length values is pt." is not entirely correct. What is a radius if not a length (scale)?

      – marmot
      Jan 13 at 4:40













    • I don't know, maybe it is considered a sort of polar coordinate.

      – CarLaTeX
      Jan 13 at 5:28











    • @CarLaTeX Yes, sure. I really thin it boils down how you interpret "I discovered that there is a different default dimension in shift and xshift.". My interpretation is that the question concerns the observation that, if you do not specify the dimensions, TikZ will insert some for you, and the dimension TikZ inserts depends on the context. All I am saying is that this is true, and that the dimension automatically inserted in the case of a circle is also cm, whereas it is pt for most other situations.

      – marmot
      Jan 13 at 5:33











    • The syntax draw (0,0) circle (1) is an old syntax that still works but is deprecated. tex.stackexchange.com/q/303130/138900

      – AndréC
      Jan 13 at 7:57










    1




    1





    marmot, see Kpym's answer, pt is the default unit for length.

    – CarLaTeX
    Jan 13 at 4:38





    marmot, see Kpym's answer, pt is the default unit for length.

    – CarLaTeX
    Jan 13 at 4:38













    @CarLaTeX Well, depends on how you define default unit. From the OP's post I thought their definition is what is inserted when you do not specify the unit. If you adopt this definition, it is not the case for, say, circles and arcs. I would even make the stronger statement that, in view of the behavior of circles etc., the statement "In TikZ always the default unit for length values is pt." is not entirely correct. What is a radius if not a length (scale)?

    – marmot
    Jan 13 at 4:40







    @CarLaTeX Well, depends on how you define default unit. From the OP's post I thought their definition is what is inserted when you do not specify the unit. If you adopt this definition, it is not the case for, say, circles and arcs. I would even make the stronger statement that, in view of the behavior of circles etc., the statement "In TikZ always the default unit for length values is pt." is not entirely correct. What is a radius if not a length (scale)?

    – marmot
    Jan 13 at 4:40















    I don't know, maybe it is considered a sort of polar coordinate.

    – CarLaTeX
    Jan 13 at 5:28





    I don't know, maybe it is considered a sort of polar coordinate.

    – CarLaTeX
    Jan 13 at 5:28













    @CarLaTeX Yes, sure. I really thin it boils down how you interpret "I discovered that there is a different default dimension in shift and xshift.". My interpretation is that the question concerns the observation that, if you do not specify the dimensions, TikZ will insert some for you, and the dimension TikZ inserts depends on the context. All I am saying is that this is true, and that the dimension automatically inserted in the case of a circle is also cm, whereas it is pt for most other situations.

    – marmot
    Jan 13 at 5:33





    @CarLaTeX Yes, sure. I really thin it boils down how you interpret "I discovered that there is a different default dimension in shift and xshift.". My interpretation is that the question concerns the observation that, if you do not specify the dimensions, TikZ will insert some for you, and the dimension TikZ inserts depends on the context. All I am saying is that this is true, and that the dimension automatically inserted in the case of a circle is also cm, whereas it is pt for most other situations.

    – marmot
    Jan 13 at 5:33













    The syntax draw (0,0) circle (1) is an old syntax that still works but is deprecated. tex.stackexchange.com/q/303130/138900

    – AndréC
    Jan 13 at 7:57







    The syntax draw (0,0) circle (1) is an old syntax that still works but is deprecated. tex.stackexchange.com/q/303130/138900

    – AndréC
    Jan 13 at 7:57













    2














    An example that ilustrate @Kpym's nice answer.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{tikz}
    begin{document}

    begin{tikzpicture}
    draw[help lines] (0,0) grid (5,3) ;
    node (a) at (0,3) {a};
    node (b) at (0,2) {b};
    node (c) at (0,1) {c};
    node (d) at (0,0) {d};
    begin{scope}[x={(2,1)}] % change the vector x
    node[xshift=2cm] at (a) {aa}; % 2cm to the right
    node[shift={(2cm,0)}] at (b) {bb}; % 2cm to the right and 0pt to the top
    node[xshift=2] at (c) {cc}; % 2pt to the right
    node[shift={(2,0)}] at (d) {dd}; % 2x+0y
    draw[blue] circle[radius=0.5]; % 0.5 is interpreted as xradius =0.5x and yradius =0.5 y
    draw[red] circle[radius=0.5cm]; % .0.5cm is interpreted as xradius=yradius=0.5cm

    end{scope}
    end{tikzpicture}

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer






























      2














      An example that ilustrate @Kpym's nice answer.



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{tikz}
      begin{document}

      begin{tikzpicture}
      draw[help lines] (0,0) grid (5,3) ;
      node (a) at (0,3) {a};
      node (b) at (0,2) {b};
      node (c) at (0,1) {c};
      node (d) at (0,0) {d};
      begin{scope}[x={(2,1)}] % change the vector x
      node[xshift=2cm] at (a) {aa}; % 2cm to the right
      node[shift={(2cm,0)}] at (b) {bb}; % 2cm to the right and 0pt to the top
      node[xshift=2] at (c) {cc}; % 2pt to the right
      node[shift={(2,0)}] at (d) {dd}; % 2x+0y
      draw[blue] circle[radius=0.5]; % 0.5 is interpreted as xradius =0.5x and yradius =0.5 y
      draw[red] circle[radius=0.5cm]; % .0.5cm is interpreted as xradius=yradius=0.5cm

      end{scope}
      end{tikzpicture}

      end{document}


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer




























        2












        2








        2







        An example that ilustrate @Kpym's nice answer.



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{tikz}
        begin{document}

        begin{tikzpicture}
        draw[help lines] (0,0) grid (5,3) ;
        node (a) at (0,3) {a};
        node (b) at (0,2) {b};
        node (c) at (0,1) {c};
        node (d) at (0,0) {d};
        begin{scope}[x={(2,1)}] % change the vector x
        node[xshift=2cm] at (a) {aa}; % 2cm to the right
        node[shift={(2cm,0)}] at (b) {bb}; % 2cm to the right and 0pt to the top
        node[xshift=2] at (c) {cc}; % 2pt to the right
        node[shift={(2,0)}] at (d) {dd}; % 2x+0y
        draw[blue] circle[radius=0.5]; % 0.5 is interpreted as xradius =0.5x and yradius =0.5 y
        draw[red] circle[radius=0.5cm]; % .0.5cm is interpreted as xradius=yradius=0.5cm

        end{scope}
        end{tikzpicture}

        end{document}


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer















        An example that ilustrate @Kpym's nice answer.



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{tikz}
        begin{document}

        begin{tikzpicture}
        draw[help lines] (0,0) grid (5,3) ;
        node (a) at (0,3) {a};
        node (b) at (0,2) {b};
        node (c) at (0,1) {c};
        node (d) at (0,0) {d};
        begin{scope}[x={(2,1)}] % change the vector x
        node[xshift=2cm] at (a) {aa}; % 2cm to the right
        node[shift={(2cm,0)}] at (b) {bb}; % 2cm to the right and 0pt to the top
        node[xshift=2] at (c) {cc}; % 2pt to the right
        node[shift={(2,0)}] at (d) {dd}; % 2x+0y
        draw[blue] circle[radius=0.5]; % 0.5 is interpreted as xradius =0.5x and yradius =0.5 y
        draw[red] circle[radius=0.5cm]; % .0.5cm is interpreted as xradius=yradius=0.5cm

        end{scope}
        end{tikzpicture}

        end{document}


        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Jan 13 at 7:23

























        answered Jan 13 at 7:16









        Hafid BoukhouldaHafid Boukhoulda

        2,5371519




        2,5371519






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469893%2fdifferent-dimensions-with-shift-and-xshift%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Mario Kart Wii

            What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

            Antonio Litta Visconti Arese