Prove that minimum of $ f $ on $ |z| = 1 $ is no greater than $ |a_0| + cdots + |a_m| $












3














Let $ D $ be the open unit disk. Suppose $ f in H(D) cap C(bar{D}) $ and write $ f(z) = sum a_n z^n $ for $ |z| < 1 $. If $ f $ has exactly $ m $ zeros in $ D $, prove that
$$ min_{|z|=1} |f(z) | leq |a_0| + cdots + |a_m|. $$
My original idea was to prove by contradiction: suppose $$ |f(z)| > |a_0| + cdots + |a_m| geq |a_0 + a_1z + cdots + a_mz^m|. $$
Then if we can use Rouché's theorem, this implies that $ f $ has the same number of zeros as $ f -g $, which is $ m + 1 $, a contradiction. However I don't think I can apply Rouché's theorem since $ f $ is not known to be holomorphic on $ bar{D} $. How do I solve this problem?










share|cite|improve this question



























    3














    Let $ D $ be the open unit disk. Suppose $ f in H(D) cap C(bar{D}) $ and write $ f(z) = sum a_n z^n $ for $ |z| < 1 $. If $ f $ has exactly $ m $ zeros in $ D $, prove that
    $$ min_{|z|=1} |f(z) | leq |a_0| + cdots + |a_m|. $$
    My original idea was to prove by contradiction: suppose $$ |f(z)| > |a_0| + cdots + |a_m| geq |a_0 + a_1z + cdots + a_mz^m|. $$
    Then if we can use Rouché's theorem, this implies that $ f $ has the same number of zeros as $ f -g $, which is $ m + 1 $, a contradiction. However I don't think I can apply Rouché's theorem since $ f $ is not known to be holomorphic on $ bar{D} $. How do I solve this problem?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      3












      3








      3







      Let $ D $ be the open unit disk. Suppose $ f in H(D) cap C(bar{D}) $ and write $ f(z) = sum a_n z^n $ for $ |z| < 1 $. If $ f $ has exactly $ m $ zeros in $ D $, prove that
      $$ min_{|z|=1} |f(z) | leq |a_0| + cdots + |a_m|. $$
      My original idea was to prove by contradiction: suppose $$ |f(z)| > |a_0| + cdots + |a_m| geq |a_0 + a_1z + cdots + a_mz^m|. $$
      Then if we can use Rouché's theorem, this implies that $ f $ has the same number of zeros as $ f -g $, which is $ m + 1 $, a contradiction. However I don't think I can apply Rouché's theorem since $ f $ is not known to be holomorphic on $ bar{D} $. How do I solve this problem?










      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $ D $ be the open unit disk. Suppose $ f in H(D) cap C(bar{D}) $ and write $ f(z) = sum a_n z^n $ for $ |z| < 1 $. If $ f $ has exactly $ m $ zeros in $ D $, prove that
      $$ min_{|z|=1} |f(z) | leq |a_0| + cdots + |a_m|. $$
      My original idea was to prove by contradiction: suppose $$ |f(z)| > |a_0| + cdots + |a_m| geq |a_0 + a_1z + cdots + a_mz^m|. $$
      Then if we can use Rouché's theorem, this implies that $ f $ has the same number of zeros as $ f -g $, which is $ m + 1 $, a contradiction. However I don't think I can apply Rouché's theorem since $ f $ is not known to be holomorphic on $ bar{D} $. How do I solve this problem?







      complex-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 2 days ago









      lifeishard911

      1146




      1146






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          Just apply the same argument to the $|z|=1-epsilon$. $max |f(z)| >|a_0|+|a_1|+...+|a_m|$ implies $|f(z)| >|a_0+a_1z+...+a_mz^{m}|$ for $|z|=1-epsilon$ of $epsilon $ is small enough. Als0, number of zeros of a polynomial on the open disk equals the number of zeros on $|z|<1-epsilon$ for $epsilon $ is small enough.






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062625%2fprove-that-minimum-of-f-on-z-1-is-no-greater-than-a-0-cdots%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2














            Just apply the same argument to the $|z|=1-epsilon$. $max |f(z)| >|a_0|+|a_1|+...+|a_m|$ implies $|f(z)| >|a_0+a_1z+...+a_mz^{m}|$ for $|z|=1-epsilon$ of $epsilon $ is small enough. Als0, number of zeros of a polynomial on the open disk equals the number of zeros on $|z|<1-epsilon$ for $epsilon $ is small enough.






            share|cite|improve this answer




























              2














              Just apply the same argument to the $|z|=1-epsilon$. $max |f(z)| >|a_0|+|a_1|+...+|a_m|$ implies $|f(z)| >|a_0+a_1z+...+a_mz^{m}|$ for $|z|=1-epsilon$ of $epsilon $ is small enough. Als0, number of zeros of a polynomial on the open disk equals the number of zeros on $|z|<1-epsilon$ for $epsilon $ is small enough.






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                2












                2








                2






                Just apply the same argument to the $|z|=1-epsilon$. $max |f(z)| >|a_0|+|a_1|+...+|a_m|$ implies $|f(z)| >|a_0+a_1z+...+a_mz^{m}|$ for $|z|=1-epsilon$ of $epsilon $ is small enough. Als0, number of zeros of a polynomial on the open disk equals the number of zeros on $|z|<1-epsilon$ for $epsilon $ is small enough.






                share|cite|improve this answer














                Just apply the same argument to the $|z|=1-epsilon$. $max |f(z)| >|a_0|+|a_1|+...+|a_m|$ implies $|f(z)| >|a_0+a_1z+...+a_mz^{m}|$ for $|z|=1-epsilon$ of $epsilon $ is small enough. Als0, number of zeros of a polynomial on the open disk equals the number of zeros on $|z|<1-epsilon$ for $epsilon $ is small enough.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 2 days ago

























                answered 2 days ago









                Kavi Rama Murthy

                51.5k31855




                51.5k31855






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062625%2fprove-that-minimum-of-f-on-z-1-is-no-greater-than-a-0-cdots%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Mario Kart Wii

                    The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

                    Dobbiaco