Does sequence converge in probability?












0












$begingroup$


Let $X_1, X_2, X_3,...$ be a sequence of nonnegative random variables such that $limlimits_{ntoinfty} E[X_n]=0$.



I want to know if the sequence $Y_n=1-e^{-X_n}$ converges in probability and if so, what is the limit.



My thought is to approach this problem using the Markov inequality:



$$P[X>epsilon]leqfrac{E[X]}{epsilon}$$



Then, by plugging in $Y_n$, I get,



$$P[Y_n>epsilon]leqfrac{E[1-e^{-X_n}]}{epsilon}$$



and since $limlimits_{ntoinfty} E[X_n]=0$, then $E[1-e^{-X_n}]$ must also go to $0$ as $ntoinfty$. Therefore, $Y_n$ converges in probability to $0$.



Is this a correct proof?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What is the meaning of $X_n$?
    $endgroup$
    – callculus
    Jan 8 at 19:48










  • $begingroup$
    Of course, you might be asked to include a proof of the step that $E(X_n)to0$ implies $E(1-e^{-X_n})to0$. Can you do that?
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Jan 8 at 20:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @callculus There is no specific meaning other than what is stated. X_i are a sequence of rvs and the limit of that sequence has a mean of zer0.
    $endgroup$
    – Avedis
    Jan 8 at 21:02






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @callculus It doesnt mean what you implied. It could, but the problem is specifically not commenting. You are given the facts that you have a sequence, the rv's are non-negative, and the expectation of the limit is 0.
    $endgroup$
    – Avedis
    Jan 8 at 21:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You are again asserting that $E(X_n)to0$ implies $E(e^{-X_n})to1$, not proving it. Can you prove this?
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Jan 8 at 21:31
















0












$begingroup$


Let $X_1, X_2, X_3,...$ be a sequence of nonnegative random variables such that $limlimits_{ntoinfty} E[X_n]=0$.



I want to know if the sequence $Y_n=1-e^{-X_n}$ converges in probability and if so, what is the limit.



My thought is to approach this problem using the Markov inequality:



$$P[X>epsilon]leqfrac{E[X]}{epsilon}$$



Then, by plugging in $Y_n$, I get,



$$P[Y_n>epsilon]leqfrac{E[1-e^{-X_n}]}{epsilon}$$



and since $limlimits_{ntoinfty} E[X_n]=0$, then $E[1-e^{-X_n}]$ must also go to $0$ as $ntoinfty$. Therefore, $Y_n$ converges in probability to $0$.



Is this a correct proof?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What is the meaning of $X_n$?
    $endgroup$
    – callculus
    Jan 8 at 19:48










  • $begingroup$
    Of course, you might be asked to include a proof of the step that $E(X_n)to0$ implies $E(1-e^{-X_n})to0$. Can you do that?
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Jan 8 at 20:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @callculus There is no specific meaning other than what is stated. X_i are a sequence of rvs and the limit of that sequence has a mean of zer0.
    $endgroup$
    – Avedis
    Jan 8 at 21:02






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @callculus It doesnt mean what you implied. It could, but the problem is specifically not commenting. You are given the facts that you have a sequence, the rv's are non-negative, and the expectation of the limit is 0.
    $endgroup$
    – Avedis
    Jan 8 at 21:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You are again asserting that $E(X_n)to0$ implies $E(e^{-X_n})to1$, not proving it. Can you prove this?
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Jan 8 at 21:31














0












0








0


0



$begingroup$


Let $X_1, X_2, X_3,...$ be a sequence of nonnegative random variables such that $limlimits_{ntoinfty} E[X_n]=0$.



I want to know if the sequence $Y_n=1-e^{-X_n}$ converges in probability and if so, what is the limit.



My thought is to approach this problem using the Markov inequality:



$$P[X>epsilon]leqfrac{E[X]}{epsilon}$$



Then, by plugging in $Y_n$, I get,



$$P[Y_n>epsilon]leqfrac{E[1-e^{-X_n}]}{epsilon}$$



and since $limlimits_{ntoinfty} E[X_n]=0$, then $E[1-e^{-X_n}]$ must also go to $0$ as $ntoinfty$. Therefore, $Y_n$ converges in probability to $0$.



Is this a correct proof?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $X_1, X_2, X_3,...$ be a sequence of nonnegative random variables such that $limlimits_{ntoinfty} E[X_n]=0$.



I want to know if the sequence $Y_n=1-e^{-X_n}$ converges in probability and if so, what is the limit.



My thought is to approach this problem using the Markov inequality:



$$P[X>epsilon]leqfrac{E[X]}{epsilon}$$



Then, by plugging in $Y_n$, I get,



$$P[Y_n>epsilon]leqfrac{E[1-e^{-X_n}]}{epsilon}$$



and since $limlimits_{ntoinfty} E[X_n]=0$, then $E[1-e^{-X_n}]$ must also go to $0$ as $ntoinfty$. Therefore, $Y_n$ converges in probability to $0$.



Is this a correct proof?







probability sequences-and-series convergence






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 8 at 21:54









Shashi

7,1281528




7,1281528










asked Jan 8 at 19:44









AvedisAvedis

476




476












  • $begingroup$
    What is the meaning of $X_n$?
    $endgroup$
    – callculus
    Jan 8 at 19:48










  • $begingroup$
    Of course, you might be asked to include a proof of the step that $E(X_n)to0$ implies $E(1-e^{-X_n})to0$. Can you do that?
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Jan 8 at 20:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @callculus There is no specific meaning other than what is stated. X_i are a sequence of rvs and the limit of that sequence has a mean of zer0.
    $endgroup$
    – Avedis
    Jan 8 at 21:02






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @callculus It doesnt mean what you implied. It could, but the problem is specifically not commenting. You are given the facts that you have a sequence, the rv's are non-negative, and the expectation of the limit is 0.
    $endgroup$
    – Avedis
    Jan 8 at 21:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You are again asserting that $E(X_n)to0$ implies $E(e^{-X_n})to1$, not proving it. Can you prove this?
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Jan 8 at 21:31


















  • $begingroup$
    What is the meaning of $X_n$?
    $endgroup$
    – callculus
    Jan 8 at 19:48










  • $begingroup$
    Of course, you might be asked to include a proof of the step that $E(X_n)to0$ implies $E(1-e^{-X_n})to0$. Can you do that?
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Jan 8 at 20:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @callculus There is no specific meaning other than what is stated. X_i are a sequence of rvs and the limit of that sequence has a mean of zer0.
    $endgroup$
    – Avedis
    Jan 8 at 21:02






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @callculus It doesnt mean what you implied. It could, but the problem is specifically not commenting. You are given the facts that you have a sequence, the rv's are non-negative, and the expectation of the limit is 0.
    $endgroup$
    – Avedis
    Jan 8 at 21:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You are again asserting that $E(X_n)to0$ implies $E(e^{-X_n})to1$, not proving it. Can you prove this?
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Jan 8 at 21:31
















$begingroup$
What is the meaning of $X_n$?
$endgroup$
– callculus
Jan 8 at 19:48




$begingroup$
What is the meaning of $X_n$?
$endgroup$
– callculus
Jan 8 at 19:48












$begingroup$
Of course, you might be asked to include a proof of the step that $E(X_n)to0$ implies $E(1-e^{-X_n})to0$. Can you do that?
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 8 at 20:58




$begingroup$
Of course, you might be asked to include a proof of the step that $E(X_n)to0$ implies $E(1-e^{-X_n})to0$. Can you do that?
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 8 at 20:58




1




1




$begingroup$
@callculus There is no specific meaning other than what is stated. X_i are a sequence of rvs and the limit of that sequence has a mean of zer0.
$endgroup$
– Avedis
Jan 8 at 21:02




$begingroup$
@callculus There is no specific meaning other than what is stated. X_i are a sequence of rvs and the limit of that sequence has a mean of zer0.
$endgroup$
– Avedis
Jan 8 at 21:02




1




1




$begingroup$
@callculus It doesnt mean what you implied. It could, but the problem is specifically not commenting. You are given the facts that you have a sequence, the rv's are non-negative, and the expectation of the limit is 0.
$endgroup$
– Avedis
Jan 8 at 21:08




$begingroup$
@callculus It doesnt mean what you implied. It could, but the problem is specifically not commenting. You are given the facts that you have a sequence, the rv's are non-negative, and the expectation of the limit is 0.
$endgroup$
– Avedis
Jan 8 at 21:08




1




1




$begingroup$
You are again asserting that $E(X_n)to0$ implies $E(e^{-X_n})to1$, not proving it. Can you prove this?
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 8 at 21:31




$begingroup$
You are again asserting that $E(X_n)to0$ implies $E(e^{-X_n})to1$, not proving it. Can you prove this?
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 8 at 21:31










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

It is well known that
$$0leq 1-e^{-x}leq x$$
for all $xgeq 0$ (this fact can be easily proven using Mean Value Theorem for instance). In the particular problem you are considering the inequality translates to
$$0leq Y_n leq X_n$$
That gives the result
$$lim_{ntoinfty} mathbb E|Y_n|=0$$
Hence $Y_n$ converges to $0$ in $L^1$ so it converges in probability as well (by Markov's inequality). You indeed said the result; here is a way to prove it.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066632%2fdoes-sequence-converge-in-probability%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    It is well known that
    $$0leq 1-e^{-x}leq x$$
    for all $xgeq 0$ (this fact can be easily proven using Mean Value Theorem for instance). In the particular problem you are considering the inequality translates to
    $$0leq Y_n leq X_n$$
    That gives the result
    $$lim_{ntoinfty} mathbb E|Y_n|=0$$
    Hence $Y_n$ converges to $0$ in $L^1$ so it converges in probability as well (by Markov's inequality). You indeed said the result; here is a way to prove it.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      It is well known that
      $$0leq 1-e^{-x}leq x$$
      for all $xgeq 0$ (this fact can be easily proven using Mean Value Theorem for instance). In the particular problem you are considering the inequality translates to
      $$0leq Y_n leq X_n$$
      That gives the result
      $$lim_{ntoinfty} mathbb E|Y_n|=0$$
      Hence $Y_n$ converges to $0$ in $L^1$ so it converges in probability as well (by Markov's inequality). You indeed said the result; here is a way to prove it.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        It is well known that
        $$0leq 1-e^{-x}leq x$$
        for all $xgeq 0$ (this fact can be easily proven using Mean Value Theorem for instance). In the particular problem you are considering the inequality translates to
        $$0leq Y_n leq X_n$$
        That gives the result
        $$lim_{ntoinfty} mathbb E|Y_n|=0$$
        Hence $Y_n$ converges to $0$ in $L^1$ so it converges in probability as well (by Markov's inequality). You indeed said the result; here is a way to prove it.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        It is well known that
        $$0leq 1-e^{-x}leq x$$
        for all $xgeq 0$ (this fact can be easily proven using Mean Value Theorem for instance). In the particular problem you are considering the inequality translates to
        $$0leq Y_n leq X_n$$
        That gives the result
        $$lim_{ntoinfty} mathbb E|Y_n|=0$$
        Hence $Y_n$ converges to $0$ in $L^1$ so it converges in probability as well (by Markov's inequality). You indeed said the result; here is a way to prove it.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jan 8 at 21:56

























        answered Jan 8 at 21:50









        ShashiShashi

        7,1281528




        7,1281528






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066632%2fdoes-sequence-converge-in-probability%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Mario Kart Wii

            What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

            Antonio Litta Visconti Arese