Probability of equal amount of heads
$begingroup$
Assume two gamblers throw coins randomly, and we are interested in probability that both end up with the same amount of heads.
The answer to this question suggests that it is enough to count the events where "exactly 3 out of six coins show heads". Why is this the correct intepretation?
I know that the answer is correct, since
$$ frac{1}{2^{2n}}sum_{j=0}^{n}left(begin{array}{c}n\jend{array}right)^2=frac{1}{2^{2n}}left(begin{array}{c}2n\nend{array}right)$$
holds by straightforwardly summing all events with different possible numbers of heads.
However, why do we understand it as the same as "exactly 3 out of 6 heads", if there are events where all heads or none heads suffice?
probability combinatorics
$endgroup$
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Assume two gamblers throw coins randomly, and we are interested in probability that both end up with the same amount of heads.
The answer to this question suggests that it is enough to count the events where "exactly 3 out of six coins show heads". Why is this the correct intepretation?
I know that the answer is correct, since
$$ frac{1}{2^{2n}}sum_{j=0}^{n}left(begin{array}{c}n\jend{array}right)^2=frac{1}{2^{2n}}left(begin{array}{c}2n\nend{array}right)$$
holds by straightforwardly summing all events with different possible numbers of heads.
However, why do we understand it as the same as "exactly 3 out of 6 heads", if there are events where all heads or none heads suffice?
probability combinatorics
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why not ask the user who posted that solution?
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 20 at 19:07
$begingroup$
Note: I think you missed the part where one person turns all of their's over. That stage is critical.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 20 at 19:08
$begingroup$
@lulu I think that answer is too old to expect a reply. Either way, yes, I didn't understand why the part you mention is critical for the interpretation.
$endgroup$
– Nutle
Jan 20 at 19:12
$begingroup$
That user is still active on the site. But, any way, if they both had $i$ Heads, then after turning them over one player has $3-i$ Heads, and $i+3-i=3$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 20 at 19:13
$begingroup$
with 9000+ answers I would expect his inbox being flooded constantly. :) Ping @hagen-von-eitzen for a comment? Anyway, this seems to be getting off the topic
$endgroup$
– Nutle
Jan 20 at 19:16
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Assume two gamblers throw coins randomly, and we are interested in probability that both end up with the same amount of heads.
The answer to this question suggests that it is enough to count the events where "exactly 3 out of six coins show heads". Why is this the correct intepretation?
I know that the answer is correct, since
$$ frac{1}{2^{2n}}sum_{j=0}^{n}left(begin{array}{c}n\jend{array}right)^2=frac{1}{2^{2n}}left(begin{array}{c}2n\nend{array}right)$$
holds by straightforwardly summing all events with different possible numbers of heads.
However, why do we understand it as the same as "exactly 3 out of 6 heads", if there are events where all heads or none heads suffice?
probability combinatorics
$endgroup$
Assume two gamblers throw coins randomly, and we are interested in probability that both end up with the same amount of heads.
The answer to this question suggests that it is enough to count the events where "exactly 3 out of six coins show heads". Why is this the correct intepretation?
I know that the answer is correct, since
$$ frac{1}{2^{2n}}sum_{j=0}^{n}left(begin{array}{c}n\jend{array}right)^2=frac{1}{2^{2n}}left(begin{array}{c}2n\nend{array}right)$$
holds by straightforwardly summing all events with different possible numbers of heads.
However, why do we understand it as the same as "exactly 3 out of 6 heads", if there are events where all heads or none heads suffice?
probability combinatorics
probability combinatorics
asked Jan 20 at 19:00
NutleNutle
320110
320110
$begingroup$
Why not ask the user who posted that solution?
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 20 at 19:07
$begingroup$
Note: I think you missed the part where one person turns all of their's over. That stage is critical.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 20 at 19:08
$begingroup$
@lulu I think that answer is too old to expect a reply. Either way, yes, I didn't understand why the part you mention is critical for the interpretation.
$endgroup$
– Nutle
Jan 20 at 19:12
$begingroup$
That user is still active on the site. But, any way, if they both had $i$ Heads, then after turning them over one player has $3-i$ Heads, and $i+3-i=3$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 20 at 19:13
$begingroup$
with 9000+ answers I would expect his inbox being flooded constantly. :) Ping @hagen-von-eitzen for a comment? Anyway, this seems to be getting off the topic
$endgroup$
– Nutle
Jan 20 at 19:16
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Why not ask the user who posted that solution?
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 20 at 19:07
$begingroup$
Note: I think you missed the part where one person turns all of their's over. That stage is critical.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 20 at 19:08
$begingroup$
@lulu I think that answer is too old to expect a reply. Either way, yes, I didn't understand why the part you mention is critical for the interpretation.
$endgroup$
– Nutle
Jan 20 at 19:12
$begingroup$
That user is still active on the site. But, any way, if they both had $i$ Heads, then after turning them over one player has $3-i$ Heads, and $i+3-i=3$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 20 at 19:13
$begingroup$
with 9000+ answers I would expect his inbox being flooded constantly. :) Ping @hagen-von-eitzen for a comment? Anyway, this seems to be getting off the topic
$endgroup$
– Nutle
Jan 20 at 19:16
$begingroup$
Why not ask the user who posted that solution?
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 20 at 19:07
$begingroup$
Why not ask the user who posted that solution?
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 20 at 19:07
$begingroup$
Note: I think you missed the part where one person turns all of their's over. That stage is critical.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 20 at 19:08
$begingroup$
Note: I think you missed the part where one person turns all of their's over. That stage is critical.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 20 at 19:08
$begingroup$
@lulu I think that answer is too old to expect a reply. Either way, yes, I didn't understand why the part you mention is critical for the interpretation.
$endgroup$
– Nutle
Jan 20 at 19:12
$begingroup$
@lulu I think that answer is too old to expect a reply. Either way, yes, I didn't understand why the part you mention is critical for the interpretation.
$endgroup$
– Nutle
Jan 20 at 19:12
$begingroup$
That user is still active on the site. But, any way, if they both had $i$ Heads, then after turning them over one player has $3-i$ Heads, and $i+3-i=3$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 20 at 19:13
$begingroup$
That user is still active on the site. But, any way, if they both had $i$ Heads, then after turning them over one player has $3-i$ Heads, and $i+3-i=3$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 20 at 19:13
$begingroup$
with 9000+ answers I would expect his inbox being flooded constantly. :) Ping @hagen-von-eitzen for a comment? Anyway, this seems to be getting off the topic
$endgroup$
– Nutle
Jan 20 at 19:16
$begingroup$
with 9000+ answers I would expect his inbox being flooded constantly. :) Ping @hagen-von-eitzen for a comment? Anyway, this seems to be getting off the topic
$endgroup$
– Nutle
Jan 20 at 19:16
|
show 3 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Lets even say they threw n coins each other. For any i < n the odds for a guy to get i heads is equal to the odds of getting n-i heads. So saying "whats the odds for both getting i heads" is the same as "whats the odds for one getting i heads and the second getting n-i heads?" if you sum up all the i's that smaller than n, you get the question "whats the odds to get n time heads for the both of them".
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080997%2fprobability-of-equal-amount-of-heads%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Lets even say they threw n coins each other. For any i < n the odds for a guy to get i heads is equal to the odds of getting n-i heads. So saying "whats the odds for both getting i heads" is the same as "whats the odds for one getting i heads and the second getting n-i heads?" if you sum up all the i's that smaller than n, you get the question "whats the odds to get n time heads for the both of them".
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Lets even say they threw n coins each other. For any i < n the odds for a guy to get i heads is equal to the odds of getting n-i heads. So saying "whats the odds for both getting i heads" is the same as "whats the odds for one getting i heads and the second getting n-i heads?" if you sum up all the i's that smaller than n, you get the question "whats the odds to get n time heads for the both of them".
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Lets even say they threw n coins each other. For any i < n the odds for a guy to get i heads is equal to the odds of getting n-i heads. So saying "whats the odds for both getting i heads" is the same as "whats the odds for one getting i heads and the second getting n-i heads?" if you sum up all the i's that smaller than n, you get the question "whats the odds to get n time heads for the both of them".
$endgroup$
Lets even say they threw n coins each other. For any i < n the odds for a guy to get i heads is equal to the odds of getting n-i heads. So saying "whats the odds for both getting i heads" is the same as "whats the odds for one getting i heads and the second getting n-i heads?" if you sum up all the i's that smaller than n, you get the question "whats the odds to get n time heads for the both of them".
answered Jan 20 at 19:12
ShaqShaq
2849
2849
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080997%2fprobability-of-equal-amount-of-heads%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Why not ask the user who posted that solution?
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 20 at 19:07
$begingroup$
Note: I think you missed the part where one person turns all of their's over. That stage is critical.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 20 at 19:08
$begingroup$
@lulu I think that answer is too old to expect a reply. Either way, yes, I didn't understand why the part you mention is critical for the interpretation.
$endgroup$
– Nutle
Jan 20 at 19:12
$begingroup$
That user is still active on the site. But, any way, if they both had $i$ Heads, then after turning them over one player has $3-i$ Heads, and $i+3-i=3$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 20 at 19:13
$begingroup$
with 9000+ answers I would expect his inbox being flooded constantly. :) Ping @hagen-von-eitzen for a comment? Anyway, this seems to be getting off the topic
$endgroup$
– Nutle
Jan 20 at 19:16