A simple game with $n$ points in 3D space - red triangle wins












0














(Once again a son is torturing his father...)



Alice and Bob play a fairly simple game with $n$ predefined points in 3D space. No four points are complanar (which also implies that no three points are collinear).



They play in turns by connecting points that are not yet connected with straight segments. On her turn Alice connects a single pair of unconnected points with a single segment of red color. After that Bob connects $k$ pairs of unconnected points with $k$ segments of blue color.



Alice wins if she is able to create a triangle with red sides. If all points are connected and Alice was not able to create a red sided triangle before that, Bob wins.



Who has a winning strategy?



My thoughts: obviously, the outcome of the game heavily depends on releation between $n$ and $k$.



Suppose that $k=1$ with big enough value for $n$. Alice will simply draw segment $AB$, Bob draws his segment at will, Alice then draws $AC$, Bob blocks triangle $ABC$ by drawing segment BC, Alice draws segment $AD$ and Bob is lost. He cannot block triangles $ABD$ and $ACD$ by drawgin a single segment.



On the other side, with $k$ big enough, Bob can easily block creation of all red triangles by drawing a lot of lines.



So for $kle k_1$, Alice wins. For $kge k_2ge k_1$, Bob wins. I need some estimate for $k_1$ and $k_2$ (better than mine). Also note that the game always has a winner. Does it mean that $k_1=k_2$? I guess it does, but if we are just trying to estimate the lower and the upper bound, we can come up with two different values.










share|cite|improve this question



























    0














    (Once again a son is torturing his father...)



    Alice and Bob play a fairly simple game with $n$ predefined points in 3D space. No four points are complanar (which also implies that no three points are collinear).



    They play in turns by connecting points that are not yet connected with straight segments. On her turn Alice connects a single pair of unconnected points with a single segment of red color. After that Bob connects $k$ pairs of unconnected points with $k$ segments of blue color.



    Alice wins if she is able to create a triangle with red sides. If all points are connected and Alice was not able to create a red sided triangle before that, Bob wins.



    Who has a winning strategy?



    My thoughts: obviously, the outcome of the game heavily depends on releation between $n$ and $k$.



    Suppose that $k=1$ with big enough value for $n$. Alice will simply draw segment $AB$, Bob draws his segment at will, Alice then draws $AC$, Bob blocks triangle $ABC$ by drawing segment BC, Alice draws segment $AD$ and Bob is lost. He cannot block triangles $ABD$ and $ACD$ by drawgin a single segment.



    On the other side, with $k$ big enough, Bob can easily block creation of all red triangles by drawing a lot of lines.



    So for $kle k_1$, Alice wins. For $kge k_2ge k_1$, Bob wins. I need some estimate for $k_1$ and $k_2$ (better than mine). Also note that the game always has a winner. Does it mean that $k_1=k_2$? I guess it does, but if we are just trying to estimate the lower and the upper bound, we can come up with two different values.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      (Once again a son is torturing his father...)



      Alice and Bob play a fairly simple game with $n$ predefined points in 3D space. No four points are complanar (which also implies that no three points are collinear).



      They play in turns by connecting points that are not yet connected with straight segments. On her turn Alice connects a single pair of unconnected points with a single segment of red color. After that Bob connects $k$ pairs of unconnected points with $k$ segments of blue color.



      Alice wins if she is able to create a triangle with red sides. If all points are connected and Alice was not able to create a red sided triangle before that, Bob wins.



      Who has a winning strategy?



      My thoughts: obviously, the outcome of the game heavily depends on releation between $n$ and $k$.



      Suppose that $k=1$ with big enough value for $n$. Alice will simply draw segment $AB$, Bob draws his segment at will, Alice then draws $AC$, Bob blocks triangle $ABC$ by drawing segment BC, Alice draws segment $AD$ and Bob is lost. He cannot block triangles $ABD$ and $ACD$ by drawgin a single segment.



      On the other side, with $k$ big enough, Bob can easily block creation of all red triangles by drawing a lot of lines.



      So for $kle k_1$, Alice wins. For $kge k_2ge k_1$, Bob wins. I need some estimate for $k_1$ and $k_2$ (better than mine). Also note that the game always has a winner. Does it mean that $k_1=k_2$? I guess it does, but if we are just trying to estimate the lower and the upper bound, we can come up with two different values.










      share|cite|improve this question













      (Once again a son is torturing his father...)



      Alice and Bob play a fairly simple game with $n$ predefined points in 3D space. No four points are complanar (which also implies that no three points are collinear).



      They play in turns by connecting points that are not yet connected with straight segments. On her turn Alice connects a single pair of unconnected points with a single segment of red color. After that Bob connects $k$ pairs of unconnected points with $k$ segments of blue color.



      Alice wins if she is able to create a triangle with red sides. If all points are connected and Alice was not able to create a red sided triangle before that, Bob wins.



      Who has a winning strategy?



      My thoughts: obviously, the outcome of the game heavily depends on releation between $n$ and $k$.



      Suppose that $k=1$ with big enough value for $n$. Alice will simply draw segment $AB$, Bob draws his segment at will, Alice then draws $AC$, Bob blocks triangle $ABC$ by drawing segment BC, Alice draws segment $AD$ and Bob is lost. He cannot block triangles $ABD$ and $ACD$ by drawgin a single segment.



      On the other side, with $k$ big enough, Bob can easily block creation of all red triangles by drawing a lot of lines.



      So for $kle k_1$, Alice wins. For $kge k_2ge k_1$, Bob wins. I need some estimate for $k_1$ and $k_2$ (better than mine). Also note that the game always has a winner. Does it mean that $k_1=k_2$? I guess it does, but if we are just trying to estimate the lower and the upper bound, we can come up with two different values.







      combinatorics combinatorial-game-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 2 days ago









      OldboyOldboy

      7,1441832




      7,1441832






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063167%2fa-simple-game-with-n-points-in-3d-space-red-triangle-wins%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063167%2fa-simple-game-with-n-points-in-3d-space-red-triangle-wins%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Mario Kart Wii

          The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

          What does “Dominus providebit” mean?