Poncelet porism for two intersecting circles…
$begingroup$
I was already studying about Poncelet porism but unfortunately I couldn't find any useful thing about this theorem for two intersecting circles. even I don't know if it is true for intersecting circles .
I draw some pictures using GeoGebra and I find out after some finite steps of drawing tangents ($n$) the last tangency point will be one of the meeting points of circles therefore ($n+1$)th and $n$th tangent would be coincident and then ($n+2$)th and ($n-2)$th tangent would be coincident and the process follows till the ($2n$)th tangent coincide the first one so it seems the theorem is also true for intersecting circles but I can't find any mathematical proof for it. I tried to prove it using inversion like when two circles lie entirely one within the other but it is not possible to find an inversion such that circles become concentric.
please let me know if it this theorem is also true for meeting circles and how can I prove it or recommend some sources or links for this beautiful theorem. thanks!
edit: I just download an essay here
according to link if there are two circles satisfying the formula $d^2=R^2-2Rr$ where $R,r$ are radius of circles and $d$ is distance between their centers, then there are infinitely many triangles inscribed in one and circumscribed about the other circle. how can I prove it?
this link may also help.
please let us to consider and solve the last part first. thanks in advance
geometry
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I was already studying about Poncelet porism but unfortunately I couldn't find any useful thing about this theorem for two intersecting circles. even I don't know if it is true for intersecting circles .
I draw some pictures using GeoGebra and I find out after some finite steps of drawing tangents ($n$) the last tangency point will be one of the meeting points of circles therefore ($n+1$)th and $n$th tangent would be coincident and then ($n+2$)th and ($n-2)$th tangent would be coincident and the process follows till the ($2n$)th tangent coincide the first one so it seems the theorem is also true for intersecting circles but I can't find any mathematical proof for it. I tried to prove it using inversion like when two circles lie entirely one within the other but it is not possible to find an inversion such that circles become concentric.
please let me know if it this theorem is also true for meeting circles and how can I prove it or recommend some sources or links for this beautiful theorem. thanks!
edit: I just download an essay here
according to link if there are two circles satisfying the formula $d^2=R^2-2Rr$ where $R,r$ are radius of circles and $d$ is distance between their centers, then there are infinitely many triangles inscribed in one and circumscribed about the other circle. how can I prove it?
this link may also help.
please let us to consider and solve the last part first. thanks in advance
geometry
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I would like to see what happens if one goes through the proof in my bachelor's thesis: An explicit algebro-geometric proof of Poncelet's closure theorem. What are the equations of your circles?
$endgroup$
– Ricardo Buring
Jan 16 at 21:33
$begingroup$
Take the simplest case: a triangle. Specifically, consider $triangle ABC$, its circumcircle, and one of its excircles (say, the one opposite $A$). Let $A^prime$ be a point on the circumcircle (but outside the excircle), and let the tangents through $A$ to the excircle meet the circumcircle at $B^prime$ and $C^prime$. A GeoGebra sketch suggests (though I have not yet formally proven) that $overline{B^prime C^prime}$ is also tangent to the excircle, which (if true) validates the "intersecting Poncelet" notion for triangles.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Jan 17 at 6:01
$begingroup$
@Blue see here for this case : cut-the-knot.org/Curriculum/Geometry/Poncelet3E.shtml
$endgroup$
– math enthusiastic
Jan 17 at 6:08
$begingroup$
@RicardoBuring you mean this theorem can be true for meeting circles with specific equation not all of them? I just try it for two arbitrary circles
$endgroup$
– math enthusiastic
Jan 17 at 6:08
$begingroup$
@mathenthusiastic: I had a feeling the excircle result was known. :) As to your question to Ricardo: Note that Poncelet says "If a path closes for one starting point, then it closes for any starting point." Poncelet does not guarantee a closing path for arbitrary circles.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Jan 17 at 6:13
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I was already studying about Poncelet porism but unfortunately I couldn't find any useful thing about this theorem for two intersecting circles. even I don't know if it is true for intersecting circles .
I draw some pictures using GeoGebra and I find out after some finite steps of drawing tangents ($n$) the last tangency point will be one of the meeting points of circles therefore ($n+1$)th and $n$th tangent would be coincident and then ($n+2$)th and ($n-2)$th tangent would be coincident and the process follows till the ($2n$)th tangent coincide the first one so it seems the theorem is also true for intersecting circles but I can't find any mathematical proof for it. I tried to prove it using inversion like when two circles lie entirely one within the other but it is not possible to find an inversion such that circles become concentric.
please let me know if it this theorem is also true for meeting circles and how can I prove it or recommend some sources or links for this beautiful theorem. thanks!
edit: I just download an essay here
according to link if there are two circles satisfying the formula $d^2=R^2-2Rr$ where $R,r$ are radius of circles and $d$ is distance between their centers, then there are infinitely many triangles inscribed in one and circumscribed about the other circle. how can I prove it?
this link may also help.
please let us to consider and solve the last part first. thanks in advance
geometry
$endgroup$
I was already studying about Poncelet porism but unfortunately I couldn't find any useful thing about this theorem for two intersecting circles. even I don't know if it is true for intersecting circles .
I draw some pictures using GeoGebra and I find out after some finite steps of drawing tangents ($n$) the last tangency point will be one of the meeting points of circles therefore ($n+1$)th and $n$th tangent would be coincident and then ($n+2$)th and ($n-2)$th tangent would be coincident and the process follows till the ($2n$)th tangent coincide the first one so it seems the theorem is also true for intersecting circles but I can't find any mathematical proof for it. I tried to prove it using inversion like when two circles lie entirely one within the other but it is not possible to find an inversion such that circles become concentric.
please let me know if it this theorem is also true for meeting circles and how can I prove it or recommend some sources or links for this beautiful theorem. thanks!
edit: I just download an essay here
according to link if there are two circles satisfying the formula $d^2=R^2-2Rr$ where $R,r$ are radius of circles and $d$ is distance between their centers, then there are infinitely many triangles inscribed in one and circumscribed about the other circle. how can I prove it?
this link may also help.
please let us to consider and solve the last part first. thanks in advance
geometry
geometry
edited Jan 17 at 7:10
math enthusiastic
asked Jan 16 at 15:59
math enthusiasticmath enthusiastic
462112
462112
$begingroup$
I would like to see what happens if one goes through the proof in my bachelor's thesis: An explicit algebro-geometric proof of Poncelet's closure theorem. What are the equations of your circles?
$endgroup$
– Ricardo Buring
Jan 16 at 21:33
$begingroup$
Take the simplest case: a triangle. Specifically, consider $triangle ABC$, its circumcircle, and one of its excircles (say, the one opposite $A$). Let $A^prime$ be a point on the circumcircle (but outside the excircle), and let the tangents through $A$ to the excircle meet the circumcircle at $B^prime$ and $C^prime$. A GeoGebra sketch suggests (though I have not yet formally proven) that $overline{B^prime C^prime}$ is also tangent to the excircle, which (if true) validates the "intersecting Poncelet" notion for triangles.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Jan 17 at 6:01
$begingroup$
@Blue see here for this case : cut-the-knot.org/Curriculum/Geometry/Poncelet3E.shtml
$endgroup$
– math enthusiastic
Jan 17 at 6:08
$begingroup$
@RicardoBuring you mean this theorem can be true for meeting circles with specific equation not all of them? I just try it for two arbitrary circles
$endgroup$
– math enthusiastic
Jan 17 at 6:08
$begingroup$
@mathenthusiastic: I had a feeling the excircle result was known. :) As to your question to Ricardo: Note that Poncelet says "If a path closes for one starting point, then it closes for any starting point." Poncelet does not guarantee a closing path for arbitrary circles.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Jan 17 at 6:13
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I would like to see what happens if one goes through the proof in my bachelor's thesis: An explicit algebro-geometric proof of Poncelet's closure theorem. What are the equations of your circles?
$endgroup$
– Ricardo Buring
Jan 16 at 21:33
$begingroup$
Take the simplest case: a triangle. Specifically, consider $triangle ABC$, its circumcircle, and one of its excircles (say, the one opposite $A$). Let $A^prime$ be a point on the circumcircle (but outside the excircle), and let the tangents through $A$ to the excircle meet the circumcircle at $B^prime$ and $C^prime$. A GeoGebra sketch suggests (though I have not yet formally proven) that $overline{B^prime C^prime}$ is also tangent to the excircle, which (if true) validates the "intersecting Poncelet" notion for triangles.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Jan 17 at 6:01
$begingroup$
@Blue see here for this case : cut-the-knot.org/Curriculum/Geometry/Poncelet3E.shtml
$endgroup$
– math enthusiastic
Jan 17 at 6:08
$begingroup$
@RicardoBuring you mean this theorem can be true for meeting circles with specific equation not all of them? I just try it for two arbitrary circles
$endgroup$
– math enthusiastic
Jan 17 at 6:08
$begingroup$
@mathenthusiastic: I had a feeling the excircle result was known. :) As to your question to Ricardo: Note that Poncelet says "If a path closes for one starting point, then it closes for any starting point." Poncelet does not guarantee a closing path for arbitrary circles.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Jan 17 at 6:13
$begingroup$
I would like to see what happens if one goes through the proof in my bachelor's thesis: An explicit algebro-geometric proof of Poncelet's closure theorem. What are the equations of your circles?
$endgroup$
– Ricardo Buring
Jan 16 at 21:33
$begingroup$
I would like to see what happens if one goes through the proof in my bachelor's thesis: An explicit algebro-geometric proof of Poncelet's closure theorem. What are the equations of your circles?
$endgroup$
– Ricardo Buring
Jan 16 at 21:33
$begingroup$
Take the simplest case: a triangle. Specifically, consider $triangle ABC$, its circumcircle, and one of its excircles (say, the one opposite $A$). Let $A^prime$ be a point on the circumcircle (but outside the excircle), and let the tangents through $A$ to the excircle meet the circumcircle at $B^prime$ and $C^prime$. A GeoGebra sketch suggests (though I have not yet formally proven) that $overline{B^prime C^prime}$ is also tangent to the excircle, which (if true) validates the "intersecting Poncelet" notion for triangles.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Jan 17 at 6:01
$begingroup$
Take the simplest case: a triangle. Specifically, consider $triangle ABC$, its circumcircle, and one of its excircles (say, the one opposite $A$). Let $A^prime$ be a point on the circumcircle (but outside the excircle), and let the tangents through $A$ to the excircle meet the circumcircle at $B^prime$ and $C^prime$. A GeoGebra sketch suggests (though I have not yet formally proven) that $overline{B^prime C^prime}$ is also tangent to the excircle, which (if true) validates the "intersecting Poncelet" notion for triangles.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Jan 17 at 6:01
$begingroup$
@Blue see here for this case : cut-the-knot.org/Curriculum/Geometry/Poncelet3E.shtml
$endgroup$
– math enthusiastic
Jan 17 at 6:08
$begingroup$
@Blue see here for this case : cut-the-knot.org/Curriculum/Geometry/Poncelet3E.shtml
$endgroup$
– math enthusiastic
Jan 17 at 6:08
$begingroup$
@RicardoBuring you mean this theorem can be true for meeting circles with specific equation not all of them? I just try it for two arbitrary circles
$endgroup$
– math enthusiastic
Jan 17 at 6:08
$begingroup$
@RicardoBuring you mean this theorem can be true for meeting circles with specific equation not all of them? I just try it for two arbitrary circles
$endgroup$
– math enthusiastic
Jan 17 at 6:08
$begingroup$
@mathenthusiastic: I had a feeling the excircle result was known. :) As to your question to Ricardo: Note that Poncelet says "If a path closes for one starting point, then it closes for any starting point." Poncelet does not guarantee a closing path for arbitrary circles.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Jan 17 at 6:13
$begingroup$
@mathenthusiastic: I had a feeling the excircle result was known. :) As to your question to Ricardo: Note that Poncelet says "If a path closes for one starting point, then it closes for any starting point." Poncelet does not guarantee a closing path for arbitrary circles.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Jan 17 at 6:13
|
show 1 more comment
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075910%2fponcelet-porism-for-two-intersecting-circles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3075910%2fponcelet-porism-for-two-intersecting-circles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I would like to see what happens if one goes through the proof in my bachelor's thesis: An explicit algebro-geometric proof of Poncelet's closure theorem. What are the equations of your circles?
$endgroup$
– Ricardo Buring
Jan 16 at 21:33
$begingroup$
Take the simplest case: a triangle. Specifically, consider $triangle ABC$, its circumcircle, and one of its excircles (say, the one opposite $A$). Let $A^prime$ be a point on the circumcircle (but outside the excircle), and let the tangents through $A$ to the excircle meet the circumcircle at $B^prime$ and $C^prime$. A GeoGebra sketch suggests (though I have not yet formally proven) that $overline{B^prime C^prime}$ is also tangent to the excircle, which (if true) validates the "intersecting Poncelet" notion for triangles.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Jan 17 at 6:01
$begingroup$
@Blue see here for this case : cut-the-knot.org/Curriculum/Geometry/Poncelet3E.shtml
$endgroup$
– math enthusiastic
Jan 17 at 6:08
$begingroup$
@RicardoBuring you mean this theorem can be true for meeting circles with specific equation not all of them? I just try it for two arbitrary circles
$endgroup$
– math enthusiastic
Jan 17 at 6:08
$begingroup$
@mathenthusiastic: I had a feeling the excircle result was known. :) As to your question to Ricardo: Note that Poncelet says "If a path closes for one starting point, then it closes for any starting point." Poncelet does not guarantee a closing path for arbitrary circles.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Jan 17 at 6:13