Problem 16.4 on related vector fields Differentiable Manifolds Marcut
In the course I am taking on differentiable manifolds, we have been using the notes written by Marcut . This problem caught my attention as it seemed pretty straightforward.
Consider the map:
$$phi: mathbb{R}^2 to mathbb{R}^2,~ phi(x,y):=(e^xcos(y),e^xsin(y))$$
- Find two vector fields $X,~Y~in~mathfrak{X}(mathbb{R}^2$ such that $X$ is $phi$-related to $partial_x$ and $Y$ is $phi$-related to $partial_y$. Are these vector fields uniquely determined by this condition?. Calculate $[X,Y]$
- Find two vector fields $U,~V~in~mathfrak{X}(mathbb{R}^2$ such that $partial_x$ is $phi$-related to $U$ and $partial_y$ is $phi$-related to $V$. Are these vector fields uniquely determined by this condition?. Calculate $[U,V]$
Solution
I have found and checked the solutions for both parts.
For part a), I used the fact that the required condition is equivalent to $ partial_x(phi^*(f))=phi^*(X( f)) label{eq:related}$. I find $X$. Using the same procedure for $Y$, I get that:
$$X = xpartial_x+ypartial_y,~ Y= -ypartial_x+xpartial_y$$
$$[X,Y]=0$$
For part b), I noticed that $U$ can be written as $U=u_1(x,y)partial_x+u_2(x,y)partial_y$. Using the condition that $U(phi^*(f))_p=(partial_u( f))_{phi(p)}$, I find $U$. Using the same procedure for $V$, I get:
$$U= e^{-x}cos(y)partial_x-e^{-x}sin(y)partial_y,~V= e^{-x}sin(y)partial_x+e^{-x}cos(y)partial_y$$
$$[U,V]=0$$
So in summary:
- In part a), we are finding the pushforward of the coordinate directions: $$X=phi_*(partial_x),~Y=phi_*(partial_y) $$
- In part b), we are finding vector fields that correspond to the pushforward of he coordinate vector fields:
$$U,~V~ text{such that}~ phi_*(U)=partial_x,~phi_*(V)=partial_y$$.
Because the pushfoward has the property that $F_*[X,Y]=[F_*X,F_*Y]$, I know that the lie bracket in both cases should be 0, since $[partial_x, partial_y]=0$
My questions are:
Is my summary of the problem correct?
I am not sure if the vector fields in both cases are uniquely determined by these conditions. I think they are uniquely determined by these conditions if $phi$ was bijective. But that is not the case. How can I know if those fields are uniquely determined?
differential-geometry vector-fields
add a comment |
In the course I am taking on differentiable manifolds, we have been using the notes written by Marcut . This problem caught my attention as it seemed pretty straightforward.
Consider the map:
$$phi: mathbb{R}^2 to mathbb{R}^2,~ phi(x,y):=(e^xcos(y),e^xsin(y))$$
- Find two vector fields $X,~Y~in~mathfrak{X}(mathbb{R}^2$ such that $X$ is $phi$-related to $partial_x$ and $Y$ is $phi$-related to $partial_y$. Are these vector fields uniquely determined by this condition?. Calculate $[X,Y]$
- Find two vector fields $U,~V~in~mathfrak{X}(mathbb{R}^2$ such that $partial_x$ is $phi$-related to $U$ and $partial_y$ is $phi$-related to $V$. Are these vector fields uniquely determined by this condition?. Calculate $[U,V]$
Solution
I have found and checked the solutions for both parts.
For part a), I used the fact that the required condition is equivalent to $ partial_x(phi^*(f))=phi^*(X( f)) label{eq:related}$. I find $X$. Using the same procedure for $Y$, I get that:
$$X = xpartial_x+ypartial_y,~ Y= -ypartial_x+xpartial_y$$
$$[X,Y]=0$$
For part b), I noticed that $U$ can be written as $U=u_1(x,y)partial_x+u_2(x,y)partial_y$. Using the condition that $U(phi^*(f))_p=(partial_u( f))_{phi(p)}$, I find $U$. Using the same procedure for $V$, I get:
$$U= e^{-x}cos(y)partial_x-e^{-x}sin(y)partial_y,~V= e^{-x}sin(y)partial_x+e^{-x}cos(y)partial_y$$
$$[U,V]=0$$
So in summary:
- In part a), we are finding the pushforward of the coordinate directions: $$X=phi_*(partial_x),~Y=phi_*(partial_y) $$
- In part b), we are finding vector fields that correspond to the pushforward of he coordinate vector fields:
$$U,~V~ text{such that}~ phi_*(U)=partial_x,~phi_*(V)=partial_y$$.
Because the pushfoward has the property that $F_*[X,Y]=[F_*X,F_*Y]$, I know that the lie bracket in both cases should be 0, since $[partial_x, partial_y]=0$
My questions are:
Is my summary of the problem correct?
I am not sure if the vector fields in both cases are uniquely determined by these conditions. I think they are uniquely determined by these conditions if $phi$ was bijective. But that is not the case. How can I know if those fields are uniquely determined?
differential-geometry vector-fields
Whoa. $phi$ is far from bijective.
– Ted Shifrin
2 days ago
That is right (corrected that in the question). The map$phi$ is not bijective, it will cover $mathbb{R}^2$ many times as $sin(y)$ varies. Then, I have no idea about why those fields are uniquely determined.
– Amphiaraos
2 days ago
add a comment |
In the course I am taking on differentiable manifolds, we have been using the notes written by Marcut . This problem caught my attention as it seemed pretty straightforward.
Consider the map:
$$phi: mathbb{R}^2 to mathbb{R}^2,~ phi(x,y):=(e^xcos(y),e^xsin(y))$$
- Find two vector fields $X,~Y~in~mathfrak{X}(mathbb{R}^2$ such that $X$ is $phi$-related to $partial_x$ and $Y$ is $phi$-related to $partial_y$. Are these vector fields uniquely determined by this condition?. Calculate $[X,Y]$
- Find two vector fields $U,~V~in~mathfrak{X}(mathbb{R}^2$ such that $partial_x$ is $phi$-related to $U$ and $partial_y$ is $phi$-related to $V$. Are these vector fields uniquely determined by this condition?. Calculate $[U,V]$
Solution
I have found and checked the solutions for both parts.
For part a), I used the fact that the required condition is equivalent to $ partial_x(phi^*(f))=phi^*(X( f)) label{eq:related}$. I find $X$. Using the same procedure for $Y$, I get that:
$$X = xpartial_x+ypartial_y,~ Y= -ypartial_x+xpartial_y$$
$$[X,Y]=0$$
For part b), I noticed that $U$ can be written as $U=u_1(x,y)partial_x+u_2(x,y)partial_y$. Using the condition that $U(phi^*(f))_p=(partial_u( f))_{phi(p)}$, I find $U$. Using the same procedure for $V$, I get:
$$U= e^{-x}cos(y)partial_x-e^{-x}sin(y)partial_y,~V= e^{-x}sin(y)partial_x+e^{-x}cos(y)partial_y$$
$$[U,V]=0$$
So in summary:
- In part a), we are finding the pushforward of the coordinate directions: $$X=phi_*(partial_x),~Y=phi_*(partial_y) $$
- In part b), we are finding vector fields that correspond to the pushforward of he coordinate vector fields:
$$U,~V~ text{such that}~ phi_*(U)=partial_x,~phi_*(V)=partial_y$$.
Because the pushfoward has the property that $F_*[X,Y]=[F_*X,F_*Y]$, I know that the lie bracket in both cases should be 0, since $[partial_x, partial_y]=0$
My questions are:
Is my summary of the problem correct?
I am not sure if the vector fields in both cases are uniquely determined by these conditions. I think they are uniquely determined by these conditions if $phi$ was bijective. But that is not the case. How can I know if those fields are uniquely determined?
differential-geometry vector-fields
In the course I am taking on differentiable manifolds, we have been using the notes written by Marcut . This problem caught my attention as it seemed pretty straightforward.
Consider the map:
$$phi: mathbb{R}^2 to mathbb{R}^2,~ phi(x,y):=(e^xcos(y),e^xsin(y))$$
- Find two vector fields $X,~Y~in~mathfrak{X}(mathbb{R}^2$ such that $X$ is $phi$-related to $partial_x$ and $Y$ is $phi$-related to $partial_y$. Are these vector fields uniquely determined by this condition?. Calculate $[X,Y]$
- Find two vector fields $U,~V~in~mathfrak{X}(mathbb{R}^2$ such that $partial_x$ is $phi$-related to $U$ and $partial_y$ is $phi$-related to $V$. Are these vector fields uniquely determined by this condition?. Calculate $[U,V]$
Solution
I have found and checked the solutions for both parts.
For part a), I used the fact that the required condition is equivalent to $ partial_x(phi^*(f))=phi^*(X( f)) label{eq:related}$. I find $X$. Using the same procedure for $Y$, I get that:
$$X = xpartial_x+ypartial_y,~ Y= -ypartial_x+xpartial_y$$
$$[X,Y]=0$$
For part b), I noticed that $U$ can be written as $U=u_1(x,y)partial_x+u_2(x,y)partial_y$. Using the condition that $U(phi^*(f))_p=(partial_u( f))_{phi(p)}$, I find $U$. Using the same procedure for $V$, I get:
$$U= e^{-x}cos(y)partial_x-e^{-x}sin(y)partial_y,~V= e^{-x}sin(y)partial_x+e^{-x}cos(y)partial_y$$
$$[U,V]=0$$
So in summary:
- In part a), we are finding the pushforward of the coordinate directions: $$X=phi_*(partial_x),~Y=phi_*(partial_y) $$
- In part b), we are finding vector fields that correspond to the pushforward of he coordinate vector fields:
$$U,~V~ text{such that}~ phi_*(U)=partial_x,~phi_*(V)=partial_y$$.
Because the pushfoward has the property that $F_*[X,Y]=[F_*X,F_*Y]$, I know that the lie bracket in both cases should be 0, since $[partial_x, partial_y]=0$
My questions are:
Is my summary of the problem correct?
I am not sure if the vector fields in both cases are uniquely determined by these conditions. I think they are uniquely determined by these conditions if $phi$ was bijective. But that is not the case. How can I know if those fields are uniquely determined?
differential-geometry vector-fields
differential-geometry vector-fields
edited 2 days ago
Amphiaraos
asked 2 days ago
AmphiaraosAmphiaraos
301211
301211
Whoa. $phi$ is far from bijective.
– Ted Shifrin
2 days ago
That is right (corrected that in the question). The map$phi$ is not bijective, it will cover $mathbb{R}^2$ many times as $sin(y)$ varies. Then, I have no idea about why those fields are uniquely determined.
– Amphiaraos
2 days ago
add a comment |
Whoa. $phi$ is far from bijective.
– Ted Shifrin
2 days ago
That is right (corrected that in the question). The map$phi$ is not bijective, it will cover $mathbb{R}^2$ many times as $sin(y)$ varies. Then, I have no idea about why those fields are uniquely determined.
– Amphiaraos
2 days ago
Whoa. $phi$ is far from bijective.
– Ted Shifrin
2 days ago
Whoa. $phi$ is far from bijective.
– Ted Shifrin
2 days ago
That is right (corrected that in the question). The map$phi$ is not bijective, it will cover $mathbb{R}^2$ many times as $sin(y)$ varies. Then, I have no idea about why those fields are uniquely determined.
– Amphiaraos
2 days ago
That is right (corrected that in the question). The map$phi$ is not bijective, it will cover $mathbb{R}^2$ many times as $sin(y)$ varies. Then, I have no idea about why those fields are uniquely determined.
– Amphiaraos
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I believe that the vector fields you found are correct, so I will only comment on the uniqueness.
Note that the differential of the map $phi$ is
begin{equation}tag{1}label{1}
d_{(x,y)}phi=begin{pmatrix} e^{x}cos y & -e^{x}sin y\ e^{x}sin y & e^{x}cos yend{pmatrix},
end{equation}
which is a linear isomorphism (its determinant is nonzero).
You found $X,Yinmathfrak{X}(mathbb{R}^{2})$ such that for all $pinmathbb{R}^{2}$:
begin{cases}
d_{p}phi[left(partial_{x}right)_{p}]=X_{phi(p)}\
d_{p}phi[left(partial_{y}right)_{p}]=Y_{phi(p)}.
end{cases}
These equations determine $X,Y$ uniquely on the image of $phi$. Since $text{Im}(phi)=mathbb{R}^{2}setminus{(0,0)}$ is dense in $mathbb{R}^{2}$, it follows by continuity that $X$ and $Y$ are uniquely determined.Now you found $U,Vinmathfrak{X}(mathbb{R}^{2})$ such that for all $pinmathbb{R}^{2}$:
begin{cases}
d_{p}phi(U_{p})=left(partial_{x}right)_{phi(p)}\
d_{p}phi(V_{p})=left(partial_{y}right)_{phi(p)}.
end{cases}
Again such $U,V$ are unique, since the differential eqref{1} is injective.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063176%2fproblem-16-4-on-related-vector-fields-differentiable-manifolds-marcut%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I believe that the vector fields you found are correct, so I will only comment on the uniqueness.
Note that the differential of the map $phi$ is
begin{equation}tag{1}label{1}
d_{(x,y)}phi=begin{pmatrix} e^{x}cos y & -e^{x}sin y\ e^{x}sin y & e^{x}cos yend{pmatrix},
end{equation}
which is a linear isomorphism (its determinant is nonzero).
You found $X,Yinmathfrak{X}(mathbb{R}^{2})$ such that for all $pinmathbb{R}^{2}$:
begin{cases}
d_{p}phi[left(partial_{x}right)_{p}]=X_{phi(p)}\
d_{p}phi[left(partial_{y}right)_{p}]=Y_{phi(p)}.
end{cases}
These equations determine $X,Y$ uniquely on the image of $phi$. Since $text{Im}(phi)=mathbb{R}^{2}setminus{(0,0)}$ is dense in $mathbb{R}^{2}$, it follows by continuity that $X$ and $Y$ are uniquely determined.Now you found $U,Vinmathfrak{X}(mathbb{R}^{2})$ such that for all $pinmathbb{R}^{2}$:
begin{cases}
d_{p}phi(U_{p})=left(partial_{x}right)_{phi(p)}\
d_{p}phi(V_{p})=left(partial_{y}right)_{phi(p)}.
end{cases}
Again such $U,V$ are unique, since the differential eqref{1} is injective.
add a comment |
I believe that the vector fields you found are correct, so I will only comment on the uniqueness.
Note that the differential of the map $phi$ is
begin{equation}tag{1}label{1}
d_{(x,y)}phi=begin{pmatrix} e^{x}cos y & -e^{x}sin y\ e^{x}sin y & e^{x}cos yend{pmatrix},
end{equation}
which is a linear isomorphism (its determinant is nonzero).
You found $X,Yinmathfrak{X}(mathbb{R}^{2})$ such that for all $pinmathbb{R}^{2}$:
begin{cases}
d_{p}phi[left(partial_{x}right)_{p}]=X_{phi(p)}\
d_{p}phi[left(partial_{y}right)_{p}]=Y_{phi(p)}.
end{cases}
These equations determine $X,Y$ uniquely on the image of $phi$. Since $text{Im}(phi)=mathbb{R}^{2}setminus{(0,0)}$ is dense in $mathbb{R}^{2}$, it follows by continuity that $X$ and $Y$ are uniquely determined.Now you found $U,Vinmathfrak{X}(mathbb{R}^{2})$ such that for all $pinmathbb{R}^{2}$:
begin{cases}
d_{p}phi(U_{p})=left(partial_{x}right)_{phi(p)}\
d_{p}phi(V_{p})=left(partial_{y}right)_{phi(p)}.
end{cases}
Again such $U,V$ are unique, since the differential eqref{1} is injective.
add a comment |
I believe that the vector fields you found are correct, so I will only comment on the uniqueness.
Note that the differential of the map $phi$ is
begin{equation}tag{1}label{1}
d_{(x,y)}phi=begin{pmatrix} e^{x}cos y & -e^{x}sin y\ e^{x}sin y & e^{x}cos yend{pmatrix},
end{equation}
which is a linear isomorphism (its determinant is nonzero).
You found $X,Yinmathfrak{X}(mathbb{R}^{2})$ such that for all $pinmathbb{R}^{2}$:
begin{cases}
d_{p}phi[left(partial_{x}right)_{p}]=X_{phi(p)}\
d_{p}phi[left(partial_{y}right)_{p}]=Y_{phi(p)}.
end{cases}
These equations determine $X,Y$ uniquely on the image of $phi$. Since $text{Im}(phi)=mathbb{R}^{2}setminus{(0,0)}$ is dense in $mathbb{R}^{2}$, it follows by continuity that $X$ and $Y$ are uniquely determined.Now you found $U,Vinmathfrak{X}(mathbb{R}^{2})$ such that for all $pinmathbb{R}^{2}$:
begin{cases}
d_{p}phi(U_{p})=left(partial_{x}right)_{phi(p)}\
d_{p}phi(V_{p})=left(partial_{y}right)_{phi(p)}.
end{cases}
Again such $U,V$ are unique, since the differential eqref{1} is injective.
I believe that the vector fields you found are correct, so I will only comment on the uniqueness.
Note that the differential of the map $phi$ is
begin{equation}tag{1}label{1}
d_{(x,y)}phi=begin{pmatrix} e^{x}cos y & -e^{x}sin y\ e^{x}sin y & e^{x}cos yend{pmatrix},
end{equation}
which is a linear isomorphism (its determinant is nonzero).
You found $X,Yinmathfrak{X}(mathbb{R}^{2})$ such that for all $pinmathbb{R}^{2}$:
begin{cases}
d_{p}phi[left(partial_{x}right)_{p}]=X_{phi(p)}\
d_{p}phi[left(partial_{y}right)_{p}]=Y_{phi(p)}.
end{cases}
These equations determine $X,Y$ uniquely on the image of $phi$. Since $text{Im}(phi)=mathbb{R}^{2}setminus{(0,0)}$ is dense in $mathbb{R}^{2}$, it follows by continuity that $X$ and $Y$ are uniquely determined.Now you found $U,Vinmathfrak{X}(mathbb{R}^{2})$ such that for all $pinmathbb{R}^{2}$:
begin{cases}
d_{p}phi(U_{p})=left(partial_{x}right)_{phi(p)}\
d_{p}phi(V_{p})=left(partial_{y}right)_{phi(p)}.
end{cases}
Again such $U,V$ are unique, since the differential eqref{1} is injective.
answered yesterday
studiosusstudiosus
1,657713
1,657713
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063176%2fproblem-16-4-on-related-vector-fields-differentiable-manifolds-marcut%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Whoa. $phi$ is far from bijective.
– Ted Shifrin
2 days ago
That is right (corrected that in the question). The map$phi$ is not bijective, it will cover $mathbb{R}^2$ many times as $sin(y)$ varies. Then, I have no idea about why those fields are uniquely determined.
– Amphiaraos
2 days ago