“nothing” in boolean algebra












-1












$begingroup$


Is there formal notation for saying "there is no x for which P(x)" or is it simply something like $( neg exists x) P(x)$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    There's nothing informal about using words. Words are great.
    $endgroup$
    – Misha Lavrov
    Jan 8 at 20:48










  • $begingroup$
    @MishaLavrov Sorry, I meant formal notation. I will revise my wording.
    $endgroup$
    – NetherGranite
    Jan 8 at 20:50








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I would use parentheses a little differently but you have the basic idea: $lnot (exists x P(x))$
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    Jan 8 at 20:52






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    $not exists x mid P(x)$
    $endgroup$
    – Kuifje
    Jan 8 at 20:55










  • $begingroup$
    In boolean algebra, wouldn't this just be "For all $x$, $P(x)=0$"? (I mean if it were a logic circuit, you'd just take the $P(x)$ signal directly from the OV supply raill . . .)
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    Jan 8 at 22:02


















-1












$begingroup$


Is there formal notation for saying "there is no x for which P(x)" or is it simply something like $( neg exists x) P(x)$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    There's nothing informal about using words. Words are great.
    $endgroup$
    – Misha Lavrov
    Jan 8 at 20:48










  • $begingroup$
    @MishaLavrov Sorry, I meant formal notation. I will revise my wording.
    $endgroup$
    – NetherGranite
    Jan 8 at 20:50








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I would use parentheses a little differently but you have the basic idea: $lnot (exists x P(x))$
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    Jan 8 at 20:52






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    $not exists x mid P(x)$
    $endgroup$
    – Kuifje
    Jan 8 at 20:55










  • $begingroup$
    In boolean algebra, wouldn't this just be "For all $x$, $P(x)=0$"? (I mean if it were a logic circuit, you'd just take the $P(x)$ signal directly from the OV supply raill . . .)
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    Jan 8 at 22:02
















-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$


Is there formal notation for saying "there is no x for which P(x)" or is it simply something like $( neg exists x) P(x)$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Is there formal notation for saying "there is no x for which P(x)" or is it simply something like $( neg exists x) P(x)$?







notation boolean-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 8 at 20:51







NetherGranite

















asked Jan 8 at 20:45









NetherGraniteNetherGranite

1417




1417








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    There's nothing informal about using words. Words are great.
    $endgroup$
    – Misha Lavrov
    Jan 8 at 20:48










  • $begingroup$
    @MishaLavrov Sorry, I meant formal notation. I will revise my wording.
    $endgroup$
    – NetherGranite
    Jan 8 at 20:50








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I would use parentheses a little differently but you have the basic idea: $lnot (exists x P(x))$
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    Jan 8 at 20:52






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    $not exists x mid P(x)$
    $endgroup$
    – Kuifje
    Jan 8 at 20:55










  • $begingroup$
    In boolean algebra, wouldn't this just be "For all $x$, $P(x)=0$"? (I mean if it were a logic circuit, you'd just take the $P(x)$ signal directly from the OV supply raill . . .)
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    Jan 8 at 22:02
















  • 4




    $begingroup$
    There's nothing informal about using words. Words are great.
    $endgroup$
    – Misha Lavrov
    Jan 8 at 20:48










  • $begingroup$
    @MishaLavrov Sorry, I meant formal notation. I will revise my wording.
    $endgroup$
    – NetherGranite
    Jan 8 at 20:50








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I would use parentheses a little differently but you have the basic idea: $lnot (exists x P(x))$
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    Jan 8 at 20:52






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    $not exists x mid P(x)$
    $endgroup$
    – Kuifje
    Jan 8 at 20:55










  • $begingroup$
    In boolean algebra, wouldn't this just be "For all $x$, $P(x)=0$"? (I mean if it were a logic circuit, you'd just take the $P(x)$ signal directly from the OV supply raill . . .)
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    Jan 8 at 22:02










4




4




$begingroup$
There's nothing informal about using words. Words are great.
$endgroup$
– Misha Lavrov
Jan 8 at 20:48




$begingroup$
There's nothing informal about using words. Words are great.
$endgroup$
– Misha Lavrov
Jan 8 at 20:48












$begingroup$
@MishaLavrov Sorry, I meant formal notation. I will revise my wording.
$endgroup$
– NetherGranite
Jan 8 at 20:50






$begingroup$
@MishaLavrov Sorry, I meant formal notation. I will revise my wording.
$endgroup$
– NetherGranite
Jan 8 at 20:50






3




3




$begingroup$
I would use parentheses a little differently but you have the basic idea: $lnot (exists x P(x))$
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Jan 8 at 20:52




$begingroup$
I would use parentheses a little differently but you have the basic idea: $lnot (exists x P(x))$
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Jan 8 at 20:52




3




3




$begingroup$
$not exists x mid P(x)$
$endgroup$
– Kuifje
Jan 8 at 20:55




$begingroup$
$not exists x mid P(x)$
$endgroup$
– Kuifje
Jan 8 at 20:55












$begingroup$
In boolean algebra, wouldn't this just be "For all $x$, $P(x)=0$"? (I mean if it were a logic circuit, you'd just take the $P(x)$ signal directly from the OV supply raill . . .)
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Jan 8 at 22:02






$begingroup$
In boolean algebra, wouldn't this just be "For all $x$, $P(x)=0$"? (I mean if it were a logic circuit, you'd just take the $P(x)$ signal directly from the OV supply raill . . .)
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Jan 8 at 22:02












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

There's no established symbol analogous to $forall$ or $exists$, no. You can write either $neg exists x. P(x)$ or $forall x. neg P(x)$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066689%2fnothing-in-boolean-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    There's no established symbol analogous to $forall$ or $exists$, no. You can write either $neg exists x. P(x)$ or $forall x. neg P(x)$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      3












      $begingroup$

      There's no established symbol analogous to $forall$ or $exists$, no. You can write either $neg exists x. P(x)$ or $forall x. neg P(x)$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        There's no established symbol analogous to $forall$ or $exists$, no. You can write either $neg exists x. P(x)$ or $forall x. neg P(x)$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        There's no established symbol analogous to $forall$ or $exists$, no. You can write either $neg exists x. P(x)$ or $forall x. neg P(x)$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 8 at 20:51









        Daniel McLauryDaniel McLaury

        15.6k32977




        15.6k32977






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066689%2fnothing-in-boolean-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Mario Kart Wii

            The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

            What does “Dominus providebit” mean?