What is the minimum value of $|x| + |2x+1|+|3x+2|+cdots+|99x+98|$?
$begingroup$
What is the minimum value of the following?
$$A = |x| + |2x+1|+|3x+2|+cdots+|99x+98|$$
What I've tried so far:
- Since $|x| = |-x| $ it is clear that $|3x + 2|$ = $|-3x - 2|$, $|5x + 4| = |-5x-4|$ and so on.
- Therefore $A geq -x + 2x+1-3x-2+4x+3-5x-4+cdots-99x-98 = -50x - 49$ and I'm stuck here.
I'm quite sure it's not the right way to go, but that's what I've tried so far. Thanks in advance.
absolute-value maxima-minima
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What is the minimum value of the following?
$$A = |x| + |2x+1|+|3x+2|+cdots+|99x+98|$$
What I've tried so far:
- Since $|x| = |-x| $ it is clear that $|3x + 2|$ = $|-3x - 2|$, $|5x + 4| = |-5x-4|$ and so on.
- Therefore $A geq -x + 2x+1-3x-2+4x+3-5x-4+cdots-99x-98 = -50x - 49$ and I'm stuck here.
I'm quite sure it's not the right way to go, but that's what I've tried so far. Thanks in advance.
absolute-value maxima-minima
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@Yanko I'm not quite sure, might give it a try. Thanks for the suggestion
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 14:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What is the minimum value of the following?
$$A = |x| + |2x+1|+|3x+2|+cdots+|99x+98|$$
What I've tried so far:
- Since $|x| = |-x| $ it is clear that $|3x + 2|$ = $|-3x - 2|$, $|5x + 4| = |-5x-4|$ and so on.
- Therefore $A geq -x + 2x+1-3x-2+4x+3-5x-4+cdots-99x-98 = -50x - 49$ and I'm stuck here.
I'm quite sure it's not the right way to go, but that's what I've tried so far. Thanks in advance.
absolute-value maxima-minima
$endgroup$
What is the minimum value of the following?
$$A = |x| + |2x+1|+|3x+2|+cdots+|99x+98|$$
What I've tried so far:
- Since $|x| = |-x| $ it is clear that $|3x + 2|$ = $|-3x - 2|$, $|5x + 4| = |-5x-4|$ and so on.
- Therefore $A geq -x + 2x+1-3x-2+4x+3-5x-4+cdots-99x-98 = -50x - 49$ and I'm stuck here.
I'm quite sure it's not the right way to go, but that's what I've tried so far. Thanks in advance.
absolute-value maxima-minima
absolute-value maxima-minima
edited Jan 13 at 14:26
Blue
48k870153
48k870153
asked Jan 13 at 14:18
Brian LeBrian Le
1033
1033
$begingroup$
@Yanko I'm not quite sure, might give it a try. Thanks for the suggestion
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 14:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
@Yanko I'm not quite sure, might give it a try. Thanks for the suggestion
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 14:25
$begingroup$
@Yanko I'm not quite sure, might give it a try. Thanks for the suggestion
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 14:25
$begingroup$
@Yanko I'm not quite sure, might give it a try. Thanks for the suggestion
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 14:25
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The general term is of the form $f_n = |(n+1)x + n|$. For $x > -frac{n}{n+1} = c_n$ we have $f_n = (n+1)x + n$, for $x le -frac{n}{n+1}$ we have $f_n = -(n+1)x - n$. The terms $c_0 = 0 > c_n > c_{98} = -frac{98}{99}$.
So clearly $A$ will get large if $x>0$ or $x <-frac{98}{99}$.
So choose some $0 > x > -frac{98}{99}$. Then $c_{n-1} > x > c_n$ and
$$A = sum_{k=n}^{98} [(k+1)x + k] - sum_{k=0}^{n-1} [(k+1)x + k]\
= (98 - 2n)x + (frac12 98 cdot 99 - n (n+1))(x+1) \
= -(98 - 2n)frac{n}{n+1} + (49 cdot 99 - n (n+1))(-frac{n}{n+1} +1) \
=
frac{1}{n+1} left( -n (98 - 2n) + (49 cdot 99 - n (n+1))right) \
=
frac{n^2 - 99 n + 4851}{n+1}$$
and at $n =sqrt{4951} - 1 simeq 69.3$ this attains its local minimum $2 sqrt{4951} - 101 simeq 40 $.
So we should look at the neighbouring values to find the exact minimum of $A$ which will occur at some boundary.
For $n = 69$ and with the sum above we have that $A=frac{937}{23}simeq 40.739$.
For $n = 70$ we have that $A=frac{285}{7} simeq 40.714$ which is the lowest value, taken at $x = -frac{69}{70} simeq -0.9857$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's quite a lot of Maths. Do you think there's a simpler solution to this question?
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 15:00
$begingroup$
I don't know a simpler one.
$endgroup$
– Andreas
Jan 13 at 15:33
$begingroup$
Finally I got it. Thanks for the detailed answer :D
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 19:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: try to solve it for the first two terms. Then add the third term. You should see a pattern emerging.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hey, thanks for the answer! Was my initial method correct?
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 14:43
$begingroup$
You've only given a lower bound, and not an especially useful one: noting that $x > 0$ gives a stronger one.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Jan 13 at 14:45
$begingroup$
Indeed. Try to make cases for the first terms and see when they are positive or negative before applying the absolute values.
$endgroup$
– Ashik4ga
Jan 13 at 14:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since the function is piecewise linear, the minimum value, if it exists, must occur at one of the transition points (and it's straightforward to notice that for large values of $|x|$, the sum is large, so indeed the minimum value does occur).
Thus, the minimum value is achieved at $x = frac{1}{n} - 1$ for some $n in B = {1,ldots, 99}$.
Now, at some $x in (frac{1}{m+1} - 1,frac{1}{m} - 1)$ for some integer $m$ between $1$ and $98$ inclusive, the derivative of $A$ is given by
$$sumlimits_{i=m+1}^{99}i - sumlimits_{j=1}^{m}j = dfrac{(99-m)(100+m) - m(m+1)}{2} = 4950 - m - m^2,$$
which is $0$ when $m = frac{-1 pm sqrt{19801}}{2}$. One of the solutions is negative, the other is between 69 and 70. Thus, $A$ is decreasing on all of $(-infty, frac{1}{70}-1)$ and increasing on all of $(frac{1}{69}-1,infty)$, so our minimum is at either $x = frac{1}{69}-1$ or $x = frac{1}{70}-1$. Evaluating these two, we find that $$Aleft(frac{1}{69}-1right) = sumlimits_{i=70}^{99}left(frac{i}{69} -1right) + sumlimits_{j=1}^{69}left(1-frac{i}{69}right)=frac{937}{23}approx 40.739mbox{, and}$$
$$Aleft(frac{1}{70}-1right) = sumlimits_{i=71}^{99}left(frac{i}{70}-1right)+sumlimits_{j=1}^{70}left(1-frac{i}{70}right) = frac{285}{7} approx 40.714,$$
hence our minimum is at $x = frac{1}{70}-1$, with a value of $frac{285}{7}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If a sequence $a_1le a_2le cdotsle a_N$ is given, it is known (and we can also prove) that
$$
sum_{i=1}^N|x-a_i|
$$ is minimized at the median of the sequence $(a_i)_{i=1}^N$. (Put differently, the least mean absolute deviation estimator is given by the median.) The median is defined to be $a_{frac{N+1}{2}}$ if $N$ is odd and is equal to any value in $[a_{frac{N}{2}},a_{frac{N}{2}+1}]$ if $N$ is even.
In this case, by substituting $x=-z$, the objective function is
$$
sum_{i=1}^N|z-a_i|
$$ where ${a_i}={0,frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{3}{4},frac{3}{4},ldots,frac{98}{99}}$. Since $N=1+2+cdots +99 = 4950$, we should look for $2475$-th and $2476$-th term. Since there are $1+2+cdots +j=frac{j(j+1)}{2}$ terms in $${0,frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{3}{4},ldots,frac{j-1}{j},frac{j-1}{j}},$$ we know that there are $2485$ terms in
$$
{0,frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{3}{4},ldots,frac{69}{70},frac{69}{70}}.
$$ This shows that $2475$-th and $2476$-th terms are $frac{69}{70}$, and hence the minimum is attained by $x=-z=-frac{69}{70}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072042%2fwhat-is-the-minimum-value-of-x-2x13x2-cdots99x98%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The general term is of the form $f_n = |(n+1)x + n|$. For $x > -frac{n}{n+1} = c_n$ we have $f_n = (n+1)x + n$, for $x le -frac{n}{n+1}$ we have $f_n = -(n+1)x - n$. The terms $c_0 = 0 > c_n > c_{98} = -frac{98}{99}$.
So clearly $A$ will get large if $x>0$ or $x <-frac{98}{99}$.
So choose some $0 > x > -frac{98}{99}$. Then $c_{n-1} > x > c_n$ and
$$A = sum_{k=n}^{98} [(k+1)x + k] - sum_{k=0}^{n-1} [(k+1)x + k]\
= (98 - 2n)x + (frac12 98 cdot 99 - n (n+1))(x+1) \
= -(98 - 2n)frac{n}{n+1} + (49 cdot 99 - n (n+1))(-frac{n}{n+1} +1) \
=
frac{1}{n+1} left( -n (98 - 2n) + (49 cdot 99 - n (n+1))right) \
=
frac{n^2 - 99 n + 4851}{n+1}$$
and at $n =sqrt{4951} - 1 simeq 69.3$ this attains its local minimum $2 sqrt{4951} - 101 simeq 40 $.
So we should look at the neighbouring values to find the exact minimum of $A$ which will occur at some boundary.
For $n = 69$ and with the sum above we have that $A=frac{937}{23}simeq 40.739$.
For $n = 70$ we have that $A=frac{285}{7} simeq 40.714$ which is the lowest value, taken at $x = -frac{69}{70} simeq -0.9857$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's quite a lot of Maths. Do you think there's a simpler solution to this question?
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 15:00
$begingroup$
I don't know a simpler one.
$endgroup$
– Andreas
Jan 13 at 15:33
$begingroup$
Finally I got it. Thanks for the detailed answer :D
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 19:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The general term is of the form $f_n = |(n+1)x + n|$. For $x > -frac{n}{n+1} = c_n$ we have $f_n = (n+1)x + n$, for $x le -frac{n}{n+1}$ we have $f_n = -(n+1)x - n$. The terms $c_0 = 0 > c_n > c_{98} = -frac{98}{99}$.
So clearly $A$ will get large if $x>0$ or $x <-frac{98}{99}$.
So choose some $0 > x > -frac{98}{99}$. Then $c_{n-1} > x > c_n$ and
$$A = sum_{k=n}^{98} [(k+1)x + k] - sum_{k=0}^{n-1} [(k+1)x + k]\
= (98 - 2n)x + (frac12 98 cdot 99 - n (n+1))(x+1) \
= -(98 - 2n)frac{n}{n+1} + (49 cdot 99 - n (n+1))(-frac{n}{n+1} +1) \
=
frac{1}{n+1} left( -n (98 - 2n) + (49 cdot 99 - n (n+1))right) \
=
frac{n^2 - 99 n + 4851}{n+1}$$
and at $n =sqrt{4951} - 1 simeq 69.3$ this attains its local minimum $2 sqrt{4951} - 101 simeq 40 $.
So we should look at the neighbouring values to find the exact minimum of $A$ which will occur at some boundary.
For $n = 69$ and with the sum above we have that $A=frac{937}{23}simeq 40.739$.
For $n = 70$ we have that $A=frac{285}{7} simeq 40.714$ which is the lowest value, taken at $x = -frac{69}{70} simeq -0.9857$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's quite a lot of Maths. Do you think there's a simpler solution to this question?
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 15:00
$begingroup$
I don't know a simpler one.
$endgroup$
– Andreas
Jan 13 at 15:33
$begingroup$
Finally I got it. Thanks for the detailed answer :D
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 19:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The general term is of the form $f_n = |(n+1)x + n|$. For $x > -frac{n}{n+1} = c_n$ we have $f_n = (n+1)x + n$, for $x le -frac{n}{n+1}$ we have $f_n = -(n+1)x - n$. The terms $c_0 = 0 > c_n > c_{98} = -frac{98}{99}$.
So clearly $A$ will get large if $x>0$ or $x <-frac{98}{99}$.
So choose some $0 > x > -frac{98}{99}$. Then $c_{n-1} > x > c_n$ and
$$A = sum_{k=n}^{98} [(k+1)x + k] - sum_{k=0}^{n-1} [(k+1)x + k]\
= (98 - 2n)x + (frac12 98 cdot 99 - n (n+1))(x+1) \
= -(98 - 2n)frac{n}{n+1} + (49 cdot 99 - n (n+1))(-frac{n}{n+1} +1) \
=
frac{1}{n+1} left( -n (98 - 2n) + (49 cdot 99 - n (n+1))right) \
=
frac{n^2 - 99 n + 4851}{n+1}$$
and at $n =sqrt{4951} - 1 simeq 69.3$ this attains its local minimum $2 sqrt{4951} - 101 simeq 40 $.
So we should look at the neighbouring values to find the exact minimum of $A$ which will occur at some boundary.
For $n = 69$ and with the sum above we have that $A=frac{937}{23}simeq 40.739$.
For $n = 70$ we have that $A=frac{285}{7} simeq 40.714$ which is the lowest value, taken at $x = -frac{69}{70} simeq -0.9857$.
$endgroup$
The general term is of the form $f_n = |(n+1)x + n|$. For $x > -frac{n}{n+1} = c_n$ we have $f_n = (n+1)x + n$, for $x le -frac{n}{n+1}$ we have $f_n = -(n+1)x - n$. The terms $c_0 = 0 > c_n > c_{98} = -frac{98}{99}$.
So clearly $A$ will get large if $x>0$ or $x <-frac{98}{99}$.
So choose some $0 > x > -frac{98}{99}$. Then $c_{n-1} > x > c_n$ and
$$A = sum_{k=n}^{98} [(k+1)x + k] - sum_{k=0}^{n-1} [(k+1)x + k]\
= (98 - 2n)x + (frac12 98 cdot 99 - n (n+1))(x+1) \
= -(98 - 2n)frac{n}{n+1} + (49 cdot 99 - n (n+1))(-frac{n}{n+1} +1) \
=
frac{1}{n+1} left( -n (98 - 2n) + (49 cdot 99 - n (n+1))right) \
=
frac{n^2 - 99 n + 4851}{n+1}$$
and at $n =sqrt{4951} - 1 simeq 69.3$ this attains its local minimum $2 sqrt{4951} - 101 simeq 40 $.
So we should look at the neighbouring values to find the exact minimum of $A$ which will occur at some boundary.
For $n = 69$ and with the sum above we have that $A=frac{937}{23}simeq 40.739$.
For $n = 70$ we have that $A=frac{285}{7} simeq 40.714$ which is the lowest value, taken at $x = -frac{69}{70} simeq -0.9857$.
edited Jan 13 at 15:33
answered Jan 13 at 14:54
AndreasAndreas
7,9801037
7,9801037
$begingroup$
That's quite a lot of Maths. Do you think there's a simpler solution to this question?
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 15:00
$begingroup$
I don't know a simpler one.
$endgroup$
– Andreas
Jan 13 at 15:33
$begingroup$
Finally I got it. Thanks for the detailed answer :D
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 19:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That's quite a lot of Maths. Do you think there's a simpler solution to this question?
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 15:00
$begingroup$
I don't know a simpler one.
$endgroup$
– Andreas
Jan 13 at 15:33
$begingroup$
Finally I got it. Thanks for the detailed answer :D
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 19:37
$begingroup$
That's quite a lot of Maths. Do you think there's a simpler solution to this question?
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 15:00
$begingroup$
That's quite a lot of Maths. Do you think there's a simpler solution to this question?
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 15:00
$begingroup$
I don't know a simpler one.
$endgroup$
– Andreas
Jan 13 at 15:33
$begingroup$
I don't know a simpler one.
$endgroup$
– Andreas
Jan 13 at 15:33
$begingroup$
Finally I got it. Thanks for the detailed answer :D
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 19:37
$begingroup$
Finally I got it. Thanks for the detailed answer :D
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 19:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: try to solve it for the first two terms. Then add the third term. You should see a pattern emerging.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hey, thanks for the answer! Was my initial method correct?
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 14:43
$begingroup$
You've only given a lower bound, and not an especially useful one: noting that $x > 0$ gives a stronger one.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Jan 13 at 14:45
$begingroup$
Indeed. Try to make cases for the first terms and see when they are positive or negative before applying the absolute values.
$endgroup$
– Ashik4ga
Jan 13 at 14:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: try to solve it for the first two terms. Then add the third term. You should see a pattern emerging.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hey, thanks for the answer! Was my initial method correct?
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 14:43
$begingroup$
You've only given a lower bound, and not an especially useful one: noting that $x > 0$ gives a stronger one.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Jan 13 at 14:45
$begingroup$
Indeed. Try to make cases for the first terms and see when they are positive or negative before applying the absolute values.
$endgroup$
– Ashik4ga
Jan 13 at 14:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: try to solve it for the first two terms. Then add the third term. You should see a pattern emerging.
$endgroup$
Hint: try to solve it for the first two terms. Then add the third term. You should see a pattern emerging.
answered Jan 13 at 14:42
Ashik4gaAshik4ga
363
363
$begingroup$
Hey, thanks for the answer! Was my initial method correct?
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 14:43
$begingroup$
You've only given a lower bound, and not an especially useful one: noting that $x > 0$ gives a stronger one.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Jan 13 at 14:45
$begingroup$
Indeed. Try to make cases for the first terms and see when they are positive or negative before applying the absolute values.
$endgroup$
– Ashik4ga
Jan 13 at 14:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hey, thanks for the answer! Was my initial method correct?
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 14:43
$begingroup$
You've only given a lower bound, and not an especially useful one: noting that $x > 0$ gives a stronger one.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Jan 13 at 14:45
$begingroup$
Indeed. Try to make cases for the first terms and see when they are positive or negative before applying the absolute values.
$endgroup$
– Ashik4ga
Jan 13 at 14:46
$begingroup$
Hey, thanks for the answer! Was my initial method correct?
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 14:43
$begingroup$
Hey, thanks for the answer! Was my initial method correct?
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 14:43
$begingroup$
You've only given a lower bound, and not an especially useful one: noting that $x > 0$ gives a stronger one.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Jan 13 at 14:45
$begingroup$
You've only given a lower bound, and not an especially useful one: noting that $x > 0$ gives a stronger one.
$endgroup$
– user3482749
Jan 13 at 14:45
$begingroup$
Indeed. Try to make cases for the first terms and see when they are positive or negative before applying the absolute values.
$endgroup$
– Ashik4ga
Jan 13 at 14:46
$begingroup$
Indeed. Try to make cases for the first terms and see when they are positive or negative before applying the absolute values.
$endgroup$
– Ashik4ga
Jan 13 at 14:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since the function is piecewise linear, the minimum value, if it exists, must occur at one of the transition points (and it's straightforward to notice that for large values of $|x|$, the sum is large, so indeed the minimum value does occur).
Thus, the minimum value is achieved at $x = frac{1}{n} - 1$ for some $n in B = {1,ldots, 99}$.
Now, at some $x in (frac{1}{m+1} - 1,frac{1}{m} - 1)$ for some integer $m$ between $1$ and $98$ inclusive, the derivative of $A$ is given by
$$sumlimits_{i=m+1}^{99}i - sumlimits_{j=1}^{m}j = dfrac{(99-m)(100+m) - m(m+1)}{2} = 4950 - m - m^2,$$
which is $0$ when $m = frac{-1 pm sqrt{19801}}{2}$. One of the solutions is negative, the other is between 69 and 70. Thus, $A$ is decreasing on all of $(-infty, frac{1}{70}-1)$ and increasing on all of $(frac{1}{69}-1,infty)$, so our minimum is at either $x = frac{1}{69}-1$ or $x = frac{1}{70}-1$. Evaluating these two, we find that $$Aleft(frac{1}{69}-1right) = sumlimits_{i=70}^{99}left(frac{i}{69} -1right) + sumlimits_{j=1}^{69}left(1-frac{i}{69}right)=frac{937}{23}approx 40.739mbox{, and}$$
$$Aleft(frac{1}{70}-1right) = sumlimits_{i=71}^{99}left(frac{i}{70}-1right)+sumlimits_{j=1}^{70}left(1-frac{i}{70}right) = frac{285}{7} approx 40.714,$$
hence our minimum is at $x = frac{1}{70}-1$, with a value of $frac{285}{7}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since the function is piecewise linear, the minimum value, if it exists, must occur at one of the transition points (and it's straightforward to notice that for large values of $|x|$, the sum is large, so indeed the minimum value does occur).
Thus, the minimum value is achieved at $x = frac{1}{n} - 1$ for some $n in B = {1,ldots, 99}$.
Now, at some $x in (frac{1}{m+1} - 1,frac{1}{m} - 1)$ for some integer $m$ between $1$ and $98$ inclusive, the derivative of $A$ is given by
$$sumlimits_{i=m+1}^{99}i - sumlimits_{j=1}^{m}j = dfrac{(99-m)(100+m) - m(m+1)}{2} = 4950 - m - m^2,$$
which is $0$ when $m = frac{-1 pm sqrt{19801}}{2}$. One of the solutions is negative, the other is between 69 and 70. Thus, $A$ is decreasing on all of $(-infty, frac{1}{70}-1)$ and increasing on all of $(frac{1}{69}-1,infty)$, so our minimum is at either $x = frac{1}{69}-1$ or $x = frac{1}{70}-1$. Evaluating these two, we find that $$Aleft(frac{1}{69}-1right) = sumlimits_{i=70}^{99}left(frac{i}{69} -1right) + sumlimits_{j=1}^{69}left(1-frac{i}{69}right)=frac{937}{23}approx 40.739mbox{, and}$$
$$Aleft(frac{1}{70}-1right) = sumlimits_{i=71}^{99}left(frac{i}{70}-1right)+sumlimits_{j=1}^{70}left(1-frac{i}{70}right) = frac{285}{7} approx 40.714,$$
hence our minimum is at $x = frac{1}{70}-1$, with a value of $frac{285}{7}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since the function is piecewise linear, the minimum value, if it exists, must occur at one of the transition points (and it's straightforward to notice that for large values of $|x|$, the sum is large, so indeed the minimum value does occur).
Thus, the minimum value is achieved at $x = frac{1}{n} - 1$ for some $n in B = {1,ldots, 99}$.
Now, at some $x in (frac{1}{m+1} - 1,frac{1}{m} - 1)$ for some integer $m$ between $1$ and $98$ inclusive, the derivative of $A$ is given by
$$sumlimits_{i=m+1}^{99}i - sumlimits_{j=1}^{m}j = dfrac{(99-m)(100+m) - m(m+1)}{2} = 4950 - m - m^2,$$
which is $0$ when $m = frac{-1 pm sqrt{19801}}{2}$. One of the solutions is negative, the other is between 69 and 70. Thus, $A$ is decreasing on all of $(-infty, frac{1}{70}-1)$ and increasing on all of $(frac{1}{69}-1,infty)$, so our minimum is at either $x = frac{1}{69}-1$ or $x = frac{1}{70}-1$. Evaluating these two, we find that $$Aleft(frac{1}{69}-1right) = sumlimits_{i=70}^{99}left(frac{i}{69} -1right) + sumlimits_{j=1}^{69}left(1-frac{i}{69}right)=frac{937}{23}approx 40.739mbox{, and}$$
$$Aleft(frac{1}{70}-1right) = sumlimits_{i=71}^{99}left(frac{i}{70}-1right)+sumlimits_{j=1}^{70}left(1-frac{i}{70}right) = frac{285}{7} approx 40.714,$$
hence our minimum is at $x = frac{1}{70}-1$, with a value of $frac{285}{7}$.
$endgroup$
Since the function is piecewise linear, the minimum value, if it exists, must occur at one of the transition points (and it's straightforward to notice that for large values of $|x|$, the sum is large, so indeed the minimum value does occur).
Thus, the minimum value is achieved at $x = frac{1}{n} - 1$ for some $n in B = {1,ldots, 99}$.
Now, at some $x in (frac{1}{m+1} - 1,frac{1}{m} - 1)$ for some integer $m$ between $1$ and $98$ inclusive, the derivative of $A$ is given by
$$sumlimits_{i=m+1}^{99}i - sumlimits_{j=1}^{m}j = dfrac{(99-m)(100+m) - m(m+1)}{2} = 4950 - m - m^2,$$
which is $0$ when $m = frac{-1 pm sqrt{19801}}{2}$. One of the solutions is negative, the other is between 69 and 70. Thus, $A$ is decreasing on all of $(-infty, frac{1}{70}-1)$ and increasing on all of $(frac{1}{69}-1,infty)$, so our minimum is at either $x = frac{1}{69}-1$ or $x = frac{1}{70}-1$. Evaluating these two, we find that $$Aleft(frac{1}{69}-1right) = sumlimits_{i=70}^{99}left(frac{i}{69} -1right) + sumlimits_{j=1}^{69}left(1-frac{i}{69}right)=frac{937}{23}approx 40.739mbox{, and}$$
$$Aleft(frac{1}{70}-1right) = sumlimits_{i=71}^{99}left(frac{i}{70}-1right)+sumlimits_{j=1}^{70}left(1-frac{i}{70}right) = frac{285}{7} approx 40.714,$$
hence our minimum is at $x = frac{1}{70}-1$, with a value of $frac{285}{7}$.
answered Jan 13 at 15:24
user3482749user3482749
4,206919
4,206919
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If a sequence $a_1le a_2le cdotsle a_N$ is given, it is known (and we can also prove) that
$$
sum_{i=1}^N|x-a_i|
$$ is minimized at the median of the sequence $(a_i)_{i=1}^N$. (Put differently, the least mean absolute deviation estimator is given by the median.) The median is defined to be $a_{frac{N+1}{2}}$ if $N$ is odd and is equal to any value in $[a_{frac{N}{2}},a_{frac{N}{2}+1}]$ if $N$ is even.
In this case, by substituting $x=-z$, the objective function is
$$
sum_{i=1}^N|z-a_i|
$$ where ${a_i}={0,frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{3}{4},frac{3}{4},ldots,frac{98}{99}}$. Since $N=1+2+cdots +99 = 4950$, we should look for $2475$-th and $2476$-th term. Since there are $1+2+cdots +j=frac{j(j+1)}{2}$ terms in $${0,frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{3}{4},ldots,frac{j-1}{j},frac{j-1}{j}},$$ we know that there are $2485$ terms in
$$
{0,frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{3}{4},ldots,frac{69}{70},frac{69}{70}}.
$$ This shows that $2475$-th and $2476$-th terms are $frac{69}{70}$, and hence the minimum is attained by $x=-z=-frac{69}{70}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If a sequence $a_1le a_2le cdotsle a_N$ is given, it is known (and we can also prove) that
$$
sum_{i=1}^N|x-a_i|
$$ is minimized at the median of the sequence $(a_i)_{i=1}^N$. (Put differently, the least mean absolute deviation estimator is given by the median.) The median is defined to be $a_{frac{N+1}{2}}$ if $N$ is odd and is equal to any value in $[a_{frac{N}{2}},a_{frac{N}{2}+1}]$ if $N$ is even.
In this case, by substituting $x=-z$, the objective function is
$$
sum_{i=1}^N|z-a_i|
$$ where ${a_i}={0,frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{3}{4},frac{3}{4},ldots,frac{98}{99}}$. Since $N=1+2+cdots +99 = 4950$, we should look for $2475$-th and $2476$-th term. Since there are $1+2+cdots +j=frac{j(j+1)}{2}$ terms in $${0,frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{3}{4},ldots,frac{j-1}{j},frac{j-1}{j}},$$ we know that there are $2485$ terms in
$$
{0,frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{3}{4},ldots,frac{69}{70},frac{69}{70}}.
$$ This shows that $2475$-th and $2476$-th terms are $frac{69}{70}$, and hence the minimum is attained by $x=-z=-frac{69}{70}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If a sequence $a_1le a_2le cdotsle a_N$ is given, it is known (and we can also prove) that
$$
sum_{i=1}^N|x-a_i|
$$ is minimized at the median of the sequence $(a_i)_{i=1}^N$. (Put differently, the least mean absolute deviation estimator is given by the median.) The median is defined to be $a_{frac{N+1}{2}}$ if $N$ is odd and is equal to any value in $[a_{frac{N}{2}},a_{frac{N}{2}+1}]$ if $N$ is even.
In this case, by substituting $x=-z$, the objective function is
$$
sum_{i=1}^N|z-a_i|
$$ where ${a_i}={0,frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{3}{4},frac{3}{4},ldots,frac{98}{99}}$. Since $N=1+2+cdots +99 = 4950$, we should look for $2475$-th and $2476$-th term. Since there are $1+2+cdots +j=frac{j(j+1)}{2}$ terms in $${0,frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{3}{4},ldots,frac{j-1}{j},frac{j-1}{j}},$$ we know that there are $2485$ terms in
$$
{0,frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{3}{4},ldots,frac{69}{70},frac{69}{70}}.
$$ This shows that $2475$-th and $2476$-th terms are $frac{69}{70}$, and hence the minimum is attained by $x=-z=-frac{69}{70}$.
$endgroup$
If a sequence $a_1le a_2le cdotsle a_N$ is given, it is known (and we can also prove) that
$$
sum_{i=1}^N|x-a_i|
$$ is minimized at the median of the sequence $(a_i)_{i=1}^N$. (Put differently, the least mean absolute deviation estimator is given by the median.) The median is defined to be $a_{frac{N+1}{2}}$ if $N$ is odd and is equal to any value in $[a_{frac{N}{2}},a_{frac{N}{2}+1}]$ if $N$ is even.
In this case, by substituting $x=-z$, the objective function is
$$
sum_{i=1}^N|z-a_i|
$$ where ${a_i}={0,frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{3}{4},frac{3}{4},ldots,frac{98}{99}}$. Since $N=1+2+cdots +99 = 4950$, we should look for $2475$-th and $2476$-th term. Since there are $1+2+cdots +j=frac{j(j+1)}{2}$ terms in $${0,frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{3}{4},ldots,frac{j-1}{j},frac{j-1}{j}},$$ we know that there are $2485$ terms in
$$
{0,frac{1}{2},frac{1}{2},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{2}{3},frac{3}{4},ldots,frac{69}{70},frac{69}{70}}.
$$ This shows that $2475$-th and $2476$-th terms are $frac{69}{70}$, and hence the minimum is attained by $x=-z=-frac{69}{70}$.
edited Jan 13 at 15:30
answered Jan 13 at 15:11
SongSong
11.1k628
11.1k628
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072042%2fwhat-is-the-minimum-value-of-x-2x13x2-cdots99x98%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
@Yanko I'm not quite sure, might give it a try. Thanks for the suggestion
$endgroup$
– Brian Le
Jan 13 at 14:25