Elliptic Curve has Canonical Bundle $K_E = mathcal{O}_E$












1












$begingroup$


Let $E$ be an elliptic curve over a field $k$. I'm looking for a proof that for the canonic divisor $K_E$ we have $K_E = mathcal{O}_E$? RR says $h^0(K_E) = h^0(mathcal{O}_E)+deg(K_E) +g-1= h^0(mathcal{O}_E)=1$ since $E$ elliptic. I don't see wy this already imply $K_E = mathcal{O}_E$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Let $E$ be an elliptic curve over a field $k$. I'm looking for a proof that for the canonic divisor $K_E$ we have $K_E = mathcal{O}_E$? RR says $h^0(K_E) = h^0(mathcal{O}_E)+deg(K_E) +g-1= h^0(mathcal{O}_E)=1$ since $E$ elliptic. I don't see wy this already imply $K_E = mathcal{O}_E$.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Let $E$ be an elliptic curve over a field $k$. I'm looking for a proof that for the canonic divisor $K_E$ we have $K_E = mathcal{O}_E$? RR says $h^0(K_E) = h^0(mathcal{O}_E)+deg(K_E) +g-1= h^0(mathcal{O}_E)=1$ since $E$ elliptic. I don't see wy this already imply $K_E = mathcal{O}_E$.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $E$ be an elliptic curve over a field $k$. I'm looking for a proof that for the canonic divisor $K_E$ we have $K_E = mathcal{O}_E$? RR says $h^0(K_E) = h^0(mathcal{O}_E)+deg(K_E) +g-1= h^0(mathcal{O}_E)=1$ since $E$ elliptic. I don't see wy this already imply $K_E = mathcal{O}_E$.







      algebraic-geometry elliptic-curves






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 14 at 4:12







      KarlPeter

















      asked Jan 14 at 3:57









      KarlPeterKarlPeter

      5341315




      5341315






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Let $L(D)$ be a line bundle on a (smooth projective) curve and suppose $D$ has degree zero. If there is a global section of $L(D)$, then there is a function $f$ whose zeros and poles are exactly described by $D$ (the function must have zeros along the zeros of $D$ and thus can only have correpsonding poles along the poles of $D$.) But now division by $f$ gives an isomorphism between $L(D)$ and the trivial bundle.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072830%2felliptic-curve-has-canonical-bundle-k-e-mathcalo-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            Let $L(D)$ be a line bundle on a (smooth projective) curve and suppose $D$ has degree zero. If there is a global section of $L(D)$, then there is a function $f$ whose zeros and poles are exactly described by $D$ (the function must have zeros along the zeros of $D$ and thus can only have correpsonding poles along the poles of $D$.) But now division by $f$ gives an isomorphism between $L(D)$ and the trivial bundle.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              2












              $begingroup$

              Let $L(D)$ be a line bundle on a (smooth projective) curve and suppose $D$ has degree zero. If there is a global section of $L(D)$, then there is a function $f$ whose zeros and poles are exactly described by $D$ (the function must have zeros along the zeros of $D$ and thus can only have correpsonding poles along the poles of $D$.) But now division by $f$ gives an isomorphism between $L(D)$ and the trivial bundle.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                Let $L(D)$ be a line bundle on a (smooth projective) curve and suppose $D$ has degree zero. If there is a global section of $L(D)$, then there is a function $f$ whose zeros and poles are exactly described by $D$ (the function must have zeros along the zeros of $D$ and thus can only have correpsonding poles along the poles of $D$.) But now division by $f$ gives an isomorphism between $L(D)$ and the trivial bundle.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Let $L(D)$ be a line bundle on a (smooth projective) curve and suppose $D$ has degree zero. If there is a global section of $L(D)$, then there is a function $f$ whose zeros and poles are exactly described by $D$ (the function must have zeros along the zeros of $D$ and thus can only have correpsonding poles along the poles of $D$.) But now division by $f$ gives an isomorphism between $L(D)$ and the trivial bundle.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 14 at 4:07









                hunterhunter

                14.5k22438




                14.5k22438






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072830%2felliptic-curve-has-canonical-bundle-k-e-mathcalo-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Mario Kart Wii

                    The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

                    What does “Dominus providebit” mean?