Converging Infinite Sum of Square Roots of Polynomials












0












$begingroup$


I was wondering if anyone knew a way to express a formula for the infinite sum of the following converging series when $d$ is between 0 and 1:



$$
sum_{n=2}^{infty}sqrt{d^{2n-1}(1-d^{n-1}-d^{n})}
$$



Thank you!






sequences-and-series convergence







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It doesn't converge.
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Jan 21 at 23:01










  • $begingroup$
    My bad I left out a term
    $endgroup$
    – Evan Dastin-van Rijn
    Jan 21 at 23:04










  • $begingroup$
    In the real domain, there is probably for $d$ an upper bound $<1$ above which the result would be a complex number.
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Jan 22 at 5:56
















0












$begingroup$


I was wondering if anyone knew a way to express a formula for the infinite sum of the following converging series when $d$ is between 0 and 1:



$$
sum_{n=2}^{infty}sqrt{d^{2n-1}(1-d^{n-1}-d^{n})}
$$



Thank you!






sequences-and-series convergence







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It doesn't converge.
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Jan 21 at 23:01










  • $begingroup$
    My bad I left out a term
    $endgroup$
    – Evan Dastin-van Rijn
    Jan 21 at 23:04










  • $begingroup$
    In the real domain, there is probably for $d$ an upper bound $<1$ above which the result would be a complex number.
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Jan 22 at 5:56














0












0








0


1



$begingroup$


I was wondering if anyone knew a way to express a formula for the infinite sum of the following converging series when $d$ is between 0 and 1:



$$
sum_{n=2}^{infty}sqrt{d^{2n-1}(1-d^{n-1}-d^{n})}
$$



Thank you!






sequences-and-series convergence







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I was wondering if anyone knew a way to express a formula for the infinite sum of the following converging series when $d$ is between 0 and 1:



$$
sum_{n=2}^{infty}sqrt{d^{2n-1}(1-d^{n-1}-d^{n})}
$$



Thank you!






sequences-and-series convergence




sequences-and-series convergence






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 21 at 23:04







Evan Dastin-van Rijn

















asked Jan 21 at 22:58









Evan Dastin-van RijnEvan Dastin-van Rijn

184




184












  • $begingroup$
    It doesn't converge.
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Jan 21 at 23:01










  • $begingroup$
    My bad I left out a term
    $endgroup$
    – Evan Dastin-van Rijn
    Jan 21 at 23:04










  • $begingroup$
    In the real domain, there is probably for $d$ an upper bound $<1$ above which the result would be a complex number.
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Jan 22 at 5:56


















  • $begingroup$
    It doesn't converge.
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Jan 21 at 23:01










  • $begingroup$
    My bad I left out a term
    $endgroup$
    – Evan Dastin-van Rijn
    Jan 21 at 23:04










  • $begingroup$
    In the real domain, there is probably for $d$ an upper bound $<1$ above which the result would be a complex number.
    $endgroup$
    – Claude Leibovici
    Jan 22 at 5:56
















$begingroup$
It doesn't converge.
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Jan 21 at 23:01




$begingroup$
It doesn't converge.
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Jan 21 at 23:01












$begingroup$
My bad I left out a term
$endgroup$
– Evan Dastin-van Rijn
Jan 21 at 23:04




$begingroup$
My bad I left out a term
$endgroup$
– Evan Dastin-van Rijn
Jan 21 at 23:04












$begingroup$
In the real domain, there is probably for $d$ an upper bound $<1$ above which the result would be a complex number.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 22 at 5:56




$begingroup$
In the real domain, there is probably for $d$ an upper bound $<1$ above which the result would be a complex number.
$endgroup$
– Claude Leibovici
Jan 22 at 5:56










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Not a real answer since based on numerical computations.



As I wrote in comments, considering
$$S(d)=sum_{n=2}^{infty}sqrt{d^{2n-1}(1-d^{n-1}-d^{n})}$$ the term $(1-d^{n-1}-d^{n})$ becomes negative for some value of $d$ or $n$ making the result to be a complex number. Numerically, $S(d)$ is real as long as $d leq 0.618033$. Moreover, to make life more difficult, $S(d)$ goes through a maximum value around $d=0.6071$.



I do not think that there is any hope for a closed form.



For the range $0 leq d leq 0.6$, a quick and dirty non linear regression of a power law model
$$S(x)=alpha, d^beta $$gives
$$begin{array}{clclclclc}
text{} & text{Estimate} & text{Standard Error} & text{Confidence Interval} \
alpha & 1.590951 & 0.007556 & {1.575821,1.606081} \
beta & 1.732464 & 0.006246 & {1.719956,1.744972} \
end{array}$$ $(R^2=0.99989)$ with a surprising $beta simeq sqrt 3$.



However, as shown below, the fit is not fantastic at all for small values of $d$
$$left(
begin{array}{ccc}
0.05 & 0.011471 & 0.008873 \
0.10 & 0.033329 & 0.029477 \
0.15 & 0.062983 & 0.059494 \
0.20 & 0.099883 & 0.097921 \
0.25 & 0.143984 & 0.144121 \
0.30 & 0.195496 & 0.197639 \
0.35 & 0.254772 & 0.258124 \
0.40 & 0.322209 & 0.325292 \
0.45 & 0.398040 & 0.398908 \
0.50 & 0.481771 & 0.478770 \
0.55 & 0.570129 & 0.564705 \
0.60 & 0.643821 & 0.656558
end{array}
right)$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082528%2fconverging-infinite-sum-of-square-roots-of-polynomials%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Not a real answer since based on numerical computations.



    As I wrote in comments, considering
    $$S(d)=sum_{n=2}^{infty}sqrt{d^{2n-1}(1-d^{n-1}-d^{n})}$$ the term $(1-d^{n-1}-d^{n})$ becomes negative for some value of $d$ or $n$ making the result to be a complex number. Numerically, $S(d)$ is real as long as $d leq 0.618033$. Moreover, to make life more difficult, $S(d)$ goes through a maximum value around $d=0.6071$.



    I do not think that there is any hope for a closed form.



    For the range $0 leq d leq 0.6$, a quick and dirty non linear regression of a power law model
    $$S(x)=alpha, d^beta $$gives
    $$begin{array}{clclclclc}
    text{} & text{Estimate} & text{Standard Error} & text{Confidence Interval} \
    alpha & 1.590951 & 0.007556 & {1.575821,1.606081} \
    beta & 1.732464 & 0.006246 & {1.719956,1.744972} \
    end{array}$$     $(R^2=0.99989)$ with a surprising $beta simeq sqrt 3$.



    However, as shown below, the fit is not fantastic at all for small values of $d$
    $$left(
    begin{array}{ccc}
    0.05 & 0.011471 & 0.008873 \
    0.10 & 0.033329 & 0.029477 \
    0.15 & 0.062983 & 0.059494 \
    0.20 & 0.099883 & 0.097921 \
    0.25 & 0.143984 & 0.144121 \
    0.30 & 0.195496 & 0.197639 \
    0.35 & 0.254772 & 0.258124 \
    0.40 & 0.322209 & 0.325292 \
    0.45 & 0.398040 & 0.398908 \
    0.50 & 0.481771 & 0.478770 \
    0.55 & 0.570129 & 0.564705 \
    0.60 & 0.643821 & 0.656558
    end{array}
    right)$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Not a real answer since based on numerical computations.



      As I wrote in comments, considering
      $$S(d)=sum_{n=2}^{infty}sqrt{d^{2n-1}(1-d^{n-1}-d^{n})}$$ the term $(1-d^{n-1}-d^{n})$ becomes negative for some value of $d$ or $n$ making the result to be a complex number. Numerically, $S(d)$ is real as long as $d leq 0.618033$. Moreover, to make life more difficult, $S(d)$ goes through a maximum value around $d=0.6071$.



      I do not think that there is any hope for a closed form.



      For the range $0 leq d leq 0.6$, a quick and dirty non linear regression of a power law model
      $$S(x)=alpha, d^beta $$gives
      $$begin{array}{clclclclc}
      text{} & text{Estimate} & text{Standard Error} & text{Confidence Interval} \
      alpha & 1.590951 & 0.007556 & {1.575821,1.606081} \
      beta & 1.732464 & 0.006246 & {1.719956,1.744972} \
      end{array}$$       $(R^2=0.99989)$ with a surprising $beta simeq sqrt 3$.



      However, as shown below, the fit is not fantastic at all for small values of $d$
      $$left(
      begin{array}{ccc}
      0.05 & 0.011471 & 0.008873 \
      0.10 & 0.033329 & 0.029477 \
      0.15 & 0.062983 & 0.059494 \
      0.20 & 0.099883 & 0.097921 \
      0.25 & 0.143984 & 0.144121 \
      0.30 & 0.195496 & 0.197639 \
      0.35 & 0.254772 & 0.258124 \
      0.40 & 0.322209 & 0.325292 \
      0.45 & 0.398040 & 0.398908 \
      0.50 & 0.481771 & 0.478770 \
      0.55 & 0.570129 & 0.564705 \
      0.60 & 0.643821 & 0.656558
      end{array}
      right)$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Not a real answer since based on numerical computations.



        As I wrote in comments, considering
        $$S(d)=sum_{n=2}^{infty}sqrt{d^{2n-1}(1-d^{n-1}-d^{n})}$$ the term $(1-d^{n-1}-d^{n})$ becomes negative for some value of $d$ or $n$ making the result to be a complex number. Numerically, $S(d)$ is real as long as $d leq 0.618033$. Moreover, to make life more difficult, $S(d)$ goes through a maximum value around $d=0.6071$.



        I do not think that there is any hope for a closed form.



        For the range $0 leq d leq 0.6$, a quick and dirty non linear regression of a power law model
        $$S(x)=alpha, d^beta $$gives
        $$begin{array}{clclclclc}
        text{} & text{Estimate} & text{Standard Error} & text{Confidence Interval} \
        alpha & 1.590951 & 0.007556 & {1.575821,1.606081} \
        beta & 1.732464 & 0.006246 & {1.719956,1.744972} \
        end{array}$$         $(R^2=0.99989)$ with a surprising $beta simeq sqrt 3$.



        However, as shown below, the fit is not fantastic at all for small values of $d$
        $$left(
        begin{array}{ccc}
        0.05 & 0.011471 & 0.008873 \
        0.10 & 0.033329 & 0.029477 \
        0.15 & 0.062983 & 0.059494 \
        0.20 & 0.099883 & 0.097921 \
        0.25 & 0.143984 & 0.144121 \
        0.30 & 0.195496 & 0.197639 \
        0.35 & 0.254772 & 0.258124 \
        0.40 & 0.322209 & 0.325292 \
        0.45 & 0.398040 & 0.398908 \
        0.50 & 0.481771 & 0.478770 \
        0.55 & 0.570129 & 0.564705 \
        0.60 & 0.643821 & 0.656558
        end{array}
        right)$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Not a real answer since based on numerical computations.



        As I wrote in comments, considering
        $$S(d)=sum_{n=2}^{infty}sqrt{d^{2n-1}(1-d^{n-1}-d^{n})}$$ the term $(1-d^{n-1}-d^{n})$ becomes negative for some value of $d$ or $n$ making the result to be a complex number. Numerically, $S(d)$ is real as long as $d leq 0.618033$. Moreover, to make life more difficult, $S(d)$ goes through a maximum value around $d=0.6071$.



        I do not think that there is any hope for a closed form.



        For the range $0 leq d leq 0.6$, a quick and dirty non linear regression of a power law model
        $$S(x)=alpha, d^beta $$gives
        $$begin{array}{clclclclc}
        text{} & text{Estimate} & text{Standard Error} & text{Confidence Interval} \
        alpha & 1.590951 & 0.007556 & {1.575821,1.606081} \
        beta & 1.732464 & 0.006246 & {1.719956,1.744972} \
        end{array}$$         $(R^2=0.99989)$ with a surprising $beta simeq sqrt 3$.



        However, as shown below, the fit is not fantastic at all for small values of $d$
        $$left(
        begin{array}{ccc}
        0.05 & 0.011471 & 0.008873 \
        0.10 & 0.033329 & 0.029477 \
        0.15 & 0.062983 & 0.059494 \
        0.20 & 0.099883 & 0.097921 \
        0.25 & 0.143984 & 0.144121 \
        0.30 & 0.195496 & 0.197639 \
        0.35 & 0.254772 & 0.258124 \
        0.40 & 0.322209 & 0.325292 \
        0.45 & 0.398040 & 0.398908 \
        0.50 & 0.481771 & 0.478770 \
        0.55 & 0.570129 & 0.564705 \
        0.60 & 0.643821 & 0.656558
        end{array}
        right)$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 22 at 7:20









        Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici

        122k1157134




        122k1157134






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082528%2fconverging-infinite-sum-of-square-roots-of-polynomials%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Mario Kart Wii

            Image
            Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! Mario Kart Wii From The Cutting Room Floor Jump to: navigation, search Mario Kart Wii Developer : Nintendo Publisher : Nintendo Platform : Wii Released in JP : April 10, 2008 Released in US : April 27, 2008 Released in EU : April 11, 2008 Released in AU : April 24, 2008 Released in KR : April 30, 2009 This game has unused animations. This game has unused areas. This game has unused code. This game has unused objects. This game has unused modes / minigames. This game has unused graphics. This game has unused models. This game has unused items. This game has unused music. This game has regional differences. This game has a notes page This game has a prerelease article Mario Kart Wii is the sixth game in the series (not counting Arcade editions), which intro
            Read more

            What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

            Image
            5 Does "Dominus providebit" mean "The Lord will provide" or "The Lord provides"? I once had a bit of an argument with a guy who studied Latin over that. It's an inscription that appears on the rim of some old Swiss coins that I have. meaning latin-to-english-translation grammar-identification share | improve this question edited Jan 18 at 15:27 V2Blast 105 4 asked Jan 17 at 22:49 Donald K. Donald K. 26 1
            Read more

            Antonio Litta Visconti Arese

            Image
            Antonio Litta Visconti Arese I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò In carica 1797 – 1820 Predecessore Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Successore Alfonso Litta Visconti Arese Trattamento Sua grazia Altri titoli Duca Litta Conte del Regno napoleonico d'Italia Patrizio milanese Don Nascita Milano, 2 maggio 1748 Morte Milano, 14 agosto 1820 Dinastia Litta Visconti Arese Padre Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Madre Maria Elisabetta Visconti Borromeo Consorte Barbara Barbiano di Belgioioso Religione cattolicesimo Antonio Litta Visconti Arese , I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò (Milano, 2 maggio 1748 – Milano, 14 agosto 1820), è stato un nobile e politico italiano. Composizione "Il pastore svizzero" di Pietro Morlacchi, con dedica Indice 1 Biografia 2 Onorificenze 3 Araldica 4 Albero genealogico 5 Note 6 Altri progetti Biografia | Antonio Litta Visco
            Read more