Chktex complains about “no italic correction found”, how to fix this?
I use the following code for custom theorems, as I like slanted text in thereoms better than italicized, using amsthm
.
newtheoremstyle{thm-sl}
{}{}
{slshape} % slanted text instead of italicized
{}
{bfseries}
{.}
{.5em}
{}
I get a warning from chktex
:
Warning 6 in doc.tex line 21: No italic correction (`/') found.
{slshape} % slanted text instead of italicized
^
I understand, that italic correction (/
) should be used, to insert some space between italicized/slanted characters and upright characters, appearing directly after another. Though in my case, there should be no characters after the slanted text.
So is this just an overreaction of chktex
or is there a more "correct" to use newtheoremstyle
?
Funnily, using {slshape/}
mutes chktex
, but will not compile, due to the error
! You can't use `/' in vertical mode.
amsthm italic slanted italic-correction chktex
add a comment |
I use the following code for custom theorems, as I like slanted text in thereoms better than italicized, using amsthm
.
newtheoremstyle{thm-sl}
{}{}
{slshape} % slanted text instead of italicized
{}
{bfseries}
{.}
{.5em}
{}
I get a warning from chktex
:
Warning 6 in doc.tex line 21: No italic correction (`/') found.
{slshape} % slanted text instead of italicized
^
I understand, that italic correction (/
) should be used, to insert some space between italicized/slanted characters and upright characters, appearing directly after another. Though in my case, there should be no characters after the slanted text.
So is this just an overreaction of chktex
or is there a more "correct" to use newtheoremstyle
?
Funnily, using {slshape/}
mutes chktex
, but will not compile, due to the error
! You can't use `/' in vertical mode.
amsthm italic slanted italic-correction chktex
1
I guess in that case you just don't want to keepchktex
happy. These automatic tools can't always get everything right.
– moewe
Jan 13 at 12:14
1
Apparently you should be able to silence the warning by adding% chktex 6
after the{slshape}
(haven't tested that).
– moewe
Jan 13 at 12:40
Yep that works, thanks!
– red_trumpet
Jan 13 at 12:48
I'm not even sure whychktex
examines things in the preamble.
– egreg
Jan 13 at 14:23
add a comment |
I use the following code for custom theorems, as I like slanted text in thereoms better than italicized, using amsthm
.
newtheoremstyle{thm-sl}
{}{}
{slshape} % slanted text instead of italicized
{}
{bfseries}
{.}
{.5em}
{}
I get a warning from chktex
:
Warning 6 in doc.tex line 21: No italic correction (`/') found.
{slshape} % slanted text instead of italicized
^
I understand, that italic correction (/
) should be used, to insert some space between italicized/slanted characters and upright characters, appearing directly after another. Though in my case, there should be no characters after the slanted text.
So is this just an overreaction of chktex
or is there a more "correct" to use newtheoremstyle
?
Funnily, using {slshape/}
mutes chktex
, but will not compile, due to the error
! You can't use `/' in vertical mode.
amsthm italic slanted italic-correction chktex
I use the following code for custom theorems, as I like slanted text in thereoms better than italicized, using amsthm
.
newtheoremstyle{thm-sl}
{}{}
{slshape} % slanted text instead of italicized
{}
{bfseries}
{.}
{.5em}
{}
I get a warning from chktex
:
Warning 6 in doc.tex line 21: No italic correction (`/') found.
{slshape} % slanted text instead of italicized
^
I understand, that italic correction (/
) should be used, to insert some space between italicized/slanted characters and upright characters, appearing directly after another. Though in my case, there should be no characters after the slanted text.
So is this just an overreaction of chktex
or is there a more "correct" to use newtheoremstyle
?
Funnily, using {slshape/}
mutes chktex
, but will not compile, due to the error
! You can't use `/' in vertical mode.
amsthm italic slanted italic-correction chktex
amsthm italic slanted italic-correction chktex
asked Jan 13 at 12:12
red_trumpetred_trumpet
1749
1749
1
I guess in that case you just don't want to keepchktex
happy. These automatic tools can't always get everything right.
– moewe
Jan 13 at 12:14
1
Apparently you should be able to silence the warning by adding% chktex 6
after the{slshape}
(haven't tested that).
– moewe
Jan 13 at 12:40
Yep that works, thanks!
– red_trumpet
Jan 13 at 12:48
I'm not even sure whychktex
examines things in the preamble.
– egreg
Jan 13 at 14:23
add a comment |
1
I guess in that case you just don't want to keepchktex
happy. These automatic tools can't always get everything right.
– moewe
Jan 13 at 12:14
1
Apparently you should be able to silence the warning by adding% chktex 6
after the{slshape}
(haven't tested that).
– moewe
Jan 13 at 12:40
Yep that works, thanks!
– red_trumpet
Jan 13 at 12:48
I'm not even sure whychktex
examines things in the preamble.
– egreg
Jan 13 at 14:23
1
1
I guess in that case you just don't want to keep
chktex
happy. These automatic tools can't always get everything right.– moewe
Jan 13 at 12:14
I guess in that case you just don't want to keep
chktex
happy. These automatic tools can't always get everything right.– moewe
Jan 13 at 12:14
1
1
Apparently you should be able to silence the warning by adding
% chktex 6
after the {slshape}
(haven't tested that).– moewe
Jan 13 at 12:40
Apparently you should be able to silence the warning by adding
% chktex 6
after the {slshape}
(haven't tested that).– moewe
Jan 13 at 12:40
Yep that works, thanks!
– red_trumpet
Jan 13 at 12:48
Yep that works, thanks!
– red_trumpet
Jan 13 at 12:48
I'm not even sure why
chktex
examines things in the preamble.– egreg
Jan 13 at 14:23
I'm not even sure why
chktex
examines things in the preamble.– egreg
Jan 13 at 14:23
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Automatic syntax checkers or linters don't (and maybe can't) always get everything right.
In this case there is no need for italic correction with slshape
since the following text will start in a new line and not directly after the slanted text in the same line. Anyway, it would certainly be inappropriate to add /
directly after slshape
here since the correction needs to be added at the end of the slanted/italic text ({slhape lorem ipsumf/} dolor
not {slshape/ lorem ipsumf} dolor
). Here the {slshape}
is not a group that prints anything, it is the argument of a command that determines the formatting of the theorem later.
You can disable the warning by adding a comment with checktex 6
in the offending line
newtheoremstyle{thm-sl}
{}{}
{slshape}% chktex 6
{}
{bfseries}
{.}
{.5em}
{}
See §6.1.4 of the ChkTeX documentation.
Since you are probably going to use only the text...{...}
macros instead of their switches (textit
–itshape
etc.) in the document you could probably disable the entire warning 6 altogether. The documentation has more hints on that (-n6
command line option or chktexrc
config file).
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469942%2fchktex-complains-about-no-italic-correction-found-how-to-fix-this%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Automatic syntax checkers or linters don't (and maybe can't) always get everything right.
In this case there is no need for italic correction with slshape
since the following text will start in a new line and not directly after the slanted text in the same line. Anyway, it would certainly be inappropriate to add /
directly after slshape
here since the correction needs to be added at the end of the slanted/italic text ({slhape lorem ipsumf/} dolor
not {slshape/ lorem ipsumf} dolor
). Here the {slshape}
is not a group that prints anything, it is the argument of a command that determines the formatting of the theorem later.
You can disable the warning by adding a comment with checktex 6
in the offending line
newtheoremstyle{thm-sl}
{}{}
{slshape}% chktex 6
{}
{bfseries}
{.}
{.5em}
{}
See §6.1.4 of the ChkTeX documentation.
Since you are probably going to use only the text...{...}
macros instead of their switches (textit
–itshape
etc.) in the document you could probably disable the entire warning 6 altogether. The documentation has more hints on that (-n6
command line option or chktexrc
config file).
add a comment |
Automatic syntax checkers or linters don't (and maybe can't) always get everything right.
In this case there is no need for italic correction with slshape
since the following text will start in a new line and not directly after the slanted text in the same line. Anyway, it would certainly be inappropriate to add /
directly after slshape
here since the correction needs to be added at the end of the slanted/italic text ({slhape lorem ipsumf/} dolor
not {slshape/ lorem ipsumf} dolor
). Here the {slshape}
is not a group that prints anything, it is the argument of a command that determines the formatting of the theorem later.
You can disable the warning by adding a comment with checktex 6
in the offending line
newtheoremstyle{thm-sl}
{}{}
{slshape}% chktex 6
{}
{bfseries}
{.}
{.5em}
{}
See §6.1.4 of the ChkTeX documentation.
Since you are probably going to use only the text...{...}
macros instead of their switches (textit
–itshape
etc.) in the document you could probably disable the entire warning 6 altogether. The documentation has more hints on that (-n6
command line option or chktexrc
config file).
add a comment |
Automatic syntax checkers or linters don't (and maybe can't) always get everything right.
In this case there is no need for italic correction with slshape
since the following text will start in a new line and not directly after the slanted text in the same line. Anyway, it would certainly be inappropriate to add /
directly after slshape
here since the correction needs to be added at the end of the slanted/italic text ({slhape lorem ipsumf/} dolor
not {slshape/ lorem ipsumf} dolor
). Here the {slshape}
is not a group that prints anything, it is the argument of a command that determines the formatting of the theorem later.
You can disable the warning by adding a comment with checktex 6
in the offending line
newtheoremstyle{thm-sl}
{}{}
{slshape}% chktex 6
{}
{bfseries}
{.}
{.5em}
{}
See §6.1.4 of the ChkTeX documentation.
Since you are probably going to use only the text...{...}
macros instead of their switches (textit
–itshape
etc.) in the document you could probably disable the entire warning 6 altogether. The documentation has more hints on that (-n6
command line option or chktexrc
config file).
Automatic syntax checkers or linters don't (and maybe can't) always get everything right.
In this case there is no need for italic correction with slshape
since the following text will start in a new line and not directly after the slanted text in the same line. Anyway, it would certainly be inappropriate to add /
directly after slshape
here since the correction needs to be added at the end of the slanted/italic text ({slhape lorem ipsumf/} dolor
not {slshape/ lorem ipsumf} dolor
). Here the {slshape}
is not a group that prints anything, it is the argument of a command that determines the formatting of the theorem later.
You can disable the warning by adding a comment with checktex 6
in the offending line
newtheoremstyle{thm-sl}
{}{}
{slshape}% chktex 6
{}
{bfseries}
{.}
{.5em}
{}
See §6.1.4 of the ChkTeX documentation.
Since you are probably going to use only the text...{...}
macros instead of their switches (textit
–itshape
etc.) in the document you could probably disable the entire warning 6 altogether. The documentation has more hints on that (-n6
command line option or chktexrc
config file).
edited Jan 13 at 14:32
answered Jan 13 at 14:01
moewemoewe
89.1k9110339
89.1k9110339
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469942%2fchktex-complains-about-no-italic-correction-found-how-to-fix-this%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
I guess in that case you just don't want to keep
chktex
happy. These automatic tools can't always get everything right.– moewe
Jan 13 at 12:14
1
Apparently you should be able to silence the warning by adding
% chktex 6
after the{slshape}
(haven't tested that).– moewe
Jan 13 at 12:40
Yep that works, thanks!
– red_trumpet
Jan 13 at 12:48
I'm not even sure why
chktex
examines things in the preamble.– egreg
Jan 13 at 14:23