Strong induction. Fibonacci numbers












0












$begingroup$


Using Strong Induction, prove that the (n + 3)-rd Fibonacci number can be computed as 1 plus the sum of the first n + 1 Fibonacci numbers (remember n includes 0). so it has to be proven by Strong Induction with the Inductive Hypothesis applied twice . . . twice because of the nature of the two-term recurrence.



Here I'm confused. I know how to use simple induction.



But I have to use strong induction.



The inductive hypothesis will be like




For arbitrary k ∈ N, ∀j ∈ N, 1 ≤ j ≤ k, S(j)
and the inductive step should be like
(∀j ∈ N, 1 ≤ j ≤ k, S(j)) → S(k + 1) then???
Examples can be n =5, sum of first 5 fibonacci numbers are 7 + 1 = 8. There is a fibonacci number 8 which is (5+3).
(n+3)rd fibonacci number = F(n + 2)because n = F(n-1)











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The specific result you are referring to can be proven using regular induction. You could of course phrase it using strong induction, but you probably won't use anything more than $S(k)$ to prove $S(k+1)$. As for a hint, remember that $f_{n}+f_{n+1}=f_{n+2}$.
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Oct 30 '18 at 1:43










  • $begingroup$
    This tutorial explains how to typeset mathematics on this site.
    $endgroup$
    – N. F. Taussig
    Oct 30 '18 at 10:48
















0












$begingroup$


Using Strong Induction, prove that the (n + 3)-rd Fibonacci number can be computed as 1 plus the sum of the first n + 1 Fibonacci numbers (remember n includes 0). so it has to be proven by Strong Induction with the Inductive Hypothesis applied twice . . . twice because of the nature of the two-term recurrence.



Here I'm confused. I know how to use simple induction.



But I have to use strong induction.



The inductive hypothesis will be like




For arbitrary k ∈ N, ∀j ∈ N, 1 ≤ j ≤ k, S(j)
and the inductive step should be like
(∀j ∈ N, 1 ≤ j ≤ k, S(j)) → S(k + 1) then???
Examples can be n =5, sum of first 5 fibonacci numbers are 7 + 1 = 8. There is a fibonacci number 8 which is (5+3).
(n+3)rd fibonacci number = F(n + 2)because n = F(n-1)











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The specific result you are referring to can be proven using regular induction. You could of course phrase it using strong induction, but you probably won't use anything more than $S(k)$ to prove $S(k+1)$. As for a hint, remember that $f_{n}+f_{n+1}=f_{n+2}$.
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Oct 30 '18 at 1:43










  • $begingroup$
    This tutorial explains how to typeset mathematics on this site.
    $endgroup$
    – N. F. Taussig
    Oct 30 '18 at 10:48














0












0








0


1



$begingroup$


Using Strong Induction, prove that the (n + 3)-rd Fibonacci number can be computed as 1 plus the sum of the first n + 1 Fibonacci numbers (remember n includes 0). so it has to be proven by Strong Induction with the Inductive Hypothesis applied twice . . . twice because of the nature of the two-term recurrence.



Here I'm confused. I know how to use simple induction.



But I have to use strong induction.



The inductive hypothesis will be like




For arbitrary k ∈ N, ∀j ∈ N, 1 ≤ j ≤ k, S(j)
and the inductive step should be like
(∀j ∈ N, 1 ≤ j ≤ k, S(j)) → S(k + 1) then???
Examples can be n =5, sum of first 5 fibonacci numbers are 7 + 1 = 8. There is a fibonacci number 8 which is (5+3).
(n+3)rd fibonacci number = F(n + 2)because n = F(n-1)











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Using Strong Induction, prove that the (n + 3)-rd Fibonacci number can be computed as 1 plus the sum of the first n + 1 Fibonacci numbers (remember n includes 0). so it has to be proven by Strong Induction with the Inductive Hypothesis applied twice . . . twice because of the nature of the two-term recurrence.



Here I'm confused. I know how to use simple induction.



But I have to use strong induction.



The inductive hypothesis will be like




For arbitrary k ∈ N, ∀j ∈ N, 1 ≤ j ≤ k, S(j)
and the inductive step should be like
(∀j ∈ N, 1 ≤ j ≤ k, S(j)) → S(k + 1) then???
Examples can be n =5, sum of first 5 fibonacci numbers are 7 + 1 = 8. There is a fibonacci number 8 which is (5+3).
(n+3)rd fibonacci number = F(n + 2)because n = F(n-1)








discrete-mathematics induction fibonacci-numbers






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 17 at 23:09









Alexander Gruber

20k25102172




20k25102172










asked Oct 30 '18 at 1:33









dis mathdis math

13




13








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The specific result you are referring to can be proven using regular induction. You could of course phrase it using strong induction, but you probably won't use anything more than $S(k)$ to prove $S(k+1)$. As for a hint, remember that $f_{n}+f_{n+1}=f_{n+2}$.
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Oct 30 '18 at 1:43










  • $begingroup$
    This tutorial explains how to typeset mathematics on this site.
    $endgroup$
    – N. F. Taussig
    Oct 30 '18 at 10:48














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The specific result you are referring to can be proven using regular induction. You could of course phrase it using strong induction, but you probably won't use anything more than $S(k)$ to prove $S(k+1)$. As for a hint, remember that $f_{n}+f_{n+1}=f_{n+2}$.
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    Oct 30 '18 at 1:43










  • $begingroup$
    This tutorial explains how to typeset mathematics on this site.
    $endgroup$
    – N. F. Taussig
    Oct 30 '18 at 10:48








2




2




$begingroup$
The specific result you are referring to can be proven using regular induction. You could of course phrase it using strong induction, but you probably won't use anything more than $S(k)$ to prove $S(k+1)$. As for a hint, remember that $f_{n}+f_{n+1}=f_{n+2}$.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
Oct 30 '18 at 1:43




$begingroup$
The specific result you are referring to can be proven using regular induction. You could of course phrase it using strong induction, but you probably won't use anything more than $S(k)$ to prove $S(k+1)$. As for a hint, remember that $f_{n}+f_{n+1}=f_{n+2}$.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
Oct 30 '18 at 1:43












$begingroup$
This tutorial explains how to typeset mathematics on this site.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Oct 30 '18 at 10:48




$begingroup$
This tutorial explains how to typeset mathematics on this site.
$endgroup$
– N. F. Taussig
Oct 30 '18 at 10:48










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2976983%2fstrong-induction-fibonacci-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2976983%2fstrong-induction-fibonacci-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth