How do you simplify $3^{frac{(-1)^n + 1}{2}}$












3












$begingroup$


I am solving non linear recursive relations and I stumbled upon this: $$x(n)*x(n+1)=3, x(0)=3$$
If you start calculating the values after $0$ you will notice that a pattern emerges: $$x(0) = 3$$ $$x(1) = 1$$ $$x(2) = 3$$ $$x(3) = 1$$ $$...$$
From this I concluded that $x(n) = (-1)^n + 2$



BUT! If you try to solve the problem more conservatively you will convert the relation to a linear one:
$log_{3} (x(n)) + log_{3}(x(n+1)) = 1$ $Set g(n)=log_{3}(x(n)), g(0) = log_{3}(x(0))=1$



$g(n+1) + g(n) = 1 Rightarrow g(n)=frac{1}{2}*(-1)^n + frac{1}{2} Rightarrow x(n) = 3^{frac{1}{2}*((-1)^n + 1)} $



The fact that $3^{frac{1}{2}*((-1)^n + 1)} = (-1)^n + 2$ can also be confirmed by graphing the two functions. My question is: is there a way to go from the one to the other instead of just proving that they are equal?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    I am solving non linear recursive relations and I stumbled upon this: $$x(n)*x(n+1)=3, x(0)=3$$
    If you start calculating the values after $0$ you will notice that a pattern emerges: $$x(0) = 3$$ $$x(1) = 1$$ $$x(2) = 3$$ $$x(3) = 1$$ $$...$$
    From this I concluded that $x(n) = (-1)^n + 2$



    BUT! If you try to solve the problem more conservatively you will convert the relation to a linear one:
    $log_{3} (x(n)) + log_{3}(x(n+1)) = 1$ $Set g(n)=log_{3}(x(n)), g(0) = log_{3}(x(0))=1$



    $g(n+1) + g(n) = 1 Rightarrow g(n)=frac{1}{2}*(-1)^n + frac{1}{2} Rightarrow x(n) = 3^{frac{1}{2}*((-1)^n + 1)} $



    The fact that $3^{frac{1}{2}*((-1)^n + 1)} = (-1)^n + 2$ can also be confirmed by graphing the two functions. My question is: is there a way to go from the one to the other instead of just proving that they are equal?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      I am solving non linear recursive relations and I stumbled upon this: $$x(n)*x(n+1)=3, x(0)=3$$
      If you start calculating the values after $0$ you will notice that a pattern emerges: $$x(0) = 3$$ $$x(1) = 1$$ $$x(2) = 3$$ $$x(3) = 1$$ $$...$$
      From this I concluded that $x(n) = (-1)^n + 2$



      BUT! If you try to solve the problem more conservatively you will convert the relation to a linear one:
      $log_{3} (x(n)) + log_{3}(x(n+1)) = 1$ $Set g(n)=log_{3}(x(n)), g(0) = log_{3}(x(0))=1$



      $g(n+1) + g(n) = 1 Rightarrow g(n)=frac{1}{2}*(-1)^n + frac{1}{2} Rightarrow x(n) = 3^{frac{1}{2}*((-1)^n + 1)} $



      The fact that $3^{frac{1}{2}*((-1)^n + 1)} = (-1)^n + 2$ can also be confirmed by graphing the two functions. My question is: is there a way to go from the one to the other instead of just proving that they are equal?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I am solving non linear recursive relations and I stumbled upon this: $$x(n)*x(n+1)=3, x(0)=3$$
      If you start calculating the values after $0$ you will notice that a pattern emerges: $$x(0) = 3$$ $$x(1) = 1$$ $$x(2) = 3$$ $$x(3) = 1$$ $$...$$
      From this I concluded that $x(n) = (-1)^n + 2$



      BUT! If you try to solve the problem more conservatively you will convert the relation to a linear one:
      $log_{3} (x(n)) + log_{3}(x(n+1)) = 1$ $Set g(n)=log_{3}(x(n)), g(0) = log_{3}(x(0))=1$



      $g(n+1) + g(n) = 1 Rightarrow g(n)=frac{1}{2}*(-1)^n + frac{1}{2} Rightarrow x(n) = 3^{frac{1}{2}*((-1)^n + 1)} $



      The fact that $3^{frac{1}{2}*((-1)^n + 1)} = (-1)^n + 2$ can also be confirmed by graphing the two functions. My question is: is there a way to go from the one to the other instead of just proving that they are equal?







      linear-algebra sequences-and-series recurrence-relations






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 13 at 3:52







      Mario Drouga

















      asked Jan 13 at 3:44









      Mario DrougaMario Drouga

      235




      235






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          You're not going to be able to manipulate one into the other because they're not the same function for non-integer input. For example, let $n = 1/2$ then



          $$ (-1)^{1/2} + 2 = 2 + i $$



          and



          $$ 3^{frac{(-1)^{1/2} + 1}2} = e^{frac{1 + i}{2}log 3} = 3^{1/2}[cos(tfrac{1}2log 3) + isin(tfrac{1}2log 3)] approx 1.47724 + 0.904296 i $$



          If you don't know a lot about complex numbers you're going to just have to take my word for now.



          Here's a simpler example:



          $$ cos(n pi) = (-1)^n $$



          for integer values of $n$. But $cos(frac12pi) = 0$ and $(-1)^{1/2} = i$.



          So if you have two functions that are equal for integer inputs but are unequal for non-integer inputs. At some point in "simplifying" you will want to use the fact that your inputs are integers. Here the property is that



          $$ (-1)^n = begin{cases} 1 & n text{ is even} \ -1 & n text{ is odd} end{cases}. $$



          And because $(-1)^n$ is in some sense defined based on whether or not $n$ is even or odd, in order to simplify, you're going to want to separate your computation into two cases: when $n$ is even and when $n$ is odd.



          Here when you separate the two cases it is easy to see that for even integers, both functions are equal to $3$ and for odd integers, equal to $1$. So they represent the same function on the integers.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you! Would graphing the functions and using the z axis as the complex plane reveal the trig function? am I only seeing the points are which cos goes through the RxR plane when I graph it as a real function?
            $endgroup$
            – Mario Drouga
            Jan 13 at 5:05






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Mario Possibly. Personally I find it easier to plot the real part and complex parts separately just in the xy-plane. For instance $(-1)^x = e^{x log(-1)} = e^{pi x i} = cos(pi x) + i sin(pi x)$. Converting $3^{frac{(-1)^x + 1}2}$ to a real and imaginary part will be a lot messier.
            $endgroup$
            – Trevor Gunn
            Jan 13 at 5:29



















          3












          $begingroup$

          This is of the same type of situation as saying that $2$ and $1 + 1$ are the same. They are different expressions for the same value.



          In your case, let $fleft(nright) = left(-1right)^n + 2$, for $n ge 0 text{ and } n in N$. For even values of $n$, the value is $1 + 2 = 3$ and for odd values of $n$, the value is $-1 + 3 = 1$.



          Similarly, let $hleft(nright) = 3^{frac{left(-1right)^n + 1}{2}}$. For $n$ being even here, the value of $left(-1right)^n = 1$, so the function becomes $3^{frac{left(1 + 1 right)}{2}} = 3^1 = 3$. With odd values of $n$, $left(-1right)^n = -1$, so the function becomes $3^{frac{left(-1 + 1right)}{2}} = 3^0 = 1$.



          As you can see, the $2$ functions always have the same value for all non-negative values of $n$. They are just different ways to express the set of results. However, I prefer $fleft(nright) = left(-1right)^n + 2$ as, to me at least, it's simpler to understand and use.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            You've proven that both functions are equal. Can you manipulate the form of function h(n) to get function f(n)?
            $endgroup$
            – Mario Drouga
            Jan 13 at 4:13










          • $begingroup$
            @MarioDrouga I'm not quite sure what you mean by "manipulate". How would you, for example, propose to "manipulate" $1 + 1$ to show it's the same as $2$?
            $endgroup$
            – John Omielan
            Jan 13 at 4:17












          • $begingroup$
            What if you haven't arrived to the solution of f(n)? Would you be able to simplify g(n) enough to get you to f(n)?
            $endgroup$
            – Mario Drouga
            Jan 13 at 4:19






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @MarioDrouga The most basic of "simplifications" are the numeric values themselves, just like $2$ is usually consider simpler than $1 + 1$. With the set of values you got, there are very many different ways to represent them, with you just using $2$. In general, don't worry about determining more than $1$ way to specify results, much less figuring out how to go directly from one to another. Instead, you would normally just try to find a relatively simple & straightforward way to represent your results & use this, with the understanding that it's not the one & only unique way to do it.
            $endgroup$
            – John Omielan
            Jan 13 at 4:22













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071679%2fhow-do-you-simplify-3-frac-1n-12%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4












          $begingroup$

          You're not going to be able to manipulate one into the other because they're not the same function for non-integer input. For example, let $n = 1/2$ then



          $$ (-1)^{1/2} + 2 = 2 + i $$



          and



          $$ 3^{frac{(-1)^{1/2} + 1}2} = e^{frac{1 + i}{2}log 3} = 3^{1/2}[cos(tfrac{1}2log 3) + isin(tfrac{1}2log 3)] approx 1.47724 + 0.904296 i $$



          If you don't know a lot about complex numbers you're going to just have to take my word for now.



          Here's a simpler example:



          $$ cos(n pi) = (-1)^n $$



          for integer values of $n$. But $cos(frac12pi) = 0$ and $(-1)^{1/2} = i$.



          So if you have two functions that are equal for integer inputs but are unequal for non-integer inputs. At some point in "simplifying" you will want to use the fact that your inputs are integers. Here the property is that



          $$ (-1)^n = begin{cases} 1 & n text{ is even} \ -1 & n text{ is odd} end{cases}. $$



          And because $(-1)^n$ is in some sense defined based on whether or not $n$ is even or odd, in order to simplify, you're going to want to separate your computation into two cases: when $n$ is even and when $n$ is odd.



          Here when you separate the two cases it is easy to see that for even integers, both functions are equal to $3$ and for odd integers, equal to $1$. So they represent the same function on the integers.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you! Would graphing the functions and using the z axis as the complex plane reveal the trig function? am I only seeing the points are which cos goes through the RxR plane when I graph it as a real function?
            $endgroup$
            – Mario Drouga
            Jan 13 at 5:05






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Mario Possibly. Personally I find it easier to plot the real part and complex parts separately just in the xy-plane. For instance $(-1)^x = e^{x log(-1)} = e^{pi x i} = cos(pi x) + i sin(pi x)$. Converting $3^{frac{(-1)^x + 1}2}$ to a real and imaginary part will be a lot messier.
            $endgroup$
            – Trevor Gunn
            Jan 13 at 5:29
















          4












          $begingroup$

          You're not going to be able to manipulate one into the other because they're not the same function for non-integer input. For example, let $n = 1/2$ then



          $$ (-1)^{1/2} + 2 = 2 + i $$



          and



          $$ 3^{frac{(-1)^{1/2} + 1}2} = e^{frac{1 + i}{2}log 3} = 3^{1/2}[cos(tfrac{1}2log 3) + isin(tfrac{1}2log 3)] approx 1.47724 + 0.904296 i $$



          If you don't know a lot about complex numbers you're going to just have to take my word for now.



          Here's a simpler example:



          $$ cos(n pi) = (-1)^n $$



          for integer values of $n$. But $cos(frac12pi) = 0$ and $(-1)^{1/2} = i$.



          So if you have two functions that are equal for integer inputs but are unequal for non-integer inputs. At some point in "simplifying" you will want to use the fact that your inputs are integers. Here the property is that



          $$ (-1)^n = begin{cases} 1 & n text{ is even} \ -1 & n text{ is odd} end{cases}. $$



          And because $(-1)^n$ is in some sense defined based on whether or not $n$ is even or odd, in order to simplify, you're going to want to separate your computation into two cases: when $n$ is even and when $n$ is odd.



          Here when you separate the two cases it is easy to see that for even integers, both functions are equal to $3$ and for odd integers, equal to $1$. So they represent the same function on the integers.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you! Would graphing the functions and using the z axis as the complex plane reveal the trig function? am I only seeing the points are which cos goes through the RxR plane when I graph it as a real function?
            $endgroup$
            – Mario Drouga
            Jan 13 at 5:05






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Mario Possibly. Personally I find it easier to plot the real part and complex parts separately just in the xy-plane. For instance $(-1)^x = e^{x log(-1)} = e^{pi x i} = cos(pi x) + i sin(pi x)$. Converting $3^{frac{(-1)^x + 1}2}$ to a real and imaginary part will be a lot messier.
            $endgroup$
            – Trevor Gunn
            Jan 13 at 5:29














          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          You're not going to be able to manipulate one into the other because they're not the same function for non-integer input. For example, let $n = 1/2$ then



          $$ (-1)^{1/2} + 2 = 2 + i $$



          and



          $$ 3^{frac{(-1)^{1/2} + 1}2} = e^{frac{1 + i}{2}log 3} = 3^{1/2}[cos(tfrac{1}2log 3) + isin(tfrac{1}2log 3)] approx 1.47724 + 0.904296 i $$



          If you don't know a lot about complex numbers you're going to just have to take my word for now.



          Here's a simpler example:



          $$ cos(n pi) = (-1)^n $$



          for integer values of $n$. But $cos(frac12pi) = 0$ and $(-1)^{1/2} = i$.



          So if you have two functions that are equal for integer inputs but are unequal for non-integer inputs. At some point in "simplifying" you will want to use the fact that your inputs are integers. Here the property is that



          $$ (-1)^n = begin{cases} 1 & n text{ is even} \ -1 & n text{ is odd} end{cases}. $$



          And because $(-1)^n$ is in some sense defined based on whether or not $n$ is even or odd, in order to simplify, you're going to want to separate your computation into two cases: when $n$ is even and when $n$ is odd.



          Here when you separate the two cases it is easy to see that for even integers, both functions are equal to $3$ and for odd integers, equal to $1$. So they represent the same function on the integers.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          You're not going to be able to manipulate one into the other because they're not the same function for non-integer input. For example, let $n = 1/2$ then



          $$ (-1)^{1/2} + 2 = 2 + i $$



          and



          $$ 3^{frac{(-1)^{1/2} + 1}2} = e^{frac{1 + i}{2}log 3} = 3^{1/2}[cos(tfrac{1}2log 3) + isin(tfrac{1}2log 3)] approx 1.47724 + 0.904296 i $$



          If you don't know a lot about complex numbers you're going to just have to take my word for now.



          Here's a simpler example:



          $$ cos(n pi) = (-1)^n $$



          for integer values of $n$. But $cos(frac12pi) = 0$ and $(-1)^{1/2} = i$.



          So if you have two functions that are equal for integer inputs but are unequal for non-integer inputs. At some point in "simplifying" you will want to use the fact that your inputs are integers. Here the property is that



          $$ (-1)^n = begin{cases} 1 & n text{ is even} \ -1 & n text{ is odd} end{cases}. $$



          And because $(-1)^n$ is in some sense defined based on whether or not $n$ is even or odd, in order to simplify, you're going to want to separate your computation into two cases: when $n$ is even and when $n$ is odd.



          Here when you separate the two cases it is easy to see that for even integers, both functions are equal to $3$ and for odd integers, equal to $1$. So they represent the same function on the integers.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 13 at 4:33









          Trevor GunnTrevor Gunn

          14.4k32046




          14.4k32046












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you! Would graphing the functions and using the z axis as the complex plane reveal the trig function? am I only seeing the points are which cos goes through the RxR plane when I graph it as a real function?
            $endgroup$
            – Mario Drouga
            Jan 13 at 5:05






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Mario Possibly. Personally I find it easier to plot the real part and complex parts separately just in the xy-plane. For instance $(-1)^x = e^{x log(-1)} = e^{pi x i} = cos(pi x) + i sin(pi x)$. Converting $3^{frac{(-1)^x + 1}2}$ to a real and imaginary part will be a lot messier.
            $endgroup$
            – Trevor Gunn
            Jan 13 at 5:29


















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you! Would graphing the functions and using the z axis as the complex plane reveal the trig function? am I only seeing the points are which cos goes through the RxR plane when I graph it as a real function?
            $endgroup$
            – Mario Drouga
            Jan 13 at 5:05






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Mario Possibly. Personally I find it easier to plot the real part and complex parts separately just in the xy-plane. For instance $(-1)^x = e^{x log(-1)} = e^{pi x i} = cos(pi x) + i sin(pi x)$. Converting $3^{frac{(-1)^x + 1}2}$ to a real and imaginary part will be a lot messier.
            $endgroup$
            – Trevor Gunn
            Jan 13 at 5:29
















          $begingroup$
          Thank you! Would graphing the functions and using the z axis as the complex plane reveal the trig function? am I only seeing the points are which cos goes through the RxR plane when I graph it as a real function?
          $endgroup$
          – Mario Drouga
          Jan 13 at 5:05




          $begingroup$
          Thank you! Would graphing the functions and using the z axis as the complex plane reveal the trig function? am I only seeing the points are which cos goes through the RxR plane when I graph it as a real function?
          $endgroup$
          – Mario Drouga
          Jan 13 at 5:05




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @Mario Possibly. Personally I find it easier to plot the real part and complex parts separately just in the xy-plane. For instance $(-1)^x = e^{x log(-1)} = e^{pi x i} = cos(pi x) + i sin(pi x)$. Converting $3^{frac{(-1)^x + 1}2}$ to a real and imaginary part will be a lot messier.
          $endgroup$
          – Trevor Gunn
          Jan 13 at 5:29




          $begingroup$
          @Mario Possibly. Personally I find it easier to plot the real part and complex parts separately just in the xy-plane. For instance $(-1)^x = e^{x log(-1)} = e^{pi x i} = cos(pi x) + i sin(pi x)$. Converting $3^{frac{(-1)^x + 1}2}$ to a real and imaginary part will be a lot messier.
          $endgroup$
          – Trevor Gunn
          Jan 13 at 5:29











          3












          $begingroup$

          This is of the same type of situation as saying that $2$ and $1 + 1$ are the same. They are different expressions for the same value.



          In your case, let $fleft(nright) = left(-1right)^n + 2$, for $n ge 0 text{ and } n in N$. For even values of $n$, the value is $1 + 2 = 3$ and for odd values of $n$, the value is $-1 + 3 = 1$.



          Similarly, let $hleft(nright) = 3^{frac{left(-1right)^n + 1}{2}}$. For $n$ being even here, the value of $left(-1right)^n = 1$, so the function becomes $3^{frac{left(1 + 1 right)}{2}} = 3^1 = 3$. With odd values of $n$, $left(-1right)^n = -1$, so the function becomes $3^{frac{left(-1 + 1right)}{2}} = 3^0 = 1$.



          As you can see, the $2$ functions always have the same value for all non-negative values of $n$. They are just different ways to express the set of results. However, I prefer $fleft(nright) = left(-1right)^n + 2$ as, to me at least, it's simpler to understand and use.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            You've proven that both functions are equal. Can you manipulate the form of function h(n) to get function f(n)?
            $endgroup$
            – Mario Drouga
            Jan 13 at 4:13










          • $begingroup$
            @MarioDrouga I'm not quite sure what you mean by "manipulate". How would you, for example, propose to "manipulate" $1 + 1$ to show it's the same as $2$?
            $endgroup$
            – John Omielan
            Jan 13 at 4:17












          • $begingroup$
            What if you haven't arrived to the solution of f(n)? Would you be able to simplify g(n) enough to get you to f(n)?
            $endgroup$
            – Mario Drouga
            Jan 13 at 4:19






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @MarioDrouga The most basic of "simplifications" are the numeric values themselves, just like $2$ is usually consider simpler than $1 + 1$. With the set of values you got, there are very many different ways to represent them, with you just using $2$. In general, don't worry about determining more than $1$ way to specify results, much less figuring out how to go directly from one to another. Instead, you would normally just try to find a relatively simple & straightforward way to represent your results & use this, with the understanding that it's not the one & only unique way to do it.
            $endgroup$
            – John Omielan
            Jan 13 at 4:22


















          3












          $begingroup$

          This is of the same type of situation as saying that $2$ and $1 + 1$ are the same. They are different expressions for the same value.



          In your case, let $fleft(nright) = left(-1right)^n + 2$, for $n ge 0 text{ and } n in N$. For even values of $n$, the value is $1 + 2 = 3$ and for odd values of $n$, the value is $-1 + 3 = 1$.



          Similarly, let $hleft(nright) = 3^{frac{left(-1right)^n + 1}{2}}$. For $n$ being even here, the value of $left(-1right)^n = 1$, so the function becomes $3^{frac{left(1 + 1 right)}{2}} = 3^1 = 3$. With odd values of $n$, $left(-1right)^n = -1$, so the function becomes $3^{frac{left(-1 + 1right)}{2}} = 3^0 = 1$.



          As you can see, the $2$ functions always have the same value for all non-negative values of $n$. They are just different ways to express the set of results. However, I prefer $fleft(nright) = left(-1right)^n + 2$ as, to me at least, it's simpler to understand and use.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            You've proven that both functions are equal. Can you manipulate the form of function h(n) to get function f(n)?
            $endgroup$
            – Mario Drouga
            Jan 13 at 4:13










          • $begingroup$
            @MarioDrouga I'm not quite sure what you mean by "manipulate". How would you, for example, propose to "manipulate" $1 + 1$ to show it's the same as $2$?
            $endgroup$
            – John Omielan
            Jan 13 at 4:17












          • $begingroup$
            What if you haven't arrived to the solution of f(n)? Would you be able to simplify g(n) enough to get you to f(n)?
            $endgroup$
            – Mario Drouga
            Jan 13 at 4:19






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @MarioDrouga The most basic of "simplifications" are the numeric values themselves, just like $2$ is usually consider simpler than $1 + 1$. With the set of values you got, there are very many different ways to represent them, with you just using $2$. In general, don't worry about determining more than $1$ way to specify results, much less figuring out how to go directly from one to another. Instead, you would normally just try to find a relatively simple & straightforward way to represent your results & use this, with the understanding that it's not the one & only unique way to do it.
            $endgroup$
            – John Omielan
            Jan 13 at 4:22
















          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          This is of the same type of situation as saying that $2$ and $1 + 1$ are the same. They are different expressions for the same value.



          In your case, let $fleft(nright) = left(-1right)^n + 2$, for $n ge 0 text{ and } n in N$. For even values of $n$, the value is $1 + 2 = 3$ and for odd values of $n$, the value is $-1 + 3 = 1$.



          Similarly, let $hleft(nright) = 3^{frac{left(-1right)^n + 1}{2}}$. For $n$ being even here, the value of $left(-1right)^n = 1$, so the function becomes $3^{frac{left(1 + 1 right)}{2}} = 3^1 = 3$. With odd values of $n$, $left(-1right)^n = -1$, so the function becomes $3^{frac{left(-1 + 1right)}{2}} = 3^0 = 1$.



          As you can see, the $2$ functions always have the same value for all non-negative values of $n$. They are just different ways to express the set of results. However, I prefer $fleft(nright) = left(-1right)^n + 2$ as, to me at least, it's simpler to understand and use.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          This is of the same type of situation as saying that $2$ and $1 + 1$ are the same. They are different expressions for the same value.



          In your case, let $fleft(nright) = left(-1right)^n + 2$, for $n ge 0 text{ and } n in N$. For even values of $n$, the value is $1 + 2 = 3$ and for odd values of $n$, the value is $-1 + 3 = 1$.



          Similarly, let $hleft(nright) = 3^{frac{left(-1right)^n + 1}{2}}$. For $n$ being even here, the value of $left(-1right)^n = 1$, so the function becomes $3^{frac{left(1 + 1 right)}{2}} = 3^1 = 3$. With odd values of $n$, $left(-1right)^n = -1$, so the function becomes $3^{frac{left(-1 + 1right)}{2}} = 3^0 = 1$.



          As you can see, the $2$ functions always have the same value for all non-negative values of $n$. They are just different ways to express the set of results. However, I prefer $fleft(nright) = left(-1right)^n + 2$ as, to me at least, it's simpler to understand and use.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 13 at 4:09









          John OmielanJohn Omielan

          1,776210




          1,776210












          • $begingroup$
            You've proven that both functions are equal. Can you manipulate the form of function h(n) to get function f(n)?
            $endgroup$
            – Mario Drouga
            Jan 13 at 4:13










          • $begingroup$
            @MarioDrouga I'm not quite sure what you mean by "manipulate". How would you, for example, propose to "manipulate" $1 + 1$ to show it's the same as $2$?
            $endgroup$
            – John Omielan
            Jan 13 at 4:17












          • $begingroup$
            What if you haven't arrived to the solution of f(n)? Would you be able to simplify g(n) enough to get you to f(n)?
            $endgroup$
            – Mario Drouga
            Jan 13 at 4:19






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @MarioDrouga The most basic of "simplifications" are the numeric values themselves, just like $2$ is usually consider simpler than $1 + 1$. With the set of values you got, there are very many different ways to represent them, with you just using $2$. In general, don't worry about determining more than $1$ way to specify results, much less figuring out how to go directly from one to another. Instead, you would normally just try to find a relatively simple & straightforward way to represent your results & use this, with the understanding that it's not the one & only unique way to do it.
            $endgroup$
            – John Omielan
            Jan 13 at 4:22




















          • $begingroup$
            You've proven that both functions are equal. Can you manipulate the form of function h(n) to get function f(n)?
            $endgroup$
            – Mario Drouga
            Jan 13 at 4:13










          • $begingroup$
            @MarioDrouga I'm not quite sure what you mean by "manipulate". How would you, for example, propose to "manipulate" $1 + 1$ to show it's the same as $2$?
            $endgroup$
            – John Omielan
            Jan 13 at 4:17












          • $begingroup$
            What if you haven't arrived to the solution of f(n)? Would you be able to simplify g(n) enough to get you to f(n)?
            $endgroup$
            – Mario Drouga
            Jan 13 at 4:19






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @MarioDrouga The most basic of "simplifications" are the numeric values themselves, just like $2$ is usually consider simpler than $1 + 1$. With the set of values you got, there are very many different ways to represent them, with you just using $2$. In general, don't worry about determining more than $1$ way to specify results, much less figuring out how to go directly from one to another. Instead, you would normally just try to find a relatively simple & straightforward way to represent your results & use this, with the understanding that it's not the one & only unique way to do it.
            $endgroup$
            – John Omielan
            Jan 13 at 4:22


















          $begingroup$
          You've proven that both functions are equal. Can you manipulate the form of function h(n) to get function f(n)?
          $endgroup$
          – Mario Drouga
          Jan 13 at 4:13




          $begingroup$
          You've proven that both functions are equal. Can you manipulate the form of function h(n) to get function f(n)?
          $endgroup$
          – Mario Drouga
          Jan 13 at 4:13












          $begingroup$
          @MarioDrouga I'm not quite sure what you mean by "manipulate". How would you, for example, propose to "manipulate" $1 + 1$ to show it's the same as $2$?
          $endgroup$
          – John Omielan
          Jan 13 at 4:17






          $begingroup$
          @MarioDrouga I'm not quite sure what you mean by "manipulate". How would you, for example, propose to "manipulate" $1 + 1$ to show it's the same as $2$?
          $endgroup$
          – John Omielan
          Jan 13 at 4:17














          $begingroup$
          What if you haven't arrived to the solution of f(n)? Would you be able to simplify g(n) enough to get you to f(n)?
          $endgroup$
          – Mario Drouga
          Jan 13 at 4:19




          $begingroup$
          What if you haven't arrived to the solution of f(n)? Would you be able to simplify g(n) enough to get you to f(n)?
          $endgroup$
          – Mario Drouga
          Jan 13 at 4:19




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @MarioDrouga The most basic of "simplifications" are the numeric values themselves, just like $2$ is usually consider simpler than $1 + 1$. With the set of values you got, there are very many different ways to represent them, with you just using $2$. In general, don't worry about determining more than $1$ way to specify results, much less figuring out how to go directly from one to another. Instead, you would normally just try to find a relatively simple & straightforward way to represent your results & use this, with the understanding that it's not the one & only unique way to do it.
          $endgroup$
          – John Omielan
          Jan 13 at 4:22






          $begingroup$
          @MarioDrouga The most basic of "simplifications" are the numeric values themselves, just like $2$ is usually consider simpler than $1 + 1$. With the set of values you got, there are very many different ways to represent them, with you just using $2$. In general, don't worry about determining more than $1$ way to specify results, much less figuring out how to go directly from one to another. Instead, you would normally just try to find a relatively simple & straightforward way to represent your results & use this, with the understanding that it's not the one & only unique way to do it.
          $endgroup$
          – John Omielan
          Jan 13 at 4:22




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071679%2fhow-do-you-simplify-3-frac-1n-12%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Mario Kart Wii

          What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

          Antonio Litta Visconti Arese