Consider $X$ a countably infinite set, is ${X cup x}$ with $x notin X$ countably infinite?












0












$begingroup$


$x$ represents an element, not a set.



Assume $S:={X cup x}$ is countably finite. This means that there is a bijection between $S$ and a subset of $mathbb{N}$. This is clearly not the case since $X$ is infinite. I don't really know how to write down that last part rigorously. How can I approach this?



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You mean $x notin X$, not $X notin x$. Also, presumably $X cup {x}$ rather than ${X cup x}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 20 at 19:39








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Very important remark. Even if $X$ is really huge, ${X}$ is very very small. So small that it only has one element, $X$. Hence your set $S$ is countably finite (or simply finite) and it is in bijection with the subset of natural numbers consisting in just one element. The bijection is $Xcup xlongmapsto ninmathbb N$.
    $endgroup$
    – Dog_69
    Jan 20 at 19:39












  • $begingroup$
    I did not think about that! Thank you for your thoughtful remark. So if I was to consider $X cup x$, I could say it is countably infinite, right? How could that be proved?
    $endgroup$
    – Zachary
    Jan 20 at 19:44










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertIsrael I edited the question, thanks for noticing. However, I do mean ${X cup x}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Zachary
    Jan 20 at 19:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Zachary If $x$ is countable, yes. Maybe you meant $Xcup{ x}$?
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Jan 20 at 19:47
















0












$begingroup$


$x$ represents an element, not a set.



Assume $S:={X cup x}$ is countably finite. This means that there is a bijection between $S$ and a subset of $mathbb{N}$. This is clearly not the case since $X$ is infinite. I don't really know how to write down that last part rigorously. How can I approach this?



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You mean $x notin X$, not $X notin x$. Also, presumably $X cup {x}$ rather than ${X cup x}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 20 at 19:39








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Very important remark. Even if $X$ is really huge, ${X}$ is very very small. So small that it only has one element, $X$. Hence your set $S$ is countably finite (or simply finite) and it is in bijection with the subset of natural numbers consisting in just one element. The bijection is $Xcup xlongmapsto ninmathbb N$.
    $endgroup$
    – Dog_69
    Jan 20 at 19:39












  • $begingroup$
    I did not think about that! Thank you for your thoughtful remark. So if I was to consider $X cup x$, I could say it is countably infinite, right? How could that be proved?
    $endgroup$
    – Zachary
    Jan 20 at 19:44










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertIsrael I edited the question, thanks for noticing. However, I do mean ${X cup x}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Zachary
    Jan 20 at 19:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Zachary If $x$ is countable, yes. Maybe you meant $Xcup{ x}$?
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Jan 20 at 19:47














0












0








0





$begingroup$


$x$ represents an element, not a set.



Assume $S:={X cup x}$ is countably finite. This means that there is a bijection between $S$ and a subset of $mathbb{N}$. This is clearly not the case since $X$ is infinite. I don't really know how to write down that last part rigorously. How can I approach this?



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




$x$ represents an element, not a set.



Assume $S:={X cup x}$ is countably finite. This means that there is a bijection between $S$ and a subset of $mathbb{N}$. This is clearly not the case since $X$ is infinite. I don't really know how to write down that last part rigorously. How can I approach this?



Thanks in advance.







discrete-mathematics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 20 at 20:04







Zachary

















asked Jan 20 at 19:34









ZacharyZachary

1679




1679








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You mean $x notin X$, not $X notin x$. Also, presumably $X cup {x}$ rather than ${X cup x}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 20 at 19:39








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Very important remark. Even if $X$ is really huge, ${X}$ is very very small. So small that it only has one element, $X$. Hence your set $S$ is countably finite (or simply finite) and it is in bijection with the subset of natural numbers consisting in just one element. The bijection is $Xcup xlongmapsto ninmathbb N$.
    $endgroup$
    – Dog_69
    Jan 20 at 19:39












  • $begingroup$
    I did not think about that! Thank you for your thoughtful remark. So if I was to consider $X cup x$, I could say it is countably infinite, right? How could that be proved?
    $endgroup$
    – Zachary
    Jan 20 at 19:44










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertIsrael I edited the question, thanks for noticing. However, I do mean ${X cup x}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Zachary
    Jan 20 at 19:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Zachary If $x$ is countable, yes. Maybe you meant $Xcup{ x}$?
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Jan 20 at 19:47














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You mean $x notin X$, not $X notin x$. Also, presumably $X cup {x}$ rather than ${X cup x}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 20 at 19:39








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Very important remark. Even if $X$ is really huge, ${X}$ is very very small. So small that it only has one element, $X$. Hence your set $S$ is countably finite (or simply finite) and it is in bijection with the subset of natural numbers consisting in just one element. The bijection is $Xcup xlongmapsto ninmathbb N$.
    $endgroup$
    – Dog_69
    Jan 20 at 19:39












  • $begingroup$
    I did not think about that! Thank you for your thoughtful remark. So if I was to consider $X cup x$, I could say it is countably infinite, right? How could that be proved?
    $endgroup$
    – Zachary
    Jan 20 at 19:44










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertIsrael I edited the question, thanks for noticing. However, I do mean ${X cup x}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Zachary
    Jan 20 at 19:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Zachary If $x$ is countable, yes. Maybe you meant $Xcup{ x}$?
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Jan 20 at 19:47








1




1




$begingroup$
You mean $x notin X$, not $X notin x$. Also, presumably $X cup {x}$ rather than ${X cup x}$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 20 at 19:39






$begingroup$
You mean $x notin X$, not $X notin x$. Also, presumably $X cup {x}$ rather than ${X cup x}$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 20 at 19:39






2




2




$begingroup$
Very important remark. Even if $X$ is really huge, ${X}$ is very very small. So small that it only has one element, $X$. Hence your set $S$ is countably finite (or simply finite) and it is in bijection with the subset of natural numbers consisting in just one element. The bijection is $Xcup xlongmapsto ninmathbb N$.
$endgroup$
– Dog_69
Jan 20 at 19:39






$begingroup$
Very important remark. Even if $X$ is really huge, ${X}$ is very very small. So small that it only has one element, $X$. Hence your set $S$ is countably finite (or simply finite) and it is in bijection with the subset of natural numbers consisting in just one element. The bijection is $Xcup xlongmapsto ninmathbb N$.
$endgroup$
– Dog_69
Jan 20 at 19:39














$begingroup$
I did not think about that! Thank you for your thoughtful remark. So if I was to consider $X cup x$, I could say it is countably infinite, right? How could that be proved?
$endgroup$
– Zachary
Jan 20 at 19:44




$begingroup$
I did not think about that! Thank you for your thoughtful remark. So if I was to consider $X cup x$, I could say it is countably infinite, right? How could that be proved?
$endgroup$
– Zachary
Jan 20 at 19:44












$begingroup$
@RobertIsrael I edited the question, thanks for noticing. However, I do mean ${X cup x}$.
$endgroup$
– Zachary
Jan 20 at 19:46




$begingroup$
@RobertIsrael I edited the question, thanks for noticing. However, I do mean ${X cup x}$.
$endgroup$
– Zachary
Jan 20 at 19:46




1




1




$begingroup$
@Zachary If $x$ is countable, yes. Maybe you meant $Xcup{ x}$?
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Jan 20 at 19:47




$begingroup$
@Zachary If $x$ is countable, yes. Maybe you meant $Xcup{ x}$?
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Jan 20 at 19:47










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

As the comments point out, your notation is a little confusing. The set $S = lbrace Xcup xrbrace$ contains one element: $Xcup x$. In particular, $S$ is countable. On the other hand, the set $Xcup x$ may not be countable, even if $X$ is countable. This is because $x$ could be uncountable and disjoint from $X$. The statement you are probably looking for is the following:



Proposition. If $X$ is countable and $xnotin X$, then $Xcup lbrace xrbrace$ is countable.



In fact, something much stronger is true. If $X_1,X_2,dots $ is a sequence of countable sets (indexed over the natural numbers), then $bigcup_i^infty X_i$ is countable. To prove this, use that $mathbb Ntimesmathbb N$ is countable and construct a surjection $mathbb Ntimesmathbb Nrightarrow bigcup_i^infty X_i$. The proposition above is then the special case where $X_1 = X$, $X_2 = lbrace xrbrace$ and $X_i = varnothing$ for $i > 2$.



Addendum. Now how would you prove that $mathbb Ntimesmathbb N$ is countable? Here it may help to visualize $mathbb Ntimes mathbb N$ as the nodes of an infinite grid in the first quadrant of $mathbb R^2$. A natural way to "count" these nodes is to "spiral outwards".






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081048%2fconsider-x-a-countably-infinite-set-is-x-cup-x-with-x-notin-x-count%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    As the comments point out, your notation is a little confusing. The set $S = lbrace Xcup xrbrace$ contains one element: $Xcup x$. In particular, $S$ is countable. On the other hand, the set $Xcup x$ may not be countable, even if $X$ is countable. This is because $x$ could be uncountable and disjoint from $X$. The statement you are probably looking for is the following:



    Proposition. If $X$ is countable and $xnotin X$, then $Xcup lbrace xrbrace$ is countable.



    In fact, something much stronger is true. If $X_1,X_2,dots $ is a sequence of countable sets (indexed over the natural numbers), then $bigcup_i^infty X_i$ is countable. To prove this, use that $mathbb Ntimesmathbb N$ is countable and construct a surjection $mathbb Ntimesmathbb Nrightarrow bigcup_i^infty X_i$. The proposition above is then the special case where $X_1 = X$, $X_2 = lbrace xrbrace$ and $X_i = varnothing$ for $i > 2$.



    Addendum. Now how would you prove that $mathbb Ntimesmathbb N$ is countable? Here it may help to visualize $mathbb Ntimes mathbb N$ as the nodes of an infinite grid in the first quadrant of $mathbb R^2$. A natural way to "count" these nodes is to "spiral outwards".






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      As the comments point out, your notation is a little confusing. The set $S = lbrace Xcup xrbrace$ contains one element: $Xcup x$. In particular, $S$ is countable. On the other hand, the set $Xcup x$ may not be countable, even if $X$ is countable. This is because $x$ could be uncountable and disjoint from $X$. The statement you are probably looking for is the following:



      Proposition. If $X$ is countable and $xnotin X$, then $Xcup lbrace xrbrace$ is countable.



      In fact, something much stronger is true. If $X_1,X_2,dots $ is a sequence of countable sets (indexed over the natural numbers), then $bigcup_i^infty X_i$ is countable. To prove this, use that $mathbb Ntimesmathbb N$ is countable and construct a surjection $mathbb Ntimesmathbb Nrightarrow bigcup_i^infty X_i$. The proposition above is then the special case where $X_1 = X$, $X_2 = lbrace xrbrace$ and $X_i = varnothing$ for $i > 2$.



      Addendum. Now how would you prove that $mathbb Ntimesmathbb N$ is countable? Here it may help to visualize $mathbb Ntimes mathbb N$ as the nodes of an infinite grid in the first quadrant of $mathbb R^2$. A natural way to "count" these nodes is to "spiral outwards".






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        As the comments point out, your notation is a little confusing. The set $S = lbrace Xcup xrbrace$ contains one element: $Xcup x$. In particular, $S$ is countable. On the other hand, the set $Xcup x$ may not be countable, even if $X$ is countable. This is because $x$ could be uncountable and disjoint from $X$. The statement you are probably looking for is the following:



        Proposition. If $X$ is countable and $xnotin X$, then $Xcup lbrace xrbrace$ is countable.



        In fact, something much stronger is true. If $X_1,X_2,dots $ is a sequence of countable sets (indexed over the natural numbers), then $bigcup_i^infty X_i$ is countable. To prove this, use that $mathbb Ntimesmathbb N$ is countable and construct a surjection $mathbb Ntimesmathbb Nrightarrow bigcup_i^infty X_i$. The proposition above is then the special case where $X_1 = X$, $X_2 = lbrace xrbrace$ and $X_i = varnothing$ for $i > 2$.



        Addendum. Now how would you prove that $mathbb Ntimesmathbb N$ is countable? Here it may help to visualize $mathbb Ntimes mathbb N$ as the nodes of an infinite grid in the first quadrant of $mathbb R^2$. A natural way to "count" these nodes is to "spiral outwards".






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        As the comments point out, your notation is a little confusing. The set $S = lbrace Xcup xrbrace$ contains one element: $Xcup x$. In particular, $S$ is countable. On the other hand, the set $Xcup x$ may not be countable, even if $X$ is countable. This is because $x$ could be uncountable and disjoint from $X$. The statement you are probably looking for is the following:



        Proposition. If $X$ is countable and $xnotin X$, then $Xcup lbrace xrbrace$ is countable.



        In fact, something much stronger is true. If $X_1,X_2,dots $ is a sequence of countable sets (indexed over the natural numbers), then $bigcup_i^infty X_i$ is countable. To prove this, use that $mathbb Ntimesmathbb N$ is countable and construct a surjection $mathbb Ntimesmathbb Nrightarrow bigcup_i^infty X_i$. The proposition above is then the special case where $X_1 = X$, $X_2 = lbrace xrbrace$ and $X_i = varnothing$ for $i > 2$.



        Addendum. Now how would you prove that $mathbb Ntimesmathbb N$ is countable? Here it may help to visualize $mathbb Ntimes mathbb N$ as the nodes of an infinite grid in the first quadrant of $mathbb R^2$. A natural way to "count" these nodes is to "spiral outwards".







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jan 20 at 20:29

























        answered Jan 20 at 20:19









        o.h.o.h.

        4516




        4516






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081048%2fconsider-x-a-countably-infinite-set-is-x-cup-x-with-x-notin-x-count%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Mario Kart Wii

            The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

            What does “Dominus providebit” mean?