How is this a property of Pascal's triangle?












3












$begingroup$


For all non-negative integers $k$ and $n$,
$$
dbinom{k}{k} + dbinom{k+1}{k} + dbinom{k+2}{k} + ldots + dbinom{n}{k} = dbinom{n +1}{k+1}
$$



How is this a property of Pascal's triangle? I do not see at all how it relates. I'm looking for an explanation, as opposed to some calculation with algebraic manipulations.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What are you asking? Are you wondering why it is true, or rather (as it would seem) why it has anything to do with Pascal's triangle? The latter seems obvious, as all binomial coefficients can be found in Pascal's triangle...
    $endgroup$
    – Marc van Leeuwen
    Dec 26 '12 at 7:35
















3












$begingroup$


For all non-negative integers $k$ and $n$,
$$
dbinom{k}{k} + dbinom{k+1}{k} + dbinom{k+2}{k} + ldots + dbinom{n}{k} = dbinom{n +1}{k+1}
$$



How is this a property of Pascal's triangle? I do not see at all how it relates. I'm looking for an explanation, as opposed to some calculation with algebraic manipulations.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What are you asking? Are you wondering why it is true, or rather (as it would seem) why it has anything to do with Pascal's triangle? The latter seems obvious, as all binomial coefficients can be found in Pascal's triangle...
    $endgroup$
    – Marc van Leeuwen
    Dec 26 '12 at 7:35














3












3








3





$begingroup$


For all non-negative integers $k$ and $n$,
$$
dbinom{k}{k} + dbinom{k+1}{k} + dbinom{k+2}{k} + ldots + dbinom{n}{k} = dbinom{n +1}{k+1}
$$



How is this a property of Pascal's triangle? I do not see at all how it relates. I'm looking for an explanation, as opposed to some calculation with algebraic manipulations.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




For all non-negative integers $k$ and $n$,
$$
dbinom{k}{k} + dbinom{k+1}{k} + dbinom{k+2}{k} + ldots + dbinom{n}{k} = dbinom{n +1}{k+1}
$$



How is this a property of Pascal's triangle? I do not see at all how it relates. I'm looking for an explanation, as opposed to some calculation with algebraic manipulations.







combinatorics binomial-coefficients






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 26 '12 at 16:40









Mike Spivey

42.5k8142233




42.5k8142233










asked Dec 26 '12 at 0:30









AlanHAlanH

1,50412245




1,50412245












  • $begingroup$
    What are you asking? Are you wondering why it is true, or rather (as it would seem) why it has anything to do with Pascal's triangle? The latter seems obvious, as all binomial coefficients can be found in Pascal's triangle...
    $endgroup$
    – Marc van Leeuwen
    Dec 26 '12 at 7:35


















  • $begingroup$
    What are you asking? Are you wondering why it is true, or rather (as it would seem) why it has anything to do with Pascal's triangle? The latter seems obvious, as all binomial coefficients can be found in Pascal's triangle...
    $endgroup$
    – Marc van Leeuwen
    Dec 26 '12 at 7:35
















$begingroup$
What are you asking? Are you wondering why it is true, or rather (as it would seem) why it has anything to do with Pascal's triangle? The latter seems obvious, as all binomial coefficients can be found in Pascal's triangle...
$endgroup$
– Marc van Leeuwen
Dec 26 '12 at 7:35




$begingroup$
What are you asking? Are you wondering why it is true, or rather (as it would seem) why it has anything to do with Pascal's triangle? The latter seems obvious, as all binomial coefficients can be found in Pascal's triangle...
$endgroup$
– Marc van Leeuwen
Dec 26 '12 at 7:35










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















11












$begingroup$

The "usual" property of the Pascal triangle is $$dbinom{n+1}{k+1} = underbrace{dbinom{n}{k+1}}_{text{Up right term}} + underbrace{dbinom{n}k}_{text{Up left term}}$$
Now proceed along the up right branch i.e. $$dbinom{n}{k+1} = underbrace{dbinom{n-1}{k+1}}_{text{Up right term}} + underbrace{dbinom{n-1}{k}}_{text{Up right term}}$$
Now again take the up right branch and keep proceeding to finally end with
$$dbinom{k+1}{k+1} = dbinom{k}{k}$$
Now put these together to get what you want.



EDIT



$hskip2.5in$enter image description here
begin{align}
color{red}{dbinom{n+1}{k+1}} & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{n}{k+1}}\
& = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{n-1}{k+1}}\
& = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-2}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{n-2}{k+1}}\
& = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-2}{k}} + cdots color{blue}{dbinom{k+2}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{k+2}{k+1}}\
& = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-2}{k}} + cdots color{blue}{dbinom{k+2}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{k+1}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{k+1}{k+1}}\
& = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-2}{k}} + cdots color{blue}{dbinom{k+2}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{k+1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{k}{k}}
end{align}






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Those are very helpful graphics, is there a particularly easy way to make things like that? (A program, etc?)
    $endgroup$
    – AndrewG
    Dec 26 '12 at 1:22






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @AndrewGibson I made these pictures in $LaTeX$ using TikZ. I am a big fan of TikZ :). If you are comfortable with $LaTeX$, then TikZ is the thing to make the graphics.
    $endgroup$
    – user17762
    Dec 26 '12 at 1:26












  • $begingroup$
    Fantastic, thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – AndrewG
    Dec 26 '12 at 1:28










  • $begingroup$
    wow [filler...]
    $endgroup$
    – Belgi
    Dec 26 '12 at 21:07



















2












$begingroup$

By induction on $n$. If $n<k$ then the left hand side is an empty sum, and the right hand side has $0<n+1<k+1$ so $binom{n+1}{k+1}=0$. For $ngeq k$ assume the result for $n-1$, so one has
$$
dbinom{k}{k} + dbinom{k+1}{k} + dbinom{k+2}{k} + ldots + dbinom{n-1}{k} = dbinom n{k+1}.
$$

Substituting that into the equation to be proved, we need to show $binom n{k+1}+binom n{krlap{phantom+}}=binom{n+1}{k+1}$, which is a familiar identity.



There is also a direct combinatorial interpretation of the formula. If you choose a subset of $k+1$ from the $n+1$ numbers ${0,1,ldots,n}$, the last selected number $i$ satisfies $kleq ileq n$, and the remaining $k$ numbers can be chosen in $tbinom ik$ ways among ${0,ldots,i-1}$. Every subset is accounted for exactly once, so
$$sum_{i=k}^nbinom ik=binom{n+1}{k+1}.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    To add to Marvis answer note that the first equality in his answer is correct by this combinatorical argument:



    When chossing $k+1$ elements out of $n+1$ elements we have two choises (that do not intersect): Either the last (say we number them from $1$ to $n+1) $element is chosen or not.



    In the case that the last element is not chosen we have to choose all $k+1$ elements from $n$ elements (since the last one isn't picked) and in the second case we only need to choose another $k$ elements.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      1












      $begingroup$

      You're asking, for example, for the sum of all the indicated cells of Pascal's triangle



      $$ begin{matrix} cdot
      \ cdot & cdot
      \ cdot & cdot & cdot
      \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet &
      \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot
      \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot
      \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot & cdot
      \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot
      \ cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot
      end{matrix} $$



      which is the same thing as the sum of the cells



      $$ begin{matrix} cdot
      \ cdot & cdot
      \ cdot & cdot & cdot
      \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & circ
      \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot
      \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot
      \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot & cdot
      \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot
      \ cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot
      end{matrix} $$



      because I've added in zero. Now, what do you know about the sum of adjacent cells of Pascal's triangle?



      Of course, this method is still a calculation with algebraic manipulations, just organized in picture form.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f265146%2fhow-is-this-a-property-of-pascals-triangle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        11












        $begingroup$

        The "usual" property of the Pascal triangle is $$dbinom{n+1}{k+1} = underbrace{dbinom{n}{k+1}}_{text{Up right term}} + underbrace{dbinom{n}k}_{text{Up left term}}$$
        Now proceed along the up right branch i.e. $$dbinom{n}{k+1} = underbrace{dbinom{n-1}{k+1}}_{text{Up right term}} + underbrace{dbinom{n-1}{k}}_{text{Up right term}}$$
        Now again take the up right branch and keep proceeding to finally end with
        $$dbinom{k+1}{k+1} = dbinom{k}{k}$$
        Now put these together to get what you want.



        EDIT



        $hskip2.5in$enter image description here
        begin{align}
        color{red}{dbinom{n+1}{k+1}} & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{n}{k+1}}\
        & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{n-1}{k+1}}\
        & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-2}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{n-2}{k+1}}\
        & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-2}{k}} + cdots color{blue}{dbinom{k+2}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{k+2}{k+1}}\
        & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-2}{k}} + cdots color{blue}{dbinom{k+2}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{k+1}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{k+1}{k+1}}\
        & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-2}{k}} + cdots color{blue}{dbinom{k+2}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{k+1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{k}{k}}
        end{align}






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$













        • $begingroup$
          Those are very helpful graphics, is there a particularly easy way to make things like that? (A program, etc?)
          $endgroup$
          – AndrewG
          Dec 26 '12 at 1:22






        • 5




          $begingroup$
          @AndrewGibson I made these pictures in $LaTeX$ using TikZ. I am a big fan of TikZ :). If you are comfortable with $LaTeX$, then TikZ is the thing to make the graphics.
          $endgroup$
          – user17762
          Dec 26 '12 at 1:26












        • $begingroup$
          Fantastic, thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – AndrewG
          Dec 26 '12 at 1:28










        • $begingroup$
          wow [filler...]
          $endgroup$
          – Belgi
          Dec 26 '12 at 21:07
















        11












        $begingroup$

        The "usual" property of the Pascal triangle is $$dbinom{n+1}{k+1} = underbrace{dbinom{n}{k+1}}_{text{Up right term}} + underbrace{dbinom{n}k}_{text{Up left term}}$$
        Now proceed along the up right branch i.e. $$dbinom{n}{k+1} = underbrace{dbinom{n-1}{k+1}}_{text{Up right term}} + underbrace{dbinom{n-1}{k}}_{text{Up right term}}$$
        Now again take the up right branch and keep proceeding to finally end with
        $$dbinom{k+1}{k+1} = dbinom{k}{k}$$
        Now put these together to get what you want.



        EDIT



        $hskip2.5in$enter image description here
        begin{align}
        color{red}{dbinom{n+1}{k+1}} & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{n}{k+1}}\
        & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{n-1}{k+1}}\
        & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-2}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{n-2}{k+1}}\
        & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-2}{k}} + cdots color{blue}{dbinom{k+2}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{k+2}{k+1}}\
        & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-2}{k}} + cdots color{blue}{dbinom{k+2}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{k+1}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{k+1}{k+1}}\
        & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-2}{k}} + cdots color{blue}{dbinom{k+2}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{k+1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{k}{k}}
        end{align}






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$













        • $begingroup$
          Those are very helpful graphics, is there a particularly easy way to make things like that? (A program, etc?)
          $endgroup$
          – AndrewG
          Dec 26 '12 at 1:22






        • 5




          $begingroup$
          @AndrewGibson I made these pictures in $LaTeX$ using TikZ. I am a big fan of TikZ :). If you are comfortable with $LaTeX$, then TikZ is the thing to make the graphics.
          $endgroup$
          – user17762
          Dec 26 '12 at 1:26












        • $begingroup$
          Fantastic, thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – AndrewG
          Dec 26 '12 at 1:28










        • $begingroup$
          wow [filler...]
          $endgroup$
          – Belgi
          Dec 26 '12 at 21:07














        11












        11








        11





        $begingroup$

        The "usual" property of the Pascal triangle is $$dbinom{n+1}{k+1} = underbrace{dbinom{n}{k+1}}_{text{Up right term}} + underbrace{dbinom{n}k}_{text{Up left term}}$$
        Now proceed along the up right branch i.e. $$dbinom{n}{k+1} = underbrace{dbinom{n-1}{k+1}}_{text{Up right term}} + underbrace{dbinom{n-1}{k}}_{text{Up right term}}$$
        Now again take the up right branch and keep proceeding to finally end with
        $$dbinom{k+1}{k+1} = dbinom{k}{k}$$
        Now put these together to get what you want.



        EDIT



        $hskip2.5in$enter image description here
        begin{align}
        color{red}{dbinom{n+1}{k+1}} & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{n}{k+1}}\
        & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{n-1}{k+1}}\
        & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-2}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{n-2}{k+1}}\
        & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-2}{k}} + cdots color{blue}{dbinom{k+2}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{k+2}{k+1}}\
        & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-2}{k}} + cdots color{blue}{dbinom{k+2}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{k+1}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{k+1}{k+1}}\
        & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-2}{k}} + cdots color{blue}{dbinom{k+2}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{k+1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{k}{k}}
        end{align}






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        The "usual" property of the Pascal triangle is $$dbinom{n+1}{k+1} = underbrace{dbinom{n}{k+1}}_{text{Up right term}} + underbrace{dbinom{n}k}_{text{Up left term}}$$
        Now proceed along the up right branch i.e. $$dbinom{n}{k+1} = underbrace{dbinom{n-1}{k+1}}_{text{Up right term}} + underbrace{dbinom{n-1}{k}}_{text{Up right term}}$$
        Now again take the up right branch and keep proceeding to finally end with
        $$dbinom{k+1}{k+1} = dbinom{k}{k}$$
        Now put these together to get what you want.



        EDIT



        $hskip2.5in$enter image description here
        begin{align}
        color{red}{dbinom{n+1}{k+1}} & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{n}{k+1}}\
        & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{n-1}{k+1}}\
        & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-2}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{n-2}{k+1}}\
        & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-2}{k}} + cdots color{blue}{dbinom{k+2}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{k+2}{k+1}}\
        & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-2}{k}} + cdots color{blue}{dbinom{k+2}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{k+1}{k}} + color{red}{dbinom{k+1}{k+1}}\
        & = color{blue}{dbinom{n}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{n-2}{k}} + cdots color{blue}{dbinom{k+2}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{k+1}{k}} + color{blue}{dbinom{k}{k}}
        end{align}







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 26 '12 at 1:21

























        answered Dec 26 '12 at 0:36







        user17762



















        • $begingroup$
          Those are very helpful graphics, is there a particularly easy way to make things like that? (A program, etc?)
          $endgroup$
          – AndrewG
          Dec 26 '12 at 1:22






        • 5




          $begingroup$
          @AndrewGibson I made these pictures in $LaTeX$ using TikZ. I am a big fan of TikZ :). If you are comfortable with $LaTeX$, then TikZ is the thing to make the graphics.
          $endgroup$
          – user17762
          Dec 26 '12 at 1:26












        • $begingroup$
          Fantastic, thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – AndrewG
          Dec 26 '12 at 1:28










        • $begingroup$
          wow [filler...]
          $endgroup$
          – Belgi
          Dec 26 '12 at 21:07


















        • $begingroup$
          Those are very helpful graphics, is there a particularly easy way to make things like that? (A program, etc?)
          $endgroup$
          – AndrewG
          Dec 26 '12 at 1:22






        • 5




          $begingroup$
          @AndrewGibson I made these pictures in $LaTeX$ using TikZ. I am a big fan of TikZ :). If you are comfortable with $LaTeX$, then TikZ is the thing to make the graphics.
          $endgroup$
          – user17762
          Dec 26 '12 at 1:26












        • $begingroup$
          Fantastic, thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – AndrewG
          Dec 26 '12 at 1:28










        • $begingroup$
          wow [filler...]
          $endgroup$
          – Belgi
          Dec 26 '12 at 21:07
















        $begingroup$
        Those are very helpful graphics, is there a particularly easy way to make things like that? (A program, etc?)
        $endgroup$
        – AndrewG
        Dec 26 '12 at 1:22




        $begingroup$
        Those are very helpful graphics, is there a particularly easy way to make things like that? (A program, etc?)
        $endgroup$
        – AndrewG
        Dec 26 '12 at 1:22




        5




        5




        $begingroup$
        @AndrewGibson I made these pictures in $LaTeX$ using TikZ. I am a big fan of TikZ :). If you are comfortable with $LaTeX$, then TikZ is the thing to make the graphics.
        $endgroup$
        – user17762
        Dec 26 '12 at 1:26






        $begingroup$
        @AndrewGibson I made these pictures in $LaTeX$ using TikZ. I am a big fan of TikZ :). If you are comfortable with $LaTeX$, then TikZ is the thing to make the graphics.
        $endgroup$
        – user17762
        Dec 26 '12 at 1:26














        $begingroup$
        Fantastic, thanks!
        $endgroup$
        – AndrewG
        Dec 26 '12 at 1:28




        $begingroup$
        Fantastic, thanks!
        $endgroup$
        – AndrewG
        Dec 26 '12 at 1:28












        $begingroup$
        wow [filler...]
        $endgroup$
        – Belgi
        Dec 26 '12 at 21:07




        $begingroup$
        wow [filler...]
        $endgroup$
        – Belgi
        Dec 26 '12 at 21:07











        2












        $begingroup$

        By induction on $n$. If $n<k$ then the left hand side is an empty sum, and the right hand side has $0<n+1<k+1$ so $binom{n+1}{k+1}=0$. For $ngeq k$ assume the result for $n-1$, so one has
        $$
        dbinom{k}{k} + dbinom{k+1}{k} + dbinom{k+2}{k} + ldots + dbinom{n-1}{k} = dbinom n{k+1}.
        $$

        Substituting that into the equation to be proved, we need to show $binom n{k+1}+binom n{krlap{phantom+}}=binom{n+1}{k+1}$, which is a familiar identity.



        There is also a direct combinatorial interpretation of the formula. If you choose a subset of $k+1$ from the $n+1$ numbers ${0,1,ldots,n}$, the last selected number $i$ satisfies $kleq ileq n$, and the remaining $k$ numbers can be chosen in $tbinom ik$ ways among ${0,ldots,i-1}$. Every subset is accounted for exactly once, so
        $$sum_{i=k}^nbinom ik=binom{n+1}{k+1}.
        $$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$


















          2












          $begingroup$

          By induction on $n$. If $n<k$ then the left hand side is an empty sum, and the right hand side has $0<n+1<k+1$ so $binom{n+1}{k+1}=0$. For $ngeq k$ assume the result for $n-1$, so one has
          $$
          dbinom{k}{k} + dbinom{k+1}{k} + dbinom{k+2}{k} + ldots + dbinom{n-1}{k} = dbinom n{k+1}.
          $$

          Substituting that into the equation to be proved, we need to show $binom n{k+1}+binom n{krlap{phantom+}}=binom{n+1}{k+1}$, which is a familiar identity.



          There is also a direct combinatorial interpretation of the formula. If you choose a subset of $k+1$ from the $n+1$ numbers ${0,1,ldots,n}$, the last selected number $i$ satisfies $kleq ileq n$, and the remaining $k$ numbers can be chosen in $tbinom ik$ ways among ${0,ldots,i-1}$. Every subset is accounted for exactly once, so
          $$sum_{i=k}^nbinom ik=binom{n+1}{k+1}.
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$
















            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            By induction on $n$. If $n<k$ then the left hand side is an empty sum, and the right hand side has $0<n+1<k+1$ so $binom{n+1}{k+1}=0$. For $ngeq k$ assume the result for $n-1$, so one has
            $$
            dbinom{k}{k} + dbinom{k+1}{k} + dbinom{k+2}{k} + ldots + dbinom{n-1}{k} = dbinom n{k+1}.
            $$

            Substituting that into the equation to be proved, we need to show $binom n{k+1}+binom n{krlap{phantom+}}=binom{n+1}{k+1}$, which is a familiar identity.



            There is also a direct combinatorial interpretation of the formula. If you choose a subset of $k+1$ from the $n+1$ numbers ${0,1,ldots,n}$, the last selected number $i$ satisfies $kleq ileq n$, and the remaining $k$ numbers can be chosen in $tbinom ik$ ways among ${0,ldots,i-1}$. Every subset is accounted for exactly once, so
            $$sum_{i=k}^nbinom ik=binom{n+1}{k+1}.
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            By induction on $n$. If $n<k$ then the left hand side is an empty sum, and the right hand side has $0<n+1<k+1$ so $binom{n+1}{k+1}=0$. For $ngeq k$ assume the result for $n-1$, so one has
            $$
            dbinom{k}{k} + dbinom{k+1}{k} + dbinom{k+2}{k} + ldots + dbinom{n-1}{k} = dbinom n{k+1}.
            $$

            Substituting that into the equation to be proved, we need to show $binom n{k+1}+binom n{krlap{phantom+}}=binom{n+1}{k+1}$, which is a familiar identity.



            There is also a direct combinatorial interpretation of the formula. If you choose a subset of $k+1$ from the $n+1$ numbers ${0,1,ldots,n}$, the last selected number $i$ satisfies $kleq ileq n$, and the remaining $k$ numbers can be chosen in $tbinom ik$ ways among ${0,ldots,i-1}$. Every subset is accounted for exactly once, so
            $$sum_{i=k}^nbinom ik=binom{n+1}{k+1}.
            $$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Jan 16 at 12:53

























            answered Dec 26 '12 at 9:57









            Marc van LeeuwenMarc van Leeuwen

            87.1k5107223




            87.1k5107223























                1












                $begingroup$

                To add to Marvis answer note that the first equality in his answer is correct by this combinatorical argument:



                When chossing $k+1$ elements out of $n+1$ elements we have two choises (that do not intersect): Either the last (say we number them from $1$ to $n+1) $element is chosen or not.



                In the case that the last element is not chosen we have to choose all $k+1$ elements from $n$ elements (since the last one isn't picked) and in the second case we only need to choose another $k$ elements.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  To add to Marvis answer note that the first equality in his answer is correct by this combinatorical argument:



                  When chossing $k+1$ elements out of $n+1$ elements we have two choises (that do not intersect): Either the last (say we number them from $1$ to $n+1) $element is chosen or not.



                  In the case that the last element is not chosen we have to choose all $k+1$ elements from $n$ elements (since the last one isn't picked) and in the second case we only need to choose another $k$ elements.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    1












                    1








                    1





                    $begingroup$

                    To add to Marvis answer note that the first equality in his answer is correct by this combinatorical argument:



                    When chossing $k+1$ elements out of $n+1$ elements we have two choises (that do not intersect): Either the last (say we number them from $1$ to $n+1) $element is chosen or not.



                    In the case that the last element is not chosen we have to choose all $k+1$ elements from $n$ elements (since the last one isn't picked) and in the second case we only need to choose another $k$ elements.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    To add to Marvis answer note that the first equality in his answer is correct by this combinatorical argument:



                    When chossing $k+1$ elements out of $n+1$ elements we have two choises (that do not intersect): Either the last (say we number them from $1$ to $n+1) $element is chosen or not.



                    In the case that the last element is not chosen we have to choose all $k+1$ elements from $n$ elements (since the last one isn't picked) and in the second case we only need to choose another $k$ elements.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Dec 26 '12 at 0:40









                    BelgiBelgi

                    14.6k1054115




                    14.6k1054115























                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        You're asking, for example, for the sum of all the indicated cells of Pascal's triangle



                        $$ begin{matrix} cdot
                        \ cdot & cdot
                        \ cdot & cdot & cdot
                        \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet &
                        \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot
                        \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot
                        \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot & cdot
                        \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot
                        \ cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot
                        end{matrix} $$



                        which is the same thing as the sum of the cells



                        $$ begin{matrix} cdot
                        \ cdot & cdot
                        \ cdot & cdot & cdot
                        \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & circ
                        \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot
                        \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot
                        \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot & cdot
                        \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot
                        \ cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot
                        end{matrix} $$



                        because I've added in zero. Now, what do you know about the sum of adjacent cells of Pascal's triangle?



                        Of course, this method is still a calculation with algebraic manipulations, just organized in picture form.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          You're asking, for example, for the sum of all the indicated cells of Pascal's triangle



                          $$ begin{matrix} cdot
                          \ cdot & cdot
                          \ cdot & cdot & cdot
                          \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet &
                          \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot
                          \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot
                          \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot & cdot
                          \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot
                          \ cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot
                          end{matrix} $$



                          which is the same thing as the sum of the cells



                          $$ begin{matrix} cdot
                          \ cdot & cdot
                          \ cdot & cdot & cdot
                          \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & circ
                          \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot
                          \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot
                          \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot & cdot
                          \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot
                          \ cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot
                          end{matrix} $$



                          because I've added in zero. Now, what do you know about the sum of adjacent cells of Pascal's triangle?



                          Of course, this method is still a calculation with algebraic manipulations, just organized in picture form.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            You're asking, for example, for the sum of all the indicated cells of Pascal's triangle



                            $$ begin{matrix} cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet &
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot
                            end{matrix} $$



                            which is the same thing as the sum of the cells



                            $$ begin{matrix} cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & circ
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot
                            end{matrix} $$



                            because I've added in zero. Now, what do you know about the sum of adjacent cells of Pascal's triangle?



                            Of course, this method is still a calculation with algebraic manipulations, just organized in picture form.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            You're asking, for example, for the sum of all the indicated cells of Pascal's triangle



                            $$ begin{matrix} cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet &
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot
                            end{matrix} $$



                            which is the same thing as the sum of the cells



                            $$ begin{matrix} cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & circ
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & bullet & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot
                            \ cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot & cdot
                            end{matrix} $$



                            because I've added in zero. Now, what do you know about the sum of adjacent cells of Pascal's triangle?



                            Of course, this method is still a calculation with algebraic manipulations, just organized in picture form.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Dec 26 '12 at 1:25









                            HurkylHurkyl

                            111k9119262




                            111k9119262






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f265146%2fhow-is-this-a-property-of-pascals-triangle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Mario Kart Wii

                                Understanding the size os this class of aleatory events

                                Partial Derivative Guidance.