How to simplify $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))}$? [closed]
$begingroup$
Thanks to the rules of parenthesis in exponents, $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))}$ has a huge number of parenthesis.
How do you simplify this so you wouldn't have to write $))))))$ at the end of a math problem?
algebra-precalculus exponentiation
$endgroup$
closed as unclear what you're asking by Did, Don Thousand, José Carlos Santos, metamorphy, Adrian Keister Jan 26 at 19:22
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks to the rules of parenthesis in exponents, $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))}$ has a huge number of parenthesis.
How do you simplify this so you wouldn't have to write $))))))$ at the end of a math problem?
algebra-precalculus exponentiation
$endgroup$
closed as unclear what you're asking by Did, Don Thousand, José Carlos Santos, metamorphy, Adrian Keister Jan 26 at 19:22
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
$begingroup$
If you are working in a normal context, You don't need any of the parentheses thanks to commutativity. If you are working in a weird group, that's another story...
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Jan 25 at 23:43
$begingroup$
What is this "rule of parentheses in exponents"?
$endgroup$
– kccu
Jan 25 at 23:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks to the rules of parenthesis in exponents, $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))}$ has a huge number of parenthesis.
How do you simplify this so you wouldn't have to write $))))))$ at the end of a math problem?
algebra-precalculus exponentiation
$endgroup$
Thanks to the rules of parenthesis in exponents, $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))}$ has a huge number of parenthesis.
How do you simplify this so you wouldn't have to write $))))))$ at the end of a math problem?
algebra-precalculus exponentiation
algebra-precalculus exponentiation
edited Jan 26 at 0:10
LukeyBear
asked Jan 25 at 23:38
LukeyBearLukeyBear
84
84
closed as unclear what you're asking by Did, Don Thousand, José Carlos Santos, metamorphy, Adrian Keister Jan 26 at 19:22
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as unclear what you're asking by Did, Don Thousand, José Carlos Santos, metamorphy, Adrian Keister Jan 26 at 19:22
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
$begingroup$
If you are working in a normal context, You don't need any of the parentheses thanks to commutativity. If you are working in a weird group, that's another story...
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Jan 25 at 23:43
$begingroup$
What is this "rule of parentheses in exponents"?
$endgroup$
– kccu
Jan 25 at 23:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you are working in a normal context, You don't need any of the parentheses thanks to commutativity. If you are working in a weird group, that's another story...
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Jan 25 at 23:43
$begingroup$
What is this "rule of parentheses in exponents"?
$endgroup$
– kccu
Jan 25 at 23:44
$begingroup$
If you are working in a normal context, You don't need any of the parentheses thanks to commutativity. If you are working in a weird group, that's another story...
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Jan 25 at 23:43
$begingroup$
If you are working in a normal context, You don't need any of the parentheses thanks to commutativity. If you are working in a weird group, that's another story...
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Jan 25 at 23:43
$begingroup$
What is this "rule of parentheses in exponents"?
$endgroup$
– kccu
Jan 25 at 23:44
$begingroup$
What is this "rule of parentheses in exponents"?
$endgroup$
– kccu
Jan 25 at 23:44
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))} = 2^{(3+4+5+6+7+8)} = 2^{33}$. The only set of parantheses needed is the outermost one, to imply that you do the addition before you do the exponentiation.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
And even the outer ones aren't really needed since they're implied by the fact the whole exponent is one superscript!
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Jan 26 at 1:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))) = 3+4+5+6+7+8 = 33$
Therefore, $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))} = 2^{33}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Addition is associative so in your case, we have:
$$2^{(3+(4+(5+(6))))}=2^{(3+4+5+6)}$$
No need for an inordinate number of parentheses here.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This would be identical to simply simplifying the exponent.
So what would an equivalent expression be for the exponent, i.e. what does
$$(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8)))))))$$
equal? (Or the sum with the numbers up to $6$, you have two different expressions in the question.) Obviously it would just be the sum of these numbers, right? Thus, you can just substitute the sum into the exponent. (This applies to either one.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To combat this kind of problem when typesetting documents, we often either just evaluate the exponent (like Mike suggested), or use dots, like $2(3+(4+(5+cdots+20(21))))$. Alternatively, I've seen people use $)cdots)$, but that's exceedingly rare. If working in a context when you have commutativity and associativity though, the first option is probably the way to go.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))} = 2^{(3+4+5+6+7+8)} = 2^{33}$. The only set of parantheses needed is the outermost one, to imply that you do the addition before you do the exponentiation.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
And even the outer ones aren't really needed since they're implied by the fact the whole exponent is one superscript!
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Jan 26 at 1:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))} = 2^{(3+4+5+6+7+8)} = 2^{33}$. The only set of parantheses needed is the outermost one, to imply that you do the addition before you do the exponentiation.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
And even the outer ones aren't really needed since they're implied by the fact the whole exponent is one superscript!
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Jan 26 at 1:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))} = 2^{(3+4+5+6+7+8)} = 2^{33}$. The only set of parantheses needed is the outermost one, to imply that you do the addition before you do the exponentiation.
$endgroup$
$2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))} = 2^{(3+4+5+6+7+8)} = 2^{33}$. The only set of parantheses needed is the outermost one, to imply that you do the addition before you do the exponentiation.
edited Jan 25 at 23:46
NicNic8
4,63831123
4,63831123
answered Jan 25 at 23:43
MikeMike
4,386412
4,386412
1
$begingroup$
And even the outer ones aren't really needed since they're implied by the fact the whole exponent is one superscript!
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Jan 26 at 1:07
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
And even the outer ones aren't really needed since they're implied by the fact the whole exponent is one superscript!
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Jan 26 at 1:07
1
1
$begingroup$
And even the outer ones aren't really needed since they're implied by the fact the whole exponent is one superscript!
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Jan 26 at 1:07
$begingroup$
And even the outer ones aren't really needed since they're implied by the fact the whole exponent is one superscript!
$endgroup$
– timtfj
Jan 26 at 1:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))) = 3+4+5+6+7+8 = 33$
Therefore, $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))} = 2^{33}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))) = 3+4+5+6+7+8 = 33$
Therefore, $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))} = 2^{33}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))) = 3+4+5+6+7+8 = 33$
Therefore, $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))} = 2^{33}$.
$endgroup$
$3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))) = 3+4+5+6+7+8 = 33$
Therefore, $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))} = 2^{33}$.
edited Jan 26 at 0:10
answered Jan 25 at 23:44
NicNic8NicNic8
4,63831123
4,63831123
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Addition is associative so in your case, we have:
$$2^{(3+(4+(5+(6))))}=2^{(3+4+5+6)}$$
No need for an inordinate number of parentheses here.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Addition is associative so in your case, we have:
$$2^{(3+(4+(5+(6))))}=2^{(3+4+5+6)}$$
No need for an inordinate number of parentheses here.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Addition is associative so in your case, we have:
$$2^{(3+(4+(5+(6))))}=2^{(3+4+5+6)}$$
No need for an inordinate number of parentheses here.
$endgroup$
Addition is associative so in your case, we have:
$$2^{(3+(4+(5+(6))))}=2^{(3+4+5+6)}$$
No need for an inordinate number of parentheses here.
edited Jan 26 at 0:55
answered Jan 25 at 23:45
GnumbertesterGnumbertester
672114
672114
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This would be identical to simply simplifying the exponent.
So what would an equivalent expression be for the exponent, i.e. what does
$$(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8)))))))$$
equal? (Or the sum with the numbers up to $6$, you have two different expressions in the question.) Obviously it would just be the sum of these numbers, right? Thus, you can just substitute the sum into the exponent. (This applies to either one.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This would be identical to simply simplifying the exponent.
So what would an equivalent expression be for the exponent, i.e. what does
$$(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8)))))))$$
equal? (Or the sum with the numbers up to $6$, you have two different expressions in the question.) Obviously it would just be the sum of these numbers, right? Thus, you can just substitute the sum into the exponent. (This applies to either one.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This would be identical to simply simplifying the exponent.
So what would an equivalent expression be for the exponent, i.e. what does
$$(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8)))))))$$
equal? (Or the sum with the numbers up to $6$, you have two different expressions in the question.) Obviously it would just be the sum of these numbers, right? Thus, you can just substitute the sum into the exponent. (This applies to either one.)
$endgroup$
This would be identical to simply simplifying the exponent.
So what would an equivalent expression be for the exponent, i.e. what does
$$(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8)))))))$$
equal? (Or the sum with the numbers up to $6$, you have two different expressions in the question.) Obviously it would just be the sum of these numbers, right? Thus, you can just substitute the sum into the exponent. (This applies to either one.)
answered Jan 25 at 23:44
Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer
7,82421339
7,82421339
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To combat this kind of problem when typesetting documents, we often either just evaluate the exponent (like Mike suggested), or use dots, like $2(3+(4+(5+cdots+20(21))))$. Alternatively, I've seen people use $)cdots)$, but that's exceedingly rare. If working in a context when you have commutativity and associativity though, the first option is probably the way to go.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To combat this kind of problem when typesetting documents, we often either just evaluate the exponent (like Mike suggested), or use dots, like $2(3+(4+(5+cdots+20(21))))$. Alternatively, I've seen people use $)cdots)$, but that's exceedingly rare. If working in a context when you have commutativity and associativity though, the first option is probably the way to go.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To combat this kind of problem when typesetting documents, we often either just evaluate the exponent (like Mike suggested), or use dots, like $2(3+(4+(5+cdots+20(21))))$. Alternatively, I've seen people use $)cdots)$, but that's exceedingly rare. If working in a context when you have commutativity and associativity though, the first option is probably the way to go.
$endgroup$
To combat this kind of problem when typesetting documents, we often either just evaluate the exponent (like Mike suggested), or use dots, like $2(3+(4+(5+cdots+20(21))))$. Alternatively, I've seen people use $)cdots)$, but that's exceedingly rare. If working in a context when you have commutativity and associativity though, the first option is probably the way to go.
answered Jan 25 at 23:46
YiFanYiFan
4,7111727
4,7111727
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you are working in a normal context, You don't need any of the parentheses thanks to commutativity. If you are working in a weird group, that's another story...
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Jan 25 at 23:43
$begingroup$
What is this "rule of parentheses in exponents"?
$endgroup$
– kccu
Jan 25 at 23:44