Find the geodesic and normal curvatures of a surface












1















For the surface $sigma(u,v)= (frac{cos v}{cosh u}, frac{sin v}{cosh u}, tanh u)$, compute the geodesic curvature and the normal curvature of:



(i) a meridian $v$ = constant,



(ii) a parallel $u$ = constant.



Which of these curves are geodesics?




I know that a meridian is a geodesic and its geodesic curvature $kappa_g = 0$.



From the textbook, the normal curvature $kappa_n = gamma''·N$ and the geodesic curvature $kappa_g = gamma'' · (N times gamma')$, where $N$ is the unit normal of the surface, and $gamma$ is a unit-speed curve in $mathbb{R}^3$.



How can I find the $gamma$ in the formula? Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question



























    1















    For the surface $sigma(u,v)= (frac{cos v}{cosh u}, frac{sin v}{cosh u}, tanh u)$, compute the geodesic curvature and the normal curvature of:



    (i) a meridian $v$ = constant,



    (ii) a parallel $u$ = constant.



    Which of these curves are geodesics?




    I know that a meridian is a geodesic and its geodesic curvature $kappa_g = 0$.



    From the textbook, the normal curvature $kappa_n = gamma''·N$ and the geodesic curvature $kappa_g = gamma'' · (N times gamma')$, where $N$ is the unit normal of the surface, and $gamma$ is a unit-speed curve in $mathbb{R}^3$.



    How can I find the $gamma$ in the formula? Thanks!










    share|cite|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1


      0






      For the surface $sigma(u,v)= (frac{cos v}{cosh u}, frac{sin v}{cosh u}, tanh u)$, compute the geodesic curvature and the normal curvature of:



      (i) a meridian $v$ = constant,



      (ii) a parallel $u$ = constant.



      Which of these curves are geodesics?




      I know that a meridian is a geodesic and its geodesic curvature $kappa_g = 0$.



      From the textbook, the normal curvature $kappa_n = gamma''·N$ and the geodesic curvature $kappa_g = gamma'' · (N times gamma')$, where $N$ is the unit normal of the surface, and $gamma$ is a unit-speed curve in $mathbb{R}^3$.



      How can I find the $gamma$ in the formula? Thanks!










      share|cite|improve this question














      For the surface $sigma(u,v)= (frac{cos v}{cosh u}, frac{sin v}{cosh u}, tanh u)$, compute the geodesic curvature and the normal curvature of:



      (i) a meridian $v$ = constant,



      (ii) a parallel $u$ = constant.



      Which of these curves are geodesics?




      I know that a meridian is a geodesic and its geodesic curvature $kappa_g = 0$.



      From the textbook, the normal curvature $kappa_n = gamma''·N$ and the geodesic curvature $kappa_g = gamma'' · (N times gamma')$, where $N$ is the unit normal of the surface, and $gamma$ is a unit-speed curve in $mathbb{R}^3$.



      How can I find the $gamma$ in the formula? Thanks!







      differential-geometry curvature geodesic






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 2 '18 at 5:09









      Evelyn VenneEvelyn Venne

      607




      607






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          By keeping $u$ or $v$ constant in the parametrisation $sigma$ of the surface and keeping the other parameter "variable", you obtain the parametrisation of the coordinate lines.



          For instance, to parametrise a meridian, keeping $v$ constant gives
          $$
          gamma(t) = sigma(t, v_0) = left(frac{cos v_0}{cosh t}, frac{sin v_0}{cosh t}, tanh tright).
          $$



          In the same way, if you keep $u$ fixed and let the other parameter of $sigma$ be the variable of the curve, you get parametrisations of the parallels.






          share|cite|improve this answer































            0














            Normal and geodesic curvature of curves on a surface can be computed using the following formulae:
            begin{equation}
            k_n=frac{q}{s'^2} \
            k_g=frac{p}{s'^3}
            end{equation}

            where
            begin{equation}
            q=L_{11} u'^2+2 u' v' L_{12}+v'^2 L_{22} \
            p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3+(Gamma_{22}^2-2 Gamma_{12}^1) u' v'^2+(u' v''-u'' v')+(2 Gamma_{12}^2-Gamma_{11}^1)u'^2v'-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
            end{equation}

            where $Gamma_{jk}^i$ are the Christoffel symbols of the second kind, $L_{ij}$ the coefficient of the second fundamental form and g the first fundamental form. Independently of the case u=const or v=const, the product $u' v'$ are zero since or v is constant or u is constant. Thus, the above expressions reduce to:
            begin{equation}
            q=L_{11} u'^2+v'^2 L_{22} \
            p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
            end{equation}

            In addition $s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2+2 g_{12} u'v'+g_{22}v'^2}$ reduces to $s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2+g_{22}v'^2}$. We can now consider the two cases.




            1. v=const


            In such a case we have
            begin{equation}
            q=L_{11} u'^2 \
            p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}\
            s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2}
            end{equation}




            1. u =const


            In such a case we have
            begin{equation}
            q=v'^2 L_{22} \
            p=left[-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
            s'=sqrt{g_{22}v'^2}
            end{equation}

            When computing the non zero coefficient of the first fundamental form for $sigma$, we have $g_{11}=g_{22}=rm sech^2(u)$, while non zero coefficient of the second fundamental form are $L_{11}=L_{22}=-rm sech^2(u)$. When replacing these coefficient in the above expression we have
            1. v=const
            begin{equation}
            k_n=-1 \
            k_g=0
            end{equation}

            because $Gamma_{11}^2=0$. Since the geodesic curvature is zero, the curve is a geodesic.




            1. u=const
              begin{equation}
              k_n=-1 \
              k_g=-rm sech{(u_0)}
              end{equation}

              where $u_0$ is the constant.
              The definition of normal and geodesic curvature in your textbook can be written in term of p and q for practical computation.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2981352%2ffind-the-geodesic-and-normal-curvatures-of-a-surface%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              0














              By keeping $u$ or $v$ constant in the parametrisation $sigma$ of the surface and keeping the other parameter "variable", you obtain the parametrisation of the coordinate lines.



              For instance, to parametrise a meridian, keeping $v$ constant gives
              $$
              gamma(t) = sigma(t, v_0) = left(frac{cos v_0}{cosh t}, frac{sin v_0}{cosh t}, tanh tright).
              $$



              In the same way, if you keep $u$ fixed and let the other parameter of $sigma$ be the variable of the curve, you get parametrisations of the parallels.






              share|cite|improve this answer




























                0














                By keeping $u$ or $v$ constant in the parametrisation $sigma$ of the surface and keeping the other parameter "variable", you obtain the parametrisation of the coordinate lines.



                For instance, to parametrise a meridian, keeping $v$ constant gives
                $$
                gamma(t) = sigma(t, v_0) = left(frac{cos v_0}{cosh t}, frac{sin v_0}{cosh t}, tanh tright).
                $$



                In the same way, if you keep $u$ fixed and let the other parameter of $sigma$ be the variable of the curve, you get parametrisations of the parallels.






                share|cite|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0






                  By keeping $u$ or $v$ constant in the parametrisation $sigma$ of the surface and keeping the other parameter "variable", you obtain the parametrisation of the coordinate lines.



                  For instance, to parametrise a meridian, keeping $v$ constant gives
                  $$
                  gamma(t) = sigma(t, v_0) = left(frac{cos v_0}{cosh t}, frac{sin v_0}{cosh t}, tanh tright).
                  $$



                  In the same way, if you keep $u$ fixed and let the other parameter of $sigma$ be the variable of the curve, you get parametrisations of the parallels.






                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  By keeping $u$ or $v$ constant in the parametrisation $sigma$ of the surface and keeping the other parameter "variable", you obtain the parametrisation of the coordinate lines.



                  For instance, to parametrise a meridian, keeping $v$ constant gives
                  $$
                  gamma(t) = sigma(t, v_0) = left(frac{cos v_0}{cosh t}, frac{sin v_0}{cosh t}, tanh tright).
                  $$



                  In the same way, if you keep $u$ fixed and let the other parameter of $sigma$ be the variable of the curve, you get parametrisations of the parallels.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Nov 4 '18 at 1:14

























                  answered Nov 4 '18 at 0:36









                  Ernie060Ernie060

                  2,555319




                  2,555319























                      0














                      Normal and geodesic curvature of curves on a surface can be computed using the following formulae:
                      begin{equation}
                      k_n=frac{q}{s'^2} \
                      k_g=frac{p}{s'^3}
                      end{equation}

                      where
                      begin{equation}
                      q=L_{11} u'^2+2 u' v' L_{12}+v'^2 L_{22} \
                      p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3+(Gamma_{22}^2-2 Gamma_{12}^1) u' v'^2+(u' v''-u'' v')+(2 Gamma_{12}^2-Gamma_{11}^1)u'^2v'-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
                      end{equation}

                      where $Gamma_{jk}^i$ are the Christoffel symbols of the second kind, $L_{ij}$ the coefficient of the second fundamental form and g the first fundamental form. Independently of the case u=const or v=const, the product $u' v'$ are zero since or v is constant or u is constant. Thus, the above expressions reduce to:
                      begin{equation}
                      q=L_{11} u'^2+v'^2 L_{22} \
                      p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
                      end{equation}

                      In addition $s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2+2 g_{12} u'v'+g_{22}v'^2}$ reduces to $s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2+g_{22}v'^2}$. We can now consider the two cases.




                      1. v=const


                      In such a case we have
                      begin{equation}
                      q=L_{11} u'^2 \
                      p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}\
                      s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2}
                      end{equation}




                      1. u =const


                      In such a case we have
                      begin{equation}
                      q=v'^2 L_{22} \
                      p=left[-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
                      s'=sqrt{g_{22}v'^2}
                      end{equation}

                      When computing the non zero coefficient of the first fundamental form for $sigma$, we have $g_{11}=g_{22}=rm sech^2(u)$, while non zero coefficient of the second fundamental form are $L_{11}=L_{22}=-rm sech^2(u)$. When replacing these coefficient in the above expression we have
                      1. v=const
                      begin{equation}
                      k_n=-1 \
                      k_g=0
                      end{equation}

                      because $Gamma_{11}^2=0$. Since the geodesic curvature is zero, the curve is a geodesic.




                      1. u=const
                        begin{equation}
                        k_n=-1 \
                        k_g=-rm sech{(u_0)}
                        end{equation}

                        where $u_0$ is the constant.
                        The definition of normal and geodesic curvature in your textbook can be written in term of p and q for practical computation.






                      share|cite|improve this answer


























                        0














                        Normal and geodesic curvature of curves on a surface can be computed using the following formulae:
                        begin{equation}
                        k_n=frac{q}{s'^2} \
                        k_g=frac{p}{s'^3}
                        end{equation}

                        where
                        begin{equation}
                        q=L_{11} u'^2+2 u' v' L_{12}+v'^2 L_{22} \
                        p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3+(Gamma_{22}^2-2 Gamma_{12}^1) u' v'^2+(u' v''-u'' v')+(2 Gamma_{12}^2-Gamma_{11}^1)u'^2v'-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
                        end{equation}

                        where $Gamma_{jk}^i$ are the Christoffel symbols of the second kind, $L_{ij}$ the coefficient of the second fundamental form and g the first fundamental form. Independently of the case u=const or v=const, the product $u' v'$ are zero since or v is constant or u is constant. Thus, the above expressions reduce to:
                        begin{equation}
                        q=L_{11} u'^2+v'^2 L_{22} \
                        p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
                        end{equation}

                        In addition $s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2+2 g_{12} u'v'+g_{22}v'^2}$ reduces to $s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2+g_{22}v'^2}$. We can now consider the two cases.




                        1. v=const


                        In such a case we have
                        begin{equation}
                        q=L_{11} u'^2 \
                        p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}\
                        s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2}
                        end{equation}




                        1. u =const


                        In such a case we have
                        begin{equation}
                        q=v'^2 L_{22} \
                        p=left[-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
                        s'=sqrt{g_{22}v'^2}
                        end{equation}

                        When computing the non zero coefficient of the first fundamental form for $sigma$, we have $g_{11}=g_{22}=rm sech^2(u)$, while non zero coefficient of the second fundamental form are $L_{11}=L_{22}=-rm sech^2(u)$. When replacing these coefficient in the above expression we have
                        1. v=const
                        begin{equation}
                        k_n=-1 \
                        k_g=0
                        end{equation}

                        because $Gamma_{11}^2=0$. Since the geodesic curvature is zero, the curve is a geodesic.




                        1. u=const
                          begin{equation}
                          k_n=-1 \
                          k_g=-rm sech{(u_0)}
                          end{equation}

                          where $u_0$ is the constant.
                          The definition of normal and geodesic curvature in your textbook can be written in term of p and q for practical computation.






                        share|cite|improve this answer
























                          0












                          0








                          0






                          Normal and geodesic curvature of curves on a surface can be computed using the following formulae:
                          begin{equation}
                          k_n=frac{q}{s'^2} \
                          k_g=frac{p}{s'^3}
                          end{equation}

                          where
                          begin{equation}
                          q=L_{11} u'^2+2 u' v' L_{12}+v'^2 L_{22} \
                          p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3+(Gamma_{22}^2-2 Gamma_{12}^1) u' v'^2+(u' v''-u'' v')+(2 Gamma_{12}^2-Gamma_{11}^1)u'^2v'-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
                          end{equation}

                          where $Gamma_{jk}^i$ are the Christoffel symbols of the second kind, $L_{ij}$ the coefficient of the second fundamental form and g the first fundamental form. Independently of the case u=const or v=const, the product $u' v'$ are zero since or v is constant or u is constant. Thus, the above expressions reduce to:
                          begin{equation}
                          q=L_{11} u'^2+v'^2 L_{22} \
                          p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
                          end{equation}

                          In addition $s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2+2 g_{12} u'v'+g_{22}v'^2}$ reduces to $s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2+g_{22}v'^2}$. We can now consider the two cases.




                          1. v=const


                          In such a case we have
                          begin{equation}
                          q=L_{11} u'^2 \
                          p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}\
                          s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2}
                          end{equation}




                          1. u =const


                          In such a case we have
                          begin{equation}
                          q=v'^2 L_{22} \
                          p=left[-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
                          s'=sqrt{g_{22}v'^2}
                          end{equation}

                          When computing the non zero coefficient of the first fundamental form for $sigma$, we have $g_{11}=g_{22}=rm sech^2(u)$, while non zero coefficient of the second fundamental form are $L_{11}=L_{22}=-rm sech^2(u)$. When replacing these coefficient in the above expression we have
                          1. v=const
                          begin{equation}
                          k_n=-1 \
                          k_g=0
                          end{equation}

                          because $Gamma_{11}^2=0$. Since the geodesic curvature is zero, the curve is a geodesic.




                          1. u=const
                            begin{equation}
                            k_n=-1 \
                            k_g=-rm sech{(u_0)}
                            end{equation}

                            where $u_0$ is the constant.
                            The definition of normal and geodesic curvature in your textbook can be written in term of p and q for practical computation.






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          Normal and geodesic curvature of curves on a surface can be computed using the following formulae:
                          begin{equation}
                          k_n=frac{q}{s'^2} \
                          k_g=frac{p}{s'^3}
                          end{equation}

                          where
                          begin{equation}
                          q=L_{11} u'^2+2 u' v' L_{12}+v'^2 L_{22} \
                          p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3+(Gamma_{22}^2-2 Gamma_{12}^1) u' v'^2+(u' v''-u'' v')+(2 Gamma_{12}^2-Gamma_{11}^1)u'^2v'-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
                          end{equation}

                          where $Gamma_{jk}^i$ are the Christoffel symbols of the second kind, $L_{ij}$ the coefficient of the second fundamental form and g the first fundamental form. Independently of the case u=const or v=const, the product $u' v'$ are zero since or v is constant or u is constant. Thus, the above expressions reduce to:
                          begin{equation}
                          q=L_{11} u'^2+v'^2 L_{22} \
                          p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
                          end{equation}

                          In addition $s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2+2 g_{12} u'v'+g_{22}v'^2}$ reduces to $s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2+g_{22}v'^2}$. We can now consider the two cases.




                          1. v=const


                          In such a case we have
                          begin{equation}
                          q=L_{11} u'^2 \
                          p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}\
                          s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2}
                          end{equation}




                          1. u =const


                          In such a case we have
                          begin{equation}
                          q=v'^2 L_{22} \
                          p=left[-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
                          s'=sqrt{g_{22}v'^2}
                          end{equation}

                          When computing the non zero coefficient of the first fundamental form for $sigma$, we have $g_{11}=g_{22}=rm sech^2(u)$, while non zero coefficient of the second fundamental form are $L_{11}=L_{22}=-rm sech^2(u)$. When replacing these coefficient in the above expression we have
                          1. v=const
                          begin{equation}
                          k_n=-1 \
                          k_g=0
                          end{equation}

                          because $Gamma_{11}^2=0$. Since the geodesic curvature is zero, the curve is a geodesic.




                          1. u=const
                            begin{equation}
                            k_n=-1 \
                            k_g=-rm sech{(u_0)}
                            end{equation}

                            where $u_0$ is the constant.
                            The definition of normal and geodesic curvature in your textbook can be written in term of p and q for practical computation.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 2 days ago









                          UpaxUpax

                          1,497613




                          1,497613






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2981352%2ffind-the-geodesic-and-normal-curvatures-of-a-surface%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Mario Kart Wii

                              What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

                              Antonio Litta Visconti Arese