Closed form of $int_0^infty sin(x)sinleft(frac{1}{x}right)dx$?












3












$begingroup$


I have stumbled onto an interesting integral$$int_0^infty sin(x)sinleft(frac{1}{x}right)dx$$ which I noticed graphically that it appears to be $1$, but I have no idea on how to evaluate it. Maybe it could be done with the use of Bessel Functions? Any help is appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    WolframAlpha gives the numerical approximation of $.905917$.
    $endgroup$
    – Cheerful Parsnip
    Jan 10 at 3:59










  • $begingroup$
    Oh, i see. I assumed it to be $1$ but in this case it might be another value expressable in terms of special functions.
    $endgroup$
    – aleden
    Jan 10 at 4:02
















3












$begingroup$


I have stumbled onto an interesting integral$$int_0^infty sin(x)sinleft(frac{1}{x}right)dx$$ which I noticed graphically that it appears to be $1$, but I have no idea on how to evaluate it. Maybe it could be done with the use of Bessel Functions? Any help is appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    WolframAlpha gives the numerical approximation of $.905917$.
    $endgroup$
    – Cheerful Parsnip
    Jan 10 at 3:59










  • $begingroup$
    Oh, i see. I assumed it to be $1$ but in this case it might be another value expressable in terms of special functions.
    $endgroup$
    – aleden
    Jan 10 at 4:02














3












3








3





$begingroup$


I have stumbled onto an interesting integral$$int_0^infty sin(x)sinleft(frac{1}{x}right)dx$$ which I noticed graphically that it appears to be $1$, but I have no idea on how to evaluate it. Maybe it could be done with the use of Bessel Functions? Any help is appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have stumbled onto an interesting integral$$int_0^infty sin(x)sinleft(frac{1}{x}right)dx$$ which I noticed graphically that it appears to be $1$, but I have no idea on how to evaluate it. Maybe it could be done with the use of Bessel Functions? Any help is appreciated.







integration definite-integrals improper-integrals closed-form bessel-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 13 at 12:44









Zacky

6,0601857




6,0601857










asked Jan 10 at 3:33









aledenaleden

2,032511




2,032511








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    WolframAlpha gives the numerical approximation of $.905917$.
    $endgroup$
    – Cheerful Parsnip
    Jan 10 at 3:59










  • $begingroup$
    Oh, i see. I assumed it to be $1$ but in this case it might be another value expressable in terms of special functions.
    $endgroup$
    – aleden
    Jan 10 at 4:02














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    WolframAlpha gives the numerical approximation of $.905917$.
    $endgroup$
    – Cheerful Parsnip
    Jan 10 at 3:59










  • $begingroup$
    Oh, i see. I assumed it to be $1$ but in this case it might be another value expressable in terms of special functions.
    $endgroup$
    – aleden
    Jan 10 at 4:02








1




1




$begingroup$
WolframAlpha gives the numerical approximation of $.905917$.
$endgroup$
– Cheerful Parsnip
Jan 10 at 3:59




$begingroup$
WolframAlpha gives the numerical approximation of $.905917$.
$endgroup$
– Cheerful Parsnip
Jan 10 at 3:59












$begingroup$
Oh, i see. I assumed it to be $1$ but in this case it might be another value expressable in terms of special functions.
$endgroup$
– aleden
Jan 10 at 4:02




$begingroup$
Oh, i see. I assumed it to be $1$ but in this case it might be another value expressable in terms of special functions.
$endgroup$
– aleden
Jan 10 at 4:02










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















9












$begingroup$

I'm pretty sure I remember doing this one before...



Ah, there it is. AoPS link.



Quoting myself:




Well, you can't just leave it there. This one definitely deserves more than just an answer.



Now, trying to work out an actual solution - $1$ is not a special point for $sin$. There's nothing special about picking $frac1x$ there - so, to give ourselves more handles to work with, we stretch the problem. Define
$$F(a) = int_0^{infty}sin(x)sinleft(frac{a}{x}right),dx$$
Now, we would like to differentiate $F$. Differentiating under the integral sign gets us $F'(a) stackrel{?}{=} int_0^{infty}frac1xsin(x)cosleft(frac{a}{x}right),dx$ and then $F''(a) stackrel{?}{=} int_0^{infty}frac{-1}{x^2}sin(x)sinleft(frac{a}{x}right),dx$, while substituting $t=frac{a}x$ gets us $F(a) = int_{infty}^{0}sinleft(frac{a}{t}right)sin(t)cdotfrac{-a}{t^2},dt stackrel{?}{=} -aF''(a)$.



Why the question marks? Because I'm doing things with conditionally convergent integrals that I would need absolute convergence to justify.

It's still informative. That's not the Bessel differential equation, but it's related - looking at the power series, we would get a Bessel function of $2sqrt{a}$. In light of that, let's redefine:
$$G(a) = int_0^{infty}sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx$$
Now, we need to massage this into a form that will let us justify the differentiation. First, split at $x=a$ and fold with that substitution:
begin{align*}G(a) &= int_0^a sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx + int_a^{infty} sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
&= int_0^a sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx + int_a^0 sinleft(frac{a^2}{t}right)sin(t)cdotfrac{-a^2}{t^2},dt\
&= int_0^a sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx + int_0^a frac{a^2}{x^2}sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
G(a) &= int_0^a left(1+frac{a^2}{x^2}right)sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dxend{align*}

This form is improper at zero due to the rapid growth (balanced by oscillation), so we integrate by parts:
begin{align*}G(a) &= int_0^a left(1+frac{a^2}{x^2}right)sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
&,_{dv = tfrac{a^2}{x^2}sintfrac{a^2}{x},dx,quad v = costfrac{a^2}{x}}^{u = (tfrac{x^2}{a^2}+1)sin x,quad du = (tfrac{x^2}{a^2}+1)cos x + tfrac{2x}{a^2}sin x,dx}\
G(a) &= left[left(frac{x^2}{a^2}+1right)sin xcosfrac{a^2}{x}right]_{x=0}^{x=a} - int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}left(left(frac{x^2}{a^2}+1right)cos x + frac{2x}{a^2}sin xright),dx\
&= sin(2a) - int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}left(left(frac{x^2}{a^2}+1right)cos x + frac{2x}{a^2}sin xright),dxend{align*}

This form is now absolutely convergent; it's the integral of a bounded function on a bounded interval, continuous except at one endpoint. If we differentiate it - well, then we get terms in which we multiply by $frac{2a}{x}$, and it's improper again. Only the $cosfrac{a^2}{x}cos x$ term causes trouble, so let's separate that out:
$$G(a) = sin(2a) - int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}left(frac{x^2}{a^2}cos x + frac{2x}{a^2}sin xright),dx - int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}cos x,dx$$
begin{align*}int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}cos x,dx &= left[-frac{x^2}{a^2}cos xsinfrac{a^2}{x}right]_{x=0}^{x=a} + int_0^a sinfrac{a^2}{x}left(frac{2x}{a^2}cos x - frac{x^2}{a^2}sin(x)right),dx\
G(a) &= frac32sin(2a) -int_0^a frac{x^2}{a^2}cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + frac{2x}{a^2}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dxend{align*}

That's a lot of trig identities that go into that last line - mostly the angle-sum identities, which our manipulation was nice enough to set up for us cleanly.



And now, we can finally differentiate cleanly.
begin{align*}G(a) &= frac32sin(2a) -int_0^a frac{x^2}{a^2}cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + frac{2x}{a^2}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
G'(a) &= 3cos(2a) - cos(2a) - frac{2}{a}sin(2a)\
&quad+int_0^a frac{2x^2}{a^3}cosleft(*right) + frac{2x}{a}sinleft(*right) + frac{4x}{a^3}sinleft(*right) - frac{4}{a}cosleft(*right),dx\
G'(a) &= 2cos(2a) -frac{2}{a}sin(2a)\
&quad + int_0^a left(frac{2x^2}{a^3}-frac{4}{a}right)cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + left(frac{2x}{a} + frac{4x}{a^3}right)sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dxend{align*}

And now... we'd like to differentiate again, but one of the terms doesn't have any powers of $x$ to cushion it, and differentiating it will break absolute convergence. Separate it out and integrate by parts again:
begin{align*}int_0^a frac{x^2}{a^3}left(1-frac{a^2}{x^2}right)cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx &= left[frac{x^2}{a^3}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right)right]_{x=0}^{x=a} - int_0^a frac{2x}{a^3}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
&= frac{1}{a}sin(2a) - int_0^a frac{2x}{a^3}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dxend{align*}

Multiply by $4$ and add/subtract, to clear the $frac{4}{a}cos(*)$ term:
begin{align*} G'(a) &= 2cos(2a) + frac{2}{a}sin(2a) + int_0^a -frac{2x^2}{a^3}cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + left(frac{2x}{a} - frac{4x}{a^3}right)sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
G'(a) &= 2cos(2a) - frac1asin(2a) + frac2a G(a) + int_0^a frac{2x}{a}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
G''(a) &= -4sin(2a) - frac2acos(2a) + frac1{a^2}sin(2a) -frac2{a^2} G(a) + frac2a G'(a) + 2sin(2a)\
&quad + int_0^a 4cos(*) - frac{2x}{a^2}sin(*),dx\
G''(a) &= -2sin(2a) + frac1{a^2}sin(2a) - frac2acos(2a) -frac2{a^2} G(a) + frac2a G'(a)\
&quad + int_0^a 4cos(*) - frac{2x}{a^2}sin(*),dxend{align*}

Now, we deal with those integrals. From an integration by parts earlier, $int_0^a (x^2-a^2)cos(*) + 2xsin(*),dx = a^2sin(2a)$. From our expression for $G$, $int_0^a x^2cos(*) + 2xsin(*) = frac{3a^2}{2}sin(2a)-a^2 G(a)$. Subtract the two, divide by $a^2$, and $int_0^a cos(*),dx = frac12sin(2a) - G(a)$. Similarly, from our latest expression for $G'$, $int_0^a xsin(*),dx = frac{a}{2}G'(a) - G(a) - acos(2a) + frac12sin(2a)$. Apply these to the formula for $G''$, and
begin{align*}G''(a) &= -2sin(2a) + frac1{a^2}sin(2a) - frac2acos(2a) - frac2{a^2}G(a) + frac2{a}G'(a) +\
&quad 2sin(2a) - 4 G(a) - frac1a G'(a) + frac2{a^2}G(a) + frac2acos(2a) - frac1{a^2}sin(2a)\
G''(a) &= frac1{a}G'(a) - 4 G(a) end{align*}

This almost looks like a stretched Bessel equation of order zero - but the middle term has the wrong sign, and that's not something we can change by just flipping the sign of $x$ or something.
No, the way to change that middle term is to multiply the function by powers of $x$. Combining with that stretch, let $H(t)=frac1t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right)$. Then $H'(t)=frac{1}{2t}G'left(frac{t}{2}right)-frac1{t^2}Gleft(frac{t}{2}right)$, $H''(t)=frac{1}{4t}G''left(frac{t}{2}right)-frac1{t^2}G'left(frac{t}{2}right)+frac{2}{t^3}Gleft(frac{t}{2}right)$, and
begin{align*}t^2 H''(t) + t H(t) + (t^2-1)H(t) &= frac{t}{4}G''left(frac{t}{2}right)-G'left(frac{t}{2}right)+frac2t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right) + frac12G'left(frac{t}{2}right)\
&quad - frac1t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right) + t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right) - frac1t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right)\
&= frac{t}{4}G''left(frac{t}{2}right) - frac12 G'left(frac{t}{2}right) + tGleft(frac{t}{2}right)\
&stackrel{s=t/2}{=} frac{s}{2}left(G''(s) -frac1s G'(s) + 4 G(s)right) = 0end{align*}
That equation for $H(t)$ is the Bessel equation of order $1$.



Now, we still need an initial condition. What is $G(0)$? Well, our equation degenerates there in several ways, but we can take a limit:
begin{align*}lim_{ato 0^+}G(a) &= lim_{ato 0^+}frac32sin(2a) -lim_{ato 0^+}int_0^a frac{x^2}{a^2}cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + frac{2x}{a^2}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
&= 0 - lim_{ato 0^+}int_0^1 left(t^2cosleft(at+frac{a}{t}right) + frac{2t}{a}sinleft(at+frac{a}{t}right)right)cdot a,dt = 0end{align*}

The first part of that integral is bounded by $at^2$, which tends to zero uniformly. For the second part, we use $|sin(x)|le |x|$; it's bounded by $2at^2 + 2a$, which also goes to zero uniformly.
But that's not enough - we're going to divide by $x$ at least once. We go one step stronger, and look at $lim_{ato 0^+}frac1a G(a)$. The $sin$ term gets us $3$. In the integral term, the integrand tends to $t^2cos(0) + 2t^2+2$ pointwise; by dominated convergence (using the same estimates as before), $lim_{ato 0^+}frac1a G(a) = 3 - 3 = 0$. That... well, that tells us $H$ is a multiple of the standard Bessel function $J_1$. We need to go another degree higher to find what multiple.
For that, the expression we're working with isn't terribly convenient, so we go back to a much earlier one:
begin{align*}G(a) &= int_0^a left(1+frac{a^2}{x^2}right)sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
frac1{a^2}G(a) &= int_0^1 left(frac1{a^2}+frac1{a^2t^2}right)sin(at)sinfrac{a}{t}cdot a,dt\
frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_0^1 frac{t^2+1}{at^2}cdot atcdot sinfrac{a}{t},dt\
frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_0^1 left(t+frac1tright)sinfrac{a}{t},dtend{align*}

As $ato 0^+$, that last form of the integrand tends to zero. The $tsinfrac{a}{t}$ term tends to zero uniformly, while the other term is large enough to matter at zero. Now, we substitute:
begin{align*}frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_0^1 frac1tsinfrac{a}{t},dt\
&,^{t=tfrac{a}{x}}_{dt=-tfrac{a}{x^2},dx}\
frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_{infty}^{a} -frac{x}{a}sin(x)cdotfrac{a}{x^2},dx\
frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_a^{infty} frac{sin x}{x},dx = frac{pi}{2}end{align*}

That's our limit - $lim_{ato 0^+} frac1{a^2}G(a)=frac{pi}{2}$. For normalization, note that $J_1(t)approx frac{t}{2}$ for $t$ near zero. Then $H(2a)approx frac1{2a}G(a) approx frac{pi}{4}a$, and thus $H(2a)=frac{pi}{4}J_1(2a)$. Converting back to $G$, $G(a) = 2a H(2a) = frac{pi a}{2}J_1(2a)$.
The original question asked was $G(1)$, for an integral of $frac{pi}{2} J_1(2)$. The answer is confirmed... and it only took me most of a day to get there.




Doing it a second time? It took longer to find the old post than to reedit it for this site's formatting.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Wow, what a process!
    $endgroup$
    – aleden
    Jan 10 at 4:42










  • $begingroup$
    It certainly was. There's a reason the thread I linked had a gap of more than two days between the previous post and the argument I reproduced here. It's softened a bit by the roadmap from the beginning - by differentiating under the integral sign, we can see what the answers should be. Then from there, we need to find equivalent forms with better convergence behavior so as to justify that technique; the calculations to make that work are the bulk of it.
    $endgroup$
    – jmerry
    Jan 10 at 4:59



















6












$begingroup$

Maple gets the answer
$$ frac{pi}{2} J_1(2) $$
where $J_1$ is the Bessel function of first order. It says it used the "meijerg" method.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    So it could probably be expressed in terms of the Meijer G Function and then simplified to this Bessel Function?
    $endgroup$
    – aleden
    Jan 10 at 4:07










  • $begingroup$
    This agrees with the numerical value obtained by Wolfram.
    $endgroup$
    – Cheerful Parsnip
    Jan 10 at 4:11



















3












$begingroup$

Consider



$$F(a,b) = int_0^{infty}sin(ax)sinleft(frac{b}{x}right),dx$$



Now, the Laplace transform of $F$ as a function of $b$,



$$mathcal{L}(F)=int_0^{infty}frac{xsin(ax)}{1+s^2x^2}=frac{pi}{2}frac{e^{-frac{a}{s}}}{s^2}$$



The last integral is computed in this site many times.



Finally, to invert the Laplace transform to recover $F(a,b)$ we use the inspection method.



That means that we'll look at the table Laplace transform pairs.



In this case we have good luck,



$$F(a,b) =frac{pi}{2}sqrtfrac{b}{a}J_1(2sqrt{ab})$$



where $J_1(x)$ is the Bessel Function of the First Kind






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068201%2fclosed-form-of-int-0-infty-sinx-sin-left-frac1x-rightdx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    9












    $begingroup$

    I'm pretty sure I remember doing this one before...



    Ah, there it is. AoPS link.



    Quoting myself:




    Well, you can't just leave it there. This one definitely deserves more than just an answer.



    Now, trying to work out an actual solution - $1$ is not a special point for $sin$. There's nothing special about picking $frac1x$ there - so, to give ourselves more handles to work with, we stretch the problem. Define
    $$F(a) = int_0^{infty}sin(x)sinleft(frac{a}{x}right),dx$$
    Now, we would like to differentiate $F$. Differentiating under the integral sign gets us $F'(a) stackrel{?}{=} int_0^{infty}frac1xsin(x)cosleft(frac{a}{x}right),dx$ and then $F''(a) stackrel{?}{=} int_0^{infty}frac{-1}{x^2}sin(x)sinleft(frac{a}{x}right),dx$, while substituting $t=frac{a}x$ gets us $F(a) = int_{infty}^{0}sinleft(frac{a}{t}right)sin(t)cdotfrac{-a}{t^2},dt stackrel{?}{=} -aF''(a)$.



    Why the question marks? Because I'm doing things with conditionally convergent integrals that I would need absolute convergence to justify.

    It's still informative. That's not the Bessel differential equation, but it's related - looking at the power series, we would get a Bessel function of $2sqrt{a}$. In light of that, let's redefine:
    $$G(a) = int_0^{infty}sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx$$
    Now, we need to massage this into a form that will let us justify the differentiation. First, split at $x=a$ and fold with that substitution:
    begin{align*}G(a) &= int_0^a sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx + int_a^{infty} sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    &= int_0^a sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx + int_a^0 sinleft(frac{a^2}{t}right)sin(t)cdotfrac{-a^2}{t^2},dt\
    &= int_0^a sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx + int_0^a frac{a^2}{x^2}sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    G(a) &= int_0^a left(1+frac{a^2}{x^2}right)sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dxend{align*}

    This form is improper at zero due to the rapid growth (balanced by oscillation), so we integrate by parts:
    begin{align*}G(a) &= int_0^a left(1+frac{a^2}{x^2}right)sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    &,_{dv = tfrac{a^2}{x^2}sintfrac{a^2}{x},dx,quad v = costfrac{a^2}{x}}^{u = (tfrac{x^2}{a^2}+1)sin x,quad du = (tfrac{x^2}{a^2}+1)cos x + tfrac{2x}{a^2}sin x,dx}\
    G(a) &= left[left(frac{x^2}{a^2}+1right)sin xcosfrac{a^2}{x}right]_{x=0}^{x=a} - int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}left(left(frac{x^2}{a^2}+1right)cos x + frac{2x}{a^2}sin xright),dx\
    &= sin(2a) - int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}left(left(frac{x^2}{a^2}+1right)cos x + frac{2x}{a^2}sin xright),dxend{align*}

    This form is now absolutely convergent; it's the integral of a bounded function on a bounded interval, continuous except at one endpoint. If we differentiate it - well, then we get terms in which we multiply by $frac{2a}{x}$, and it's improper again. Only the $cosfrac{a^2}{x}cos x$ term causes trouble, so let's separate that out:
    $$G(a) = sin(2a) - int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}left(frac{x^2}{a^2}cos x + frac{2x}{a^2}sin xright),dx - int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}cos x,dx$$
    begin{align*}int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}cos x,dx &= left[-frac{x^2}{a^2}cos xsinfrac{a^2}{x}right]_{x=0}^{x=a} + int_0^a sinfrac{a^2}{x}left(frac{2x}{a^2}cos x - frac{x^2}{a^2}sin(x)right),dx\
    G(a) &= frac32sin(2a) -int_0^a frac{x^2}{a^2}cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + frac{2x}{a^2}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dxend{align*}

    That's a lot of trig identities that go into that last line - mostly the angle-sum identities, which our manipulation was nice enough to set up for us cleanly.



    And now, we can finally differentiate cleanly.
    begin{align*}G(a) &= frac32sin(2a) -int_0^a frac{x^2}{a^2}cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + frac{2x}{a^2}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    G'(a) &= 3cos(2a) - cos(2a) - frac{2}{a}sin(2a)\
    &quad+int_0^a frac{2x^2}{a^3}cosleft(*right) + frac{2x}{a}sinleft(*right) + frac{4x}{a^3}sinleft(*right) - frac{4}{a}cosleft(*right),dx\
    G'(a) &= 2cos(2a) -frac{2}{a}sin(2a)\
    &quad + int_0^a left(frac{2x^2}{a^3}-frac{4}{a}right)cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + left(frac{2x}{a} + frac{4x}{a^3}right)sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dxend{align*}

    And now... we'd like to differentiate again, but one of the terms doesn't have any powers of $x$ to cushion it, and differentiating it will break absolute convergence. Separate it out and integrate by parts again:
    begin{align*}int_0^a frac{x^2}{a^3}left(1-frac{a^2}{x^2}right)cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx &= left[frac{x^2}{a^3}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right)right]_{x=0}^{x=a} - int_0^a frac{2x}{a^3}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    &= frac{1}{a}sin(2a) - int_0^a frac{2x}{a^3}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dxend{align*}

    Multiply by $4$ and add/subtract, to clear the $frac{4}{a}cos(*)$ term:
    begin{align*} G'(a) &= 2cos(2a) + frac{2}{a}sin(2a) + int_0^a -frac{2x^2}{a^3}cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + left(frac{2x}{a} - frac{4x}{a^3}right)sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    G'(a) &= 2cos(2a) - frac1asin(2a) + frac2a G(a) + int_0^a frac{2x}{a}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    G''(a) &= -4sin(2a) - frac2acos(2a) + frac1{a^2}sin(2a) -frac2{a^2} G(a) + frac2a G'(a) + 2sin(2a)\
    &quad + int_0^a 4cos(*) - frac{2x}{a^2}sin(*),dx\
    G''(a) &= -2sin(2a) + frac1{a^2}sin(2a) - frac2acos(2a) -frac2{a^2} G(a) + frac2a G'(a)\
    &quad + int_0^a 4cos(*) - frac{2x}{a^2}sin(*),dxend{align*}

    Now, we deal with those integrals. From an integration by parts earlier, $int_0^a (x^2-a^2)cos(*) + 2xsin(*),dx = a^2sin(2a)$. From our expression for $G$, $int_0^a x^2cos(*) + 2xsin(*) = frac{3a^2}{2}sin(2a)-a^2 G(a)$. Subtract the two, divide by $a^2$, and $int_0^a cos(*),dx = frac12sin(2a) - G(a)$. Similarly, from our latest expression for $G'$, $int_0^a xsin(*),dx = frac{a}{2}G'(a) - G(a) - acos(2a) + frac12sin(2a)$. Apply these to the formula for $G''$, and
    begin{align*}G''(a) &= -2sin(2a) + frac1{a^2}sin(2a) - frac2acos(2a) - frac2{a^2}G(a) + frac2{a}G'(a) +\
    &quad 2sin(2a) - 4 G(a) - frac1a G'(a) + frac2{a^2}G(a) + frac2acos(2a) - frac1{a^2}sin(2a)\
    G''(a) &= frac1{a}G'(a) - 4 G(a) end{align*}

    This almost looks like a stretched Bessel equation of order zero - but the middle term has the wrong sign, and that's not something we can change by just flipping the sign of $x$ or something.
    No, the way to change that middle term is to multiply the function by powers of $x$. Combining with that stretch, let $H(t)=frac1t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right)$. Then $H'(t)=frac{1}{2t}G'left(frac{t}{2}right)-frac1{t^2}Gleft(frac{t}{2}right)$, $H''(t)=frac{1}{4t}G''left(frac{t}{2}right)-frac1{t^2}G'left(frac{t}{2}right)+frac{2}{t^3}Gleft(frac{t}{2}right)$, and
    begin{align*}t^2 H''(t) + t H(t) + (t^2-1)H(t) &= frac{t}{4}G''left(frac{t}{2}right)-G'left(frac{t}{2}right)+frac2t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right) + frac12G'left(frac{t}{2}right)\
    &quad - frac1t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right) + t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right) - frac1t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right)\
    &= frac{t}{4}G''left(frac{t}{2}right) - frac12 G'left(frac{t}{2}right) + tGleft(frac{t}{2}right)\
    &stackrel{s=t/2}{=} frac{s}{2}left(G''(s) -frac1s G'(s) + 4 G(s)right) = 0end{align*}
    That equation for $H(t)$ is the Bessel equation of order $1$.



    Now, we still need an initial condition. What is $G(0)$? Well, our equation degenerates there in several ways, but we can take a limit:
    begin{align*}lim_{ato 0^+}G(a) &= lim_{ato 0^+}frac32sin(2a) -lim_{ato 0^+}int_0^a frac{x^2}{a^2}cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + frac{2x}{a^2}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    &= 0 - lim_{ato 0^+}int_0^1 left(t^2cosleft(at+frac{a}{t}right) + frac{2t}{a}sinleft(at+frac{a}{t}right)right)cdot a,dt = 0end{align*}

    The first part of that integral is bounded by $at^2$, which tends to zero uniformly. For the second part, we use $|sin(x)|le |x|$; it's bounded by $2at^2 + 2a$, which also goes to zero uniformly.
    But that's not enough - we're going to divide by $x$ at least once. We go one step stronger, and look at $lim_{ato 0^+}frac1a G(a)$. The $sin$ term gets us $3$. In the integral term, the integrand tends to $t^2cos(0) + 2t^2+2$ pointwise; by dominated convergence (using the same estimates as before), $lim_{ato 0^+}frac1a G(a) = 3 - 3 = 0$. That... well, that tells us $H$ is a multiple of the standard Bessel function $J_1$. We need to go another degree higher to find what multiple.
    For that, the expression we're working with isn't terribly convenient, so we go back to a much earlier one:
    begin{align*}G(a) &= int_0^a left(1+frac{a^2}{x^2}right)sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    frac1{a^2}G(a) &= int_0^1 left(frac1{a^2}+frac1{a^2t^2}right)sin(at)sinfrac{a}{t}cdot a,dt\
    frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_0^1 frac{t^2+1}{at^2}cdot atcdot sinfrac{a}{t},dt\
    frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_0^1 left(t+frac1tright)sinfrac{a}{t},dtend{align*}

    As $ato 0^+$, that last form of the integrand tends to zero. The $tsinfrac{a}{t}$ term tends to zero uniformly, while the other term is large enough to matter at zero. Now, we substitute:
    begin{align*}frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_0^1 frac1tsinfrac{a}{t},dt\
    &,^{t=tfrac{a}{x}}_{dt=-tfrac{a}{x^2},dx}\
    frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_{infty}^{a} -frac{x}{a}sin(x)cdotfrac{a}{x^2},dx\
    frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_a^{infty} frac{sin x}{x},dx = frac{pi}{2}end{align*}

    That's our limit - $lim_{ato 0^+} frac1{a^2}G(a)=frac{pi}{2}$. For normalization, note that $J_1(t)approx frac{t}{2}$ for $t$ near zero. Then $H(2a)approx frac1{2a}G(a) approx frac{pi}{4}a$, and thus $H(2a)=frac{pi}{4}J_1(2a)$. Converting back to $G$, $G(a) = 2a H(2a) = frac{pi a}{2}J_1(2a)$.
    The original question asked was $G(1)$, for an integral of $frac{pi}{2} J_1(2)$. The answer is confirmed... and it only took me most of a day to get there.




    Doing it a second time? It took longer to find the old post than to reedit it for this site's formatting.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Wow, what a process!
      $endgroup$
      – aleden
      Jan 10 at 4:42










    • $begingroup$
      It certainly was. There's a reason the thread I linked had a gap of more than two days between the previous post and the argument I reproduced here. It's softened a bit by the roadmap from the beginning - by differentiating under the integral sign, we can see what the answers should be. Then from there, we need to find equivalent forms with better convergence behavior so as to justify that technique; the calculations to make that work are the bulk of it.
      $endgroup$
      – jmerry
      Jan 10 at 4:59
















    9












    $begingroup$

    I'm pretty sure I remember doing this one before...



    Ah, there it is. AoPS link.



    Quoting myself:




    Well, you can't just leave it there. This one definitely deserves more than just an answer.



    Now, trying to work out an actual solution - $1$ is not a special point for $sin$. There's nothing special about picking $frac1x$ there - so, to give ourselves more handles to work with, we stretch the problem. Define
    $$F(a) = int_0^{infty}sin(x)sinleft(frac{a}{x}right),dx$$
    Now, we would like to differentiate $F$. Differentiating under the integral sign gets us $F'(a) stackrel{?}{=} int_0^{infty}frac1xsin(x)cosleft(frac{a}{x}right),dx$ and then $F''(a) stackrel{?}{=} int_0^{infty}frac{-1}{x^2}sin(x)sinleft(frac{a}{x}right),dx$, while substituting $t=frac{a}x$ gets us $F(a) = int_{infty}^{0}sinleft(frac{a}{t}right)sin(t)cdotfrac{-a}{t^2},dt stackrel{?}{=} -aF''(a)$.



    Why the question marks? Because I'm doing things with conditionally convergent integrals that I would need absolute convergence to justify.

    It's still informative. That's not the Bessel differential equation, but it's related - looking at the power series, we would get a Bessel function of $2sqrt{a}$. In light of that, let's redefine:
    $$G(a) = int_0^{infty}sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx$$
    Now, we need to massage this into a form that will let us justify the differentiation. First, split at $x=a$ and fold with that substitution:
    begin{align*}G(a) &= int_0^a sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx + int_a^{infty} sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    &= int_0^a sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx + int_a^0 sinleft(frac{a^2}{t}right)sin(t)cdotfrac{-a^2}{t^2},dt\
    &= int_0^a sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx + int_0^a frac{a^2}{x^2}sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    G(a) &= int_0^a left(1+frac{a^2}{x^2}right)sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dxend{align*}

    This form is improper at zero due to the rapid growth (balanced by oscillation), so we integrate by parts:
    begin{align*}G(a) &= int_0^a left(1+frac{a^2}{x^2}right)sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    &,_{dv = tfrac{a^2}{x^2}sintfrac{a^2}{x},dx,quad v = costfrac{a^2}{x}}^{u = (tfrac{x^2}{a^2}+1)sin x,quad du = (tfrac{x^2}{a^2}+1)cos x + tfrac{2x}{a^2}sin x,dx}\
    G(a) &= left[left(frac{x^2}{a^2}+1right)sin xcosfrac{a^2}{x}right]_{x=0}^{x=a} - int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}left(left(frac{x^2}{a^2}+1right)cos x + frac{2x}{a^2}sin xright),dx\
    &= sin(2a) - int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}left(left(frac{x^2}{a^2}+1right)cos x + frac{2x}{a^2}sin xright),dxend{align*}

    This form is now absolutely convergent; it's the integral of a bounded function on a bounded interval, continuous except at one endpoint. If we differentiate it - well, then we get terms in which we multiply by $frac{2a}{x}$, and it's improper again. Only the $cosfrac{a^2}{x}cos x$ term causes trouble, so let's separate that out:
    $$G(a) = sin(2a) - int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}left(frac{x^2}{a^2}cos x + frac{2x}{a^2}sin xright),dx - int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}cos x,dx$$
    begin{align*}int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}cos x,dx &= left[-frac{x^2}{a^2}cos xsinfrac{a^2}{x}right]_{x=0}^{x=a} + int_0^a sinfrac{a^2}{x}left(frac{2x}{a^2}cos x - frac{x^2}{a^2}sin(x)right),dx\
    G(a) &= frac32sin(2a) -int_0^a frac{x^2}{a^2}cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + frac{2x}{a^2}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dxend{align*}

    That's a lot of trig identities that go into that last line - mostly the angle-sum identities, which our manipulation was nice enough to set up for us cleanly.



    And now, we can finally differentiate cleanly.
    begin{align*}G(a) &= frac32sin(2a) -int_0^a frac{x^2}{a^2}cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + frac{2x}{a^2}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    G'(a) &= 3cos(2a) - cos(2a) - frac{2}{a}sin(2a)\
    &quad+int_0^a frac{2x^2}{a^3}cosleft(*right) + frac{2x}{a}sinleft(*right) + frac{4x}{a^3}sinleft(*right) - frac{4}{a}cosleft(*right),dx\
    G'(a) &= 2cos(2a) -frac{2}{a}sin(2a)\
    &quad + int_0^a left(frac{2x^2}{a^3}-frac{4}{a}right)cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + left(frac{2x}{a} + frac{4x}{a^3}right)sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dxend{align*}

    And now... we'd like to differentiate again, but one of the terms doesn't have any powers of $x$ to cushion it, and differentiating it will break absolute convergence. Separate it out and integrate by parts again:
    begin{align*}int_0^a frac{x^2}{a^3}left(1-frac{a^2}{x^2}right)cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx &= left[frac{x^2}{a^3}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right)right]_{x=0}^{x=a} - int_0^a frac{2x}{a^3}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    &= frac{1}{a}sin(2a) - int_0^a frac{2x}{a^3}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dxend{align*}

    Multiply by $4$ and add/subtract, to clear the $frac{4}{a}cos(*)$ term:
    begin{align*} G'(a) &= 2cos(2a) + frac{2}{a}sin(2a) + int_0^a -frac{2x^2}{a^3}cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + left(frac{2x}{a} - frac{4x}{a^3}right)sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    G'(a) &= 2cos(2a) - frac1asin(2a) + frac2a G(a) + int_0^a frac{2x}{a}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    G''(a) &= -4sin(2a) - frac2acos(2a) + frac1{a^2}sin(2a) -frac2{a^2} G(a) + frac2a G'(a) + 2sin(2a)\
    &quad + int_0^a 4cos(*) - frac{2x}{a^2}sin(*),dx\
    G''(a) &= -2sin(2a) + frac1{a^2}sin(2a) - frac2acos(2a) -frac2{a^2} G(a) + frac2a G'(a)\
    &quad + int_0^a 4cos(*) - frac{2x}{a^2}sin(*),dxend{align*}

    Now, we deal with those integrals. From an integration by parts earlier, $int_0^a (x^2-a^2)cos(*) + 2xsin(*),dx = a^2sin(2a)$. From our expression for $G$, $int_0^a x^2cos(*) + 2xsin(*) = frac{3a^2}{2}sin(2a)-a^2 G(a)$. Subtract the two, divide by $a^2$, and $int_0^a cos(*),dx = frac12sin(2a) - G(a)$. Similarly, from our latest expression for $G'$, $int_0^a xsin(*),dx = frac{a}{2}G'(a) - G(a) - acos(2a) + frac12sin(2a)$. Apply these to the formula for $G''$, and
    begin{align*}G''(a) &= -2sin(2a) + frac1{a^2}sin(2a) - frac2acos(2a) - frac2{a^2}G(a) + frac2{a}G'(a) +\
    &quad 2sin(2a) - 4 G(a) - frac1a G'(a) + frac2{a^2}G(a) + frac2acos(2a) - frac1{a^2}sin(2a)\
    G''(a) &= frac1{a}G'(a) - 4 G(a) end{align*}

    This almost looks like a stretched Bessel equation of order zero - but the middle term has the wrong sign, and that's not something we can change by just flipping the sign of $x$ or something.
    No, the way to change that middle term is to multiply the function by powers of $x$. Combining with that stretch, let $H(t)=frac1t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right)$. Then $H'(t)=frac{1}{2t}G'left(frac{t}{2}right)-frac1{t^2}Gleft(frac{t}{2}right)$, $H''(t)=frac{1}{4t}G''left(frac{t}{2}right)-frac1{t^2}G'left(frac{t}{2}right)+frac{2}{t^3}Gleft(frac{t}{2}right)$, and
    begin{align*}t^2 H''(t) + t H(t) + (t^2-1)H(t) &= frac{t}{4}G''left(frac{t}{2}right)-G'left(frac{t}{2}right)+frac2t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right) + frac12G'left(frac{t}{2}right)\
    &quad - frac1t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right) + t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right) - frac1t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right)\
    &= frac{t}{4}G''left(frac{t}{2}right) - frac12 G'left(frac{t}{2}right) + tGleft(frac{t}{2}right)\
    &stackrel{s=t/2}{=} frac{s}{2}left(G''(s) -frac1s G'(s) + 4 G(s)right) = 0end{align*}
    That equation for $H(t)$ is the Bessel equation of order $1$.



    Now, we still need an initial condition. What is $G(0)$? Well, our equation degenerates there in several ways, but we can take a limit:
    begin{align*}lim_{ato 0^+}G(a) &= lim_{ato 0^+}frac32sin(2a) -lim_{ato 0^+}int_0^a frac{x^2}{a^2}cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + frac{2x}{a^2}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    &= 0 - lim_{ato 0^+}int_0^1 left(t^2cosleft(at+frac{a}{t}right) + frac{2t}{a}sinleft(at+frac{a}{t}right)right)cdot a,dt = 0end{align*}

    The first part of that integral is bounded by $at^2$, which tends to zero uniformly. For the second part, we use $|sin(x)|le |x|$; it's bounded by $2at^2 + 2a$, which also goes to zero uniformly.
    But that's not enough - we're going to divide by $x$ at least once. We go one step stronger, and look at $lim_{ato 0^+}frac1a G(a)$. The $sin$ term gets us $3$. In the integral term, the integrand tends to $t^2cos(0) + 2t^2+2$ pointwise; by dominated convergence (using the same estimates as before), $lim_{ato 0^+}frac1a G(a) = 3 - 3 = 0$. That... well, that tells us $H$ is a multiple of the standard Bessel function $J_1$. We need to go another degree higher to find what multiple.
    For that, the expression we're working with isn't terribly convenient, so we go back to a much earlier one:
    begin{align*}G(a) &= int_0^a left(1+frac{a^2}{x^2}right)sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    frac1{a^2}G(a) &= int_0^1 left(frac1{a^2}+frac1{a^2t^2}right)sin(at)sinfrac{a}{t}cdot a,dt\
    frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_0^1 frac{t^2+1}{at^2}cdot atcdot sinfrac{a}{t},dt\
    frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_0^1 left(t+frac1tright)sinfrac{a}{t},dtend{align*}

    As $ato 0^+$, that last form of the integrand tends to zero. The $tsinfrac{a}{t}$ term tends to zero uniformly, while the other term is large enough to matter at zero. Now, we substitute:
    begin{align*}frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_0^1 frac1tsinfrac{a}{t},dt\
    &,^{t=tfrac{a}{x}}_{dt=-tfrac{a}{x^2},dx}\
    frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_{infty}^{a} -frac{x}{a}sin(x)cdotfrac{a}{x^2},dx\
    frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_a^{infty} frac{sin x}{x},dx = frac{pi}{2}end{align*}

    That's our limit - $lim_{ato 0^+} frac1{a^2}G(a)=frac{pi}{2}$. For normalization, note that $J_1(t)approx frac{t}{2}$ for $t$ near zero. Then $H(2a)approx frac1{2a}G(a) approx frac{pi}{4}a$, and thus $H(2a)=frac{pi}{4}J_1(2a)$. Converting back to $G$, $G(a) = 2a H(2a) = frac{pi a}{2}J_1(2a)$.
    The original question asked was $G(1)$, for an integral of $frac{pi}{2} J_1(2)$. The answer is confirmed... and it only took me most of a day to get there.




    Doing it a second time? It took longer to find the old post than to reedit it for this site's formatting.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Wow, what a process!
      $endgroup$
      – aleden
      Jan 10 at 4:42










    • $begingroup$
      It certainly was. There's a reason the thread I linked had a gap of more than two days between the previous post and the argument I reproduced here. It's softened a bit by the roadmap from the beginning - by differentiating under the integral sign, we can see what the answers should be. Then from there, we need to find equivalent forms with better convergence behavior so as to justify that technique; the calculations to make that work are the bulk of it.
      $endgroup$
      – jmerry
      Jan 10 at 4:59














    9












    9








    9





    $begingroup$

    I'm pretty sure I remember doing this one before...



    Ah, there it is. AoPS link.



    Quoting myself:




    Well, you can't just leave it there. This one definitely deserves more than just an answer.



    Now, trying to work out an actual solution - $1$ is not a special point for $sin$. There's nothing special about picking $frac1x$ there - so, to give ourselves more handles to work with, we stretch the problem. Define
    $$F(a) = int_0^{infty}sin(x)sinleft(frac{a}{x}right),dx$$
    Now, we would like to differentiate $F$. Differentiating under the integral sign gets us $F'(a) stackrel{?}{=} int_0^{infty}frac1xsin(x)cosleft(frac{a}{x}right),dx$ and then $F''(a) stackrel{?}{=} int_0^{infty}frac{-1}{x^2}sin(x)sinleft(frac{a}{x}right),dx$, while substituting $t=frac{a}x$ gets us $F(a) = int_{infty}^{0}sinleft(frac{a}{t}right)sin(t)cdotfrac{-a}{t^2},dt stackrel{?}{=} -aF''(a)$.



    Why the question marks? Because I'm doing things with conditionally convergent integrals that I would need absolute convergence to justify.

    It's still informative. That's not the Bessel differential equation, but it's related - looking at the power series, we would get a Bessel function of $2sqrt{a}$. In light of that, let's redefine:
    $$G(a) = int_0^{infty}sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx$$
    Now, we need to massage this into a form that will let us justify the differentiation. First, split at $x=a$ and fold with that substitution:
    begin{align*}G(a) &= int_0^a sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx + int_a^{infty} sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    &= int_0^a sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx + int_a^0 sinleft(frac{a^2}{t}right)sin(t)cdotfrac{-a^2}{t^2},dt\
    &= int_0^a sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx + int_0^a frac{a^2}{x^2}sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    G(a) &= int_0^a left(1+frac{a^2}{x^2}right)sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dxend{align*}

    This form is improper at zero due to the rapid growth (balanced by oscillation), so we integrate by parts:
    begin{align*}G(a) &= int_0^a left(1+frac{a^2}{x^2}right)sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    &,_{dv = tfrac{a^2}{x^2}sintfrac{a^2}{x},dx,quad v = costfrac{a^2}{x}}^{u = (tfrac{x^2}{a^2}+1)sin x,quad du = (tfrac{x^2}{a^2}+1)cos x + tfrac{2x}{a^2}sin x,dx}\
    G(a) &= left[left(frac{x^2}{a^2}+1right)sin xcosfrac{a^2}{x}right]_{x=0}^{x=a} - int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}left(left(frac{x^2}{a^2}+1right)cos x + frac{2x}{a^2}sin xright),dx\
    &= sin(2a) - int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}left(left(frac{x^2}{a^2}+1right)cos x + frac{2x}{a^2}sin xright),dxend{align*}

    This form is now absolutely convergent; it's the integral of a bounded function on a bounded interval, continuous except at one endpoint. If we differentiate it - well, then we get terms in which we multiply by $frac{2a}{x}$, and it's improper again. Only the $cosfrac{a^2}{x}cos x$ term causes trouble, so let's separate that out:
    $$G(a) = sin(2a) - int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}left(frac{x^2}{a^2}cos x + frac{2x}{a^2}sin xright),dx - int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}cos x,dx$$
    begin{align*}int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}cos x,dx &= left[-frac{x^2}{a^2}cos xsinfrac{a^2}{x}right]_{x=0}^{x=a} + int_0^a sinfrac{a^2}{x}left(frac{2x}{a^2}cos x - frac{x^2}{a^2}sin(x)right),dx\
    G(a) &= frac32sin(2a) -int_0^a frac{x^2}{a^2}cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + frac{2x}{a^2}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dxend{align*}

    That's a lot of trig identities that go into that last line - mostly the angle-sum identities, which our manipulation was nice enough to set up for us cleanly.



    And now, we can finally differentiate cleanly.
    begin{align*}G(a) &= frac32sin(2a) -int_0^a frac{x^2}{a^2}cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + frac{2x}{a^2}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    G'(a) &= 3cos(2a) - cos(2a) - frac{2}{a}sin(2a)\
    &quad+int_0^a frac{2x^2}{a^3}cosleft(*right) + frac{2x}{a}sinleft(*right) + frac{4x}{a^3}sinleft(*right) - frac{4}{a}cosleft(*right),dx\
    G'(a) &= 2cos(2a) -frac{2}{a}sin(2a)\
    &quad + int_0^a left(frac{2x^2}{a^3}-frac{4}{a}right)cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + left(frac{2x}{a} + frac{4x}{a^3}right)sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dxend{align*}

    And now... we'd like to differentiate again, but one of the terms doesn't have any powers of $x$ to cushion it, and differentiating it will break absolute convergence. Separate it out and integrate by parts again:
    begin{align*}int_0^a frac{x^2}{a^3}left(1-frac{a^2}{x^2}right)cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx &= left[frac{x^2}{a^3}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right)right]_{x=0}^{x=a} - int_0^a frac{2x}{a^3}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    &= frac{1}{a}sin(2a) - int_0^a frac{2x}{a^3}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dxend{align*}

    Multiply by $4$ and add/subtract, to clear the $frac{4}{a}cos(*)$ term:
    begin{align*} G'(a) &= 2cos(2a) + frac{2}{a}sin(2a) + int_0^a -frac{2x^2}{a^3}cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + left(frac{2x}{a} - frac{4x}{a^3}right)sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    G'(a) &= 2cos(2a) - frac1asin(2a) + frac2a G(a) + int_0^a frac{2x}{a}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    G''(a) &= -4sin(2a) - frac2acos(2a) + frac1{a^2}sin(2a) -frac2{a^2} G(a) + frac2a G'(a) + 2sin(2a)\
    &quad + int_0^a 4cos(*) - frac{2x}{a^2}sin(*),dx\
    G''(a) &= -2sin(2a) + frac1{a^2}sin(2a) - frac2acos(2a) -frac2{a^2} G(a) + frac2a G'(a)\
    &quad + int_0^a 4cos(*) - frac{2x}{a^2}sin(*),dxend{align*}

    Now, we deal with those integrals. From an integration by parts earlier, $int_0^a (x^2-a^2)cos(*) + 2xsin(*),dx = a^2sin(2a)$. From our expression for $G$, $int_0^a x^2cos(*) + 2xsin(*) = frac{3a^2}{2}sin(2a)-a^2 G(a)$. Subtract the two, divide by $a^2$, and $int_0^a cos(*),dx = frac12sin(2a) - G(a)$. Similarly, from our latest expression for $G'$, $int_0^a xsin(*),dx = frac{a}{2}G'(a) - G(a) - acos(2a) + frac12sin(2a)$. Apply these to the formula for $G''$, and
    begin{align*}G''(a) &= -2sin(2a) + frac1{a^2}sin(2a) - frac2acos(2a) - frac2{a^2}G(a) + frac2{a}G'(a) +\
    &quad 2sin(2a) - 4 G(a) - frac1a G'(a) + frac2{a^2}G(a) + frac2acos(2a) - frac1{a^2}sin(2a)\
    G''(a) &= frac1{a}G'(a) - 4 G(a) end{align*}

    This almost looks like a stretched Bessel equation of order zero - but the middle term has the wrong sign, and that's not something we can change by just flipping the sign of $x$ or something.
    No, the way to change that middle term is to multiply the function by powers of $x$. Combining with that stretch, let $H(t)=frac1t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right)$. Then $H'(t)=frac{1}{2t}G'left(frac{t}{2}right)-frac1{t^2}Gleft(frac{t}{2}right)$, $H''(t)=frac{1}{4t}G''left(frac{t}{2}right)-frac1{t^2}G'left(frac{t}{2}right)+frac{2}{t^3}Gleft(frac{t}{2}right)$, and
    begin{align*}t^2 H''(t) + t H(t) + (t^2-1)H(t) &= frac{t}{4}G''left(frac{t}{2}right)-G'left(frac{t}{2}right)+frac2t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right) + frac12G'left(frac{t}{2}right)\
    &quad - frac1t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right) + t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right) - frac1t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right)\
    &= frac{t}{4}G''left(frac{t}{2}right) - frac12 G'left(frac{t}{2}right) + tGleft(frac{t}{2}right)\
    &stackrel{s=t/2}{=} frac{s}{2}left(G''(s) -frac1s G'(s) + 4 G(s)right) = 0end{align*}
    That equation for $H(t)$ is the Bessel equation of order $1$.



    Now, we still need an initial condition. What is $G(0)$? Well, our equation degenerates there in several ways, but we can take a limit:
    begin{align*}lim_{ato 0^+}G(a) &= lim_{ato 0^+}frac32sin(2a) -lim_{ato 0^+}int_0^a frac{x^2}{a^2}cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + frac{2x}{a^2}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    &= 0 - lim_{ato 0^+}int_0^1 left(t^2cosleft(at+frac{a}{t}right) + frac{2t}{a}sinleft(at+frac{a}{t}right)right)cdot a,dt = 0end{align*}

    The first part of that integral is bounded by $at^2$, which tends to zero uniformly. For the second part, we use $|sin(x)|le |x|$; it's bounded by $2at^2 + 2a$, which also goes to zero uniformly.
    But that's not enough - we're going to divide by $x$ at least once. We go one step stronger, and look at $lim_{ato 0^+}frac1a G(a)$. The $sin$ term gets us $3$. In the integral term, the integrand tends to $t^2cos(0) + 2t^2+2$ pointwise; by dominated convergence (using the same estimates as before), $lim_{ato 0^+}frac1a G(a) = 3 - 3 = 0$. That... well, that tells us $H$ is a multiple of the standard Bessel function $J_1$. We need to go another degree higher to find what multiple.
    For that, the expression we're working with isn't terribly convenient, so we go back to a much earlier one:
    begin{align*}G(a) &= int_0^a left(1+frac{a^2}{x^2}right)sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    frac1{a^2}G(a) &= int_0^1 left(frac1{a^2}+frac1{a^2t^2}right)sin(at)sinfrac{a}{t}cdot a,dt\
    frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_0^1 frac{t^2+1}{at^2}cdot atcdot sinfrac{a}{t},dt\
    frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_0^1 left(t+frac1tright)sinfrac{a}{t},dtend{align*}

    As $ato 0^+$, that last form of the integrand tends to zero. The $tsinfrac{a}{t}$ term tends to zero uniformly, while the other term is large enough to matter at zero. Now, we substitute:
    begin{align*}frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_0^1 frac1tsinfrac{a}{t},dt\
    &,^{t=tfrac{a}{x}}_{dt=-tfrac{a}{x^2},dx}\
    frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_{infty}^{a} -frac{x}{a}sin(x)cdotfrac{a}{x^2},dx\
    frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_a^{infty} frac{sin x}{x},dx = frac{pi}{2}end{align*}

    That's our limit - $lim_{ato 0^+} frac1{a^2}G(a)=frac{pi}{2}$. For normalization, note that $J_1(t)approx frac{t}{2}$ for $t$ near zero. Then $H(2a)approx frac1{2a}G(a) approx frac{pi}{4}a$, and thus $H(2a)=frac{pi}{4}J_1(2a)$. Converting back to $G$, $G(a) = 2a H(2a) = frac{pi a}{2}J_1(2a)$.
    The original question asked was $G(1)$, for an integral of $frac{pi}{2} J_1(2)$. The answer is confirmed... and it only took me most of a day to get there.




    Doing it a second time? It took longer to find the old post than to reedit it for this site's formatting.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    I'm pretty sure I remember doing this one before...



    Ah, there it is. AoPS link.



    Quoting myself:




    Well, you can't just leave it there. This one definitely deserves more than just an answer.



    Now, trying to work out an actual solution - $1$ is not a special point for $sin$. There's nothing special about picking $frac1x$ there - so, to give ourselves more handles to work with, we stretch the problem. Define
    $$F(a) = int_0^{infty}sin(x)sinleft(frac{a}{x}right),dx$$
    Now, we would like to differentiate $F$. Differentiating under the integral sign gets us $F'(a) stackrel{?}{=} int_0^{infty}frac1xsin(x)cosleft(frac{a}{x}right),dx$ and then $F''(a) stackrel{?}{=} int_0^{infty}frac{-1}{x^2}sin(x)sinleft(frac{a}{x}right),dx$, while substituting $t=frac{a}x$ gets us $F(a) = int_{infty}^{0}sinleft(frac{a}{t}right)sin(t)cdotfrac{-a}{t^2},dt stackrel{?}{=} -aF''(a)$.



    Why the question marks? Because I'm doing things with conditionally convergent integrals that I would need absolute convergence to justify.

    It's still informative. That's not the Bessel differential equation, but it's related - looking at the power series, we would get a Bessel function of $2sqrt{a}$. In light of that, let's redefine:
    $$G(a) = int_0^{infty}sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx$$
    Now, we need to massage this into a form that will let us justify the differentiation. First, split at $x=a$ and fold with that substitution:
    begin{align*}G(a) &= int_0^a sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx + int_a^{infty} sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    &= int_0^a sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx + int_a^0 sinleft(frac{a^2}{t}right)sin(t)cdotfrac{-a^2}{t^2},dt\
    &= int_0^a sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx + int_0^a frac{a^2}{x^2}sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    G(a) &= int_0^a left(1+frac{a^2}{x^2}right)sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dxend{align*}

    This form is improper at zero due to the rapid growth (balanced by oscillation), so we integrate by parts:
    begin{align*}G(a) &= int_0^a left(1+frac{a^2}{x^2}right)sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    &,_{dv = tfrac{a^2}{x^2}sintfrac{a^2}{x},dx,quad v = costfrac{a^2}{x}}^{u = (tfrac{x^2}{a^2}+1)sin x,quad du = (tfrac{x^2}{a^2}+1)cos x + tfrac{2x}{a^2}sin x,dx}\
    G(a) &= left[left(frac{x^2}{a^2}+1right)sin xcosfrac{a^2}{x}right]_{x=0}^{x=a} - int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}left(left(frac{x^2}{a^2}+1right)cos x + frac{2x}{a^2}sin xright),dx\
    &= sin(2a) - int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}left(left(frac{x^2}{a^2}+1right)cos x + frac{2x}{a^2}sin xright),dxend{align*}

    This form is now absolutely convergent; it's the integral of a bounded function on a bounded interval, continuous except at one endpoint. If we differentiate it - well, then we get terms in which we multiply by $frac{2a}{x}$, and it's improper again. Only the $cosfrac{a^2}{x}cos x$ term causes trouble, so let's separate that out:
    $$G(a) = sin(2a) - int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}left(frac{x^2}{a^2}cos x + frac{2x}{a^2}sin xright),dx - int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}cos x,dx$$
    begin{align*}int_0^a cosfrac{a^2}{x}cos x,dx &= left[-frac{x^2}{a^2}cos xsinfrac{a^2}{x}right]_{x=0}^{x=a} + int_0^a sinfrac{a^2}{x}left(frac{2x}{a^2}cos x - frac{x^2}{a^2}sin(x)right),dx\
    G(a) &= frac32sin(2a) -int_0^a frac{x^2}{a^2}cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + frac{2x}{a^2}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dxend{align*}

    That's a lot of trig identities that go into that last line - mostly the angle-sum identities, which our manipulation was nice enough to set up for us cleanly.



    And now, we can finally differentiate cleanly.
    begin{align*}G(a) &= frac32sin(2a) -int_0^a frac{x^2}{a^2}cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + frac{2x}{a^2}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    G'(a) &= 3cos(2a) - cos(2a) - frac{2}{a}sin(2a)\
    &quad+int_0^a frac{2x^2}{a^3}cosleft(*right) + frac{2x}{a}sinleft(*right) + frac{4x}{a^3}sinleft(*right) - frac{4}{a}cosleft(*right),dx\
    G'(a) &= 2cos(2a) -frac{2}{a}sin(2a)\
    &quad + int_0^a left(frac{2x^2}{a^3}-frac{4}{a}right)cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + left(frac{2x}{a} + frac{4x}{a^3}right)sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dxend{align*}

    And now... we'd like to differentiate again, but one of the terms doesn't have any powers of $x$ to cushion it, and differentiating it will break absolute convergence. Separate it out and integrate by parts again:
    begin{align*}int_0^a frac{x^2}{a^3}left(1-frac{a^2}{x^2}right)cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx &= left[frac{x^2}{a^3}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right)right]_{x=0}^{x=a} - int_0^a frac{2x}{a^3}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    &= frac{1}{a}sin(2a) - int_0^a frac{2x}{a^3}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dxend{align*}

    Multiply by $4$ and add/subtract, to clear the $frac{4}{a}cos(*)$ term:
    begin{align*} G'(a) &= 2cos(2a) + frac{2}{a}sin(2a) + int_0^a -frac{2x^2}{a^3}cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + left(frac{2x}{a} - frac{4x}{a^3}right)sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    G'(a) &= 2cos(2a) - frac1asin(2a) + frac2a G(a) + int_0^a frac{2x}{a}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    G''(a) &= -4sin(2a) - frac2acos(2a) + frac1{a^2}sin(2a) -frac2{a^2} G(a) + frac2a G'(a) + 2sin(2a)\
    &quad + int_0^a 4cos(*) - frac{2x}{a^2}sin(*),dx\
    G''(a) &= -2sin(2a) + frac1{a^2}sin(2a) - frac2acos(2a) -frac2{a^2} G(a) + frac2a G'(a)\
    &quad + int_0^a 4cos(*) - frac{2x}{a^2}sin(*),dxend{align*}

    Now, we deal with those integrals. From an integration by parts earlier, $int_0^a (x^2-a^2)cos(*) + 2xsin(*),dx = a^2sin(2a)$. From our expression for $G$, $int_0^a x^2cos(*) + 2xsin(*) = frac{3a^2}{2}sin(2a)-a^2 G(a)$. Subtract the two, divide by $a^2$, and $int_0^a cos(*),dx = frac12sin(2a) - G(a)$. Similarly, from our latest expression for $G'$, $int_0^a xsin(*),dx = frac{a}{2}G'(a) - G(a) - acos(2a) + frac12sin(2a)$. Apply these to the formula for $G''$, and
    begin{align*}G''(a) &= -2sin(2a) + frac1{a^2}sin(2a) - frac2acos(2a) - frac2{a^2}G(a) + frac2{a}G'(a) +\
    &quad 2sin(2a) - 4 G(a) - frac1a G'(a) + frac2{a^2}G(a) + frac2acos(2a) - frac1{a^2}sin(2a)\
    G''(a) &= frac1{a}G'(a) - 4 G(a) end{align*}

    This almost looks like a stretched Bessel equation of order zero - but the middle term has the wrong sign, and that's not something we can change by just flipping the sign of $x$ or something.
    No, the way to change that middle term is to multiply the function by powers of $x$. Combining with that stretch, let $H(t)=frac1t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right)$. Then $H'(t)=frac{1}{2t}G'left(frac{t}{2}right)-frac1{t^2}Gleft(frac{t}{2}right)$, $H''(t)=frac{1}{4t}G''left(frac{t}{2}right)-frac1{t^2}G'left(frac{t}{2}right)+frac{2}{t^3}Gleft(frac{t}{2}right)$, and
    begin{align*}t^2 H''(t) + t H(t) + (t^2-1)H(t) &= frac{t}{4}G''left(frac{t}{2}right)-G'left(frac{t}{2}right)+frac2t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right) + frac12G'left(frac{t}{2}right)\
    &quad - frac1t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right) + t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right) - frac1t Gleft(frac{t}{2}right)\
    &= frac{t}{4}G''left(frac{t}{2}right) - frac12 G'left(frac{t}{2}right) + tGleft(frac{t}{2}right)\
    &stackrel{s=t/2}{=} frac{s}{2}left(G''(s) -frac1s G'(s) + 4 G(s)right) = 0end{align*}
    That equation for $H(t)$ is the Bessel equation of order $1$.



    Now, we still need an initial condition. What is $G(0)$? Well, our equation degenerates there in several ways, but we can take a limit:
    begin{align*}lim_{ato 0^+}G(a) &= lim_{ato 0^+}frac32sin(2a) -lim_{ato 0^+}int_0^a frac{x^2}{a^2}cosleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right) + frac{2x}{a^2}sinleft(x+frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    &= 0 - lim_{ato 0^+}int_0^1 left(t^2cosleft(at+frac{a}{t}right) + frac{2t}{a}sinleft(at+frac{a}{t}right)right)cdot a,dt = 0end{align*}

    The first part of that integral is bounded by $at^2$, which tends to zero uniformly. For the second part, we use $|sin(x)|le |x|$; it's bounded by $2at^2 + 2a$, which also goes to zero uniformly.
    But that's not enough - we're going to divide by $x$ at least once. We go one step stronger, and look at $lim_{ato 0^+}frac1a G(a)$. The $sin$ term gets us $3$. In the integral term, the integrand tends to $t^2cos(0) + 2t^2+2$ pointwise; by dominated convergence (using the same estimates as before), $lim_{ato 0^+}frac1a G(a) = 3 - 3 = 0$. That... well, that tells us $H$ is a multiple of the standard Bessel function $J_1$. We need to go another degree higher to find what multiple.
    For that, the expression we're working with isn't terribly convenient, so we go back to a much earlier one:
    begin{align*}G(a) &= int_0^a left(1+frac{a^2}{x^2}right)sin(x)sinleft(frac{a^2}{x}right),dx\
    frac1{a^2}G(a) &= int_0^1 left(frac1{a^2}+frac1{a^2t^2}right)sin(at)sinfrac{a}{t}cdot a,dt\
    frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_0^1 frac{t^2+1}{at^2}cdot atcdot sinfrac{a}{t},dt\
    frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_0^1 left(t+frac1tright)sinfrac{a}{t},dtend{align*}

    As $ato 0^+$, that last form of the integrand tends to zero. The $tsinfrac{a}{t}$ term tends to zero uniformly, while the other term is large enough to matter at zero. Now, we substitute:
    begin{align*}frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_0^1 frac1tsinfrac{a}{t},dt\
    &,^{t=tfrac{a}{x}}_{dt=-tfrac{a}{x^2},dx}\
    frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_{infty}^{a} -frac{x}{a}sin(x)cdotfrac{a}{x^2},dx\
    frac1{a^2}G(a) &approx int_a^{infty} frac{sin x}{x},dx = frac{pi}{2}end{align*}

    That's our limit - $lim_{ato 0^+} frac1{a^2}G(a)=frac{pi}{2}$. For normalization, note that $J_1(t)approx frac{t}{2}$ for $t$ near zero. Then $H(2a)approx frac1{2a}G(a) approx frac{pi}{4}a$, and thus $H(2a)=frac{pi}{4}J_1(2a)$. Converting back to $G$, $G(a) = 2a H(2a) = frac{pi a}{2}J_1(2a)$.
    The original question asked was $G(1)$, for an integral of $frac{pi}{2} J_1(2)$. The answer is confirmed... and it only took me most of a day to get there.




    Doing it a second time? It took longer to find the old post than to reedit it for this site's formatting.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Jan 10 at 5:45

























    answered Jan 10 at 4:34









    jmerryjmerry

    5,912718




    5,912718












    • $begingroup$
      Wow, what a process!
      $endgroup$
      – aleden
      Jan 10 at 4:42










    • $begingroup$
      It certainly was. There's a reason the thread I linked had a gap of more than two days between the previous post and the argument I reproduced here. It's softened a bit by the roadmap from the beginning - by differentiating under the integral sign, we can see what the answers should be. Then from there, we need to find equivalent forms with better convergence behavior so as to justify that technique; the calculations to make that work are the bulk of it.
      $endgroup$
      – jmerry
      Jan 10 at 4:59


















    • $begingroup$
      Wow, what a process!
      $endgroup$
      – aleden
      Jan 10 at 4:42










    • $begingroup$
      It certainly was. There's a reason the thread I linked had a gap of more than two days between the previous post and the argument I reproduced here. It's softened a bit by the roadmap from the beginning - by differentiating under the integral sign, we can see what the answers should be. Then from there, we need to find equivalent forms with better convergence behavior so as to justify that technique; the calculations to make that work are the bulk of it.
      $endgroup$
      – jmerry
      Jan 10 at 4:59
















    $begingroup$
    Wow, what a process!
    $endgroup$
    – aleden
    Jan 10 at 4:42




    $begingroup$
    Wow, what a process!
    $endgroup$
    – aleden
    Jan 10 at 4:42












    $begingroup$
    It certainly was. There's a reason the thread I linked had a gap of more than two days between the previous post and the argument I reproduced here. It's softened a bit by the roadmap from the beginning - by differentiating under the integral sign, we can see what the answers should be. Then from there, we need to find equivalent forms with better convergence behavior so as to justify that technique; the calculations to make that work are the bulk of it.
    $endgroup$
    – jmerry
    Jan 10 at 4:59




    $begingroup$
    It certainly was. There's a reason the thread I linked had a gap of more than two days between the previous post and the argument I reproduced here. It's softened a bit by the roadmap from the beginning - by differentiating under the integral sign, we can see what the answers should be. Then from there, we need to find equivalent forms with better convergence behavior so as to justify that technique; the calculations to make that work are the bulk of it.
    $endgroup$
    – jmerry
    Jan 10 at 4:59











    6












    $begingroup$

    Maple gets the answer
    $$ frac{pi}{2} J_1(2) $$
    where $J_1$ is the Bessel function of first order. It says it used the "meijerg" method.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      So it could probably be expressed in terms of the Meijer G Function and then simplified to this Bessel Function?
      $endgroup$
      – aleden
      Jan 10 at 4:07










    • $begingroup$
      This agrees with the numerical value obtained by Wolfram.
      $endgroup$
      – Cheerful Parsnip
      Jan 10 at 4:11
















    6












    $begingroup$

    Maple gets the answer
    $$ frac{pi}{2} J_1(2) $$
    where $J_1$ is the Bessel function of first order. It says it used the "meijerg" method.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      So it could probably be expressed in terms of the Meijer G Function and then simplified to this Bessel Function?
      $endgroup$
      – aleden
      Jan 10 at 4:07










    • $begingroup$
      This agrees with the numerical value obtained by Wolfram.
      $endgroup$
      – Cheerful Parsnip
      Jan 10 at 4:11














    6












    6








    6





    $begingroup$

    Maple gets the answer
    $$ frac{pi}{2} J_1(2) $$
    where $J_1$ is the Bessel function of first order. It says it used the "meijerg" method.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Maple gets the answer
    $$ frac{pi}{2} J_1(2) $$
    where $J_1$ is the Bessel function of first order. It says it used the "meijerg" method.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Jan 10 at 4:02









    Robert IsraelRobert Israel

    321k23210463




    321k23210463












    • $begingroup$
      So it could probably be expressed in terms of the Meijer G Function and then simplified to this Bessel Function?
      $endgroup$
      – aleden
      Jan 10 at 4:07










    • $begingroup$
      This agrees with the numerical value obtained by Wolfram.
      $endgroup$
      – Cheerful Parsnip
      Jan 10 at 4:11


















    • $begingroup$
      So it could probably be expressed in terms of the Meijer G Function and then simplified to this Bessel Function?
      $endgroup$
      – aleden
      Jan 10 at 4:07










    • $begingroup$
      This agrees with the numerical value obtained by Wolfram.
      $endgroup$
      – Cheerful Parsnip
      Jan 10 at 4:11
















    $begingroup$
    So it could probably be expressed in terms of the Meijer G Function and then simplified to this Bessel Function?
    $endgroup$
    – aleden
    Jan 10 at 4:07




    $begingroup$
    So it could probably be expressed in terms of the Meijer G Function and then simplified to this Bessel Function?
    $endgroup$
    – aleden
    Jan 10 at 4:07












    $begingroup$
    This agrees with the numerical value obtained by Wolfram.
    $endgroup$
    – Cheerful Parsnip
    Jan 10 at 4:11




    $begingroup$
    This agrees with the numerical value obtained by Wolfram.
    $endgroup$
    – Cheerful Parsnip
    Jan 10 at 4:11











    3












    $begingroup$

    Consider



    $$F(a,b) = int_0^{infty}sin(ax)sinleft(frac{b}{x}right),dx$$



    Now, the Laplace transform of $F$ as a function of $b$,



    $$mathcal{L}(F)=int_0^{infty}frac{xsin(ax)}{1+s^2x^2}=frac{pi}{2}frac{e^{-frac{a}{s}}}{s^2}$$



    The last integral is computed in this site many times.



    Finally, to invert the Laplace transform to recover $F(a,b)$ we use the inspection method.



    That means that we'll look at the table Laplace transform pairs.



    In this case we have good luck,



    $$F(a,b) =frac{pi}{2}sqrtfrac{b}{a}J_1(2sqrt{ab})$$



    where $J_1(x)$ is the Bessel Function of the First Kind






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      3












      $begingroup$

      Consider



      $$F(a,b) = int_0^{infty}sin(ax)sinleft(frac{b}{x}right),dx$$



      Now, the Laplace transform of $F$ as a function of $b$,



      $$mathcal{L}(F)=int_0^{infty}frac{xsin(ax)}{1+s^2x^2}=frac{pi}{2}frac{e^{-frac{a}{s}}}{s^2}$$



      The last integral is computed in this site many times.



      Finally, to invert the Laplace transform to recover $F(a,b)$ we use the inspection method.



      That means that we'll look at the table Laplace transform pairs.



      In this case we have good luck,



      $$F(a,b) =frac{pi}{2}sqrtfrac{b}{a}J_1(2sqrt{ab})$$



      where $J_1(x)$ is the Bessel Function of the First Kind






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        Consider



        $$F(a,b) = int_0^{infty}sin(ax)sinleft(frac{b}{x}right),dx$$



        Now, the Laplace transform of $F$ as a function of $b$,



        $$mathcal{L}(F)=int_0^{infty}frac{xsin(ax)}{1+s^2x^2}=frac{pi}{2}frac{e^{-frac{a}{s}}}{s^2}$$



        The last integral is computed in this site many times.



        Finally, to invert the Laplace transform to recover $F(a,b)$ we use the inspection method.



        That means that we'll look at the table Laplace transform pairs.



        In this case we have good luck,



        $$F(a,b) =frac{pi}{2}sqrtfrac{b}{a}J_1(2sqrt{ab})$$



        where $J_1(x)$ is the Bessel Function of the First Kind






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Consider



        $$F(a,b) = int_0^{infty}sin(ax)sinleft(frac{b}{x}right),dx$$



        Now, the Laplace transform of $F$ as a function of $b$,



        $$mathcal{L}(F)=int_0^{infty}frac{xsin(ax)}{1+s^2x^2}=frac{pi}{2}frac{e^{-frac{a}{s}}}{s^2}$$



        The last integral is computed in this site many times.



        Finally, to invert the Laplace transform to recover $F(a,b)$ we use the inspection method.



        That means that we'll look at the table Laplace transform pairs.



        In this case we have good luck,



        $$F(a,b) =frac{pi}{2}sqrtfrac{b}{a}J_1(2sqrt{ab})$$



        where $J_1(x)$ is the Bessel Function of the First Kind







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 12 at 22:24









        Martin GalesMartin Gales

        3,53911935




        3,53911935






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068201%2fclosed-form-of-int-0-infty-sinx-sin-left-frac1x-rightdx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Mario Kart Wii

            The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

            What does “Dominus providebit” mean?