Proof integration identity $int_{0}^{1}dxint_{0}^{x}e^{x^2}dy=int_{0}^{1}dyint_{y}^{1}e^{x^2}dx$












0












$begingroup$


I have to prove this identity:
$$int_{0}^{1}dxint_{0}^{x}e^{x^2}dy=int_{0}^{1}dyint_{y}^{1}e^{x^2}dx$$
I've shown that:
$$int_{0}^{1}dxint_{0}^{x}e^{x^2}dy=int_{0}^{1}xe^{x^2}dx=frac{1}{2}(e-1)$$



After i tried to solve the second member of identity in this way:



The first part is done by substituting $x^2$ in series
$$ e^{x} = 1 + x + frac{x^2}{2!} + frac{x^3}{3!} + cdots $$
yielding
$$e^{x^2} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} frac{x^{2n}}{n!} $$
Through some theorems as uniform continuity, then we can switch the order of integration and summation, that is:
$$int_{y}^{1} sum_{n=0}^{infty} frac{x^{2n}}{n!}dx= sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{1}{n!}int_{y}^{1} x^{2n}dx=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{1}{n!}*Big(1-frac{y^{2n+1}}{2n+1}Big)dx$$
And from here i'm not sure how to proceed. What can i do? Thanks for the help in advance!!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that $int_{0}^{1}dx=int_{0}^{1}dy$, so you only need to show $int_{0}^{x}e^{t^2}dt=int_{y}^{1}e^{t^2}dt$. Now, they are not equal as functions of $x$ and $y$
    $endgroup$
    – alexp9
    Jan 23 at 11:43










  • $begingroup$
    Beware in your notations. What you wrote in first line are products of 1-dim integrals but on second line you consider a 2-dim integral. Use parenthesis and let the $dx,dy$ at the end for 2-dim integrals. Thus what you are asking is not clear.
    $endgroup$
    – zwim
    Jan 23 at 12:01
















0












$begingroup$


I have to prove this identity:
$$int_{0}^{1}dxint_{0}^{x}e^{x^2}dy=int_{0}^{1}dyint_{y}^{1}e^{x^2}dx$$
I've shown that:
$$int_{0}^{1}dxint_{0}^{x}e^{x^2}dy=int_{0}^{1}xe^{x^2}dx=frac{1}{2}(e-1)$$



After i tried to solve the second member of identity in this way:



The first part is done by substituting $x^2$ in series
$$ e^{x} = 1 + x + frac{x^2}{2!} + frac{x^3}{3!} + cdots $$
yielding
$$e^{x^2} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} frac{x^{2n}}{n!} $$
Through some theorems as uniform continuity, then we can switch the order of integration and summation, that is:
$$int_{y}^{1} sum_{n=0}^{infty} frac{x^{2n}}{n!}dx= sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{1}{n!}int_{y}^{1} x^{2n}dx=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{1}{n!}*Big(1-frac{y^{2n+1}}{2n+1}Big)dx$$
And from here i'm not sure how to proceed. What can i do? Thanks for the help in advance!!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that $int_{0}^{1}dx=int_{0}^{1}dy$, so you only need to show $int_{0}^{x}e^{t^2}dt=int_{y}^{1}e^{t^2}dt$. Now, they are not equal as functions of $x$ and $y$
    $endgroup$
    – alexp9
    Jan 23 at 11:43










  • $begingroup$
    Beware in your notations. What you wrote in first line are products of 1-dim integrals but on second line you consider a 2-dim integral. Use parenthesis and let the $dx,dy$ at the end for 2-dim integrals. Thus what you are asking is not clear.
    $endgroup$
    – zwim
    Jan 23 at 12:01














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I have to prove this identity:
$$int_{0}^{1}dxint_{0}^{x}e^{x^2}dy=int_{0}^{1}dyint_{y}^{1}e^{x^2}dx$$
I've shown that:
$$int_{0}^{1}dxint_{0}^{x}e^{x^2}dy=int_{0}^{1}xe^{x^2}dx=frac{1}{2}(e-1)$$



After i tried to solve the second member of identity in this way:



The first part is done by substituting $x^2$ in series
$$ e^{x} = 1 + x + frac{x^2}{2!} + frac{x^3}{3!} + cdots $$
yielding
$$e^{x^2} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} frac{x^{2n}}{n!} $$
Through some theorems as uniform continuity, then we can switch the order of integration and summation, that is:
$$int_{y}^{1} sum_{n=0}^{infty} frac{x^{2n}}{n!}dx= sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{1}{n!}int_{y}^{1} x^{2n}dx=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{1}{n!}*Big(1-frac{y^{2n+1}}{2n+1}Big)dx$$
And from here i'm not sure how to proceed. What can i do? Thanks for the help in advance!!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have to prove this identity:
$$int_{0}^{1}dxint_{0}^{x}e^{x^2}dy=int_{0}^{1}dyint_{y}^{1}e^{x^2}dx$$
I've shown that:
$$int_{0}^{1}dxint_{0}^{x}e^{x^2}dy=int_{0}^{1}xe^{x^2}dx=frac{1}{2}(e-1)$$



After i tried to solve the second member of identity in this way:



The first part is done by substituting $x^2$ in series
$$ e^{x} = 1 + x + frac{x^2}{2!} + frac{x^3}{3!} + cdots $$
yielding
$$e^{x^2} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} frac{x^{2n}}{n!} $$
Through some theorems as uniform continuity, then we can switch the order of integration and summation, that is:
$$int_{y}^{1} sum_{n=0}^{infty} frac{x^{2n}}{n!}dx= sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{1}{n!}int_{y}^{1} x^{2n}dx=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{1}{n!}*Big(1-frac{y^{2n+1}}{2n+1}Big)dx$$
And from here i'm not sure how to proceed. What can i do? Thanks for the help in advance!!







real-analysis integration derivatives power-series






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 23 at 11:37







andrew

















asked Jan 23 at 11:32









andrewandrew

698




698








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that $int_{0}^{1}dx=int_{0}^{1}dy$, so you only need to show $int_{0}^{x}e^{t^2}dt=int_{y}^{1}e^{t^2}dt$. Now, they are not equal as functions of $x$ and $y$
    $endgroup$
    – alexp9
    Jan 23 at 11:43










  • $begingroup$
    Beware in your notations. What you wrote in first line are products of 1-dim integrals but on second line you consider a 2-dim integral. Use parenthesis and let the $dx,dy$ at the end for 2-dim integrals. Thus what you are asking is not clear.
    $endgroup$
    – zwim
    Jan 23 at 12:01














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that $int_{0}^{1}dx=int_{0}^{1}dy$, so you only need to show $int_{0}^{x}e^{t^2}dt=int_{y}^{1}e^{t^2}dt$. Now, they are not equal as functions of $x$ and $y$
    $endgroup$
    – alexp9
    Jan 23 at 11:43










  • $begingroup$
    Beware in your notations. What you wrote in first line are products of 1-dim integrals but on second line you consider a 2-dim integral. Use parenthesis and let the $dx,dy$ at the end for 2-dim integrals. Thus what you are asking is not clear.
    $endgroup$
    – zwim
    Jan 23 at 12:01








1




1




$begingroup$
Note that $int_{0}^{1}dx=int_{0}^{1}dy$, so you only need to show $int_{0}^{x}e^{t^2}dt=int_{y}^{1}e^{t^2}dt$. Now, they are not equal as functions of $x$ and $y$
$endgroup$
– alexp9
Jan 23 at 11:43




$begingroup$
Note that $int_{0}^{1}dx=int_{0}^{1}dy$, so you only need to show $int_{0}^{x}e^{t^2}dt=int_{y}^{1}e^{t^2}dt$. Now, they are not equal as functions of $x$ and $y$
$endgroup$
– alexp9
Jan 23 at 11:43












$begingroup$
Beware in your notations. What you wrote in first line are products of 1-dim integrals but on second line you consider a 2-dim integral. Use parenthesis and let the $dx,dy$ at the end for 2-dim integrals. Thus what you are asking is not clear.
$endgroup$
– zwim
Jan 23 at 12:01




$begingroup$
Beware in your notations. What you wrote in first line are products of 1-dim integrals but on second line you consider a 2-dim integral. Use parenthesis and let the $dx,dy$ at the end for 2-dim integrals. Thus what you are asking is not clear.
$endgroup$
– zwim
Jan 23 at 12:01










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Trying to calculate the iterated integrals is not the way here - one of those integrals will work in an elementary way, but the other won't.



No, this is a case of Fubini's theorem - the two integrals are the same because they're the same double integral over a triangle, integrated in the two possible orders. We wish to show that
$$int_0^1 int_0^x f(x,y),dy,dx = int_0^1int_y^1 f(x,y),dx,dy$$
for nice enough $f$. The function we're trying to integrate is continuous and bounded on this bounded set, and that's certainly nice enough.



Draw the picture:



Triangle



Integrating over $y$ first, our condition is that $0le yle x$. Integrating over $x$ first, our condition is that $yle xle 1$. Then, in both cases, the outer variable runs from $0$ to $1$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    thank you for your exposure ! @jmerry
    $endgroup$
    – andrew
    Jan 23 at 12:11













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084349%2fproof-integration-identity-int-01dx-int-0xex2dy-int-01dy-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

Trying to calculate the iterated integrals is not the way here - one of those integrals will work in an elementary way, but the other won't.



No, this is a case of Fubini's theorem - the two integrals are the same because they're the same double integral over a triangle, integrated in the two possible orders. We wish to show that
$$int_0^1 int_0^x f(x,y),dy,dx = int_0^1int_y^1 f(x,y),dx,dy$$
for nice enough $f$. The function we're trying to integrate is continuous and bounded on this bounded set, and that's certainly nice enough.



Draw the picture:



Triangle



Integrating over $y$ first, our condition is that $0le yle x$. Integrating over $x$ first, our condition is that $yle xle 1$. Then, in both cases, the outer variable runs from $0$ to $1$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    thank you for your exposure ! @jmerry
    $endgroup$
    – andrew
    Jan 23 at 12:11


















3












$begingroup$

Trying to calculate the iterated integrals is not the way here - one of those integrals will work in an elementary way, but the other won't.



No, this is a case of Fubini's theorem - the two integrals are the same because they're the same double integral over a triangle, integrated in the two possible orders. We wish to show that
$$int_0^1 int_0^x f(x,y),dy,dx = int_0^1int_y^1 f(x,y),dx,dy$$
for nice enough $f$. The function we're trying to integrate is continuous and bounded on this bounded set, and that's certainly nice enough.



Draw the picture:



Triangle



Integrating over $y$ first, our condition is that $0le yle x$. Integrating over $x$ first, our condition is that $yle xle 1$. Then, in both cases, the outer variable runs from $0$ to $1$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    thank you for your exposure ! @jmerry
    $endgroup$
    – andrew
    Jan 23 at 12:11
















3












3








3





$begingroup$

Trying to calculate the iterated integrals is not the way here - one of those integrals will work in an elementary way, but the other won't.



No, this is a case of Fubini's theorem - the two integrals are the same because they're the same double integral over a triangle, integrated in the two possible orders. We wish to show that
$$int_0^1 int_0^x f(x,y),dy,dx = int_0^1int_y^1 f(x,y),dx,dy$$
for nice enough $f$. The function we're trying to integrate is continuous and bounded on this bounded set, and that's certainly nice enough.



Draw the picture:



Triangle



Integrating over $y$ first, our condition is that $0le yle x$. Integrating over $x$ first, our condition is that $yle xle 1$. Then, in both cases, the outer variable runs from $0$ to $1$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Trying to calculate the iterated integrals is not the way here - one of those integrals will work in an elementary way, but the other won't.



No, this is a case of Fubini's theorem - the two integrals are the same because they're the same double integral over a triangle, integrated in the two possible orders. We wish to show that
$$int_0^1 int_0^x f(x,y),dy,dx = int_0^1int_y^1 f(x,y),dx,dy$$
for nice enough $f$. The function we're trying to integrate is continuous and bounded on this bounded set, and that's certainly nice enough.



Draw the picture:



Triangle



Integrating over $y$ first, our condition is that $0le yle x$. Integrating over $x$ first, our condition is that $yle xle 1$. Then, in both cases, the outer variable runs from $0$ to $1$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 23 at 11:52









jmerryjmerry

11.8k1527




11.8k1527












  • $begingroup$
    thank you for your exposure ! @jmerry
    $endgroup$
    – andrew
    Jan 23 at 12:11




















  • $begingroup$
    thank you for your exposure ! @jmerry
    $endgroup$
    – andrew
    Jan 23 at 12:11


















$begingroup$
thank you for your exposure ! @jmerry
$endgroup$
– andrew
Jan 23 at 12:11






$begingroup$
thank you for your exposure ! @jmerry
$endgroup$
– andrew
Jan 23 at 12:11




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084349%2fproof-integration-identity-int-01dx-int-0xex2dy-int-01dy-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?