Why can we not establish the irrationality of Catalan's constant the same way as $zeta(3)$?
$begingroup$
One of the main ingredients in Apéry's proof of the irrationality of $zeta(3)$ is the existence of the fast-converging series:
$$
{displaystyle {begin{aligned}zeta (3)&={frac {5}{2}}sum _{k=1}^{infty }{frac {(-1)^{k-1}}{{binom {2k}{k}}k^{3}}}end{aligned}}}.
$$
Despite numerous attempts, no similar expressions were found for other values of the Riemann $zeta$-function at positive odd integers.
For Catalan's constant, however, we do have such an expression, namely:
$${displaystyle G={frac {pi }{8}}log left(2+{sqrt {3}}right)+{frac {3}{8}}sum _{n=0}^{infty }{frac {1}{(2n+1)^{2}{binom {2n}{n}}}}.}$$
Why is this not sufficient for applying an Apéry-like method for proving its irrationality?
irrational-numbers riemann-zeta irrationality-measure
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One of the main ingredients in Apéry's proof of the irrationality of $zeta(3)$ is the existence of the fast-converging series:
$$
{displaystyle {begin{aligned}zeta (3)&={frac {5}{2}}sum _{k=1}^{infty }{frac {(-1)^{k-1}}{{binom {2k}{k}}k^{3}}}end{aligned}}}.
$$
Despite numerous attempts, no similar expressions were found for other values of the Riemann $zeta$-function at positive odd integers.
For Catalan's constant, however, we do have such an expression, namely:
$${displaystyle G={frac {pi }{8}}log left(2+{sqrt {3}}right)+{frac {3}{8}}sum _{n=0}^{infty }{frac {1}{(2n+1)^{2}{binom {2n}{n}}}}.}$$
Why is this not sufficient for applying an Apéry-like method for proving its irrationality?
irrational-numbers riemann-zeta irrationality-measure
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Having such an expression is by no means the same as irrationality. It is not clear how to adapt Apery's proof.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Oct 8 '18 at 12:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One of the main ingredients in Apéry's proof of the irrationality of $zeta(3)$ is the existence of the fast-converging series:
$$
{displaystyle {begin{aligned}zeta (3)&={frac {5}{2}}sum _{k=1}^{infty }{frac {(-1)^{k-1}}{{binom {2k}{k}}k^{3}}}end{aligned}}}.
$$
Despite numerous attempts, no similar expressions were found for other values of the Riemann $zeta$-function at positive odd integers.
For Catalan's constant, however, we do have such an expression, namely:
$${displaystyle G={frac {pi }{8}}log left(2+{sqrt {3}}right)+{frac {3}{8}}sum _{n=0}^{infty }{frac {1}{(2n+1)^{2}{binom {2n}{n}}}}.}$$
Why is this not sufficient for applying an Apéry-like method for proving its irrationality?
irrational-numbers riemann-zeta irrationality-measure
$endgroup$
One of the main ingredients in Apéry's proof of the irrationality of $zeta(3)$ is the existence of the fast-converging series:
$$
{displaystyle {begin{aligned}zeta (3)&={frac {5}{2}}sum _{k=1}^{infty }{frac {(-1)^{k-1}}{{binom {2k}{k}}k^{3}}}end{aligned}}}.
$$
Despite numerous attempts, no similar expressions were found for other values of the Riemann $zeta$-function at positive odd integers.
For Catalan's constant, however, we do have such an expression, namely:
$${displaystyle G={frac {pi }{8}}log left(2+{sqrt {3}}right)+{frac {3}{8}}sum _{n=0}^{infty }{frac {1}{(2n+1)^{2}{binom {2n}{n}}}}.}$$
Why is this not sufficient for applying an Apéry-like method for proving its irrationality?
irrational-numbers riemann-zeta irrationality-measure
irrational-numbers riemann-zeta irrationality-measure
edited Jan 21 at 17:12
Tito Piezas III
27.3k366174
27.3k366174
asked Oct 8 '18 at 12:37
KlangenKlangen
1,75811334
1,75811334
2
$begingroup$
Having such an expression is by no means the same as irrationality. It is not clear how to adapt Apery's proof.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Oct 8 '18 at 12:42
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Having such an expression is by no means the same as irrationality. It is not clear how to adapt Apery's proof.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Oct 8 '18 at 12:42
2
2
$begingroup$
Having such an expression is by no means the same as irrationality. It is not clear how to adapt Apery's proof.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Oct 8 '18 at 12:42
$begingroup$
Having such an expression is by no means the same as irrationality. It is not clear how to adapt Apery's proof.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Oct 8 '18 at 12:42
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2947004%2fwhy-can-we-not-establish-the-irrationality-of-catalans-constant-the-same-way-as%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2947004%2fwhy-can-we-not-establish-the-irrationality-of-catalans-constant-the-same-way-as%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Having such an expression is by no means the same as irrationality. It is not clear how to adapt Apery's proof.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Oct 8 '18 at 12:42