Open Mapping Theorem from $C^n$ to $C^n$












2












$begingroup$


I am looking for an Open Mapping Theorem for a holomorphic function $f: U subset mathbb{C}^n to mathbb{C}^n$ where $U$ is a domain. I believe the following is true:




Let $f: U subset mathbb{C}^n to mathbb{C}^n$ be holomorphic, where $U$ is a domain. Suppose the determinant of the Jacobian of $f$ is not identically zero on $U$. Then $f(U)$ is open.




References and thoughts are welcome.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @user251257 I'm not sure - I would definitely agree with you if we instead assumed the determinant of the Jacobian is nonvanishing
    $endgroup$
    – wellfedgremlin
    Feb 19 '16 at 9:56












  • $begingroup$
    ah, I misunderstood your statement
    $endgroup$
    – user251257
    Feb 19 '16 at 9:58
















2












$begingroup$


I am looking for an Open Mapping Theorem for a holomorphic function $f: U subset mathbb{C}^n to mathbb{C}^n$ where $U$ is a domain. I believe the following is true:




Let $f: U subset mathbb{C}^n to mathbb{C}^n$ be holomorphic, where $U$ is a domain. Suppose the determinant of the Jacobian of $f$ is not identically zero on $U$. Then $f(U)$ is open.




References and thoughts are welcome.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @user251257 I'm not sure - I would definitely agree with you if we instead assumed the determinant of the Jacobian is nonvanishing
    $endgroup$
    – wellfedgremlin
    Feb 19 '16 at 9:56












  • $begingroup$
    ah, I misunderstood your statement
    $endgroup$
    – user251257
    Feb 19 '16 at 9:58














2












2








2


3



$begingroup$


I am looking for an Open Mapping Theorem for a holomorphic function $f: U subset mathbb{C}^n to mathbb{C}^n$ where $U$ is a domain. I believe the following is true:




Let $f: U subset mathbb{C}^n to mathbb{C}^n$ be holomorphic, where $U$ is a domain. Suppose the determinant of the Jacobian of $f$ is not identically zero on $U$. Then $f(U)$ is open.




References and thoughts are welcome.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am looking for an Open Mapping Theorem for a holomorphic function $f: U subset mathbb{C}^n to mathbb{C}^n$ where $U$ is a domain. I believe the following is true:




Let $f: U subset mathbb{C}^n to mathbb{C}^n$ be holomorphic, where $U$ is a domain. Suppose the determinant of the Jacobian of $f$ is not identically zero on $U$. Then $f(U)$ is open.




References and thoughts are welcome.







differential-geometry several-complex-variables






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 19 '16 at 10:01







wellfedgremlin

















asked Feb 19 '16 at 9:32









wellfedgremlinwellfedgremlin

382119




382119












  • $begingroup$
    @user251257 I'm not sure - I would definitely agree with you if we instead assumed the determinant of the Jacobian is nonvanishing
    $endgroup$
    – wellfedgremlin
    Feb 19 '16 at 9:56












  • $begingroup$
    ah, I misunderstood your statement
    $endgroup$
    – user251257
    Feb 19 '16 at 9:58


















  • $begingroup$
    @user251257 I'm not sure - I would definitely agree with you if we instead assumed the determinant of the Jacobian is nonvanishing
    $endgroup$
    – wellfedgremlin
    Feb 19 '16 at 9:56












  • $begingroup$
    ah, I misunderstood your statement
    $endgroup$
    – user251257
    Feb 19 '16 at 9:58
















$begingroup$
@user251257 I'm not sure - I would definitely agree with you if we instead assumed the determinant of the Jacobian is nonvanishing
$endgroup$
– wellfedgremlin
Feb 19 '16 at 9:56






$begingroup$
@user251257 I'm not sure - I would definitely agree with you if we instead assumed the determinant of the Jacobian is nonvanishing
$endgroup$
– wellfedgremlin
Feb 19 '16 at 9:56














$begingroup$
ah, I misunderstood your statement
$endgroup$
– user251257
Feb 19 '16 at 9:58




$begingroup$
ah, I misunderstood your statement
$endgroup$
– user251257
Feb 19 '16 at 9:58










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Not true: $(x,y)mapsto(x, xy)$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    The map provided is an open map. This is not a counterexample.
    $endgroup$
    – wellfedgremlin
    Feb 19 '16 at 17:46












  • $begingroup$
    Denote the given map by $f$. I show it is not open at $(0,0)$. Let $r_1<1$. I show that for any $r_2>0$, there exists $z,win B_{r_2}(0)$ such that $(z,w)notin f(B_{r_1}(0)times B_{r_1}(0))$. Indeed, choose $z=r_2r_1, w=r_2$, then the only solution is $x=r_2r_1, y=1/r_1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Bananach
    Feb 26 '16 at 7:19













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1662690%2fopen-mapping-theorem-from-cn-to-cn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

Not true: $(x,y)mapsto(x, xy)$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    The map provided is an open map. This is not a counterexample.
    $endgroup$
    – wellfedgremlin
    Feb 19 '16 at 17:46












  • $begingroup$
    Denote the given map by $f$. I show it is not open at $(0,0)$. Let $r_1<1$. I show that for any $r_2>0$, there exists $z,win B_{r_2}(0)$ such that $(z,w)notin f(B_{r_1}(0)times B_{r_1}(0))$. Indeed, choose $z=r_2r_1, w=r_2$, then the only solution is $x=r_2r_1, y=1/r_1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Bananach
    Feb 26 '16 at 7:19


















0












$begingroup$

Not true: $(x,y)mapsto(x, xy)$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    The map provided is an open map. This is not a counterexample.
    $endgroup$
    – wellfedgremlin
    Feb 19 '16 at 17:46












  • $begingroup$
    Denote the given map by $f$. I show it is not open at $(0,0)$. Let $r_1<1$. I show that for any $r_2>0$, there exists $z,win B_{r_2}(0)$ such that $(z,w)notin f(B_{r_1}(0)times B_{r_1}(0))$. Indeed, choose $z=r_2r_1, w=r_2$, then the only solution is $x=r_2r_1, y=1/r_1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Bananach
    Feb 26 '16 at 7:19
















0












0








0





$begingroup$

Not true: $(x,y)mapsto(x, xy)$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Not true: $(x,y)mapsto(x, xy)$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Feb 19 '16 at 11:07









Daniel Fischer

173k16163285




173k16163285










answered Feb 19 '16 at 10:48









user312865user312865

1451




1451












  • $begingroup$
    The map provided is an open map. This is not a counterexample.
    $endgroup$
    – wellfedgremlin
    Feb 19 '16 at 17:46












  • $begingroup$
    Denote the given map by $f$. I show it is not open at $(0,0)$. Let $r_1<1$. I show that for any $r_2>0$, there exists $z,win B_{r_2}(0)$ such that $(z,w)notin f(B_{r_1}(0)times B_{r_1}(0))$. Indeed, choose $z=r_2r_1, w=r_2$, then the only solution is $x=r_2r_1, y=1/r_1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Bananach
    Feb 26 '16 at 7:19




















  • $begingroup$
    The map provided is an open map. This is not a counterexample.
    $endgroup$
    – wellfedgremlin
    Feb 19 '16 at 17:46












  • $begingroup$
    Denote the given map by $f$. I show it is not open at $(0,0)$. Let $r_1<1$. I show that for any $r_2>0$, there exists $z,win B_{r_2}(0)$ such that $(z,w)notin f(B_{r_1}(0)times B_{r_1}(0))$. Indeed, choose $z=r_2r_1, w=r_2$, then the only solution is $x=r_2r_1, y=1/r_1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Bananach
    Feb 26 '16 at 7:19


















$begingroup$
The map provided is an open map. This is not a counterexample.
$endgroup$
– wellfedgremlin
Feb 19 '16 at 17:46






$begingroup$
The map provided is an open map. This is not a counterexample.
$endgroup$
– wellfedgremlin
Feb 19 '16 at 17:46














$begingroup$
Denote the given map by $f$. I show it is not open at $(0,0)$. Let $r_1<1$. I show that for any $r_2>0$, there exists $z,win B_{r_2}(0)$ such that $(z,w)notin f(B_{r_1}(0)times B_{r_1}(0))$. Indeed, choose $z=r_2r_1, w=r_2$, then the only solution is $x=r_2r_1, y=1/r_1$.
$endgroup$
– Bananach
Feb 26 '16 at 7:19






$begingroup$
Denote the given map by $f$. I show it is not open at $(0,0)$. Let $r_1<1$. I show that for any $r_2>0$, there exists $z,win B_{r_2}(0)$ such that $(z,w)notin f(B_{r_1}(0)times B_{r_1}(0))$. Indeed, choose $z=r_2r_1, w=r_2$, then the only solution is $x=r_2r_1, y=1/r_1$.
$endgroup$
– Bananach
Feb 26 '16 at 7:19




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1662690%2fopen-mapping-theorem-from-cn-to-cn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

Antonio Litta Visconti Arese