Proving Finite Speed of Propagation using Energy Methods












2












$begingroup$


So I'm working through a problem where I am trying to show that the wave equation in one dimension has a finite speed of propagation. Assuming that the initial data, $u(x,0)$ and $u_t(x,0)$ are supported in $(-R,R)$ form some $R>0$, by showing that the energy after some time $t$ outside of the domain $|x|<R+t$ is zero, i.e.



$$frac{1}{2}int_{|x|>R+t}u_x^2+u_t^2dx=0.$$



I am trying to show that it is non-increasing on this domain.
Now, attempting to differentiate this with respect to time I got



$$int_{|x|>R+t}u_xu_{xt}+u_tu_{tt}dx-[u_x^2(-R-t,t)+u_t^2(-R-t,t)]-[u_x^2(R+t,t)+u_t^2(R+t,t)].$$



Using the wave equation we can write that this is equal to



$$int_{|x|>R+t}u_xu_{xt}+u_tu_{xx}dx-[u_x^2(-R-t,t)+u_t^2(-R-t,t)]-[u_x^2(R+t,t)+u_t^2(R+t,t)].$$



Using integration by parts on the integral, I then get



$$u_t(-R-t,t)u_x(-R-t,t)-u_t(R+t,t)u_x(R+t,t)-[u_x^2(-R-t,t)+u_t^2(-R-t,t)]-[u_x^2(R+t,t)+u_t^2(R+t,t)].$$



A few questions:




  1. I don't know if what I did with integration by parts is true as the terminals of the integrals are functions of t, not constants which I am used to. Do boundary terms come out of integration by parts?


  2. How do I proceed in showing that this quantity is non-positive?











share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    So I'm working through a problem where I am trying to show that the wave equation in one dimension has a finite speed of propagation. Assuming that the initial data, $u(x,0)$ and $u_t(x,0)$ are supported in $(-R,R)$ form some $R>0$, by showing that the energy after some time $t$ outside of the domain $|x|<R+t$ is zero, i.e.



    $$frac{1}{2}int_{|x|>R+t}u_x^2+u_t^2dx=0.$$



    I am trying to show that it is non-increasing on this domain.
    Now, attempting to differentiate this with respect to time I got



    $$int_{|x|>R+t}u_xu_{xt}+u_tu_{tt}dx-[u_x^2(-R-t,t)+u_t^2(-R-t,t)]-[u_x^2(R+t,t)+u_t^2(R+t,t)].$$



    Using the wave equation we can write that this is equal to



    $$int_{|x|>R+t}u_xu_{xt}+u_tu_{xx}dx-[u_x^2(-R-t,t)+u_t^2(-R-t,t)]-[u_x^2(R+t,t)+u_t^2(R+t,t)].$$



    Using integration by parts on the integral, I then get



    $$u_t(-R-t,t)u_x(-R-t,t)-u_t(R+t,t)u_x(R+t,t)-[u_x^2(-R-t,t)+u_t^2(-R-t,t)]-[u_x^2(R+t,t)+u_t^2(R+t,t)].$$



    A few questions:




    1. I don't know if what I did with integration by parts is true as the terminals of the integrals are functions of t, not constants which I am used to. Do boundary terms come out of integration by parts?


    2. How do I proceed in showing that this quantity is non-positive?











    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      So I'm working through a problem where I am trying to show that the wave equation in one dimension has a finite speed of propagation. Assuming that the initial data, $u(x,0)$ and $u_t(x,0)$ are supported in $(-R,R)$ form some $R>0$, by showing that the energy after some time $t$ outside of the domain $|x|<R+t$ is zero, i.e.



      $$frac{1}{2}int_{|x|>R+t}u_x^2+u_t^2dx=0.$$



      I am trying to show that it is non-increasing on this domain.
      Now, attempting to differentiate this with respect to time I got



      $$int_{|x|>R+t}u_xu_{xt}+u_tu_{tt}dx-[u_x^2(-R-t,t)+u_t^2(-R-t,t)]-[u_x^2(R+t,t)+u_t^2(R+t,t)].$$



      Using the wave equation we can write that this is equal to



      $$int_{|x|>R+t}u_xu_{xt}+u_tu_{xx}dx-[u_x^2(-R-t,t)+u_t^2(-R-t,t)]-[u_x^2(R+t,t)+u_t^2(R+t,t)].$$



      Using integration by parts on the integral, I then get



      $$u_t(-R-t,t)u_x(-R-t,t)-u_t(R+t,t)u_x(R+t,t)-[u_x^2(-R-t,t)+u_t^2(-R-t,t)]-[u_x^2(R+t,t)+u_t^2(R+t,t)].$$



      A few questions:




      1. I don't know if what I did with integration by parts is true as the terminals of the integrals are functions of t, not constants which I am used to. Do boundary terms come out of integration by parts?


      2. How do I proceed in showing that this quantity is non-positive?











      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      So I'm working through a problem where I am trying to show that the wave equation in one dimension has a finite speed of propagation. Assuming that the initial data, $u(x,0)$ and $u_t(x,0)$ are supported in $(-R,R)$ form some $R>0$, by showing that the energy after some time $t$ outside of the domain $|x|<R+t$ is zero, i.e.



      $$frac{1}{2}int_{|x|>R+t}u_x^2+u_t^2dx=0.$$



      I am trying to show that it is non-increasing on this domain.
      Now, attempting to differentiate this with respect to time I got



      $$int_{|x|>R+t}u_xu_{xt}+u_tu_{tt}dx-[u_x^2(-R-t,t)+u_t^2(-R-t,t)]-[u_x^2(R+t,t)+u_t^2(R+t,t)].$$



      Using the wave equation we can write that this is equal to



      $$int_{|x|>R+t}u_xu_{xt}+u_tu_{xx}dx-[u_x^2(-R-t,t)+u_t^2(-R-t,t)]-[u_x^2(R+t,t)+u_t^2(R+t,t)].$$



      Using integration by parts on the integral, I then get



      $$u_t(-R-t,t)u_x(-R-t,t)-u_t(R+t,t)u_x(R+t,t)-[u_x^2(-R-t,t)+u_t^2(-R-t,t)]-[u_x^2(R+t,t)+u_t^2(R+t,t)].$$



      A few questions:




      1. I don't know if what I did with integration by parts is true as the terminals of the integrals are functions of t, not constants which I am used to. Do boundary terms come out of integration by parts?


      2. How do I proceed in showing that this quantity is non-positive?








      wave-equation hyperbolic-equations






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 10 at 4:33









      Anthony SalibAnthony Salib

      232




      232






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068242%2fproving-finite-speed-of-propagation-using-energy-methods%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068242%2fproving-finite-speed-of-propagation-using-energy-methods%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Mario Kart Wii

          Understanding the size os this class of aleatory events

          Partial Derivative Guidance.