Determining distance between two distances given acceleration, max velocity, deceleration and total time.












1












$begingroup$


PROBLEM: A train accelerates from rest at one train station with $a= 0.72t$ $m/s^2$, until it reaches its maximum speed of $18 m/s$. Its deceleration heading into the next train station is $3.0 m/s^2$. If the journey between the two stations takes 6 minutes and 20 seconds, what is the distance between the stations?



WORKED ANSWER: I initially drew a $v-t$ graph, with maximum velocity of $18 m/s$ and maximum time of $380$ seconds. So the graph looks like a triangle with a peak of $18$. One edge of the triangle has a slope of $0.72t$ and the other edge has a slope of $-3$. So, the triangle is halved at time $t_1$ which I presumed is unknown.



PERSONAL QUESTION 1/2: According to the problem given, did I draw the graph correctly in order for me to answer the question?



WORKED ANSWER continued:



For $t le t_1$ $v=0.36t^2$:



$18 = 0.36t_1^2$



$t_1=5sqrt2$



$therefore$ $Delta x=A_1+A_2$



$=(1/2*5sqrt2*18)+(1/2*18*(380-5sqrt2))$
$=3420m$



PERSONAL QUESTION 2/2: If the graph I have drawn is correct, is my procedure correct and hence is my answer correct?






calculus arithmetic-dynamics







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You have not shown the graph. Yes, $t_1=5sqrt2$, and the graph is a parabola from $0to5sqrt2$, having the equation $v=0.36t^2$. This means the portion of the graph for $tle t_1$ is not a straight line, and your $A_1$ term is erroneous. $$A_1=int_0^{5sqrt2}0.36t^2dt$$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 10 at 7:28












  • $begingroup$
    @ShubhamJohri, so does $A_1+$$A_2=$$Delta x$ still apply but I just made a mistake for $A_1$, but $A_2$ is correct?
    $endgroup$
    – KPC2
    Jan 10 at 7:33












  • $begingroup$
    I believe the $t$ in $a=0.72t$ is in minutes
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 10 at 7:41










  • $begingroup$
    Since the second part involves constant acceleration, your $A_2$ is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 10 at 7:47










  • $begingroup$
    @KM101 So is $A_1 = integral$ correct? Wondering since I'm unsure.
    $endgroup$
    – KPC2
    Jan 10 at 7:54
















1












$begingroup$


PROBLEM: A train accelerates from rest at one train station with $a= 0.72t$ $m/s^2$, until it reaches its maximum speed of $18 m/s$. Its deceleration heading into the next train station is $3.0 m/s^2$. If the journey between the two stations takes 6 minutes and 20 seconds, what is the distance between the stations?



WORKED ANSWER: I initially drew a $v-t$ graph, with maximum velocity of $18 m/s$ and maximum time of $380$ seconds. So the graph looks like a triangle with a peak of $18$. One edge of the triangle has a slope of $0.72t$ and the other edge has a slope of $-3$. So, the triangle is halved at time $t_1$ which I presumed is unknown.



PERSONAL QUESTION 1/2: According to the problem given, did I draw the graph correctly in order for me to answer the question?



WORKED ANSWER continued:



For $t le t_1$ $v=0.36t^2$:



$18 = 0.36t_1^2$



$t_1=5sqrt2$



$therefore$ $Delta x=A_1+A_2$



$=(1/2*5sqrt2*18)+(1/2*18*(380-5sqrt2))$
$=3420m$



PERSONAL QUESTION 2/2: If the graph I have drawn is correct, is my procedure correct and hence is my answer correct?






calculus arithmetic-dynamics







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You have not shown the graph. Yes, $t_1=5sqrt2$, and the graph is a parabola from $0to5sqrt2$, having the equation $v=0.36t^2$. This means the portion of the graph for $tle t_1$ is not a straight line, and your $A_1$ term is erroneous. $$A_1=int_0^{5sqrt2}0.36t^2dt$$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 10 at 7:28












  • $begingroup$
    @ShubhamJohri, so does $A_1+$$A_2=$$Delta x$ still apply but I just made a mistake for $A_1$, but $A_2$ is correct?
    $endgroup$
    – KPC2
    Jan 10 at 7:33












  • $begingroup$
    I believe the $t$ in $a=0.72t$ is in minutes
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 10 at 7:41










  • $begingroup$
    Since the second part involves constant acceleration, your $A_2$ is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 10 at 7:47










  • $begingroup$
    @KM101 So is $A_1 = integral$ correct? Wondering since I'm unsure.
    $endgroup$
    – KPC2
    Jan 10 at 7:54














1












1








1





$begingroup$


PROBLEM: A train accelerates from rest at one train station with $a= 0.72t$ $m/s^2$, until it reaches its maximum speed of $18 m/s$. Its deceleration heading into the next train station is $3.0 m/s^2$. If the journey between the two stations takes 6 minutes and 20 seconds, what is the distance between the stations?



WORKED ANSWER: I initially drew a $v-t$ graph, with maximum velocity of $18 m/s$ and maximum time of $380$ seconds. So the graph looks like a triangle with a peak of $18$. One edge of the triangle has a slope of $0.72t$ and the other edge has a slope of $-3$. So, the triangle is halved at time $t_1$ which I presumed is unknown.



PERSONAL QUESTION 1/2: According to the problem given, did I draw the graph correctly in order for me to answer the question?



WORKED ANSWER continued:



For $t le t_1$ $v=0.36t^2$:



$18 = 0.36t_1^2$



$t_1=5sqrt2$



$therefore$ $Delta x=A_1+A_2$



$=(1/2*5sqrt2*18)+(1/2*18*(380-5sqrt2))$
$=3420m$



PERSONAL QUESTION 2/2: If the graph I have drawn is correct, is my procedure correct and hence is my answer correct?






calculus arithmetic-dynamics







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




PROBLEM: A train accelerates from rest at one train station with $a= 0.72t$ $m/s^2$, until it reaches its maximum speed of $18 m/s$. Its deceleration heading into the next train station is $3.0 m/s^2$. If the journey between the two stations takes 6 minutes and 20 seconds, what is the distance between the stations?



WORKED ANSWER: I initially drew a $v-t$ graph, with maximum velocity of $18 m/s$ and maximum time of $380$ seconds. So the graph looks like a triangle with a peak of $18$. One edge of the triangle has a slope of $0.72t$ and the other edge has a slope of $-3$. So, the triangle is halved at time $t_1$ which I presumed is unknown.



PERSONAL QUESTION 1/2: According to the problem given, did I draw the graph correctly in order for me to answer the question?



WORKED ANSWER continued:



For $t le t_1$ $v=0.36t^2$:



$18 = 0.36t_1^2$



$t_1=5sqrt2$



$therefore$ $Delta x=A_1+A_2$



$=(1/2*5sqrt2*18)+(1/2*18*(380-5sqrt2))$
$=3420m$



PERSONAL QUESTION 2/2: If the graph I have drawn is correct, is my procedure correct and hence is my answer correct?






calculus arithmetic-dynamics




calculus arithmetic-dynamics






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 10 at 7:01









KPC2KPC2

184




184












  • $begingroup$
    You have not shown the graph. Yes, $t_1=5sqrt2$, and the graph is a parabola from $0to5sqrt2$, having the equation $v=0.36t^2$. This means the portion of the graph for $tle t_1$ is not a straight line, and your $A_1$ term is erroneous. $$A_1=int_0^{5sqrt2}0.36t^2dt$$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 10 at 7:28












  • $begingroup$
    @ShubhamJohri, so does $A_1+$$A_2=$$Delta x$ still apply but I just made a mistake for $A_1$, but $A_2$ is correct?
    $endgroup$
    – KPC2
    Jan 10 at 7:33












  • $begingroup$
    I believe the $t$ in $a=0.72t$ is in minutes
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 10 at 7:41










  • $begingroup$
    Since the second part involves constant acceleration, your $A_2$ is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 10 at 7:47










  • $begingroup$
    @KM101 So is $A_1 = integral$ correct? Wondering since I'm unsure.
    $endgroup$
    – KPC2
    Jan 10 at 7:54


















  • $begingroup$
    You have not shown the graph. Yes, $t_1=5sqrt2$, and the graph is a parabola from $0to5sqrt2$, having the equation $v=0.36t^2$. This means the portion of the graph for $tle t_1$ is not a straight line, and your $A_1$ term is erroneous. $$A_1=int_0^{5sqrt2}0.36t^2dt$$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 10 at 7:28












  • $begingroup$
    @ShubhamJohri, so does $A_1+$$A_2=$$Delta x$ still apply but I just made a mistake for $A_1$, but $A_2$ is correct?
    $endgroup$
    – KPC2
    Jan 10 at 7:33












  • $begingroup$
    I believe the $t$ in $a=0.72t$ is in minutes
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 10 at 7:41










  • $begingroup$
    Since the second part involves constant acceleration, your $A_2$ is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 10 at 7:47










  • $begingroup$
    @KM101 So is $A_1 = integral$ correct? Wondering since I'm unsure.
    $endgroup$
    – KPC2
    Jan 10 at 7:54
















$begingroup$
You have not shown the graph. Yes, $t_1=5sqrt2$, and the graph is a parabola from $0to5sqrt2$, having the equation $v=0.36t^2$. This means the portion of the graph for $tle t_1$ is not a straight line, and your $A_1$ term is erroneous. $$A_1=int_0^{5sqrt2}0.36t^2dt$$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 10 at 7:28






$begingroup$
You have not shown the graph. Yes, $t_1=5sqrt2$, and the graph is a parabola from $0to5sqrt2$, having the equation $v=0.36t^2$. This means the portion of the graph for $tle t_1$ is not a straight line, and your $A_1$ term is erroneous. $$A_1=int_0^{5sqrt2}0.36t^2dt$$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 10 at 7:28














$begingroup$
@ShubhamJohri, so does $A_1+$$A_2=$$Delta x$ still apply but I just made a mistake for $A_1$, but $A_2$ is correct?
$endgroup$
– KPC2
Jan 10 at 7:33






$begingroup$
@ShubhamJohri, so does $A_1+$$A_2=$$Delta x$ still apply but I just made a mistake for $A_1$, but $A_2$ is correct?
$endgroup$
– KPC2
Jan 10 at 7:33














$begingroup$
I believe the $t$ in $a=0.72t$ is in minutes
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 10 at 7:41




$begingroup$
I believe the $t$ in $a=0.72t$ is in minutes
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 10 at 7:41












$begingroup$
Since the second part involves constant acceleration, your $A_2$ is correct.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Jan 10 at 7:47




$begingroup$
Since the second part involves constant acceleration, your $A_2$ is correct.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Jan 10 at 7:47












$begingroup$
@KM101 So is $A_1 = integral$ correct? Wondering since I'm unsure.
$endgroup$
– KPC2
Jan 10 at 7:54




$begingroup$
@KM101 So is $A_1 = integral$ correct? Wondering since I'm unsure.
$endgroup$
– KPC2
Jan 10 at 7:54










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Your graph for the first part isn’t correct. The integral of a linear function gives a parabola.



Just like how uniformly increasing velocity (constant acceleration) produces a parabolic $x-t$ (position-time) graph. For $a = 0.72t$, $j = 0.72$. $j$ represents “jerk” (rate of change of acceleration).



Hence, $$Delta x = frac{1}{6}jt^3+frac{1}{2}a_0t^2+v_0t = frac{1}{6}(0.72)left(5sqrt{2}right)^3 = 30sqrt{2}$$



(Since the object starts from rest, the terms involving $a_0$ and $v_0$ become $0$.) The formula above can be derived via repeated integration.



You can also use integration, which is also viable:



$$v(t) = int a(t)dt = int 0.72t = frac{1}{2}0.72t^2 = 0.36t^2$$



You have $t_0 = 0$ and $t_1 = 5sqrt{2}$, so



$$Delta x = int_{0}^{5sqrt{2}}0.36t^2 = frac{1}{3}(0.36)left(5sqrt{2}right)^3 = 30sqrt{2}$$



The rest of your answer is correct because there is constant acceleration, producing a triangular $v-t$ graph.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    The acceleration is $0.72t$, not $0.72$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 10 at 7:25










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for pointing out, I’ve edited the answer accordingly.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 10 at 7:43










  • $begingroup$
    Is this $Delta x$ for $A_1$?
    $endgroup$
    – KPC2
    Jan 10 at 7:56










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, your $A_2$ is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 10 at 7:56










  • $begingroup$
    Also, sorry for the repetitive editing, I didn’t initially read the question correctly.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 10 at 8:01











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068329%2fdetermining-distance-between-two-distances-given-acceleration-max-velocity-dec%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

Your graph for the first part isn’t correct. The integral of a linear function gives a parabola.



Just like how uniformly increasing velocity (constant acceleration) produces a parabolic $x-t$ (position-time) graph. For $a = 0.72t$, $j = 0.72$. $j$ represents “jerk” (rate of change of acceleration).



Hence, $$Delta x = frac{1}{6}jt^3+frac{1}{2}a_0t^2+v_0t = frac{1}{6}(0.72)left(5sqrt{2}right)^3 = 30sqrt{2}$$



(Since the object starts from rest, the terms involving $a_0$ and $v_0$ become $0$.) The formula above can be derived via repeated integration.



You can also use integration, which is also viable:



$$v(t) = int a(t)dt = int 0.72t = frac{1}{2}0.72t^2 = 0.36t^2$$



You have $t_0 = 0$ and $t_1 = 5sqrt{2}$, so



$$Delta x = int_{0}^{5sqrt{2}}0.36t^2 = frac{1}{3}(0.36)left(5sqrt{2}right)^3 = 30sqrt{2}$$



The rest of your answer is correct because there is constant acceleration, producing a triangular $v-t$ graph.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    The acceleration is $0.72t$, not $0.72$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 10 at 7:25










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for pointing out, I’ve edited the answer accordingly.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 10 at 7:43










  • $begingroup$
    Is this $Delta x$ for $A_1$?
    $endgroup$
    – KPC2
    Jan 10 at 7:56










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, your $A_2$ is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 10 at 7:56










  • $begingroup$
    Also, sorry for the repetitive editing, I didn’t initially read the question correctly.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 10 at 8:01
















0












$begingroup$

Your graph for the first part isn’t correct. The integral of a linear function gives a parabola.



Just like how uniformly increasing velocity (constant acceleration) produces a parabolic $x-t$ (position-time) graph. For $a = 0.72t$, $j = 0.72$. $j$ represents “jerk” (rate of change of acceleration).



Hence, $$Delta x = frac{1}{6}jt^3+frac{1}{2}a_0t^2+v_0t = frac{1}{6}(0.72)left(5sqrt{2}right)^3 = 30sqrt{2}$$



(Since the object starts from rest, the terms involving $a_0$ and $v_0$ become $0$.) The formula above can be derived via repeated integration.



You can also use integration, which is also viable:



$$v(t) = int a(t)dt = int 0.72t = frac{1}{2}0.72t^2 = 0.36t^2$$



You have $t_0 = 0$ and $t_1 = 5sqrt{2}$, so



$$Delta x = int_{0}^{5sqrt{2}}0.36t^2 = frac{1}{3}(0.36)left(5sqrt{2}right)^3 = 30sqrt{2}$$



The rest of your answer is correct because there is constant acceleration, producing a triangular $v-t$ graph.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    The acceleration is $0.72t$, not $0.72$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 10 at 7:25










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for pointing out, I’ve edited the answer accordingly.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 10 at 7:43










  • $begingroup$
    Is this $Delta x$ for $A_1$?
    $endgroup$
    – KPC2
    Jan 10 at 7:56










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, your $A_2$ is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 10 at 7:56










  • $begingroup$
    Also, sorry for the repetitive editing, I didn’t initially read the question correctly.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 10 at 8:01














0












0








0





$begingroup$

Your graph for the first part isn’t correct. The integral of a linear function gives a parabola.



Just like how uniformly increasing velocity (constant acceleration) produces a parabolic $x-t$ (position-time) graph. For $a = 0.72t$, $j = 0.72$. $j$ represents “jerk” (rate of change of acceleration).



Hence, $$Delta x = frac{1}{6}jt^3+frac{1}{2}a_0t^2+v_0t = frac{1}{6}(0.72)left(5sqrt{2}right)^3 = 30sqrt{2}$$



(Since the object starts from rest, the terms involving $a_0$ and $v_0$ become $0$.) The formula above can be derived via repeated integration.



You can also use integration, which is also viable:



$$v(t) = int a(t)dt = int 0.72t = frac{1}{2}0.72t^2 = 0.36t^2$$



You have $t_0 = 0$ and $t_1 = 5sqrt{2}$, so



$$Delta x = int_{0}^{5sqrt{2}}0.36t^2 = frac{1}{3}(0.36)left(5sqrt{2}right)^3 = 30sqrt{2}$$



The rest of your answer is correct because there is constant acceleration, producing a triangular $v-t$ graph.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Your graph for the first part isn’t correct. The integral of a linear function gives a parabola.



Just like how uniformly increasing velocity (constant acceleration) produces a parabolic $x-t$ (position-time) graph. For $a = 0.72t$, $j = 0.72$. $j$ represents “jerk” (rate of change of acceleration).



Hence, $$Delta x = frac{1}{6}jt^3+frac{1}{2}a_0t^2+v_0t = frac{1}{6}(0.72)left(5sqrt{2}right)^3 = 30sqrt{2}$$



(Since the object starts from rest, the terms involving $a_0$ and $v_0$ become $0$.) The formula above can be derived via repeated integration.



You can also use integration, which is also viable:



$$v(t) = int a(t)dt = int 0.72t = frac{1}{2}0.72t^2 = 0.36t^2$$



You have $t_0 = 0$ and $t_1 = 5sqrt{2}$, so



$$Delta x = int_{0}^{5sqrt{2}}0.36t^2 = frac{1}{3}(0.36)left(5sqrt{2}right)^3 = 30sqrt{2}$$



The rest of your answer is correct because there is constant acceleration, producing a triangular $v-t$ graph.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 10 at 8:13

























answered Jan 10 at 7:20









KM101KM101

5,9131523




5,9131523












  • $begingroup$
    The acceleration is $0.72t$, not $0.72$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 10 at 7:25










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for pointing out, I’ve edited the answer accordingly.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 10 at 7:43










  • $begingroup$
    Is this $Delta x$ for $A_1$?
    $endgroup$
    – KPC2
    Jan 10 at 7:56










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, your $A_2$ is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 10 at 7:56










  • $begingroup$
    Also, sorry for the repetitive editing, I didn’t initially read the question correctly.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 10 at 8:01


















  • $begingroup$
    The acceleration is $0.72t$, not $0.72$
    $endgroup$
    – Shubham Johri
    Jan 10 at 7:25










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for pointing out, I’ve edited the answer accordingly.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 10 at 7:43










  • $begingroup$
    Is this $Delta x$ for $A_1$?
    $endgroup$
    – KPC2
    Jan 10 at 7:56










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, your $A_2$ is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 10 at 7:56










  • $begingroup$
    Also, sorry for the repetitive editing, I didn’t initially read the question correctly.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 10 at 8:01
















$begingroup$
The acceleration is $0.72t$, not $0.72$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 10 at 7:25




$begingroup$
The acceleration is $0.72t$, not $0.72$
$endgroup$
– Shubham Johri
Jan 10 at 7:25












$begingroup$
Thanks for pointing out, I’ve edited the answer accordingly.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Jan 10 at 7:43




$begingroup$
Thanks for pointing out, I’ve edited the answer accordingly.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Jan 10 at 7:43












$begingroup$
Is this $Delta x$ for $A_1$?
$endgroup$
– KPC2
Jan 10 at 7:56




$begingroup$
Is this $Delta x$ for $A_1$?
$endgroup$
– KPC2
Jan 10 at 7:56












$begingroup$
Yes, your $A_2$ is correct.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Jan 10 at 7:56




$begingroup$
Yes, your $A_2$ is correct.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Jan 10 at 7:56












$begingroup$
Also, sorry for the repetitive editing, I didn’t initially read the question correctly.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Jan 10 at 8:01




$begingroup$
Also, sorry for the repetitive editing, I didn’t initially read the question correctly.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Jan 10 at 8:01


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068329%2fdetermining-distance-between-two-distances-given-acceleration-max-velocity-dec%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

Image
Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! Mario Kart Wii From The Cutting Room Floor Jump to: navigation, search Mario Kart Wii Developer : Nintendo Publisher : Nintendo Platform : Wii Released in JP : April 10, 2008 Released in US : April 27, 2008 Released in EU : April 11, 2008 Released in AU : April 24, 2008 Released in KR : April 30, 2009 This game has unused animations. This game has unused areas. This game has unused code. This game has unused objects. This game has unused modes / minigames. This game has unused graphics. This game has unused models. This game has unused items. This game has unused music. This game has regional differences. This game has a notes page This game has a prerelease article Mario Kart Wii is the sixth game in the series (not counting Arcade editions), which intro
Read more

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

Image
5 Does "Dominus providebit" mean "The Lord will provide" or "The Lord provides"? I once had a bit of an argument with a guy who studied Latin over that. It's an inscription that appears on the rim of some old Swiss coins that I have. meaning latin-to-english-translation grammar-identification share | improve this question edited Jan 18 at 15:27 V2Blast 105 4 asked Jan 17 at 22:49 Donald K. Donald K. 26 1
Read more

Antonio Litta Visconti Arese

Image
Antonio Litta Visconti Arese I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò In carica 1797 – 1820 Predecessore Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Successore Alfonso Litta Visconti Arese Trattamento Sua grazia Altri titoli Duca Litta Conte del Regno napoleonico d'Italia Patrizio milanese Don Nascita Milano, 2 maggio 1748 Morte Milano, 14 agosto 1820 Dinastia Litta Visconti Arese Padre Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Madre Maria Elisabetta Visconti Borromeo Consorte Barbara Barbiano di Belgioioso Religione cattolicesimo Antonio Litta Visconti Arese , I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò (Milano, 2 maggio 1748 – Milano, 14 agosto 1820), è stato un nobile e politico italiano. Composizione "Il pastore svizzero" di Pietro Morlacchi, con dedica Indice 1 Biografia 2 Onorificenze 3 Araldica 4 Albero genealogico 5 Note 6 Altri progetti Biografia | Antonio Litta Visco
Read more