Optimizing a sum of functions












0












$begingroup$


I'm not an expert in optimization, but I am currently working on a problem where I need to maximize/minimize a function of the form,
begin{equation*}
g(alpha_0, alpha_1) = displaystyle sum_{i=1}^N c_i f(alpha_0 + alpha_1 d_i) \
a leq f(alpha_0 + alpha_1 d_i) leq b ~ forall , i = 1,2,...,N
end{equation*}

where $c,,din mathbb{R}^N$ and $a,,b in mathbb{R}$ are all fixed constants.



In this problem, I have some flexibility in the choice of $f(cdot)$. I know that this reduces to a linear optimization problem when $f(cdot)$ is linear, but I'm wondering if there are other classes of functions for which this is solvable? Or methods of function approximation that would allow me to get close to the optimum?



One function that is of particular interest to me is,
begin{equation*}
f(alpha_0 + alpha_1 d_i) = 1 + exp(alpha_0 + alpha_1 d_i)
end{equation*}

This is a convex function by itself, but $c_i f(alpha_0 + alpha_1 d_i)$ could be convex or concave depending on the sign of $c_i$, so my understanding is that this is not solvable.



Directing me to relevant literature/textbooks would be especially appreciated! Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I'm not an expert in optimization, but I am currently working on a problem where I need to maximize/minimize a function of the form,
    begin{equation*}
    g(alpha_0, alpha_1) = displaystyle sum_{i=1}^N c_i f(alpha_0 + alpha_1 d_i) \
    a leq f(alpha_0 + alpha_1 d_i) leq b ~ forall , i = 1,2,...,N
    end{equation*}

    where $c,,din mathbb{R}^N$ and $a,,b in mathbb{R}$ are all fixed constants.



    In this problem, I have some flexibility in the choice of $f(cdot)$. I know that this reduces to a linear optimization problem when $f(cdot)$ is linear, but I'm wondering if there are other classes of functions for which this is solvable? Or methods of function approximation that would allow me to get close to the optimum?



    One function that is of particular interest to me is,
    begin{equation*}
    f(alpha_0 + alpha_1 d_i) = 1 + exp(alpha_0 + alpha_1 d_i)
    end{equation*}

    This is a convex function by itself, but $c_i f(alpha_0 + alpha_1 d_i)$ could be convex or concave depending on the sign of $c_i$, so my understanding is that this is not solvable.



    Directing me to relevant literature/textbooks would be especially appreciated! Thank you.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I'm not an expert in optimization, but I am currently working on a problem where I need to maximize/minimize a function of the form,
      begin{equation*}
      g(alpha_0, alpha_1) = displaystyle sum_{i=1}^N c_i f(alpha_0 + alpha_1 d_i) \
      a leq f(alpha_0 + alpha_1 d_i) leq b ~ forall , i = 1,2,...,N
      end{equation*}

      where $c,,din mathbb{R}^N$ and $a,,b in mathbb{R}$ are all fixed constants.



      In this problem, I have some flexibility in the choice of $f(cdot)$. I know that this reduces to a linear optimization problem when $f(cdot)$ is linear, but I'm wondering if there are other classes of functions for which this is solvable? Or methods of function approximation that would allow me to get close to the optimum?



      One function that is of particular interest to me is,
      begin{equation*}
      f(alpha_0 + alpha_1 d_i) = 1 + exp(alpha_0 + alpha_1 d_i)
      end{equation*}

      This is a convex function by itself, but $c_i f(alpha_0 + alpha_1 d_i)$ could be convex or concave depending on the sign of $c_i$, so my understanding is that this is not solvable.



      Directing me to relevant literature/textbooks would be especially appreciated! Thank you.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I'm not an expert in optimization, but I am currently working on a problem where I need to maximize/minimize a function of the form,
      begin{equation*}
      g(alpha_0, alpha_1) = displaystyle sum_{i=1}^N c_i f(alpha_0 + alpha_1 d_i) \
      a leq f(alpha_0 + alpha_1 d_i) leq b ~ forall , i = 1,2,...,N
      end{equation*}

      where $c,,din mathbb{R}^N$ and $a,,b in mathbb{R}$ are all fixed constants.



      In this problem, I have some flexibility in the choice of $f(cdot)$. I know that this reduces to a linear optimization problem when $f(cdot)$ is linear, but I'm wondering if there are other classes of functions for which this is solvable? Or methods of function approximation that would allow me to get close to the optimum?



      One function that is of particular interest to me is,
      begin{equation*}
      f(alpha_0 + alpha_1 d_i) = 1 + exp(alpha_0 + alpha_1 d_i)
      end{equation*}

      This is a convex function by itself, but $c_i f(alpha_0 + alpha_1 d_i)$ could be convex or concave depending on the sign of $c_i$, so my understanding is that this is not solvable.



      Directing me to relevant literature/textbooks would be especially appreciated! Thank you.







      optimization nonlinear-optimization non-convex-optimization






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 21 at 23:44









      confusedstatisticianconfusedstatistician

      1




      1






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          First, the constraints are effectively linear as $f$ is monotonically increasing, you've just written them in a bad form.



          Since you only have two variables, and nice nonlinearties, even a global solver will solve this problem rather quickly if $N$ is modest. In the code below, I throw it to the simple spatial branch-and-bound global solver in YALMIP (disclaimer, developed by me), and it is solved in a couple of seconds for $N=50$



          N = 50;
          d = randn(N,1);
          c = randn(N,1);
          a = 2;
          b = 10;
          sdpvar alpha0 alpha1
          g = sum(c.*(1 + exp(alpha0 + alpha1*d)));
          Model = [log(a-1) <= alpha0 + alpha1*d <= log(b-1)];
          optimize(Model,g,sdpsettings('solver','bmibnb'))


          Also, for all the examples I tried, a local solver found the global solution too.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082572%2foptimizing-a-sum-of-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            First, the constraints are effectively linear as $f$ is monotonically increasing, you've just written them in a bad form.



            Since you only have two variables, and nice nonlinearties, even a global solver will solve this problem rather quickly if $N$ is modest. In the code below, I throw it to the simple spatial branch-and-bound global solver in YALMIP (disclaimer, developed by me), and it is solved in a couple of seconds for $N=50$



            N = 50;
            d = randn(N,1);
            c = randn(N,1);
            a = 2;
            b = 10;
            sdpvar alpha0 alpha1
            g = sum(c.*(1 + exp(alpha0 + alpha1*d)));
            Model = [log(a-1) <= alpha0 + alpha1*d <= log(b-1)];
            optimize(Model,g,sdpsettings('solver','bmibnb'))


            Also, for all the examples I tried, a local solver found the global solution too.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              First, the constraints are effectively linear as $f$ is monotonically increasing, you've just written them in a bad form.



              Since you only have two variables, and nice nonlinearties, even a global solver will solve this problem rather quickly if $N$ is modest. In the code below, I throw it to the simple spatial branch-and-bound global solver in YALMIP (disclaimer, developed by me), and it is solved in a couple of seconds for $N=50$



              N = 50;
              d = randn(N,1);
              c = randn(N,1);
              a = 2;
              b = 10;
              sdpvar alpha0 alpha1
              g = sum(c.*(1 + exp(alpha0 + alpha1*d)));
              Model = [log(a-1) <= alpha0 + alpha1*d <= log(b-1)];
              optimize(Model,g,sdpsettings('solver','bmibnb'))


              Also, for all the examples I tried, a local solver found the global solution too.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                First, the constraints are effectively linear as $f$ is monotonically increasing, you've just written them in a bad form.



                Since you only have two variables, and nice nonlinearties, even a global solver will solve this problem rather quickly if $N$ is modest. In the code below, I throw it to the simple spatial branch-and-bound global solver in YALMIP (disclaimer, developed by me), and it is solved in a couple of seconds for $N=50$



                N = 50;
                d = randn(N,1);
                c = randn(N,1);
                a = 2;
                b = 10;
                sdpvar alpha0 alpha1
                g = sum(c.*(1 + exp(alpha0 + alpha1*d)));
                Model = [log(a-1) <= alpha0 + alpha1*d <= log(b-1)];
                optimize(Model,g,sdpsettings('solver','bmibnb'))


                Also, for all the examples I tried, a local solver found the global solution too.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                First, the constraints are effectively linear as $f$ is monotonically increasing, you've just written them in a bad form.



                Since you only have two variables, and nice nonlinearties, even a global solver will solve this problem rather quickly if $N$ is modest. In the code below, I throw it to the simple spatial branch-and-bound global solver in YALMIP (disclaimer, developed by me), and it is solved in a couple of seconds for $N=50$



                N = 50;
                d = randn(N,1);
                c = randn(N,1);
                a = 2;
                b = 10;
                sdpvar alpha0 alpha1
                g = sum(c.*(1 + exp(alpha0 + alpha1*d)));
                Model = [log(a-1) <= alpha0 + alpha1*d <= log(b-1)];
                optimize(Model,g,sdpsettings('solver','bmibnb'))


                Also, for all the examples I tried, a local solver found the global solution too.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 23 at 18:31









                Johan LöfbergJohan Löfberg

                5,3001811




                5,3001811






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082572%2foptimizing-a-sum-of-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Mario Kart Wii

                    What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

                    Antonio Litta Visconti Arese