Sum of numerators divided by sum of denominators $leq$ the maximum fraction [duplicate]












-2















This question already has an answer here:




  • shorter proof of generalized mediant inequality?

    2 answers




Let $tfrac{a_1}{b_1},dots,tfrac{a_n}{b_n}$ where $a_i,b_i>0$. How can one prove that $$frac{sum_i a_i}{sum_i b_i}leq max_j tfrac{a_j}{b_j}$$?






inequality summation







share|cite|improve this question















marked as duplicate by Martin R, Shubham Johri, Community♦ 2 days ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.




















    -2















    This question already has an answer here:




    • shorter proof of generalized mediant inequality?

      2 answers




    Let $tfrac{a_1}{b_1},dots,tfrac{a_n}{b_n}$ where $a_i,b_i>0$. How can one prove that $$frac{sum_i a_i}{sum_i b_i}leq max_j tfrac{a_j}{b_j}$$?






    inequality summation







    share|cite|improve this question















    marked as duplicate by Martin R, Shubham Johri, Community♦ 2 days ago


    This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.


















      -2












      -2








      -2








      This question already has an answer here:




      • shorter proof of generalized mediant inequality?

        2 answers




      Let $tfrac{a_1}{b_1},dots,tfrac{a_n}{b_n}$ where $a_i,b_i>0$. How can one prove that $$frac{sum_i a_i}{sum_i b_i}leq max_j tfrac{a_j}{b_j}$$?






      inequality summation







      share|cite|improve this question
















      This question already has an answer here:




      • shorter proof of generalized mediant inequality?

        2 answers




      Let $tfrac{a_1}{b_1},dots,tfrac{a_n}{b_n}$ where $a_i,b_i>0$. How can one prove that $$frac{sum_i a_i}{sum_i b_i}leq max_j tfrac{a_j}{b_j}$$?





      This question already has an answer here:




      • shorter proof of generalized mediant inequality?

        2 answers







      inequality summation




      inequality summation






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago









      Michael Rozenberg

      97.4k1589188




      97.4k1589188










      asked 2 days ago









      Amihai ZivanAmihai Zivan

      1,87411624




      1,87411624




      marked as duplicate by Martin R, Shubham Johri, Community♦ 2 days ago


      This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






      marked as duplicate by Martin R, Shubham Johri, Community♦ 2 days ago


      This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          Let for all $k$ we have
          $$frac{a_j}{b_j}geqfrac{a_k}{b_k}$$ or
          $$a_jb_kgeq a_kb_j.$$
          Thus, $$a_jsum_{k=1}^nb_kgeqsum_{k=1}^na_kb_j=b_jsum_{k=1}^na_k.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer





























            1














            Let $${a_kover b_k}=max_i{a_iover b_i}$$therefore $${a_iover b_i}le {a_kover b_k}$$for any $i$ which is equivalent to $$a_ib_kle a_kb_i$$by a summation we finally have $$b_ksum_i a_ile a_ksum_i b_i$$or $${sum_i a_iover sum_i b_i}le {a_kover b_k}=max_i{a_iover b_i}$$






            share|cite|improve this answer




























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2














              Let for all $k$ we have
              $$frac{a_j}{b_j}geqfrac{a_k}{b_k}$$ or
              $$a_jb_kgeq a_kb_j.$$
              Thus, $$a_jsum_{k=1}^nb_kgeqsum_{k=1}^na_kb_j=b_jsum_{k=1}^na_k.$$






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                2














                Let for all $k$ we have
                $$frac{a_j}{b_j}geqfrac{a_k}{b_k}$$ or
                $$a_jb_kgeq a_kb_j.$$
                Thus, $$a_jsum_{k=1}^nb_kgeqsum_{k=1}^na_kb_j=b_jsum_{k=1}^na_k.$$






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  2












                  2








                  2






                  Let for all $k$ we have
                  $$frac{a_j}{b_j}geqfrac{a_k}{b_k}$$ or
                  $$a_jb_kgeq a_kb_j.$$
                  Thus, $$a_jsum_{k=1}^nb_kgeqsum_{k=1}^na_kb_j=b_jsum_{k=1}^na_k.$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  Let for all $k$ we have
                  $$frac{a_j}{b_j}geqfrac{a_k}{b_k}$$ or
                  $$a_jb_kgeq a_kb_j.$$
                  Thus, $$a_jsum_{k=1}^nb_kgeqsum_{k=1}^na_kb_j=b_jsum_{k=1}^na_k.$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 2 days ago









                  Michael RozenbergMichael Rozenberg

                  97.4k1589188




                  97.4k1589188























                      1














                      Let $${a_kover b_k}=max_i{a_iover b_i}$$therefore $${a_iover b_i}le {a_kover b_k}$$for any $i$ which is equivalent to $$a_ib_kle a_kb_i$$by a summation we finally have $$b_ksum_i a_ile a_ksum_i b_i$$or $${sum_i a_iover sum_i b_i}le {a_kover b_k}=max_i{a_iover b_i}$$






                      share|cite|improve this answer


























                        1














                        Let $${a_kover b_k}=max_i{a_iover b_i}$$therefore $${a_iover b_i}le {a_kover b_k}$$for any $i$ which is equivalent to $$a_ib_kle a_kb_i$$by a summation we finally have $$b_ksum_i a_ile a_ksum_i b_i$$or $${sum_i a_iover sum_i b_i}le {a_kover b_k}=max_i{a_iover b_i}$$






                        share|cite|improve this answer
























                          1












                          1








                          1






                          Let $${a_kover b_k}=max_i{a_iover b_i}$$therefore $${a_iover b_i}le {a_kover b_k}$$for any $i$ which is equivalent to $$a_ib_kle a_kb_i$$by a summation we finally have $$b_ksum_i a_ile a_ksum_i b_i$$or $${sum_i a_iover sum_i b_i}le {a_kover b_k}=max_i{a_iover b_i}$$






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          Let $${a_kover b_k}=max_i{a_iover b_i}$$therefore $${a_iover b_i}le {a_kover b_k}$$for any $i$ which is equivalent to $$a_ib_kle a_kb_i$$by a summation we finally have $$b_ksum_i a_ile a_ksum_i b_i$$or $${sum_i a_iover sum_i b_i}le {a_kover b_k}=max_i{a_iover b_i}$$







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 2 days ago









                          Mostafa AyazMostafa Ayaz

                          14.2k3937




                          14.2k3937















                              -

                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Mario Kart Wii

                              Image
                              Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! Mario Kart Wii From The Cutting Room Floor Jump to: navigation, search Mario Kart Wii Developer : Nintendo Publisher : Nintendo Platform : Wii Released in JP : April 10, 2008 Released in US : April 27, 2008 Released in EU : April 11, 2008 Released in AU : April 24, 2008 Released in KR : April 30, 2009 This game has unused animations. This game has unused areas. This game has unused code. This game has unused objects. This game has unused modes / minigames. This game has unused graphics. This game has unused models. This game has unused items. This game has unused music. This game has regional differences. This game has a notes page This game has a prerelease article Mario Kart Wii is the sixth game in the series (not counting Arcade editions), which intro
                              Read more

                              What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

                              Image
                              5 Does "Dominus providebit" mean "The Lord will provide" or "The Lord provides"? I once had a bit of an argument with a guy who studied Latin over that. It's an inscription that appears on the rim of some old Swiss coins that I have. meaning latin-to-english-translation grammar-identification share | improve this question edited Jan 18 at 15:27 V2Blast 105 4 asked Jan 17 at 22:49 Donald K. Donald K. 26 1
                              Read more

                              Antonio Litta Visconti Arese

                              Image
                              Antonio Litta Visconti Arese I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò In carica 1797 – 1820 Predecessore Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Successore Alfonso Litta Visconti Arese Trattamento Sua grazia Altri titoli Duca Litta Conte del Regno napoleonico d'Italia Patrizio milanese Don Nascita Milano, 2 maggio 1748 Morte Milano, 14 agosto 1820 Dinastia Litta Visconti Arese Padre Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Madre Maria Elisabetta Visconti Borromeo Consorte Barbara Barbiano di Belgioioso Religione cattolicesimo Antonio Litta Visconti Arese , I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò (Milano, 2 maggio 1748 – Milano, 14 agosto 1820), è stato un nobile e politico italiano. Composizione "Il pastore svizzero" di Pietro Morlacchi, con dedica Indice 1 Biografia 2 Onorificenze 3 Araldica 4 Albero genealogico 5 Note 6 Altri progetti Biografia | Antonio Litta Visco
                              Read more