Show that for every $x$ there exists a $n in mathbb{N}$ so that $f(x-(frac{1}{2})^{n} nabla f(x)) leq...
$begingroup$
Let $f: mathbb{R}^{n}rightarrowmathbb{R}$ be continuous and differentiable and positive.
As stated in the title show that for every $x$ there exists a $n in mathbb{N}$ so that
$f(x-(frac{1}{2})^{n} nabla f(x)) leq f(x)-(frac{1}{2})^{n+1} ||nabla f(x)||^2$
Given Hints: are Cauchy-Schwarz and the fundamental theorem of integral and differential calculus.
There is probably an equation of the function $f(x+y)$ so that you can rewrite it into an Integral from where I can work on, however nothing comes into my mind so far so that I could start. I hope someone will help me with this one!
inequality
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f: mathbb{R}^{n}rightarrowmathbb{R}$ be continuous and differentiable and positive.
As stated in the title show that for every $x$ there exists a $n in mathbb{N}$ so that
$f(x-(frac{1}{2})^{n} nabla f(x)) leq f(x)-(frac{1}{2})^{n+1} ||nabla f(x)||^2$
Given Hints: are Cauchy-Schwarz and the fundamental theorem of integral and differential calculus.
There is probably an equation of the function $f(x+y)$ so that you can rewrite it into an Integral from where I can work on, however nothing comes into my mind so far so that I could start. I hope someone will help me with this one!
inequality
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f: mathbb{R}^{n}rightarrowmathbb{R}$ be continuous and differentiable and positive.
As stated in the title show that for every $x$ there exists a $n in mathbb{N}$ so that
$f(x-(frac{1}{2})^{n} nabla f(x)) leq f(x)-(frac{1}{2})^{n+1} ||nabla f(x)||^2$
Given Hints: are Cauchy-Schwarz and the fundamental theorem of integral and differential calculus.
There is probably an equation of the function $f(x+y)$ so that you can rewrite it into an Integral from where I can work on, however nothing comes into my mind so far so that I could start. I hope someone will help me with this one!
inequality
$endgroup$
Let $f: mathbb{R}^{n}rightarrowmathbb{R}$ be continuous and differentiable and positive.
As stated in the title show that for every $x$ there exists a $n in mathbb{N}$ so that
$f(x-(frac{1}{2})^{n} nabla f(x)) leq f(x)-(frac{1}{2})^{n+1} ||nabla f(x)||^2$
Given Hints: are Cauchy-Schwarz and the fundamental theorem of integral and differential calculus.
There is probably an equation of the function $f(x+y)$ so that you can rewrite it into an Integral from where I can work on, however nothing comes into my mind so far so that I could start. I hope someone will help me with this one!
inequality
inequality
asked Jan 20 at 18:18
babemcnuggetsbabemcnuggets
1129
1129
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There is a really short answer to that. Recalling that $D_x f(v)=lim_{hrightarrow 0}frac{f(x)-f(x+hv)}{h}=nabla f(x)^Tv=$<$nabla f,v$> you can rewrite the inequality.
$f(x-(frac{1}{2})^{n} nabla f(x)) leq f(x)-(frac{1}{2})^{n+1} ||nabla f(x)||^2$
= $ (frac{1}{2}) ||nabla f(x)||^2 leq frac{f(x)-(x-(frac{1}{2})^{n} nabla f(x))}{frac{1}{2}^n}$ $(1)$
Let $h=(frac{1}{2})^{n}$ and $v=nabla f$. We see that for $lim_{hrightarrow 0}$ we get $frac{1}{2}||nabla f(x)||leq||nabla f(x)||^2$ in $(1)$. If we let $n$ be "big enough" the inequality therefore follows.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080941%2fshow-that-for-every-x-there-exists-a-n-in-mathbbn-so-that-fx-frac1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There is a really short answer to that. Recalling that $D_x f(v)=lim_{hrightarrow 0}frac{f(x)-f(x+hv)}{h}=nabla f(x)^Tv=$<$nabla f,v$> you can rewrite the inequality.
$f(x-(frac{1}{2})^{n} nabla f(x)) leq f(x)-(frac{1}{2})^{n+1} ||nabla f(x)||^2$
= $ (frac{1}{2}) ||nabla f(x)||^2 leq frac{f(x)-(x-(frac{1}{2})^{n} nabla f(x))}{frac{1}{2}^n}$ $(1)$
Let $h=(frac{1}{2})^{n}$ and $v=nabla f$. We see that for $lim_{hrightarrow 0}$ we get $frac{1}{2}||nabla f(x)||leq||nabla f(x)||^2$ in $(1)$. If we let $n$ be "big enough" the inequality therefore follows.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a really short answer to that. Recalling that $D_x f(v)=lim_{hrightarrow 0}frac{f(x)-f(x+hv)}{h}=nabla f(x)^Tv=$<$nabla f,v$> you can rewrite the inequality.
$f(x-(frac{1}{2})^{n} nabla f(x)) leq f(x)-(frac{1}{2})^{n+1} ||nabla f(x)||^2$
= $ (frac{1}{2}) ||nabla f(x)||^2 leq frac{f(x)-(x-(frac{1}{2})^{n} nabla f(x))}{frac{1}{2}^n}$ $(1)$
Let $h=(frac{1}{2})^{n}$ and $v=nabla f$. We see that for $lim_{hrightarrow 0}$ we get $frac{1}{2}||nabla f(x)||leq||nabla f(x)||^2$ in $(1)$. If we let $n$ be "big enough" the inequality therefore follows.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a really short answer to that. Recalling that $D_x f(v)=lim_{hrightarrow 0}frac{f(x)-f(x+hv)}{h}=nabla f(x)^Tv=$<$nabla f,v$> you can rewrite the inequality.
$f(x-(frac{1}{2})^{n} nabla f(x)) leq f(x)-(frac{1}{2})^{n+1} ||nabla f(x)||^2$
= $ (frac{1}{2}) ||nabla f(x)||^2 leq frac{f(x)-(x-(frac{1}{2})^{n} nabla f(x))}{frac{1}{2}^n}$ $(1)$
Let $h=(frac{1}{2})^{n}$ and $v=nabla f$. We see that for $lim_{hrightarrow 0}$ we get $frac{1}{2}||nabla f(x)||leq||nabla f(x)||^2$ in $(1)$. If we let $n$ be "big enough" the inequality therefore follows.
$endgroup$
There is a really short answer to that. Recalling that $D_x f(v)=lim_{hrightarrow 0}frac{f(x)-f(x+hv)}{h}=nabla f(x)^Tv=$<$nabla f,v$> you can rewrite the inequality.
$f(x-(frac{1}{2})^{n} nabla f(x)) leq f(x)-(frac{1}{2})^{n+1} ||nabla f(x)||^2$
= $ (frac{1}{2}) ||nabla f(x)||^2 leq frac{f(x)-(x-(frac{1}{2})^{n} nabla f(x))}{frac{1}{2}^n}$ $(1)$
Let $h=(frac{1}{2})^{n}$ and $v=nabla f$. We see that for $lim_{hrightarrow 0}$ we get $frac{1}{2}||nabla f(x)||leq||nabla f(x)||^2$ in $(1)$. If we let $n$ be "big enough" the inequality therefore follows.
answered Feb 1 at 22:45
babemcnuggetsbabemcnuggets
1129
1129
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080941%2fshow-that-for-every-x-there-exists-a-n-in-mathbbn-so-that-fx-frac1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown