Exercise 3.30 from Görtz-Wedhorn: local affine algebras
Here's the Exercise 3.30 from the textbook of Görtz and Wedhorn:
Let $k$ be a field, and let $A$ be a local $k$-algebra of finite type.
Prove that $operatorname{Spec} A$ consists of a single point, and
that $A$ is finite-dimensional as a $k$-vector space. In particular
$A$ is a local Artin ring (why?), and $kappa (A)/k$ is a finite field
extension.
I see how this follows from some well-known results:
Every finitely generated algebra over a Jacobson ring is Jacobson, so that $A$ is Jacobson. As $A$ is local, this amounts to saying that its maximal ideal is the only prime ideal.
In general, for every maximal ideal $mathfrak{m}$ in a finitely generated $k$-algebra $A$, the extension $kappa (mathfrak{m})/k$ is finite (which follows again from the general results about Jacobson rings).
A ring is Artinian iff it is Noetherian and every prime ideal is maximal, which is the case here.
A finitely generated $k$-algebra is Artinian iff it is finite (Atiyah-Macdonald, Exercise 8.3).
However, all this seems to be an overkill, and I think the authors had in mind some direct argument for the very special case when $A$ is local. Do you see one?
commutative-algebra
New contributor
add a comment |
Here's the Exercise 3.30 from the textbook of Görtz and Wedhorn:
Let $k$ be a field, and let $A$ be a local $k$-algebra of finite type.
Prove that $operatorname{Spec} A$ consists of a single point, and
that $A$ is finite-dimensional as a $k$-vector space. In particular
$A$ is a local Artin ring (why?), and $kappa (A)/k$ is a finite field
extension.
I see how this follows from some well-known results:
Every finitely generated algebra over a Jacobson ring is Jacobson, so that $A$ is Jacobson. As $A$ is local, this amounts to saying that its maximal ideal is the only prime ideal.
In general, for every maximal ideal $mathfrak{m}$ in a finitely generated $k$-algebra $A$, the extension $kappa (mathfrak{m})/k$ is finite (which follows again from the general results about Jacobson rings).
A ring is Artinian iff it is Noetherian and every prime ideal is maximal, which is the case here.
A finitely generated $k$-algebra is Artinian iff it is finite (Atiyah-Macdonald, Exercise 8.3).
However, all this seems to be an overkill, and I think the authors had in mind some direct argument for the very special case when $A$ is local. Do you see one?
commutative-algebra
New contributor
Just an opinion, but this doesn't seem like overkill to me.
– RghtHndSd
2 days ago
add a comment |
Here's the Exercise 3.30 from the textbook of Görtz and Wedhorn:
Let $k$ be a field, and let $A$ be a local $k$-algebra of finite type.
Prove that $operatorname{Spec} A$ consists of a single point, and
that $A$ is finite-dimensional as a $k$-vector space. In particular
$A$ is a local Artin ring (why?), and $kappa (A)/k$ is a finite field
extension.
I see how this follows from some well-known results:
Every finitely generated algebra over a Jacobson ring is Jacobson, so that $A$ is Jacobson. As $A$ is local, this amounts to saying that its maximal ideal is the only prime ideal.
In general, for every maximal ideal $mathfrak{m}$ in a finitely generated $k$-algebra $A$, the extension $kappa (mathfrak{m})/k$ is finite (which follows again from the general results about Jacobson rings).
A ring is Artinian iff it is Noetherian and every prime ideal is maximal, which is the case here.
A finitely generated $k$-algebra is Artinian iff it is finite (Atiyah-Macdonald, Exercise 8.3).
However, all this seems to be an overkill, and I think the authors had in mind some direct argument for the very special case when $A$ is local. Do you see one?
commutative-algebra
New contributor
Here's the Exercise 3.30 from the textbook of Görtz and Wedhorn:
Let $k$ be a field, and let $A$ be a local $k$-algebra of finite type.
Prove that $operatorname{Spec} A$ consists of a single point, and
that $A$ is finite-dimensional as a $k$-vector space. In particular
$A$ is a local Artin ring (why?), and $kappa (A)/k$ is a finite field
extension.
I see how this follows from some well-known results:
Every finitely generated algebra over a Jacobson ring is Jacobson, so that $A$ is Jacobson. As $A$ is local, this amounts to saying that its maximal ideal is the only prime ideal.
In general, for every maximal ideal $mathfrak{m}$ in a finitely generated $k$-algebra $A$, the extension $kappa (mathfrak{m})/k$ is finite (which follows again from the general results about Jacobson rings).
A ring is Artinian iff it is Noetherian and every prime ideal is maximal, which is the case here.
A finitely generated $k$-algebra is Artinian iff it is finite (Atiyah-Macdonald, Exercise 8.3).
However, all this seems to be an overkill, and I think the authors had in mind some direct argument for the very special case when $A$ is local. Do you see one?
commutative-algebra
commutative-algebra
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 2 days ago
user632025user632025
61
61
New contributor
New contributor
Just an opinion, but this doesn't seem like overkill to me.
– RghtHndSd
2 days ago
add a comment |
Just an opinion, but this doesn't seem like overkill to me.
– RghtHndSd
2 days ago
Just an opinion, but this doesn't seem like overkill to me.
– RghtHndSd
2 days ago
Just an opinion, but this doesn't seem like overkill to me.
– RghtHndSd
2 days ago
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
user632025 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063173%2fexercise-3-30-from-g%25c3%25b6rtz-wedhorn-local-affine-algebras%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
user632025 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user632025 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user632025 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
user632025 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063173%2fexercise-3-30-from-g%25c3%25b6rtz-wedhorn-local-affine-algebras%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Just an opinion, but this doesn't seem like overkill to me.
– RghtHndSd
2 days ago