Are unique prime ideal factorization domains noetherian?
Let $A$ be a domain satisfying the following condition:
If $mathfrak p_1,dots,mathfrak p_k$ are distinct nonzero prime ideals of $A$, and if $m$ and $n$ are distinct elements of $mathbb N^k$, then we have
$$
mathfrak p_1^{m_1}cdotsmathfrak p_k^{m_k}nemathfrak p_1^{n_1}cdotsmathfrak p_k^{n_k}.
$$
Is $A$ necessarily noetherian?
This question is motivated by these outstanding answers of user26857 and Julian Rosen.
user26857's answer shows that noetherian domains do satisfy the above condition, whereas Julian's answer shows that many non-noetherian domains do not satisfy it.
commutative-algebra maximal-and-prime-ideals noetherian integral-domain
asked Jan 3 at 15:06
Pierre-Yves Gaillard
13.2k23181
add a comment |
Let $A$ be a domain satisfying the following condition:
If $mathfrak p_1,dots,mathfrak p_k$ are distinct nonzero prime ideals of $A$, and if $m$ and $n$ are distinct elements of $mathbb N^k$, then we have
$$
mathfrak p_1^{m_1}cdotsmathfrak p_k^{m_k}nemathfrak p_1^{n_1}cdotsmathfrak p_k^{n_k}.
$$
Is $A$ necessarily noetherian?
This question is motivated by these outstanding answers of user26857 and Julian Rosen.
user26857's answer shows that noetherian domains do satisfy the above condition, whereas Julian's answer shows that many non-noetherian domains do not satisfy it.
commutative-algebra maximal-and-prime-ideals noetherian integral-domain
asked Jan 3 at 15:06
Pierre-Yves Gaillard
13.2k23181
1
It's true for $1$-dimensional valuation domains. Is it true for valuation domains in general?
– Badam Baplan
Jan 3 at 19:26
I think there are 1-dimensional valuation domains such that $m^2=m$.
– user26857
Jan 3 at 23:59
Yes exactly. A $1$-dimensional valuation domain is Noetherian iff its max ideal is not idempotent iff it satisfies the property in question.
– Badam Baplan
Jan 4 at 0:15
add a comment |
Let $A$ be a domain satisfying the following condition:
If $mathfrak p_1,dots,mathfrak p_k$ are distinct nonzero prime ideals of $A$, and if $m$ and $n$ are distinct elements of $mathbb N^k$, then we have
$$
mathfrak p_1^{m_1}cdotsmathfrak p_k^{m_k}nemathfrak p_1^{n_1}cdotsmathfrak p_k^{n_k}.
$$
Is $A$ necessarily noetherian?
This question is motivated by these outstanding answers of user26857 and Julian Rosen.
user26857's answer shows that noetherian domains do satisfy the above condition, whereas Julian's answer shows that many non-noetherian domains do not satisfy it.
commutative-algebra maximal-and-prime-ideals noetherian integral-domain
asked Jan 3 at 15:06
Pierre-Yves Gaillard
13.2k23181
Let $A$ be a domain satisfying the following condition:
If $mathfrak p_1,dots,mathfrak p_k$ are distinct nonzero prime ideals of $A$, and if $m$ and $n$ are distinct elements of $mathbb N^k$, then we have
$$
mathfrak p_1^{m_1}cdotsmathfrak p_k^{m_k}nemathfrak p_1^{n_1}cdotsmathfrak p_k^{n_k}.
$$
Is $A$ necessarily noetherian?
This question is motivated by these outstanding answers of user26857 and Julian Rosen.
user26857's answer shows that noetherian domains do satisfy the above condition, whereas Julian's answer shows that many non-noetherian domains do not satisfy it.
commutative-algebra maximal-and-prime-ideals noetherian integral-domain
commutative-algebra maximal-and-prime-ideals noetherian integral-domain
asked Jan 3 at 15:06
Pierre-Yves Gaillard
13.2k23181
asked Jan 3 at 15:06
Pierre-Yves Gaillard
13.2k23181
edited Jan 3 at 15:53
asked Jan 3 at 15:06
Pierre-Yves Gaillard
13.2k23181
asked Jan 3 at 15:06
Pierre-Yves Gaillard
13.2k23181
asked Jan 3 at 15:06
Pierre-Yves Gaillard
13.2k23181
13.2k23181
1
It's true for $1$-dimensional valuation domains. Is it true for valuation domains in general?
– Badam Baplan
Jan 3 at 19:26
I think there are 1-dimensional valuation domains such that $m^2=m$.
– user26857
Jan 3 at 23:59
Yes exactly. A $1$-dimensional valuation domain is Noetherian iff its max ideal is not idempotent iff it satisfies the property in question.
– Badam Baplan
Jan 4 at 0:15
add a comment |
1
It's true for $1$-dimensional valuation domains. Is it true for valuation domains in general?
– Badam Baplan
Jan 3 at 19:26
I think there are 1-dimensional valuation domains such that $m^2=m$.
– user26857
Jan 3 at 23:59
Yes exactly. A $1$-dimensional valuation domain is Noetherian iff its max ideal is not idempotent iff it satisfies the property in question.
– Badam Baplan
Jan 4 at 0:15
1
1
It's true for $1$-dimensional valuation domains. Is it true for valuation domains in general?
– Badam Baplan
Jan 3 at 19:26
It's true for $1$-dimensional valuation domains. Is it true for valuation domains in general?
– Badam Baplan
Jan 3 at 19:26
I think there are 1-dimensional valuation domains such that $m^2=m$.
– user26857
Jan 3 at 23:59
I think there are 1-dimensional valuation domains such that $m^2=m$.
– user26857
Jan 3 at 23:59
Yes exactly. A $1$-dimensional valuation domain is Noetherian iff its max ideal is not idempotent iff it satisfies the property in question.
– Badam Baplan
Jan 4 at 0:15
Yes exactly. A $1$-dimensional valuation domain is Noetherian iff its max ideal is not idempotent iff it satisfies the property in question.
– Badam Baplan
Jan 4 at 0:15
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Let's call domains having this property $UPIF$-domains, as in your first post.
Observe that a domain which is locally $UPIF$ is $UPIF$.
Indeed, given $$mathfrak p_1^{m_1}cdotsmathfrak p_k^{m_k}=mathfrak p_1^{n_1}cdotsmathfrak p_k^{n_k}$$
we can localize at each of the $mathfrak{p_i}$ one at a time and use the assumption that $D_{mathfrak{p_i}}$ is $UPIF$ to deduce that $m_i = n_i$.
From your linked Questions/Answers, we thus have that a locally Noetherian domain is locally UPIF, hence
A locally Noetherian domain is $UPIF$.
However, there are locally Noetherian domains that are not Noetherian.
A classic reference for such examples is section 2 of this paper of Heinzer and Ohm.
For a more recent reference, I'd suggest Loper's article on Almost Dedekind Domains Which Are Not Dedekind. In section 3, he discusses five distinct techniques for producing examples of non-Noetherian domains which are locally discrete valuation rings.
answered yesterday
Badam Baplan
4,471722
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060639%2fare-unique-prime-ideal-factorization-domains-noetherian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Let's call domains having this property $UPIF$-domains, as in your first post.
Observe that a domain which is locally $UPIF$ is $UPIF$.
Indeed, given $$mathfrak p_1^{m_1}cdotsmathfrak p_k^{m_k}=mathfrak p_1^{n_1}cdotsmathfrak p_k^{n_k}$$
we can localize at each of the $mathfrak{p_i}$ one at a time and use the assumption that $D_{mathfrak{p_i}}$ is $UPIF$ to deduce that $m_i = n_i$.
From your linked Questions/Answers, we thus have that a locally Noetherian domain is locally UPIF, hence
A locally Noetherian domain is $UPIF$.
However, there are locally Noetherian domains that are not Noetherian.
A classic reference for such examples is section 2 of this paper of Heinzer and Ohm.
For a more recent reference, I'd suggest Loper's article on Almost Dedekind Domains Which Are Not Dedekind. In section 3, he discusses five distinct techniques for producing examples of non-Noetherian domains which are locally discrete valuation rings.
answered yesterday
Badam Baplan
4,471722
add a comment |
Let's call domains having this property $UPIF$-domains, as in your first post.
Observe that a domain which is locally $UPIF$ is $UPIF$.
Indeed, given $$mathfrak p_1^{m_1}cdotsmathfrak p_k^{m_k}=mathfrak p_1^{n_1}cdotsmathfrak p_k^{n_k}$$
we can localize at each of the $mathfrak{p_i}$ one at a time and use the assumption that $D_{mathfrak{p_i}}$ is $UPIF$ to deduce that $m_i = n_i$.
From your linked Questions/Answers, we thus have that a locally Noetherian domain is locally UPIF, hence
A locally Noetherian domain is $UPIF$.
However, there are locally Noetherian domains that are not Noetherian.
A classic reference for such examples is section 2 of this paper of Heinzer and Ohm.
For a more recent reference, I'd suggest Loper's article on Almost Dedekind Domains Which Are Not Dedekind. In section 3, he discusses five distinct techniques for producing examples of non-Noetherian domains which are locally discrete valuation rings.
answered yesterday
Badam Baplan
4,471722
add a comment |
Let's call domains having this property $UPIF$-domains, as in your first post.
Observe that a domain which is locally $UPIF$ is $UPIF$.
Indeed, given $$mathfrak p_1^{m_1}cdotsmathfrak p_k^{m_k}=mathfrak p_1^{n_1}cdotsmathfrak p_k^{n_k}$$
we can localize at each of the $mathfrak{p_i}$ one at a time and use the assumption that $D_{mathfrak{p_i}}$ is $UPIF$ to deduce that $m_i = n_i$.
From your linked Questions/Answers, we thus have that a locally Noetherian domain is locally UPIF, hence
A locally Noetherian domain is $UPIF$.
However, there are locally Noetherian domains that are not Noetherian.
A classic reference for such examples is section 2 of this paper of Heinzer and Ohm.
For a more recent reference, I'd suggest Loper's article on Almost Dedekind Domains Which Are Not Dedekind. In section 3, he discusses five distinct techniques for producing examples of non-Noetherian domains which are locally discrete valuation rings.
answered yesterday
Badam Baplan
4,471722
Let's call domains having this property $UPIF$-domains, as in your first post.
Observe that a domain which is locally $UPIF$ is $UPIF$.
Indeed, given $$mathfrak p_1^{m_1}cdotsmathfrak p_k^{m_k}=mathfrak p_1^{n_1}cdotsmathfrak p_k^{n_k}$$
we can localize at each of the $mathfrak{p_i}$ one at a time and use the assumption that $D_{mathfrak{p_i}}$ is $UPIF$ to deduce that $m_i = n_i$.
From your linked Questions/Answers, we thus have that a locally Noetherian domain is locally UPIF, hence
A locally Noetherian domain is $UPIF$.
However, there are locally Noetherian domains that are not Noetherian.
A classic reference for such examples is section 2 of this paper of Heinzer and Ohm.
For a more recent reference, I'd suggest Loper's article on Almost Dedekind Domains Which Are Not Dedekind. In section 3, he discusses five distinct techniques for producing examples of non-Noetherian domains which are locally discrete valuation rings.
answered yesterday
Badam Baplan
4,471722
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Badam Baplan
4,471722
answered yesterday
Badam Baplan
4,471722
answered yesterday
Badam Baplan
4,471722
4,471722
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060639%2fare-unique-prime-ideal-factorization-domains-noetherian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
It's true for $1$-dimensional valuation domains. Is it true for valuation domains in general?
– Badam Baplan
Jan 3 at 19:26
I think there are 1-dimensional valuation domains such that $m^2=m$.
– user26857
Jan 3 at 23:59
Yes exactly. A $1$-dimensional valuation domain is Noetherian iff its max ideal is not idempotent iff it satisfies the property in question.
– Badam Baplan
Jan 4 at 0:15