Prove $R_{mathfrak p}$ has only one maximal ideal $mathfrak pR_{mathfrak p}$
$begingroup$
$mathfrak p$ is prime ideal of commtative ring $R$.
localization $R_{mathfrak p}:=(R-{mathfrak p})^{-1}R$.
We know $mathfrak pR_{mathfrak p}=(R-{mathfrak p})^{-1}mathfrak p$ is prime ideal of $R_{mathfrak p}$. Define $mathfrak q ^c:={rin R | frac r1in mathfrak q}$.
Suppose ${mathfrak q}$ is prime ideal of $R_{mathfrak p}$, if we have $color{blue}{mathfrak q ^c cap (R-{mathfrak p})=varnothing}$, then $mathfrak q^cin mathfrak p, mathfrak qin mathfrak pR_{mathfrak p}$.
So $mathfrak pR_{mathfrak p}$ is the only maximal ideal of $R_{mathfrak p}$.
So how to prove $mathfrak q ^c cap (R-{mathfrak p})=varnothing$ ? Thanks in advance.
abstract-algebra ring-theory ideals localization
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$mathfrak p$ is prime ideal of commtative ring $R$.
localization $R_{mathfrak p}:=(R-{mathfrak p})^{-1}R$.
We know $mathfrak pR_{mathfrak p}=(R-{mathfrak p})^{-1}mathfrak p$ is prime ideal of $R_{mathfrak p}$. Define $mathfrak q ^c:={rin R | frac r1in mathfrak q}$.
Suppose ${mathfrak q}$ is prime ideal of $R_{mathfrak p}$, if we have $color{blue}{mathfrak q ^c cap (R-{mathfrak p})=varnothing}$, then $mathfrak q^cin mathfrak p, mathfrak qin mathfrak pR_{mathfrak p}$.
So $mathfrak pR_{mathfrak p}$ is the only maximal ideal of $R_{mathfrak p}$.
So how to prove $mathfrak q ^c cap (R-{mathfrak p})=varnothing$ ? Thanks in advance.
abstract-algebra ring-theory ideals localization
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If not, $mathfrak{q}$ contains a unit in $R_{mathfrak{p}}$.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Jan 10 at 4:53
$begingroup$
Is it clear to you that $mathfrak pR_{mathfrak p} = R_{mathfrak p} - R_{mathfrak p}^times$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 10 at 6:16
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$mathfrak p$ is prime ideal of commtative ring $R$.
localization $R_{mathfrak p}:=(R-{mathfrak p})^{-1}R$.
We know $mathfrak pR_{mathfrak p}=(R-{mathfrak p})^{-1}mathfrak p$ is prime ideal of $R_{mathfrak p}$. Define $mathfrak q ^c:={rin R | frac r1in mathfrak q}$.
Suppose ${mathfrak q}$ is prime ideal of $R_{mathfrak p}$, if we have $color{blue}{mathfrak q ^c cap (R-{mathfrak p})=varnothing}$, then $mathfrak q^cin mathfrak p, mathfrak qin mathfrak pR_{mathfrak p}$.
So $mathfrak pR_{mathfrak p}$ is the only maximal ideal of $R_{mathfrak p}$.
So how to prove $mathfrak q ^c cap (R-{mathfrak p})=varnothing$ ? Thanks in advance.
abstract-algebra ring-theory ideals localization
$endgroup$
$mathfrak p$ is prime ideal of commtative ring $R$.
localization $R_{mathfrak p}:=(R-{mathfrak p})^{-1}R$.
We know $mathfrak pR_{mathfrak p}=(R-{mathfrak p})^{-1}mathfrak p$ is prime ideal of $R_{mathfrak p}$. Define $mathfrak q ^c:={rin R | frac r1in mathfrak q}$.
Suppose ${mathfrak q}$ is prime ideal of $R_{mathfrak p}$, if we have $color{blue}{mathfrak q ^c cap (R-{mathfrak p})=varnothing}$, then $mathfrak q^cin mathfrak p, mathfrak qin mathfrak pR_{mathfrak p}$.
So $mathfrak pR_{mathfrak p}$ is the only maximal ideal of $R_{mathfrak p}$.
So how to prove $mathfrak q ^c cap (R-{mathfrak p})=varnothing$ ? Thanks in advance.
abstract-algebra ring-theory ideals localization
abstract-algebra ring-theory ideals localization
asked Jan 10 at 4:45
AndrewsAndrews
3831317
3831317
$begingroup$
If not, $mathfrak{q}$ contains a unit in $R_{mathfrak{p}}$.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Jan 10 at 4:53
$begingroup$
Is it clear to you that $mathfrak pR_{mathfrak p} = R_{mathfrak p} - R_{mathfrak p}^times$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 10 at 6:16
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If not, $mathfrak{q}$ contains a unit in $R_{mathfrak{p}}$.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Jan 10 at 4:53
$begingroup$
Is it clear to you that $mathfrak pR_{mathfrak p} = R_{mathfrak p} - R_{mathfrak p}^times$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 10 at 6:16
$begingroup$
If not, $mathfrak{q}$ contains a unit in $R_{mathfrak{p}}$.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Jan 10 at 4:53
$begingroup$
If not, $mathfrak{q}$ contains a unit in $R_{mathfrak{p}}$.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Jan 10 at 4:53
$begingroup$
Is it clear to you that $mathfrak pR_{mathfrak p} = R_{mathfrak p} - R_{mathfrak p}^times$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 10 at 6:16
$begingroup$
Is it clear to you that $mathfrak pR_{mathfrak p} = R_{mathfrak p} - R_{mathfrak p}^times$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 10 at 6:16
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
As @jgon said, if not, then $mathfrak q$ contains a unit in $R_{mathfrak p}$.
For commutative ring $R$ and multiplicative set $S$ on it, there's a bijection
{prime ideal in $R$ disjoint to $S$} $to$ {prime ideal in $S^{-1}R$}, $quad$ $mathfrak p mapsto S^{-1}mathfrak p$
The reverse map is $mathfrak q mapsto mathfrak q^c$.
And as @reuns said, if commutative ring $R$ has only one maximal ideal $mathfrak m$, then $mathfrak m =R-R^times.$
proof: if $a not in $maximal ideal $mathfrak m$, then $(a)=R$. So $exists b in R $ s.t. $ab=1, a in R^times$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The exercise asks you to prove that $mathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}$ is the only maximal ideal of $R_{mathfrak{p}}$, so starting with a prime ideal $mathfrak{q}$ is not the best way (the ring $R_{mathfrak{p}}$ can actually have other prime ideals).
Let $r/s$ be an element of $R_{mathfrak{p}}$ that's not in $mathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}$. Then $rnotinmathfrak{p}$, otherwise
$$
frac{r}{s}=frac{r}{1}frac{1}{s}inmathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}
$$
by definition. Then $s/rin R_{mathfrak{p}}$ and so $r/s$ is invertible. Therefore an ideal of $R_{mathfrak{p}}$ properly containing $mathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}$ contains a unit and so it is the whole ring.
There's however another fact to verify, namely that $mathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}ne R_{mathfrak{p}}$. This is equivalent to showing that $1/1notinmathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}$. Suppose the contrary; then
$$
frac{1}{1}=frac{r}{s}
$$
for some $rinmathfrak{p}$ and $sin R-mathfrak{p}$. This amounts to saying that there exists $tin R-mathfrak{p}$ such that $(s-r)t=0$, that is, $rt=st$ which is impossible because $rtinmathfrak{p}$ and $stnotinmathfrak{p}$, the latter due to $mathfrak{p}$ being a prime ideal and $s,tnotinmathfrak{p}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$R_P$ is a local ring, i.e. it has a unique maximal ideal of the form
$$ m_P={ frac {p}{s} ; pin P, sin R-P } $$
to see that $m_p$is maximal ideal, every element of $R_P$ not in $m_P$ is the form $frac{s'}{s}$ with $s'in R-P$, and so has an inverse $frac{s}{s'}$ and is hence a unit.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068248%2fprove-r-mathfrak-p-has-only-one-maximal-ideal-mathfrak-pr-mathfrak-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
As @jgon said, if not, then $mathfrak q$ contains a unit in $R_{mathfrak p}$.
For commutative ring $R$ and multiplicative set $S$ on it, there's a bijection
{prime ideal in $R$ disjoint to $S$} $to$ {prime ideal in $S^{-1}R$}, $quad$ $mathfrak p mapsto S^{-1}mathfrak p$
The reverse map is $mathfrak q mapsto mathfrak q^c$.
And as @reuns said, if commutative ring $R$ has only one maximal ideal $mathfrak m$, then $mathfrak m =R-R^times.$
proof: if $a not in $maximal ideal $mathfrak m$, then $(a)=R$. So $exists b in R $ s.t. $ab=1, a in R^times$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As @jgon said, if not, then $mathfrak q$ contains a unit in $R_{mathfrak p}$.
For commutative ring $R$ and multiplicative set $S$ on it, there's a bijection
{prime ideal in $R$ disjoint to $S$} $to$ {prime ideal in $S^{-1}R$}, $quad$ $mathfrak p mapsto S^{-1}mathfrak p$
The reverse map is $mathfrak q mapsto mathfrak q^c$.
And as @reuns said, if commutative ring $R$ has only one maximal ideal $mathfrak m$, then $mathfrak m =R-R^times.$
proof: if $a not in $maximal ideal $mathfrak m$, then $(a)=R$. So $exists b in R $ s.t. $ab=1, a in R^times$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As @jgon said, if not, then $mathfrak q$ contains a unit in $R_{mathfrak p}$.
For commutative ring $R$ and multiplicative set $S$ on it, there's a bijection
{prime ideal in $R$ disjoint to $S$} $to$ {prime ideal in $S^{-1}R$}, $quad$ $mathfrak p mapsto S^{-1}mathfrak p$
The reverse map is $mathfrak q mapsto mathfrak q^c$.
And as @reuns said, if commutative ring $R$ has only one maximal ideal $mathfrak m$, then $mathfrak m =R-R^times.$
proof: if $a not in $maximal ideal $mathfrak m$, then $(a)=R$. So $exists b in R $ s.t. $ab=1, a in R^times$.
$endgroup$
As @jgon said, if not, then $mathfrak q$ contains a unit in $R_{mathfrak p}$.
For commutative ring $R$ and multiplicative set $S$ on it, there's a bijection
{prime ideal in $R$ disjoint to $S$} $to$ {prime ideal in $S^{-1}R$}, $quad$ $mathfrak p mapsto S^{-1}mathfrak p$
The reverse map is $mathfrak q mapsto mathfrak q^c$.
And as @reuns said, if commutative ring $R$ has only one maximal ideal $mathfrak m$, then $mathfrak m =R-R^times.$
proof: if $a not in $maximal ideal $mathfrak m$, then $(a)=R$. So $exists b in R $ s.t. $ab=1, a in R^times$.
edited Jan 10 at 8:22
answered Jan 10 at 8:16
AndrewsAndrews
3831317
3831317
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The exercise asks you to prove that $mathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}$ is the only maximal ideal of $R_{mathfrak{p}}$, so starting with a prime ideal $mathfrak{q}$ is not the best way (the ring $R_{mathfrak{p}}$ can actually have other prime ideals).
Let $r/s$ be an element of $R_{mathfrak{p}}$ that's not in $mathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}$. Then $rnotinmathfrak{p}$, otherwise
$$
frac{r}{s}=frac{r}{1}frac{1}{s}inmathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}
$$
by definition. Then $s/rin R_{mathfrak{p}}$ and so $r/s$ is invertible. Therefore an ideal of $R_{mathfrak{p}}$ properly containing $mathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}$ contains a unit and so it is the whole ring.
There's however another fact to verify, namely that $mathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}ne R_{mathfrak{p}}$. This is equivalent to showing that $1/1notinmathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}$. Suppose the contrary; then
$$
frac{1}{1}=frac{r}{s}
$$
for some $rinmathfrak{p}$ and $sin R-mathfrak{p}$. This amounts to saying that there exists $tin R-mathfrak{p}$ such that $(s-r)t=0$, that is, $rt=st$ which is impossible because $rtinmathfrak{p}$ and $stnotinmathfrak{p}$, the latter due to $mathfrak{p}$ being a prime ideal and $s,tnotinmathfrak{p}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The exercise asks you to prove that $mathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}$ is the only maximal ideal of $R_{mathfrak{p}}$, so starting with a prime ideal $mathfrak{q}$ is not the best way (the ring $R_{mathfrak{p}}$ can actually have other prime ideals).
Let $r/s$ be an element of $R_{mathfrak{p}}$ that's not in $mathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}$. Then $rnotinmathfrak{p}$, otherwise
$$
frac{r}{s}=frac{r}{1}frac{1}{s}inmathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}
$$
by definition. Then $s/rin R_{mathfrak{p}}$ and so $r/s$ is invertible. Therefore an ideal of $R_{mathfrak{p}}$ properly containing $mathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}$ contains a unit and so it is the whole ring.
There's however another fact to verify, namely that $mathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}ne R_{mathfrak{p}}$. This is equivalent to showing that $1/1notinmathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}$. Suppose the contrary; then
$$
frac{1}{1}=frac{r}{s}
$$
for some $rinmathfrak{p}$ and $sin R-mathfrak{p}$. This amounts to saying that there exists $tin R-mathfrak{p}$ such that $(s-r)t=0$, that is, $rt=st$ which is impossible because $rtinmathfrak{p}$ and $stnotinmathfrak{p}$, the latter due to $mathfrak{p}$ being a prime ideal and $s,tnotinmathfrak{p}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The exercise asks you to prove that $mathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}$ is the only maximal ideal of $R_{mathfrak{p}}$, so starting with a prime ideal $mathfrak{q}$ is not the best way (the ring $R_{mathfrak{p}}$ can actually have other prime ideals).
Let $r/s$ be an element of $R_{mathfrak{p}}$ that's not in $mathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}$. Then $rnotinmathfrak{p}$, otherwise
$$
frac{r}{s}=frac{r}{1}frac{1}{s}inmathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}
$$
by definition. Then $s/rin R_{mathfrak{p}}$ and so $r/s$ is invertible. Therefore an ideal of $R_{mathfrak{p}}$ properly containing $mathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}$ contains a unit and so it is the whole ring.
There's however another fact to verify, namely that $mathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}ne R_{mathfrak{p}}$. This is equivalent to showing that $1/1notinmathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}$. Suppose the contrary; then
$$
frac{1}{1}=frac{r}{s}
$$
for some $rinmathfrak{p}$ and $sin R-mathfrak{p}$. This amounts to saying that there exists $tin R-mathfrak{p}$ such that $(s-r)t=0$, that is, $rt=st$ which is impossible because $rtinmathfrak{p}$ and $stnotinmathfrak{p}$, the latter due to $mathfrak{p}$ being a prime ideal and $s,tnotinmathfrak{p}$.
$endgroup$
The exercise asks you to prove that $mathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}$ is the only maximal ideal of $R_{mathfrak{p}}$, so starting with a prime ideal $mathfrak{q}$ is not the best way (the ring $R_{mathfrak{p}}$ can actually have other prime ideals).
Let $r/s$ be an element of $R_{mathfrak{p}}$ that's not in $mathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}$. Then $rnotinmathfrak{p}$, otherwise
$$
frac{r}{s}=frac{r}{1}frac{1}{s}inmathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}
$$
by definition. Then $s/rin R_{mathfrak{p}}$ and so $r/s$ is invertible. Therefore an ideal of $R_{mathfrak{p}}$ properly containing $mathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}$ contains a unit and so it is the whole ring.
There's however another fact to verify, namely that $mathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}ne R_{mathfrak{p}}$. This is equivalent to showing that $1/1notinmathfrak{p}R_{mathfrak{p}}$. Suppose the contrary; then
$$
frac{1}{1}=frac{r}{s}
$$
for some $rinmathfrak{p}$ and $sin R-mathfrak{p}$. This amounts to saying that there exists $tin R-mathfrak{p}$ such that $(s-r)t=0$, that is, $rt=st$ which is impossible because $rtinmathfrak{p}$ and $stnotinmathfrak{p}$, the latter due to $mathfrak{p}$ being a prime ideal and $s,tnotinmathfrak{p}$.
answered Jan 10 at 11:16
egregegreg
180k1485202
180k1485202
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$R_P$ is a local ring, i.e. it has a unique maximal ideal of the form
$$ m_P={ frac {p}{s} ; pin P, sin R-P } $$
to see that $m_p$is maximal ideal, every element of $R_P$ not in $m_P$ is the form $frac{s'}{s}$ with $s'in R-P$, and so has an inverse $frac{s}{s'}$ and is hence a unit.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$R_P$ is a local ring, i.e. it has a unique maximal ideal of the form
$$ m_P={ frac {p}{s} ; pin P, sin R-P } $$
to see that $m_p$is maximal ideal, every element of $R_P$ not in $m_P$ is the form $frac{s'}{s}$ with $s'in R-P$, and so has an inverse $frac{s}{s'}$ and is hence a unit.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$R_P$ is a local ring, i.e. it has a unique maximal ideal of the form
$$ m_P={ frac {p}{s} ; pin P, sin R-P } $$
to see that $m_p$is maximal ideal, every element of $R_P$ not in $m_P$ is the form $frac{s'}{s}$ with $s'in R-P$, and so has an inverse $frac{s}{s'}$ and is hence a unit.
$endgroup$
$R_P$ is a local ring, i.e. it has a unique maximal ideal of the form
$$ m_P={ frac {p}{s} ; pin P, sin R-P } $$
to see that $m_p$is maximal ideal, every element of $R_P$ not in $m_P$ is the form $frac{s'}{s}$ with $s'in R-P$, and so has an inverse $frac{s}{s'}$ and is hence a unit.
answered Jan 11 at 0:31
MustafaMustafa
1,3181311
1,3181311
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068248%2fprove-r-mathfrak-p-has-only-one-maximal-ideal-mathfrak-pr-mathfrak-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
If not, $mathfrak{q}$ contains a unit in $R_{mathfrak{p}}$.
$endgroup$
– jgon
Jan 10 at 4:53
$begingroup$
Is it clear to you that $mathfrak pR_{mathfrak p} = R_{mathfrak p} - R_{mathfrak p}^times$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 10 at 6:16