How to simplify $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))}$? [closed]












0












$begingroup$


Thanks to the rules of parenthesis in exponents, $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))}$ has a huge number of parenthesis.



How do you simplify this so you wouldn't have to write $))))))$ at the end of a math problem?






algebra-precalculus exponentiation







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as unclear what you're asking by Did, Don Thousand, José Carlos Santos, metamorphy, Adrian Keister Jan 26 at 19:22


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


















  • $begingroup$
    If you are working in a normal context, You don't need any of the parentheses thanks to commutativity. If you are working in a weird group, that's another story...
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    Jan 25 at 23:43










  • $begingroup$
    What is this "rule of parentheses in exponents"?
    $endgroup$
    – kccu
    Jan 25 at 23:44
















0












$begingroup$


Thanks to the rules of parenthesis in exponents, $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))}$ has a huge number of parenthesis.



How do you simplify this so you wouldn't have to write $))))))$ at the end of a math problem?






algebra-precalculus exponentiation







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as unclear what you're asking by Did, Don Thousand, José Carlos Santos, metamorphy, Adrian Keister Jan 26 at 19:22


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


















  • $begingroup$
    If you are working in a normal context, You don't need any of the parentheses thanks to commutativity. If you are working in a weird group, that's another story...
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    Jan 25 at 23:43










  • $begingroup$
    What is this "rule of parentheses in exponents"?
    $endgroup$
    – kccu
    Jan 25 at 23:44














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Thanks to the rules of parenthesis in exponents, $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))}$ has a huge number of parenthesis.



How do you simplify this so you wouldn't have to write $))))))$ at the end of a math problem?






algebra-precalculus exponentiation







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Thanks to the rules of parenthesis in exponents, $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))}$ has a huge number of parenthesis.



How do you simplify this so you wouldn't have to write $))))))$ at the end of a math problem?






algebra-precalculus exponentiation




algebra-precalculus exponentiation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 26 at 0:10







LukeyBear

















asked Jan 25 at 23:38









LukeyBearLukeyBear

84




84




closed as unclear what you're asking by Did, Don Thousand, José Carlos Santos, metamorphy, Adrian Keister Jan 26 at 19:22


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









closed as unclear what you're asking by Did, Don Thousand, José Carlos Santos, metamorphy, Adrian Keister Jan 26 at 19:22


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • $begingroup$
    If you are working in a normal context, You don't need any of the parentheses thanks to commutativity. If you are working in a weird group, that's another story...
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    Jan 25 at 23:43










  • $begingroup$
    What is this "rule of parentheses in exponents"?
    $endgroup$
    – kccu
    Jan 25 at 23:44


















  • $begingroup$
    If you are working in a normal context, You don't need any of the parentheses thanks to commutativity. If you are working in a weird group, that's another story...
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    Jan 25 at 23:43










  • $begingroup$
    What is this "rule of parentheses in exponents"?
    $endgroup$
    – kccu
    Jan 25 at 23:44
















$begingroup$
If you are working in a normal context, You don't need any of the parentheses thanks to commutativity. If you are working in a weird group, that's another story...
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Jan 25 at 23:43




$begingroup$
If you are working in a normal context, You don't need any of the parentheses thanks to commutativity. If you are working in a weird group, that's another story...
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Jan 25 at 23:43












$begingroup$
What is this "rule of parentheses in exponents"?
$endgroup$
– kccu
Jan 25 at 23:44




$begingroup$
What is this "rule of parentheses in exponents"?
$endgroup$
– kccu
Jan 25 at 23:44










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

$2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))} = 2^{(3+4+5+6+7+8)} = 2^{33}$. The only set of parantheses needed is the outermost one, to imply that you do the addition before you do the exponentiation.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And even the outer ones aren't really needed since they're implied by the fact the whole exponent is one superscript!
    $endgroup$
    – timtfj
    Jan 26 at 1:07



















2












$begingroup$

$3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))) = 3+4+5+6+7+8 = 33$



Therefore, $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))} = 2^{33}$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    Addition is associative so in your case, we have:



    $$2^{(3+(4+(5+(6))))}=2^{(3+4+5+6)}$$



    No need for an inordinate number of parentheses here.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$





















      1












      $begingroup$

      This would be identical to simply simplifying the exponent.



      So what would an equivalent expression be for the exponent, i.e. what does



      $$(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8)))))))$$



      equal? (Or the sum with the numbers up to $6$, you have two different expressions in the question.) Obviously it would just be the sum of these numbers, right? Thus, you can just substitute the sum into the exponent. (This applies to either one.)






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$





















        1












        $begingroup$

        To combat this kind of problem when typesetting documents, we often either just evaluate the exponent (like Mike suggested), or use dots, like $2(3+(4+(5+cdots+20(21))))$. Alternatively, I've seen people use $)cdots)$, but that's exceedingly rare. If working in a context when you have commutativity and associativity though, the first option is probably the way to go.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$




















          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes








          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))} = 2^{(3+4+5+6+7+8)} = 2^{33}$. The only set of parantheses needed is the outermost one, to imply that you do the addition before you do the exponentiation.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            And even the outer ones aren't really needed since they're implied by the fact the whole exponent is one superscript!
            $endgroup$
            – timtfj
            Jan 26 at 1:07
















          3












          $begingroup$

          $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))} = 2^{(3+4+5+6+7+8)} = 2^{33}$. The only set of parantheses needed is the outermost one, to imply that you do the addition before you do the exponentiation.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            And even the outer ones aren't really needed since they're implied by the fact the whole exponent is one superscript!
            $endgroup$
            – timtfj
            Jan 26 at 1:07














          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))} = 2^{(3+4+5+6+7+8)} = 2^{33}$. The only set of parantheses needed is the outermost one, to imply that you do the addition before you do the exponentiation.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))} = 2^{(3+4+5+6+7+8)} = 2^{33}$. The only set of parantheses needed is the outermost one, to imply that you do the addition before you do the exponentiation.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 25 at 23:46









          NicNic8

          4,63831123




          4,63831123










          answered Jan 25 at 23:43









          MikeMike

          4,386412




          4,386412








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            And even the outer ones aren't really needed since they're implied by the fact the whole exponent is one superscript!
            $endgroup$
            – timtfj
            Jan 26 at 1:07














          • 1




            $begingroup$
            And even the outer ones aren't really needed since they're implied by the fact the whole exponent is one superscript!
            $endgroup$
            – timtfj
            Jan 26 at 1:07








          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          And even the outer ones aren't really needed since they're implied by the fact the whole exponent is one superscript!
          $endgroup$
          – timtfj
          Jan 26 at 1:07




          $begingroup$
          And even the outer ones aren't really needed since they're implied by the fact the whole exponent is one superscript!
          $endgroup$
          – timtfj
          Jan 26 at 1:07











          2












          $begingroup$

          $3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))) = 3+4+5+6+7+8 = 33$



          Therefore, $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))} = 2^{33}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$


















            2












            $begingroup$

            $3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))) = 3+4+5+6+7+8 = 33$



            Therefore, $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))} = 2^{33}$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$
















              2












              2








              2





              $begingroup$

              $3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))) = 3+4+5+6+7+8 = 33$



              Therefore, $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))} = 2^{33}$.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              $3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))) = 3+4+5+6+7+8 = 33$



              Therefore, $2^{(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8))))))} = 2^{33}$.







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited Jan 26 at 0:10

























              answered Jan 25 at 23:44









              NicNic8NicNic8

              4,63831123




              4,63831123























                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  Addition is associative so in your case, we have:



                  $$2^{(3+(4+(5+(6))))}=2^{(3+4+5+6)}$$



                  No need for an inordinate number of parentheses here.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$


















                    2












                    $begingroup$

                    Addition is associative so in your case, we have:



                    $$2^{(3+(4+(5+(6))))}=2^{(3+4+5+6)}$$



                    No need for an inordinate number of parentheses here.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$
















                      2












                      2








                      2





                      $begingroup$

                      Addition is associative so in your case, we have:



                      $$2^{(3+(4+(5+(6))))}=2^{(3+4+5+6)}$$



                      No need for an inordinate number of parentheses here.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      Addition is associative so in your case, we have:



                      $$2^{(3+(4+(5+(6))))}=2^{(3+4+5+6)}$$



                      No need for an inordinate number of parentheses here.







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      edited Jan 26 at 0:55

























                      answered Jan 25 at 23:45









                      GnumbertesterGnumbertester

                      672114




                      672114























                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          This would be identical to simply simplifying the exponent.



                          So what would an equivalent expression be for the exponent, i.e. what does



                          $$(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8)))))))$$



                          equal? (Or the sum with the numbers up to $6$, you have two different expressions in the question.) Obviously it would just be the sum of these numbers, right? Thus, you can just substitute the sum into the exponent. (This applies to either one.)






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$


















                            1












                            $begingroup$

                            This would be identical to simply simplifying the exponent.



                            So what would an equivalent expression be for the exponent, i.e. what does



                            $$(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8)))))))$$



                            equal? (Or the sum with the numbers up to $6$, you have two different expressions in the question.) Obviously it would just be the sum of these numbers, right? Thus, you can just substitute the sum into the exponent. (This applies to either one.)






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$
















                              1












                              1








                              1





                              $begingroup$

                              This would be identical to simply simplifying the exponent.



                              So what would an equivalent expression be for the exponent, i.e. what does



                              $$(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8)))))))$$



                              equal? (Or the sum with the numbers up to $6$, you have two different expressions in the question.) Obviously it would just be the sum of these numbers, right? Thus, you can just substitute the sum into the exponent. (This applies to either one.)






                              share|cite|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              This would be identical to simply simplifying the exponent.



                              So what would an equivalent expression be for the exponent, i.e. what does



                              $$(3+(4+(5+(6+(7+(8)))))))$$



                              equal? (Or the sum with the numbers up to $6$, you have two different expressions in the question.) Obviously it would just be the sum of these numbers, right? Thus, you can just substitute the sum into the exponent. (This applies to either one.)







                              share|cite|improve this answer












                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer










                              answered Jan 25 at 23:44









                              Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer

                              7,82421339




                              7,82421339























                                  1












                                  $begingroup$

                                  To combat this kind of problem when typesetting documents, we often either just evaluate the exponent (like Mike suggested), or use dots, like $2(3+(4+(5+cdots+20(21))))$. Alternatively, I've seen people use $)cdots)$, but that's exceedingly rare. If working in a context when you have commutativity and associativity though, the first option is probably the way to go.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$


















                                    1












                                    $begingroup$

                                    To combat this kind of problem when typesetting documents, we often either just evaluate the exponent (like Mike suggested), or use dots, like $2(3+(4+(5+cdots+20(21))))$. Alternatively, I've seen people use $)cdots)$, but that's exceedingly rare. If working in a context when you have commutativity and associativity though, the first option is probably the way to go.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$
















                                      1












                                      1








                                      1





                                      $begingroup$

                                      To combat this kind of problem when typesetting documents, we often either just evaluate the exponent (like Mike suggested), or use dots, like $2(3+(4+(5+cdots+20(21))))$. Alternatively, I've seen people use $)cdots)$, but that's exceedingly rare. If working in a context when you have commutativity and associativity though, the first option is probably the way to go.






                                      share|cite|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$



                                      To combat this kind of problem when typesetting documents, we often either just evaluate the exponent (like Mike suggested), or use dots, like $2(3+(4+(5+cdots+20(21))))$. Alternatively, I've seen people use $)cdots)$, but that's exceedingly rare. If working in a context when you have commutativity and associativity though, the first option is probably the way to go.







                                      share|cite|improve this answer












                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                      share|cite|improve this answer










                                      answered Jan 25 at 23:46









                                      YiFanYiFan

                                      4,7111727




                                      4,7111727















                                          -

                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Mario Kart Wii

                                          Image
                                          Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! Mario Kart Wii From The Cutting Room Floor Jump to: navigation, search Mario Kart Wii Developer : Nintendo Publisher : Nintendo Platform : Wii Released in JP : April 10, 2008 Released in US : April 27, 2008 Released in EU : April 11, 2008 Released in AU : April 24, 2008 Released in KR : April 30, 2009 This game has unused animations. This game has unused areas. This game has unused code. This game has unused objects. This game has unused modes / minigames. This game has unused graphics. This game has unused models. This game has unused items. This game has unused music. This game has regional differences. This game has a notes page This game has a prerelease article Mario Kart Wii is the sixth game in the series (not counting Arcade editions), which intro
                                          Read more

                                          What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

                                          Image
                                          5 Does "Dominus providebit" mean "The Lord will provide" or "The Lord provides"? I once had a bit of an argument with a guy who studied Latin over that. It's an inscription that appears on the rim of some old Swiss coins that I have. meaning latin-to-english-translation grammar-identification share | improve this question edited Jan 18 at 15:27 V2Blast 105 4 asked Jan 17 at 22:49 Donald K. Donald K. 26 1
                                          Read more

                                          Antonio Litta Visconti Arese

                                          Image
                                          Antonio Litta Visconti Arese I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò In carica 1797 – 1820 Predecessore Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Successore Alfonso Litta Visconti Arese Trattamento Sua grazia Altri titoli Duca Litta Conte del Regno napoleonico d'Italia Patrizio milanese Don Nascita Milano, 2 maggio 1748 Morte Milano, 14 agosto 1820 Dinastia Litta Visconti Arese Padre Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Madre Maria Elisabetta Visconti Borromeo Consorte Barbara Barbiano di Belgioioso Religione cattolicesimo Antonio Litta Visconti Arese , I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò (Milano, 2 maggio 1748 – Milano, 14 agosto 1820), è stato un nobile e politico italiano. Composizione "Il pastore svizzero" di Pietro Morlacchi, con dedica Indice 1 Biografia 2 Onorificenze 3 Araldica 4 Albero genealogico 5 Note 6 Altri progetti Biografia | Antonio Litta Visco
                                          Read more