About two functions whose Lebesgue integral on all sets of a $sigma-$algebra are equal
$begingroup$
Let $X$ be an infinite set and $mathcal{F}$ be a $sigma-$algrbra with infinite sets on $X$. Given on $X$ a measure $mu$.
Let $f$ and $g$ be two $mathcal{F}-$measurable functions. Is it necessary that if $$ int_A f dmu = int_A g dmu, forall A in mathcal{F}$$
then $f = g$ ($mu-$a.e)?
I feel that the answer for this is positive, but I can't prove the statement above nor give a counter-example. Please give me a hint. Thank you.
measure-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X$ be an infinite set and $mathcal{F}$ be a $sigma-$algrbra with infinite sets on $X$. Given on $X$ a measure $mu$.
Let $f$ and $g$ be two $mathcal{F}-$measurable functions. Is it necessary that if $$ int_A f dmu = int_A g dmu, forall A in mathcal{F}$$
then $f = g$ ($mu-$a.e)?
I feel that the answer for this is positive, but I can't prove the statement above nor give a counter-example. Please give me a hint. Thank you.
measure-theory
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I'm assuming that you mean both $f$ and $g$ are $mathcal{F}$-measurable?
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 14 at 5:32
$begingroup$
Yeah... I forgot to state it clearly. I will edit
$endgroup$
– ElementX
Jan 14 at 6:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $X$ be an infinite set and $mathcal{F}$ be a $sigma-$algrbra with infinite sets on $X$. Given on $X$ a measure $mu$.
Let $f$ and $g$ be two $mathcal{F}-$measurable functions. Is it necessary that if $$ int_A f dmu = int_A g dmu, forall A in mathcal{F}$$
then $f = g$ ($mu-$a.e)?
I feel that the answer for this is positive, but I can't prove the statement above nor give a counter-example. Please give me a hint. Thank you.
measure-theory
$endgroup$
Let $X$ be an infinite set and $mathcal{F}$ be a $sigma-$algrbra with infinite sets on $X$. Given on $X$ a measure $mu$.
Let $f$ and $g$ be two $mathcal{F}-$measurable functions. Is it necessary that if $$ int_A f dmu = int_A g dmu, forall A in mathcal{F}$$
then $f = g$ ($mu-$a.e)?
I feel that the answer for this is positive, but I can't prove the statement above nor give a counter-example. Please give me a hint. Thank you.
measure-theory
measure-theory
edited Jan 14 at 6:30
ElementX
asked Jan 14 at 4:59
ElementXElementX
389111
389111
1
$begingroup$
I'm assuming that you mean both $f$ and $g$ are $mathcal{F}$-measurable?
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 14 at 5:32
$begingroup$
Yeah... I forgot to state it clearly. I will edit
$endgroup$
– ElementX
Jan 14 at 6:29
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I'm assuming that you mean both $f$ and $g$ are $mathcal{F}$-measurable?
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 14 at 5:32
$begingroup$
Yeah... I forgot to state it clearly. I will edit
$endgroup$
– ElementX
Jan 14 at 6:29
1
1
$begingroup$
I'm assuming that you mean both $f$ and $g$ are $mathcal{F}$-measurable?
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 14 at 5:32
$begingroup$
I'm assuming that you mean both $f$ and $g$ are $mathcal{F}$-measurable?
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 14 at 5:32
$begingroup$
Yeah... I forgot to state it clearly. I will edit
$endgroup$
– ElementX
Jan 14 at 6:29
$begingroup$
Yeah... I forgot to state it clearly. I will edit
$endgroup$
– ElementX
Jan 14 at 6:29
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes. Assume $f$ and $g$ are $mathcal{F}$-measurable. Then by assumption you have
$$0=int_{{f>g}}fdmu-int_{{f>g}}gdmu=int_{{f>g}}(f-g)dmu$$
Since $(f-g)cdot1_{{f>g}}ge 0$, you have $mu({f>g})=0$ and $mu({f<g})=0$ analogously.
Remark: This property is used to define conditional expectation, which is an important concept in stochastics.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
${ fneq g}= underset{nin mathbb{N}}{bigcup} { f-g geq frac{1}{n} } cup underset{nin mathbb{N}}{bigcup} { g-f geq frac{1}{n} } $
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072870%2fabout-two-functions-whose-lebesgue-integral-on-all-sets-of-a-sigma-algebra-ar%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes. Assume $f$ and $g$ are $mathcal{F}$-measurable. Then by assumption you have
$$0=int_{{f>g}}fdmu-int_{{f>g}}gdmu=int_{{f>g}}(f-g)dmu$$
Since $(f-g)cdot1_{{f>g}}ge 0$, you have $mu({f>g})=0$ and $mu({f<g})=0$ analogously.
Remark: This property is used to define conditional expectation, which is an important concept in stochastics.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes. Assume $f$ and $g$ are $mathcal{F}$-measurable. Then by assumption you have
$$0=int_{{f>g}}fdmu-int_{{f>g}}gdmu=int_{{f>g}}(f-g)dmu$$
Since $(f-g)cdot1_{{f>g}}ge 0$, you have $mu({f>g})=0$ and $mu({f<g})=0$ analogously.
Remark: This property is used to define conditional expectation, which is an important concept in stochastics.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes. Assume $f$ and $g$ are $mathcal{F}$-measurable. Then by assumption you have
$$0=int_{{f>g}}fdmu-int_{{f>g}}gdmu=int_{{f>g}}(f-g)dmu$$
Since $(f-g)cdot1_{{f>g}}ge 0$, you have $mu({f>g})=0$ and $mu({f<g})=0$ analogously.
Remark: This property is used to define conditional expectation, which is an important concept in stochastics.
$endgroup$
Yes. Assume $f$ and $g$ are $mathcal{F}$-measurable. Then by assumption you have
$$0=int_{{f>g}}fdmu-int_{{f>g}}gdmu=int_{{f>g}}(f-g)dmu$$
Since $(f-g)cdot1_{{f>g}}ge 0$, you have $mu({f>g})=0$ and $mu({f<g})=0$ analogously.
Remark: This property is used to define conditional expectation, which is an important concept in stochastics.
edited Jan 14 at 16:19
answered Jan 14 at 5:45
user408858user408858
482213
482213
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
${ fneq g}= underset{nin mathbb{N}}{bigcup} { f-g geq frac{1}{n} } cup underset{nin mathbb{N}}{bigcup} { g-f geq frac{1}{n} } $
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
${ fneq g}= underset{nin mathbb{N}}{bigcup} { f-g geq frac{1}{n} } cup underset{nin mathbb{N}}{bigcup} { g-f geq frac{1}{n} } $
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
${ fneq g}= underset{nin mathbb{N}}{bigcup} { f-g geq frac{1}{n} } cup underset{nin mathbb{N}}{bigcup} { g-f geq frac{1}{n} } $
$endgroup$
Hint:
${ fneq g}= underset{nin mathbb{N}}{bigcup} { f-g geq frac{1}{n} } cup underset{nin mathbb{N}}{bigcup} { g-f geq frac{1}{n} } $
answered Jan 14 at 5:42
Keen-ameteurKeen-ameteur
1,367316
1,367316
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072870%2fabout-two-functions-whose-lebesgue-integral-on-all-sets-of-a-sigma-algebra-ar%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
I'm assuming that you mean both $f$ and $g$ are $mathcal{F}$-measurable?
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 14 at 5:32
$begingroup$
Yeah... I forgot to state it clearly. I will edit
$endgroup$
– ElementX
Jan 14 at 6:29