Alternative proof for $zetaleft(2,frac14right)=psi^{(1)}left(frac14right)=pi^2+8G$












3














On the German Wikipedia page of the Hurwitz Zeta Function I have come across the following formula




$$zetaleft(2,frac14right)~=~pi^2+8Gtag1$$




where $G$ is Catalan's Constant. Even though I was able proving $(1)$ I am dissatisfied with my own attempt since it is heavily relying on several special Zeta Functions. However, first of all I will present my own solution. Starting with the series representation of $zeta(2)$ we get



$$begin{align*}
zeta(2)=sum_{n=1}^infty frac1{n^2}&=frac1{1^2}+frac1{2^2}+frac1{3^2}+sum_{n=1}^inftyfrac1{(4n)^2}+frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+2)^2}+frac1{(4n+3)^2}\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{4(2n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+3)^2}\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+frac14lambda(2)+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac12left[frac1{(2n+1)^2}-frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)^2}right]\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+frac14lambda(2)+frac12[lambda(2)-beta(2)]+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}\
therefore~sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}&=frac{15}{16}zeta(2)-frac34lambda(2)+frac12beta(2)\
&=frac{15}{16}zeta(2)-frac34frac34zeta(2)+frac12 G\&=frac1{16}pi^2+frac12 G
end{align*}$$




$$therefore~zetaleft(2,frac14right)~=~sum_{n=0}^inftyfrac1{left(n+frac14right)^2}~=~pi^2+8G$$




Where $zeta(s)$ dnotes the Riemann Zeta Function, $lambda(s)$ the Dirichlet Lambda Function, $beta(s)$ the Dirichlet Beta Function. Moreover the relation $lambda(s)=(1-2^{-s})zeta(s)$ and the well-known values $zeta(2)=frac{pi^2}6$ and $beta(2)=G$ were used.




I am suspicious about the heavy usage of the whole Zeta Function machinery and I am curious if there exists a shorter and more elegant way of proving $(1)$?




Thanks in advance!



EDIT



As Zacky pointed out within the comments this special value of the Hurwitz Zeta Function can also be interpreted as a particular value of the Trigamma Function hence in general we got a the following series expansion of the Polygamma Function



$$begin{align*}
psi^{(n)(z)}&=(-1)^{n+1}n!sum_{k=0}^inftyfrac1{(z+k)^{n+1}}\
&=(-1)^{n+1}n!zeta(n+1,z)
end{align*}$$



So for $n=1$ and $z=frac14$ it directly follows that



$$(-1)^{1+1}(1!)psi^{(1)}left(frac14right)=zetaleft(1+1,frac14right)Rightarrow psi^{(1)}left(frac14right)=zetaleft(2,frac14right)$$










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Isn't this $psi_1 left(frac14right)$ (trigamma function)? See here: mathworld.wolfram.com/TrigammaFunction.html
    – Zacky
    Jan 5 at 19:24












  • @Zacky This is due the more general fact that $$psi^{(n)}(z)~=~(-1)^{n+1}n!zeta(n+1,z)$$ which can be shown directly with the series representation of both functions. But thank I you, I have forgotten about this relation.
    – mrtaurho
    Jan 5 at 19:28












  • I see, so basically the question is to prove that $psileft(frac14right) =pi^2 +8G$, right?
    – Zacky
    Jan 5 at 19:29










  • @Zacky Yes and no. Basically it is the same question, yes even though I am more interested in Zeta Functions at the moment.
    – mrtaurho
    Jan 5 at 19:30
















3














On the German Wikipedia page of the Hurwitz Zeta Function I have come across the following formula




$$zetaleft(2,frac14right)~=~pi^2+8Gtag1$$




where $G$ is Catalan's Constant. Even though I was able proving $(1)$ I am dissatisfied with my own attempt since it is heavily relying on several special Zeta Functions. However, first of all I will present my own solution. Starting with the series representation of $zeta(2)$ we get



$$begin{align*}
zeta(2)=sum_{n=1}^infty frac1{n^2}&=frac1{1^2}+frac1{2^2}+frac1{3^2}+sum_{n=1}^inftyfrac1{(4n)^2}+frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+2)^2}+frac1{(4n+3)^2}\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{4(2n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+3)^2}\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+frac14lambda(2)+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac12left[frac1{(2n+1)^2}-frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)^2}right]\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+frac14lambda(2)+frac12[lambda(2)-beta(2)]+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}\
therefore~sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}&=frac{15}{16}zeta(2)-frac34lambda(2)+frac12beta(2)\
&=frac{15}{16}zeta(2)-frac34frac34zeta(2)+frac12 G\&=frac1{16}pi^2+frac12 G
end{align*}$$




$$therefore~zetaleft(2,frac14right)~=~sum_{n=0}^inftyfrac1{left(n+frac14right)^2}~=~pi^2+8G$$




Where $zeta(s)$ dnotes the Riemann Zeta Function, $lambda(s)$ the Dirichlet Lambda Function, $beta(s)$ the Dirichlet Beta Function. Moreover the relation $lambda(s)=(1-2^{-s})zeta(s)$ and the well-known values $zeta(2)=frac{pi^2}6$ and $beta(2)=G$ were used.




I am suspicious about the heavy usage of the whole Zeta Function machinery and I am curious if there exists a shorter and more elegant way of proving $(1)$?




Thanks in advance!



EDIT



As Zacky pointed out within the comments this special value of the Hurwitz Zeta Function can also be interpreted as a particular value of the Trigamma Function hence in general we got a the following series expansion of the Polygamma Function



$$begin{align*}
psi^{(n)(z)}&=(-1)^{n+1}n!sum_{k=0}^inftyfrac1{(z+k)^{n+1}}\
&=(-1)^{n+1}n!zeta(n+1,z)
end{align*}$$



So for $n=1$ and $z=frac14$ it directly follows that



$$(-1)^{1+1}(1!)psi^{(1)}left(frac14right)=zetaleft(1+1,frac14right)Rightarrow psi^{(1)}left(frac14right)=zetaleft(2,frac14right)$$










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Isn't this $psi_1 left(frac14right)$ (trigamma function)? See here: mathworld.wolfram.com/TrigammaFunction.html
    – Zacky
    Jan 5 at 19:24












  • @Zacky This is due the more general fact that $$psi^{(n)}(z)~=~(-1)^{n+1}n!zeta(n+1,z)$$ which can be shown directly with the series representation of both functions. But thank I you, I have forgotten about this relation.
    – mrtaurho
    Jan 5 at 19:28












  • I see, so basically the question is to prove that $psileft(frac14right) =pi^2 +8G$, right?
    – Zacky
    Jan 5 at 19:29










  • @Zacky Yes and no. Basically it is the same question, yes even though I am more interested in Zeta Functions at the moment.
    – mrtaurho
    Jan 5 at 19:30














3












3








3


2





On the German Wikipedia page of the Hurwitz Zeta Function I have come across the following formula




$$zetaleft(2,frac14right)~=~pi^2+8Gtag1$$




where $G$ is Catalan's Constant. Even though I was able proving $(1)$ I am dissatisfied with my own attempt since it is heavily relying on several special Zeta Functions. However, first of all I will present my own solution. Starting with the series representation of $zeta(2)$ we get



$$begin{align*}
zeta(2)=sum_{n=1}^infty frac1{n^2}&=frac1{1^2}+frac1{2^2}+frac1{3^2}+sum_{n=1}^inftyfrac1{(4n)^2}+frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+2)^2}+frac1{(4n+3)^2}\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{4(2n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+3)^2}\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+frac14lambda(2)+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac12left[frac1{(2n+1)^2}-frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)^2}right]\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+frac14lambda(2)+frac12[lambda(2)-beta(2)]+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}\
therefore~sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}&=frac{15}{16}zeta(2)-frac34lambda(2)+frac12beta(2)\
&=frac{15}{16}zeta(2)-frac34frac34zeta(2)+frac12 G\&=frac1{16}pi^2+frac12 G
end{align*}$$




$$therefore~zetaleft(2,frac14right)~=~sum_{n=0}^inftyfrac1{left(n+frac14right)^2}~=~pi^2+8G$$




Where $zeta(s)$ dnotes the Riemann Zeta Function, $lambda(s)$ the Dirichlet Lambda Function, $beta(s)$ the Dirichlet Beta Function. Moreover the relation $lambda(s)=(1-2^{-s})zeta(s)$ and the well-known values $zeta(2)=frac{pi^2}6$ and $beta(2)=G$ were used.




I am suspicious about the heavy usage of the whole Zeta Function machinery and I am curious if there exists a shorter and more elegant way of proving $(1)$?




Thanks in advance!



EDIT



As Zacky pointed out within the comments this special value of the Hurwitz Zeta Function can also be interpreted as a particular value of the Trigamma Function hence in general we got a the following series expansion of the Polygamma Function



$$begin{align*}
psi^{(n)(z)}&=(-1)^{n+1}n!sum_{k=0}^inftyfrac1{(z+k)^{n+1}}\
&=(-1)^{n+1}n!zeta(n+1,z)
end{align*}$$



So for $n=1$ and $z=frac14$ it directly follows that



$$(-1)^{1+1}(1!)psi^{(1)}left(frac14right)=zetaleft(1+1,frac14right)Rightarrow psi^{(1)}left(frac14right)=zetaleft(2,frac14right)$$










share|cite|improve this question















On the German Wikipedia page of the Hurwitz Zeta Function I have come across the following formula




$$zetaleft(2,frac14right)~=~pi^2+8Gtag1$$




where $G$ is Catalan's Constant. Even though I was able proving $(1)$ I am dissatisfied with my own attempt since it is heavily relying on several special Zeta Functions. However, first of all I will present my own solution. Starting with the series representation of $zeta(2)$ we get



$$begin{align*}
zeta(2)=sum_{n=1}^infty frac1{n^2}&=frac1{1^2}+frac1{2^2}+frac1{3^2}+sum_{n=1}^inftyfrac1{(4n)^2}+frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+2)^2}+frac1{(4n+3)^2}\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{4(2n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+3)^2}\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+frac14lambda(2)+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac12left[frac1{(2n+1)^2}-frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)^2}right]\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+frac14lambda(2)+frac12[lambda(2)-beta(2)]+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}\
therefore~sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}&=frac{15}{16}zeta(2)-frac34lambda(2)+frac12beta(2)\
&=frac{15}{16}zeta(2)-frac34frac34zeta(2)+frac12 G\&=frac1{16}pi^2+frac12 G
end{align*}$$




$$therefore~zetaleft(2,frac14right)~=~sum_{n=0}^inftyfrac1{left(n+frac14right)^2}~=~pi^2+8G$$




Where $zeta(s)$ dnotes the Riemann Zeta Function, $lambda(s)$ the Dirichlet Lambda Function, $beta(s)$ the Dirichlet Beta Function. Moreover the relation $lambda(s)=(1-2^{-s})zeta(s)$ and the well-known values $zeta(2)=frac{pi^2}6$ and $beta(2)=G$ were used.




I am suspicious about the heavy usage of the whole Zeta Function machinery and I am curious if there exists a shorter and more elegant way of proving $(1)$?




Thanks in advance!



EDIT



As Zacky pointed out within the comments this special value of the Hurwitz Zeta Function can also be interpreted as a particular value of the Trigamma Function hence in general we got a the following series expansion of the Polygamma Function



$$begin{align*}
psi^{(n)(z)}&=(-1)^{n+1}n!sum_{k=0}^inftyfrac1{(z+k)^{n+1}}\
&=(-1)^{n+1}n!zeta(n+1,z)
end{align*}$$



So for $n=1$ and $z=frac14$ it directly follows that



$$(-1)^{1+1}(1!)psi^{(1)}left(frac14right)=zetaleft(1+1,frac14right)Rightarrow psi^{(1)}left(frac14right)=zetaleft(2,frac14right)$$







alternative-proof zeta-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago







mrtaurho

















asked Jan 5 at 19:22









mrtaurhomrtaurho

4,07721133




4,07721133








  • 1




    Isn't this $psi_1 left(frac14right)$ (trigamma function)? See here: mathworld.wolfram.com/TrigammaFunction.html
    – Zacky
    Jan 5 at 19:24












  • @Zacky This is due the more general fact that $$psi^{(n)}(z)~=~(-1)^{n+1}n!zeta(n+1,z)$$ which can be shown directly with the series representation of both functions. But thank I you, I have forgotten about this relation.
    – mrtaurho
    Jan 5 at 19:28












  • I see, so basically the question is to prove that $psileft(frac14right) =pi^2 +8G$, right?
    – Zacky
    Jan 5 at 19:29










  • @Zacky Yes and no. Basically it is the same question, yes even though I am more interested in Zeta Functions at the moment.
    – mrtaurho
    Jan 5 at 19:30














  • 1




    Isn't this $psi_1 left(frac14right)$ (trigamma function)? See here: mathworld.wolfram.com/TrigammaFunction.html
    – Zacky
    Jan 5 at 19:24












  • @Zacky This is due the more general fact that $$psi^{(n)}(z)~=~(-1)^{n+1}n!zeta(n+1,z)$$ which can be shown directly with the series representation of both functions. But thank I you, I have forgotten about this relation.
    – mrtaurho
    Jan 5 at 19:28












  • I see, so basically the question is to prove that $psileft(frac14right) =pi^2 +8G$, right?
    – Zacky
    Jan 5 at 19:29










  • @Zacky Yes and no. Basically it is the same question, yes even though I am more interested in Zeta Functions at the moment.
    – mrtaurho
    Jan 5 at 19:30








1




1




Isn't this $psi_1 left(frac14right)$ (trigamma function)? See here: mathworld.wolfram.com/TrigammaFunction.html
– Zacky
Jan 5 at 19:24






Isn't this $psi_1 left(frac14right)$ (trigamma function)? See here: mathworld.wolfram.com/TrigammaFunction.html
– Zacky
Jan 5 at 19:24














@Zacky This is due the more general fact that $$psi^{(n)}(z)~=~(-1)^{n+1}n!zeta(n+1,z)$$ which can be shown directly with the series representation of both functions. But thank I you, I have forgotten about this relation.
– mrtaurho
Jan 5 at 19:28






@Zacky This is due the more general fact that $$psi^{(n)}(z)~=~(-1)^{n+1}n!zeta(n+1,z)$$ which can be shown directly with the series representation of both functions. But thank I you, I have forgotten about this relation.
– mrtaurho
Jan 5 at 19:28














I see, so basically the question is to prove that $psileft(frac14right) =pi^2 +8G$, right?
– Zacky
Jan 5 at 19:29




I see, so basically the question is to prove that $psileft(frac14right) =pi^2 +8G$, right?
– Zacky
Jan 5 at 19:29












@Zacky Yes and no. Basically it is the same question, yes even though I am more interested in Zeta Functions at the moment.
– mrtaurho
Jan 5 at 19:30




@Zacky Yes and no. Basically it is the same question, yes even though I am more interested in Zeta Functions at the moment.
– mrtaurho
Jan 5 at 19:30










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














We can use the following representation of the digamma function from here, namely:
$$psi(s+1)=-gamma+int_0^1 frac{1-x^s}{1-x}dxRightarrow psi_1(s+1)=int_0^1 frac{x^{s}ln x}{x-1}dx$$
Above follows since $frac{d}{dz}psi(z)=psi_1{(z)} $, so we can rewrite our desired value as:
$$psi_1left(frac14right)=int_0^1 frac{x^{1/4-1} ln x}{x-1}dx$$
Notice that $frac{d}{dx}left(4x^{frac{1}{4}}right)=x^{frac14-1}$, so we can easily substitute $x^{frac14}=tRightarrow x=t^4$ to get: $$psi_1left(frac14right)=16int_0^1 frac{ln t}{t^4-1}dt$$
We might already recall that we saw before something similar, $int_0^1 frac{ln x}{1+x^2}dx=-G$, thus let's try to get there.



$$frac{1}{x^4-1}=frac12 frac{(x^2+1)-(x^2-1)}{(x^2+1)(x^2-1)}=frac12 left(frac1{x^2-1}-frac{1}{x^2+1}right)$$
$$Rightarrow psi_1left(frac14right)=8int_0^1frac{ln t}{t^2-1}dt -8int_0^1 frac{ln t}{t^2+1}dt=boxed{pi^2 +8G}$$
I am pretty sure you can prove that the first integral equals to $frac{pi^2}{8}$, but here are found many proofs.






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Well done (+1) This is the kind of answer I had in mind while formulating my question. Okay, to be honest I was not thinking about the Trigamma Function since I had forgotten about this relation but anyway thank you.
    – mrtaurho
    2 days ago










  • ^_^ Now that I think of it, maybe it was more directly to use this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…, but I am more familiar with trigamma function than to Hurwitz's Zeta function.
    – Zacky
    2 days ago





















3














Inspired by Zacky's comment on the integral representation of the Hurwitz Zeta Function I have found another pretty straightforward way. First we notice that




$$zeta(s,q)~=~frac1{Gamma(s)}int_0^infty frac{t^{s-1}e^{-qt}}{1-e^{-t}}mathrm dttag1$$




Now substitute $s=2$ and $q=frac14$ followed by $u=e^{-t}$ to get



$$mathfrak I=int_0^{infty}frac{te^{-t/4}}{1-e^{-t}}mathrm dt=int_0^1frac{u^{1/4-1}cdot log(u)}{u-1}mathrm du$$



And now we are at the same point from where Zacky deduced the right value via well-known integrals. Hence his method was quite elegant I will not repeat his solution but just refer to it. Basically using $(1)$ does not force us to rely on the Trigamma Function but instead leaves us all along with the Hurwitz Zeta Function and some nice integrals.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063097%2falternative-proof-for-zeta-left2-frac14-right-psi1-left-frac14-right%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    We can use the following representation of the digamma function from here, namely:
    $$psi(s+1)=-gamma+int_0^1 frac{1-x^s}{1-x}dxRightarrow psi_1(s+1)=int_0^1 frac{x^{s}ln x}{x-1}dx$$
    Above follows since $frac{d}{dz}psi(z)=psi_1{(z)} $, so we can rewrite our desired value as:
    $$psi_1left(frac14right)=int_0^1 frac{x^{1/4-1} ln x}{x-1}dx$$
    Notice that $frac{d}{dx}left(4x^{frac{1}{4}}right)=x^{frac14-1}$, so we can easily substitute $x^{frac14}=tRightarrow x=t^4$ to get: $$psi_1left(frac14right)=16int_0^1 frac{ln t}{t^4-1}dt$$
    We might already recall that we saw before something similar, $int_0^1 frac{ln x}{1+x^2}dx=-G$, thus let's try to get there.



    $$frac{1}{x^4-1}=frac12 frac{(x^2+1)-(x^2-1)}{(x^2+1)(x^2-1)}=frac12 left(frac1{x^2-1}-frac{1}{x^2+1}right)$$
    $$Rightarrow psi_1left(frac14right)=8int_0^1frac{ln t}{t^2-1}dt -8int_0^1 frac{ln t}{t^2+1}dt=boxed{pi^2 +8G}$$
    I am pretty sure you can prove that the first integral equals to $frac{pi^2}{8}$, but here are found many proofs.






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Well done (+1) This is the kind of answer I had in mind while formulating my question. Okay, to be honest I was not thinking about the Trigamma Function since I had forgotten about this relation but anyway thank you.
      – mrtaurho
      2 days ago










    • ^_^ Now that I think of it, maybe it was more directly to use this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…, but I am more familiar with trigamma function than to Hurwitz's Zeta function.
      – Zacky
      2 days ago


















    3














    We can use the following representation of the digamma function from here, namely:
    $$psi(s+1)=-gamma+int_0^1 frac{1-x^s}{1-x}dxRightarrow psi_1(s+1)=int_0^1 frac{x^{s}ln x}{x-1}dx$$
    Above follows since $frac{d}{dz}psi(z)=psi_1{(z)} $, so we can rewrite our desired value as:
    $$psi_1left(frac14right)=int_0^1 frac{x^{1/4-1} ln x}{x-1}dx$$
    Notice that $frac{d}{dx}left(4x^{frac{1}{4}}right)=x^{frac14-1}$, so we can easily substitute $x^{frac14}=tRightarrow x=t^4$ to get: $$psi_1left(frac14right)=16int_0^1 frac{ln t}{t^4-1}dt$$
    We might already recall that we saw before something similar, $int_0^1 frac{ln x}{1+x^2}dx=-G$, thus let's try to get there.



    $$frac{1}{x^4-1}=frac12 frac{(x^2+1)-(x^2-1)}{(x^2+1)(x^2-1)}=frac12 left(frac1{x^2-1}-frac{1}{x^2+1}right)$$
    $$Rightarrow psi_1left(frac14right)=8int_0^1frac{ln t}{t^2-1}dt -8int_0^1 frac{ln t}{t^2+1}dt=boxed{pi^2 +8G}$$
    I am pretty sure you can prove that the first integral equals to $frac{pi^2}{8}$, but here are found many proofs.






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Well done (+1) This is the kind of answer I had in mind while formulating my question. Okay, to be honest I was not thinking about the Trigamma Function since I had forgotten about this relation but anyway thank you.
      – mrtaurho
      2 days ago










    • ^_^ Now that I think of it, maybe it was more directly to use this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…, but I am more familiar with trigamma function than to Hurwitz's Zeta function.
      – Zacky
      2 days ago
















    3












    3








    3






    We can use the following representation of the digamma function from here, namely:
    $$psi(s+1)=-gamma+int_0^1 frac{1-x^s}{1-x}dxRightarrow psi_1(s+1)=int_0^1 frac{x^{s}ln x}{x-1}dx$$
    Above follows since $frac{d}{dz}psi(z)=psi_1{(z)} $, so we can rewrite our desired value as:
    $$psi_1left(frac14right)=int_0^1 frac{x^{1/4-1} ln x}{x-1}dx$$
    Notice that $frac{d}{dx}left(4x^{frac{1}{4}}right)=x^{frac14-1}$, so we can easily substitute $x^{frac14}=tRightarrow x=t^4$ to get: $$psi_1left(frac14right)=16int_0^1 frac{ln t}{t^4-1}dt$$
    We might already recall that we saw before something similar, $int_0^1 frac{ln x}{1+x^2}dx=-G$, thus let's try to get there.



    $$frac{1}{x^4-1}=frac12 frac{(x^2+1)-(x^2-1)}{(x^2+1)(x^2-1)}=frac12 left(frac1{x^2-1}-frac{1}{x^2+1}right)$$
    $$Rightarrow psi_1left(frac14right)=8int_0^1frac{ln t}{t^2-1}dt -8int_0^1 frac{ln t}{t^2+1}dt=boxed{pi^2 +8G}$$
    I am pretty sure you can prove that the first integral equals to $frac{pi^2}{8}$, but here are found many proofs.






    share|cite|improve this answer












    We can use the following representation of the digamma function from here, namely:
    $$psi(s+1)=-gamma+int_0^1 frac{1-x^s}{1-x}dxRightarrow psi_1(s+1)=int_0^1 frac{x^{s}ln x}{x-1}dx$$
    Above follows since $frac{d}{dz}psi(z)=psi_1{(z)} $, so we can rewrite our desired value as:
    $$psi_1left(frac14right)=int_0^1 frac{x^{1/4-1} ln x}{x-1}dx$$
    Notice that $frac{d}{dx}left(4x^{frac{1}{4}}right)=x^{frac14-1}$, so we can easily substitute $x^{frac14}=tRightarrow x=t^4$ to get: $$psi_1left(frac14right)=16int_0^1 frac{ln t}{t^4-1}dt$$
    We might already recall that we saw before something similar, $int_0^1 frac{ln x}{1+x^2}dx=-G$, thus let's try to get there.



    $$frac{1}{x^4-1}=frac12 frac{(x^2+1)-(x^2-1)}{(x^2+1)(x^2-1)}=frac12 left(frac1{x^2-1}-frac{1}{x^2+1}right)$$
    $$Rightarrow psi_1left(frac14right)=8int_0^1frac{ln t}{t^2-1}dt -8int_0^1 frac{ln t}{t^2+1}dt=boxed{pi^2 +8G}$$
    I am pretty sure you can prove that the first integral equals to $frac{pi^2}{8}$, but here are found many proofs.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 2 days ago









    ZackyZacky

    5,2261752




    5,2261752








    • 1




      Well done (+1) This is the kind of answer I had in mind while formulating my question. Okay, to be honest I was not thinking about the Trigamma Function since I had forgotten about this relation but anyway thank you.
      – mrtaurho
      2 days ago










    • ^_^ Now that I think of it, maybe it was more directly to use this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…, but I am more familiar with trigamma function than to Hurwitz's Zeta function.
      – Zacky
      2 days ago
















    • 1




      Well done (+1) This is the kind of answer I had in mind while formulating my question. Okay, to be honest I was not thinking about the Trigamma Function since I had forgotten about this relation but anyway thank you.
      – mrtaurho
      2 days ago










    • ^_^ Now that I think of it, maybe it was more directly to use this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…, but I am more familiar with trigamma function than to Hurwitz's Zeta function.
      – Zacky
      2 days ago










    1




    1




    Well done (+1) This is the kind of answer I had in mind while formulating my question. Okay, to be honest I was not thinking about the Trigamma Function since I had forgotten about this relation but anyway thank you.
    – mrtaurho
    2 days ago




    Well done (+1) This is the kind of answer I had in mind while formulating my question. Okay, to be honest I was not thinking about the Trigamma Function since I had forgotten about this relation but anyway thank you.
    – mrtaurho
    2 days ago












    ^_^ Now that I think of it, maybe it was more directly to use this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…, but I am more familiar with trigamma function than to Hurwitz's Zeta function.
    – Zacky
    2 days ago






    ^_^ Now that I think of it, maybe it was more directly to use this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…, but I am more familiar with trigamma function than to Hurwitz's Zeta function.
    – Zacky
    2 days ago













    3














    Inspired by Zacky's comment on the integral representation of the Hurwitz Zeta Function I have found another pretty straightforward way. First we notice that




    $$zeta(s,q)~=~frac1{Gamma(s)}int_0^infty frac{t^{s-1}e^{-qt}}{1-e^{-t}}mathrm dttag1$$




    Now substitute $s=2$ and $q=frac14$ followed by $u=e^{-t}$ to get



    $$mathfrak I=int_0^{infty}frac{te^{-t/4}}{1-e^{-t}}mathrm dt=int_0^1frac{u^{1/4-1}cdot log(u)}{u-1}mathrm du$$



    And now we are at the same point from where Zacky deduced the right value via well-known integrals. Hence his method was quite elegant I will not repeat his solution but just refer to it. Basically using $(1)$ does not force us to rely on the Trigamma Function but instead leaves us all along with the Hurwitz Zeta Function and some nice integrals.






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      3














      Inspired by Zacky's comment on the integral representation of the Hurwitz Zeta Function I have found another pretty straightforward way. First we notice that




      $$zeta(s,q)~=~frac1{Gamma(s)}int_0^infty frac{t^{s-1}e^{-qt}}{1-e^{-t}}mathrm dttag1$$




      Now substitute $s=2$ and $q=frac14$ followed by $u=e^{-t}$ to get



      $$mathfrak I=int_0^{infty}frac{te^{-t/4}}{1-e^{-t}}mathrm dt=int_0^1frac{u^{1/4-1}cdot log(u)}{u-1}mathrm du$$



      And now we are at the same point from where Zacky deduced the right value via well-known integrals. Hence his method was quite elegant I will not repeat his solution but just refer to it. Basically using $(1)$ does not force us to rely on the Trigamma Function but instead leaves us all along with the Hurwitz Zeta Function and some nice integrals.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        3












        3








        3






        Inspired by Zacky's comment on the integral representation of the Hurwitz Zeta Function I have found another pretty straightforward way. First we notice that




        $$zeta(s,q)~=~frac1{Gamma(s)}int_0^infty frac{t^{s-1}e^{-qt}}{1-e^{-t}}mathrm dttag1$$




        Now substitute $s=2$ and $q=frac14$ followed by $u=e^{-t}$ to get



        $$mathfrak I=int_0^{infty}frac{te^{-t/4}}{1-e^{-t}}mathrm dt=int_0^1frac{u^{1/4-1}cdot log(u)}{u-1}mathrm du$$



        And now we are at the same point from where Zacky deduced the right value via well-known integrals. Hence his method was quite elegant I will not repeat his solution but just refer to it. Basically using $(1)$ does not force us to rely on the Trigamma Function but instead leaves us all along with the Hurwitz Zeta Function and some nice integrals.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Inspired by Zacky's comment on the integral representation of the Hurwitz Zeta Function I have found another pretty straightforward way. First we notice that




        $$zeta(s,q)~=~frac1{Gamma(s)}int_0^infty frac{t^{s-1}e^{-qt}}{1-e^{-t}}mathrm dttag1$$




        Now substitute $s=2$ and $q=frac14$ followed by $u=e^{-t}$ to get



        $$mathfrak I=int_0^{infty}frac{te^{-t/4}}{1-e^{-t}}mathrm dt=int_0^1frac{u^{1/4-1}cdot log(u)}{u-1}mathrm du$$



        And now we are at the same point from where Zacky deduced the right value via well-known integrals. Hence his method was quite elegant I will not repeat his solution but just refer to it. Basically using $(1)$ does not force us to rely on the Trigamma Function but instead leaves us all along with the Hurwitz Zeta Function and some nice integrals.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited yesterday

























        answered 2 days ago









        mrtaurhomrtaurho

        4,07721133




        4,07721133






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063097%2falternative-proof-for-zeta-left2-frac14-right-psi1-left-frac14-right%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Mario Kart Wii

            What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

            Antonio Litta Visconti Arese